DOCSLIB.ORG

2005 Hurricane Season Impacts: Dade & Monroe Counties, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2005 Hurricane Season Impacts: Dade & Monroe Counties, Florida 2005 Hurricane Season Impacts: Dade & Monroe Counties, Florida POST-STORM BEACH CONDITIONS AND COASTAL IMPACT REPORT Hurricane Dennis Hurricane Katrina Hurricane Rita Hurricane Wilma Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resource Management Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems December 2005 Foreword The Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection is responsible for protection and management of Florida’s sandy beaches fronting the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic Ocean and the Straits of Florida, and the regulation of coastal development adjacent to those coastal beaches. The monitoring and assessment of hurricane impacts to Florida’s beaches and coastal construction and the preparation of post-storm recovery responses and management strategies are important elements of the Bureau’s responsibilities. This report provides documentation of the impacts of Hurricanes Dennis, Katrina, Rita, and Wilma on the south coast of Florida along Dade and Monroe County beaches. The report also provides preliminary recommendations for post-storm response activities. This report was prepared by the Coastal Engineering Section for the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems. The report was written by Ralph R. Clark, P.E., P.L.S., with major contributions and preparation of graphics by James LaGrone, Coastal Engineer, and additional contributions by Jennifer Koch, Coastal Geologist. Field data of beach and dune erosion and structural damage were obtained by Ralph Clark, James LaGrone, Jennifer Koch, and Guy Weeks. Aerial videography and oblique aerial photography were supplied by Stacey B. Roberts of PBS&J and Camera Copters, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION _________________________________ Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems i Table of Contents Hurricane Dennis Discussion.............................................................................................. 1 Hurricane Katrina Discussion............................................................................................. 3 Hurricane Rita Discussion .................................................................................................. 7 Hurricane Wilma Discussion ............................................................................................ 10 Post-storm Beach Conditions and Coastal Impact Summary and Overview.................... 14 Dade County ..................................................................................................................... 24 Hurricane Katrina Storm Effects and Erosion Conditions........................................ 25 Hurricane Rita Storm Effects and Erosion Conditions ............................................. 25 Hurricane Wilma Storm Effects and Erosion Conditions......................................... 27 Hurricane Katrina Storm Damage............................................................................. 28 Hurricane Rita Storm Damage.................................................................................. 29 Hurricane Wilma Storm Damage.............................................................................. 29 Monroe County ................................................................................................................. 32 Hurricane Dennis Storm Effects and Erosion Conditions ........................................ 33 Hurricane Katrina Storm Effects and Erosion Conditions........................................ 34 Hurricane Rita Storm Effects and Erosion Conditions ............................................. 34 Islamorada, Lower Matecumbe Key..................................................................... 34 Long Key State Park ............................................................................................. 34 Grassy Key............................................................................................................ 36 Curry Hammocks State Park, Little Crawl Key.................................................... 36 Coco Plum Beach.................................................................................................. 36 City of Key Colony Beach.................................................................................... 37 Sombrero Beach, Vaca Key.................................................................................. 37 Little Duck Key, Missouri Key, and Ohio Key .................................................... 37 Bahia Honda State Park ........................................................................................ 37 Long Beach, Big Pine Key.................................................................................... 38 Boca Chica Key .................................................................................................... 38 Key West Beaches ................................................................................................ 39 Ft. Zachary Taylor Historic State Park ................................................................. 40 Distal Sand Keys................................................................................................... 40 Hurricane Wilma Storm Effects and Erosion Conditions......................................... 41 Upper Keys ........................................................................................................... 43 Islamorada, Upper and Lower Matecumbe Key................................................... 43 Long Key State Park ............................................................................................. 44 ii Grassy Key and Toms Harbor Keys ..................................................................... 45 Curry Hammocks State Park, Little Crawl Key.................................................... 45 Coco Plum Beach.................................................................................................. 46 City of Key Colony Beach.................................................................................... 47 City of Marathon, Vaca Key and Tingler Island................................................... 49 Sombrero Beach, Vaca Key.................................................................................. 49 Little Duck Key, Missouri Key, and Ohio Key .................................................... 49 Bahia Honda State Park ........................................................................................ 50 West Summerland Key ......................................................................................... 52 Long Beach, Big Pine Key and Newfound Harbor Keys ..................................... 53 Sugarloaf Beach, Sugarloaf Key........................................................................... 53 Boca Chica Key .................................................................................................... 53 Key West Beaches ................................................................................................ 54 Sunset Key (formerly Tank Island)....................................................................... 59 Distal Sand Keys................................................................................................... 59 Dry Tortugas, including Loggerhead Key and Garden Key (Fort Jefferson)....... 59 Cape Sable ............................................................................................................ 59 Everglades Sloughs Debouchure (Shark River to Pavilion Key) ......................... 59 Hurricane Dennis Damage........................................................................................ 61 Hurricane Katrina Damage ....................................................................................... 62 Hurricane Rita Damage............................................................................................. 62 Islamorada............................................................................................................. 62 Long Key State Park ............................................................................................. 62 Curry Hammocks State Park................................................................................. 64 Coco Plum Beach.................................................................................................. 64 City of Key Colony Beach.................................................................................... 64 Bahia Honda State Park ........................................................................................ 64 Boca Chica Beach................................................................................................. 64 Key West............................................................................................................... 66 Fort Zachary Taylor Historic State Park............................................................... 67 Hurricane Wilma Damage ........................................................................................ 67 Upper Keys ........................................................................................................... 67 Islamorada............................................................................................................. 68 Long Key .............................................................................................................. 68 Long Key State Park ............................................................................................. 68 Grassy Key
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wind Speed-Damage Correlation in Hurricane Katrina
    JP 1.36 WIND SPEED-DAMAGE CORRELATION IN HURRICANE KATRINA Timothy P. Marshall* Haag Engineering Co. Dallas, Texas 1. INTRODUCTION According to Knabb et al. (2006), Hurricane Katrina Mehta et al. (1983) and Kareem (1984) utilized the was the costliest hurricane disaster in the United States to concept of wind speed-damage correlation after date. The hurricane caused widespread devastation from Hurricanes Frederic and Alicia, respectively. In essence, Florida to Louisiana to Mississippi making a total of three each building acts like an anemometer that records the landfalls before dissipating over the Ohio River Valley. wind speed. A range of failure wind speeds can be The storm damaged or destroyed many properties, determined by analyzing building damage whereas especially near the coasts. undamaged buildings can provide upper bounds to the Since the hurricane, various agencies have conducted wind speeds. In 2006, WSEC developed a wind speed- building damage assessments to estimate the wind fields damage scale entitled the EF-scale, named after the late that occurred during the storm. The National Oceanic Dr. Ted Fujita. The author served on this committee. and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, 2005a) Wind speed-damage correlation is useful especially conducted aerial and ground surveys and published a when few ground-based wind speed measurements are wind speed map. Likewise, the Federal Emergency available. Such was the case in Hurricane Katrina when Management Agency (FEMA, 2006) conducted a similar most of the automated stations failed before the eye study and produced another wind speed map. Both reached the coast. However, mobile towers were studies used a combination of wind speed-damage deployed by Texas Tech University (TTU) at Slidell, LA correlation, actual wind measurements, as well as and Bay St.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park
    Wilderness on the Edge: A History of Everglades National Park Robert W Blythe Chicago, Illinois 2017 Prepared under the National Park Service/Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement Table of Contents List of Figures iii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in Footnotes xv Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s 1 Chapter 2: Early Conservation Efforts in the Everglades 40 Chapter 3: The Movement for a National Park in the Everglades 62 Chapter 4: The Long and Winding Road to Park Establishment 92 Chapter 5: First a Wildlife Refuge, Then a National Park 131 Chapter 6: Land Acquisition 150 Chapter 7: Developing the Park 176 Chapter 8: The Water Needs of a Wetland Park: From Establishment (1947) to Congress’s Water Guarantee (1970) 213 Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project 237 Chapter 10: Wilderness Values and Wilderness Designations 270 Chapter 11: Park Science 288 Chapter 12: Wildlife, Native Plants, and Endangered Species 309 Chapter 13: Marine Fisheries, Fisheries Management, and Florida Bay 353 Chapter 14: Control of Invasive Species and Native Pests 373 Chapter 15: Wildland Fire 398 Chapter 16: Hurricanes and Storms 416 Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources 430 Chapter 18: Museum Collection and Library 449 Chapter 19: Relationships with Cultural Communities 466 Chapter 20: Interpretive and Educational Programs 492 Chapter 21: Resource and Visitor Protection 526 Chapter 22: Relationships with the Military
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricanes Katrina and Rita – Louisiana's Response And
    HURRICANES KATRINA AND RITA – LOUISIANA’S RESPONSE AND RECOVERY Ray A. Mumphrey, P.E., Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and Hossein Ghara, P.E., MBA, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, Louisiana KEYWORDS: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Contra flow, Inundation, Fixed and Movable Bridges, Open Water Bridges, Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority ABSTRACT: Louisiana’s transportation and hurricane protection system took a tremendous blow from two major hurricanes that struck the coast of Louisiana in 2005, hurricanes Katrina and Rita. This presentation will introduce the audience to the transportation infrastructure damage Louisiana experienced as a result of these two storms and will describe how Louisiana is responding to the disasters and our road to recovery. Figure 1 - Hurricanes that hit the coast of Louisiana since 1900 As Louisiana residents, we become accustom to the ever present threat of hurricanes. Refer to figure 1. Much like other parts of the country, which have other natural disasters such as tornados, mud slides, avalanches or earthquakes, we just prepare for the worst, minimize loss of life and property, and thank God when it’s all over. As engineers we know we can always rebuild structures, and possibly restore livelihoods, but loss of life is not replaceable. 2005 STORMS Hurricane Katrina was a category 4 storm when it made landfall on August 29, 2005, along the Louisiana – Mississippi Gulf Coast. The storm was fast moving and provided minimum time for preparation. Refer to figure 2. “Hurricane Katrina was the most destructive hurricane to ever strike the U.S.” NOAA Just as we were getting back on our feet from the impacts of Hurricane Katrina, BAM! We were faced with another storm, Rita.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Andrew and Insurance: the Enduring Impact of An
    HURRICANE ANDREW AND INSURANCE: THE ENDURING IMPACT OF AN HISTORIC STORM AUGUST 2012 Lynne McChristian Florida Representative, Insurance Information Institute (813) 480-6446 [email protected] Florida Office: Insurance Information Institute, 4775 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33617 INTRODUCTION Hurricane Andrew hit Florida on August 24, 1992, and the tumult for the property insurance market there has not ceased in the 20 years since. Andrew was the costliest natural disaster in U.S. history in terms of insurance payouts to people whose homes, vehicles and businesses were damaged by the storm when it struck Florida and Louisiana in 1992. The insurance claims payout totaled $15.5 billion at the time ($25 billion in 2011 dollars). Even today, the storm is the second costliest natural disaster; Hurricane Katrina, which hit in 2005, is the most costly natural disaster. But the cost is only part of Andrew’s legacy. It also revealed that Florida’s vulnerability to hurricanes had been seriously underestimated. That reality was not lost on other coastal states nor on the insurance industry, which reassessed their exposure to catastrophic storm damage in the aftermath of Andrew. The event brought a harsh awakening and forced individuals, insurers, legislators, insurance regulators and state governments to come to grips with the necessity of preparing both financially and physically for unprecedented natural disasters. Many of the insurance market changes that have occurred nationally over the last two decades can be traced to the wakeup call delivered by Hurricane Andrew. These include: . More carefully managed coastal exposure. Larger role of government in insuring coastal risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation and Prediction of Hurricane Eyewall
    INVESTIGATION AND PREDICTION OF HURRICANE EYEWALL REPLACEMENT CYCLES By Matthew Sitkowski A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2012 Date of final oral examination: 4/9/12 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: James P. Kossin, Affiliate Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Daniel J. Vimont, Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Steven A. Ackerman, Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Jonathan E. Martin, Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Gregory J. Tripoli, Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences i Abstract Flight-level aircraft data and microwave imagery are analyzed to investigate hurricane secondary eyewall formation and eyewall replacement cycles (ERCs). This work is motivated to provide forecasters with new guidance for predicting and better understanding the impacts of ERCs. A Bayesian probabilistic model that determines the likelihood of secondary eyewall formation and a subsequent ERC is developed. The model is based on environmental and geostationary satellite features. A climatology of secondary eyewall formation is developed; a 13% chance of secondary eyewall formation exists when a hurricane is located over water, and is also utilized by the model. The model has been installed at the National Hurricane Center and has skill in forecasting secondary eyewall formation out to 48 h. Aircraft reconnaissance data from 24 ERCs are examined to develop a climatology of flight-level structure and intensity changes associated with ERCs. Three phases are identified based on the behavior of the maximum intensity of the hurricane: intensification, weakening and reintensification.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejoinder of The~ Republic of Honduras
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE MARJTIME DELIMITATION BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) REJOINDER OF THE~ REPUBLIC OF HONDURAS VOLUMEI 13 AUGUST 2003 v CHAPTER 6: GEOGRAPHIC FACTORS .................................................... 107 A. Cabo Gracias a Dios: Where the Land Boundary Meets the Sea ................................................................................................. 108 B. The Coasts of the Parties that Face the Maritime Area to be Delimited ....................................................................................... 111 C. The Islands and Rocks oflmportance to This Case which Lie in Front ofthe Land Boundary Terminus ...................................... 113 D. The Non-Relevance of Shallow Geomorphological Sea-Floor Features ......................................................................................... 116 CHAPTER 7: OBSERVATIONS ON THE NICARAGUAN LINE ................... 119 A. The Technical Characteristics ofthe Nicaraguan Line .................. 119 B. The Nicaraguan Line Runs on the Wrong Side of the Honduran Islands Situated between 15° N. Latitude and 15°15' N. Latitude ......................................................................... 120 C. The Nicaraguan Line Gives No Weight to Honduran Islands North of 15°15' N. Latitude .......................................................... 121 D. The Bisector of Coastal Fronts Presented by Nicaragua Is Based upon a Flawed Assessment of Coastal Fronts and Delimitation Methods ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report SFRC-83/01 Status of the Eastern Indigo Snake in Southern Florida National Parks and Vicinity
    Report SFRC-83/01 Status of the Eastern Indigo Snake in Southern Florida National Parks and Vicinity NATIONAL b lb -a'*? m ..-.. # .* , *- ,... - . ,--.-,, , . LG LG - m,*.,*,*, Or 7°C ,"7cn,a. Q*Everglades National Park, South Florida Research Center, P.O.Box 279, Homestead, Florida 33030 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................... 1 STUDYAREA ............................ 1 METHODS .............................. 3 RESULTS .............................. 4 Figure 1. Distribution of the indigo snake in southern Florida ..... 5 Figure 2 . Distribution of the indigo snake in the Florida Keys including Biscayne National Park ............. 6 DISCUSSION ............................. 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................ 13 LITERATURE CITED ......................... 14 APPENDIX 1. Observations of indigo snakes in southern Florida ....... 17 APPENDIX 2 . Data on indigo snakes examined in and adjacent to Everglades National Park ................. 24 APPENDIX 3. Museum specimens of indigo snakes from southern Florida ... 25 4' . Status of the Eastern Indigo Snake in Southern Florida National Parks and Vicinity Report ~F~~-83/01 Todd M. Steiner, Oron L. Bass, Jr., and James A. Kushlan National Park Service South Florida Research Center Everglades National Park Homestead, Florida 33030 January 1983 Steiner, Todd M., Oron L. Bass, Jr., and James A. Kushlan. 1983. Status of the Eastern Indigo Snake in Southern Florida National Parks and Vicinity. South Florida Research Center Report SFRC- 83/01. 25 pp. INTRODUCTION The status and biology of the eastern indigo snake, Drymarchon corais couperi, the largest North American snake (~awler,1977), is poorly understood. Destruction of habitat and exploitation by the pet trade have reduced its population levels in various localities to the point that it is listed by the Federal government as a threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Irma Storm Review
    Hurricane Irma Storm Review November 11, 2018 At Duke Energy Florida, we power more than 4 million lives Service territory includes: . Service to 1.8 million retail customers in 35 counties . 13,000 square miles . More than 5,100 miles of transmission lines and 32,000 miles of distribution lines . Owns and operates nearly 9,500 MWs of generating capacity . 76.2% gas, 21% coal, 3% renewable, 0.2%oil, 2,400 MWs Purchased Power. 2 Storm Preparedness Activities Operational preparation is a year-round activity Coordination with County EOC Officials . Transmission & Distribution Systems Inspected and . Structured Engagement and Information Maintained Sharing Before, During and After Hurricane . Storm Organizations Drilled & Prepared . Coordination with county EOC priorities . Internal and External Resource Needs Secured . Public Communications and Outreach . Response Plan Tested and Continuously Improved Storm Restoration Organization Transmission Hurricane Distribution System Preparedness System Local Governmental Coordination 3 Hurricane Irma – Resources & Logistics Resources . 12,528 Total Resources . 1,553 pre-staged in Perry, Georgia . 91 line and vegetation vendors from 25 states . Duke Energy Carolinas and Midwest crews as well as resources from Texas, New York, Louisiana, Colorado, Illinois, Oklahoma, Minnesota, Maine and Canada . 26 independent basecamps, parking/staging sites Mutual Assistance . Largest mobilization in DEF history . Mutual Assistance Agreements, executed between DEF and other utilities, ensure that resources can be timely dispatched and fairly apportioned. Southeastern Electric Exchange coordinates Mutual Assistance 4 5. Individual homes RESTORATION 3. Critical Infrastructure 2. Substations 1. Transmission Lines 4. High-density neighborhoods 5 Hurricane Irma- Restoration Irma’s track northward up the Florida peninsula Restoration Summary resulted in a broad swath of hurricane and tropical Customers Peak Customers Outage storm force winds.
    [Show full text]
  • A FAILURE of INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina
    A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina U.S. House of Representatives 4 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Union Calendar No. 00 109th Congress Report 2nd Session 000-000 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Report by the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoacess.gov/congress/index.html February 15, 2006. — Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U. S. GOVERNMEN T PRINTING OFFICE Keeping America Informed I www.gpo.gov WASHINGTON 2 0 0 6 23950 PDF For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COVER PHOTO: FEMA, BACKGROUND PHOTO: NASA SELECT BIPARTISAN COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE PREPARATION FOR AND RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA TOM DAVIS, (VA) Chairman HAROLD ROGERS (KY) CHRISTOPHER SHAYS (CT) HENRY BONILLA (TX) STEVE BUYER (IN) SUE MYRICK (NC) MAC THORNBERRY (TX) KAY GRANGER (TX) CHARLES W. “CHIP” PICKERING (MS) BILL SHUSTER (PA) JEFF MILLER (FL) Members who participated at the invitation of the Select Committee CHARLIE MELANCON (LA) GENE TAYLOR (MS) WILLIAM J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Operational Challenges of Forecasting TC Intensity Change in the Presence of Dry Air and Strong Vertical Shear
    The Operational Challenges of Forecasting TC Intensity Change in the Presence of Dry Air and Strong Vertical Shear Jamie R. Rhome,* and Richard D. Knabb NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Tropical Prediction Center/National Hurricane Center, Miami, FL 1. INTRODUCTION to an incomplete specification of the initial moisture conditions, dynamical model forecasts of middle- to Tropical cyclone (TC) intensity changes involve upper-tropospheric humidity often have large errors. complex interactions between many environmental Beyond the problems with observing and forecasting factors, including vertical wind shear and the humidity, TC intensity forecasts become particularly thermodynamic properties of the ambient atmosphere challenging when dry air is accompanied by moderate to and ocean. While the effects of each factor are not strong vertical shear. completely understood, even less is known about the Much of the current understanding on the response effects of these factors working in tandem. Emanuel et of a TC to vertical shear comes from idealized studies. It al. (2004) proposed that “storm intensity in a sheared has been shown that strong vertical shear typically results environment is sensitive to the ambient humidity” and in the convective pattern of the TC becoming cautioned “against considering the various environmental increasingly asymmetric followed by a downshear tilt of influences on storm intensity as operating independently the vortex (Frank and Ritchie 2001, Bender 1997). To from each other.” Along these lines, Dunion and Velden keep the tilted TC vortex quasi-balanced, the (2004) have examined the combined effects of vertical diabatically-driven secondary circulation aligns itself to shear and dry air on TCs during interactions with the produce an asymmetry in vertical motion that favors Saharan Air Layer (SAL).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Monroe County
    2016 Supplemental Summary Statewide Regional Evacuation Study APPENDIX C - MONROE COUNTY This document contains summaries (updated in 2016) of the following chapters of the 2010 Volume 1-11 Technical Data Report: Chapter 1: Regional Demographics Chapter 2: Regional Hazards Analysis Chapter 4: Regional Vulnerability and Population Analysis Funding provided by the Florida Work completed by the Division of Emergency Management South Florida Regional Council STATEWIDE REGIONAL EVACUATION STUDY – SOUTH FLORIDA APPENDIX C – MONROE COUNTY This page intentionally left blank. STATEWIDE REGIONAL EVACUATION STUDY – SOUTH FLORIDA APPENDIX C – MONROE COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX C – MONROE COUNTY Page A. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 B. Small Area Data ............................................................................................. 1 C. Demographic Trends ...................................................................................... 4 D. Census Maps .................................................................................................. 9 E. Hazard Maps .................................................................................................15 F. Critical Facilities Vulnerability Analysis .............................................................23 List of Tables Table 1 Small Area Data ............................................................................................. 1 Table 2 Health Care Facilities Vulnerability
    [Show full text]
  • MSRP Appendix A
    APPENDIX A: RECOVERY TEAM MEMBERS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Appendix A. Names appearing in bold print denote those who authored or prepared Appointed Recovery various components of the recovery plan. Team Members Ralph Adams Geoffrey Babb Florida Atlantic University The Nature Conservancy Biological Sciences 222 South Westmonte Drive, Suite 300 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Altimonte Springs, Florida 32714-4236 Ross Alliston Alice Bard Monroe County, Environmental Florida Department of Environmental Resource Director Protection 2798 Overseas Hwy Florida Park Service, District 3 Marathon , Florida 33050 1549 State Park Drive Clermont, Florida 34711 Ken Alvarez Florida Department of Enviromental Bob Barron Protection U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Florida Park Service, 1843 South Trail Regulatory Division Osprey, Florida 34229 P.O. Box 4970 Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019 Loran Anderson Florida State University Oron L. “Sonny” Bass Department of Biological Science National Park Service Tallahassee, Florida 32306-2043 Everglades National Park 40001 State Road 9336 Tom Armentano Homestead, Florida 33034-6733 National Park Service Everglades National Park Steven Beissinger 40001 State Road 9336 Yale University - School of Homestead, Florida 33034-6733 Forestry & Environmental Studies Sage Hall, 205 Prospect Street David Arnold New Haven, Connecticut 06511 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rob Bennetts 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard P.O. Box 502 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 West Glacier, Montana 59936 Daniel F. Austin Michael Bentzien Florida Atlantic University U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Sciences Jacksonville Field Office 777 Glades Road 6620 Southpoint Drive South, Suite 310 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Jacksonville, Florida 32216-0912 David Auth Nancy Bissett University of Florida The Natives Florida Museum of Natural History 2929 J.B.
    [Show full text]