DOCSLIB.ORG

Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2012 STARK COUNTY Multi-Jurisdictional All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2012 Some of the information contained in this document is considered sensitive under Ohio Law. The information contained in this docu- ment is For Official Use Only (FOUO). Stark County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................... i 1.1 Documentation of the Planning Process............................................................. 1 1.2 Description of the Planning Area......................................................................... 8 1.3 Record of Changes.............................................................................................. 19 2.0 RISK ASSESSMENT 2.1 Identifying Hazards.............................................................................................. 23 2.2 Profiling Hazards................................................................................................. 32 2.3 Inventory Asset.................................................................................................... 36 2.4 Estimate Losses.................................................................................................. 57 2.5 Analyzing Development Trends........................................................................... 59 3.0 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS 3.0 Local Hazard Mitigation Goals............................................................................. 62 4.0 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions.................................................. 90 4.2 Implementation of Mitigation Actions................................................................... 137 5.0 PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCESS 5.0 Plan Maintenance Process.................................................................................. 152 6.0 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Hazard Profiles, Loss Calculations, Mapping Appendix 2: Calculation Methodologies Appendix 3: Glossary Appendix 4: Evidence of Public Involvement Appendix 5: Adopting Resolutions Table of Contents Stark County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Municipal Hazard Comparisons............................................................... 30 Figure 2.2: Probability vs. Severity Chart.................................................................. 32 Figure 2.3: Risk Assessment Decision Matrix........................................................... 35 Figure 2.4: Stark County Population Trends............................................................. 60 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Hazards Concern Table............................................................................ 5 Table 1.2: Record of Changes Table………………................................................... 19 Table 2.1: Hazard Identification Table....................................................................... 25 Table 2.2: Probability & Severity Values.................................................................... 33 Table 2.3: Hazard Probability Classifications............................................................ 34 Table 2.4: Hazard Severity Classifications................................................................ 34 Table 2.5: Stark County Asset Inventory………………………………………………. 38 Table 2.6 Summary of Estimated Losses................................................................ 58 Table 2.7: Residential Construction......................................................................... 60 Table 4.1: Stark County Project Prioritization........................................................... 138 Table 4.2: Alliance Project Prioritization................................................................... 142 Table 4.3: Canal Fulton Project Prioritization.................................................................142 Table 4.4: Canton Project Prioritization.................................................................... 142 Table 4.5: Louisville Project Prioritization................................................................. 143 Table 4.6: Massillon Project Prioritization................................................................. 143 Table 4.7: North Canton Project Prioritization..............................................................143. Table 4.8: Beach City Project Prioritization............................................................... 143 Table 4.9: Brewster Project Prioritization.......................................................................144 Table 4.10: East Canton Project Prioritization.......................................................... 144 Table 4.11: East Sparta Project Prioritization........................................................... 144 Table 4.12: Hartville Project Prioritization................................................................. 144 Table 4.13: Hills & Dales Project Prioritization......................................................... 145 Table 4.14: Limaville Project Prioritization................................................................ 145 Table 4.15: Magnolia Project Prioritization............................................................... 145 Table 4.16: Meyers Lake Project Prioritization......................................................... 145 Table 4.17: Minerva Project Prioritization................................................................. 146 Table of Contents Stark County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Table 4.18: Navarre Project Prioritization................................................................. 146 Table 4.19: Waynesburg Project Prioritization.......................................................... 146 Table 4.20: Wilmot Project Prioritization................................................................... 146 Table 4.21: Bethlehem Township Project Prioritization............................................ 147 Table 4.22: Canton Township Project Prioritization.................................................. 147 Table 4.23: Jackson Township Project Prioritization................................................ 147 Table 4.24: Lake Township Project Prioritization..................................................... 147 Table 4.25: Lawrence Township Project Prioritization.............................................. 148 Table 4.26: Lexington Township Project Prioritization.............................................. 148 Table 4.27: Marlboro Township Project Prioritization............................................... 148 Table 4.28: Nimishillen Township Project Prioritization............................................ 148 Table 4.29: Osnaburg Township Project Prioritization............................................. 149 Table 4.30: Paris Township Project Prioritization..................................................... 149 Table 4.31: Perry Township Project Prioritization..................................................... 149 Table 4.32: Pike Township Project Prioritization...................................................... 149 Table 4.33:Plain Township Project Prioritization...................................................... 150 Table 4.34: Sandy Township Project Prioritization................................................... 150 Table 4.35: Sugar Creek Township Project Prioritization......................................... 150 Table 4.36: Tuscarawas Township Project Prioritization.......................................... 150 Table 4.37: Washington Township Project Prioritization........................................... 151 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS Stark County Hazard Mitigation Plan Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION This multi-jurisdictional all-hazard mitigation plan has been completed in accordance with Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as enacted by Section 104 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. The guidelines for the completion of this plan appear in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) under Title 44: Emergency Services, Part 201.6. The Ohio Emergency Management Agency (OEMA) further monitored both the original and update planning processes. Funding for the original project was distributed by OEMA under the Pre- Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program. Two (2) types of funding facilitated the first update: the Hazard Risk Assessment (HRA) was funded by US Department of Homeland Security (USDHS) funds through the OEMA while the Action Plan (AP) was funded locally. The Stark County Emergency Management Agency (EMA) acted as the lead agency for the completion of this plan at the local level. The EMA contracted both the HRA and AP out. The original HRA was completed in early 2005; the updated HRA was completed in January of 2012. The original AP was completed in late 2005; the updated AP was completed in January, 2012. The plan was formally adopted by participating jurisdictions late in 2005. The first revision was adopted in 2012. The Stark County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan is considered “multijurisdictional” for several reasons. In addition to the county governing body of Stark County, all 19 municipal jurisdictions participated in the data compilation and AP development. The municipal jurisdictions provided representatives on the Hazard Mitigation Core Planning Committee (HMC) and contributed at least one (1) project to the AP. Further, all 19 governmental entities in Stark County formally adopted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FLOOD of AUGUST 1935 Dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER Z < 5
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 869 FLOOD OF AUGUST 1935 dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER o O z < 5 BY i ;> ^, C. V. YOUNGQUIST AND W. B. WITH SECTIONS ON THE ASSOCIATES METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOOT ^ ;j . » BY * V WALDO E. SMITH AND A. K. SHOWALTEK 2. Prepared in cooperation with the * ^* FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRAflCg^ OF PUBLIC WORKS ' -o j; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 jFor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. G. - * * « Price 40 cents (paper) CONTENTS Pag« Abstract---.--_-_-__-__-___--______.-__-_---_---_-__-_--_-__-.-_._ I Introduction.______________________________________________________ 1 Administration and personnel---_______--_-_____-__--____________-__ 3 Acknowledgments ________-________-----_--__--__-_________________ 3 Geography _ ____________________________________________________ 6 Topography, drainage, and transportation________________________ 6 Rainfall...--_---.-__-------.-_--------__..---_-----------_---- 7 Population, industry, and mineral resources_---_-__--_________--__ 8 Flood control-___-_-___-__-_-__-____-_--_-_-__--_--__.____--_- S General features of the flood-_______________________________________ 9 Damage.-__-_______--____-__--__--__-_-____--_______-____--__ IT Meteorologic and hydrologic conditions, by Waldo E. Smith____________ 19 General features of the storm.___-____-__________---_____--__--_ 19 Records of precipitation._______________________________________ 21 Antecedent
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Sandy Creek Watershed, 2010
    Biological and Water Quality Study of the Sandy Creek Watershed, 2010 Carroll, Columbiana, Stark and Tuscarawas Counties OHIO EPA Technical Report EAS/2013-01-01 Division of Surface Water May 17, 2013 December 2012 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Sandy Creek Watershed 2010 Carroll, Columbiana, Stark and Tuscarawas Counties OEPA Technical Report EAS/2013-01-01 May 17, 2013 Prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Ecological Assessment Section 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Northeast District Office 2110 East Aurora Road Twinsburg, Ohio 44087 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 John R. Kasich, Governor Scott J. Nally, Director State of Ohio Ohio Environmental Protection Agency EAS/2013-01-01 Sandy Creek Watershed 2010 May 17, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 3 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 12 IMPROVEMENTS TO WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................................. 13 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • 3745-1-24 Muskingum River Drainage Basin
    3745-1-24 Muskingum river drainage basin. (A) The water bodies listed in table 24-1 of this rule are ordered from downstream to upstream. Tributaries of a water body are indented. The aquatic life habitat, water supply and recreation use designations are defined in rule 3745-1-07 of the Administrative Code. The state resource water use designation is defined in rule 3745-1-05 of the Administrative Code. The most stringent criteria associated with any one of the use designations assigned to a water body will apply to that water body. (B) Figure 1 of the appendix to this rule is a generalized map of the Muskingum river drainage basin. A generalized map of Ohio outlining the twenty-three major drainage basins and listing associated rule numbers in this chapter is in figure 1 of the appendix to rule 3745-1-08 of the Administrative Code. (C) RM, as used in this rule, stands for river mile and refers to the method used by the Ohio environmental protection agency to identify locations along a water body. Mileage is defined as the lineal distance from the downstream terminus (i.e., mouth) and moving in an upstream direction. (D) The following symbols are used throughout this rule: * Designated use based on the 1978 water quality standards. + Designated use based on the results of a biological field assessment performed by the Ohio environmental protection agency. o Designated use based on justification other than the results of a biological field assessment performed by the Ohio environmental protection agency. L An L in the warmwater habitat column signifies that the water body segment is designated limited warmwater habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Nimishillen Creek Watershed
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Nimishillen Creek Watershed Middle Branch Nimishillen Creek upstream of Reifsynder Park October 28, 2009 Final Report Ted Strickland, Governor Chris Korleski, Director Nimishillen Creek Watershed TMDLs Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements vii Executive Summary viii 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Waterbody Overview 2 2.1 Description of Study Area 2 2.2 Water Quality Assessment 5 2.3 Causes and Sources of Impairment 23 3.0 Problem Statement 31 3.1 Target Identification 31 3.2 Identification of Current Deviation from Target 36 3.3 Source Identification 39 4.0 TMDL Development 40 4.1 Impairments Addressed through this TMDL 40 4.2 Methods of TMDL Development 44 4.2.1 Nutrient/DO Modeling – QUAL2K 45 4.2.2 Habitat Alteration and Sediment Method 54 4.2.3 Pathogens 55 4.3 Critical Condition and Seasonality 60 4.3.1 Nutrients / Dissolved Oxygen 60 4.3.2 Habitat and Sediment 60 4.3.3 Pathogens 60 4.4 Margin of Safety 61 4.4.1 Nutrients 61 4.4.2 Habitat and Sediment 61 4.4.3 Pathogens 61 4.5 Future Growth 61 5.0 Watershed Analysis, Loading Capacity, and Allocations 62 5.1 Nutrient/Dissolved Oxygen TMDL 62 5.2 Bacteria (Pathogen) TMDL 71 5.3 Habitat and Sediment TMDLs 75 i Nimishillen Creek Watershed TMDLs 6.0 Public Participation 81 7.0 Water Quality Improvement Strategy 82 7.1 Implementation Approach and Rationale 83 7.1.1 Pathogens 83 7.1.2 Habitat 85 7.1.3 Nutrient and Sediment 98 7.1.4 Summary 101 7.2 Reasonable Assurances 101 7.2.1 Ohio EPA 102
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Academy of Science Geology Section Field Trip
    OHIO ACADEMY OF SCIENCE GEOLOGY SECTION FIELD TRIP SELECTED GEOLOGIC HIGHLIGHTS WITHIN THE CENTRAL STARK COUNTY AREA APRIL 1, 2001 BY: Jim Bauder BAUDER CERTIFIED EARTH SCIENCES INC. 6106 Armistice Avenue N.W. can_ton, Ohio 44718 FAX 330-499-1127 330-499-1688 2001 FIELD TRIP GEOLOGY SECTION OHIO ACADEMY OF SCIENCE ROAD LOG (Miles) 0.0 Start at McDondalds restaurant at the Carnation Mall, roughly 2.0 miles west of the State Street entrance to Mount Union College. Turn left onto State Street, and proceed westward 1.0 Cross a bridge then turn right on to McCallum Avenue. The re-advance of the Hiram glaciation moved up this valley and deposited the silty clay & clayey till further upstream from this point, but not on the highland surrounding this location. 1.5 Till plain consists of Lavery basal till capped with meltout till. The less clayey melt out till has enabled the development of the Canfield-Ravenna and the Wadsworth-Rittman soil associations. 2.9 Cross Beeson Street 3.1 Shaley bedrock outcrops in these drainage ways. 3.3 Rather extensive terrace deposits of thin loamy outwash over clayey (Hiram Re-advance) till 4.1 Turn left (west) onto Edison Street, terrace position at base upland with Lavery till fairly shallow over shaley bedrock. Proceed westward within Mahoning River Basin. 8.3 Cross into Nimishillen Creek (Muskingum River) Drainage basin. 8.4 This slope descends to the west and is the western face of a till plain compred of up to 12 feet of melt-out till over basal Lavery till.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Flood of 1913 and Beyond
    The Great Flood of 1913 and Beyond 2013 Annual Report of Operations MWCD Mission Statement Responsible stewards dedicated to providing the benefits of flood reduction, conservation and recreation in the Muskingum River Watershed. Table of Contents History .........................................................................................................................................6-7 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 9 Section 1 – Organizational Review ............................................................................................... 11 Conservancy Court ................................................................................................................... 13 Board of Directors ............................................................................................................... 14-15 Board of Appraisers .................................................................................................................. 16 Development Advisory Committee ............................................................................................. 17 Personnel ................................................................................................................................. 17 Administrators Lead General Course of MWCD .................................................................... 18-19 MWCD Adopts Master Plan for Recreational Facilities ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE OHIO DIVIS!ON Geolnbiglil SU?.VEY DIV. OF
    THE OHIO DIVIS!ON GEOlnBIGlil SU?.VEY f3>oo k 117 3 cf STATE OF OHIO HANK J. LAUSCHE. 6oftrnor I DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. MARION, Director DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN H. MELVIN, Chief .. 1 Report of Investigations No. 12 ILLINOIAN AND WISCONSIN DRIFT OF THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE GRAND RIVER LOBE IN EASTERN OHIO BY G:zo:acm W. Wmn REMOVED FROM ODNR DIV. OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LIBRARY Reprinted from BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 112. PP. 807-1178 2 Fuaa •• 1 PL. SEPTEMBER 111111 BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 62. PP. 967-978 2 FIBS., 1 PL. SEPTEMBER 1861 ILLINOIAN AND WISCONSIN DRIFT OF THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE GRAND RIVER LOBE IN EASTERN OHIO BY GEORGE W. WmTE ABSTRACT Glacial drifts of Wisconsin and Illinoian age occur in the southern part of the Grand River lobe in eastern Ohio. The Illinoian, which occupies a belt only 2 to 5 miles wide, extends eastward from Canton across Stark and Columbiana counties. This is mainly till, now discontinuous and thin. Oxidation reaches a depth of 12 , feet or more, and leaching 11 feet or more. Small areas of Illinoian kames and kame terraces remain. In the Wisconsin till, which covers the area north of the Illinoian, oxidation reaches depths of 8 to 11 feet, and leaching 5 to 7 feet. A partially discontinuous end moraine lies 1 to 2 miles inside the southern limit of this drift, and a very strong end moraine lies along the west side of the lobe.
    [Show full text]
  • Stark County Technical Support Data Notebook
    STARK COUNTY, OHIO TECHNICAL SUPPORT DATA NOTEBOOK U.S. Route 30 and Interstate 77 interchange over West Branch Nimishillen Creek in Canton, Ohio. SUBMITTED BY: U.S. Geological Survey Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Water Science Center Page 1 of 121 GENERAL DOCUMENTATION 4 BACKGROUND 4 SPECIAL PROBLEM REPORT 8 ENGINEERING ANALYSES 10 HYDROLOGIC ANALYSES 10 REGRESSION ESTIMATES 10 HYDRAULIC ANALYSES 16 SPECIAL HYDRAULIC CONSIDERATIONS 16 A. BROAD-MONTER CREEK 18 B. CHATHAM DITCH 21 C. EAST BRANCH NIMISHILLEN CREEK 24 D. FAIRHOPE DITCH 27 E. FIRESTONE DITCH 30 F. HAYDEN DITCH 33 G. MIDDLE BRANCH NIMISHILLEN CREEK 36 H. MIDDLE BRANCH NIMISHILLEN CREEK TRIBUTARY NUMBER 1 39 I. NIMISHILLEN CREEK 42 J. REEMSNYDER DITCH 45 K. SHERRICK RUN 48 L. UNNAMED STREAM 51 M. WEST BRANCH NIMISHILLEN CREEK 54 N. ZIMBER DITCH 57 KEY TO CROSS-SECTION LABELING 60 A. BROAD-MONTER CREEK 60 B. CHATHAM DITCH 63 C. EAST BRANCH NIMISHILLEN CREEK 64 D. FAIRHOPE DITCH 69 E. FIRESTONE DITCH 72 F. HAYDEN DITCH 74 G. MIDDLE BRANCH NIMISHILLEN CREEK 75 H. MIDDLE BRANCH NIMISHILLEN CREEK TRIBUTARY NUMBER 1 80 I. NIMISHILLEN CREEK 81 J. REEMSNYDER DITCH 86 K. SHERRICK RUN 87 L. UNNAMED STREAM 90 M. WEST BRANCH NIMISHILLEN CREEK 92 N. ZIMBER DITCH 97 N’. ZIMBER DITCH OVERFLOW 100 MAPPING INFORMATION 101 BASE MAP DELINEATION SUMMARY 101 SURVEYS CONDUCTED BY THE USGS 101 ACCURACY OF MAPPING DATA 103 MISCELLANEOUS REFERENCES 104 Page 2 of 121 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 104 ELEVATION REFERENCE MARKS 106 Page 3 of 121 GENERAL DOCUMENTATION BACKGROUND Nimishillen Creek and its tributaries have a history of flooding areas of Stark County, Ohio1.
    [Show full text]
  • II. Watershed Inventory
    FINAL REPORT - January 26, 2007 II. Watershed Inventory Introduction The intent of the Nimishillen Creek Action Plan is to protect and/or restore the water quality of the Nimishillen Creek Mainstem and its associated tributaries by developing a Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) following endorsement guidelines established by the State of Ohio. This watershed inventory provides information needed to address water quality issues, like data on water resource, geology, socioeconomic factors, land usage, and cultural resources. Each section in the inventory was completed using the most up to date information available. Watershed Information and Map The Nimishillen Creek is located primarily in Stark County in Northeast Ohio. The watershed’s unique Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) number is 05040001 050. It is further divided into six 14-digit HUC subwatersheds which are listed in Table II-1 Table II-1: 14-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) Subwatershed in the Nimishillen Creek Watershed Subwatershed HUC Number Size (acres) Middle Branch 05040001 050 010 16,135 Middle Branch 05040001 050 020 16,733 East Branch 05040001 050 030 29,722 West Branch 05040001 050 040 29,801 Mainstem 05040001 050 050 14,683 Mainstem 05040001 050 060 13,134 For this report, the two Middle Branch watersheds (HUCs 05040001 050 010 and 05040001 050 020) were combined into one subwatershed for the Middle Branch. This is the Nimishillen Creek Watershed 3 shown in Figure I-1. Similarly, the two Mainstem watershed (HUCs 05040001 050 050 and 05040001 050 060) were divided into three watershed labeled Watershed 1, 5, and 6 in Figure I-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Brush Creek
    County Stream Group Revised: 12-12-2013 Adams Beasley Fork (Ohio Brush Creek) 1 Adams Cedar Fork (Scioto Brush Creek) 1 Adams Cherry Fork 1 Adams Crooked Creek (Ohio Brush Creek) 1 Adams East Fork Eagle Creek (Eagle Creek) 1 Adams Lick Fork (Ohio Brush Creek) 1 Adams Middle Branch (Mill Creek) 1 Adams Middle Fork (Ohio Brush Creek) 1 Adams Ohio Brush Creek 1 Adams Ohio River 4 Adams Rogers Run 1 Adams Scioto Brush Creek 2 Adams South Fork Scioto Brush Creek 2 Adams West Fork Ohio Brush Creek 1 Allen Auglaize River 1 Allen Buck Run 1 Allen Camp Creek 1 Allen Hog Creek 1 Allen Jennings Creek 1 Allen Little Hog Creek 1 Allen Miami-Erie Canal 1 Allen Ottawa River 1 Allen Riley Creek 1 Ashland Black Fork Mohican River 1 Ashland Buck Creek 1 Ashland Clear Fork Mohican River 1 Ashland Jamison Creek 1 Ashland Jerome Fork 1 Ashland Mohican River 1 Ashland Muddy Fork Mohican River 1 Ashland Vermilion River 1 Ashland West Fork (East Branch Black River) 1 Ashtabula Ashtabula River 1 Ashtabula Coffee Creek 1 Ashtabula Conneaut Creek 1 Ashtabula Cowles Creek 1 Ashtabula Grand River 2 Ashtabula Lake Erie 1 Ashtabula Mill Creek 1 Ashtabula Phelps Creek 1 Ashtabula Pymatuning Creek 2 Ashtabula Rock Creek 1 Ashtabula West Branch Ashtabula River 1 Athens East Branch Shade River 1 Athens Federal Creek 1 Athens Hocking River 1 Athens Long Run 1 Athens Margaret Creek 1 Athens McDougall Branch 1 Athens Middle Branch Shade River 1 Athens Mud Fork 1 Athens Ohio River 4 Athens Sharps Fork 1 Athens Strouds Run 1 Athens Sugar Creek 1 Athens Sunday Creek 1 Auglaize Auglaize River 1 Auglaize Clear Creek 1 Auglaize Koop Creek (aka Kopp Creek) 1 Auglaize Miami-Erie Canal 1 Auglaize St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Ohio Streams
    A Guide to Ohio Streams Edited by Randall E. Sanders, ODNR, Division of Wildlife Information and Graphic Design, Ronald J. Zimmerman, Information Design Group Published by Streams Committee, Ohio Chapter of the American Fisheries Society in Partnership with Ohio Environmental Education Fund Ohio Department of Natural Resources Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Columbus, Ohio 2001 © 2000 Information Design Group for OCAFS. 09.15.00 Title LT © 2000 Information Design Group for OCAFS. 09.15.00 Title RT A guide to Ohio Streams Table of Contents and guide to what, where, and how to find things in this book. Chapter and Section Number This book is divided into 10 chapters and 1.0 Streams 6.0 Wildlife Diversity Chapter Section chapter sections. 1.1 Natural and Human Changes 6.1 Aquatic Insects All information This number pertaining to a identifies the 1.2 Principal Streams 6.2 Mollusks chapter section chapter and and Watersheds 6.3 Stream Fishes will be contained section you are in the white area in. It also serves 1.3 Uses, Benefits, and Values 6.4 Reptiles and Amphibians Section Heading of the page. as a double page 1.4 Stream Trivia number. 2.0 Geology and Geography 7.0 Recreation 2.1 Bedrock, Ground Water, 7.1 Gone Fishin’ Section and Glacial Deposits 7.2 More Sport Fishes Introduction 2.2 Climate and Water Cycle 7.3 Recreational Opportunities 2.3 Precipitation 2.4 Relief and Land Use 3.0 Habitat Quality and Threats 8.0 Stream Laws 3.1 Quality and Size 8.1 U.S.
    [Show full text]