DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Improvement Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit Improvement Strategies CPHX DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES Note: This document presents a planning level assessment of the feasibility of various improvement strategies for consideration when developing MAG’s NexGen RTP. The RTP process would include further technical evaluation and vetting of the strategies with stakeholders and the public. © All Rights Reserved, 2010 CENTRAL PHOENIX TRANSPORTATION FRAMEWORK STUDY Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1. Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study ....................................................................................... 1 1.1.2. Purpose of this Technical Memorandum ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 CPHX CHARRETTE ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.0 IMPLEMENTING TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES .................................................................................. 11 2.1 SETTING THE STAGE ................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 LEGAL BASIS FOR IMPLEMENTING TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................................................. 12 3.0 POTENTIAL TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES .......................................................................................... 13 3.1 GENERAL STRATEGIES ................................................................................................................................................ 13 3.2 TRANSIT SERVICE ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIES ................................................................................................................ 13 3.2.1. High‐Capacity Transit .................................................................................................................................. 14 3.2.2. Bus Rapid Transit ......................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.3. Express Bus .................................................................................................................................................. 20 3.2.4. Multi‐way Boulevard ................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.5. Complete Streets ......................................................................................................................................... 23 3.3 TRANSIT OPERATIONAL INNOVATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 24 3.3.1. Transit Technologies .................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3.2. Go Green ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3.3. Transit Advantages...................................................................................................................................... 25 3.4 STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE PUBLIC TRANSIT PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................ 25 3.5 TRANSIT SYSTEM ASSET MANAGEMENT – “STATE OF GOOD REPAIR” ................................................................................. 26 3.6 TRANSIT SYSTEM/RIDER INTERFACE .............................................................................................................................. 27 3.7 TRANSIT‐SUPPORTIVE POLICIES .................................................................................................................................... 29 3.7.1. Transit‐Oriented Development (TOD) .......................................................................................................... 30 3.7.2. Mobility Management ................................................................................................................................. 31 3.7.3. Actions to Encourage Transit Ridership ....................................................................................................... 34 4.0 FEDERAL PROGRAM SUPPORT FOR TRANSIT SERVICE ENHANCEMENT ........................................................... 36 Attachments ATTACHMENT A REFERENCE LIST OF GUIDES TO TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS ATTACHMENT B REVIEW OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS: PUBLIC TRANSIT EXCERPT ATTACHMENT C EXISTING CONDITIONS & RAPID BUS SERVICE CONCEPTS: METRO TRANSIT ARTERIAL TRANSITWAY CORRIDORS STUDY ATTACHMENT D MULTI‐WAY BOULEVARD BASIC IMPROVEMENTS TEMPLATE ATTACHMENT E TOD WORKING GROUP UPDATE FOR THE METRO RAIL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ATTACHMENT F FTA PROGRAM FACT SHEETS: MAP‐21 DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Page i of ii Transit Service Improvement Strategies September, 2013 CENTRAL PHOENIX TRANSPORTATION FRAMEWORK STUDY List of Figures FIGURE 1 CPHX STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 FIGURE 2 SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CPHX CHARRETTE ................................................ 10 FIGURE 3 POTENTIAL TRANSIT/USER INTERFACE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES ........................................................................................ 12 FIGURE 4 POTENTIAL HCT‐SUPPORTIVE CORRIDORS ........................................................................................................................ 15 FIGURE 5 HIGLEY ROAD BRT STOP/STATION: MAIN STREET, MESA, AZ ............................................................................................. 16 FIGURE 6 SYSTEM FEATURES: ARTERIAL BRT‐HEALTHLINE, EUCLID CORRIDOR, CLEVELAND, OHIO ........................................................... 17 FIGURE 7 SYSTEM FEATURES OF ARTERIAL BRT ............................................................................................................................... 19 FIGURE 8 GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF THE CONVERSION OF EL CAMINO CORRIDOR TO ACCOMMODATE MIXED‐FLOW BRT SERVICE .................... 19 FIGURE 9 MULTI‐WAY BOULEVARD TREATMENTS, PHOENIX, ARIZONA ................................................................................................ 21 FIGURE 10 OCTAVIA BOULEVARD CENTRAL FREEWAY REPLACEMENT PROJECT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA ......................................................... 22 FIGURE 11 MULTI‐WAY BOULEVARDS WITH SIDE ACCESS LANES, CALIFORNIA ....................................................................................... 22 FIGURE 12 POTENTIAL TRANSIT/USER INTERFACE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES ...................................................................................... 28 FIGURE 13 LOCAL AND REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ....................................................................................................... 29 FIGURE 14 TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE PLANNING POLICIES ....................................................................................................................... 30 FIGURE 15 TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES .............................................................................................................................. 31 FIGURE 16 METRO LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT‐ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT: HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS ................................................................ 32 FIGURE 17 ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE IMAGES: TRANSMILENIO BRT SYSTEM, BOGOTA, COLUMBIA ................................................ 33 FIGURE 18 STRATEGIES FOR TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT AND ENCOURAGING TRANSIT RIDERSHIP .................................................................. 35 List of Tables TABLE 1 SUGGESTED TRANSIT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CPHX STUDY AREA ............................................................................... 4 TABLE 2 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) PROGRAMS FOR TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT ................................................................. 37 TABLE 2 ‐ FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) PROGRAMS FOR TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT (CONTINUED)............................................ 38 DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Page ii of ii Transit Service Improvement Strategies September, 2013 CENTRAL PHOENIX TRANSPORTATION FRAMEWORK STUDY Technical Memorandum: Transit Service Improvement Strategies 1.0 Overview Recent rapid growth of the Phoenix metropolitan area and its core cities and expected future growth creates a dilemma for the region. As the cities grow larger, opportunities for work, education, and housing increase, which is good, but often these opportunities generally are widely dispersed and, even more so, not related geographically. The result is that the regional transportation system has become automobile focused, as individuals travel “across town” for work,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annual Regional Park-And-Ride System
    2019 ANNUAL REGIONAL PARK & RIDE SYSTEM REPORT JANUARY 2020 Prepared for: Metropolitan Council Metro Transit Minnesota Valley Transit Authority SouthWest Transit Maple Grove Transit Plymouth Metrolink Northstar Link Minnesota Department of Transportation Prepared by: Ari Del Rosario Metro Transit Engineering and Facilities, Planning and Urban Design Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................................3 Capacity Changes........................................................................................................................................6 System Capacity and Usage by Travel Corridor .........................................................................................7 Planned Capacity Expansion .......................................................................................................................8 About the System Survey ............................................................................................................................9 Appendix A: Facility Utilization Data .......................................................................................................10 Park & Ride System Data .....................................................................................................................10 Park & Pool System Data .....................................................................................................................14 Bike & Ride
    [Show full text]
  • BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States
    BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States By: Andrew Degerstrom September 2018 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................1 Economic Development and Transit-Oriented Development ...................2 Definition of Bus Rapid Transit .................................................................2 Literature Review ..................................................................................3 BRT Economic Development Outcomes ...................................................3 Factors that Affect the Success of BRTOD Implementation .....................5 Case Studies ...........................................................................................7 Cleveland HealthLine ................................................................................7 Pittsburgh Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway East Liberty Station ..... 11 Pittsburgh Uptown-Oakland BRT and the EcoInnovation District .......... 16 BRTOD at home, the rapid bus A Line and the METRO Gold Line .........20 Conclusion .............................................................................................23 References .............................................................................................24 Artist rendering of Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood and the Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway Introduction Purpose of this Report If Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    [Show full text]
  • Lakeville, Minnesota
    LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA ▪ This 29,362 square foot corporate headquarters facility features a flexible design utilizing extensive brick and glass. It has been the corporate home to Hearth and Home technologies, the world leader in hearth production and installation, since 2008. EXCLUSIVE OFFERING MEMORANDUM STEVE LYSEN First Vice President +1 952 924 4620 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS ..................................................4 PROPERTY INFORMATION ...................................................5 AERIALS ............................................................................... 6 SITE PLAN ............................................................................ 8 FLOOR PLAN ....................................................................... 9 TENANT & LEASE SUMMARY ..............................................11 CASH FLOW ...................................................................... 12 AREA SUMMARY ................................................................13 MARKET OVERVIEW ...........................................................14 INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL MSA NATIONAL RANKINGS CBRE has been retained as the exclusive marketing advisor for the disposition MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL, MN NATIONAL RANK of the Hearth & Home Technologies headquarters building, located in GDP per Capita 10 Lakeville, Minnesota. This 29,362 square foot corporate headquarters facility Per Capita Personal Income 10 was built in 2007 and is 100% occupied. Fortune 500 Companies 5 Employment
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Simulation of Intervention Strategies Against Bus Bunching by Means of an Empirical Agent‑Based Model
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Analysis and simulation of intervention strategies against bus bunching by means of an empirical agent‑based model Quek, Wei Liang; Chung, Ning Ning; Saw, Vee‑Liem; Chew, Lock Yue 2021 Quek, W. L., Chung, N. N., Saw, V. & Chew, L. Y. (2021). Analysis and simulation of intervention strategies against bus bunching by means of an empirical agent‑based model. Complexity, 2021. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2606191 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146829 https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2606191 © 2021 Wei Liang Quek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Downloaded on 30 Sep 2021 12:08:52 SGT Hindawi Complexity Volume 2021, Article ID 2606191, 24 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2606191 Research Article Analysis and Simulation of Intervention Strategies against Bus Bunching by means of an Empirical Agent-Based Model Wei Liang Quek,1 Ning Ning Chung,2 Vee-Liem Saw ,3,4 and Lock Yue Chew 3,4,5 1School of Humanities, Nanyang Technological University, 639818, Singapore 2Centre for University Core, Singapore University of Social Sciences, 599494, Singapore 3Division of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 637371, Singapore 4Data Science & Artificial Intelligence Research Centre, Nanyang Technological University, 639798, Singapore 5Complexity Institute, Nanyang Technological University, 637723, Singapore Correspondence should be addressed to Lock Yue Chew; [email protected] Received 27 April 2020; Revised 8 August 2020; Accepted 3 September 2020; Published 8 January 2021 Academic Editor: Tingqiang Chen Copyright © 2021 Wei Liang Quek et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Transit a Line 2017 Snapshot
    Metro Transit A Line 2017 Snapshot Metro Transit’s first rapid bus line, the Snelling A Line, opened in June 2016. The A Line Rosedale Center Rosedale Transit Center HWY provides faster, more frequent service 36 along Snelling Avenue, Ford Parkway County Rd B and 46th Street, connecting the Snelling & County Road B METRO Blue and Green lines and Har Mar Mall A Line (Rapid Bus Line) several other destinations. ROSEVILLE METRO Green Line (Light Rail) METRO Blue Line (Light Rail) Trips run every 10 minutes most of the Larpenteur Snelling & Larpenteur day, and service is sped up through a Shared Station combination of off-board fare payment, Snelling & Hoyt-Nebraska transit signal priority and limited stops. State Fairgrounds The A Line is the first of several planned Como Snelling & Como rapid bus lines that will bring faster, more Hamline frequent service to the region’s busiest ST PAUL University transit corridors. Snelling & Hewitt Minnehaha Snelling & Minnehaha Snelling & University 94 Snelling & Dayton Grand MISSISSIPPI RIVER Snelling & Grand Macalester College MINNEAPOLIS Snelling & St Clair • 13 Unique Buses Snelling & Randolph • Free Wi-Fi 46th Ave Fairview Cleveland • 2 wide doors 46th St Snelling & Highland 46th St4 Station6th St4 6th St Ford Pkwy • On-board real-time connecting Ford Ford Ford Ford & & & & & & schedule information Minnehaha46th Ave WoodlawnFinn Kenneth Fairview ST PAUL (new in 2018) metrotransit.org/a-line Corridor ridership grew 32% in the first year of A Line operations Corridor ridership by day of week, 2015-2017 10-mile line serving 4 cities Roseville, Falcon Heights, 4,200 St. Paul & Minneapolis 4,700 WEEKDAY 5,500 3,500 Top Ridership Stations (2017): 3,800 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Bunching Modelling and Control: a Passenger-Oriented Approach
    CASPT 2018 Extended Abstract Bus Bunching Modelling and Control: A Passenger-oriented Approach Dong Zhao Abstract Introduction Bus reliability is one of the crucial element that describe the performance of the bus system operation. Due to the unreliable transit environment as well as the flexible internal operation, bus irregularity increasingly becomes an issue, especially in big cities with a massive demand. The uncertain bus operation lead to an imbalance of demand and supplement which influences the efficiency and effectivity of this transit. This kind of unreliability enables our bus becomes less attractive comparing with other public transportation such as metro and train. Those well-timetable-based mode have the operational advantage of being separable from the other traffic and have a less likelihood of being interrupted by external influence factors such as traffic lights or road constructions, which seems to be more reliable for the passenger. Also, due to the reliable operation, the real-time information provided for passenger is more trustable and the passenger arriving pattern are more similar to the uniform pattern, which is proved can increase the level of service reliability. On the other hand, the part of the travel demand that should be satisfied by bus obliged to be reallocated to other transit mode. The decreases of the efficiency and comfortability because of this extra demand would even compel those affordable people to travel by private vehicles which may increase the road pressure. Therefore, it is essential to improve the reliability of the bus service. One of the measurement of the bus unreliability is the level and extent of bus bunching.
    [Show full text]
  • Headway Adherence. Detection and Reduction of the Bus Bunching Effect
    HEADWAY ADHERENCE. DETECTION AND REDUCTION OF THE BUS BUNCHING EFFECT Josep Mension Camps Director Central Services and Deputy Chief Officer of Bus Network. Transports Metropolitans de Barcelona (TMB). Miquel Estrada Romeu Associate Professor. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya- BarcelonaTECH. 1. INTRODUCTION Transit systems should provide a good performance to compete against the wide usage of cars in metropolitan areas. The level of service of these systems relies on a proper temporal and spatial coverage provision (high frequencies, low stop spacings) as well as significant regularity and comfort. In this way, bus systems in densely populated cities usually operate at short headways (10 minutes or less). However, in these busy routes, any delay suffered by a single bus is propagated to the whole bus fleet. This fact causes vehicle bunching and unstable time-headways. In real bus lines, we usually see that two or more vehicles arrive together or in close succession, followed by a long gap between them. There are many sources of potential external disruptions in the service of one bus: illegal parking in the bus lane, failure in the doors opening system, traffic jams, etc. However, some intrinsic characteristics of transit systems and traffic management may also induce delays at specific vehicles such as traffic signal coordination and irregular passenger arrivals at stops. These facts make the bus motion unstable. Therefore, bus bunching is a common problem in the real operation of buses all over the world that must be addressed. The crucial issue is that bus bunching has a great impact on both users and agency cost. From a passenger perspective, the bus bunching phenomena increases the travel time of passengers (riding and waiting time) and worsens the vehicle occupancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Transit Study
    Report Mass Transit Study Edmonton’s Future Mass Transit Network Prepared for City of Edmonton by IBI Group February – 2020 IBI GROUP REPORT MASS TRANSIT STUDY Prepared for City of Edmonton Table of Contents Glossary/Abbreviations Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 Mass Transit Network Development ................................................................................. 5 2.1 Network Development Process ............................................................................... 5 2.2 Business as Planned - BAP ..................................................................................... 7 2.3 Categories of Mass Transit Modes .......................................................................... 9 2.4 Mass Transit Network ............................................................................................ 11 2.5 City Plan Land Use – Nodes and Corridors ........................................................... 14 2.6 City-wide Routes Concept ..................................................................................... 16 2.7 District Routes Concept ......................................................................................... 21 2.8 Success Factors ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Express Bus Routes Design with Limited-Stop Services for Long-Distance Commuters
    sustainability Article Optimal Express Bus Routes Design with Limited-Stop Services for Long-Distance Commuters Hongguo Ren 1,2, Zhenbao Wang 1,2,* and Yanyan Chen 3 1 School of Architecture and Art, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, Hebei, China; [email protected] 2 Key Laboratory of Architectural Physical Environment and Regional Building Protection Technology, Handan 056038, Hebei, China 3 School of Urban Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 December 2019; Accepted: 21 February 2020; Published: 23 February 2020 Abstract: This research aimed to propose a route optimization method for long-distance commuter bus service to improve the attraction of public transport as a sustainable travel mode. Takingthe express bus services (EBS) in Changping Corridor in Beijing as an example, we put forward an EBS route-planning method for long-distance commuter based on a solving algorithm for vehicle routing problem with pickups and deliveries (VRPPD) to determine the length of routes, number of lines, and stop location. Mobile phone location (MPL) data served as a valid instrument for the origin–destination (OD) estimation, which provided a new perspective to identify the locations of homes and jobs. The OD distribution matrices were specified via geocoded MPL data. The optimization objective of the EBS is to minimize the total distance traveled by the lines, subject to maximum segment capacity constraints. The sensitivity analysis was done to several key factors (e.g., the segment capacity, vehicle capacity, and headway) influencing the number of lines, the length of routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit
    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiline Bus Bunching Control Via Vehicle Substitution
    Transportation Research Part B 126 (2019) 68–86 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transportation Research Part B journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/trb Multiline Bus Bunching Control via Vehicle Substitution ∗ Antoine Petit, Chao Lei, Yanfeng Ouyang Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Traditional bus bunching control methods (e.g., adding slack to schedules, adapting cruis- Received 2 August 2018 ing speed), in one way or another, trade commercial speed for better system stability and, Revised 13 April 2019 as a result, may impose the burden of additional travel time on passengers. Recently, a dy- Accepted 20 May 2019 namic bus substitution strategy, where standby buses are dispatched to take over service Available online 6 June 2019 from late/early buses, was proposed as an attempt to enhance system reliability without Keywords: sacrificing too much passenger experience. This paper further studies this substitution Bus bunching strategy in the context of multiple bus lines under either time-independent or time- Transit reliability varying settings. In the latter scenario, the fleet of standby buses can be dynamically Approximate dynamic programming utilized to save on opportunity costs. We model the agency’s substitution decisions and Multiline control retired bus repositioning decisions as a stochastic dynamic program so as to obtain the optimal policy that minimizes the system-wide costs. Numerical results show that the dynamic substitution strategy can benefit from the “economies of scale” by pooling the standby fleet across lines, and there are also benefits from dynamic fleet management when transit demand varies over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Block Signalling 8 Moving Block Signalling and Capacity 8 Virtual Fixed Block Signalling 9
    POSTbrief Number 20, 26 April 2016 Moving Block By Lydia Harriss Signalling Inside: Summary 2 Railway Signalling in the UK 3 The European Rail Traffic Management System 4 Operating at ETCS Levels 2 and 3 7 Moving Block Signalling 8 Moving Block Signalling and Capacity 8 Virtual Fixed Block Signalling 9 www.parliament.uk/post | 020 7219 2840 | [email protected] | @POST_UK Cover image: The ERTMS/ETCS Signalling System, Maurizio POSTbriefs are responsive policy briefings from the Parliamentary Office of Science Palumbo, Railwaysignalling.eu, and Technology based on mini literature reviews and peer review. 2014 2 Moving Block Signalling Summary Network Rail is developing a programme for the national roll-out of the Euro- pean Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS), using European Train Control System (ETCS) Level 2 signalling technology, within 25 years. It is also under- taking work to determine whether ETCS Level 3 technology could be used to speed up the deployment of ERTMS to within 15 years. Implementing ERTMS with ETCS Level 3 has the potential to increase railway route capacity and flexibility, and to reduce both capital and operating costs. It would also make it possible to manage rail traffic using a moving block signal- ling approach. This POSTbrief introduces ERTMS, explains the concept of moving block sig- nalling and discusses the potential benefits for rail capacity, which are likely to vary significantly between routes. Research in this area is conducted by a range of organizations from across in- dustry, academia and Government. Not all of the results of that work are publi- cally available. This briefing draws on information from interviews with experts from academia and industry and a sample of the publically available literature.
    [Show full text]