Holliday Junction-Containing DNA Structures Persist in Cells Lacking Sgs1 Or Top3 Following Exposure to DNA Damage
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Holliday junction-containing DNA structures persist in cells lacking Sgs1 or Top3 following exposure to DNA damage Hocine W. Mankouria,b,1, Thomas M. Ashtona,1, and Ian D. Hicksona,b,2 aWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom; and bNordea Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark Edited* by Stephen C. Kowalczykowski, University of California, Davis, CA, and approved February 14, 2011 (received for review September 22, 2010) The Sgs1–Rmi1–Top3 “dissolvasome” is required for the mainte- HRR is a conserved cellular process that allows cells to copy nance of genome stability and has been implicated in the process- genetic information from a homologous sequence, and is re- ing of various types of DNA structures arising during DNA re- quired for the efficient repair of DNA breaks and ssDNA gaps plication. Previous investigations have revealed that unprocessed that can arise during S-phase due to DNA damage, discon- (X-shaped) homologous recombination repair (HRR) intermediates tinuities in DNA replication, or the impediment of replication persist when S-phase is perturbed by using methyl methanesulfo- fork (RF) progression. Evidence that BLM functions in HRR is nate (MMS) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells with impaired Sgs1 suggested by the fact that BS cells demonstrate elevated levels of or Top3. However, the precise nature of these persistent DNA struc- mitotic recombination, sister chromatid exchanges, and genome instability (1). Furthermore, BLM (either alone or in conjunction tures remains poorly characterized. Here, we report that ectopic α expression of either of two heterologous and structurally unrelated with hTOPOIII , hRMI1, and hRMI2) can resolve different types Escherichia coli of HRR intermediates in vitro, such as D-loops and single or Holliday junction (HJ) resolvases, RusA or human – GEN11-527, promotes the removal of these X-structures in vivo. double Holliday junctions (HJs; refs. 6, 7, and 16 21). Mutation of SGS1 or the Schizosaccharomyces pombe ortholog of BLM/SGS1, Moreover, other types of DNA replication intermediates, including + called rqh1 , also causes genome instability, hyperrecombination, GENETICS stalled replication forks and non-HRR-dependent X-structures, are and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents (8, 22–25), and Sgs1, like refractory to RusA or GEN11-527, demonstrating specificity of these BLM, is able to unwind HJs in vitro (26). Furthermore, un- HJ resolvases for MMS-induced X-structures in vivo. These data processed HRR intermediates (X-structures) have been directly suggest that the X-structures persisting in cells with impaired observed in methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)-treated sgs1, top3, Sgs1 or Top3 contain HJs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Sgs1 and rmi1 mutants using 2D gel electrophoresis (27–30). Because directly promotes X-structure removal, because the persistent many of the deleterious phenotypes of sgs1 or rqh1 mutants can be fi structures arising in Sgs1-de cient strains are eliminated when suppressed by the mutation of genes involved in the early steps of Sgs1 is reactivated in vivo. We propose that HJ resolvases and HRR (e.g., RAD51 in S. cerevisiae and rhp51+ in S. pombe; refs. Sgs1–Top3–Rmi1 comprise two independent processes to deal with 31–35), it is likely that these phenotypes are, at least in part, due to HJ-containing DNA intermediates arising during HRR in S-phase. unregulated or incomplete HRR. Although X-shaped HRR structures have been detected by DNA repair | RecQ | helicase | topoisomerase using 2D DNA gel electrophoresis in S. cerevisiae cells with im- paired Sgs1, Top3, or Rmi1 (27–30), it is presently unknown he RecQ family of DNA helicases is required for the main- whether different types of DNA structures arise in cells deficient Ttenance of genome stability in all organisms. Mutations in at in these different proteins. Because abolition of Sgs1 activity (or least three (of five) human RecQ helicases is associated with an just its helicase activity) can suppress the poor growth pheno- increased predisposition to the development of cancer and/or types of top3 or rmi1 mutants (8, 13, 14, 36), it has been proposed premature aging (1). Mutations in BLM cause Bloom’s syndrome that Sgs1 may create a DNA intermediate that is toxic in cells (BS), which is associated with increased cancer predisposition, lacking Top3 or Rmi1. One proposal is that the convergent whereas mutations in WRN or RECQ4 cause distinct disorders branch migration of double HJs (dHJs) by Sgs1 creates a hemi- (Werner’s syndrome and Rothmund–Thomson syndrome, re- catenane structure that can only be resolved by Top3 (in con- spectively) characterized by premature aging and some de- junction with Rmi1), in a process known as “dHJ dissolution” velopmental abnormalities. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, there is (18, 20, 21). However, in vivo evidence for this process is lacking, only one RecQ helicase, called Sgs1. As a consequence, this because the 2D gel methodology cannot definitively distinguish organism has proved particularly useful for genetic analyses, as between different types of joint DNA molecules such as HJs and well as for characterization of the defects arising in cells lacking hemicatenanes. RecQ helicases (2). The X-structures arising in MMS-treated sgs1 mutants have “ ” Sgs1 is thought to be the ortholog of BLM, based on a number been proposed to be pseudo-HJs, consisting of a region of of observations. First, BLM is the only human RecQ helicase hemicatenated nascent DNA and concomitant single-stranded that shares the same structural domain architecture as Sgs1. regions of parental DNA (27). This conclusion was based on the Second, both BLM and Sgs1 associate with conserved interacting in vitro characterization of X-structures, including their ability to partners that are apparently unique for BLM in human cells. More specifically, BLM exists in a complex with a type IA topoisom- erase, hTOPOIIIα, and two oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide- Author contributions: H.W.M. and I.D.H. designed research; H.W.M. and T.M.A. per- binding (OB)-fold containing proteins, hRMI1 and hRMI2 (3– formed research; H.W.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; H.W.M., T.M.A., and 7); Sgs1 associates with the yeast orthologs of these proteins, I.D.H. and analyzed data; and H.W.M. wrote the paper. Top3 and Rmi1 (8–14). Together, these proteins likely act co- The authors declare no conflict of interest. operatively as a “dissolvasome” that processes multiple kinds of *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor. DNA structures arising during DNA replication, repair, recom- 1H.W.M. and T.M.A. contributed equally to this work. bination, and mitosis (15). 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. One cellular process in which BLM and Sgs1 have both been This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. strongly implicated is homologous recombination repair (HRR). 1073/pnas.1014240108/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1014240108 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on October 2, 2021 branch migrate (even in the presence of Mg2+, which generally medium containing MMS or HU at 30 °C for 1 h. Cultures were inhibits HJ migration), their apparent resistance to the RuvC HJ then incubated at 37 °C for a further 6 h to promote robust HJ resolvase, and their partial sensitivity to ssDNA nucleases (27). resolvase activity. Genomic DNA was extracted by using the MMS also causes increased interhomolog X-structures in sgs1 hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method to re- diploid cells (37), although the precise nature of these in- strain branch migration of joint (X-shaped) molecules (42). Af- terchromosomal joint DNA molecules remains to be determined. ter 7-h exposure to 0.033% MMS, all DNA replication inter- Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that interchromosomal mediates had disappeared from ARS305 in WT cells expressing dHJs arise during double-strand break (DSB) repair in mitotic GFP, consistent with the completion of DNA replication at this diploid cells (38). Furthermore, the turnover of these structures region of the genome by this stage. In sgs1 mutants expressing was altered in sgs1 mutants, consistent with a possible role for Sgs1 GFP, bubbles and Y arcs had also disappeared, but, consistent in the prevention and/or direct processing of HJs in vivo (38). In- with previous findings (27, 28, 30), persistent X-structures at ter-sister chromatid X-structures were also identified as inter- ARS305 were observed (Fig. 1B). Previous analyses have iden- mediates of DSB repair in this study, although whether these tified these structures to be Rad51-dependent HRR inter- contained HJs or not could not be determined. Therefore, despite mediates (27). Interestingly, these MMS-induced X-structures several independent studies demonstrating the existence of un- were not detectable in sgs1 cells expressing RusA and GEN11-527 processed X-shaped DNA structures in sgs1 mutants under a (Fig. 1B). All strains examined exhibited similar mid-S-phase number of different experimental conditions, it remains unknown FACS profiles (Fig. S1), suggesting that the observed differences whether these comprise a common type of DNA structure or not. on 2D gels were not attributable to any differences in cell cycle Indeed, the precise nature and abundance of the X-structures progression or MMS-induced checkpoint arrest. We conclude could vary depending on the context (e.g., in DSB repair vs. the that expression of RusA and GEN11-527 leads to a marked re- repair of replication-associated lesions). Consistent with this pro- duction in the level of unprocessed HRR intermediates in MMS- posal, RecQ helicases can process a variety of different DNA treated sgs1 cells. structures in addition to HJs in vitro, and the BLM–hTOPOIIIα– hRMI1–hRMI2 and Sgs1–Top3–Rmi1 complexes probably act as Stalled RFs and Non-HRR-Dependent X-Structures Are Refractory to DNA structure-specific “dissolvasomes” in vivo (15).