DOCSLIB.ORG

Personal and Ambient Exposures to Air Toxics in Camden, New Jersey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Personal and Ambient Exposures to Air Toxics in Camden, New Jersey RESEA R C H R E P O R T HEA L TH HEA L TH Personal and Ambient Exposures to EFF E CTS EFF E CTS Air Toxics in Camden, New Jersey INSTITUTE INSTITUTE Paul J. Lioy, Zhihua (Tina) Fan, Junfeng (Jim) Zhang, 101 Federal Street, Suite 500 Panos Georgopoulos, Sheng-Wei Wang, Pamela Boston, MA 02110, USA Number 160 Ohman-Strickland, Xiangmei Wu, Xianlei Zhu, +1-617-488-2300 August 2011 Jason Herrington, Xiaogang Tang, Qingyu Meng, www.healtheffects.org Kyung Hwa Jung, Jaymin Kwon, Marta Hernandez, Linda Bonnano, Joann Held, and John Neal RESEA R CH REPO R T Number 160 August 2011 Includes a Commentary by the Institute’s Health Review Committee Personal and Ambient Exposures to Air Toxics in Camden, New Jersey Paul J. Lioy, Zhihua (Tina) Fan, Junfeng (Jim) Zhang, Panos Georgopoulos, Sheng-Wei Wang, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Xiangmei Wu, Xianlei Zhu, Jason Herrington, Xiaogang Tang, Qingyu Meng, Kyung Hwa Jung, Jaymin Kwon, Marta Hernandez, Linda Bonnano, Joann Held, and John Neal with a Commentary by the HEI Health Review Committee Research Report 160 Health Effects Institute Boston, Massachusetts Trusted Science · Cleaner Air · Better Health Publishing history: This document was posted at www.healtheffects.org in August 2011. Citation for whole document: Lioy PJ, Fan Z, Zhang J, Georgopoulos P, Wang S-W, Ohman-Strickland P, Wu X, Zhu X, Herrington J, Tang X, Meng Q, Jung KW, Kwon J, Hernandez M, Bonnano L, Held J, Neal J. 2011. Personal and Ambient Exposures to Air Toxics in Camden, New Jersey. Research Report 160. Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA. © 2011 Health Effects Institute, Boston, Mass., U.S.A. Cameographics, Belfast, Me., Compositor. Printed by Recycled Paper Printing, Boston, Mass. Library of Congress Catalog Number for the HEI Report Series: WA 754 R432. Cover paper: made with at least 55% recycled content, of which at least 30% is post-consumer waste; free of acid and elemental chlorine. Text paper: made with 100% post-consumer waste recycled content; acid free; no chlorine used in processing. The book is printed with soy-based inks and is of permanent archival quality. CONTENTS About HEI vii About This Report ix Preface xi HEI STATEMENT 1 INVESTIGATORS’ REPORT by Lioy et al. 3 ABSTRACT 3 INTRODUCTION 5 Study Objectives and Specific Aims 8 METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN 9 Subject Recruitment 10 Community Connections 10 Local Meetings and Events 10 Direct Contact with Local Residents 11 Advertisement in Local Newspapers 11 Word of Mouth 11 Survey Instrument: Questionnaires 11 Fixed Monitoring Sites 12 Fixed Monitoring Site in Waterfront South 12 Fixed Monitoring Site in Copewood–Davis 12 Measurement of Air Pollutants 12 Sampling Setup for Personal and Ambient Air Sample Collection 12 Measurement of PM2.5 14 Measurement of VOCs 14 Measurement of Aldehydes 15 Measurement of PAHs 17 Nicotine Measurement for ETS Exposure Evaluation 18 Spatial Variation Study 18 Saturation-Sampling Sites 18 Saturation-Sampling Campaigns 19 Statistical Analysis and Modeling Application 19 Data Processing and Validation 19 Statistical Analyses 19 Model Applications 21 Modeling of Ambient Air Concentrations 22 Modeling of Personal Air Concentrations 23 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 29 Demographic Information and Subject Retention 29 Sample Collection, Data Completeness, and QA–QC 29 Method Detection Limits and Method Precision 29 Personal and Ambient Concentrations and Personal–Ambient Associations 32 PM2.5 32 VOCs 45 Aldehydes 55 PAHs 60 Research Report 160 Spatial Variation Study 67 Concentrations and Spatial Distribution of BTEX and MTBE 67 Sources of MTBE and BTEX in Waterfront South and Copewood–Davis 78 Concentrations and Spatial Distribution of Chloroform and Carbon Tetrachloride 81 Concentrations and Spatial Distribution of Aldehydes 81 Sources of Aldehydes 81 Comparison Between Spatial Variation Sampling and Fixed Site Monitoring 91 MENTOR Modeling Application 92 Results of Model Application 92 Discussion of Modeling Applications and Measurement Results 109 Personal Concentrations of Air Toxics 111 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 113 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 116 REFERENCES 116 APPENDIX A. HEI Quality Assurance Statement 121 APPENDIX B. Ambient VOC Concentrations (µg/m3) in (B.1) Summer and (B.2) Winter for Waterfront South, Copewood–Davis, and NJDEP Monitoring Sites 122 APPENDICES AVAILABLE ON THE WEB 126 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 126 OTHER PUBLICATIONS RESULTING FROM THIS RESEARCH 126 ABBREVIATIONS AND OTHER TERMS 126 COMMENTARY by the Health Review Committee 129 INTRODUCTION 129 SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND 129 SIDEBAR Sources of Pollutants Evaluated 130 STUDY OBJECTIVES AND SPECIFIC AIMS 132 STUDY DESIGN 132 Characteristics of Waterfront South and Copewood–Davis 132 Participants 133 Ambient Monitoring Sites 133 Air Pollutant Sampling and Measurement 133 Spatial Saturation Sampling 134 Modeling of Pollutant Concentrations 134 Statistical Analyses 134 HEALTH REVIEW COMMITTEE EVALUATION 135 General Comments 135 Key Findings 135 Interpretation of Findings 136 CONTENTS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 142 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 143 REFERENCES 143 COMMENTARY APPENDIX 145 Related HEI Publications 153 HEI Board, Committees, and Staff 155 ABOUT HEI The Health Effects Institute is a nonprofit corporation chartered in 1980 as an independent research organization to provide high-quality, impartial, and relevant science on the effects of air pollution on health. To accomplish its mission, the institute • Identifies the highest-priority areas for health effects research; • Competitively funds and oversees research projects; • Provides intensive independent review of HEI-supported studies and related research; • Integrates HEI’s research results with those of other institutions into broader evaluations; and • Communicates the results of HEI’s research and analyses to public and private decision makers. HEI typically receives half of its core funds from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and half from the worldwide motor vehicle industry. Frequently, other public and private organizations in the United States and around the world also support major projects or research programs. HEI has funded more than 280 research projects in North America, Europe, Asia, and Latin America, the results of which have informed decisions regarding carbon monoxide, air toxics, nitrogen oxides, diesel exhaust, ozone, particulate matter, and other pollutants. These results have appeared in the peer-reviewed literature and in more than 200 comprehensive reports published by HEI. HEI’s independent Board of Directors consists of leaders in science and policy who are committed to fostering the public–private partnership that is central to the organization. The Health Research Committee solicits input from HEI sponsors and other stakeholders and works with scientific staff to develop a Five-Year Strategic Plan, select research projects for funding, and oversee their conduct. The Health Review Committee, which has no role in selecting or overseeing studies, works with staff to evaluate and interpret the results of funded studies and related research. All project results and accompanying comments by the Health Review Committee are widely disseminated through HEI’s Web site (www.healtheffects.org), printed reports, newsletters and other publications, annual conferences, and presentations to legislative bodies and public agencies. vii ABOUT THIS REPORT Research Report 160, Personal and Ambient Exposures to Air Toxics in Camden, New Jersey, presents a research project funded by the Health Effects Institute and conducted by Dr. Paul J. Lioy, of the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, New Jersey, and his colleagues. This report contains three main sections. The HEI Statement, prepared by staff at HEI, is a brief, nontechnical summary of the study and its findings; it also briefly describes the Health Review Committee’s comments on the study. The Investigators’ Report, prepared by Lioy and colleagues, describes the scientific background, aims, methods, results, and conclusions of the study. The Commentary is prepared by members of the Health Review Committee with the assistance of HEI staff; it places the study in a broader scientific context, points out its strengths and limitations, and discusses remaining uncertainties and implications of the study’s findings for public health and future research. This report has gone through HEI’s rigorous review process. When an HEI-funded study is completed, the investigators submit a draft final report presenting the background and results of the study. This draft report is first examined by outside technical reviewers and a biostatistician. The report and the reviewers’ comments are then evaluated by members of the Health Review Committee, an independent panel of distinguished scientists who have no involvement in selecting or overseeing HEI studies. During the review process, the investigators have an opportunity to exchange comments with the Review Committee and, as necessary, to revise their report. The Commentary reflects the information provided in the final version of the report. ix PREFACE HEI’s Research Program on Air Toxics Hot Spots diesel exhaust organic gases — and mandated the INTRODUCTION reduction of benzene in gasoline and of hydrocarbons Air toxics comprise a large and diverse group of air (including MSATs) in exhaust (U.S. EPA 2007). In pollutants that, with sufficient exposure, are known or 2007, HEI published a critical review of the literature suspected to cause adverse effects on human health, on exposure to and health
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NJDEP-Camden Waterfront South Air Toxics Pilot Project-Final
    CAMDEN WATERFRONT SOUTH AIR TOXICS PILOT PROJECT August 2005 Commissioner Bradley M. Campbell NJ Department of Environmental Protection CAMDEN WATERFRONT SOUTH AIR TOXICS PILOT PROJECT Final Report August 2005 Prepared by: NJ Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Quality PO Box 027 Trenton, NJ 08625 With Assistance from the NJDEP Camden Air Toxics Workgroup, NJ Dept. of Health & Senior Services, Camden County Health Dept., and the Camden Community Advisory Committee With Support from US Environmental Protection Agency, Community Assessment and Risk Reduction Initiatives Grant Project Manager: Joann Held TABLE OF CONTENTS ELECTRONIC ATTACHMENTS………………………………………………………………… 2 ACRONYMS………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………….. 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………. 7 1.1 WHY WATERFRONT SOUTH?………………………………………………… 8 1.2 ESTABLISHING A DEP WORKGROUP……………………………………….. 9 1.3 COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE…………………………………….. 9 1.4 FINDINGS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS…………………………………….… 10 2.0 METHODS AND RESULTS……………………………………………………………… 13 2.1 STEP 1: EMISSIONS INVENTORY……….……………………………………13 2.1.1 BASIC STEPS……………………………………………………………. 13 2.1.2 FACILITIES LIST……………………………………………………….. 15 2.2 STEP 2: DISPERSION MODELING……………………………………………. 17 2.2.1 BASIC STEPS…………………………………………………………… 17 2.2.2 ITERATIVE PROCESS…………………………………………………. 19 2.2.3 MODEL RESULTS……………………………………………………… 20 2.2.4 COMPARISON TO F.W. WINTER NATA PREDICTIONS…………… 20 2.2.5 SOURCES NOT MODELED……………………………………………. 21 2.3 STEP 3: RISK ASSESSMENT………………………………………………….. 23 2.3.1 BASIC STEPS…………………………………………………………….24 2.3.2 FACILITIES OF INTEREST……………………………………………. 29 2.3.3 QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT………………………………………… 38 2.4 STEP 4: AMBIENT AIR MONITORING………………………………………. 40 2.4.1 FINE PARTICULATES………………………………………………….. 40 2.4.2 BUCKET BRIGADE…………………………………………………….. 43 2.4.3 CANISTER AND OPEN-PATH SAMPLES AT CCMUA……………… 48 2.5 STEP 5: RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES…………………………………… 50 2.5.1 STATIONARY SOURCE EMISSION REDUCTIONS………………… 51 2.5.2 TRUCK EMISSION REDUCTIONS…………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Urban Odor with Field Olfactometry in Camden, NJ
    Rowan University Rowan Digital Works School of Earth & Environment Faculty Scholarship School of Earth & Environment 8-19-2019 Evaluating Urban Odor with Field Olfactometry in Camden, NJ Jennifer L. Kitson Rowan University, [email protected] Monica Leiva Zachary Christman Rowan University, [email protected] Pamela Dalton Follow this and additional works at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/see_facpub Part of the Geography Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Kitson, Jennifer ; Leiva, Monica ; Christman, Zachary ; & Dalton, Pamela. (2019). Evaluating Urban Odor with Field Olfactometry in Camden, NJ. Urban science, Vol.3 (3), p.93. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Earth & Environment at Rowan Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Earth & Environment Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Rowan Digital Works. Article Evaluating Urban Odor with Field Olfactometry in Camden, NJ Jennifer Kitson 1,*, Monica Leiva 1, Zachary Christman 1 and Pamela Dalton 2 1 Department of Geography, Planning, & Sustainability, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA 2 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-856-256-4817 Received: 1 July 2019; Accepted: 15 August 2019; Published: 18 August 2019 Abstract: Odor annoyance negatively impacts residents of communities adjacent to persistent nuisance industries. These residents, often with a high percentage of minority or otherwise marginalized residents, experience subjective and objective impacts on health and well-being; yet, reliable methods for quantifying and categorizing odors have been elusive. Field olfactometry is integral to the study of odor annoyance experienced by communities as it includes both qualitative (human perception) and quantitative (intensity measurement) dimensions of human odor experience and has been employed by municipalities in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Camden Parks and Open Space Plan 2020 Volunteers Painting a Mural at Pyne Poynt Park
    The Camden Parks and Open Space Plan 2020 Volunteers painting a mural at Pyne Poynt Park. © COURTESY OF THE CAMDEN COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT; FRONT COVER, TOP: Opening of the Cooper’s Poynt Family School Green Schoolyard. © ELYSE LEYENBERGER FOR THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND; BOTTOM: “City Invincible” art installation created by various local artists as part of the Connect the Lots initiative. © COURTESY OF COOPER’S FERRY PARTNERSHIP; BACK COVER: A young boy blows a wish on a dandelion. © HANNAH LOZANO The Camden Parks and Open Space Plan 2020 The Trust for Public Land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. Printed on 100% recycled paper. tpl.org © 2020 The Trust for Public Land ii THE CAMDEN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction to the City of Camden ............................................................................................. 5 Section 2: The Camden Parks Plan Approach ............................................................................................ 11 Section 3: Mapping Results ........................................................................................................................... 15 Section 4: Community Engagement Summary .......................................................................................... 37 Section 5: Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Camden, New Jersey Acknowledgements
    published by the Trust for Public Land A Final Report to the Ford Foundation Winter 2004 the Role of Parks and Greenspace in Redevelopment Camden, New Jersey Acknowledgements TPL staff would like to thank the staff of the Camden Children’s Garden, Tom Knoche of Camden Greenways, Inc., and Ayo Ayorinde and Dwaine Williams from the city for their hours spent on site visits and tours of the city. Their time and knowledge were most appreciated and helpful to our process. Thanks also go the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, The Reinvestment Fund, the State Department of the Environment, Hopeworks, Camden County, Camden City Bureau of Parks, and Camden County Improvement Authority for sharing data layers to help with our understanding and analysis of city and county geography. Mission Statement The Trust for Public Land conserves land for people to enjoy as parks, gardens, and other natural places, ensuring livable communities for generations to come. Photos throughout this document are by Kathy Blaha, Trust for Public Land Table of Contents Acknowledgements . .inside cover Introduction . .3 Methodology . .4 Observations and Overview . .6 Stakeholder Analysis . .6 GIS Analysis . .8 Parks Analysis . .9 Conservation Finance Analysis . .12 Local Funding Options . .12 State Funding Options . .14 Federal Funding Options . .15 Recommendations . .17 A Strategy for the Public Sector . .17 A Strategy for Private Partnerships . .20 A Clean Water Strategy . .21 A Project-Based Strategy . .23 Conclusion . .25 Appendices . .26 A. List of Interviews . .26 B. Attributes for GIS Database . .26 C-1. Playgrounds per 1000 Residents . .27 C-2. Parkland as a Percentage of City Area .
    [Show full text]
  • The Camden Parks and Open Space Plan 2020 Volunteers Painting a Mural at Pyne Poynt Park
    The Camden Parks and Open Space Plan 2020 Volunteers painting a mural at Pyne Poynt Park. © COURTESY OF THE CAMDEN COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT; FRONT COVER, TOP: Opening of the Cooper’s Poynt Family School Green Schoolyard. © ELYSE LEYENBERGER FOR THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND; BOTTOM: “City Invincible” art installation created by various local artists as part of the Connect the Lots initiative. © COURTESY OF COOPER’S FERRY PARTNERSHIP; BACK COVER: A young boy blows a wish on a dandelion. © HANNAH LOZANO The Camden Parks and Open Space Plan 2020 The Trust for Public Land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. Printed on 100% recycled paper. tpl.org © 2020 The Trust for Public Land ii THE CAMDEN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction to the City of Camden ............................................................................................. 5 Section 2: The Camden Parks Plan Approach ............................................................................................ 11 Section 3: Mapping Results ........................................................................................................................... 15 Section 4: Community Engagement Summary .......................................................................................... 37 Section 5: Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report
    HOUSING AUTHORIT Y OF THE CIT Y OF CAMDEN Celebrating Our Neighborhoods 2010 Deborah Person-Polk Chairwoman ANNUAL REPORT Maria Marquez, Ph.D. HACC Board of Commissioners Executive Director MESSAGE FROM CAMDEN MAYOR DANA L. REDD Dear Friends, Colleagues and Stakeholders: Every successful urban core has a distinctive heartbeat—a set of forces that drive its vitality and, in doing so, create a unique identity. Through the 1950’s and into the early part of the 1960’s, Camden’s heartbeat could be traced directly to large manufacturers and industry that dominated the city. Since that time, however, the city has been working to define a new identity. There is good reason to believe that this definition is coming into focus for the City of Camden. Without a doubt, at the heart of Camden’s growth is the resurgence of the City’s neighborhoods. These neighborhoods and our residents are the lifeblood of the City. Much of this resurgence is focused around the rehabilitation and redevelopment of Camden’s housing stock. Over the past ten Years, in excess of 4,000 new residential units have been constructed or rehabilitated. Along with the Camden Housing Authority and other partners, the City is reinvesting in ten target neighborhoods as a part of the NSP2 Program. The NSP2 projects in Liberty Park and Centerville have not only physically transformed those communities but have also empowered it residents. The same is happening throughout the City, in Cramer Hill (Nuevo Vida Phase 1 & 2), Parkside (Park Blvd Phase 3 & 4), Cooper Plaza and Lanning Square (Cooper Hill Housing) not to mention South Camden, Gateway, among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront South Theatre • 866.811.4111
    PRESENTS A WORLD PREMIERE PRODUCTION MAY 4 — MAY 20, 2018 Fridays & Saturdays @ 8:00p.m. • Sundays @ 2:00p.m. WATERFRONT SOUTH THEATRE www.southcamdentheatre.org • 866.811.4111 Camden’s “Off-Broadway” Theatre Company 400 Jasper Street • Michael Doyle Lane • Camden, NJ 08104 One Block West Of Broadway & Ferry Avenues PROUD TO SUPPORT THE ARTS! show this ad and save 20% off your next visit! Your guests’ first impressions of your event... modernmodern & indiantraditional food Indian & spiritscuisine professional stylish...energetic extraordinary...organized sophisticated...amazing! www.indebluerestaurant.com byobrestaurant restaurant & bar restaurant• tasting menu & bar 205619 s.collings 13th street avenue • happy205 hour s. 13th 5pm street — close philadelphia,collingswood, pa nj • saturdayphiladelphia, & sunday pa brunch 215.545.4633856.854.4633 • sitar & tabla215.545.4633 at sunday brunch b creative monthly specials • home b chef’s delivery tasting & takemenu out b outdoor dining b live sitar & tabla •b happyfull service hour & 4:30 tray - catering 6:30 pm b take-out b online ordering b live sitar & tabla b take-out EventNavigators.com b sunday brunch b home delivery b sunday brunch b home delivery TOP RATED 610.649.6330 Indian restaurant (pa & nj) UNDER THE ARTISTIC DIRECTION OF RAYMOND CROCE, SR. PRESENTS THE WORLD PREMIERE OF ARTEMISIA BY LEE KISZONAS PLACE: The studios, alleys, tavernas in Italy. TIME: 1610 A.D. There is one intermission between acts. CAST Nicole Henderson...................................................................................................Artemisia
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE INITIATIVE an Effort of the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program
    GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE INITIATIVE an effort of the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program water.rutgers.edu water.rutgers.edu WATER RESOURCES PROGRAM The Water Resources Program is one of many specialty programs under Rutgers Cooperative Extension (RCE). The goal of the RCE Water Resources Program is to provide solutions for the water quality and quantity issues that New Jersey faces today. This is accomplished through research, project development, assessment, and extension. In addition to preparing and distributing Fact Sheets, we provide educational programming in the form of lectures, seminars, and workshops as part of our outreach to citizens. With New Jersey Agriculture Experiment Station funding and other State and Federal sources, CH we conduct research and demonstration projects that EAR S E will ultimately be used by stakeholders to improve R and protect water resources in New Jersey. The Green Infrastructure Initiative Water and sewer infrastructure systems in many WATER RESOURCES PROGRAM E X communities throughout New Jersey are reaching the T t Integrating research, education, and extension Integrating research, education, and extension E end of their functional life and will need repair and N t Delivering solutions based on sound science replacement over the next decade. Opportunities S Delivering Working innovativewith various solutions members basedof the community,on sound science I t O exist to reduce costs for replacing this aging including municipalities, NGOs, and individual residents Working with communities and residents N infrastructure using new techniques and technologies, Solving water resources issues in New Jersey t better preparing the state for a sustainable future. Solving water resources issues for New Jersey Infrastructure planning and design approaches are needed that reduce demand on existing infrastructure, extend its functional life where possible, and provide cost-effective and sustainable N O I solutions that conserve and protect water resources T A C U while improving the quality of life of our citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden, Referred to by Poet Walt Whitman As “A City Invincible,1”Was Once a Major Manufacturing and Shipbuilding Hub Along the Delaware River
    C AMDEN: RISING ABOVE THE FLOODWATERS he city of Camden, referred to by poet Walt Whitman as “a city invincible,1”was once a major manufacturing and shipbuilding hub along the Delaware River. At its peak in 1950, TCamden’s population stood at 125,000. Today, Camden is the 12th largest city in New Jersey at 77,000 people. The exodus of businesses and residents has strained the municipal tax base to the point where the city has difficulty providing even basic services. Neglected water and sewer systems in the city, some of which date back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries, have exacerbated the An abandoned factory once used by regular problems of an old combined sewer and stormwater system. Silt and the RCA Corporation to make the debris are accumulating in sewer lines, reducing capacity to a fraction of what Victrola phonograph has been it was originally and causing backups and flooding across the city. An influx of redeveloped into The Victor, luxury loft apartments with ground-floor new businesses would help to generate the tax revenue necessary to maintain restaurants and retail. and upgrade these systems; however, the city faces an unfortunate catch-22 if flooding and sewer backups cause businesses to seek other locations. Despite these challenges, the city is starting to see sparks of revitalization. The downtown waterfront has been transformed into an entertainment district, featuring a minor league ballpark, aquarium, concert venue, market-rate housing and new office buildings. Local anchor institutions Rutgers-Camden, Rowan University and the Cooper University Hospital have made tremendous efforts to revitalize the areas around their campuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Waterfront South Air Toxics Pilot Project
    DRAFT 11/8/04 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) CAMDEN WATERFRONT SOUTH AIR TOXICS PILOT PROJECT QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF STRESSORS This document describes those stressors which cannot be quantified and have the potential to impact the health of the residents of Camden Waterfront South. A qualitative assessment is sometimes included in a Cumulative Risk Assessment (CRA). CRA combines the risks from relevant exposures to multiple stressors over time (EPA, 2003). These stressors can be either chemical or non-chemical. CRA is in the developmental stage. There are no prescribed precise methods for calculating cumulative risk at this time. The stressors discussed in this section have the potential to impact the entire population of Camden Waterfront South. The most vulnerable sub-populations are fetuses, infants, children, the elderly, those with pre-existing disease (especially those with cardiopulmonary disease), and those who work or exercise outdoors. I. Low Socioeconomic Status (LSES) The residents of Camden Waterfront South experience a poverty level that is more than four times the rest of the state (US, 2000), and the population is composed almost entirely of racial and ethnic minorities, many living in low- income rental units. LSES is associated with many elements that can adversely impact human health. These include inadequate or nonexistent health care; urban blight; poor health and nutritional status; low education level; pesticide exposures; the lack of information on risk from exposure to environmental contamination; and how risk-promoting lifestyles and behavior effect health (Haynes & Smedly, 1999). At the DEP community outreach meeting, residents of Camden Waterfront South have said that they feel additional stress over living in close proximity to industry and many known contaminated sites (over 25 sites have been identified in and around the census tract).
    [Show full text]
  • Cooper-Grant / Central Waterfront
    CONNECTING COMMUNITIES: A COOPER-GRANT/CENTRAL WATERFRONT NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN UPDATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to the residents, workers, business and institutional representatives, and stakeholders of the Cooper-Grant neighborhood, Downtown and the Central Waterfront area. Your invaluable insight, time and continued commitment to improve the neighborhood for all has helped make this Plan Update possible. STAKEHOLDER MEETING PARTICIPANTS INTERVIEW PARTICIPANTS Andrew Bush, Cooper Health Cynthia Primas, IDEA Center Shaneka Boucher Nick Cangelosi, The Michaels Group Katherine Puccio, EMR Nick Cangelosi Stephen Dottavi, EMR Dana Redd, CEO Rowan University/ Erin Crean Caren Fishman, Executive Director, Rutgers-Camden Board of Directors Raymond Lamboy Camden Special Services District Michael Venuto, DRPA Engineering Sgt. Dekel Levy Greg Gamble, Rutgers University Curt Voss, Live Nation Nichelle Pace Raymond Lamboy, LAEDA Steven Weinstein, Rowan University Dana Redd Barbara Lazzaro, NJ Transit Dr. Edward Williams, City of Camden Sonia Rivera Perez Government and Community Relations Department of Planning Scott Schreiber Sgt. Dekel Levy, Camden County Jennifer Young, Verizon Nyeema Watson Police Department Vince Nicoletti, Adventure Aquarium COOPER-GRANT COOPER’S FERRY PLANNING TEAM NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION PARTNERSHIP _INTERFACE STUDIO Jonathan Latko, President Joseph Myers, Vice President & COO Scott Page Bryon Yoder, Treasurer Brian Bauerle, Vice President Stacey Chen Benjamin Saracco, Volunteer Maria G. Gonzalez Rausell Jessica Franzini, Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Paulsboro Marine Terminal O Foreign Trade Zone #142 – Seven Counties the Port of Camden District
    South Jersey Port Corporation An Agency of the State of New Jersey Southern New Jersey’s International Seaports Kevin Castagnola, Executive Director & CEO Overview About SJPC Facilities USEPA Grants – Repowering DVRPC CMAQ Grant – Diesel Forklift Replacement Program Waterfront South Traffic Improvements NJDOT Signage Waterfront Amphitheater – Parking Battleship NJ Memorial & Museum Camden Maritime & Shipbuilding Museum South Jersey Port Corporation SJPC’s enabling legislation established a Port District comprised of the counties of Mercer, Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, Salem, Cumberland and Cape May and all lands and waters in the Delaware river and bay in which the agency may act in the establishment, acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, improvement, operation and maintenance of marine terminals. Mission Statement: To be in a leadership position by providing services and facilities to accommodate the transportation of goods and commodities by water and land to foster regional economic development for the benefit of our Port District and; To develop and support waterborne commerce within the Port District and to assist and support the development of business congruent with import and export services and; To invigorate and create a favorable economic climate that fosters employment and income for our residents and our state. SJPC Port District SJPC’s Port District is comprised of seven counties along the Delaware River: • Mercer • Burlington • Camden • Gloucester • Salem • Cumberland • Cape May SJPC Terminal Locations o Balzano Marine Terminal o Broadway Terminal o Salem Marine Terminal o Paulsboro Marine Terminal o Foreign Trade Zone #142 – Seven Counties The Port of Camden District Balzano Marine Terminal Ben Franklin Bridge Walt Whitman Bridge G F A C Broadway Terminal D H B E K L M I J N O Steel Cocoa Beans Wood Cement Products USEPA Program Environmental projects include installation of electric crane, diesel emission controls on yard equipment, repower crane engines with new, clean running engines through USEPA grants.
    [Show full text]