III - The at large

Pierre Binétruy APC, Paris

CERN Summer Student Lecture Programme 2012 Outline

1. Detection of

2. Looking for standard candles to study

3. Towards the … 1. Detcton of dark mater

Coma cluster

Studying the velocity distribution of in the and using the

2 = - time averaged Fritz Zwicky F. Zwicky shows in 1933 that there is 400 times more mass than expected from the luminosity. rotation curves of galaxies

100 kpc , 1975

What is dark matter?

Not luminous matter

Not because their random motions (free streaming) would wash out any density fluctuations and prevent the formation of galaxies (hot dark matter)

We need cold dark matter (i.e. particles with smaller free streaming length), most probably in the form of weakly interacting massive particles or wimps. χχ χ χ χ χ χ

χ

Annihilation in the heart of the Sun Detection in underground labs or at the centre of our Direct detection χ χ

Underground labs (mines, tunnels…) arXiv:1207.5988 Annual modulation

At LHC, these particles are stable and leave the detector Unseen while taking away some of the energy :

Signature : missing energy wimp χ

Simulated in CMS detector If one discovers at LHC one or several weakly interacting massive stable particles, will this be dark matter?

Not necessarily :

• numerous tests to make to identify their properties: mass, coupling to other particles

• necessary to show that these particles exist in our environment • indirect detection (wimps accumulate at the centre of the Sun or of the galaxy where they annihilate into energetic neutrinos, χ gammas, electrons or positrons)

ICECUBE (S. Pole)

ν

Fermi ν γ ANTARES (Toulon) HESS telescope (Namibia) γ

Launch in 2008

γ from 10 keV to 300 GeV

Large Area Telescope (20 to 300 MeV)

γ

Measuring trajectories using Si and tungsten

Measuring energies with a calorimeter Rejecting charged cosmic rays through anticoincidence A few surprises! From PAMELA which detects antiprotons and positrons

antiproton flux

No excess in antiprotons

Excess in positrons

If it is dark matter, it is non-standard because it couples preferentially to leptons.

Astrophysical source? arXiv: 0905.0025 [astro-ph]

Detecting the primary particles responsible for cosmic rays: AMS on the ISS

(launch 16 May 2011)

permanent magnet (charged particles) AMS02 anchored on the ISS

20 GeV electron 42 GeV carbon

First events collected on 19 May 2011 2. Looking for standard candles Supernovae of type Ia may be used as standard candles to test the geometry of Distant supernovae appear less bright than in an expanding universe  accelerated expansion

mB = 5 log(H0dL) + M - 5 log H0 + 25

1-q0 luminosity distance d = l z ( 1 + ------z + …) L H0 2

q0 deceleration parameter Why do explosion of type Ia provide standard candles?

Origin: white dwarf where gravitational force is counterbalanced by electron degeneracy pressure (hence independent of the details of the chemical composition)

The star is completely disrupted and all the energy of the explosion goes into the expansion of the products.

But the luminosity depends on the amount of Ni synthesized; for instance, less Ni means lower luminosity, but also lower temperature in the gas and thus less opacity and more rapid energy escape: dimmer supernovae are quicker.

 Gamma ray bursts

Determine the luminosity through a relation between the collimation

corrected energy Eγ and the peak energy  Coalescence of supermassive black holes

3. Towards te big bang Electromagnetic wave Photon

Gravitational wave Graviton If gravitons were in thermal equilibrium in the primordial universe

density

γ

g When do gravitons decouple?

5 2 Interaction rate 2 5 T GN=1/MPl Γ~ GN T ~ ----4 MPl 2 Expansion rate H ~ T---- (radiation dominated era) MPl

T3 ----Γ ~ ---- H 3 MPl

Gravitons decouple at the Planck era : fossile radiation Gravitons of frequency f* produced at temperature T* provide a background observed at a redshifted frequency

1/6 1 T g f = 1.65 10-7 Hz ------* ----* ε ( 1GeV ) ( 100 )

-1 At production λ* = ε H* (or f* = H*/ ε)

Wavelength Horizon length Gravitons of frequency f* produced at temperature T* provide a background observed at a redshifted frequency

1/6 1 T g f = 1.65 10-7 Hz ------* ----* ε ( 1GeV ) ( 100 )

-1 At production λ* = ε H* (or f* = H*/ ε)

Wavelength Horizon length T g 1/6 f = 1.65 10-7 Hz ---1 ( -----* ) ( ----* ) ε 1GeV 100

for ε=1

ΩGW ~ρGW/ρc T g 1/6 The electroweak phase transition f = 1.65 10-7 Hz ---1 ( -----* ) ( ----* ) ε 1GeV 100

for ε=1

ΩGW

Gravitons produced at the electroweak phase transition would be observed in the LISA window. But are gravitons produced in sufficient numbers at the electroweak phase transition?

If the transition is first order, nucleation of true vacuum bubbles inside the false vacuum

Collision of bubbles and turbulence → production of gravitational waves Pros and cons for a 1st order phase transition at the Terascale:

• in the Standard Model, requires mh < 72 GeV (ruled out) • MSSM requires too light a stop but generic in NMSSM • possible to recover a strong 1st order transition by including H6 terms in SM potential • other symmetries than SU(2)xU(1) at the Terascale (→ baryogenesis)

Even closer to the big bang:

Planck era where is quantized

What is a quantum spacetime?

Maybe as different from our notion of a continuous spacetime as a solid piece of wood from an assemblage of atoms!

Notion of emergent spacetime → notion of emergent spacetime symmetries such as Lorentz symmetry

Expect violations of Lorentz symmetries (probe: distant sources of light such a gamma ray bursts) Conclusion

A new window is being opened towards the Universe using the knowledge accumulated over more than 50 years of high energy physics.

Back to where the field started, but this time not to understand the infinitely small, but to grasp the infinitely large.