MIL-HDBK-799(AR) 5 April 1996

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MIL-HDBK-799(AR) 5 April 1996 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com METRIC MIL-HDBK-799(AR) 5 April 1996 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS—GENERAL This handbook is for guidance only. Do not cite this document as a requirement. AMSC/NA FSC 12GP DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Thi d t t d ith F M k 4 0 4 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MIL-HDBK-799 (AR) FOREWORD 1. This handbook is approved for use by the Department of the Army and is available for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense. 2. This handbook is for guidance only. Do not cite this document as a requirement. If it is, the contractor does not have to comply. 3. This handbook was developed to provide guidance and general approaches to the develop- ment of fire control systems. In particular, the handbook has been prepared to aid the designers of Army fire control equipment and to serve as a reference guide for all military and civilian person- nel who may be interested in the design aspects of such materiel. The guidance in this handbook is based on the fundamental parameters of the fire control problem and its solution. Primary emphasis is placed on the systematic approach required in the design of present-day fire control equipment and systems. This approach involves thorough analysis of the particular fire control problem at hand, establishment of the most suitable mathematical model, and computerization and mechanization of the mathematical model. 4. This handbook was developed under the auspices of the US Army Materiel Command’s Engineering Design Handbook Program, which is under the direction of the US Army Industrial Engineering Activity. Research Triangle Institute was the prime contractor for this handbook under Contract No. DAAA09-86-D-0009. The development of this handbook was guided by a technical working group chaired by Ms. Robin Gullifer of the Fire Support Armament Center of the US Army Armament Research, Development, and Engineering Center. 5. Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data which may be of use in improving this document should be addressed to Commander, US Army Arma- ment Research, Development, and Engineering Center, ATTN: AMSTA-AR-EDE-S, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000, by using the Standardization Document Improvement Proposal (DD Form 1426) appearing at the end of this document or by letter. ii Thi d t t d ith F M k 4 0 4 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MIL-HDBK-799 (AR) CONTENTS FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................................................ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS........................................................................................................................ xiv LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................xvii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ....................................................................................xviii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS 1-1 DEFINITION AND NATURE OF FIRE CONTROL ....................................................................1-1 1-1.1 GENERAL ...............................................................................................................................1-1 1-1.2 DEFINITION AND GOALS OF FIRE CONTROL ..............................................................1-1 1-1.3 SUMMARY OF FIRE CONTROL METHODS .....................................................................1-2 1-1.3.1 Direct Fire Control ........................................................................................................1-2 1-1.3.2 Indirect Fire Control .....................................................................................................1-2 1-1.3.3 Geometry of Typical Fire Control Problem .................................................................1-3 1-1.4 CLASSIFICATION OF FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT ....................................................1-4 1-1.5 APPLICATIONS OF MODERN FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................1-4 1-1.5.1 Surface-to-Surface ..........................................................................................................1-5 1-1.5.2 Surface-to-Air ..................................................................................................................1-6 1-1.5.3 Air-to-Surface ..................................................................................................................1-6 1-1.5.4 Air-to-Air .........................................................................................................................1-7 1-1.6 THE INPUT-OUTPUT (IO) CONCEPT ................................................................................1-7 1-1.6.1 Primary Factors in Establishing Input-Output Relationships .....................................1-7 1-1.6.1.1 Factors Affecting the Projectile Path....................................................................1-7 1-1.6.1.2 Target Motion With Respect to the Weapon .....................................................1-7 1-1.6.2 Secondary Factors in Establishing Input-Output Relationships ..................................1-8 1-2 CHRONOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ARMY FIRE CONTROL ........................................1-8 1-2.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1-8 1-2.2 PRE-19TH CENTURY FIRE CONTROL ..............................................................................1-8 1-2.2.1 A Word on Nomenclature ............................................................................................1-8 1-2.2.2 Control of Weapons Prior to Firearms .........................................................................1-9 1-2.2.3 Development and Control of Early Firearms ..............................................................1-9 1-2.3 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE 19th CENTURY .......................................................................1-9 1-2.3.1 Improvements in Weapons ...........................................................................................1-9 1-2.3.2 Improvements in Fire Control ......................................................................................1-10 1-2.4 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE 20TH CENTURY THROUGH WORLD WAR II ..................1-10 1-2.4.1 Field Artillery Fire Control Equipment ........................................................................1-11 1-2.4.1.1 Instruments Used in Target Location .................................................................1-12 1-2.4.1.1.1 Binoculars ....................................................................................................1-12 1-2.4.1.1.2 Magnetic Compass ......................................................................................1-12 1-2.4.1.1.3 Maps and Plotting Boards ..........................................................................1-12 1-2.4.1.1.4 Sound and Flash Ranging ...........................................................................1-13 1-2.4.1.1.5 Aiming Circles .............................................................................................1-13 1-2.4.1.1.6 Battery Commander’s Telescope ...............................................................1-14 1-2.4.1.1.7 Optical Range Finders ................................................................................1-14 1-2.4.1.2 Ballistic and Meteorological Data ........................................................................1-15 1-2.4.1.3 Entering Elevation Data Into the Weapon .........................................................1-16 1-2.4.1.3.1 Gunner’s Quadrant .....................................................................................1-16 1-2.4.1.3.2 Elevation and Range Quadrants ................................................................1-17 1-2.4.1.4 Entering Azimuth Data Into the Weapon ...........................................................1-17 1-2.4.1.5 Fuze Setters ...........................................................................................................1-17 iii Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MIL-HDBK-799 (AR) 1-2.4.1.6 Direct Fire Optical Instruments ..........................................................................1-17 1-2.4.2 Tank Fire Control Equipment ......................................................................................1-18 1-2.4.2.1 Sighting Equipment ..............................................................................................1-18 1-2.4.2.2 Ranging Equipment .............................................................................................1-19 1-2.4.2.3 Stabilization Equipment .......................................................................................1-19 1-2.4.3 Air Defense Fire Control Equipment ...........................................................................1-19 1-2.4.3.1 Target Data ...........................................................................................................1-20 1-2.4.3.1.1 Target Angles and Rates .............................................................................1-20 1-2.4.3.1.2 Target Illumination and Sound Location ..................................................1-20 1-2.4.3.1.3 Optical Range Finder ..................................................................................1-20
Recommended publications
  • Control Theory
    Control theory S. Simrock DESY, Hamburg, Germany Abstract In engineering and mathematics, control theory deals with the behaviour of dynamical systems. The desired output of a system is called the reference. When one or more output variables of a system need to follow a certain ref- erence over time, a controller manipulates the inputs to a system to obtain the desired effect on the output of the system. Rapid advances in digital system technology have radically altered the control design options. It has become routinely practicable to design very complicated digital controllers and to carry out the extensive calculations required for their design. These advances in im- plementation and design capability can be obtained at low cost because of the widespread availability of inexpensive and powerful digital processing plat- forms and high-speed analog IO devices. 1 Introduction The emphasis of this tutorial on control theory is on the design of digital controls to achieve good dy- namic response and small errors while using signals that are sampled in time and quantized in amplitude. Both transform (classical control) and state-space (modern control) methods are described and applied to illustrative examples. The transform methods emphasized are the root-locus method of Evans and fre- quency response. The state-space methods developed are the technique of pole assignment augmented by an estimator (observer) and optimal quadratic-loss control. The optimal control problems use the steady-state constant gain solution. Other topics covered are system identification and non-linear control. System identification is a general term to describe mathematical tools and algorithms that build dynamical models from measured data.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Superb Explanatory Device': the MONIAC, an Early Hydraulic Analog Computer
    ‘A superb explanatory device’ The MONIAC, an early hydraulic analog computer Anna Corkhill Since 1953, the University of when it was rediscovered, partially rubber tubing and powered by a Melbourne has owned a rare restored and given a position in a mechanical pump. (In the prototype, machine: a hydraulic analog simple display case on level 1 of the the pump’s motor was recycled from computer capable of explaining the Economics and Commerce Building. a World War II Lancaster bomber, economy and performing complex The machine has recently been but the university’s MONIAC economic calculations. It is generally moved to the entrance of the new was commercially made.) It is known as the MONIAC (which Giblin Eunson Business, Economics approximately two metres high and stands for ‘MOnetary National and Education Library in the ICT one metre wide, with a metal backing Income Analog Computer’), Building, 111 Barry Street. enclosing the machine’s pump and though it has also been called Though a reasonably accurate connecting tubing. The machine has the ‘Financephalograph’, the computational device, the MONIAC’s three main water tanks, representing ‘National Income Monetary Flow key aim was to demonstrate taxes and government spending, Demonstrator’ and simply the Keynesian economic models in a savings and investment, and import– ‘Phillips Machine’, after its inventor, clear, visual way. As a pedagogical aid, export. The ‘active balances’ tank at Bill Phillips. The machine, one of it used coloured water to represent the bottom represents the total stock approximately 12 ever created, was money flowing through the economy, of currency and bank credit in the purchased by the Department of and showed the relationships between economy at any given time.
    [Show full text]
  • Analog Computer on a Chip – Compiling Solutions
    Analog Computer on a Chip – Compiling Solutions John Milios Nicolas Clauvelin Sendyne Corp. Sendyne Corp. New York, NY, USA New York, NY, USA [email protected] [email protected] Abstract --- The original room-sized analog computers of the sometimes if, they converge to a solution. The Columbia 1950s were programmed using paper drawings and manual cable University team, lead by Professor Yannis Tsividis, revisited the connections. The Apollo IC is the first digitally programmed analog old idea of analog computing and re-invented it using today’s computer, implemented in a 4x4 mm2 CMOS IC and capable of CMOS analog technology. The result was what we now call the solving problems with high speed and extremely low power. The Apollo IC, the first integrated, digitally programmable general high level programming language of an analog computer consists purpose analog computer (GPAC) chip [2] and associated of the differential equations describing the system to be simulated. computer board. Sendyne, through an exclusive license from The solution to each programmed model is achieved by the proper Columbia University used this technology to build the SA100, interconnection and calibration of the analog computer elements a digitally controlled analog computer that can be programmed in such a way as to implement the aforementioned differential and exchange data with a digital computer through a USB port equations. Deducing from the equations the right interconnections [3]. and implementing these in the analog computer circuitry is the role of an analog computer compiler. Such a compiler has been During the same period researchers at MIT started developed for the first time by MIT researchers for the Apollo IC investigating suitability of analog computing elements in analog computer.
    [Show full text]
  • Computing Science Technical Report No. 99 a History of Computing Research* at Bell Laboratories (1937-1975)
    Computing Science Technical Report No. 99 A History of Computing Research* at Bell Laboratories (1937-1975) Bernard D. Holbrook W. Stanley Brown 1. INTRODUCTION Basically there are two varieties of modern electrical computers, analog and digital, corresponding respectively to the much older slide rule and abacus. Analog computers deal with continuous information, such as real numbers and waveforms, while digital computers handle discrete information, such as letters and digits. An analog computer is limited to the approximate solution of mathematical problems for which a physical analog can be found, while a digital computer can carry out any precisely specified logical proce- dure on any symbolic information, and can, in principle, obtain numerical results to any desired accuracy. For these reasons, digital computers have become the focal point of modern computer science, although analog computing facilities remain of great importance, particularly for specialized applications. It is no accident that Bell Labs was deeply involved with the origins of both analog and digital com- puters, since it was fundamentally concerned with the principles and processes of electrical communication. Electrical analog computation is based on the classic technology of telephone transmission, and digital computation on that of telephone switching. Moreover, Bell Labs found itself, by the early 1930s, with a rapidly growing load of design calculations. These calculations were performed in part with slide rules and, mainly, with desk calculators. The magnitude of this load of very tedious routine computation and the necessity of carefully checking it indicated a need for new methods. The result of this need was a request in 1928 from a design department, heavily burdened with calculations on complex numbers, to the Mathe- matical Research Department for suggestions as to possible improvements in computational methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Analog Computation and Representation
    Analog Computation and Representation Corey J. Maley forthcoming in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Abstract Relative to digital computation, analog computation has been neglected in the philosophical literature. To the extent that attention has been paid to analog computation, it has been misunderstood. The received view—that analog computation has to do essentially with continuity—is simply wrong, as shown by careful attention to historical examples of discontinuous, discrete analog computers. Instead of the received view, I develop an account of analog computation in terms of a particular type of analog representation that allows for discontinuity. This account thus characterizes all types of analog computation, whether continuous or discrete. Furthermore, the structure of this account can be generalized to other types of computation: analog computation essentially involves analog representation, whereas digital computation essentially involves digital representation. Besides being a necessary component of a complete philosophical understanding of computation in general, understanding analog computation is important for computational explanation in contemporary neuroscience and cognitive science. Those damn digital computers! Vannevar Bush, MIT 1 Introduction 2 Analog Computers 2.1 Mechanical analog computers 2.2 Electronic analog computers 2.3 Discontinuous analog elements 3 What makes analog computation ‘analog’ and ‘computational’ 3.1 Analog as continuity 3.2 Analog as covariation 3.3 What makes it ‘analog’ 3.4 What makes it ‘computation’ 4 Questions and Objections 4.1 Aren’t these just hybrid computers? 4.2 Is this really even computation? 4.3 The Lewis-Maley account is problematic 5 Concluding thoughts 1 Introduction Like clocks and audio recordings, computation comes in both digital and analog varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer History a Look Back Contents
    Computer History A look back Contents 1 Computer 1 1.1 Etymology ................................................. 1 1.2 History ................................................... 1 1.2.1 Pre-twentieth century ....................................... 1 1.2.2 First general-purpose computing device ............................. 3 1.2.3 Later analog computers ...................................... 3 1.2.4 Digital computer development .................................. 4 1.2.5 Mobile computers become dominant ............................... 7 1.3 Programs ................................................. 7 1.3.1 Stored program architecture ................................... 8 1.3.2 Machine code ........................................... 8 1.3.3 Programming language ...................................... 9 1.3.4 Fourth Generation Languages ................................... 9 1.3.5 Program design .......................................... 9 1.3.6 Bugs ................................................ 9 1.4 Components ................................................ 10 1.4.1 Control unit ............................................ 10 1.4.2 Central processing unit (CPU) .................................. 11 1.4.3 Arithmetic logic unit (ALU) ................................... 11 1.4.4 Memory .............................................. 11 1.4.5 Input/output (I/O) ......................................... 12 1.4.6 Multitasking ............................................ 12 1.4.7 Multiprocessing .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Types of Computers Contents
    1. Types of Computers Contents 1 Classes of computers 1 1.1 Classes by size ............................................. 1 1.1.1 Microcomputers (personal computers) ............................ 1 1.1.2 Minicomputers (midrange computers) ............................ 1 1.1.3 Mainframe computers ..................................... 1 1.1.4 Supercomputers ........................................ 1 1.2 Classes by function .......................................... 2 1.2.1 Servers ............................................ 2 1.2.2 Workstations ......................................... 2 1.2.3 Information appliances .................................... 2 1.2.4 Embedded computers ..................................... 2 1.3 See also ................................................ 2 1.4 References .............................................. 2 1.5 External links ............................................. 2 2 List of computer size categories 3 2.1 Supercomputers ............................................ 3 2.2 Mainframe computers ........................................ 3 2.3 Minicomputers ............................................ 3 2.4 Microcomputers ........................................... 3 2.5 Mobile computers ........................................... 3 2.6 Others ................................................. 4 2.7 Distinctive marks ........................................... 4 2.8 Categories ............................................... 4 2.9 See also ................................................ 4 2.10 References
    [Show full text]
  • Computers and Hydraulics
    I ? ::) t!E PAP 2C·6 HYDRAULICS BRANCH OFFICIAL FILE COPY tltEN BORROWli"_,D RETURN PROMPTiY COMPUTERS AND HYDRAULICS by Phillip "F." Enger Paper to be presented at ASCE Environmental Engineering Conference, Kansas City, Mo., October 18-22, 1965 ABSTRACT Experiences of a hydraulic laboratory in using computers for simple and complex hydraulic problems showed that direct application of computers to everyday problems in a small engineering office is practical and easily es­ tablished with reasonable effort. After about 30 hrs tTaining in a mathe­ matically oriented programing language, most engineers were able to program their own work for electronic digital computers, making programs for small routine problems practical. Most programs were small, but compared to manual methods, time was saved with each, adding up to a significant saving in man-days. This freed engineers for professional tasks, and more work was undertaken than would have been otherwise. Suggestions for computer applicat~on in small offices include: /(1) Use formal teaching methods to instruct engineers in a mathematically oriented programing language; (2) encourage engineers to write in a simple manner their own programs for small problems; (3) obtain the services of professional programers where large generalized problems are involved; (4) make the computer readily available to the staff; (5) obtain the cooperation of a large part of the staff./ Engineers trained in programing will attack complex problems pre­ viously impractical because of excessive arithmetical operations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of IT
    IT Computer Technical Support Newsletter A Brief History of IT May 23, 2016 Vol.2, No.29 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................1 Pre-mechanical..................2 Mechanical.........................3 Electro-mechanical............4 Electronic...........................5 Age of Information.............6 Since the dawn of modern computers, the rapid digitization and growth in the amount of data created, shared, and consumed has transformed society greatly. In a world that is interconnected, change happens at a startling pace. Have you ever wondered how this connected world of ours got connected in the first place? The IT Computer Technical Support 1 Newsletter is complements of Pejman Kamkarian nformation technology has been around for a long, long time. Basically as Ilong as people have been around! Humans have always been quick to adapt technologies for better and faster communication. There are 4 main ages that divide up the history of information technology but only the latest age (electronic) and some of the electromechanical age really affects us today. 1. Pre-Mechanical The earliest age of technology. It can be defined as the time between 3000 B.C. and 1450 A.D. When humans first started communicating, they would try to use language to make simple pictures – petroglyphs to tell a story, map their terrain, or keep accounts such as how many animals one owned, etc. Petroglyph in Utah This trend continued with the advent of formal language and better media such as rags, papyrus, and eventually paper. The first ever calculator – the abacus was invented in this period after the development of numbering systems. 2 | IT Computer Technical Support Newsletter 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Mathematical Limitations of the General-Purpose Analog Computer LEE A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector ADVANCES IN APPLIED MATHEhfA’ITCS 9,22-34 (1988) Some Mathematical Limitations of the General-Purpose Analog Computer LEE A. RUBEL Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1409 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801 DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF MARK KAc We prove that the Dirichlet problem on the disc cannot be solved by the general-purpose analog computer, by constructing, on the boundary, a function u,, that does satisfy an algebraic differential equation, but whose Poisson integral u satisfies no algebraic differential equation on some line segment inside the disc. 0 1988 Academic Press, Inc. INTRODUCTION The general-purpose analog computer (GPAC) is the mathematical ab- straction of several actual computing machines, of which the Bush differen- tial analyzer (see [KAK]) may be taken as the prototype. Although the differential analyzer and its successors were excellent machines for solving ordinary differential equations (ODES), they were not good at solving partial differential equations (PDEs). They attempted to do it by solving a large number of ODES one after the other, like scanning a square by a large number of horizontal lines, but this did not yield good results, either in the time taken or in the accuracy of the results. We discuss in this paper some of the theoretical limitations of the abstract GPAC as opposed to the practical limitations of actual machines. Our chief example will be the Dirichlet problem for the disc. We explicitly produce a function U&e”) that can be generated by a GPAC, such that if u(z)( = u(x, y) = u(re”)) is the solution of Laplace’s equation i3 2u/Jx2 + 6’ 2u/ay2 = 0 for ]z ] < 1 with boundary values U(Z) = u,,(ele) for (z] = 1, z = el’, then there does not exist any GPAC that produces u on a certain line segment inside the disc.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Theory 1 Laboratory 2
    CONTROL THEORY 1 LABORATORY 2 Introduction to: Analog Computers and the DSPACE System. Mark Schedule 33% Preparation 67% Lab Report Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Objective . 2 1.2 Hardware Description . 2 2 USING THE COMDYNA GP-6 ANALOG COMPUTER 2 2.1 Analog Computer Elements . 2 2.2 Operation of the Analog Computer . 6 2.3 Example 1 . 6 2.4 Example 2 . 7 3 USING THE dSPACE SYSTEM 9 3.1 Creating a dSPACE Block Diagram . 12 3.2 The ControlDesk Package . 13 3.3 Using dSPACE to find a Step Response . 17 4 Laboratory Preparation 20 5 Laboratory Procedure 20 5.1 Analog Computer . 20 5.2 dSPACE . 21 5.3 dSPACE and the Analog Computer . 21 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objective The objective of this laboratory is for students to become familiar with the use of the GP6 analog computer and the dSPACE system in implementing given transfer functions. This knowledge will form the basis of later laboratories in which these systems are used to implement controllers or simulate control systems. 1.2 Hardware Description The hardware used in this laboratory experiment consists of the following: Comdyna GP-6 Analog Computer • Signal Generator • oscilloscope • IBM PC running Matlab and dSPACE software. This PC also contains a dSPACE DSP board. • 2 USING THE COMDYNA GP-6 ANALOG COMPUTER One approach to implementing a given transfer function involves using various elements contained in the Comdyna GP-6 analog computer. 2.1 Analog Computer Elements (i) Integrators: The symbol for integrators together with their patch panel layout is shown below:(Note Amplifiers 1{4 must
    [Show full text]
  • Analog Computer - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 10-3-13 下午3:11
    Analog computer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 10-3-13 下午3:11 Analog computer From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia An analog computer (spelled analogue in British English) is a form of computer that uses the continuously-changeable aspects of physical phenomena such as electrical,[1] mechanical, or hydraulic quantities to model the problem being solved. In contrast, digital computers represent varying quantities incrementally, as their numerical values change. Mechanical analog computers were very important in gun fire control in World War II and the Korean War; they were made in significant numbers. In particular, development of transistors made electronic analog computers practical, and before digital computers had developed sufficiently, they were commonly used in science and industry. Analog computers can have a very wide range of complexity. Slide rules and nomographs are the simplest, while naval gun fire control computers and large hybrid digital/analogue computers were among A page from the Bombardier's the most complicated. Digital computers have a certain minimum Information File (BIF) that describes (and relatively great) degree of complexity that is far greater than the components and controls of the that of the simpler analog computers. This complexity is required to Norden bombsight. The Norden execute their stored programs, and in many instances for creating bombsight was a highly sophisticated optical/mechanical output that is directly suited to human use. analog computer used by the United States Army Air Force during World Setting up an analog computer required scale factors to be chosen, War II, the Korean War, and the along with initial conditions – that is, starting values.
    [Show full text]