HERITAGE STATEMENT FOR FARM 944/2, NOORDHOEK, SIMONSTOWN MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT,

(Assessment conducted under Section 38 (8) of the National Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999) as part of an EIA)

Prepared for

Sillito Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 30134, Tokai, 7966 Tel: (021) 712 5060 Fax: (021) 712 5061 Email: [email protected]

25 June 2009

Prepared by

Jayson Orton

Archaeology Contracts Office Department of Archaeology University of Private Bag 7701

Phone (021) 650 2357 Fax (021) 650 2352 Email Jayson [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Archaeology Contracts Office was requested by SHlito Environmental Consulting to assess Portion 2 of Farm 944, Noordhoek. The site is the subject of a land claim and the claimants are seeking single residential development. The site is currently zoned single residential and is 2.5969 ha in extent. It would need to be subdivided and possibly rezoned to allow the desired development but, due to various constraints on the site, final plans have yet to be made.

Part of the site has a sandy substrate covered by a mix of grass, indigenous shrubs and exotic trees . The remainder of the site is under marsh land. The sandy area is gently undulating and may have had sand dredged from the salt pan dumped on it.

No archaeological or palaeontological material was noted and none of significance is expected to occur. The only cultural landscape elements present are several gum trees but these do not appear to be very old. They are assigned low significance.

Visual impacts of moderate significance will occur, particularly as seen from Ou Kaapse Weg (M64), but these are over a small area and should be seen in light of the recent neighbouring developments which have imparted very high visual impacts. Visual impacts on Farm 944/2 can easily be mitigated.

Subject to the approval of Heritage Western Cape, the proposed development should be allowed to proceed but subject to the following conditions: • The tall gum trees on site should be retained if possible but this is not mandatory; • New indigenous trees should be planted among the houses to recreate the sense of place typical of the Noordhoek Valley and to reduce visual impacts from Ou Kaapse Weg; • A high density of housing should not be immediately visible from the Noordhoek Main Road; • It is strongly recommended that buildings be kept to a single storey only; • Sensib le colours and fabrics should be used to avoid excessive contrasts with the natural surroundings; and • Should any human remains be uncovered at any stage in the development, work in the immediate vicinity should cease and they should be reported to the archaeologist at Heritage Western Cape on (021) 483 9685.

2 Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ...... 4 2. HERITAGE LEGISLATION ...... 4 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ...... 5 4. HERITAGE CONTEXT ...... 6 5. METHODS ...... 7 5.1. Limitations ...... 7 6. FINDINGS ...... 8 6.1. Archaeology and palaeontology ...... 8 6.2. Cultural landscape elements ...... 8 6.3. Visual impacts and scenic routes ...... 8 7. CONCLUSiONS ...... 8 8. RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 8 9. REFERENCES ...... 9

3 1. INTRODUCTION

The Archaeology Contracts Office was requested by Sillito Environmental Consulting to assess Portion 2 of Farm 944, Noordhoek, in the Simonstown Magisterial District (Figure 1). The site Is the subject of a land claim and the claimants are seeking single residential development if possible. The site is currently zoned single residential and is 2.5969 ha in extent. It would need to be subdivided and possibly rezoned to allow the desired development but, due to various constraints on the site, final plans have yet to be made. These will be gUided by the specialist studies.

CHAPMAN'S SA Y

,""" .•-.d

; 34 1 ~~B ~ q 'pa pe Peninsula (Mappi ng i nfo rm~tit>n,s~ pplied by - Chief''.".." ,'" :, Oirec~q~t~: Surveys ~ n d Mapping. We bsite:'W3~.~ ;~ p e .gov .za ) " 3 oo-.1..,"l ,- ~ -... ~ - 1 ~ ~ "O

Figure 1: Map of the Noordhoek Valley showing the location of the site (red polygon).

2. HERITAGE LEGISLATION

The National Heritage Resources Act (NHRA) No. 25 of 1999 protects a variety of heritage resources including palaeontological, prehistoric and historical material (including ruins) more than 100 years old (Section 35), human remains (Section 36) and non-ruined structures older than 60 years (Section 34). Landscapes with cultural significance are also protected under the definition of the National Estate (Section 3 (3.2d)). Under Section 38 (1) of the act the 2 affected property requires heritage assessment based on its size of greater than 5000 m .

4 Since the project is subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment, Heritage Western Cape (HWC) is required to provide comment on the proposed project in order to facilitate final decision making by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DEA&DP) .

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

The site is a long, narrow property covered in dense Kikuyu grass, indigenous bushes and exotic trees and with a gravel road running along the length of the northwest side (Figures 2 to 5). Sopme of the surface is gently undulating. Part of the site is a wetland and has dense, waterlogged reed beds, while the rest has a sandy substrate. A cluster of large gum trees occurs on the central part of the property (Figure 6). A view over the site indicating its physical context is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 2: The gravel access road along the north­ Figure 3: Grass and bush on the site. western edge of the property.

Figure 4: Indigenous vegetation on site. Figure 5: Grass and bush on the site.

5 Figure 6: The group of large blue gum trees in the middle area of the property. The wetland area is visible through the trees to the right.

Figure 7: View of the site from Ou Kaapse Weg. The approximate boundaries are shown by the red dotted polygon. Note that the wetland (the large brown areas) extends onto the site behind the tall trees (see Figure 8) .

4. HERITAGE CONTEXT

Stone Age artefacts and sites of varying age have been recorded in the Noordhoek valley in the past (Goodwin & Van Riet Lowe 1929; Olivier n.d.; Orton 2004; Orton & Hart 2005; Rudner 1968) and tend to be in the low lying areas behind the beach or near the old salt pan (now dredged to create Lake Michelle). Aside from Peers Cave in the hill some 2.3 kilometres east of the property, no academic research has taken place in the valley. Little is thus known of the archaeology in the immediate area. However, with the historical farming that occurred in the valley and the dredging of the salt pan, it seems unlikely that any intact archaeology would be present near the study site.

6 Historical use of the valley goes back more than two centuries but no old structures are present in the nearby vicinity. Older buildings and ruins are known in the heart of Noordhoek between one and three kilometres to the northwest (Finnegan & Orton 2008; Orton 2007, 2009) but all structures in the vicinity of the site appear to be relatively modern.

A number of large blue gum trees do occur in the area immediately to the east of the site and a few extend onto the site. These trees are mature but are probably not very old.

Modern residential development occurs to the east, north and southwest of the site, while marsh land is present to the southeast and west (Figure 8).

Figure 8: Aerial view of the site and its surroundings taken from Google Earth. Site indicated by the red polygon. The uniform green surface on and extending from the southern end of the site is all marshland.

5. METHODS

The site was surveyed on 22 June 2009. Relevant features were photographed.

5.1. Limitations

Due to dense vegetation and waterlogged marshland much of the surface of the site could not be examined. Several sandy areas were noted in the grass and these were checked for artefacts. The fact that these areas were frequently slightly mounded suggests that they might even relate to the dredging of the salt pan.

7 6. FINDINGS

6.1. Archaeology and palaeontology

No evidence of any archaeological material is present and the context suggests that significant palaeontological material is unlikely to be present. Should any archaeological remains be present they are highly unlikely to be in situ and would thus be of low value.

Unmarked prehistoric human burials can be found anywhere, particularly in sandy deposits and the potential, albeit small, does exist for burials to be uncovered on this site.

6.2. Cultural landscape elements

The large gum trees might be considered a cultural landscape element, although they are unlikely to be of any significant age and are assigned low significance. However, they do impart character and sense of place to the area and contribute to the green atmosphere for which the Noordhoek Valley is so well known.

6.3. Visual impacts and scenic routes

The site does not border directly onto Noordhoek Main Road (M6), which means that any development there will not have a major visual impact on that scenic route . It will be very highly visible from certain points on Ou Kaapse Weg (M64) which runs up the mountain to the north of the site. It is, however, true that other recent developments to the west constitute massive visual impacts to both these scenic routes and that Farm 944/2 has only a very small developable area in comparison. The higher the density of development, though, the greater the impact will be. The possible visual impacts in total are assigned moderate significance. Should the tall gum trees on site be retained then these will provide a visual screen which will hide some of the proposed development and reduce impacts. Alternatively new trees can be planted in more suitable locations to break up the cluster of houses that may be built.

7. CONCLUSIONS

Development of the site will not have any significant impacts to palaeontology, archaeology or important cultural landscape elements. However a moderate visual impact will be experienced. This impact can be mitigated through tree planting and the use of sensible colouring and building fabrics. Retention of the tall trees on site would go a long way towards retaining some of the sense of place and reducing visual impacts. Planting of new trees would help visually to reduce the apparent density of houses and retain the character of the area.

8. RECOMMENDATIONS

Subject to the approval of Heritage Western Cape, the proposed development should be allowed to proceed but subject to the following conditions: • The tall gum trees on site should be retained if possible but this is not mandatory;

8 • New indigenous trees should be planted among the houses to recreate the sense of place typical of the Noordhoek Valley and to reduce visual impacts from Ou Kaapse Weg; • A high density of housing should not be immediately visible from the Noordhoek Main Road ; • It is strongly recommended that buildings be kept to a single storey only; • Sensible colours and fabrics should be used to avoid excessive contrasts with the natural surroundings; and • Should any human remains be uncovered at any stage in the development, work in the immediate vicinity should cease and they should be reported to the archaeologist at Heritage Western Cape on (021) 483 9685.

9. REFERENCES

Finnegan, E. & Orton, J. 2008 . Heritage impact assessment of the Remainder of Farm 938, Noordhoek. Unpublished report prepared for Nkoi Place of the Leopard Resort (Pty) Ltd. Archaeology Contracts Office: .

Goodwin, A.J .H. & Van Riet Lowe , C. 1929. The Stone Age cultures of . Annals of the South African Museum 27: 1-289.

Olivier, A. n.d. The archaeological survey of the . Unpublished Honours Project, University of Cape Town .

Orton , J. 2004. Initial heritage impact assessment of small areas at Lake Michelle, Noordhoek. Unpublished report prepared for Andre van der Spuy Environmental Consultants cc. Archaeology Contracts Office: University of Cape Town .

Orton, J. 2007. Supporting documentation for Notification of Intent to Develop, Portion 6 of Farm 933, Noordhoek, Simonstown Magisterial District. Unpublished report prepared for CCA Environmental (Pty) Ltd Archaeology Contracts Office : University of Cape Town.

Orton , J. 2009. Archaeological impact assessment of a ruined structure on Rem erf 329, Noordhoek, Simonstown Magisterial District, Western Cape . Unpublished report prepared for William Robson. Archaeology Contracts Office: University of Cape Town .

Orton , J. & Hart, T. 2005. Heritage statement and AlA Extension 4 Erf 4198 Sunnydale. Unpublished report prepared for Chand Environmental. Archaeology Contracts Office: University of Cape Town .

Rudner, J. 1968. Strandloper pottery from South and Southwest Africa. Annals of the South African Museum: 49: 441-663.

9 I Draft 3: 02/2006 I

Heritage Western Cape

Notification of Intent to Develop Section 38 ofthe National Heritage Resources Act (Act No . 25, 1999)

Section 38 of the National Heritage Resources Act requires that any person who intends to undertake certain categories of development in the Western Cape (see Part 1) must notify Heritage Western Cape at the very earliest stage of initiating such a development and must furnish details of the location, nature and extent ofthe proposed development.

This form is designed to assist the developer to provide the necessary information to enable Heritage Western Cape to decide whether a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) will be required, and to establish the appropriate scope of and range of skills required for the IDA.

Note: This form must be completed wben the proposed development does not fnlfil the criteria for Environmental Impact Assessment as set ont in the EIA regulations. Its completion is recommended as part of the EIA process to assist in establishing the requirements of Heritage Western Cape witb respect to the heritage component of the EIA.

1. It is recommended that the form be completed by a professional familiar with heritage conservation issues. 2. The completion of Section 7 by heritage specialists is not mandatory, but is recommended in order to expedite decision-making at notification stage. IfSection 7 is completed: • Section 7.1 must be completed by a professional heritage practitioner with skills and experience appropriate to the nature of the property and the development proposals. • Section 7.2 must be completed by a professional archaeologist or palaeontologist. • Each page of the form mnst be signed by the heritage practitioner and archaeologist! palaeontologist. 3. Additional information may be provided on separate sheets. 4. This form is available in electronic format so that it can be completed on computer.

OFFICIAL USE Date received: I ResDonse date:

1 PART 1: BASE INFORMATI ON

1.1 PROPERTY

Name of property

Street address or location Off M6 (Noordhoek Main Road) (e.g. off R44) Erf or farm numberls Portion 2 of Farm 944

Town or District Noordhoek

Responsible Local Authority

Magisterial District Simonstown

Current use Vacant

Current zoning Single residential

Predominant land use of Residential surrou nding properties Extent of the property 2.5969 ha

1.2 CATEGORY OF DEVELOPMENT X Brief description of the nature and extent of (S. 38 (1)) the proposed development or activity (See also Part 3.1) 1. Construction of a road, wa ll, powerlin e, pipeline, canal or other similar form of linear Rezoning and subdivision to allow for the deve lopment or barrier over 300m in length construction of single residentia i dwellings. 2. Construction of a bridge or similar structure The site is the subject of a land claim by 41 exceedino 50 m in length co-ciaimants. Due to significant development 3. Any developme nt or activity that will change the constraints (a large area of marsh iand) on character of a site- site, no final plans for subdivision or a) exceed ing 5 000 m in extent X development have been made . These will be • _0_ ____ •______••_ . _ ••• •_ •• •• •• .•• _____.•_.______I-- guided by specialist studies. b) involving three or more existing erven or subdivisions thereof c) involving three or more erven or divisions thereof which have been consol idated within the past five years 4. Rezon ing of a site exceed ing 10 000 m" X 5. Other (state)

1.3 INITIATION STAGE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Exploratory (e.g. viability study) X Notes: Conceptual see above. Outline proposals Draft I Sketch plans Other (state)

2 I

PART 2: HERITAGE ISSUES

2.1 CONTEXT X (check box ofall relevant categories) Brief description/explanation X Urban environmental context While much of the area has already been developed for housing (predominantly upmarket), the immediate Rural environmental context surroundings of the study area are natural and X Natural environmental context comprise mostly of wetlands.

Formal protection (NHRA) is the property part of a protected area IS .2Si? Is the property part of a heritage area (S.31 )? Other Is the property near to or visible from anv orotected heritaae sites? Is the property part of a conservation area or special area in terms ofthe Zonina Scheme? Does the site form part of an historical settlement or townscaoe? Does the site form part of a rural cultural landscape? Does the site form part of a natural landscape of cultural significance? X The M6 is definitely a scenic route in this area although the recent insensitive developments around the northwest edge of Lake Michelle have reduced the Is the site within or adjacent to a sceni c visual qualities of the landscape as seen from this route? route. It should also be note that the site is very visible from Ou Kaapse Weg (M62) which is also an important scenic route. Is the property within or adjacent to any other area which has special environmental or heritaae protection? Do the general context or any adjoining properties have cuitural sianificance'?

2.2 PROPERTY FEATURES AND CHARACTERISTICS X (check box if YES) Brief description Has the site been previously cultivated Part is extensively disturbed and contains dumped X or developed? building and other rubble . Are there any significant landscape features on the orooertv? Are there any sites or features of geological significance on the orooertv? Does the property have any rocky outcrops on it? Does the property have any fresh wa ter X sources (springs , streams , rivers) on or Part of the property is wetland. alongside it? Does the property have any sea fron tage? Does the property form part of a coastal dune svstem?

3 Are there any marine shell heaps or scatters on the orooertv? Is the property or part thereof on land red aimed from the sea?

2.3 HERITAGE RESOURCES2 ON THE PROPERTY X (check box if present on the property) Name I List I Brief description Formal protections (NHRA) National heritage site (5 . 27) Provincial heritage site (S. 27) Provisional protection (s.29) Place listed in heritage register (5 . 30) Generat protections (NHRA) structures older than 60 years (5. 34) ? archaeo logical' site or material (5 . 35) MSA and LSA artefacts are known in the nearby vicinity and might well occur here although their context would be meaningless. palaeontological site or material (5 . 35) graves or burial grounds (S. 36) public monuments or memorials' (S. 37) Other Any heritage resource identified in a heritage survey (state author and date of survev and survev cradi nq/s) Any other heritage resources (describe)

2.4 PROPERTY HISTORY AND ASSOC IATIONS X (check box if YES) Brief description/explanation Provide a brief history of the property Portion 2 of Farm Lot B (Farm number 944) Noordhoek (e.g. when granted, previous owners was acquired in equal shares by George Darries and uses). Daniels and his son, Carl David Daniels by Deed of Transfer T3361 dated 26 March 1943. George Darries Daniels and his family had in fact, leased the land in question since 1930, using it to farm a market garden and for residential purposes.

Is the property associated with any important persons or grouos? Is the property associated with any important events , activities or public memorv? Does the property have any direct association with the history of slavery? Is the property associated with or used for living heritage' ? ? Are there any oral traditions attached to Unknown at this stage but, given the land claim, this is

4 I

D the property? I possible.

2.6 SUMMARY OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROPERTY (OR ANY PART OFTHEPROPERTYI IS. 313ll X (check box ofall relevant categories) Brief description/explanation Important in the community or pattern of South Afric a's (or Western Cape's, or locall history. Associated with the life or work of a person, group o r organisation of importance in history. Associated with the history of slavery. ? Strong or special association with a The property is subject to a land claim but further particular community or cultural group for detaiis of this claim are unknown at this stage. This social, cultural or spiritual reasons cateoorv of sionificance mav aoolv, Exhibits particular aesthetic characteristics valued bv a communitv or cultural orouo Demonstrates a high degree of creative o r technical achievement at a particular period Has potential to yield information that will contribute to an understanding of natural or cultural heritage Typi ca l: Demonstrates the principal characteristics of a particular class of natural or cultural olaces Rare: Possesses uncommon, rare or en- dangered aspects of natural or cultural heritaoe Please provide a brief statement of significance There is nothing of heritage significance on the site . However, visual impacts of moderate significance may occur.

PART 3: POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT

3.1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Brief description of proposed Rezoning and subdivision to allow for the construction of single development residential dwellinqs. Monetary value Anticipated starting date Anticipated duration of work Does it involve change in land use? yes . Extent of land coverage of the Unknown due to significant development constraints on site . proposed development This wiil be determined at a later stage in the process. Does it require the provision of yes . add itional services? (e.g. roads, seweraoe, water, electricitv) Does it involve excavation or earth yes. moving?

5 Does it involve landscaping? yes (land reclamation from the wetland will probably be required) . Does it involve construction work? yes. What is the total floor area? How many storeys including parking? Unknown at this stage. What is the maximum height above Unknown at this stage. natural oround level? 3.2 POTENTIAL IMPACT What impact will the proposed A significant change in character would take place with the development have on the heritage change from natural landscape to residential area. Some values of the context of the property? visual impact will occur, particularly from the scenic Ou (e.s. visibility, change in character)' Kaapse Weg which lies on the hill above the site. Are any heritage resources listed in If Stone Age artefacts are present they will already be highly Part 2 affected by the proposed disturbed and further disturbance is not significant in any way. develooment? If so, how? Please summarise any public/social benefits of the proposed development.

The site is subject to a land claim by 41 co-clai mants. The proposed project would provide much needed housing in the area for the community concerned and restore land to a family that was displaced during the apartheid years .

PART 4: POLICY, PLANNING AND LEGAL CONTEXT

X (check box if YES) Details/explanation Does the proposed development conform Zoned Single residen tial and will be used for that with approved regional and local planning purpose oolicies? (e.c. SDF, Sectoral Plans) Does the development require any To early to say : Rezoning application to be departures or consent use in terms of the submitted Zoning Scheme? Has an application been submitted to the No Yet olanning authoritv? Has their comment or approval been Not Yet obtained? (attach ccovi Is planning permission required for any Yes : Subdivision subdivision or consolidation? r-- - --_.- ....-•...... •.._--- .-- - - ... .._.._--..~ - ...... -. . -- Has an application been submitted to the Not y et ------planninq authority? Has their comment or approval been Not Yet obtained? (attach coovl Are there title deed restrictions linked to the Not Yet established orooertv? Does the property have any special Specialist studies are being undertaken which will conservation status? provide information on this Are there any other restrictions on the Physical: undulated terrain property? Is the proposed development subject to the No: the development requires Environmental EIA regulations of the Environment Authorisation in terms of the 2006 EIA regulations Conservation Act (Act 73 of 1989)? in terms of the NEMA (Act 107 of 1998) Based on the information currently available on the proposed development, ~ is anticipated that the following Listed Activities contained in the EIA regulations, Government Notice No. R. 386, - necessitates the need to undertake a Basic

6 Assessment Process in terms of NEMA: 0 Activity 1 (k), which refers to the "buik transportation of sewage and water, including stonm water, in pipelines with- an intemal diameter of 0.36 metres or more a peak throughput of 120 litres per second or more". 0 Activity 4 which refers to "The dredging, excavation, infilling, removal or moving of soil, sand or rock exceeding 5 cubic metres from a river, tidal lagoon, tidal river, lake, in-stream dam, fioodplain or wetland " 0 Activity 15, which refers to "the construction of a road that is wider that 4 metres or that has a reserve wider than 6 metres, excluding roads that fall within the ambit of another listed activity or which are access roads of less that 30 metres long" 1 Activ ity 16 (b), which refers to "the transfonmation of undeveloped, vacant or derelict land to residential, mixed, retail, commercial, industrial or institutional use where such development does not constitute infill and where the total area to be transfonmed is bigger than 1 hectare" 2 Activity 20 which refers to "the transformation of an area zoned for use as public open space or for a conservation purpose to another use" Other listed activities may be identified once more informat ion on the proposed development becomes available f----- . ... _._ .. - •..._--_.._-_ ..__.- ....._. . - ._-I--"-=c- ' -- - - -.------...... -- -- ..._-_._. Has an application (or environmental A Notice of Intent to Apply has not yet been checkist) been submitted to DEA&DP What submitted i're the requirements of DEA&DP? f-- At what stage in the IEM proces s is the The application process for environmental application (scoping phase, EIA etc.) authorisation in terms of the 2006 EIA regulations in terms of the NEMA has not vet beoun Has any assessment of the heritage impact of the proposed development been under- taken in terms of the EIA or planning _process? - Are any such studies currentiy being undertaken? Is approval from any other authority Transport: possibility reouired? Has perm ission for similar development on No this site been refused by any authority in the past? Have interested and affected bodies have LUPO : to be advertised been consulted? Please list them and The public participation process for the application attach anv resoonses. for environmental authorisation has not vet becun

7 PARTS: APPLICANT DETAILS

REGISTERED PROPERTY OWNER Daniels Family Trust (Contact: George Daniels) NB: Applicant is Regional Land Claims Commission on the Restitution of Name Land Rights. Western Cape (RLCC)(contact: Zodwa Hardy) who are applvinq on behalf of the Daniels Family Trust Address 33 Comet Road, Ocean View, 7975 Telephone 021 7830066 Fax n/a E-mail n/a Signature I Date I 24.06.2009

DEVELOPER Name Daniels Family Trust (Contact: George Daniels) Address 33 Comet Road, Ocean View, 7975 Telephone 02 1 7830066 Fax n/a E-mail n/a Signature I Date I 24.06.2009

PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING THE FORM 1. Kobus Scott (Prokonsort) Name 2. Colleen McCreadie (Sillito Environmenta l Consultantantsl Address 1. P.O. Box 424. Goodwood , 7459 2. PO Box 30134. Tokai , 7966 1. Prokonsort : (021) 5916164 Telephone 2. SEC: (021) 712 5060 1. (021) 591 4004 Fax 2. (021) 712 5061 1. [email protected] E-mail 2. colleenlalenvironmentalconsultants.co.za Field of expertise 1. Town planner & Qualifications 2. Environmental consu ltant

Signature Date 24.06.2009

PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING THE FORM Name Jayson Orton Address Archaeology Contracts Office, Department of Archaeology, Beattie Building. Upper Campus, UCT, Private Bag. Rondebosch, 7701

Telephone (021) 650 2357 Fax (021) 650 2352

8 E-mail [email protected] Field of expertise MA (Archaeology), CRM work since 1999, ASAPA accredited. & ua lif ications

Signatu re Date 23 .06 .2009

PART 6: ATTACHMENTS x Plan, aerial photo and/or orthophoto clearly showing location and context of property. x Site plan or aerial photograph clearly indicating the position of all heritage resources and features. x Photographs of the site, showing its characteristics and heritage resources. Relevant sketch proposals, development plans, architectural and engineering drawings and landscaoino olans. Responses from other authorities. Responses from any interested and affected parties. Any archaeological reports or other reports that may have been carried out on the property or orooerties within the immediate area. Any other pertinent information to assist with decision-making.

PART 7. RECOMMENDATIONS BY HERITAGE SPEC IALISTS

7.1 RECOMMEN DATIONS OF GENERALIST HERITAGE PRACTITIONER Further investigation required Yes/No Describe issues and concerns Existing Conservation and No Plannino Documentation Planning No Urban Design No Built Environment No Architecture/building fabric Yes Development will need to incorporate earthy tones so as not to cause any excessive contrast between natural and urban environments. Single storey development is stronolv recommended . Cultural Landscape No Visual Impact Yes The potential for significant impacts to the adjacent scenic routes (M6 and M64) exists and might need to be assessed further. However, it is believed that adequate mitigation can be achieved through planting of trees and use of sensitive colours and buildina fabrics. History No Published Information Title Deeds Survey Archival Oral History

9 Social History \;lther specialist study (specify) No Public Consultation Yes This will form part of the overall environmental impact orocess. Specialist Groups Neighbours Open House Public Meeting Public Advert isement Other (specify) No further specialist No conservation studies required Alternative development options Alternatives, while potentially more friendly towards the and mitigation measures receiving environment, could be explored but are unlikely to be of use given the nature of the project (land daim). However, any alternatives that reduce density and increase green space should be encouraoed. No developmen t option No Given the nature of the developments to the immediate west and southwest of the study area some development here should be allowed. Heritage Impact Assessment No requ ired, co-ordinated by a aeneralist heritaae practitioner Development inappropriate No and should not be permitted. Further HIA not required. Other recomme ndations (use additional pages If necessary)

I have reviewed the property and the proposed development and this completed form and make the recommendations above.

Name of Heritage Practitioner Jayson Orton

Qualifications, field of expertise MA (Archaeology) , CRM work since 1999, ASAPA accredited.

Signature...... Date...... 23.06.2009......

7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS OF ARCHAEOLOGISTJPALAEONTOLOGIST Further investigation required Yes/No Describe issues and concerns Palaeontology No Pre-colonial archaeo logy No Historical archaeo logy No Industrial archaeoiogy No

10 No

I have reviewed the property and the proposed development and this completed form and make the recommendations above.

Name of Archaeolog isUPalaeontologist Jayson Orton

Qualifications, fieid of expertise MA (Archaeology), CRM work since 1999, ASAPA accredited .

Signature . . Date 23.06.2009 .

11 Notes:

Cultural significance means aesthetic, architectural , historical, scientific, social, spiritual , linguistic or technological value or significance .

2 Heritage resource means any place or object of cultural significance . "Place" includes - (a) a site, area or region; (b) a building or other structure which may include equipment, furniture, fittings and other articles associated with or connected with such building or other structure; (c) a group of buildings or other structures [and associated equipment, fittings, etc]; (d) an open space, including a public square, street or park; and (e) in relation to the management of a place, includes the immediate surroundings .

3 Archaeological means - (a) material remains resulting from human activity which are in a state of disuse and are in or on land and which are older than 100 years, including artefacts , human and hominid remains and artificial features and structures ; (b) rock art, being any fonm of painting, engraving or other graphic representation on a fixed rock surface or loose rock or stone, which was executed by human agency and which is older than 100 years, including any area within 10m of such representat ion; (c) wrecks , being any vessel or aircraft, or any part thereof, which was wrecked in South Africa or in the maritime zone of the Republic , any cargo, debris or artefacts found or associated therewith , which is older than 60 years or which Heritage Western Cape considers to be worthy of conservation; and (d) features , structures and artefacts associated with military history which are older than 75 years and the site on which they are found.

4 Palaeontological means any fossilised remains or fossil trace of animals or plants which lived in the geological past, other than fossil fuels or fossiliferous rock intended for industrial use, and any site which contains such fossilised remains or trace.

5 Public monuments and memorials means all monuments and memorials - (a) erected on land belonging to any branch of ... government or on land belonging to any organisation funded by or established in terms of the legislation of such a branch of government ; or (b) which were paid for by publlc subscription, government funds, or a public-spirited or military organisation, and are on land belonging to any private individual.

6 Living heritage means the intangible aspects of inherited culture, and may include cultural tradition , oral history, performance, rituai, popular memory , skills and techniques, indigenous knowledge systems and the holistic approach to nature, society and social relationships.

12