Introduction to the UCI MAE Department
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Graphene.Vortex Fluidics.Final
Vortex fluidic exfoliation of graphite and boron nitride Author Chen, Xianjue, Dobson, John F, Raston, Colin L Published 2012 Journal Title Chemical Communications DOI https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CC17611D Copyright Statement © 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/47070 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Dynamic Article Links ► Journal Name Cite this: DOI: 10.1039/c0xx00000x www.rsc.org/xxxxxx ARTICLE TYPE Vortex fluidic exfoliation of graphite and boron nitride Xianjue Chen,a John F. Dobson,b and Colin L. Rastona,* Received (in XXX, XXX) Xth XXXXXXXXX 20XX, Accepted Xth XXXXXXXXX 20XX DOI: 10.1039/b000000x 5 Graphite is exfoliated into graphene sheets by the shearing in vortex fluidic films of N-methyl-pyrrolidone (NMP), as a (a) (c) (d) controlled process for preparing oxide free graphene with minimal defects, and for the exfoliation of the corresponding boron nitride sheets. (b) 10 Solution based methods have been widely used for the synthesis !"#$%&'()*+, of graphene from graphite or graphite oxide,1 using high energy '-%.", sonication for the exfoliation process in generating mono- or 2-8 multi-layer structures. However, the associated cavitation process can result in damage to the graphene,2 which can affect Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the vortex fluidic device (10 mm diameter 9,10 o 15 its properties. Developing facile methods for accessing viable tube, 16 cm long, inclined at 45 , operating at 7000 and 8000 rpm for quantities of graphene devoid of such defects, and also of graphite and BN respectively). -
DRAFT Nanotechnology Roadmap Technology Area 10
National Aeronautics and Space Administration DRAFT NANoTechNology RoADmAp Technology Area 10 Michael A. Meador, Chair Bradley Files Jing Li Harish Manohara Dan Powell Emilie J. Siochi November • 2010 DRAFT This page is intentionally left blank DRAFT Table of Contents Foreword Executive Summary TA10-1 1. General Overview TA10-6 1.1. Technical Approach TA10-6 1.2. Benefits TA10-6 1.3. Applicability/Traceability to NASA Strategic Goals, AMPM, DRMs, DRAs TA10-7 1.4. Top Technical Challenges TA10-7 2. Detailed Portfolio Discussion TA10-8 2.1. Summary Description TA10-8 2.2. WBS Description TA10-8 2.2.1. Engineered Materials TA10-8 2.2.1.1. Lightweight Materials and Structures. TA10-8 2.2.1.2. Damage Tolerant Systems TA10-9 2.2.1.3. Coatings TA10-10 2.2.1.4. Adhesives TA10-10 2.2.1.5. Thermal Protection and Control TA10-10 2.2.1.6. Key Capabilities TA10-11 2.2.2. Energy Generation and Storage TA10-12 2.2.2.1. Energy Generation TA10-13 2.2.2.2. Energy Storage TA10-13 2.2.2.3. Energy Distribution TA10-14 2.2.2.4. Key Capabilities TA10-14 2.2.3. Propulsion TA10-14 2.2.3.1. Nanopropellants TA10-14 2.2.3.2. Propulsion Systems TA10-15 2.2.3.3. In-Space Propulsion TA10-16 2.2.3.4. Key Capabilities TA10-17 2.2.4. Electronics, Devices and Sensors TA10-17 2.2.4.1. Sensors and Actuators TA10-17 2.2.4.2. Electronics TA10-17 2.2.4.3. -
Annual Report 2014 OUR VISION
AMOS Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems Annual Report 2014 Annual Report OUR VISION To establish a world-leading research centre for autonomous marine operations and systems: To nourish a lively scientific heart in which fundamental knowledge is created through multidisciplinary theoretical, numerical, and experimental research within the knowledge fields of hydrodynamics, structural mechanics, guidance, navigation, and control. Cutting-edge inter-disciplinary research will provide the necessary bridge to realise high levels of autonomy for ships and ocean structures, unmanned vehicles, and marine operations and to address the challenges associated with greener and safer maritime transport, monitoring and surveillance of the coast and oceans, offshore renewable energy, and oil and gas exploration and production in deep waters and Arctic waters. Editors: Annika Bremvåg and Thor I. Fossen Copyright AMOS, NTNU, 2014 www.ntnu.edu/amos AMOS • Annual Report 2014 Table of Contents Our Vision ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Director’s Report: Licence to Create............................................................................................................................. 4 Organization, Collaborators, and Facts and Figures 2014 ......................................................................................... 6 Presentation of New Affiliated Scientists................................................................................................................... -
Development of the Crew Dragon ECLSS
ICES-2020-333 Development of the Crew Dragon ECLSS Jason Silverman1, Andrew Irby2, and Theodore Agerton3 Space Exploration Technologies, Hawthorne, California, 90250 SpaceX designed the Crew Dragon spacecraft to be the safest ever flown and to restore the ability of the United States to launch astronauts. One of the key systems required for human flight is the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS), which was designed to work in concert with the spacesuit and spacecraft. The tight coupling of many subsystems combined with an emphasis on simplicity and fault tolerance created unique challenges and opportunities for the design team. During the development of the crew ECLSS, the Dragon 1 cargo spacecraft flew with a simple ECLSS for animals, providing an opportunity for technology development and the early characterization of system-level behavior. As the ECLSS design matured a series of tests were conducted, including with humans in a prototype capsule in November 2016, the Demo-1 test flight to the ISS in March 2019, and human-in-the-loop ground testing in the Demo-2 capsule in January 2020 before the same vehicle performs a crewed test flight. This paper describes the design and operations of the ECLSS, the development process, and the lessons learned. Nomenclature AC = air conditioning AQM = air quality monitor AVV = active vent valve CCiCap = Commercial Crew Integrated Capability CCtCap = Commercial Crew Transportation Capability CFD = computational fluid dynamics conops = concept of operations COPV = composite overwrapped -
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter. -
Japan Cargo Spacecraft Docks at ISS 18 September 2009
Japan cargo spacecraft docks at ISS 18 September 2009 It was the first time that astronauts operate a Canadian robotic arm at the ISS to dock a spacecraft at the station. The HTV carried 4.5 tonnes of supplies, including food and daily necessities for the six ISS crew, as well as materials for experiments, such as seeds for growing plants in space. The 10-metre (33-foot) long cylindrical vehicle, which cost 20 billion yen (217 million dollars), will soon unload the supplies. It will later take waste materials and return to Earth, burning up as it re-enters the atmosphere. Japan has spent 68 billion yen developing the vehicle, which could be modified in future to carry Japan's first cargo spacecraft arrived at the International humans. Space Station on Friday after astronauts aboard the station grabbed and docked it using a robotic arm. The docking came a week after the Japan Aerospace (c) 2009 AFP Exploration Agency (JAXA) launched the unmanned HTV transportation vehicle atop an H-2B rocket (in picture). Japan's first cargo spacecraft arrived at the International Space Station (ISS) on Friday after astronauts aboard the station grabbed and docked it using a robotic arm. The docking came a week after the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) launched the unmanned HTV transportation vehicle atop an H-2B rocket. The HTV is Japan's first freighter spacecraft aiming for a share of space transport after the retirement of the US space shuttle fleet next year. "I'm so relieved because I was feeling the pressure and responsibility," Koji Yamanaka, the flight director in charge of the cargo mission, told reporters at Japan's Tsukuba space centre. -
Nanotechnology Publications: Leading Countries and Blocs
Date: January 29, 2010 Author Note: I provide links and a copy of my working paper (that you may make freely available on your website) and a link to the published paper. Link to working paper: http://www.cherry.gatech.edu/PUBS/09/STIP_AN.pdf Link to published paper: http://www.springerlink.com/content/ag2m127l6615w023/ Page 1 of 1 Program on Nanotechnology Research and Innovation System Assessment Georgia Institute of Technology Active Nanotechnology: What Can We Expect? A Perspective for Policy from Bibliographical and Bibliometric Analysis Vrishali Subramanian Program in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy School of Public Policy and Enterprise Innovation Institute Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332‐0345, USA March 2009 Acknowledgements: This research was undertaken at the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) and at Georgia Tech with support by the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) and Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University ( sponsored by the National Science Foundation Award No. 0531194). The findings contained in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) or the National Science Foundation. For additional details, see http://cns.asu.edu (CNS‐ASU) and http://www.nanopolicy.gatech.edu (Georgia Tech Program on Nanotechnology Research and Innovation Systems Assessment).The author wishes to thank Dave Rejeski, Andrew Maynard, Mihail Roco, Philip Shapira, Jan Youtie and Alan Porter. Executive Summary Over the past few years, policymakers have grappled with the challenge of regulating nanotechnology, whose novelty, complexity and rapid commercialization has highlighted the discrepancies of science and technology oversight. -
Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 2 May–June 2019 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 1 European industrial leadership at stake ............................................................................ 1 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 2 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 2 9th EU-ESA Space Council .......................................................................................... 2 Europe’s Martian ambitions take shape ......................................................................... 2 ESA’s advancements on Planetary Defence Systems ........................................................... 2 ESA prepares for rescuing Humans on Moon .................................................................... 3 ESA’s private partnerships ......................................................................................... 3 ESA’s international cooperation with Japan .................................................................... 3 New EU Parliament, new EU European Space Policy? ......................................................... 3 France reflects on its competitiveness and defence posture in space ...................................... 3 Germany joins consortium to support a European reusable rocket......................................... -
GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, and CONTROL 2020 AAS PRESIDENT Carol S
GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL 2020 AAS PRESIDENT Carol S. Lane Cynergy LLC VICE PRESIDENT – PUBLICATIONS James V. McAdams KinetX Inc. EDITOR Jastesh Sud Lockheed Martin Space SERIES EDITOR Robert H. Jacobs Univelt, Incorporated Front Cover Illustration: Image: Checkpoint-Rehearsal-Movie-1024x720.gif Caption: “OSIRIS-REx Buzzes Sample Site Nightingale” Photo and Caption Credit: NASA/Goddard/University of Arizona Public Release Approval: Per multimedia guidelines from NASA Frontispiece Illustration: Image: NASA_Orion_EarthRise.jpg Caption: “Orion Primed for Deep Space Exploration” Photo Credit: NASA Public Release Approval: Per multimedia guidelines from NASA GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL 2020 Volume 172 ADVANCES IN THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES Edited by Jastesh Sud Proceedings of the 43rd AAS Rocky Mountain Section Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference held January 30 to February 5, 2020, Breckenridge, Colorado Published for the American Astronautical Society by Univelt, Incorporated, P.O. Box 28130, San Diego, California 92198 Web Site: http://www.univelt.com Copyright 2020 by AMERICAN ASTRONAUTICAL SOCIETY AAS Publications Office P.O. Box 28130 San Diego, California 92198 Affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science Member of the International Astronautical Federation First Printing 2020 Library of Congress Card No. 57-43769 ISSN 0065-3438 ISBN 978-0-87703-669-2 (Hard Cover Plus CD ROM) ISBN 978-0-87703-670-8 (Digital Version) Published for the American Astronautical Society by Univelt, Incorporated, P.O. Box 28130, San Diego, California 92198 Web Site: http://www.univelt.com Printed and Bound in the U.S.A. FOREWORD HISTORICAL SUMMARY The annual American Astronautical Society Rocky Mountain Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference began as an informal exchange of ideas and reports of achievements among local guidance and control specialists. -
Human Asteroid Exploitation Mission Blue Team - Space Vehicle
SD2905 - HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT 1 Human asteroid exploitation mission Blue team - Space Vehicle Jeremy BEK, Clement´ BORNE, Anton KABJ˚ ORN¨ and Filippo POZZI Abstract—Asteroid rendez-vous and mining is one step Where a is one astronomical unit, MC the mass towards deep space exploration and interplanetary jour- of the Earth and M@ those of the Sun. The lunar neys, and it could prove to be a very lucrative endeavour. distance LD is 384 400 km so the asteroid is outside This paper tackles the space vehicle design associated of Earth’s sphere of influence. The orbital period with the hypothetical mission. It presents background, challenges and solutions linked with spacecraft design. The is one year, just like Earth, and so its seen period structure, mass, cost and technology readiness level (TRL) around Earth is also one year. This means that of the different systems composing the space vehicles are whichever trajectory is chosen, there is a launch described in the report. window every year at the same period. Index Terms—Spacecraft design, Asteroid, Mining, Technology Readiness Level. I. INTRODUCTION Designing a space vehicle for a certain mission is a complicated task that contains many parameters and variables. Even more so, for a particularly ambitious mission like asteroid mining. However, this paper constitutes a preliminary study of what Fig. 1. Orbit of 469219 Kamo’oalewa could resemble such a mission, from a vehicle point of view. The study tackles various topics, such as trajectory III. LAUNCHERS calculations, launcher considerations, or spacecraft The launch is the first part of a spaceflight. For the design. -
Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040
Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040 Exploring the S&T Edge NATO Science & Technology Organization DISCLAIMER The research and analysis underlying this report and its conclusions were conducted by the NATO S&T Organization (STO) drawing upon the support of the Alliance’s defence S&T community, NATO Allied Command Transformation (ACT) and the NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCIA). This report does not represent the official opinion or position of NATO or individual governments, but provides considered advice to NATO and Nations’ leadership on significant S&T issues. D.F. Reding J. Eaton NATO Science & Technology Organization Office of the Chief Scientist NATO Headquarters B-1110 Brussels Belgium http:\www.sto.nato.int Distributed free of charge for informational purposes; hard copies may be obtained on request, subject to availability from the NATO Office of the Chief Scientist. The sale and reproduction of this report for commercial purposes is prohibited. Extracts may be used for bona fide educational and informational purposes subject to attribution to the NATO S&T Organization. Unless otherwise credited all non-original graphics are used under Creative Commons licensing (for original sources see https://commons.wikimedia.org and https://www.pxfuel.com/). All icon-based graphics are derived from Microsoft® Office and are used royalty-free. Copyright © NATO Science & Technology Organization, 2020 First published, March 2020 Foreword As the world Science & Tech- changes, so does nology Trends: our Alliance. 2020-2040 pro- NATO adapts. vides an assess- We continue to ment of the im- work together as pact of S&T ad- a community of vances over the like-minded na- next 20 years tions, seeking to on the Alliance. -
An Assessment of Cost Improvements in the NASA COTS/CRS Program and Implications for Future NASA Missions
An Assessment of Cost Improvements in the NASA COTS/CRS Program and Implications for Future NASA Missions Edgar Zapataa National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Kennedy Space Center, FL, 32899 In May 2012, the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft became the first commercial spacecraft to arrive at the International Space Station (ISS). This achievement, and that of other partners in the NASA Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program, would surface difficult questions about NASA’s other more traditional development processes and their traditionally high costs. The cost of the non-traditional COTS public private partnership for the development of spacecraft and launch systems, and later the prices for services to deliver cargo to the ISS, would be praised or criticized by one measure of cost versus another, often with little regard for consistency or data. The goal here is to do the math, to bring rigorous life cycle cost (LCC) analysis into discussions about COTS program costs. We gather publicly available cost data, review the data for credibility, check for consistency among sources, and rigorously define and analyze specific cost metrics. This paper shows quantitatively that the COTS development and later the operational Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) are significant advances in affordability by any measure. To understand measureable improvements in context, we also create and analyze an apples-to-apples scenario where the Space Shuttle would have fulfilled the ISS cargo requirement versus the COTS/CRS launchers and spacecraft. Alternately, we review valid questions that arise where measures or comparisons are not easy or break down, with no quantitative path to clear conclusions.