Timeline of Epigenetic Changes Induced by Ethanol (Etoh) in Hepg2 and HL60

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Timeline of Epigenetic Changes Induced by Ethanol (Etoh) in Hepg2 and HL60 Timeline of Epigenetic Changes Induced by Ethanol (EtOH) in HepG2 and HL60 Sophia Sayeed Qureshi This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biological Science University of Bergen November 2019 1 Acknowledgements This project is a collaboration between the Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bergen and Dr. Einar Martens Research Group for Biological Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen. I would like to express my gratitude to various people that have, for better and for worse, been journeying with me in this thesis. First, I would like thank my supervisors; Professor Stephanie Le Hellard for letting me a part of the group and for her positive attitude, Anne-Kristin Stavrum for her never-ending patience and Anja Torsvik for her amazing knowledge in cell culture (and helping my cells to live) An honourable mention to Andrea, Carla and Jonelle, for helping me and occasionally making me laugh. Working with all of you has indeed been an immensely educational experience! To all family and friends, who in one way or another shared their support, either morally, academically or technically, thank you. Lastly, I would like to thank myself for rising from numerous mental breakdowns & crying sessions throughout my academic career, and for writing this thesis! Sophia, you did good! Sophia Sayeed Qureshi, 2019 - Bergen 2 Table of contents Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................................2 1. Abstract .....................................................................................................................................5 2. Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................6 3. List of Figures............................................................................................................................8 4. List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... 10 5. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 11 5.1 What is DNA? ........................................................................................................................ 11 5.2 DNAs association within the cell ........................................................................................... 12 5.3 Gene function ........................................................................................................................ 13 5.4 Transcription of DNA into mature mRNA ........................................................................... 15 5.5 Translation of mature mRNA into protein ........................................................................... 16 5.6 Epigenetics ............................................................................................................................. 17 5.6.1 DNA Methylation............................................................................................................ 18 5.6.2 Active DNA demethylation ............................................................................................. 19 5.6.3 Passive DNA demethylation ........................................................................................... 20 5.6.4 Histone variants .............................................................................................................. 21 5.7 Environmental epigenetics .................................................................................................... 22 5.7.1 Epigenetics after exposure of environmental chemicals and toxins .............................. 22 5.7.2 Nutritional epigenetics .................................................................................................... 23 5.7.3 Behavioural epigenetics .................................................................................................. 24 5.8 Profile of DNA methylation with microarray technology .................................................... 25 6. Aim of the thesis ...................................................................................................................... 27 7. Materials .................................................................................................................................. 28 7.1 Genes ..................................................................................................................................... 29 8. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 30 8.1 Cell culture ............................................................................................................................ 30 8.1.1 – Cultivation of cells ....................................................................................................... 30 8.1.2 – Passage of cells ............................................................................................................. 30 8.1.3 – Cell counting ................................................................................................................ 30 8.1.4 – Thawing frozen cells .................................................................................................... 31 8.1.5 – Cryopreserving cells .................................................................................................... 31 8.1.6 – Mycoplasma testing ..................................................................................................... 31 8.2 Ethanol evaporation test and viability assays ................................................................. 33 8.2.1 – Measurement of ethanol evaporation .......................................................................... 33 3 8.2.2 – MTT assay ................................................................................................................... 33 8.2.3 – Trypan blue staining assay .......................................................................................... 34 8.3 Design of experiment and treatment ..................................................................................... 35 8.4 Purification and extraction of total RNA and genomic DNA ............................................... 37 8.5 Up-concentration of DNA ..................................................................................................... 38 8.6 Agarose gel electrophoresis ................................................................................................... 38 8.7 Methylation typing ................................................................................................................ 38 8.7.1 Principal component analysis (PCA) ............................................................................. 39 8.7.2 Factor analysis ................................................................................................................ 39 8.7.3 Spline analysis ................................................................................................................. 40 8.7.4 Profile searches ............................................................................................................... 40 8.7.5 Linear models for microarray ........................................................................................ 41 9. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 42 9.1 Determination of design & experimental parameters .......................................................... 42 9.1.1 Evaporation of ethanol (EtOH) ...................................................................................... 42 9.1.2 Cell viability and proliferation ....................................................................................... 43 9.2 Processing of data and performance of methylation analysis .............................................. 45 9.2.1 Principal component analysis (PCA) ............................................................................. 45 9.2.2 Quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot .......................................................................................... 49 9.2.3 Spline analysis ................................................................................................................. 49 9.2.4 Factor analysis with linear models for microarray (limma).......................................... 51 9.2.5 Profile searches ............................................................................................................... 53 10. Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 63 10.1 Main findings ................................................................................................................... 63 10.2 Discussion of performed analyses ................................................................................ 65 10.3 Methodological considerations ........................................................................................ 66 11. Conclusion ..........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • HPSE2 Gene Heparanase 2 (Inactive)
    HPSE2 gene heparanase 2 (inactive) Normal Function The HPSE2 gene provides instructions for making a protein called heparanase 2. Little is known about this protein, but its structure is similar to that of another protein called heparanase 1. Heparanase 1 is an enzyme that splits (cleaves) molecules called heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) by removing the heparan sulfate portion (the side chain). HSPGs are important parts of the lattice of proteins and other molecules outside the cell (extracellular matrix) and of basement membranes, which are thin, sheet-like structures that separate and support cells in many tissues. Cleavage of HSPGs by heparanase 1 may lead to changes in the basement membrane or extracellular matrix that allow cell movement or release of substances from the cell. The specific function of the heparanase 2 enzyme is not well understood, but studies suggest that it may block the action of heparanase 1. Health Conditions Related to Genetic Changes Migraine MedlinePlus Genetics provides information about Migraine Ochoa syndrome At least nine HPSE2 gene mutations have been identified in people with Ochoa syndrome (also called urofacial syndrome), a disorder that causes urinary problems and unusual facial expressions. These mutations result in changes in the heparanase 2 protein that likely prevent it from functioning. The connection between HPSE2 gene mutations and the features of Ochoa syndrome are unclear. Because the areas of the brain that control facial expression and urination are in close proximity, some researchers have suggested that the genetic changes may lead to an abnormality in this brain region that may account for the symptoms of Ochoa syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Urinary Tract Effects of HPSE2 Mutations
    BRIEF COMMUNICATION www.jasn.org Urinary Tract Effects of HPSE2 Mutations † Helen M. Stuart,* Neil A. Roberts,* Emma N. Hilton,* Edward A. McKenzie, Sarah B. Daly,* † ‡ Kristen D. Hadfield,* Jeffery S. Rahal,* Natalie J. Gardiner, Simon W. Tanley, | Malcolm A. Lewis,* Emily Sites,§ Brad Angle,§ Cláudia Alves, Teresa Lourenço,¶ Márcia Rodrigues,¶ Angelina Calado,** Marta Amado,** Nancy Guerreiro,** Inês Serras,** †† †† || Christian Beetz , Rita-Eva Varga , Mesrur Selcuk Silay,§§ John M. Darlow, ¶¶ || || ††† Mark G. Dobson , ¶¶ David E. Barton , *** Manuela Hunziker,¶¶ Prem Puri,¶¶*** ‡‡‡ Sally A. Feather, Judith A. Goodship ,§§§ Timothy H.J. Goodship ,§§§ Heather J. ||| BRIEF COMMUNICATION Lambert ,§§§ Heather J. Cordell ,§§§ the UK VUR Study Group, Anand Saggar, †††† Maria Kinali ,¶¶¶, the 4C Study Group, Christian Lorenz ,**** Kristina Moeller, |||| Franz Schaefer,§§§§ Aysun K. Bayazit , Stefanie Weber,¶¶¶¶ William G. Newman ,* and Adrian S. Woolf * Due to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are listed at the end of this article. ABSTRACT Urofacial syndrome (UFS) is an autosomal recessive congenital disease featuring grimacing grimacing and dysmorphic bladders. and incomplete bladder emptying. Mutations of HPSE2, encoding heparanase 2, a Considering these and previously pub- heparanase 1 inhibitor, occur in UFS, but knowledge about the HPSE2 mutation spec- lished mutations4–7 (Figure 1A), it is clear trum is limited. Here, seven UFS kindreds with HPSE2 mutations are presented, that pathogenic HPSE2 mutations are including one with deleted asparagine 254, suggesting a role for this amino acid, found across the gene’s coding region. which is conserved in vertebrate orthologs. HPSE2 mutations were absent in 23 non- Most (i.e., nonsense or frameshift muta- neurogenic neurogenic bladder probands and, of 439 families with nonsyndromic tions) would cause loss of function, but a vesicoureteric reflux, only one carried a putative pathogenic HPSE2 variant.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer Mai Mohamed University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School July 2017 Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer Mai Mohamed University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Pathology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Mohamed, Mai, "Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6907 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Role of Amylase in Ovarian Cancer by Mai Mohamed A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Pathology and Cell Biology Morsani College of Medicine University of South Florida Major Professor: Patricia Kruk, Ph.D. Paula C. Bickford, Ph.D. Meera Nanjundan, Ph.D. Marzenna Wiranowska, Ph.D. Lauri Wright, Ph.D. Date of Approval: June 29, 2017 Keywords: ovarian cancer, amylase, computational analyses, glycocalyx, cellular invasion Copyright © 2017, Mai Mohamed Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Ahmed and Fatma, who have always stressed the importance of education, and, throughout my education, have been my strongest source of encouragement and support. They always believed in me and I am eternally grateful to them. I would also like to thank my brothers, Mohamed and Hussien, and my sister, Mariam. I would also like to thank my husband, Ahmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts from the 51St European Society of Human Genetics Conference: Electronic Posters
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2019) 27:870–1041 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0408-3 MEETING ABSTRACTS Abstracts from the 51st European Society of Human Genetics Conference: Electronic Posters © European Society of Human Genetics 2019 June 16–19, 2018, Fiera Milano Congressi, Milan Italy Sponsorship: Publication of this supplement was sponsored by the European Society of Human Genetics. All content was reviewed and approved by the ESHG Scientific Programme Committee, which held full responsibility for the abstract selections. Disclosure Information: In order to help readers form their own judgments of potential bias in published abstracts, authors are asked to declare any competing financial interests. Contributions of up to EUR 10 000.- (Ten thousand Euros, or equivalent value in kind) per year per company are considered "Modest". Contributions above EUR 10 000.- per year are considered "Significant". 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: E-P01 Reproductive Genetics/Prenatal Genetics then compared this data to de novo cases where research based PO studies were completed (N=57) in NY. E-P01.01 Results: MFSIQ (66.4) for familial deletions was Parent of origin in familial 22q11.2 deletions impacts full statistically lower (p = .01) than for de novo deletions scale intelligence quotient scores (N=399, MFSIQ=76.2). MFSIQ for children with mater- nally inherited deletions (63.7) was statistically lower D. E. McGinn1,2, M. Unolt3,4, T. B. Crowley1, B. S. Emanuel1,5, (p = .03) than for paternally inherited deletions (72.0). As E. H. Zackai1,5, E. Moss1, B. Morrow6, B. Nowakowska7,J. compared with the NY cohort where the MFSIQ for Vermeesch8, A.
    [Show full text]
  • ( 12 ) United States Patent
    US010428349B2 (12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No. : US 10 , 428 ,349 B2 DeRosa et al . (45 ) Date of Patent: Oct . 1 , 2019 ( 54 ) MULTIMERIC CODING NUCLEIC ACID C12N 2830 / 50 ; C12N 9 / 1018 ; A61K AND USES THEREOF 38 / 1816 ; A61K 38 /45 ; A61K 38/ 44 ; ( 71 ) Applicant: Translate Bio , Inc ., Lexington , MA A61K 38 / 177 ; A61K 48 /005 (US ) See application file for complete search history . (72 ) Inventors : Frank DeRosa , Lexington , MA (US ) ; Michael Heartlein , Lexington , MA (56 ) References Cited (US ) ; Daniel Crawford , Lexington , U . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS MA (US ) ; Shrirang Karve , Lexington , 5 , 705 , 385 A 1 / 1998 Bally et al. MA (US ) 5 ,976 , 567 A 11/ 1999 Wheeler ( 73 ) Assignee : Translate Bio , Inc ., Lexington , MA 5 , 981, 501 A 11/ 1999 Wheeler et al. 6 ,489 ,464 B1 12 /2002 Agrawal et al. (US ) 6 ,534 ,484 B13 / 2003 Wheeler et al. ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer , the term of this 6 , 815 ,432 B2 11/ 2004 Wheeler et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 7 , 422 , 902 B1 9 /2008 Wheeler et al . 7 , 745 ,651 B2 6 / 2010 Heyes et al . U . S . C . 154 ( b ) by 0 days. 7 , 799 , 565 B2 9 / 2010 MacLachlan et al. (21 ) Appl. No. : 16 / 280, 772 7 , 803 , 397 B2 9 / 2010 Heyes et al . 7 , 901, 708 B2 3 / 2011 MacLachlan et al. ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 20 , 2019 8 , 101 ,741 B2 1 / 2012 MacLachlan et al . 8 , 188 , 263 B2 5 /2012 MacLachlan et al . (65 ) Prior Publication Data 8 , 236 , 943 B2 8 /2012 Lee et al .
    [Show full text]
  • CENTOGENE's Severe and Early Onset Disorder Gene List
    CENTOGENE’s severe and early onset disorder gene list USED IN PRENATAL WES ANALYSIS AND IDENTIFICATION OF “PATHOGENIC” AND “LIKELY PATHOGENIC” CENTOMD® VARIANTS IN NGS PRODUCTS The following gene list shows all genes assessed in prenatal WES tests or analysed for P/LP CentoMD® variants in NGS products after April 1st, 2020. For searching a single gene coverage, just use the search on www.centoportal.com AAAS, AARS1, AARS2, ABAT, ABCA12, ABCA3, ABCB11, ABCB4, ABCB7, ABCC6, ABCC8, ABCC9, ABCD1, ABCD4, ABHD12, ABHD5, ACACA, ACAD9, ACADM, ACADS, ACADVL, ACAN, ACAT1, ACE, ACO2, ACOX1, ACP5, ACSL4, ACTA1, ACTA2, ACTB, ACTG1, ACTL6B, ACTN2, ACVR2B, ACVRL1, ACY1, ADA, ADAM17, ADAMTS2, ADAMTSL2, ADAR, ADARB1, ADAT3, ADCY5, ADGRG1, ADGRG6, ADGRV1, ADK, ADNP, ADPRHL2, ADSL, AFF2, AFG3L2, AGA, AGK, AGL, AGPAT2, AGPS, AGRN, AGT, AGTPBP1, AGTR1, AGXT, AHCY, AHDC1, AHI1, AIFM1, AIMP1, AIPL1, AIRE, AK2, AKR1D1, AKT1, AKT2, AKT3, ALAD, ALDH18A1, ALDH1A3, ALDH3A2, ALDH4A1, ALDH5A1, ALDH6A1, ALDH7A1, ALDOA, ALDOB, ALG1, ALG11, ALG12, ALG13, ALG14, ALG2, ALG3, ALG6, ALG8, ALG9, ALMS1, ALOX12B, ALPL, ALS2, ALX3, ALX4, AMACR, AMER1, AMN, AMPD1, AMPD2, AMT, ANK2, ANK3, ANKH, ANKRD11, ANKS6, ANO10, ANO5, ANOS1, ANTXR1, ANTXR2, AP1B1, AP1S1, AP1S2, AP3B1, AP3B2, AP4B1, AP4E1, AP4M1, AP4S1, APC2, APTX, AR, ARCN1, ARFGEF2, ARG1, ARHGAP31, ARHGDIA, ARHGEF9, ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, ARL13B, ARL3, ARL6, ARL6IP1, ARMC4, ARMC9, ARSA, ARSB, ARSL, ARV1, ARX, ASAH1, ASCC1, ASH1L, ASL, ASNS, ASPA, ASPH, ASPM, ASS1, ASXL1, ASXL2, ASXL3, ATAD3A, ATCAY, ATIC, ATL1, ATM, ATOH7,
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/048577 A2 April 2015 (02.04.2015) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/048577 A2 April 2015 (02.04.2015) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 48/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (21) International Application Number: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, PCT/US20 14/057905 DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, 26 September 2014 (26.09.2014) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (25) Filing Language: English PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (26) Publication Language: English SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 61/883,925 27 September 2013 (27.09.2013) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/898,043 31 October 2013 (3 1. 10.2013) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (71) Applicant: EDITAS MEDICINE, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Namyoung Jung
    EPIGENETIC BASIS OF STEM CELL IDENTITY IN NORMAL AND MALIGNANT HEMATOPOIETIC DEVELOPMENT by Namyoung Jung A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland July, 2015 © 2015 Namyoung Jung All Rights Reserved Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy characterized by subpopulations of leukemia-initiating or leukemia stem cells (LSC) that give rise to clonally related non-stem leukemic blasts. The LSC model proposes that since LSC and their blast progeny are clonally related, their functional properties must be due to epigenetic differences. In addition, the cell of origin of LSC among normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) has yet to be clearly demonstrated. In order to investigate the role of epigenetics in LSC function and hematopoietic development, we profiled DNA methylation and gene expression of CD34+CD38-, CD34+CD38+ and CD34- cells from 15 AML patients, along with 6 well-defined HSPC populations from 5 normal bone marrows using Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip and Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. To define LSC and blast functionally, we performed engraftment assays on the three subpopulations from 15 AML patients and defined 20 LSCs and 24 blast samples. We identified the key functional LSC epigenetic signature able to distinguish LSC from blasts that consisted of 84 differential methylations regions (DMRs) in 70 genes that correlated with differential gene expression. HOXA cluster genes were enriched within the LSC epigenetic signature. We found that most of these DMRs involve epigenetic alteration independent of underlying mutations, although several are downstream targets of genetic mutation in epigenome modifying enzymes and upstream regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Network-Based Analysis Methods with Application to the Genetic Component of Asthma Yuanlong Liu
    Development of network-based analysis methods with application to the genetic component of asthma Yuanlong Liu To cite this version: Yuanlong Liu. Development of network-based analysis methods with application to the genetic com- ponent of asthma. Human genetics. Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2017. English. NNT : 2017US- PCC329. tel-02466418 HAL Id: tel-02466418 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02466418 Submitted on 4 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Thèse de doctorat de l’Université Sorbonne Paris Cité Préparé à l’Université Paris Diderot ÉCOLE DOCTORALE PIERRE LOUIS DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE À PARIS ÉPIDÉMIOLOGIE ET SCIENCES DE L’INFORMATION BIOMÉDICALE (ED 393) Unité de recherche: UMR 946 - Variabilité Génétique et Maladies Humaines DOCTORAT Spécialité: Epidémiologie Génétique Yuanlong LIU Development of network-based analysis methods with application to the genetic component of asthma Thèse dirigée par Florence DEMENAIS Présentée et soutenue publiquement à Paris le 13 Novembre 2017 JURY M. Bertram MÜLLER-MYHSOK Professeur, Technische Universität München Rapporteur Mme Kristel VAN STEEN Professeur, Université de Liège Rapporteur M. Benno SCHWIKOWSKI Directeur de Recherche, Institut Pasteur Examinateur M. Mohamed NADIF Professeur, Université Paris-Descartes Examinateur M.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Cancer Subtypes and Glioma Stem Cell Characterisation Unifying Tumour Transcriptomic Features with Cell Line Expression and Chromatin Accessibility
    An evaluation of cancer subtypes and glioma stem cell characterisation Unifying tumour transcriptomic features with cell line expression and chromatin accessibility Ewan Roderick Johnstone EMBL-EBI, Darwin College University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Darwin College December 2016 Dedicated to Klaudyna. Declaration • I hereby declare that except where specific reference is made to the work of others, the contents of this dissertation are original and have not been submitted in whole or in part for consideration for any other degree or qualification in this, or any other university. • This dissertation is my own work and contains nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration with others, except as specified in the text and Acknowledge- ments. • This dissertation is typeset in LATEX using one-and-a-half spacing, contains fewer than 60,000 words including appendices, footnotes, tables and equations and has fewer than 150 figures. Ewan Roderick Johnstone December 2016 Acknowledgements This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, Ref:1112564) and supported by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) and its outstation, the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI). I have many people to thank for assistance in preparing this thesis. First and foremost I must thank my supervisor, Paul Bertone for his support and willingness to take me on as a student. My thanks are also extended to present and past members of the Bertone group, particularly Pär Engström and Remco Loos who have provided a great deal of guidance over the course of my studentship.
    [Show full text]
  • Urinary Tract Effects of HPSE2 Mutations
    BRIEF COMMUNICATION www.jasn.org Urinary Tract Effects of HPSE2 Mutations † Helen M. Stuart,* Neil A. Roberts,* Emma N. Hilton,* Edward A. McKenzie, Sarah B. Daly,* † ‡ Kristen D. Hadfield,* Jeffery S. Rahal,* Natalie J. Gardiner, Simon W. Tanley, | Malcolm A. Lewis,* Emily Sites,§ Brad Angle,§ Cláudia Alves, Teresa Lourenço,¶ Márcia Rodrigues,¶ Angelina Calado,** Marta Amado,** Nancy Guerreiro,** Inês Serras,** †† †† || Christian Beetz , Rita-Eva Varga , Mesrur Selcuk Silay,§§ John M. Darlow, ¶¶ || || ††† Mark G. Dobson , ¶¶ David E. Barton , *** Manuela Hunziker,¶¶ Prem Puri,¶¶*** ‡‡‡ Sally A. Feather, Judith A. Goodship ,§§§ Timothy H.J. Goodship ,§§§ Heather J. ||| Lambert ,§§§ Heather J. Cordell ,§§§ the UK VUR Study Group, Anand Saggar, †††† Maria Kinali ,¶¶¶, the 4C Study Group, Christian Lorenz ,**** Kristina Moeller, |||| Franz Schaefer,§§§§ Aysun K. Bayazit , Stefanie Weber,¶¶¶¶ William G. Newman ,* and Adrian S. Woolf * Due to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are listed at the end of this article. ABSTRACT Urofacial syndrome (UFS) is an autosomal recessive congenital disease featuring grimacing grimacing and dysmorphic bladders. and incomplete bladder emptying. Mutations of HPSE2, encoding heparanase 2, a Considering these and previously pub- heparanase 1 inhibitor, occur in UFS, but knowledge about the HPSE2 mutation spec- lished mutations4–7 (Figure 1A), it is clear trum is limited. Here, seven UFS kindreds with HPSE2 mutations are presented, that pathogenic HPSE2 mutations are including one with deleted asparagine 254, suggesting a role for this amino acid, found across the gene’s coding region. which is conserved in vertebrate orthologs. HPSE2 mutations were absent in 23 non- Most (i.e., nonsense or frameshift muta- neurogenic neurogenic bladder probands and, of 439 families with nonsyndromic tions) would cause loss of function, but a vesicoureteric reflux, only one carried a putative pathogenic HPSE2 variant.
    [Show full text]