The Delimitation of Landscape Units for the Planning of Protection – the Example of the Forests by Upper Liswarta Landscape Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Delimitation of Landscape Units for the Planning of Protection – the Example of the Forests by Upper Liswarta Landscape Park Title: The delimitation of landscape units for the planning of protection – the example of the Forests by Upper Liswarta Landscape Park Author: Michał Sobala, Katarzyna Pukowiec-Kurda, Anna Żemła-Siesicka Citation style: Sobala Michał, Pukowiec-Kurda Katarzyna, Żemła-Siesicka Anna. (2019). The delimitation of landscape units for the planning of protection – the example of the Forests by Upper Liswarta Landscape Park. “Quaestiones Geographicae” (Vol. 38, iss. 1 (2019), s. 97-105), doi 10.2478/quageo-2019-0002 Michał Sobala, Katarzyna PuKowiec-Kurda, anna ŻeMła-SieSicKa QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 38(1) • 2019 THE DELIMITATION OF LANDSCAPE UNITS FOR THE PLANNING OF PROTECTION – THE EXAMPLE OF THE FORESTS BY UPPER LISWARTA LANDSCAPE PARK Michał Sobala , Katarzyna PuKowiec-Kurda , anna ŻeMła-SieSicKa Department of Regional Geography and Tourism, University of Silesia, Sosnowiec, Poland Manuscript received: September 3, 2018 Revised version: January 17, 2019 Sobala M., PuKowiec-Kurda K., ŻeMła-SieSicKa a., 2019. The delimitation of landscape units for the planning of pro- tection – the example of the Forests by Upper Liswarta Landscape Park. Quaestiones Geographicae 38(1), Bogucki Wy- dawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 97–105. 7 figs, 2 tables. abStract: The delimitation of landscape units can be helpful in the preparation of studies related to landscape protec- tion and landscaping. The aim of this article is to propose the modification of the method of local landscape delimita- tion developed for the landscape audit for the needs of protected areas. The comparison of two methods of delimitation indicates that the same area can be assigned to different landscape types and subtypes. The proposed modification of the method of landscape unit delimitation allows a more detailed reflection of the landscape and its links to the admin- istrative boundaries of administrative communities. Key wordS: landscape audit, landscape in protected area, landscape park, landscape management, landscape units Corresponding author: Michał Sobala, [email protected] Introduction and conditions by which this can be determined (Solon et al. 2015). The undertaken works are con- The implementation of landscape audits, nected with the implementation of the European based on the act of 24th April 2015 on changes in Landscape Convention (2006), the purpose of some acts connected with the reinforcement of which is i.a. promoting landscape protection, landscape protection mechanisms (Act… 2015), management and planning. Similar activities have was preceded by the development of a method- been carried out in other European countries, ology of landscape auditing (Solon et al. 2014). such as Italy (Maximova 2016), Sweden (Dovlén This methodology includes the delimitation, ty- 2016), the Czech Republic (Kolejka, Lipsky 2008) pology and valuation of current landscapes, on and Slovakia (Kozová et al. 2009). the basis of which priority landscapes can be dis- The methodology of carrying out a landscape tinguished. According to the act, a priority land- audit may also be helpful in the preparation of scape should be understood as a landscape that other studies related to landscape protection and is particularly valuable for society because of its landscaping, e.g. environmental plans for pro- natural, cultural, historical, architectural, urban, tected areas such as national parks or landscape rural or aesthetic-scenic value. For this reason, it parks (Gorzym-Wilkowski 2016). National parks is necessary to maintain or define the principles are created in areas with natural landscapes, © 2019 Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license doi: 10.2478/ quageo-2019-0002 ISSN 0137-477X, eISSN 2081-6383 98 MICHAł SObALA, KATARzyNA PUKOWIEC-KURDA, ANNA ŻEMłA-Siesicka whereas landscape parks concern mainly harmo- to improve the proposed typology. So far, such nious natural-cultural landscapes (Chmielewski tests have been carried out for four communes et al. 2015). This second form of conservation is in the Częstochowa district (Myga-Piątek et al. also created to protect the landscape. The de- 2015), Kazimierski Landscape Park (Michalik- velopment of the draft environmental plans for Śnieżek, Chmielewski 2017), Szczyrk commune a landscape park includes, i.a. an inventory of (badora, Jakubiec 2018) and the Popielów com- landscape values (Regulation … 2005). The val- mune (Solecka et al. 2018). uation of landscapes using the landscape audit Because a landscape audit is drawn up for the methodology must be carried out within land- whole province, it was assumed that the scale scape units known as local landscapes (Solon et of the study would completely different from al. 2015). These units are separated within phys- that of a landscape park. Therefore, the authors ico-geographical mesoregions (Proposal 2018). proposed a modified method of landscape unit The features of these units are: homogeneity of delimitation, taking into account the conditions the landscape background while preserving spa- resulting from the much smaller area occupied tial heterogeneity, maintaining functional links by landscape parks and the principles of prepar- between the spatial elements of the landscape ing protection plans for landscape parks. The aim and the repeatability of the spatial structure and of the work is to present the author’s method of physiognomy in different parts of the landscape local landscape delimitation, which is a modifi- (Solon et al. 2014). Local landscapes can be treat- cation of the audit method, and to compare the ed as basic landscape management units. results of the landscape unit delimitation using Recently, many authors in Poland have paid the two methods: audit and modified. more and more attention to issues related to landscape audits, both in terms of the method- ology of separating local landscapes and their Landscape parks in the nature typology. The authors of the current typology conservation system of Polish landscapes (Chmielewski et al. 2015) point to the need to test it in different physico-ge- The landscape park is one of the nature conser- ographical, cultural or socio-economic regions. vation forms defined in the Nature Conservation The conclusions of these works should be used Act (Act… 2004). It comprises an area which is Fig. 1. The location of landscape parks on the background of Poland’s land cover. THE DELIMITATION OF LANDSCAPE UNITS FOR THE PLANNING OF PROTECTION 99 protected due to its natural, historical, cultural selection of this landscape park as a study area and landscape values, in order to preserve and was determined both by its size and good recog- promote these values in harmony with sustain- nition of the area (Kurda, Pukowiec 2013, 2015). able development. The concept of creating land- A characteristic feature of the park is its high scape parks appeared in Poland in the early level of forest cover, with the predominance of 1960s (Kistowski 2004). To date, 123 landscape coniferous forests. The dominant species in the parks have been created in Poland, occupying forests of this area is Pinus sylvestris. The mod- a total area of about 26,000 km2, which is 8.3% erately moist habitats are covered by Leucobryo- of the territory of Poland. Landscape parks in Pinetum and Querco roboris-Pinetum with Quercus Poland are not large compared to their counter- robur and Quercus petraea, wetland habitats are parts elsewhere in Europe (Kistowski 2004). The covered by Calamagrostio villosae-Pinetum, and average size of a landscape park in Poland is peat bogs are covered by Vaccinio uliginosi-Pine- 216.4 km2 (Fig. 1). The largest landscape park in tum sylvestris. In moist habitats, riparian forests, Poland, Barycz Valley Landscape Park, occupies especially Carici remotae-Fraxinetum, occupy an an area of 861.2 km2, while the smallest, Stawki important place. There are also oak-hornbeam Landscape Park, is only 17.3 km2. forests and Quercetalia pubescenti-petraeae in the park. The particularly valuable areas in the park include peat bogs, partially protected as ecolog- Study area ical lands (Mastaj 2008). The conservation of na- ture is strengthened by 4 forest nature reserves: From all the landscape parks in Poland, to pres- łęg nad Młynówką, Cisy w łebkach, Cisy nad ent the author’s method of local landscape delim- Liswartą and Rajchowa Góra (RDOŚ 2017). One itation, the Forests by Upper Liswarta Landscape important element of the Liswarta valley land- Park was selected. It was established on 21st scape are its numerous fish ponds. They com- December 1998 under Regulation No. 28/98 of the prise water communes with rare plant species Częstochowa Province (Regulation … 1998). It is – Nuphar lutea, Nymphaea alba, Salvinia natans, as the 16th largest landscape park in Poland (387.4 well as rush plants (Rąkowski 2004). They create km2) and the third in the Silesian Province. It is favourable conditions for the existence of nu- located within 6 mesoregions, according to the merous, rare species of animals, especially birds. division of Kondracki (2011) modified by J. Solon Another important element of the landscape et al. (2018): Upper Mała Panew Depression, park is its cultural objects, in particular grange Upper Liswarta Depression, Krzepice Depression, and palace complexes. Liswarta Depression, Herby Rock Step, Woźniki Rock Step. Administratively, it includes the terri- tory of 3 districts and 12 communes (Figs 2, 3). The Fig. 3. Location of the Forests by Upper Liswarta Fig. 2. Location of the Forests by Upper Liswarta Landscape Park in the background of the communes Landscape Park on the background of mesoregions. of the Silesian Voivodeship. 100 MICHAł SObALA, KATARzyNA PUKOWIEC-KURDA, ANNA ŻEMłA-Siesicka Materials and methods background (Solon et al. 2014). In the case of the audit method, the units are delimitated within The delimitation of landscape units was car- mesoregions. However, the authors proposed a ried out using the two methods: audit and modi- modification of this method based on the delim- fied, on the same scale of 1:20,000. It involves the itation of units within the communities’ bound- division of the analysed area into smaller spatial aries (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Grubość Pokrywy Śnieżnej I Zapas Wody W Śniegu Na Stacjach 21.11.2020 Meteorologicznych IMGW-PIB
    INSTYTUT METEOROLOGII I GOSPODARKI WODNEJ PAŃSTWOWY INSTYTUT BADAWCZY Centralne Biuro Hydrologii Operacyjnej w Warszawie ul. Podleśna 61, 01-673 Warszawa tel.: (22) 56-94-140 fax.: (22) 83-45-097 e-mail: [email protected] www..imgw.pl www.meteo.imgw.pl www.stopsuszy.imgw.pll Grubość pokrywy śnieżnej i zapas wody w śniegu na stacjach 21.11.2020 meteorologicznych IMGW-PIB Grubość Zapas Norma Grubość świeżo Gatunek Obciążenie Lp. Nazwa stacji Rzeka Zlewnia Województwo Wysokość wody obciążenia pokrywy spadłego śniegu śniegiem w śniegu śniegiem śniegu m n.p.m. cm cm kod mm kN/m 2 kN/m 2 A B C D E F G H I J K L 1. BOGATYNIA Miedzianka (17416) Nysa Łużycka (174) dolnośląskie 295 0,665 2. BOLESŁAWÓW Morawka (12162) Nysa Kłodzka (12) dolnośląskie 600 2,800 3. BUKÓWKA Bóbr (16) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 510 2,170 4. GRYFÓW ŚLĄSKI Kwisa (166) Kwisa (166) dolnośląskie 325 0,875 5. JAKUSZYCE Kamienna (162) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 860 1,0 1 1 4,620 6. JELCZ-LASKOWICE Widawa (136) Widawa (136) dolnośląskie 135 0,700 7. JELENIA GÓRA Bóbr (16) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 342 1,0 0 1 0,994 8. KAMIENICA Kamienica (121624) Nysa Kłodzka (12) dolnośląskie 680 3,360 9. KAMIENNA GÓRA Bóbr (16) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 360 1,120 10. KARPACZ Skałka (161844) Bóbr (16) dolnośląskie 575 1,0 0 2 2,625 11. KŁODZKO Nysa Kłodzka (12) Nysa Kłodzka (12) dolnośląskie 356 1,092 12. LĄDEK-ZDRÓJ Biała Lądecka (1216) Nysa Kłodzka (12) dolnośląskie 460 1,820 13. LEGNICA Kaczawa (138) Kaczawa (138) dolnośląskie 122 0,700 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Lelov: Cultural Memory and a Jewish Town in Poland. Investigating the Identity and History of an Ultra - Orthodox Society
    Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Item Type Thesis Authors Morawska, Lucja Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 03/10/2021 19:09:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/7827 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Lucja MORAWSKA Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and International Studies University of Bradford 2012 i Lucja Morawska Lelov: cultural memory and a Jewish town in Poland. Investigating the identity and history of an ultra - orthodox society. Key words: Chasidism, Jewish History in Eastern Europe, Biederman family, Chasidic pilgrimage, Poland, Lelov Abstract. Lelov, an otherwise quiet village about fifty miles south of Cracow (Poland), is where Rebbe Dovid (David) Biederman founder of the Lelov ultra-orthodox (Chasidic) Jewish group, - is buried.
    [Show full text]
  • ZESZYTY NAUKOWE UNIWERSYTETU SZCZECIŃSKIEGO NR 791 ACTA BIOLOGICA 20 2013 Piotr CUBER 1 Contribution to the KNOWLEDGE ON
    zeszyty naukowe uniwersytetu szczecińskiego NR 791 acta BIOLOGICA 20 2013 PIotr Cuber 1 CONTRIBUTION to THE KNOWLEDGE ON panorpid SCORPIONFLIES (MECOPTERA: PANORPIDAE) IN SOUTHERN POLAND Abstract the Polish panorpid fauna (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) consists of six species. Both the composition and distribution of the different species of this family in Poland is not sufficiently known. Particularly, there is a lack of data on this group from the area of ​​Upper silesia. in order to fill this gap, panorpids were collected in 2010 and 2012 from 16 sites in the area of silesian Province. the presence of four species was recorded, the most numerous and common were Panorpa com- munis and P. vulgaris. the presence of P. germanica was recorded for the first time, furthermore the presence of P. alpina was confirmed in the upland areas. the panorpid fauna requires further study, in particular it is necessary to deter- mine the size, condition, structure and conservation status of particular popula- tions of detected species. Keywords: scorpionflies, Mecoptera, Panorpidae, distribution, silesia 1 Medical university of silesia in katowice, school of Pharmacy, Department of Parasitology, Jedności 8, 41-200 sosnowiec; university of Gdansk, Faculty of Biology, Department of inverte- brate zoology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Parasitology and General zoology, wita stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, e-mail: [email protected]. 28 Piotr Cuber Introduction there are about 500 species of scorpionflies (Mecoptera) spread across the world at present, 21 exist in europe, and 10 in Poland (tillier 2006-2012; czechowska 2007). the order consists of nine families, three of them are present in Poland: Boreidae, Bittacidae and Panorpidae, the latter being the richest in species worl- dwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Gospodarowania Wodami Na Obszarze Dorzecza Odry
    Plan gospodarowania wodami na obszarze dorzecza Odry Warszawa, 2011 Sfinansowano ze środków Narodowego Funduszu Ochrony Środowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej na zamówienie Prezesa Krajowego Zarządu Gospodarki Wodnej Spis treści: 1. Stosowane skróty i pojęcia .................................................................................................... 6 2. Planowanie w gospodarowaniu wodami zgodnie z Ramową Dyrektywą Wodną ................ 8 3. Ogólny opis cech charakterystycznych obszaru dorzecza ................................................... 10 Wody powierzchniowe ........................................................................................................ 21 Odwzorowanie położenia granic części wód powierzchniowych ................................... 21 Odwzorowanie typów części wód powierzchniowych .................................................... 21 Wyznaczenie silnie zmienionych i sztucznych części wód .............................................. 24 Określenie warunków referencyjnych dla typów części wód powierzchniowych .......... 25 Wody podziemne ................................................................................................................ 28 Odwzorowanie położenia granic części wód podziemnych ............................................ 28 4. Podsumowanie znaczących oddziaływań i wpływów działalności człowieka na stan wód powierzchniowych i podziemnych ......................................................................................... 29 Punktowe źródła zanieczyszczeń .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wykaz Nazw Wód Płynących List of Names of Flowing Waters
    WYKAZ NAZW WÓD PŁYNĄCYCH LIST OF NAMES OF FLOWING WATERS Rodzaj Współrzędne geograficzne Nazwa obiektu Końcówka nazwy obiektu wodnego w dopełniaczu wodnego Recypient szerokość długość Uwagi Name of water object Ending of hydronyms Kind of water Recipient Remarks Geographic coordinates in the genitive case object latitude longitude Abramów -owa potok Ciapków 49°24’42” 19°01’51” Aleksandrowska, -ej, -i struga Widawka 51°18’20” 19°09’56” Struga Aleksandrówka -i potok Brzoskwinka 50°04’13” 19°45’37” Ambrowski Potok -ego -u potok Jasiołka 49°30’18” 21°42’24” Andrzejówka -i potok Sanica 50°34’49” 20°45’37” Aniołowo, Potok Aniołowo, -u struga Elszka 54°05’17” 19°34’55” Antałowski Potok -ego -u potok Czarny Dunajec 49°17’44” 19°51’11” Arciechowski, Kanał -ego, -u kanał Kanał Bieliński 52°22’20” 20°04’54” Arkonka -i struga Odra (Jez. Goplany) 53°28’01” 14°29’58” obszar bezodpływowy Arłamówka -i potok Wyrwa 49°32’57” 22°40’16” Astrabiec -bca potok Panna 49°25’39” 21°42’58” Augustowski, Kanał -ego, -u kanał Strużnica (Gwda) 53°14’22” 16°55’45” Augustowski, Kanał -ego, -u kanał Netta 53°41’03” 22°54’34” odcinek kanału Augustowski, Kanał -ego, -u kanał Netta (jez. Necko) 53°51’49” 22°59’49” odcinek kanału Augustowski, Kanał -ego, -u kanał Czarna Hańcza 53°53’31” 23°24’57” odcinek kanału Awissa -y rzeka Narew 53°00’59” 22°52’33” Baba -y rzeka Sztoła 50°15’33” 19°28’33” Baba -y struga Warta 52°05’53” 17°19’19” Baba -y struga Klaskawska Struga 53°47’29” 18°00’56” Baba -y potok Czerwona 54°13’20” 15°48’46” 1 Rodzaj Współrzędne geograficzne Nazwa obiektu
    [Show full text]
  • Wyznaczenie Kluczowych Stref Dla Poprawy Retencji Wody W Polskiej
    Wyznaczenie kluczowych stref dla poprawy retencji wody w polskiej części zlewni rzeki Odry Analiza możliwości retencji wody w systemach melioracyjnych i ich potencjalna rola w łagodzeniu niskich przepływów zimowych rzeki Odry Dr Mateusz Grygoruk Mgr inż. Paweł Osuch Mgr inż. Paweł Trandziuk Stowarzyszenie Niezależnych Inicjatyw Nasza Natura Maj, 2018 1 1 Opis kluczowych obszarów dla poprawy retencji wody w polskiej części rzeki zlewni Odry. Analiza możliwości retencji wody w systemach melioracyjnych. Mateusz Grygoruk, Paweł Osuch, Paweł Trandziuk Ilustracja okładki oraz podsumowania rozdziału: Marcel Creemers Publikacja ta jest częścią projektu realizowanego wzdłuż polskiej i niemieckiej strony Odry, a tym samym opracowana, zrealizowana i częściowo fnansowana ze wspólnej sieci polskiej i niemieckiej organizacji pozarządowej zajmującej się ochroną środowiska, a także częściowo fnansowana przez Federalną Fundację Ochrony Środowiska (DBU). oraz niemiecką Liga na Rzecz Przyrody i Środowiska (DNR). Ofcjalną wersję raportu stanowi wersja angielskojęzyczna. Sugerowane cytowania: Grygoruk, M., Osuch, P., Trandziuk, P., 2018. Opis kluczowych obszarów dla poprawy retencji wody w polskiej części zlewni rzeki Odry. Analiza potencjalnej retencji wody w systemach melioracyjnych i jej potencjalna rola w łagodzeniu niskich przepływów zimowych Odry. Raport. Niemiecka Liga na rzecz Przyrody i Środowska. 93 pp. German League for Nature Conservation Marienstraße 19 – 20 10117 Berlin Germany Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt DBU (German Federal Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Andrzej Witkowski*, Jan Kotusz Stan
    ROCZNIKI NAUKOWE PZW (Rocz. Nauk. PZW) Scientific Annual of the Polish Angling Association 2008, t. 21, s. 23–60 ANDRZEJ WITKOWSKI*, JAN KOTUSZ STAN ICHTIOFAUNISTYCZNYCH BADAŃ INWENTARYZACYJNYCH RZEK POLSKI STATE OF FISH FAUNA INVENTORY RESEARCH IN POLISH RIVERS Muzeum Przyrodnicze Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego ul. Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław ABSTRACT For many post World War II years the knowledge of fish fauna in Polish rivers was minimal. Till the 60s of the last century we possessed scarce data on only several larger rivers (the upper basins of the Vistula, the Drwęca, the Warta). They might have been useful to only a low degree in conducting effective fishery-angling management and active protection of the most threatened fish species and fish assemblages. In the period of the recent 20 years an imposing number of ichthyofaunistic investigations, which were reflected in ca. 280 publications, were carried out. Owing to this practically no blank spots on the ichthyological map of Poland occur at present. Such great achievements locate Poland among the leaders of European countries with the best investigated riverine fish fauna. Key words: Poland, rivers, fishes, inventory research, monitoring. * Autor do korespondencji: [email protected] 24 Andrzej Witkowski, Jan Kotusz 1. WSTĘP Przez wiele powojennych lat stan poznania rybostanów naszych rzek był znikomy. W 1988 roku Profesor T. Penczak napisał: „Dotychczasowe ichtiologiczne badania inwentaryzacyjne wykonane po II wojnie światowej nierównomiernie pokrywają obszar kraju. Brak jest dotąd danych o ichtio- faunie górnej i środkowej części dorzecza Odry oraz rzek wpadających bezpośrednio do Bałtyku z terenów Pojezierza Pomorskiego...”. ”Zdecydo- wanie najsłabiej poznany jest rybostan rzek „prawej części kraju”, tj.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Transformation of the Etymological Dictionary of Geographical Names
    applied sciences Article Digital Transformation of the Etymological Dictionary of Geographical Names Tomasz Kubik Faculty of Electronics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeze˙ Wyspia´nskiego27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] Abstract: This article aims to contribute to the methodology of the structuring of etymological dictionaries of geographical names and the popularization of knowledge regarding the origin of Silesian toponyms. It is based on experiences gathered during the digitization and publication in an electronic form of the SENGS´ (“Etymological Dictionary of Geographical Names of Silesia”) and addresses the problems encountered. The article discusses the rules applied in the compilation of the SENGS´ and presents two information models used during the digitalization of this dictionary: a relational model and a graph model. The first one corresponds to standard approaches when designing electronic versions of dictionaries. The second allows the creation of solutions conforming to the idea of Linked Open Data, which are deployable as parts of the Semantic Internet. An important aspect also considered was the linking of historical materials listed in the dictionary entries with the corresponding records maintained in digital repositories. This association was realized using the AZON platform (“Atlas of Open Scientific Resources”). Keywords: etymological dictionary digitization; information model; geographical names; topono- mastics 1. Introduction Citation: Tomasz, K. Digital One of the major challenges accompanying the development of human civilization Transformation of the Etymological is knowledge management. Dictionaries, as collections of words of a language compiled Dictionary of Geographical Names. together with informative descriptions, play an important role in this. Dictionaries can be Appl.
    [Show full text]
  • Mill Pond Sediments As the Indicator of the Environment of the Drainage Area (An Example of Liswarta River, Odra Basin, Poland)
    Title: Mill pond sediments as the indicator of the environment of the drainage area (an example of Liswarta River, Odra basin, Poland) Author: Maria Fajer, Martyna Anna Rzętała Citation style: Fajer Maria, Rzętała Martyna Anna. (2018). Mill pond sediments as the indicator of the environment of the drainage area (an example of Liswarta River, Odra basin, Poland). “Environmental Science and Pollution Research” (Vol. 25 (2018), s. 5832- 5847), doi 10.1007/s11356-017-0909-y Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2018) 25:5832–5847 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0909-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Mill pond sediments as the indicator of the environment of the drainage area (an example of Liswarta River, Odra basin, Poland) Maria Fajer1 & MartynaAnnaRzetala1 Received: 8 April 2017 /Accepted: 1 December 2017 /Published online: 12 December 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract The geochemical characteristics of sediments deposited within a channel-type reservoir situated behind the weir of a water mill on the River Liswarta (southern Poland) were studied in relation to land use in the catchment. The catchment in question is an agricultural one with large forest areas. The contamination of sediments with trace elements was assessed using the geoaccumulation index. The sediments studied were moderately to heavily contaminated with As, Cu, Co, Ni and Ba. They were also heavily contaminated with Sr. Additionally, V and Cr contamination ranged from heavy to extreme. The basic composition of sediments and the trace elements present in them indicate both natural and anthropogenic sources of pollution. Mill impoundments provide zones where the sediments transported by rivers accumulate.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Silesia Vol
    Cuius regio? Ideological and Territorial Cohesion of Silesia vol. 5 eds Lucyna Harc, Przemysław Wiszewski, Rościsław Żerelik Online access: http://www.bibliotekacyfrowa.pl/publication/78119 Joanna Nowosielska-Sobel, Grzegorz Strauchold, Przemysław Wiszewski Permanent Change. The New Region(s) of Silesia (1945-2015) ed. Przemysław Wiszewski Wrocław 2015 The book was published with funds of the program Cuius regio. Analiza sił spajających i destrukcyjnych w obrębie regionu określających przynależność osób (grup społecznych) oraz spójność społeczną jako zjawisko historyczne / Cuius regio. An analysis of the cohesive and disruptive forces destining the attachment of (groups of) persons to and the cohesion within regions as a historical phenomenon, decision of the Polish Minister of Science and Higher Education No. 832/N-ESF-CORECODE/2010/0. Peer review: Małgorzata Ruchniewicz Translated by: Matthew La Fontaine, Paweł Ausir Dembowski, Anna Lidia Błaszczyk, Piotr Szutt Language proofreading: Matthew La Fontaine, Judson Hamilton © Copyright by Authors and Uniwersytet Wrocławski Cover design: Marcin Fajfruk Typesetting: Aleksandra Kumaszka, Tomasz Kalota ISBN 978-83-942651-2-0 Publishing House eBooki.com.pl ul. Obornicka 37/2 51-113 Wrocław tel.: +48 602 606 508 email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.ebooki.com.pl Table of Contents Przemysław Wiszewski A time of transformation. New Silesia under construction (1945-2015) ............ 9 Joanna Nowosielska-Sobel Administrative changes....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation of Key Zones for Water Retention Enhancement in the Polish Part of the Oder Catchment
    Delineation of key zones for water retention enhancement in the Polish part of the Oder catchment Analysis of potential water retention in land reclamation systems and its possible role in mitigating winter low flows of Oder Dr Mateusz Grygoruk Mgr inż. Paweł Osuch Mgr inż. Paweł Trandziuk Stowarzyszenie Niezależnych Inicjatyw Nasza Natura May, 2018 1 2 Delineation of key zones for water retention enhancement in the Polish part of the Oder catchment. Analysis of potential water retention capacities of land reclamation systems Mateusz Grygoruk, Paweł Osuch, Paweł Trandziuk Cover photo and summary chapter photo: Marcel Creemers This publication is part of a project conducted along the Polish and German side of Oder River and therefore developed, carried out and partially financed by a joint network of joint Polish and German environmental NGO and also partially financed by the German Federal Environmental Foundation (DBU) and the German League for Nature and Environment (DNR). Suggested citation: Grygoruk, M., Osuch, P., Trandziuk, P., 2018. Delineation of key zones for water retention enhancement in the Polish part of the Oder catchment. Analysis of potential water retention in land reclamation systems and its possible role in mitigating winter low flows of Oder. Report. German League for Nature and Environment. 109 pp. German League for Nature Conservation Marienstraße 19 – 20 10117 Berlin Germany Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt DBU (German Federal Environmental Foundation) An der Bornau 2 D-49090 Osnabrück Stowarzyszenie Niezależnych
    [Show full text]
  • Załącznik Realizacja Programu Badań
    Załącznik Realizacja programu badań - zlewnia Odry L.p. Nazwa punktu Km Laboratorium WIOŚ w Bielsku-Białej 1. Odra w Chałupkach 20,0 2. Olza na moście Wisła – Istebna 78,5 3. Olza granica państwa 38,8 4. Olza poniżej jazu w Cieszynie 37,9 5. Puńcówka ujście do Olzy 0,1/37,6 6. Olza powyżej ujścia Bobrówki 36,0 7. Bobrówka ujście do Olzy 0,3/34,4 8. Olza poniżej Cieszyna 31,6 9. Olza poniżej Kaczyc i Otrębowa 23,9 10. Olza powyżej ujścia Piotrówki 16,8 11. Olza ujście do Odry 0,5/27,7 12. Piotrówka w Zebrzydowicach 19,2 13. Pielgrzymówka ujście do Piotrówki 0,2/16,1 14. Piotrówka ujście do Olzy 3,7/12,8 15. Szotkówka powyżej ujścia Ruptawki 7,1 16. Ruptawka ujście do Szotkówki 0,2/7,5 17. Szotkówka pow. Ujścia Leśnicy 1,3 18. Leśnica ujście do Szotkówki 0,3/0,6 19. Szotkówka ujście do Olzy 0,1/10,8 20. Odra w Krzyżanowicach 34,5 21. Odra powyżej Raciborza 48,5 22. Odra w Miedonii 55,5 Ośrodek Badań i Kontroli Środowiska P.P. w Katowicach 1. Psina powyżej ujścia Troi 14,2 2. Psina m.Bieńkowice 4,2/41,3 3. Ruda poniżej Żor 42,6 4. Ruda powyżej Zbiornika Rybnik 28,4 5. Nacyna ujście do Rudy 0,5/21,7 6. Ruda poniżej Zbiornika Rybnik 21,5 7. Sumina w m. Sumina 15,4 8. Sumina poniżej Nędzy 4,1 9. Ruda ujście do Odry 0,1/66,0 10. Bierawka poniżej Orzesza 49,6 11.
    [Show full text]