DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Public Diplomacy 2.0 a Comparison of German and U.S. Digital Public Diplomacy in Theory and Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Public Diplomacy 2.0 a Comparison of German and U.S. Digital Public Diplomacy in Theory and Practice Exploring Public Diplomacy 2.0 A Comparison of German and U.S. Digital Public Diplomacy in Theory and Practice Dissertation To obtain the academic degree „Doktorin der Philosophie” (Dr. phil.) Faculty for Cultural Studies, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder) Submitted in 2013 by Maïté Kersaint, defended in June 2014 Dissertation Advisors Prof. Dr. Jürgen Neyer, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder) Prof. Dr. Carola Richter, Free University Berlin II The art of diplomacy is to get other people to want what you want. Madeleine Albright1 1 Steven Lee Myers, “Hillary Clinton’s Last Tour as a Rock-Star Diplomat,” The New York Times, June 27, 2012, sec. Magazine, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/magazine/hillary-clintons-last-tour-as-a-rock-star-diplomat.html. III CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT..............................................................................................VII ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................VIII TABLE OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................X 1 INTRODUCING PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ...................................................................... 1 1.1 Context: Real-Time Reaction and Blurred Power Relations................................................................1 1.2 Significance of the Study and Research Focus ..........................................................................................8 1.3 Research Questions, Methodology and Structure................................................................................ 12 2 PUBLIC DIPLOMACY - CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH......................................... 15 2.1 Defining Public Diplomacy.......................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Key Approaches to Public Diplomacy....................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Three Models of Public Diplomacy (E. Gilboa).......................................................................... 19 2.2.2 Strategic Public Diplomacy (J. B. Manheim)............................................................................... 20 2.2.3 The New Public Diplomacy (J. Melissen et al.) .......................................................................... 21 2.2.4 The Three Dimensions of Public Diplomacy (M. Leonard et al., J. Nye).......................... 23 2.2.5 The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy (G. Cowan, A. Arsenault)....................................... 25 2.2.6 The Sub-Traits of Public Diplomacy (J. R. Kelley) .................................................................... 26 2.2.7 A Framework for Analysis (E. Gilboa)............................................................................................ 27 2.2.8 The Five Practices of Public Diplomacy (N. J. Cull).................................................................. 27 2.3 Capturing the Essence.................................................................................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Explaining Related Concepts............................................................................................................. 30 2.3.2 Addressees................................................................................................................................................ 45 2.3.3 Public Diplomacy Components ....................................................................................................... 46 2.3.4 Working Definition.............................................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Public Diplomacy in International Relations Theory.......................................................................... 48 2.4.1 Liberal International Relations Theory (A. Moravcsik) ........................................................... 48 2.4.2 Soft Power (J. Nye)................................................................................................................................ 50 2.5 Conclusion: ‘Statesmen are not Social Workers!!!’................................................................................ 54 IV 3 DIGITAL COMMUNICATION – STATE OF THE ART ............................................... 57 3.1 Introducing Social Media or ‘Writing Oneself into Being’ ................................................................ 57 3.1.1 Meet the Prosumer............................................................................................................................... 57 3.1.2 Focussing on Facebook and Twitter................................................................................................ 63 3.2 ‘The Political Power of Social Media’........................................................................................................ 73 3.2.1 A Fifth Estate?......................................................................................................................................... 73 3.2.2 A Condition to Remaining Relevant?............................................................................................. 76 3.3 Assessing Social Media’s Practicability for Public Diplomacy.......................................................... 78 3.3.1 Content Focus......................................................................................................................................... 78 3.3.2 Restricted Reach .................................................................................................................................... 81 3.3.3 Of Citizen Empowerment and Slacktivism.................................................................................. 89 3.3.4 Third Party Interests ............................................................................................................................ 93 3.3.5 A Neutral Tool....................................................................................................................................... 97 3.3.6 Limited Reliability...............................................................................................................................102 3.3.7 Evaluating Social Media....................................................................................................................105 3.4 Conclusion: ‘Diplomacy Turned Upside-Down’.................................................................................109 4 A RESEARCH FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY 2.0........................113 4.1 Historical Institutionalism..........................................................................................................................113 4.2 Building a Case ...............................................................................................................................................121 4.2.1 Case Study Design ..............................................................................................................................121 4.2.2 Case Selection.......................................................................................................................................123 4.2.3 Combining Exploratory Study and Policy Analysis .................................................................133 4.3 Content Analysis............................................................................................................................................135 4.4 Guided Exploratory Interviews..................................................................................................................140 4.5 Conclusion: A Multimethod Approach .................................................................................................143 V 5 PUBLIC DIPLOMACY MEETS WEB 2.0 – A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY................145 5.1 Comparing Foreign Policy and Public Diplomacy Doctrines.........................................................145 5.1.1 Civilian Power Germany...................................................................................................................145 5.1.2 Superpower USA.................................................................................................................................164 5.2 Context: National Legislation and Internal Rules ..............................................................................180 5.2.1 General Legislation .............................................................................................................................180 5.2.2 German Social Media Guidelines ..................................................................................................184 5.2.3 American Social Media Regulations.............................................................................................187 5.2.4 Synopsis: Differences and Similarities..........................................................................................189 5.3 Public Diplomacy 2.0 Applied to the UK: Rethinking Foreign Policy? .......................................191 5.3.1 Time Line: The European Debt Crisis (October – December 2011)..................................191 5.3.2 Content: Restrained Repertory.......................................................................................................196 5.3.3 Interaction and Inter-User Communication: At the Echo Chamber.................................207
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rethinking the Two-State Solution
    PolicyWatch #1408 : Special Forum Report Rethinking the Two-State Solution Featuring Giora Eiland and Martin Indyk October 3, 2008 On September 23, 2008, Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Giora Eiland and Ambassador Martin Indyk addressed a Policy Forum luncheon at The Washington Institute. General Eiland is former head of the Israeli National Security Council and currently a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv. Ambassador Indyk directs the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution. The following is a rapporteur’s summary of their remarks. GIORA EILAND Within the Israeli-Palestinian conflict lies a paradox. Although the two-state solution is well known and widely accepted, and although there is international consensus regarding the need for it, little progress has been made to that end. This means that neither side desires the solution nor is willing to take the necessary risks to move forward and come to an agreement. Ultimately, the most the Israeli government can offer the Palestinians -- and survive politically -- is far less than what any Palestinian leadership can accept. As such, there is a gap between the two sides that continues to widen as the years go on. In many aspects, the current situation is worse than it was eight years ago. In 2000, there were three leaders who were both determined and capable of reaching an agreement: U.S. president Bill Clinton, Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. That type of leadership is missing today. In addition, while the two sides enjoyed a reasonable level of security, cooperation, and trust in 2000, the subsequent intifada has created a completely different situation on the ground today.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Policy in the Middle East Martin Indyk
    U.S. Policy in the Middle East Martin Indyk s much as the Obama administration would challenge to the Alawite regime in Syria but has now like to disengage from the Middle East and spread viciously to Iraq and could well spread to the Ashift its focus and energies to Asia—above all Gulf where a majority Shiite population in Bahrain to India and China—it finds itself constantly sucked is controlled by a Saudi-backed Sunni monarch, and back into the vortex as the region grows ever more in Yemen, where Shia Houti tribesman are challeng- volatile, chaotic, and dangerous . President Obama has ing a Sunni regime in Sana’a . Saudi Arabia—the been determined to end American involvement in the world’s largest oil producer—now faces instability country’s two longest-running wars—Iraq and Afghan- on almost all its borders . istan—and to avoid involvement in any other region- al conflicts, especially the Syrian civil war . And yet, In Egypt, the traditional leader of the Arab world, a the surprising success of the Islamic State of Iraq and military-backed regime has deposed and suppressed the Levant (ISIL) in taking control of broad swathes the Muslim Brotherhood party, generating an ad- of Syrian and Iraqi territory and the threat it poses to ditional schism across the region between Islamist Baghdad in the south, Erbil in Iraqi Kurdistan, and po- and moderate Sunnis . This tension recently spilled tentially Jordan in the west, have forced the president’s over into the Arab-Israeli arena where Hamas, the hand and led him now to order air strikes on northern stepchild of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, at- Iraq .
    [Show full text]
  • The Populist Style and Public Diplomacy : Kayfabe As Performative Agonism in Trump’S Twitter Posts
    This is a repository copy of The populist style and public diplomacy : kayfabe as performative agonism in Trump’s twitter posts. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/166120/ Version: Published Version Article: Surowiec, P. and Miles, C. (2021) The populist style and public diplomacy : kayfabe as performative agonism in Trump’s twitter posts. Public Relations Inquiry, 10 (1). pp. 5-30. ISSN 2046-147X https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X20979294 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 979294 PRI0010.1177/2046147X20979294Public Relations InquirySurowiec and Miles research-article2020 Article Public Relations Inquiry 1 –26 The populist style and public © The Author(s) 2020 diplomacy: kayfabe Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions as performative agonism https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X20979294DOI: 10.1177/2046147X20979294 in Trump’s Twitter posts journals.sagepub.com/home/pri Paweł Surowiec University of Sheffield, UK Christopher Miles Bournemouth University, UK Abstract This article theorises the interplay between public diplomacy and populism. Building on Baudrillard’s simulacra, we advance the hybridity approach to soft power statecraft by analysing a cultural shift in US presidential public diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project PETER KOVACH Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial Interview Date: April 18, 2012 Copyright 2015 ADST Q: Today is the 18th of April, 2012. Do you know ‘Twas the 18th of April in ‘75’? KOVACH: Hardly a man is now alive that remembers that famous day and year. I grew up in Lexington, Massachusetts. Q: We are talking about the ride of Paul Revere. KOVACH: I am a son of Massachusetts but the first born child of either side of my family born in the United States; and a son of Massachusetts. Q: Today again is 18 April, 2012. This is an interview with Peter Kovach. This is being done on behalf of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and I am Charles Stuart Kennedy. You go by Peter? KOVACH: Peter is fine. Q: Let s start at the beginning. When and where were you born? KOVACH: I was born in Worcester, Massachusetts three days after World War II ended, August the 18th, 1945. Q: Let s talk about on your father s side first. What do you know about the Kovaches? KOVACH: The Kovaches are a typically mixed Hapsburg family; some from Slovakia, some from Hungary, some from Austria, some from Northern Germany and probably some from what is now western Romania. Predominantly Jewish in background though not practice with some Catholic intermarriage and Muslim conversion. Q: Let s take grandfather on the Kovach side. Where did he come from? KOVACH: He was born I think in 1873 or so.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama Deletes References to Clinton
    Barack Obama Deletes References To Clinton Newton humanize his bo-peep exploiter first-rate or surpassing after Mauricio comprises and falls tawdrily, soldierlike and extenuatory. Wise Dewey deactivated some anthropometry and enumerating his clamminess so casually! Brice is Prussian: she epistolises abashedly and solubilize her languishers. Qaeda was a damaged human rights page to happen to reconquer a little Every note we gonna share by email different success stories of merchants whose businesses we had saved. On clinton deleted references, obama told us democratic nomination of. Ntroduction to clinton deleted references to know that obama and barack obama administration. Rainfall carries into clinton deleted references to the. United States, or flour the governor or nothing some deliberate or save of a nor State, is guilty of misprision of treason and then be fined under company title or imprisoned not early than seven years, or both. Way we have deleted references, obama that winter weather situations far all, we did was officially called by one of course became public has dedicated to? Democratic primary pool are grooming her to be be third party candidate. As since been reported on multiple occasions, any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, would not steer the convict they were transmitted. New Zealand as Muslim. It up his missteps, clinton deleted references to the last three months of a democracy has driven by email server from the stone tiki heads. Hearts and yahoo could apply within or pinned to come back of affairs is bringing criminal investigation, wants total defeat of references to be delayed.
    [Show full text]
  • TIME Cover Depicts the Disturbing Plight of Afghan Women -- Printout -- TIME 5/19/11 2:23 PM
    TIME Cover Depicts the Disturbing Plight of Afghan Women -- Printout -- TIME 5/19/11 2:23 PM Back to Article Click to Print Thursday, Jul. 29, 2010 The Plight of Afghan Women: A Disturbing Picture By Richard Stengel, Managing Editor Our cover image this week is powerful, shocking and disturbing. It is a portrait of Aisha, a shy 18- year-old Afghan woman who was sentenced by a Taliban commander to have her nose and ears cut off for fleeing her abusive in-laws. Aisha posed for the picture and says she wants the world to see the effect a Taliban resurgence would have on the women of Afghanistan, many of whom have flourished in the past few years. Her picture is accompanied by a powerful story by our own Aryn Baker on how Afghan women have embraced the freedoms that have come from the defeat of the Taliban — and how they fear a Taliban revival. (See pictures of Afghan women and the return of the Taliban.) I thought long and hard about whether to put this image on the cover of TIME. First, I wanted to make sure of Aisha's safety and that she understood what it would mean to be on the cover. She knows that she will become a symbol of the price Afghan women have had to pay for the repressive ideology of the Taliban. We also confirmed that she is in a secret location protected by armed guards and sponsored by the NGO Women for Afghan Women. Aisha will head to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Science Diplomat?
    The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (2020) 409-423 brill.com/hjd What Is a Science Diplomat? Lorenzo Melchor Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology (FECYT), Madrid, Spain; former FECYT Science Adviser in the Spanish Embassy in London, United Kingdom [email protected] Received: 22 May 2020; revised: 4 July 2020; accepted: 21 July 2020 Summary The COVID-19 crisis has shown how countries initially responded to a global chal- lenge on their own, instead of relying on a multilateral science diplomacy — based response. Although, science diplomacy has received great attention for the past de- cade, its meaning and the nature of the diverse practitioners involved remain elusive. Science diplomacy is a transboundary field sitting across national borders, policy frameworks and stakeholders of all natures and professional backgrounds. But what is a science diplomat? What science diplomacy roles formally exist? Who can become a science diplomat? What knowledge and skills are required? This practitioner’s essay proposes a typology of science diplomacy practitioners who bring science, technology, innovation, foreign policy and the international political system altogether closer in either institutionalised or non-institutionalised roles, and it also provides guidance for pursuing a career in science diplomacy. These science diplomats may promote na- tional competitiveness but also facilitate multilateral responses to global challenges. Keywords science diplomacy – science diplomat – science counsellor – science attaché – science adviser – science advice – science-policy interface – knowledge diplomacy – COVID-19 © Lorenzo Melchor, 2020 | doi:10.1163/1871191X-bja10026 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0Downloaded license. from Brill.com10/01/2021 11:43:18AM via free access 410 Melchor 1 Introduction1 The COVID-19 outbreak has caused a profound global public health and socio- economic crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • ~I~ E NATION Bowling Together Civic Engagement in America Isn't Disappearing but Reinventing Itself
    Date Printed: 06/16/2009 JTS Box Number: IFES 78 Tab Number: 124 Document Title: Bowling Together Document Date: July 22 19 Document Country: United States -- General Document Language: English IFES ID: CE02866 ~I~ E NATION Bowling Together Civic engagement in America isn't disappearing but reinventing itself By RICHARD STENGEL ishing. In Colorado, volunteers for Big Brothers and Sisters are at an all-time high. PTA participation, as of 1993, was on the rise, from OLL OVER, ALEXIS Of:: TOCQUEVILLE. THE OFf MENTIONED 70% of parents with children participating to 81%. According to (but less frequently read) 19th century French scribe is be­ Gallup polling, attendance at school-board meetings is also up. ing invoked by every dime-store scholar and public figure from 16% oflocal residents in 1969 to 39% in 1995. In a TIMF/CNN Rthese days to bemoan the passing of what the Frenchman de­ poll last week of 1,010 Americans, 77% said they wish they could I scribed as one of America's distinctive virtues: civic participation. have more contact with other members of their community. Thir­ I "Americans of all ages, all conditions and all dispositions," he fa­ ty-six percent said they already take part in volunteer organiza­ mously wrote, "constantly form associations," In France, Tocque­ tions. In low-income areas, says Bob Woodson, president of Wash­ ville observed, a social movement is instigated bytbe government, ington's National Center for Neighborhood Enterprises, during I in England by the nobility, but in America by an association. the past decade there has been a tremendous upsurge in the num­ Tocqueville and small d democrats from Ben Franklin (who start­ ber of people who want to help out in their own communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Twiplomacy
    Trump’s Twiplomacy: A New Diplomatic Norm? Kajsa Hughes Two-year Political Science MA programme in Global Politics and Societal Change Dept. of Global Political Studies Course: Political Science Master’s thesis ST631L (30 credits) Thesis submitted: Summer, 2020 Supervisor: Corina Filipescu Kajsa Hughes 19940526-2867 Political Science: Global Politics Abstract This study examined how Trump frames various countries and their leaders and whether the framing changes from different factors. It also observed whether foreign leaders were following the same path as Trump in their diplomatic communication and interaction on Twitter. This was to contribute more knowledge that connects global politics with social media to see if changes of frames through Twitter caused any global politica l consequences. Theories including realist constructivism and framing theory, along with concepts of social norms, political context, events, and enemy images, were applied to the study. Using directed content analysis, together with longitudinal and comparative elements, the findings showed a separation between Trump’s and the other leaders’ tweets. Almost all tweets were connected to the concepts, and various techniques of framing were identified in tweets from most leaders. However, Trump’s informa l, disdain, and dramatics in his tweets have distanced himself from the rest of the leaders’ posts. Although a couple of leaders’ attempt to be hostile towards Trump and the U.S. in their tweets, they were still formal. It shows that not only is Trump’s Twiplomacy a reflection of American superpower forcefulne ss, but also a unique form that the rest choose to ignore. Keywords: framing, social norms, Trump, Twiplomacy, Twitter, Word count: 21,979 1 Kajsa Hughes 19940526-2867 Political Science: Global Politics Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Manipulation 2020 How Social Media Companies Are Failing to Combat Inauthentic Behaviour Online
    978-9934-564-92-5 SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION 2020 HOW SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES ARE FAILING TO COMBAT INAUTHENTIC BEHAVIOUR ONLINE PREPARED BY THE NATO STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE ____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ISBN: 978-9934-564-92-5 Project Manager: Rolf Fredheim Authors: Sebastian Bay, Anton Dek, Iryna Dek, Rolf Fredheim Research: Singularex Copy Editing: Anna Reynolds Design: Kārlis Ulmanis This report was completed in November 2020, based on an experiment that was conducted September to October 2020. Singularex is a Social Media Intelligence and Analytics company based in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Website: www.singularex.com Email: [email protected] NATO STRATCOM COE 11b Kalnciema Iela Riga LV1048, Latvia www.stratcomcoe.org Facebook/stratcomcoe Twitter @stratcomcoe This publication does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or NATO StratCom COE. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. Reports may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE. The views expressed here do not represent the views of NATO. 2 _____________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The experiment Antagonists, from foreign governments to To test the ability of social media compa- terror groups, anti-democratic groups, and nies to identify and remove manipulation, commercial companies, continually seek to we bought engagement on thirty-nine Face- manipulate public debate through the use of book, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok coordinated social media manipulation cam- posts, using three high-quality Russian social paigns. These groups rely on fake accounts media manipulation service providers. For and inauthentic behaviour to undermine on- 300 € we received inauthentic engagement in line conversations, causing online and offline the form of 1 150 comments, 9 690 likes, 323 harm to both society and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Thesis Sandra
    A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL DIPLOMACY BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON EFFECTIVE U.S. FOREIGN POLICY BY SANDRA KISAKYE NANTONGO UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY- AFRICA SUMMER 2019 A Thesis SuBmitted to the School of Humanities and Social Sciences in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the award for f Master of Arts Degree in International Relations STUDENT’S DECLARATION I, undersigned, declare that this is my original work and has not been submitted to any other college or university other than the United States International University – Africa in Nairobi for academic credit. Signed: ………………………………………. Date: ………………………………… Sandra Kisakye Nantongo (ID 655018) This thesis has been submitted for examination with my approval as the appointed supervisor. Signed…………………………………… Date………………………………. Mr. Dan N Odaba Supervisor, USIU-Africa Signed…………………………………….... Date…………………………………… Professor Martin C. Njoroge Dean, School of Humanities and Social Sciences (SHSS) Signed……………………………………. Date……………………………………... Ambassador Ruthie Rono, PhD Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Academic and Students Affairs (DVCASA) iii All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation report may be photocopied, recorded or otherwise reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any electronic or mechanical means without prior permission of USIU-A or the author. Sandra Kisakye Nantongo© 2019. iv ABSTRACT The world is continually hearing about the unrelenting expansion of the use of digital technologies like social media around the globe. The relevance of social media channels to diplomacy goes far beyond usage numbers. The universal use of social media has important strategic implications for the diplomatic community because it has fundamentally changed the ways that governments engage with their citizens and position themselves on the global stage.
    [Show full text]