The Eastern Mediterranean

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Eastern Mediterranean 510-515-Chapter22 10/16/02 11:28 AM Page 510 Main Ideas The Eastern • The holy places of three religions are found in this Mediterranean subregion. • There is a great deal of political tension among nations in this subregion. Places & Terms Western Wall A HUMAN PERSPECTIVE On September 28, 2000, riots broke out in Dome of the Rock the city of Jerusalem. The cause was a visit by an Israeli political leader Zionism to a Jewish holy place at a location on the Temple Mount. Muslims also Palestine Liberation have a holy place on the Temple Mount. They viewed the visit by the Organization (PLO) Israeli leader as disrespectful to Muslims. Hundreds of people died in the civil unrest that followed. Connect to the Issues religious conflict To understand why a simple visit to a holy place would cause such problems, it is necessary to understand the deep-seated hostility Arabs Creation of the nation of Israel led to conflict in the region. and Jews feel for each other. They have an enormous disagreement over the control of the city of Jerusalem and of the land called the Occupied Territories. (See the map on page 480.) In fact, the relations between Arabs and Jews affect the entire region of the Eastern Mediterranean. PLACE Christian pilgrims walk Religious Holy Places on the road to the Mount of Olives Three major monotheistic religions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam— on a holy day—Palm Sunday. were founded in Southwest Asia. All three claim Jerusalem as a holy city. The City of Jerusalem, which covers 42 square miles, has Jewish, Christian, Armenian Christian, and Muslim sec- tions. Followers of all three religions come to the Old City to visit locations with strong spiritual meaning. JEWISH PRESENCE For Jews, Jerusalem, the capital of Israel, is the center of their modern and ancient home- land. Located in the old part of the city, the Temple Mount once housed the religion’s earliest temples. There, King Solomon built the First Temple. The Second Temple was constructed after the Jews returned to their homeland in 538 B.C. Modern Jews come to pray at the holiest site in Jerusalem, a portion of the Second Temple known as the Western Wall—also called the Wailing Wall. It is the only remaining piece of the Second Temple, which was destroyed in A.D. 70 by the Romans. CHRISTIAN HERITAGE For Christians, Jerusalem is the sacred location of the final suffering and crucifixion of Jesus. Towns and villages important in the life of Jesus are found near Jerusalem. Every year, Christians visit places like the Mount of Olives and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre by the thousands. When Jerusalem was under Muslim control, Christians launched the Crusades to regain the lands and place them under the 510 CHAPTER 22 510-515-Chapter22 10/16/02 11:28 AM Page 511 control of Christians. Eventually, the lands returned to the control of Muslims and remained that way until the nation of Israel was established in May of 1948. ISLAMIC SACRED SITES After Mecca and Medina, Jerusalem is considered the third most holy city to Muslims. A shrine there, called Dome of the Rock, houses the spot where Muslims believe the Prophet Muhammad rose into heaven. Jews believe it is the site where Abraham, a Jewish fore- father, prepared to sacrifice his son Isaac to God. The Dome of the Connect to the Issues Rock and a nearby mosque, Al- religious Aqsa, are located on the Temple Mount next to the Western Wall. conflict Because these most holy sites are so close together, they have been the What prob- site of clashes between Jews and Muslims. lems might emerge when three different A History of Unrest religious groups claim the same The nations of the Eastern Mediterranean have been plagued with a PLACE Muslim visitors area as a holy history of political tension and unrest. The Ottoman Empire, a Muslim gather at the Dome of place? government based in Turkey, ruled the Eastern Mediterranean lands the Rock, a holy site in the city of Jerusalem. A. Answer Each from 1520 to 1922. But the Ottoman Empire grew weaker and less able group may want How did control of exclusive use of to solve problems with groups seeking independence. By the beginning Jerusalem change the area, angering of the 20th century, its collapse was not far away. The Ottoman Empire over many centuries? the other groups. sided with Germany during World War I. At the end of the war, the Ottoman Empire fell apart. Britain and France received the lands in the Eastern Mediterranean as part of the war settlement. THE LEGACY OF COLONIALISM After World War I, Britain and France Background divided the Ottoman lands in the Eastern Mediterranean region. France The League of took the northern portion, including the present-day countries of Nations gave the Ottoman lands to Lebanon and Syria. Britain controlled the southern section, which SW ASIA France and Britain. included the present-day nations of Jordan and Israel. Britain and France were supposed to rule these lands until they were ready for inde- pendence. During the time of their control, the French frequently played different religious groups against each other. Those tensions remain in the region today. The Syrians hated the French and in the 1920s and 1930s rebelled against them. Lebanon became independent in 1943, and Syria gained independence in 1946. BRITISH CONTROL PALESTINE The land controlled by Britain was known as Palestine. In the 19th century, a movement called Zionism began. Its goal was to create and support a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Jewish settlers started buying land and settling there. By 1914, just before World War I, about 12 percent of the population in Palestine was Jewish. After the war, the British took command of the region and continued to allow Jewish immigration to Palestine. Early The Eastern Mediterranean 511 510-515-Chapter22 10/16/02 11:28 AM Page 512 Creation of Israel 1922 Today Beirut Beirut British mandate Present day Israel Damascus Damascus LEBANON French mandate LEBANON Occupied by Israel SYRIA GOLAN SYRIA Sea Sea HEIGHTS Haifa IRAQ Haifa IRAQ Mediterranean Mediterranean r r e e v v i i R R Tel Aviv- WEST n Tel Aviv- WEST n a a Yafo BANK d Yafo BANK d r r o Amman o Amman J J Jerusalem Jerusalem GAZA STRIP PALESTINE Dead Dead Sea Sea N N ISRAEL W E W E TRANSJORDAN JORDAN S S EGYPT EGYPT Arabia SAUDI ARABIA SINAI SINAI PENINSULA PENINSULA 0 50 100 miles 0 50 100 miles Gulf of Gulf of Aqaba 0 50 100 kilometers Aqaba 0 50 100 kilometers Lambert Conformal Conic Projection Lambert Conformal Conic Projection SKILLBUILDER: Interpreting Maps PLACE Which bodies of water form a natural boundary between Jordan and Israel? PLACE Which three areas are occupied by Israel? on, Arabs and Jews in the region cooperated. But as more and more Jews poured into Palestine to escape persecution in Germany, the Arabs resisted the establishment of a Jewish state. In 1939, to reduce tensions the British halted Jewish immigration to Palestine. As you study the map on this page, you will see that the area con- trolled by the British was divided into two sections—Transjordan and Palestine. The land was divided to relieve tensions between Arabs and Jews. An Arab government jointly ruled Transjordan with the British. Britain controlled Palestine, along with local governments that included both Jews and Arabs. CREATING THE STATE OF ISRAEL At the end of World War II, thou- B. Answer Israel sands of Jewish survivors of the Holocaust wanted to settle in Palestine. held more land and occupied Palestine was considered the Jewish homeland. World opinion sup- certain Arab ported the establishment of a Jewish nation-state. Britain eventually territories. referred the question of a Jewish homeland to the United Nations. In 1947, the United Nations developed a plan to divide Palestine into two states—one for Arabs and one for Jews. Using the Atlas Arabs in the region did not agree with the division. However, the nation Use the Atlas of Israel was established on May 14, 1948. Immediately, the surrounding on page 480. Arab nations of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and How was the land Israel occupied in Yemen invaded Israel to prevent the establishment of the state. Jewish 1967 different troops fought back. By the 1950s, Israel was a firmly established nation. from the land it The 1948 war was the beginning of hostilities that continue to this day. held in 1948? 512 CHAPTER 22 510-515-Chapter22 10/16/02 11:28 AM Page 513 Caught in the middle of this turmoil were Palestinian Arabs and Christians. Many of these people had roots in Palestine that went back for centuries. They either fled their homes or were forced into Background UN-sponsored refugee camps just outside Israel’s borders. The land des- A refugee is a ignated for the Palestinians on the West Bank and Gaza Strip is under person who leaves Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) home or country Israeli control. In the 1960s, the to find safety in was formed to regain the land for Palestinian Arabs. Over the years, the another location. PLO has pursued political and military means to take possession of Arab land in Israel and allow refugees to return to their homes. Modernizing Economies The nations in the Eastern Mediterranean subregion are relatively young. Most became independent shortly after World War II. Cyprus received its independence from Britain in 1960. These nations face many economic problems.
Recommended publications
  • Supporting Fruit Fly Pest Prevention in the Balkans and the Eastern Mediterranean
    September 2015 Supporting fruit fly pest prevention in the Balkans and the Eastern Mediterranean The challenge… In parts of the Balkans and the eastern Mediterranean, the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) causes major damage to fruit and vegetable production. The pest reduces fruit production and increases insecticide use, and has a direct impact on the production costs associated with agricultural commodities. Moreover, the recent emergence of exotic fruit fly species in North Africa and the Middle East poses a major threat to fruit and vegetable production in the Balkans and Eastern Mediterranean, since this region is put at risk by the invasive fruit fly species. The project… A regional European project was designed to increase awareness, cooperation and technical capabilities to prevent, detect and suppress established and exotic tephritid pest outbreaks. The sterile insect technique (SIT) facilitates the suppression of fruit fly populations by mass-rearing large numbers of males which, after being exposed to a short burst of radiation, are rendered sterile. When released into the wild, these sterilized males breed with females who, in turn, produce eggs that do not hatch. To overcome the fruit fly problem, the SIT is applied as part of an area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) approach, integrated with other Mediterranean fruit flies in mandarin fruit. control methods. Supported by the IAEA Peaceful Uses Initiative (PUI) and the Croatian Ministry of Agriculture, fruit flies, which emerged from about 700 million sterile pupae—were released in the Neretva Valley pilot SIT area. In addition, traps and attractants were procured for all participating Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's New Moves in the Eastern Mediterranean
    Turkey’s New Moves in the Eastern Mediterranean by Dr. George N. Tzogopoulos BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 2,110, August 1, 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In July 2021, Israel expressed full support to the Republic of Cyprus in the wake of the unilateral reopening of the Varosha coastline by Turkey. Last year, it also showed solidarity with Athens during Greek-Turkish tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean. While the tripartite partnership is progressing, Ankara is seeking to expand its footprint in the region and is pursuing a two-state solution in Cyprus. It is also applying a new foreign policy methodology to Greece while remaining adamant in its demands. Turkey’s new policy vis-à-vis Cyprus, based on a two-state solution, is being heavily criticized by the international community. In a press statement, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken expressed American support for a Cypriot-led comprehensive settlement to reunify the island as a bizonal, bicommunal federation. Also, the decision by Ankara to reopen the coastline of Varosha, a city on the eastern edge of the island that was abandoned after the 1974 military invasion, united the 15 members of the UN Security Council in condemnation. On July 23, the Security Council reaffirmed the status of Varosha as set out in previous resolutions, including 550 (1984) and 789 (1992). Israel is committed to strengthening its collaboration with both Greece and Cyprus. The July phone call between presidents Isaac Herzog and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan did not prevent Jerusalem from expressing deep concern about Turkish announcements regarding Cyprus. FM Yair Lapid hosted his counterparts Nikos Dendias on July 21 and Nikos Christodoulides on July 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics: the Growing Role of Gulf States in the Eastern Mediterranean
    Between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics: The Growing Role of Gulf States © 2021 IAI in the Eastern Mediterranean by Adel Abdel Ghafar ABSTRACT The role played by countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in the Eastern Mediterranean is becoming increasingly ISSN 2610-9603 | ISBN 978-88-9368-177-3 important. This calls for an assessment of their evolving relationship with countries in the region, as well as their involvement in the Libyan conflict. Increased involvement by Gulf actors may inflame existing regional rivalries and geopolitical tensions. The interests of GCC countries in the Eastern Mediterranean are first analysed in the broader context of regional rivalries. Special attention is then devoted to Egypt, Libya, Lebanon, Greece and Cyprus, while considering the role of other key regional actors such as Turkey and Israel. Recommendations on why and how the new US administration should intervene to decrease regional tensions are provided. Gulf countries | Eastern Mediterranean | Turkish foreign policy | Egypt | keywords Libya | Lebanon | Greece | Cyprus | Israel IAI PAPERS 21 | 06 - FEBRUARY 2021 21 | 06 - FEBRUARY IAI PAPERS Between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics: The Growing Role of Gulf States in the Eastern Mediterranean Between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics: The Growing Role of Gulf States in the Eastern Mediterranean © 2021 IAI by Adel Abdel Ghafar* Introduction In August 2020, United Arab Emirates (UAE) Minister of State Anwar Gargash tweeted: “the signing of the maritime boundary demarcation agreement between Egypt and Greece is a victory for international law over the law of the jungle”.1 This thinly veiled insult, directed at Turkey, was the latest salvo in the growing competition in the Eastern Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Mediterranean in Uncharted Waters
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN IN UNCHARTED WATERS EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN IN UNCHARTED WATERS Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities Perspectives ISBN: 978-605-4679-18-8 EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN IN UNCHARTED WATERS Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities Edited by Prof. Michaël Tanchum Published by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. All rights reserved. This publication reflects the views of the authors only which had the freedom to choose any terminology they wanted to express their free opinion. Konrad–Adenauer–Stiftung Derneği Türkiye Temsilciliği Ahmet Rasim Sokak No: 27 06690 Çankaya-Ankara/TÜRKİYE Tel. : +90 312 440 40 80 Faks : +90 312 440 32 48 E-mail : [email protected] Web : www.kas.de/tuerkei ISBN : 978-605-4679-18-8 Designed & Printed by: OFSET FOTOMAT +90 312 395 37 38 Ankara, 2021 5 | Preface Walter Glos 7 | Introduction Ercan Çitlioğlu 11 | The Geopolitics Of The Eastern Mediterranean Crisis: A Regional System Perspective on the Mediterranean’s New Great Game Michaël Tanchum 27 | TRNC-RoC Cooperation: A Critical Missing Piece for Eastern Mediterranean Stability Mustafa Çıraklı 38 | The Eastern Mediterranean as an Emerging Crisis Zone: Greece and Cyprus in a Volatile Regional Environment Ioannis N. Grigoriadis 47 | Turkey in an Increasingly Complex Eastern Mediterranean: How Turkey Can Defend its Interests and Alleviate its Isolation in the Region Yelda Ongun 59 | Escalating Complexity in Libya’s Ongoing Conflict Mohamed Eljarh 69 | Egypt’s Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas in the Eastern Mediterranean: the Coal and Steel of the 21St Century?
    EMERGING LEADERS PERSPECTIVES Natural Gas in the Eastern Mediterranean: The Coal and Steel of the 21st Century? By Kevin Johnson, Alex Ross, Endy Zemenides June 2015 Executive summary play as important a role in the region as coal and steel played in powering European integration. US strategic Over the past decade, significant natural gas deposits interests will be advanced by such regional coopera- have been found in the Levant Basin of the eastern tion, and the United States can play a key role in (a) Mediterranean. A 2010 US Geological Survey estimat- advancing the commercial viability of eastern Medi- ed that the Levant Basin may contain undiscovered terranean gas fields, (b) securing the resources, and (c) oil resources of 1.7 billion barrels and undiscovered developing regional structures. natural gas resources of 122 trillion cubic feet. In the short term, already commercially viable gas fields in the Exclusive Economic Zones of Israel and Cyprus will transform the economies of those states and promote their energy independence. These resources could also bolster Egypt and Jordan, where energy shortages could threaten the regimes. In the medium and long term, the energy resources of the eastern Mediterra- nean could help reduce Europe’s energy dependence on Russia to a degree. Perhaps the most intriguing prospect these resources present is the development of a structure for regional cooperation that promotes peace in this volatile region. Energy cooperation has already become the basis of unprecedented relations between Israel and Cyprus, and also between Greece, Cyprus, and Egypt. There are several indications that it could significantly contribute to the reunification of Cyprus, a lessening of Israeli-Arab tensions, and to better Greco-Turkish and Israeli-Turkish relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward an Eastern Mediterranean Integrated Gas Infrastructure?
    FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY PAPER 2016 | NO. 20 TOWARD AN EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN INTEGRATED GAS INFRASTRUCTURE? SHAUL ZEMACH © 2016 The German Marshall Fund of the United States Please direct inquiries to: The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1744 R Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 F 1 202 265 1662 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at http://www.gmfus.org/listings/research/type/publication. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the author alone. About the Foreign and Security Policy Program The Foreign and Security Program (FSP) at GMF comprises a stream of activities furthering objective analysis and debate on geopolitical questions of transatlantic concern. The program spans regional and functional issues, from NATO affairs to energy security, including challenges and opportunities in Europe’s East, the strategic environment in the Mediterranean, and the role of Turkey as a transatlantic partner. About GMF The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan. GMF contributes research and analysis and convenes leaders on transatlantic issues relevant to policymakers. GMF offers rising leaders opportunities to develop their skills and networks through transatlantic exchange, and supports civil society in the Balkans and Black Sea regions by fostering demo- cratic initiatives, rule of law, and regional cooperation. Founded in 1972 as a non-partisan, non-profit organization through a gift from Germany as a permanent memorial to Marshall Plan assistance, GMF maintains a strong presence on both sides of the Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • MIXED MIGRATION FLOWS in the MEDITERRANEAN Compilation of Available Data and Information February 2020
    MIXEDMIXED MIGRATION FLOWSMIGRATION IN THE MEDITERRANEANFLOWS IN THE CompilationMEDITERRANEAN of Available Data and Information FebruaryCompilation 2020 of Available Data and Information June 2019 migration.iom.int displacement.iom.int [email protected] IOM Italy 2018 - Informative session upon disembarkation, Sicily MIXED MIGRATION FLOWS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN Compilation of Available Data and Information February 2020 Migrants rescued last March in the Channel of Sicily by Italian Coast Guard. © Francesco Malavolta/IOM 2015 Contents Highlights ...................................................3 Policy Developments EU – Turkey Statement and the Eastern Mediterranean route ..............................4 Overview of Arrivals & Registered Irregular Apprehensions. .5 Overview Maps ..............................................6 About .....................................................10 Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) ........................10 DTM Europe .............................................10 Photo/ cover page: One part of a reception centre in Bira, Bosnia and Herzegovina. IOM BIH/2019 2 MIXED MIGRATION FLOWS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN Compilation of Available Data and Information February 2020 HIGHLIGHTS A total of 6,7321 migrants and refugees arrived in Europe through A total of 2,175 migrants and refugees were registered entering Spain different land and sea routes in February 2020, which is 18 per cent in February 2020, 8 per cent less than the previous month (2,365 in less than the 8,223 registered in the previous month (January 2020), January 2019), more than the half of the 1,366 registered in February 58 per cent more than the 4,268 sea and land arrivals registered in 2019 and 43 per cent more than the 1,518 registered in the same February last year, 50 per cent more than the 4,487 arrivals registered period of 2018. Among the total arrivals to Spain in 2020, 79 per cent in February 2018, and 43 per cent less than the 11,808 reported in arrived by sea: this includes 51 per cent of the total arrivals to the February 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Associated Regional Chronologies for the Ancient Near East and the Eastern Mediterranean (ARCANE)
    EUROPEAN SCIENCE FOUNDATION Associated Regional Chronologies for the Ancient Near East and the Eastern Mediterranean (ARCANE) An ESF Standing Committee for the Humanities (SCH) Research Networking Programme Chronology underpins all archaeological and historical studies. To establish the proper sequence of events is a prerequisite for writing history. The synchronization of chronologies, and therefore of the histories, of the various areas of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Near East is an essential task without which the development of civilizations, their reciprocal influences, their convergence and divergence, cannot be described and understood. The broad chronological framework of these civilizations had been outlined by scholars by the 1960s. Since then, however, the multiplication of excavations and the widespread use of radiocarbon dates have revolutionized our knowledge. More discoveries have been made in the last forty years than in the preceding century. New schemes of periodization have been formulated; new chronologies worked out, and new synchronisms proposed, based on a large variety of sometimes conflicting data originating from expanded geographical horizons. As a result, disagreements between specialists are numerous and profound, controversies frequent and uncertainties widespread. In particular, the same term may be used by different scholars to designate periods which have rather different archaeological definitions and time spans. In such extreme cases, scholarly communication is hindered. To remedy an analogous situation, specialists in the archaeology and chronology of the second millennium BC in the Eastern Mediterranean, from Anatolia to Egypt, have coordinated international research during the last decade within the framework of SCIEM 2000 (The Synchronization of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium BC) in order to resolve major problems related to terminology, synchronization and absolute chronology.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Mediterranean Turkey's Legal and Political Views-5 February 2020
    12.02.2020 EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN TURKEY’S LEGAL AND POLITICAL VIEWS Çağatay Erciyes Ambassador ‐ Director General for Bilateral Political & Maritime‐Aviation‐Border Affairs ‐MFA ‐ ANKARA 5 February 20205 February Ç.Erciyes 2020 ‐ Brussels 1 EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN 1. Maritime Boundary Delimitation 2. Legal Framework 3. EU’s Biased Approach 4. Political Framework ‐Turkey’s Position 5. Turkey‐Libya MBD 5 February 2020 Ç.Erciyes 2 1 12.02.2020 BLACK SEA o Enclosed Sea o 6 Littoral States o 12 nm territorial sea limit o NO MBD DISPUTE Turkey-USSR Turkey-USSR Turkey-USSR 6 February 1987 23 June 1978 17 April 1973 Delimitation Agreement Delimitation Agreement Delimitation Protocol (EEZ) (CS) (TS) All 3 confirmed by Russian Federation on 17 September 1992 officially by a VN Turkey-Bulgaria Turkey-Ukraine Turkey-Georgia 4 December 1997 30 May 1994 14 July 1997 Delimitation Agreement Delimitation Agreement Delimitation Protocol (CS-EEZ-TS) (CS-EEZ-TS) (CS-EEZ-TS) 5 February 2020 Ç.Erciyes 3 AEGEAN SEA 2 Littoral States Number of interrelated outstanding issues. 6 nm territorial sea limit. No CS delimitation No maritime boundary agreement. Moratorium (1976 Bern Agreement) Exploratory Talks (2002-2016) 5 February 2020 Ç.Erciyes 4 2 12.02.2020 MEDITERRANEAN SEA 10 countries / 6‐12 nm territorial sea limit / Overlapping Maritime Boundary Claims / Syria‐Cyprus‐ Middle East Issues / Energy Flashpint 280 nm 5 February 2020 Ç.Erciyes 5 MEDITERRANEAN SEA Generally CS/EEZ delimitation issues remain dormant until coastal states compete for off‐shore resources
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Dialogue
    PRESS - INFO - PRESS MEDITERRANEAN DIALOGUE The Washington Summit will give fresh impetus to developing NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue, which was launched in 1994 and currently involves six non-NATO countries: Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia. The Dialogue is aimed at creating good relations and better mutual understanding throughout the Mediterranean, and at promoting security and stability in the region. It reflects the view that security in that region is linked to security in Europe. Political discussions with participating countries provide an opportunity to share views on a range of security issues relevant to the region. Moreover, an annual work programme sets out measures for practical cooperation that focus on building confidence through cooperation on security related issues in the military field, as well as in the areas of information, civil emergency planning and science. All participating countries are offered the same basis for discussion and activities but the level of engagement varies from country to country. Activities take place on a self-funding basis. This limits the capacity of some countries to participate. In December 1998, NATO Foreign Ministers agreed to explore ways of enhancing cooperation with Mediterranean Dialogue countries. As a result, Heads of State and Government have decided to enhance both the political and practical dimensions of the Dialogue, including through further opportunities for discussion and strengthened cooperation in areas where NATO can bring an added value, particularly in the military field, and where the Dialogue countries have expressed interest. NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue complements other international efforts in the region such as the European Union’s Barcelona Process, the Middle East Peace Process, and the Mediterranean initiatives of the Western European Union (WEU) and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
    [Show full text]
  • DESPERATE JOURNEYS Refugees and Migrants Entering and Crossing Europe Via the Mediterranean and Western Balkans Routes
    Bureau for Europe February 2017 DESPERATE JOURNEYS Refugees and migrants entering and crossing Europe via the Mediterranean and Western Balkans routes © UNHCR/Andrew McConnell The number of refugees and migrants arriving by ans and others to the enclaves of Melilla and Ceuta. SUMMARY sea to Europe decreased significantly in 2016 from However the numbers are much lower than those 2015 with a further decrease since March mostly in the Central Mediterranean and the total number due to fewer people using the Eastern Mediterra- of arrivals in Spain in 2016 still dropped slightly nean route. Most refugees and migrants entered from those of 2015 due to fewer land arrivals. 2016 the European Union (EU) through three primary has now become the deadliest year on record with routes: the Central Mediterranean route from North 5,096 deaths at sea recorded. Africa to Italy, the Eastern Mediterranean route from Turkey to Greece, Bulgaria, and Cyprus, and the After arriving in Europe, many refugees and mi- Western Mediterranean route from North Africa to grants moved onwards across different countries Spain. The movement along these three routes, as within and outside the EU, on many occasions using well as onward movement through the Balkans and smugglers. However, larger numbers of people ar- onwards from Italy are the focus of this short report riving in Italy stayed in Italy, due primarily to restric- analyzing trends in 2016. Despite border restric- tions imposed by neighbouring states at the north- tions imposed at several points along key routes, ern borders, with over 176,000 people in reception thousands entered and moved through Europe centres across the country as of the end of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN in UNCHARTED WATERS: Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN IN UNCHARTED WATERS: Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN IN UNCHARTED WATERS: Perspectives on Emerging Geopolitical Realities Prof. Michaël Tanchum Editor All rights reserved. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Derneği Türkiye Temsilciliği Ahmet Rasim Sokak No: 27 06990 Çankaya-Ankara Tel.: +90-312-440 40 80 Fax: +90-312-440 32 48 E-Mail: [email protected] www.kas.de/tuerkei This publication reflects the views of the authors only which had the freedom to choose any terminology they wanted to express their free opinion. Table of Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Walter Glos Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 Ercan Çitlioğlu The Geopolitics of the Eastern Mediterranean Crisis: A Regional System Perspective on the Mediterranean's new Great Game ................................................................................................ 7 Michaël Tanchum TRNC-RoC Cooperation: A Critical Missing Piece for Eastern Mediterranean Stability .............. 18 Mustafa Çıraklı The Eastern Mediterranean as an Emerging Crisis Zone: Greece and Cyprus in a Volatile Regional Environment ................................................................................................................. 25 Ioannis N. Grigoriadis Turkey in an Increasingly Complex Eastern Mediterranean:
    [Show full text]