Serratus Anterior Muscle Fatigue Effects on Scapular Kinematics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SERRATUS ANTERIOR MUSCLE FATIGUE EFFECTS ON SCAPULAR KINEMATICS A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Oren Costantini, B.S.M.E. Graduate Program in Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering The Ohio State University 2011 Master’s Examination Committee: Dr. John H. Bolte, Advisor Dr. John D. Borstad c Copyright by Oren Costantini 2011 Abstract Background : Shoulder pain accounts for an average of 8.6 million physician visits each year in the United States. Subacromial Impingement syndrome is the most common diagnosis of shoulder pain, accounting for 44% to 65% of all complaints of shoulder pain during a physician’s office visits. Methods: A protocol to bias fatigue the Serratus Ante- rior was used in conjunction with an electromagnetic motion capture system to track the 3D motion of the scapula and the electromyography signal of 4 muscles bilaterally in 17 subjects. The skin based motion sensors tracked humeral elevation and scapular upward rotation, internal rotation, and tilting relative to the thorax in 2 planes of elevation. The skin based electromyography sensors recorded signal from pectoralis major, serratus an- terior, and upper and lower trapezius. Subjects performed 2 fatigue tasks and 3 sets of 2 kinematic tasks. Analysis: Scapular orientations relative to the thorax and electromyog- raphy signals for 3 fatigue conditions (Pre, Mid, Post) were analyzed in 10◦ increments for humeral elevations of 30◦ to 120◦ in the scapular plane and 30◦ to 110◦ in flexion. Electromyography signals were also analyzed while subjects held the two isometric fa- tigue tasks. All data were analyzed with repeated measure analysis of variance. Results: Non-dominant arms showed consistent increases in internal rotation, decreases in upward rotation, and increases in anterior tilting of the scapula relative to the thorax in flexion and the scapular plane as fatigue progressed. Dominant arms had a wider variety of motions, showing both increases and decreases in all scapular rotations. Indications of progressive ii muscle fatigue were found qualitatively from the first fatigue task; however, the quantitative data was inconclusive. A state of global shoulder fatigue was reached following the second fatigue task. Individual muscle contributions to motion were inconclusive. Conclusions : Non-dominant arms, when fatigue, show consistent kinematic alterations similar to those found in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Dominant arms show a variety of kinematic alterations, some of which similar to patients with subacromial impingement syndrome, suggesting compensation strategies are learned. If this is true, rehabilitation can affect these compensation strategies and, possibly, return patients to more healthy motions. Further studies are needed to validate the fatigue task and protocol. iii To my friends and loved ones. You have helped to keep my dreams alive. iv Acknowledgments This research would not have been possible without the mentoring of my advisors, the loving support of my parents, and the help of my friends. First, I want to thank my advisors, Dr. John Borstad and Dr. John Bolte. Thank you for allowing me the freedom to make this project truly my own. Dr. Borstad, thank you for your hours of mentoring, your patience, and for teaching me how to be a bio-mechanist. Next, I want to thank my parents for supporting me through this process and allowing me to develop my interests in orthopedics, musculature, and biomechanics. Truly, I do not know if I would have had the ability to do this without you. Finally, I want to thank all of my friends. Our conversations on a myriad of topics helped me to learn more about the world as well as myself. Our discussions and experiences together were as much a part of graduate school for me as the classes and my research. To my friends outside of graduate school, thank you for bearing with my long absences and keeping in touch. I cannot thank you enough for your continued support. Special thanks go to: Amitabh Dashottar, your advice and help were vital to this project. Your friendship, in and out of the lab, kept me sane even when I thought things might have fallen apart. Bruce Noskowiak, your help and friendship were invaluable. Anytime I needed tech- nical help or advice you were there for me, and our conversations always lifted my spirits. Thank you. v Vita January 10, 1987 . Born - Cincinnati, Ohio June 2005 . B.S. Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Mechanical Engineering vi Table of Contents Page Abstract . ii Dedication . iv Acknowledgments . v Vita ........................................... vi List of Tables . x List of Figures . xiii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations . xv 1. Introduction . 1 1.1 Background and Significance . 1 1.1.1 Rotator Cuff Pathology in the General Population . 1 1.1.2 Cost of Rotator Cuff Treatment . 2 1.1.3 Rotator Cuff Etiology . 2 1.1.4 Subacromial Impingement Syndrome and the Anatomy of the Subacromial Space . 3 1.1.5 Pathogenesis of Subacromial Impingement . 5 1.1.6 Scapular Dyskinesis . 6 1.2 The Scapula . 6 1.2.1 Normal and Altered Scapular Motions . 8 1.2.2 Rotations of the Scapula . 9 1.2.3 Reduction and Compression of the Subacromial Space . 10 1.3 Muscles of the Shoulder Girdle . 11 1.3.1 Muscular Control of the Shoulder Girdle . 16 vii 1.3.2 Muscle Fatigue . 17 1.3.3 Serratus Anterior and Trapezius: Force Couples of Scapular Sta- bility . 18 1.3.4 Reasons For Examining Serratus Anterior . 19 1.4 Hypotheses . 21 1.4.1 Hypothesis 1: . 21 1.4.2 Hypothesis 2: . 22 2. Methods . 23 2.1 Subjects . 23 2.1.1 Sample Size Calculations . 23 2.1.2 Subject Recruitment . 23 2.2 Instrumentation and Equipment . 24 2.3 Procedure . 25 2.3.1 Setup . 25 2.3.2 Subject Preparation . 26 2.3.3 Testing . 33 2.4 Data Reduction and Processing . 37 2.4.1 MVC Task . 37 2.4.2 Kinematic Tasks . 37 2.4.3 Fatigue Tasks . 38 2.5 Data Analysis . 39 2.5.1 Verification of Data . 39 2.5.2 Analysis . 40 3. Results . 44 3.1 Hypothesis 1: Alterations in scapular muscle fatigue will be inconsistent between the dominant and non-dominant arms of subjects. This will result in differing kinematic and fatigue profiles between the dominant and non-dominant arms of subjects . 44 3.1.1 Hypothesis 1.1: Kinematic alteration of the scapula, relative to the thorax, will vary across fatigue conditions between the dom- inant and non-dominant arm as the arms are elevated in flexion and the scapular plane. 44 3.1.2 Hypothesis 1.2: Patterns of normalized EMG activation levels for the dominant and non-dominant arms will be different and vary across condition, phase of motion, and humeral elevation. 45 3.1.3 Hypothesis 1.3: Median power frequency (MPF) of EMG acti- vation levels for the dominant and non-dominant arms will differ across conditions. 47 viii 3.2 Hypothesis 2: Serratus anterior fatigue will lead to a decrease in scapular upward rotation, posterior tilting, and scapular internal rotation . 48 3.2.1 Hypothesis 2.1: Scapular upward rotation, internal rotation, and posterior tilting will decrease progressively across fatigue con- ditions . 48 3.2.2 Hypothesis 2.2: Normalized EMG activation levels of the serra- tus anterior muscle will rise between fatigue conditions at a great rate than those of the upper and lower trapezius muscles . 62 3.2.3 Hypothesis 2.3: Median power frequency of EMG activation levels of the serratus anterior muscle will have a higher per- cent decline across fatigue conditions than those of the upper and lower trapezius muscles . 63 4. Discussion . 73 4.1 Primary Kinematic Findings . 73 4.1.1 Hypothesis: 1.1 . 74 4.1.2 Hypothesis: 2.1 . 75 4.2 Primary Fatigue Findings . 77 4.2.1 Hypothesis: 1.2 . 77 4.2.2 Hypothesis: 1.3 . 78 4.2.3 Hypothesis: 2.2 . 79 4.2.4 Hypothesis: 2.3 . 80 4.3 JASA Findings . 81 4.4 Limitations and Future Work . 83 4.4.1 Subjects . 83 4.4.2 Instrumentation . 83 4.5 Conclusions . 87 Appendices 89 A. Bi-Lateral Kinematic & EMG Testing Protocol Version 1.3 . 89 Bibliography . 100 ix List of Tables Table Page 1.1 Upward/Downward Rotators & Stabilizers of The Scapula . 12 1.2 Extrinsic Dynamic Stabilizers . 13 1.3 Intrinsic Dynamic Stabilizers . 14 2.1 Subject Demographics . 24 3.1 Subject Demographics: Borg Scores . 44 3.2 Summary of Arm Dominance P-Values . 45 3.3 Summary of P-Values for Normalized EMG During Lifting Task . 46 3.4 Summary of % Change for Normalized EMG During Lifting Task by Side 47 3.5 Summary of P-Values for Normalized EMG During Waving Task . 47 3.6 Summary of Humeral Elevation Differences for Normalized EMG During Waving Task . 48 3.7 EMG Amplitude: Summary of Arm Dominance P-Values . 48 3.8 EMG MPF: Summary of Arm Dominance P-Values . 49 3.9 EMG MPF: Summary of Arm Dominance Mean Percent Change . 49 3.10 General P-Values of Condition . 50 3.11 Comparison of Mean IR Change: Non-Dominant . 50 x 3.12 Comparison of Mean IR Change: Dominant . 52 3.13 Comparison of Mean UR Change: Non-Dominant . 53 3.14 Comparison of Mean UR Change: Dominant . 53 3.15 Comparison of Mean Tilt Change: Non-Dominant . 55 3.16 Comparison of Mean Tilt Change: Dominant . 55 3.17 Summary of Wave Task Results . 56 3.18 General P-Values of Condition . 56 3.19.