Bonaventure's Legenda Maior in the Tradition of Hagiography a DI
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Man of Perfect Virtue: Bonaventure’s Legenda Maior in the Tradition of Hagiography A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of the Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Matthew William Kozlowski Washington, DC 2020 The Man of Perfect Virtue: Bonaventure’s Legenda Maior in the Tradition of Hagiography Matthew William Kozlowski Director: Raymond Studzinski, PhD Abstract In 1263, Bonaventure of Bagnoregio submitted a new life of Francis of Assisi. The Legenda Maior Sancti Francisci (Major Legend of Saint Francis) was soon decreed as the official biography for the Franciscan order. Despite its ongoing importance to the order, the Legenda Maior came under criticism in the 20th century for its perceived lack of attention to the ‘true’ historical Francis. Paul Sabatier, for example, evaluated the earlier accounts of Francis as being far superior. More recently, scholars have come to see Bonaventure’s text as a masterpiece of spiritual and theological insight. What Sabatier seems to have overlooked is that the Legenda Maior was, and is, a hagiography. The genre of hagiography is unique in that the life of a saint is presented for the purpose of forming and edifying those who encounter it as readers (or just as commonly, listeners). This dissertation will first examine several well-known hagiographies, such as the life of St. Antony the Great. Next, early Franciscan texts such as Thomas of Celano’s Life of St. Francis will be discussed. It will be shown that all of these texts share a focus on virtue – in many cases the virtues of the saints are presented as being equally important as miracles. With this groundwork laid, the dissertation will offer an in-depth reading of Bonaventure’s Legenda Maior, focusing on virtue. It will be shown how Bonaventure presented the virtue of Francis as a manifestation of grace, tightly connected to Francis’ imitation of Christ. In this way, the Legenda Maior presents Francis as not only a great saint, but as one perfectly conformed to Christ, and the man of perfect virtue. Bonaventure’s overall theory of grace, free will, virtue, and moral progress are also discussed. The dissertation concludes with a short chapter on the stigmata. Overall, it is argued that modern readers who approach Bonaventure’s Francis today may be inspired to pursue virtue in their own lives. In this way, the Legenda Maior functions as hagiography, forming and edifying those who encounter the text. This dissertation by Matthew William Kozlowski fulfills the dissertation requirements for the doctoral degree in Theology and Religious Studies approved by Raymond Studzinski, PhD, as Director, and by Joshua Benson, PhD, and David Elliot, PhD as Readers. ________________________________________ Raymond Studzinski, PhD, Director ________________________________________ Joshua Benson, PhD, Reader ________________________________________ David Elliot, PhD, Reader ii CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Virtue in the Lives of the Saints 12 Chapter 2. The Emerging Portrait of Francis 53 Chapter 3. Bonaventure’s Francis: The Man of Perfect Virtue 98 Chapter 4. Reading the Legenda Maior as Hagiography Today 146 Conclusion. The Stigmata and Moral Progress 182 Bibliography 194 iii INTRODUCTION Between 1260 and 1263, Bonaventure of Bagnoregio completed a new life of Francis of Assisi. The Legenda Maior Sancti Francisci (Major Legend of Saint Francis) was soon decreed as the official biography for the Franciscan order. At the time, there were other vitae of Francis in circulation: works written by Thomas of Celano, Julian of Speyer, and other ‘companions’ of Francis who had known him before his death in 1226. What all of these works had in a common was a desire to present the person and life of Francis, both to the world and to the members of the order that he had founded. The term “Legend” is often confusing for English speakers, as it conjures up notions of fantasy or myth. For a 13th century audience, however, Legenda, from the Latin legere (to read), referred to the fact that the life of a saint was to be read, usually aloud at worship or during meals. As a text read aloud, the vita of a saint was, and is, more than a biography – rather, it is a hagiography. The difference between these two terms is not merely a question of terminology. While a biography ostensibly aims to report the facts of a person’s life, hagiography has a different intention, which is to shape and form those readers (or listeners) who encounter it. The unwillingness of some 20th century scholars to view the lives of the saints (hagiographies) as representing a unique genre with unique motivations has led to some unfortunate conclusions. In the case of Bonaventure’s Legenda Maior, the work has been often criticized for not being authentic to the historical Francis. Paul Sabatier and others claimed that the author offered too much of his own agenda, producing a text that had little value for 1 2 understanding the ‘real’ Francis of Assisi.1 The problem with this approach was not that it lacked appropriate historical curiosity, but rather that it asked something of hagiography that the genre never promised to deliver. As Jean Leclercq so cogently explains, “The reason for recording a saint's life is not always, as we might believe at first thought, to tell the story of his life. For what is being dealt with is the existence not of just any outstanding personality… but of a Christian who has achieved sanctity.”2 Facts do matter to the hagiographer, but only in so far as those facts relate to the broader project of edification. Indeed, the primary aim of hagiography is formation. The following dissertation approaches Bonaventure’s Legenda Maior with this understanding in mind: that the text was, and is, a work of hagiography with an intention to shape and form those who encounter it. How the text achieves that aim is the main question of the dissertation. The short answer to this question can be summed up in one word: virtue. In the tradition of Christian hagiography, the presentation of a saint’s virtue was almost always a central theme. Again, in the words of Jean Leclercq, “What matters is less the circumstances of his [the saint’s] existence than the opportunities they afforded him to practice virtue.”3 The saints, for all their extraordinary words and deeds, were also put forth as models of charity, humility, patience, fortitude, and a host of other virtues. In many cases, the presentation of these 1 Sabatier wrote, for example, that “circumstances controlled his [Bonaventure’s] work, and it is no injustice to him to say that it is fortunate for Francis, and especially for us, that we have another biography of the Poverello than that of the Seraphic Doctor.” Paul Sabatier, The Life of St. Francis of Assisi, trans. L.S. Houghton (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1919), 395. 2 Jean Leclercq, The Love of Learning and the Desire for God: A Study of Monastic Culture (New York: Fordham University Press, 1996), 161. 3 Leclercq, 161. 3 virtues was even more important than the miracles that the saints performed.4 This dissertation will therefore approach the genre of hagiography through the lens of virtue, arguing that an understanding of virtue allows for a fruitful reading of Bonaventure’s Legenda Maior in particular. What is a Virtue? The contemporary field of virtue ethics has become a well-known method of moral reasoning. Pushing back against the previous traditions of deontology (ethics based on duty), virtue ethics, broadly speaking, emphasizes the notion of ‘being’ over ‘doing.’5 This is not to say that actions do not matter, for they matter deeply. Rather, the suggestion is that actions flow out of consistent dispositions that guide behavior – these dispositions are virtues. Thus the ethical ‘task’ for the individual is to develop the character necessary to practice right action, regardless of the situation. Such an understanding of virtue is actually rooted in ancient thought. Aristotle’s definition of virtue is as follows: “virtue in a man will be the disposition (habitus) which renders him a good man and also which will cause him to perform his function well.”6 4 For example, the authors of the Legenda Trium Sociorum (Legend of the Three Companions, abbreviated as L3C) reveal a clear preference of virtue over miracles. They write, “We do not intend merely to relate miracles, which demonstrate, but do not cause sanctity. Our intention is to point out some striking aspects of his holy manner of life.” L3C Letter (Fontes, 1374; FAED II, 67): Non contenti narrare solum miracula, quae sanctitatem non faciunt sed ostendunt, sed etiam sanctae conversationis eius insignia. Latin from Fontes Franciscani, ed. Menestò, Enrico and Stefano Brufani (Assisi: Porziuncola, 1995), hereafter Fontes. English translation Francis of Assisi Early Documents, ed. Regis J. Armstrong, Wayne Hellmann, and William J. Short (New York: New City Press, 2000-2001), hereafter FAED. 5 Stanley Hauerwas, A Community of Character: Toward a Constructive Christian Social Ethic (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981), 113. 6 Nicomachean Ethics II.6. 4 Christian theologians in the medieval scholastic period, having rediscovered the works of Aristotle with access to Latin translations, crafted a theory of virtue that was similar in many ways to the Greek tradition. Both Thomas Aquinas and Bonaventure agreed, for example, that a virtue was a stable disposition (habitus) out of which a person acts well.7 Conversely, a vice is a habitus out of which one acts poorly. Key to this understanding of habitus – and this point is also crucial in contemporary virtue ethics – is that habits are shaped and formed over time.