Ion Exchange Processes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ion Exchange Processes SM TECHNIFAX® Ion exchange processes TF Ion exchange is an effective, Table 1 — Types of ion exchange ION EXCHANGE -24 versatile means of conditioning MATERIALS materials boiler feedwater. The term “ion Ion exchange processes are Capacity exchange” describes the process: Exchangers kgr/ft3 versatile — specific types of ions as water flows through a bed of can be removed from water CATION ion exchange material, undesir- Inorganic (zeolites) able ions are removed and depending on the choice of Natural (greensand) 3–5 replaced with less objectionable exchange material and regenerant Synthetic 12–16 used. ones. Organic Sulfonated coal — 5–7 For example, in softening pro- (carbonaceous) cesses, calcium and magnesium Development Synthetic – (phenolic types) 6–18 ions (hardness) are exchanged (styrene base) 20–30 Slightly more than 100 years ago, for sodium ions. In dealkali- two English agricultural chemists, ANION zation, the ions contributing to H. S. Thompson and J. Thomas Inorganic Not widely alkalinity (carbonate, bicarbon- Metallic oxides used Way, noted that certain soils had ate, etc.) are removed and a greater ability than others to Organic replaced with chloride ions. absorb ammonia from fertilizers. Synthetic resins 10–22 Other dealkalization processes They found that complex silicates utilizing weak acid cation resin in the soil performed an ion or strong acid cation resin in a exchange function. They were split stream process, exchange Cation exchangers able to prepare materials of this cations with hydrogen. This There has been constant improve- type in the laboratory from forms carbonic acid which can ment in ion exchange materials solutions of sodium aluminate be removed in a decarbonator since the first use of natural and and sodium silicate. In 1906, tower. synthetic inorganic products. Robert Gans used materials of this Sulfonated coal, styrene-base Demineralization is simply type for softening water. The early resins, phenolic resins and acrylic replacing all cations with hy- materials used were slow in resins are some that have been drogen ions (H+) and all anions regenerating and lacked physical developed. Exchange capacities with hydroxide ions (OH–). Ion stability. These first synthetic, were greatly increased with the exchange materials are like inorganic exchangers were called development of the styrene-base storage batteries; they must be zeolites. Today, zeolites are exchangers. These resins are recharged (regenerated) periodi- almost totally replaced by syn- manufactured in spherical, stress cally to restore their exchange thetic ion exchange materials. The and strain-free form to resist capacity. With proper design basic types of ion exchangers in physical degradation. They are and operation, ion exchange use for water conditioning are stable at temperatures as high as processes are capable of remov- listed in Table 1. 300°F and are applicable over a ing selected ions almost com- wide pH range. More dense pletely (in some cases to a fraction of a part per million). NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY ONE NALCO CENTER NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60563-1198 SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES IN PRINCIPAL LOCATIONS AROUND THE WORLD Registered Trademarks of Nalco Chemical Company ©1978, 1998 Nalco Chemical Company All Rights Reserved Printed in U.S.A. 1-98 resins, those having greater Table 2 — Types of ion exchange processes degrees of copolymer cross- linking, were specially developed Typical Minerals Types of Minerals in Influent Exchanger Converted to for heavy duty industrial applica- tions. These products are more Cation (A) Ca(HCO ) → Na+ → NaHCO resistant to degradation by 3 2 3 CaSO → Exchanger → Na SO oxidizing agents such as chlorine, 4 2 4 and withstand physical stresses that fracture lighter duty materials. Cation (B) Ca(HCO ) → H+ → H CO Weakly acidic cation exchange 3 2 2 3 CaSO → Exchanger → H SO resins contain carboxylic and 4 2 4 phenolic groups. They remove Cation alkalinity by exchanging their → → (C) Ca(HCO3)2 H+ H2CO3 hydrogen ions for the cations Exchanger associated with the bicarbonate (Weak Acid) ion (calcium, magnesium, and sodium bicarbonates). Being Anion weakly acidic, they will not affect → – → (D) Na2SO4 Cl NaCl → → the cations associated with the NaHCO3 Exchanger NaCl anions of strong acids (chlorides or sulfates). Because of almost Anion 100% utilization of the regenerant → – → (E) H2CO3 OH H2O → → acid, chemical operating costs H2SO4 Exchanger H2O will be at a minimum, and there Conventional softening — process (A) will be little excess acid to produce Dealkalization by split stream softening — blending effluents from (A) and (B) objectionable waste effluents. Dealkalization by anion exchange — process (D) proceded by (A) Dealkalization by weak acid cation exchanger followed by conventional softening process (C) followed by (A) Anion exchangers Demineralizing — combination of (B) and (E) Anion exchange materials are classified as either weak base or strong base depending on the type of exchange group. Weak more economical removal of exchanger is more than 25% of base resins act as acid adsorbers, sulfates and chlorides. the total anions. When there is efficiently removing strong acids contamination of the water with These are two general classes of organic matter, a more porous such as sulfuric and hydrochloric. strong base anion exchangers, However, they will not remove form of Type I resin is recom- Types I and II, denoting differ- mended. The Type II anion carbon dioxide or silica. They are ences in chemical nature. Both used in systems where strong material is used in treating waters remove silica and carbon dioxide where the combined carbon acids predominate, where silica as well as other anions. Type I is reduction is not required, and dioxide and silica content is less more effective in removing silica, than 25% of the total anions. This where carbon dioxide is removed and is used when the combined in degasifiers. Preceding strong is often the case when carbon silica and carbon dioxide content dioxide is taken out in a degasifier base units in demineralizing of the water contacting the processes, weak base resins give ahead of the anion exchanger unit. 2 Physical Characteristics of Resin Anion and cation resins can be obtained in several different physical forms. They can be obtained with different ions located on the exchange site. This has importance in applica- tions such as mixed beds where minimal leakage rates are required even from a newly installed bed. Particle size can also be specified. Uniform particle sized (UPS) resins are now available where all beads fit into a very close particle size range. For practical purposes, all of the beads are the same size. Beds of UPS resins have some unique operating characteristics which offer advan- tages when they are used in mixed bed, layered bed, and packed bed applications. Figure 1 — Typical ion exchange unit Macroporous resins are highly porous which give them advan- Equipment operation Several newer designs for ion tages when used in processes that Ion exchange material is housed exchange are now coming into have high fouling potential. in specially constructed tanks common use. These are becoming (Figure 1) where it forms a bed, popular because of their advan- usually 30–60 inches deep. In tages of higher operating efficien- ION EXCHANGE some cases, it is supported by cies and lower leakage rates. In PROCESSES another bed of graded gravel or countercurrent regeneration Ion exchange processes fall into anthracite filter media. In other procedures, the regenerant flow is several categories: softening cases, some special methods of opposite in direction to the service (including removal of iron and support, without gravel or anthra- water flow. Therefore, the resin manganese), dealkalization, and cite, are used. During normal located in the bed where the demineralization. Examples of operation, water enters the top of finished water leaves the vessel, is these processes are listed in the tank through a pipe, which the most highly regenerated. This Table 2. distributes it over the surface of results in lower leakage rates and the exchanger bed. The treated slightly higher operating capaci- water is drawn off by collector ties at equal regenerant dosages to piping at the bottom. cocurrent operated vessels. 3 R–2 Ca+2 R– H+ R–2 Mg+2 R– Na+ R–2 Ca+2 –2 +2 R– H+ R Mg R– Na+ R–2 Mg+2 R–2 Ca+2 R–2 Ca+2 R– Na+ R–2 Mg+2 R– Na+ – + R– H+ R H Cocurrent vs countercurrent: With downflow operation, ion distribution at end of operating cycle is the same for cocurrent and countercurrent operation. But at end of regenerating cycle, ion distribution is revised when cocurrent is compared with countercurrent regeneration. Key to optimum results is quality of rinse water used with countercurrent regeneration. Figure 2 — Cocurrent vs. countercurrent regeneration 4 However, countercurrent vessels are more sensitive to operating problems. The bed must be immobilized during the regen- eration process and the influent water must be very low in suspended solids. Figure 2 illustrates what happens in the two regeneration modes at exhaustion and after regeneration. Packed bed systems essentially fill the vessel with resin. The systems are countercurrent in design and offer the low leakage rate advantage. However, packed beds also offer the advantage of Figure 3 — Valve arrangements for regeneration with salt reduced waste generation. Since there is no space for proper backwash, packed bed systems usually are built with external Ion exchange units are usually density of the ion exchanger. backwash tanks which allow the installed in duplicate to permit Figure 5 shows the expansion resin to be backwashed after it is continuous service during characteristics of typical cation sluiced out of the operating regeneration. Some typical and anion resins. equipment arrangements are vessel. All countercurrent ion The capacity of ion exchange shown in Figure 4. exchange systems require material varies according to the feedwater that is very low in amount and concentration of suspended solids.
Recommended publications
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,114,039 Rifqi (45) Date of Patent: Sep
    USOO611.4039A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,114,039 Rifqi (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 5, 2000 54 PROCESS FOR TREATING GLASS FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS SUBSTRATES 0579.399 1/1994 European Pat. Off.. O O O 592 237 4/1994 European Pat. Off.. 75 Inventor: Francoise Rifai, Paris, France 96 11888 4/1996 WIPO. 73 Assignee: Saint Gobain Vitrage, Courbevoie, OTHER PUBLICATIONS France Database WPI, Week 30, Derwent Publications Ltd., Lon don. GB: AN 96-292416, XPOO2O17839 & JP 08 124153 21 Appl. NoNo.: 08/930,2781930, A (Nippons a 1-1s Sheet Glass Ltd)s May 17, 1996, see abstract. 22 PCT Filed: Feb. 6, 1997 Chemical abstracts, vol. 114, No. 4, Jan. 28, 1991, Colum bus, Ohio, US; abstract No. 28896t, p. 299; P002017838, see 86 PCT No.: PCT/FR97/00233 abstract & JP 02 153847 A (Murase Glass Co Ltd) Jun. 13, S371 Date: Dec. 19, 1997 1990. Data Base WPI, Week 47, Derwent Publications Ltd., Lon S 102(e) Date: Dec. 19, 1997 don GB; AN 88-336490, XP002017840 & SU 1395597 A 87 PCT Pub. No.: WO97129058 (Buraev AMI), May 15, 1998, see abstract. 87) U O / Database WPI, Week 43, Derwent Publications Ltd., London PCT Pub. Date: Aug. 14, 1997 GB; AN 82–91185e; XP002017841 & JP 57 149 850 A 30 Foreign Application Prioritv D (Tokyo Shibaura Elec Ltd), Jun. 29, 1989, see abstract. 30 oreign Application Priority Data Database WPI, Week 14, Derwent Publications, Ltd., Lon Feb. 7, 1996 FR France ................................... 96 01484 don GB; AN95-102849, XPOO2017842, & JP 07 129 169 51 Int.Ill.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Ceramic Society 25Th International Congress On
    The American Ceramic Society 25th International Congress on Glass (ICG 2019) ABSTRACT BOOK June 9–14, 2019 Boston, Massachusetts USA Introduction This volume contains abstracts for over 900 presentations during the 2019 Conference on International Commission on Glass Meeting (ICG 2019) in Boston, Massachusetts. The abstracts are reproduced as submitted by authors, a format that provides for longer, more detailed descriptions of papers. The American Ceramic Society accepts no responsibility for the content or quality of the abstract content. Abstracts are arranged by day, then by symposium and session title. An Author Index appears at the back of this book. The Meeting Guide contains locations of sessions with times, titles and authors of papers, but not presentation abstracts. How to Use the Abstract Book Refer to the Table of Contents to determine page numbers on which specific session abstracts begin. At the beginning of each session are headings that list session title, location and session chair. Starting times for presentations and paper numbers precede each paper title. The Author Index lists each author and the page number on which their abstract can be found. Copyright © 2019 The American Ceramic Society (www.ceramics.org). All rights reserved. MEETING REGULATIONS The American Ceramic Society is a nonprofit scientific organization that facilitates whether in print, electronic or other media, including The American Ceramic Society’s the exchange of knowledge meetings and publication of papers for future reference. website. By participating in the conference, you grant The American Ceramic Society The Society owns and retains full right to control its publications and its meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Lead Leaching from Lead Crystal Glass
    Ceramics - Silikaty 37, s. 193-197 (1993) 193 REDUCTION OF LEAD LEACHING FROM LEAD CRYSTAL GLASS LUDMILA RYBARIKOVA Institute of Chemical Technology, Department of Glass and Ceramics, Technicka 5, 166 28 Praha 6 Received 8. 6. 1993 The surfaces of lead crystal glass ware containing 24 wt.% PbO were dealkalized with products of decompo­ ° sition of ammonium chloride at temperntures of 250 - 500 C. The deposit formed 011 the glris,q surface WClS f our1d to contain also lead, apart from potassium and sodium. The lead co11ter1t was low compm·ed to that of the alkalies. Tests of surf(lre chemical dumbility with respect to W(lter by the autoclave method (IS well as long-term surface lmching with acetic acid solution showed that dealkalization reduced considernbly the leaching of alkalies c1s well as that of lead. The efficiency of the treatment increased with tempernture, but even the glass surfaces dealkalized at the lowest temperntur·es, far below the Tg of the glass, crhibitcd a very satisfactory durnbility also 011 the long-term basis. INTRODUCTION The dissociation degree depends on temperature. Both 1-ICI and NH4 CI rnay take part in the dealka­ A low extraction of lead from the surface is re­ lization. quested in the case of lead crystal ware corning into It is assumed that apart from other alkalies, also contact with foodstuffs. Although most of the current other components are extracted from the glass surface glasses so far conform to the existing standard spe­ to a lesser degree, mostly calcium in the case of soda­ cifications, extensive research aimed at reducing the lime-silicate glasses [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Dupont™ Ligasep™ CO2 Removal by Dealkalization with Weak Acid
    Tech Fact Removal of CO2 in Dealkalization with Weak Acid Cation Resin Application Carbon dioxide (CO2) in water is present as an equilibrium mixture of the dissolved − 2− Description gas CO2, the weak acid H2CO3, and the HCO3 and CO3 anions associated with bicarbonate and carbonate alkalinity. The exact equilibrium ratio of these four species depends on the pH and temperature of the water. In a dealkalization system using a weak acid cation (WAC) resin in the H-form, the system removes alkalinity and partially softens the water. The WAC resin exchanges hydrogen ions for hardness ions associated with alkalinity. The resulting low pH converts bicarbonate and carbonate alkalinity to dissolved CO2 gas, which is then removed by degasification. Reliably and effectively removing as much CO2 as possible by degasification reduces the amount of alkalinity that could form posttreatment due to equilibrium conversion of CO2 and protects sensitive downstream processes and equipment from potential CO2-related corrosion. Solution DuPont™ Ligasep™ Degasification Modules use a proprietary polymethylpentene (PMP) hollow fiber membrane that provides an efficient transfer of gases between a liquid and a gas. The membrane does not allow water to pass through the membrane but freely allows gas to pass through. Equilibrium between the liquid and gas phase is offset when a vacuum and a strip gas is applied to one side of the membrane. This creates a driving force to move dissolved gases from the water to the gas side of the membrane. Ligasep™ Degasification Modules offer a clean, efficient and stable process to decarbonate water to concentrations of 5 mg/L or less of CO2 (8.35 mg/L as CaCO3) to reduce the load on downstream ion exchange equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials of Engineering
    Copyright (C) 1999 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of this product is subject to the terms of its License Agreement. Click here to view. Section 6 Materials of Engineering BY HOWARD S. BEAN Late Physicist, National Bureau of Standards HAROLD W. PAXTON United States Steel Professor Emeritus, Carnegie Mellon University JAMES D. REDMOND President, Technical Marketing Resources, Inc. MALCOLM BLAIR Technical & Research Director, Steel Founders Society of America ROBERT E. EPPICH Vice President, Technology, American Foundrymen's Society L. D. KUNSMAN Late Fellow Engineer, Research Labs, Westinghouse Electric Corp. C. L. CARLSON Late Fellow Engineer, Research Labs, Westinghouse Electric Corp. J. RANDOLPH KISSELL Partner, The TGB Partnership FRANK E. GOODWIN Vice President, Materials Science, ILZRO, Inc. DON GRAHAM Manager, Turning Programs, Carboloy, Inc. ARTHUR COHEN Manager, Standards and Safety Engineering, Copper Development Assn. JOHN H. TUNDERMANN Vice President, Research & Technology, INCO Alloys International, Inc. JAMES D. SHEAROUSE, III Senior Development Engineer, The Dow Chemical Co. PETER K. JOHNSON Director, Marketing & Public Relations, Metal Powder Industries Federation JOHN R. SCHLEY Manager, Technical Marketing, RMI Titanium Co. ROBERT D. BARTHOLOMEW Engineer, Powell Labs, Ltd. DAVID A. SHIFLER Metallurgist, Naval Surface Warfare Center HAROLD M. WERNER Consultant RODNEY C. DEGROOT Research Plant Pathologist, Forest Products Lab, USDA DAVID W. GREEN Supervisory Research General Engineer, Forest Products Lab, USDA ROLAND HERNANDEZ Research General Engineer, Forest Products Lab, USDA RUSSELL C. MOODY Supervisory Research General Engineer, Forest Products Lab, USDA JOSEPH F. MURPHY Supervisory General Engineer, Forest Products Lab, USDA ROBERT J. ROSS Supervisory Research General Engineer, Forest Products Lab, USDA WILLIAM T.
    [Show full text]
  • Glass Reactivity and Its Potential Impact on Coating Processes
    Glass Technical Document | TD-106 Glass Reactivity and its Potential Impact on Coating Processes Dr. Paul F. Düffer's article addresses, Introduction explains, and offers practical suggestions Since the Middle Ages, flat glass products and recommendations for three significant have maintained a well deserved problem areas related to glass surface reputation for longevity and reliability in reactivity and chemistry: service for a wide variety of end-uses. From the intricate patterns of stained-glass Stage 1 Corrosion in Glass Racks cathedral windows to the design and and Cases performance challenges presented by the Damaging Effects of Glass Fines architectural and transportation markets of (Glass Particulates) from Glass more recent history, glass has been Edging Operations applauded as one of the most noble and "Hard" Water Silicates Deposits dependable of building materials. Therefore, and Their Effect on Subsequent except for occasional breakage, it is not Glass Coating Operations surprising that the archetypal consumer views glass as being essentially immutable This article will benefit all Vitro and virtually impervious to chemical attack. Architectural Glass (formerly PPG However, there are specific environments Industries) glass customers, particularly commonly encountered by flat glass distributors, fabricators and those who coat producers and fabricators wherein the glass. vitreous surface willingly reveals its unique reactive characteristics. The following Abstract discussion reviews important aspects of these special environments and the salient It is generally unknown that commercial flat features of glass surface reactivity and the glass exhibits distinct behavioral potential impact on coating operations. characteristics which warrant that it be classified as an "active" rather than "passive" substrate for coating applications.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Level Waste Borosilicate Glass a Compendium of Corrosion Characteristics
    2 of 3 United States Department of Energy Office of Waste Management HIGH-LEVEL WASTE BOROSILICATE GLASS A COMPENDIUM OF CORROSION CHARACTERISTICS VOLUME 2 U. S. Department of Energy Office of Waste Management Office of Eastern Waste Management Operations High-Level Waste Division / / G-e:ZAt 7 2 of 3 United States Department of Energy Office of Waste Management HIGH-LEVEL WASTE BOROSILICATE GLASS A COMPENDIUM OF CORROSION CHARACTERISTICS VOLUME 2 U. S. Department of Energy Office of Waste Management Office of Eastern Waste Management Operations High-Level Waste Division HIGH-LEVEL WASTE BOROSILICATE GLASS: A COMPENDIUM OF CORROSION CHARACTERISTICS, VOLUME II Compiled and Edited by: J. C. Cunnane J. K Bates, C. R. Bradley, E. C. Buck, J. C. Cunnane, W. L. Ebert, X. Feng, J. J. Mazer, and D. J. Wronkiewicz Argonne National Laboratory J. Sproull Westinghouse Savannah River Company W. L. Bourcier Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory B. P. McGrail and M. K. Altenhofen Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory March 1994 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals have contributed to the preparation and review of this document. The authors would like to particularly acknowledge the contributions of the Technical Review Group (TRG), Peer Reviewers who provided technical direction during the preparation of the early drafts, and the document typists (particularly Roberta Riel) who persisted through interminable change cycles. A listing of these individuals appears below: Technical Review Group David E. Clark (Chairman) - University of Florida (USA) Robert H. Doremus - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (USA) Bernd E. Grambow - Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (Germany) J. Angwin C. Marples - Atomic Energy Authority (UK) John M. Matuszek - JMM Consulting (USA) Steering Group Rodney C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering UNDERSTANDING SHEAR-INDUCED HYDROLYSIS REACTIONS ON SODA LIME SILICA GLASS SURFACE A Dissertation in Chemical Engineering by Jiawei Luo 2018 Jiawei Luo Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2018 The dissertation of Jiawei Luo was reviewed and approved* by the following: Seong H. Kim Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Carlo G. Pantano Distinguished Professor of Materials Science and Engineering Dissertation Coadvisor Manish Kumar Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Kristen Fichthorn Merrell Fenske Professor of Chemical Engineering Professor of Physics Head of the Department Graduate Program *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Soda lime silica (SLS) glass is the most widely used glass materials in terms of mass in windows, bottles & containers, etc. One of the biggest challenge for SLS glass is its brittleness or propensity to be damaged at ambient conditions. One important reason is that cracks propagation on the SLS glass surface can be significantly accelerated by tensile stress induced corrosion reactions of amorphous silicate network, which breaks the Si-O-Si bonds to form two silanol groups, known as stress corrosion effect. It has also been found that stress corrosion reactions are faster with the increase of relative humidity (RH). The propagation of cracks will eventually lead to the failure of SLS glass. However, very little is known on the reactions between glass and water in the environment induced by interfacial shear, which results in the removal of SLS glass.
    [Show full text]
  • Dowex-Ion-Exchange-Resins-Water
    Lenntech Dow [email protected] Tel. +31-152-610-900 Water Solutions www.lenntech.com Fax. +31-152-616-289 DOWEX™ Ion Exchange Resins WATER CONDITIONING MANUAL WATER CONDITIONING MANUAL A Practical Handbook for Engineers and Chemists • Products • Design • Applications • Equipment • Operation • Engineering Information What this handbook is about… This is a handbook for people responsible for water supplies, but who are not necessarily water chemists. Here are basic data on ways of conditioning water with DOWEX™ ion exchange resins and straightforward explanations of how you can determine costs and results using the various methods on your own water. Better Water = Better Operation Because water is one of the most important raw materials brought into any plant, it follows that better water will cut overall costs and improve plant operating efficiency. These improvements can range from elimination of scale and corrosion in water- and steam-carrying equipment through reduced maintenance and outage time to better finished products. Ion Exchange Versatility DOWEX cation and anion exchange resins, used separately or in combination, with or without other water-treating materials, do an amazing variety of water-conditioning jobs; from simple softening of hard water supplies to removal of dissolved solids down to a part per billion! The following trademarks are used in this handbook: DOWEX™ ion exchange resins DOWEX™ MAC-3 ion exchange resin DOWEX™ MARATHON™ ion exchange resins DOWEX™ MONOSPHERE™ ion exchange resins DOWEX™ UPCORE™ Mono ion exchange resins FILMTEC™ reverse osmosis membranes UPCORE™ system TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction to Ion Exchange ................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 What is Ion Exchange? .................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Selecting DOWEX™ Resins .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glass Filler Material and Method of Production
    Europäisches Patentamt *EP001547572A1* (19) European Patent Office Office européen des brevets (11) EP 1 547 572 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.7: A61K 6/027, C03C 13/00, 29.06.2005 Bulletin 2005/26 C03C 13/04, C03C 21/00, A61K 6/083 (21) Application number: 03029538.0 (22) Date of filing: 22.12.2003 (84) Designated Contracting States: (72) Inventors: AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR • Hoescheler, Stefan HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR D-82211 Herrsching (DE) Designated Extension States: • Albrecht, Dirk AL LT LV MK D-82211 Herrsching (DE) • Stippschild, Andrea (71) Applicant: 3M ESPE AG D-86899 Landsberg (DE) 82229 Seefeld (DE) • Dede, Karsten D-86899 Landsberg (DE) (54) Glass filler material and method of production (57) The present invention relates to a glass filler and/or other lanthanidoxides, 0.05 - 4 mol% alkali metal material with an average particle size of 0.1 - 20 µm. It oxides (Na2O, Li2O, K2O, Rb2O, Cs2O), 0 - 25 mol% further relates to a method for producing a glass filler earth alkali metal oxides (MgO, CaO, SrO, BaO). material. The glass filler material comprises 65 - 99.95 The glass filler material shows a low concentration mol% silicon dioxide (SiO2), 0 - 15 mol% aluminum and/ of alkali ions and is used for composites with cationically or boron oxide (Al2O3,B2O3), 0 - 30 mol % zirconium curing properties and for dental composites and dental and/or titanium and/or hafnium oxide (ZrO2,TiO2, restoration materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealkalizers
    CAT800.1 Water King RF, MF and HF Series Dealkalizers This brochure lists all of the Water King dealkalizers. The RF series uses fiberglass tanks and the Task Master II™ – 1 ½ inch five-cycle valve in a top-mount configuration. The MF series uses galvanized steel tanks and the Task Master II™ – 1 ½ inch five-cycle valve in a side-mount configuration. The HF series uses either galvanized or lined and primed steel tanks with a side mount Task Master™ – 2 or 2 ½ inch five-cycle valve. ADVANTAGES OF DEALKALIZERS • Reduce blowdown and save energy, water and chemicals • Boost Boiler Performance. The amount of boiler blowdown is most often attributed to alkalinity. Concentrations of alkalinity beyond recommended operating limits cause problems of foaming and solids carryover to the steam. A dealkalizer will increase the number of times the make-up is concentrated in the boiler, reducing blowdown and boiler operating costs, foaming and carryover. • Reduce Condensate Line Corrosion. Reducing the amount of carbonic acid which forms from carbon dioxide reacting with condensed steam reduces the amount of expensive chemicals necessary to neutralize the acid and reduces return line corrosion. CAT800.2 • Reduce Chemical Treatment. The reduction of blowdown by dealkalization keeps water treatment chemicals in the boiler longer, and thus minimizes the amount of chemicals required for efficient, non-corrosive operation. • Lower Fuel and Operating Costs. Blowdown losses to the sewer are expensive because the lost water has been heated, softened, pumped, and chemically treated. APPLICATIONS • Boilers operating below 300 psi are the best application. Boilers at higher pressures generally require special water treatment, such as deionization or reverse osmosis, to reduce dissolved solids.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Durability of Multicomponent Silicate Glasses
    CHEMICAL DURABILITY OF MULTICOMPONENT SILICATE GL/.SSES By MORRIS FRANKLIN DILMORE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILL>ffiNT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1977 Dedicated to the fond and enduring memories of my mother and father, Rena Mae and Charlie Clarrie Dilmore (both deceased), and especially to my kind, loving and under- standing wife, Katrina Yvonne Goodwin Dilmore, forever I ACKN0WLEBG14ENTS The author wishes to express appreciation to his committee members and especially to his extremely capable committee chairman, Dr. Larry L. Hench. He also wishes to thank John T. Healey, Edwin C. Ethridge , Carlo G. Pantano, and special thanks to David E. Clark for their particular assistance in data interpretation and prepara- tion. In addition, thanks are extended to Helen Brasfield, Helen Heverling, and Carl Miles for their solution analysis testing and kind patience over the past three years. Also, special thanks are due to Mrs. Vicki Turner and Miss Alice Holt for their typing of the dissertation. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii ABSTRACT xviii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 Glass Durability Overview 5 Experimental Procedure Techniques 7 I. Bulk Corrosion 7 II. Powder Corrosion 9 III. Relative Humidity Weathering 9 Compositional Analysis 9 Solution Analysis 9 Surface Analysis 12 CHAPTER II AQUEOUS CORROSION OF MIXED-ALKALI SILICATE AND MIXED-ALKALI LIME SILICATE GLASSES 17 Introduction 17 Experimental Procedure 20 Results : Quaternary Glasses 27 Discussion: Quaternary Glasses 49 Results : Ternary Glasses 59 Discussion: Ternary Glasses 71 Conclusions 74 Table of Contents - continued.
    [Show full text]