Three Lectures on Astrophysics and Cosmology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Three Lectures on Astrophysics and Cosmology Three Lectures on Astrophysics and Cosmology • A Brief History of Cosmology • The Most Luminous Radio Galaxies • Galaxy Formation and Fluctuations in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation – What You Really Need to Know 1 A Brief History of Cosmology • Observational Cosmology to 1926 • Theoretical Cosmology to 1939 • Post-War Observational and Theoretical Cosmology to the 1990s • Where we are now 2 The Books of the Lecture Chapter 19 includes many To appear in March 2006. useful derivations and results 3 1. Observational Cosmology to 1926 4 Early Speculations The earliest cosmologies were speculative cosmologies. Rene´ Descartes The Thomas Wright An Thomas Wright An World (1636) Original Theory of the Original Theory of the Universe (1750) Universe (1750) 5 Early Speculations The hierarchical (fractal) Universe of Kant (1755) and Lambert (1761) Immanuel Kant had speculated that the flattening of celestial objects was due to their rotation. The early cosmologies were speculative ideas without quantitative support of observation. The first quantitative estimates of the scale and structure of the Universe were made by William Herschel. 6 William Herschel Herschel’s star counts provided the first quantitative evidence for the island Universe picture of Wright, Kant, Swedenborg, and Laplace. 7 Herschel’s 40-foot Telescope at Slough This photograph was taken by John Herschel within months of the announcement of the discovery of the photographic process by Daguerre and Fox-Talbot in 1839. 8 Herschel’s Model of the Galaxy Herschel assumed that all stars have the same absolute luminosities. The importance of interstellar extinction had yet to be appreciated. 9 John Michell and William Herschel • In 1767, Michell had already shown that Herschel’s assumption of the constancy of the absolute luminosities of stars was incorrect from observations of bright star clusters. This was the introduction of statistical concepts into stellar statistics. He pointed this out before Herschel created his map of the Galaxy. Herschel ignored the problem • 1802: Herschel measured the magnitudes of visual binary stars - he then agreed with Michell. • The 40-foot telescope showed that the stellar system was unbounded. • Herschel lost faith in his model of the Galaxy. 10 William Parsons 3rd Earl of Rosse Lord Rosse’s restored 72-inch telescope at Sketch of M51 by Lord Rosse from Birr Castle, Ireland observations with the 72-inch Telescope at Birr. 11 James Keeler and the Crossley Reflector at the Lick Observatory Keeler’s image of M51 of 1900. While commissioning the Crossley reflector, The Crossley reflector at the Lick Keeler obtained spectacular images of Observatory on Mount Hamilton. faint spiral galaxies. 12 The 100-inch Hooker Telescope at Mount Wilson The Telescope weighed 100 tonnes and was completed in 1918. This instrument dominated observational cosmology until the commissioning of the Palomar 200-inch telescope in 1948. 13 The “Great Debate” What is commonly referred to as “The Great Debate” revolved around two issues: (1) What is the size of our Galaxy? (2) Are the spiral nebulae Galactic or extragalactic objects? The structure of the Galaxy from Star Counts by Johannes Kapteyn (1921). Distribution of Globular Clusters in the Galaxy due to Shapley (1918). 14 Aspects of the “Great Debate” • J. Scheiner (1899) obtained a spectrogram of M31 and stated that the spectrum suggested a cluster of Sun-like stars. • The central role of van Maanen’s measurements of the proper motions of spiral arms from 1916 onwards. If the spiral nebulae were extragalactic, the motions of the arms would approach or exceed the speed of light. The observations were only definitively refuted by Edwin Hubble in 1933. • Variable stars in spiral nebulae were discovered by Duncan in 1922. This led to a flurry of activity. • Henrietta Leavitt had used observations with the 24-inch Bruce telescope at Arequita to discover the period luminosity relation for Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds. 15 The Characteristic Light Curve of a Cepheid Variable The Cepheid variable stars are characterised by a rapid rise in brightness followed by a slower decline. 16 Henrietta Leavitt and the Cepheid Variable Stars in the Magellanic Clouds (1912) Henrietta Leavitt, like Annie Cannon, was profoundly deaf. Her major contribution was the determination of the magnitude scale of stars in the North Polar Sequence from m = 2to21. Henrietta Leavitt’s period-luminosity relation for Cepheid variables in the Magellanic Henrietta Leavitt Clouds. 17 The Extragalactic Nature of the Spiral Nebulae In 1925, Hubble used Cepheid variables to show that M31 is outside our own Galaxy. In 1926, he presented a complete description of galaxies as extragalactic systems. Edwin Hubble 18 Hubble (1926) This paper was the pioneering description of galaxies as extragalactic systems. • Morphological classification of galaxies. • Numbers of different types. • Estimates of mass-to-luminosity ratios • Mean mass density of the Universe and comparison with Einstein’s static model. He noted that the 100-inch telescope could observe typical galaxies to about 1/600 of the radius of the Einstein Universe and that “. with reasonable increases in the speed of plates and sizes of telescopes it may become possible to observe an appreciable fraction of the Einstein Universe.” In 1928 George Ellery Hale began his campaign to raise funds for construction of the Palomar 200-inch telescope. He obtained a grant of $6,000,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation for the telescope before the year was out. 19 2. Theoretical Cosmology to 1939 20 Nikolai Lobachevsky and Janos Bolyai Working independently in Kazan in Russia and Transylvania in the period 1825–1830, Lobachevsky and Bolyai solved the problem of the existence of geometries which violated Euclid’s fifth axiom. These were the first self-consistent hyperbolic (non-Euclidean) geometries and led to Riemann’s introduction of quadratic differential forms and his discovery of spaces of positive (spherical) curvature. In his great text On the Principles of Geometry, Lobachevsky worked out the minimum parallax of any star in hyperbolic geometry θ =arctan(a/R) where a is the radius of the Earths orbit and R the radius of curvature of the geometry. In his textbook, he found a minimum value of R ≥ 1.66 × 105 AU. This was 8 years before Bessel’s announcement of the first successful parallax measurement of 61-Cygni. In his papers of 1829–30, Lobachevsky remarked, ‘There is no means other than astronomical observations for judging the exactness which attaches to the calculations of ordinary geometry.’ 21 The Route to General Relativity Unlike Einstein’s other great discoveries, the route to General Relativity was to prove to be long and tortuous. Four ideas were important in the development of the theory: • The influence of gravity on light. • The principle of equivalence. • Riemannian space-time. • The principle of covariance. The key technical developments were the mathematics of quadratic differential forms and the absolute differential calculus. 22 Einstein and Grossmann Towards the end of 1912, he realised that what was needed was non-Euclidean geometry. Einstein consulted his old school friend, Marcel Grossmann, about the most general forms of transformation between frames of reference for metrics of the form 2 µ ν ds = gµν dx dx . He came back with the answer that the most general transformation formulae were the Riemannian geometries, but that they had the ‘bad feature’ that they are non-linear. Einstein recognised that, on the contrary, this was a great advantage since any satisfactory theory of relativisitic gravity must be non-linear. 23 Einstein’s Universe Once General Relativity was formulated, Einstein realised in 1917 that he had the tools with which to derive the first fully self-consistent model of the whole Universe. At that time, the expansion of the Universe had not been discovered. To create a static Universe, he had to introduce the cosmological constant Λ. When the cosmological constant is introduced, the equation which describes the variation of the scale factor R with cosmic epoch becomes 2 d R 4πGρ0 1 = − + ΛR. dt2 3R2 3 The first term on the right-hand side describes the deceleration due to gravity. The second term describes what Zeldovich called ‘the repulsive effect of the vacuum’. The significance of the Λ-term was unknown at the time. 24 Einstein on the Introduction of the Cosmological Constant Einstein believed that he had incorporated Mach’s Principle into General Relativity. In his words, “The inertial structure of space-time was to be exhaustively conditioned and determined by the distribution of material throughout the Universe.” The extension of the field equations was “not justified by our actual knowledge of gravitation”, but was “logically consistent”. (1917) The cosmological term was “necessary only for the purpose of making possible a quasi-static distribution of matter, as required by the fact of the small velocities of stars”. (1934) 25 The de Sitter Solution Almost immediately, a major spanner was thrown in the works by Willem de Sitter, who showed that there existed solutions of Einstein’s cosmological field equations, even if there were no matter present in the Universe. 2 2 2 2 r 2 2 2 2 r 2 2 ds =dr − R sin (dφ +cos φ dθ )+cos c dt . R R The interpretation of the result was the subject of controversy, but it did show a redshift effect with distance which became known as the de Sitter effect. In 1919, Einstein showed that the cosmological constant appears naturally as a constant of integration in the development of General Relativity and is set to zero in the standard development. Many cosmologists argued that rather it should be determined observationally whether or not it is zero. 26 Lanczos (1922) In 1922, Cornelius Lanczos showed that, by a simple change of coordinates, the de Sitter solution could be interpreted as an expansion of the system of coordinates in hyperbolic space.
Recommended publications
  • The Planck Satellite and the Cosmic Microwave Background
    The Cosmic Microwave Background, Dark Matter and Dark Energy Anthony Lasenby, Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory and Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Cambridge Overview The Cosmic Microwave Background — exciting new results from the Planck Satellite Context of the CMB =) addressing key questions about the Big Bang and the Universe, including Dark Matter and Dark Energy Planck Satellite and planning for its observations have been a long time in preparation — first meetings in 1993! UK has been intimately involved Two instruments — the LFI (Low — e.g. Cambridge is the Frequency Instrument) and the HFI scientific data processing (High Frequency Instrument) centre for the HFI — RAL provided the 4K Cooler The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) So what is the CMB? Anywhere in empty space at the moment there is radiation present corresponding to what a blackbody would emit at a temperature of ∼ 2:74 K (‘Blackbody’ being a perfect emitter/absorber — furnace with a small opening is a good example - needs perfect thermodynamic equilibrium) CMB spectrum is incredibly accurately black body — best known in nature! COBE result on this showed CMB better than its own reference b.b. within about 9 minutes of data! Universe History Radiation was emitted in the early universe (hot, dense conditions) Hot means matter was ionised Therefore photons scattered frequently off the free electrons As universe expands it cools — eventually not enough energy to keep the protons and electrons apart — they History of the Universe: superluminal inflation, particle plasma,
    [Show full text]
  • International Comet Quarterly
    International Comet Quarterly Links International Comet Quarterly ICQ: Recommended (and condemned) sources for stellar magnitudes Cometary Science Center Comet magnitudes Below is a list that observers may use to evaluate whether the source(s) that they are Central Bureau for Astro. Tel. contemplating using for visual or V stellar magnitudes are recommended or not. Unfortunately, many errors have been found over the years in the both the individual variable-star charts of Minor Planet Center the AAVSO (ICQ code AC) and the AAVSO Variable Star Atlas (code AA); those variable-star EPS/Harvard charts were designed for the purpose of tracking the relative variation in brightness of individual variable stars, and they frequently are not adequately aligned with the proper magnitude scale. The new Hipparcos/Tycho catalogues have had new codes implemented (see below). New additions (and changes in categories) will be made to the following list as new information reaches the ICQ. MAGNITUDE-REFERENCE KEY Second-draft recommendation list, 1997 Dec. 1. Updated 2007 April 20 and 2017 Oct. 4. NOTE: For visual magnitude estimation of comets, NEVER USE SOURCES for which the available star magnitudes are only brighter than the comet! For example, the SAO Star Catalog is very poor for magnitudes fainter than 9.0, and should NEVER be used on comets fainter than mag 9.5. The Tycho catalogue should not be used for comets fainter than mag 10.5. (Even CCD photometrists should be wary of using bright stars for very faint comets; it is always best to use comparison stars within a few magnitudes of the comet when doing CCD photometry.) NOTE: It is highly recommended that users of variable-star charts also specify (in descriptive notes to accompany the tabulated data) the specific chart(s) used for each observation; this information will be published in the ICQ.
    [Show full text]
  • People and Things
    People and things Geoff Manning for his contributions Dirac Medal to physics applications at the Lab­ oratory, particularly in high energy At the recent symposium on 'Per­ physics, computing and the new spectives in Particle Physics' at Spallation Neutron Source. The the International Centre for Theo­ Rutherford Prize goes to Alan Ast- retical Physics, Trieste, ICTP Direc­ bury of Victoria, Canada, former tor Abdus Sa la m presided over co-spokesman of the UA 1 experi­ the first award ceremony for the ment at CERN. Institute's Dirac Medals. Although Philip Anderson (Princeton) and expected, Yakov Zeldovich of Abdus Sa la m (Imperial College Moscow's Institute of Space Re­ London and the International search was not able to attend to Centre for Theoretical Physics, receive his medal. Edward Witten Trieste) have been elected Hono­ of Princeton received his gold me­ rary Fellows of the Institute. dal alone from Antonino Zichichi on behalf of the Award Committee. Third World Prizes The 1985 Third World Academy UK Institute of Physics Awards of Sciences Physics Prize has been awarded to E. C. G. Sudarshan The Guthrie Prize and Medal of the from India for his fundamental con­ UK Institute of Physics this year tributions to the understanding of goes to Sir Denys Wilkinson of the weak nuclear force, in particu­ Sussex for his many contributions lar for his work with R. Marshak to nuclear physics. The Institute's on the theory which incorporates Glazebrook Prize goes to Ruther­ its parity (left/right symmetry) Friends and colleagues recently ford Appleton Laboratory director structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Cosmology," Organized by a Committee Chaired by David N
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, p. 4765, June 1993 Colloquium Paper This paper serves as an introduction to the following papers, which were presented at a colloquium entitled "Physical Cosmology," organized by a committee chaired by David N. Schramm, held March 27 and 28, 1992, at the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Physical cosmology DAVID N. SCHRAMM Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 The Colloquium on Physical Cosmology was attended by 180 much notoriety. The recent report by COBE of a small cosmologists and science writers representing a wide range of primordial anisotropy has certainly brought wide recognition scientific disciplines. The purpose of the colloquium was to to the nature of the problems. The interrelationship of address the timely questions that have been raised in recent structure formation scenarios with the established parts of years on the interdisciplinary topic of physical cosmology by the cosmological framework, as well as the plethora of new bringing together experts of the various scientific subfields observations and experiments, has made it timely for a that deal with cosmology. high-level international scientific colloquium on the subject. Cosmology has entered a "golden age" in which there is a The papers presented in this issue give a wonderful mul- tifaceted view of the current state of modem physical cos- close interplay between theory and observation-experimen- mology. Although the actual COBE anisotropy announce- tation. Pioneering early contributions by Hubble are not ment was made after the meeting reported here, the following negated but are amplified by this current, unprecedented high papers were updated to include the new COBE data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Propensity for Genius: That Something Special About Fritz Zwicky (1898 - 1974)
    Swiss American Historical Society Review Volume 42 Number 1 Article 2 2-2006 A Propensity for Genius: That Something Special About Fritz Zwicky (1898 - 1974) John Charles Mannone Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review Part of the European History Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Mannone, John Charles (2006) "A Propensity for Genius: That Something Special About Fritz Zwicky (1898 - 1974)," Swiss American Historical Society Review: Vol. 42 : No. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review/vol42/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Swiss American Historical Society Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Mannone: A Propensity for Genius A Propensity for Genius: That Something Special About Fritz Zwicky (1898 - 1974) by John Charles Mannone Preface It is difficult to write just a few words about a man who was so great. It is even more difficult to try to capture the nuances of his character, including his propensity for genius as well as his eccentric behavior edging the abrasive as much as the funny, the scope of his contributions, the size of his heart, and the impact on society that the distinguished physicist, Fritz Zwicky (1898- 1974), has made. So I am not going to try to serve that injustice, rather I will construct a collage, which are cameos of his life and accomplishments. In this way, you, the reader, will hopefully be left with a sense of his greatness and a desire to learn more about him.
    [Show full text]
  • TAPIR TheoreCal Astrophysics Including RelaVity & Cosmology HP
    TAPIR Theore&cal AstroPhysics Including Relavity & Cosmology hp://www.tapir.caltech.edu Chrisan O [email protected], Cahill Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Office 338 TAPIR: Third Floor of Cahill, around offices 316-370 ∼20 graduate students 5 senior researchers ∼15 postdocs 5 professors 2 professors emeritus lots visitors TAPIR Research TAPIR Research Topics • Cosmology, Star Forma&on, Galaxy Evolu&on, Par&cle Astrophysics • Theore&cal Astrophysics • Computa&onal Astrophysics • Numerical Rela&vity • Gravitaonal Wave Science: LIGO/eLISA design and source physics TAPIR – Theore&cal AstroPhysics Including Rela&vity 3 TAPIR Research Professors: Sterl Phinney – gravitaonal waves, interacHng black holes, neutron stars, white dwarfs, stellar dynamics Yanbei Chen – general relavity, gravitaonal wave detecHon, LIGO Phil Hopkins – cosmology, galaxy evoluHon, star formaon. Chrisan O – supernovae, neutron stars, computaonal modeling and numerical relavity, LIGO data analysis/astrophysics. Ac&ve Emeritus Professors: Peter Goldreich & Kip Thorne Senior Researchers (Research Professors)/Associates: Sean Carroll – cosmology, extra dimensions, quantum gravity, DM, DE Curt Cutler (JPL) – gravitaonal waves, neutron stars, LISA Lee Lindblom – neutron stars, numerical relavity Mark Scheel – numerical relavity Bela Szilagyi – numerical relavity Elena Pierpaoli (USC,visiHng associate) – cosmology Asantha Cooray (UC Irvine,visiHng associate) – cosmology TAPIR – Theore&cal AstroPhysics Including Rela&vity and Cosmology 4 Cosmology & Structure Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) and Beyond
    From the Big Bang to the Nobel Prize: Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) and Beyond Goddard Space Flight Center Lecture John Mather Nov. 21, 2006 Astronomical Search For Origins First Galaxies Big Bang Life Galaxies Evolve Planets Stars Looking Back in Time Measuring Distance This technique enables measurement of enormous distances Astronomer's Toolbox #2: Doppler Shift - Light Atoms emit light at discrete wavelengths that can be seen with a spectroscope This “line spectrum” identifies the atom and its velocity Galaxies attract each other, so the expansion should be slowing down -- Right?? To tell, we need to compare the velocity we measure on nearby galaxies to ones at very high redshift. In other words, we need to extend Hubble’s velocity vs distance plot to much greater distances. Nobel Prize Press Release The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2006 jointly to John C. Mather, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, and George F. Smoot, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA "for their discovery of the blackbody form and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation". The Power of Thought Georges Lemaitre & Albert Einstein George Gamow Robert Herman & Ralph Alpher Rashid Sunyaev Jim Peebles Power of Hardware - CMB Spectrum Paul Richards Mike Werner David Woody Frank Low Herb Gush Rai Weiss Brief COBE History • 1965, CMB announced - Penzias & Wilson; Dicke, Peebles, Roll, & Wilkinson • 1974, NASA AO for Explorers: ~ 150 proposals, including: – JPL anisotropy proposal (Gulkis, Janssen…) – Berkeley anisotropy proposal (Alvarez, Smoot…) – Goddard/MIT/Princeton COBE proposal (Hauser, Mather, Muehlner, Silverberg, Thaddeus, Weiss, Wilkinson) COBE History (2) • 1976, Mission Definition Science Team selected by HQ (Nancy Boggess, Program Scientist); PI’s chosen • ~ 1979, decision to build COBE in-house at GSFC • 1982, approval to construct for flight • 1986, Challenger explosion, start COBE redesign for Delta launch • 1989, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawking Radiation and the Expansion of the Universe
    Hawking radiation and the expansion of the universe 1 2, 3 Yoav Weinstein , Eran Sinbar *, and Gabriel Sinbar 1 DIR Technologies, Matam Towers 3, 6F, P.O.Box 15129, Haifa, 319050, Israel 2 DIR Technologies, Matam Towers 3, 6F, P.O.Box 15129, Haifa, 3190501, Israel 3 RAFAEL advanced defense systems ltd., POB 2250(19), Haifa, 3102102, Israel * Corresponding author: Eran Sinbar, Ela 13, Shorashim, Misgav, 2016400, Israel, Telephone: +972-4-9028428, Mobile phone: +972-523-713024, Email: [email protected] ABSTRUCT Based on Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle it is concluded that the vacuum is filed with matter and anti-matter virtual pairs (“quantum foam”) that pop out and annihilate back in a very short period of time. When this quantum effects happen just outside the "event horizon" of a black hole, there is a chance that one of these virtual particles will pass through the event horizon and be sucked forever into the black hole while its partner virtual particle remains outside the event horizon free to float in space as a real particle (Hawking Radiation). In our previous work [1], we claim that antimatter particle has anti-gravity characteristic, therefore, we claim that during the Hawking radiation procedure, virtual matter particles have much larger chance to be sucked by gravity into the black hole then its copartner the anti-matter (anti-gravity) virtual particle. This leads us to the conclusion that hawking radiation is a significant source for continuous generation of mostly new anti-matter particles, spread in deep space, contributing to the expansion of space through their anti-gravity characteristic.
    [Show full text]
  • Lensing and Eclipsing Einstein's Theories
    E INSTEIN’S L EGACY S PECIAL REVIEW Astrophysical Observations: S Lensing and Eclipsing Einstein’s Theories ECTION Charles L. Bennett Albert Einstein postulated the equivalence of energy and mass, developed the theory of interstellar gas, including molecules with special relativity, explained the photoelectric effect, and described Brownian motion in molecular sizes of È1 nm, as estimated by five papers, all published in 1905, 100 years ago. With these papers, Einstein provided Einstein in 1905 (6). Atoms and molecules the framework for understanding modern astrophysical phenomena. Conversely, emit spectral lines according to Einstein_s astrophysical observations provide one of the most effective means for testing quantum theory of radiation (7). The con- Einstein’s theories. Here, I review astrophysical advances precipitated by Einstein’s cepts of spontaneous and stimulated emission insights, including gravitational redshifts, gravitational lensing, gravitational waves, the explain astrophysical masers and the 21-cm Lense-Thirring effect, and modern cosmology. A complete understanding of cosmology, hydrogen line, which is observed in emission from the earliest moments to the ultimate fate of the universe, will require and absorption. The interstellar gas, which is developments in physics beyond Einstein, to a unified theory of gravity and quantum heated by starlight, undergoes Brownian mo- physics. tion, as also derived by Einstein in 1905 (8). Two of Einstein_s five 1905 papers intro- Einstein_s 1905 theories form the basis for how stars convert mass to energy by nuclear duced relativity (1, 9). By 1916, Einstein had much of modern physics and astrophysics. In burning (3, 4). Einstein explained the photo- generalized relativity from systems moving 1905, Einstein postulated the equivalence of electric effect by showing that light quanta with a constant velocity (special relativity) to mass and energy (1), which led Sir Arthur are packets of energy (5), and he received accelerating systems (general relativity).
    [Show full text]
  • Sandra Faber Receives $500,000 Gruber Cosmology Prize
    Media Contact: A. Sarah Hreha +1 (203) 432-6231 [email protected] Online Newsroom: www.gruber.yale.edu/news-media SANDRA FABER RECEIVES $500,000 GRUBER COSMOLOGY PRIZE FOR CAREER ACHIEVEMENTS Sandra Faber May 17, 2017, New Haven, CT – The 2017 Gruber Foundation Cosmology Prize recognizes Sandra M. Faber for a body of work that has helped establish many of the foundational principles underlying the modern understanding of the universe on the largest scales. The citation praises Faber for “her groundbreaking studies of the structure, dynamics, and evolution of galaxies.” That work has led to the widespread acceptance of the need to study dark matter, to an appreciation of the inextricable relationship between the presence of dark matter and the formation of galaxies, and to the recognition that black holes reside at the heart of most large galaxies. She has also made significant contributions to the innovations in telescope technology that have revolutionized modern astronomy. Through these myriad achievements, the Gruber citation adds, Faber has “aided and inspired the work of astronomers and cosmologists worldwide.” Faber will receive the $500,000 award as well as a gold medal at a ceremony this fall. Less than a hundred years ago, astronomers were still debating whether our Milky Way Galaxy was the entirety of the universe or if other galaxies existed beyond our own. Today astronomers estimate the number of galaxies within the visible universe at somewhere between 200 billion and 2 trillion. For more than four decades Faber—now Professor Emerita at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and Astronomer Emerita of the University of California Observatories—has served as a pivotal figure in leading and guiding the exploration of this unimaginably vast virgin scientific territory.
    [Show full text]
  • International Astrostatistics Association
    <IAA> International Astrostatistics Association IAA Newsletter – December 2014 Articles on Astrostatistics December 2014 issue Significance magazine 88 pages: 28 on astrostatistics Significance Magazine is a British published magazine-journal for those who are in the statistics and research community. The magazine, which is typically about fifty pages in length, is published five to six times a year and comes with the membership dues of the American Statistical Association (ASA) and Royal Statistical Society (RSS). The International Statistical Institute (ISI) also makes the magazine available to its membership. Given that the ASA and RSS have a combined membership in excess of 30,000, the magazine is read, at least in part, by a relatively large number of people. The December issue, published on 2 December, is 88 pages, with a special 28 page section on astrostatistics included. The section consists of eleven articles.You may access the articles through the URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sign.2014.11.issue-5/issuetoc 1 The cover portrays the subject of the initial article on meteor impacts. Each article comes with one or more nicely developed pictures. Tables and Graphics are also displayed. ARTICLES (pp 48-76) Life, the Universe, and Everything, Joseph M Hilbe (Arizona State Univ) 48 Will this century see a devastating meteor strike? Joseph M. Hilbe (Arizona State Univ) & Jamie Riggs (Northwestern Univ) 50 Impact records, Carlo Zapponi (Microsoft-UK) 54 The origin of structure, Benjamin Waldelt (Lagrange Institute, Paris) 56 Making sense of massive unknowns, Rafael de Souza (Eötvös Loránd Univ., Hungary) & Emille Ishida (Max Planck Institute, Garching, Ger) 59 Revealing the invisible, Jessi Cisewski (Carnegie Mellon Univ) 61 How many galaxies in the universe?, Vladimir Surdin (Moscow State Univ, Russia) 64 How do you weight a cluster of galaxies?, Madhura Killedar (Ludwig Maximilians Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Astronomicalsociety Ofedinburgh
    The AstronomicalSociety ofEdinburgh Journal 40 - December 1999 Harry Ford's modified Scotch Mount From the President - Alan Ellis 2 Cheap Astrophotography - a Variation on the Theme - Harry Ford 3 Scottish Astronomy Weekend - Dave Gavine 4 Leonids 1999 - Lorna McCalman 6 Other Observations - Dave Gavine 7 Popular Astronomy Class 7 Special Section on the Solar Eclipse of August 11 1999 8 Including "TheGreatHungarianEclipse" by GrahamYoung, plus reports from GerryTaylor, DaveGavine, MauriceFrank and GrahamRule James Melvill sees a great Comet in 1577 - Dave Gavine 13 Book Review - "The Young Astronomer" by Harry Ford 14 Scottish Astronomers' Group - Graham Rule 14 Published by the Astronomical Society of Edinburgh, City Observatory, Calton Hill, Edinburgh for circulation to members. Editor: Dr Dave Gavine, 29 Coillesdene Crescent, Edinburgh From the President Welcome to Edition 40 of the Society’s Journal. We have to thank Dave Gavine for editing this edition - and the other 39! Unfortunately, Dave has great difficulty in getting members to contribute articles so please consider writing about your astronomical interests whatever they might be - from reviews of books you have enjoyed to observations you have made. We have had quite a good year what with the eclipse and the Leonids - although the weather could have been a little more helpful for both these events. Charlie Gleed and Jim Douglas have continued to work on the Earlyburn site and we hope to start using it in the evenings soon - weather permitting. Recently the Observatory has featured in a BBC Scotland TV series in which Brian Kelly (formerly Dundee’s City Astronomer) may be seen sitting on the roof of the Playfair Building in a pink inflatable plastic arm-chair talking about aspects of astronomy.
    [Show full text]