DOCSLIB.ORG

Mutual Evaluation Report of Iceland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mutual Evaluation Report of Iceland Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures financing counter-terrorist and laundering Anti-money Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures Iceland Mutual Evaluation Report Iceland April 2018 The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an independent inter-governmental body that develops and promotes policies to protect the global financial system against money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The FATF Recommendations are recognised as the global anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) standard. For more information about the FATF, please visit the website: www.fatf-gafi.org This document and/or any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. This assessment was adopted by the FATF at its February 2018 Plenary meeting. Citing reference: FATF (2018), Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures - Iceland, Fourth Round Mutual Evaluation Report, FATF, Paris http://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/mutualevaluations/documents/mer-iceland-2018.html © 2018 FATF. All rights reserved. No reproduction or translation of this publication may be made without prior written permission. Applications for such permission, for all or part of this publication, should be made to the FATF Secretariat, 2 rue André Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France (fax: +33 1 44 30 61 37 or e-mail: [email protected]). Table of contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Risks and General Situation ................................................................................................................. 5 Overall Level of Effectiveness and Technical Compliance ................................................................. 5 Priority Actions .................................................................................................................................... 9 Effectiveness & Technical Compliance Ratings ................................................................................ 11 Mutual Evaluation Report .................................................................................................................. 13 CHAPTER 1. ML/TF RISKS AND CONTEXT ........................................................................... 15 ML/TF Risks and Scoping of Higher-Risk Issues ............................................................................. 16 Materiality .......................................................................................................................................... 20 Structural Elements ............................................................................................................................ 21 Background and other Contextual Factors ......................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 2. NATIONAL AML/CFT POLICIES AND CO-ORDINATION .......................... 33 Key Findings and Recommended Actions ......................................................................................... 33 Immediate Outcome 1 (Risk, Policy and Co-ordination) .................................................................. 34 CHAPTER 3. LEGAL SYSTEM AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES ............................................. 41 Key Findings and Recommended Actions ......................................................................................... 41 Immediate Outcome 6 (Financial intelligence ML/TF) ..................................................................... 44 Immediate Outcome 7 (ML investigation and prosecution) .............................................................. 50 Immediate Outcome 8 (Confiscation) ................................................................................................ 60 CHAPTER 4. TERRORIST FINANCING AND FINANCING OF PROLIFERATION ......... 67 Key Findings and Recommended Actions ......................................................................................... 67 Immediate Outcome 9 (TF investigation and prosecution) ............................................................... 69 Immediate Outcome 10 (TF preventive measures and financial sanctions) ...................................... 72 Immediate Outcome 11 (PF financial sanctions) ............................................................................... 75 CHAPTER 5. PREVENTIVE MEASURES .................................................................................. 79 Key Findings and Recommended Actions ......................................................................................... 79 Immediate Outcome 4 (Preventive Measures) ................................................................................... 80 CHAPTER 6. SUPERVISION ........................................................................................................ 91 Key Findings and Recommended Actions ......................................................................................... 91 Immediate Outcome 3 (Supervision) ................................................................................................. 93 CHAPTER 7. LEGAL PERSONS AND ARRANGEMENTS ................................................... 107 Key Findings and Recommended Actions ....................................................................................... 107 Immediate Outcome 5 (Legal Persons and Arrangements) ............................................................. 108 Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures in Iceland – 2018 2 │ CHAPTER 8. INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION .............................................................. 113 Key Findings and Recommended Actions ....................................................................................... 113 Immediate Outcome 2 (International Co-operation) ........................................................................ 114 TECHNICAL COMPLIANCE ANNEX- ........................................................................................ 121 Recommendation 1 – Assessing risks and applying a risk-based approach .................................... 121 Recommendation 2 – National co-operation and co-ordination ...................................................... 123 Recommendation 3 - Money laundering offence ............................................................................. 123 Recommendation 4 – Confiscation and provisional measures ........................................................ 125 Recommendation 5 – Terrorist financing offence ........................................................................... 126 Recommendation 6 – Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing ..... 128 Recommendation 7 – Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation .................................... 131 Recommendation 8 – Non-profit organisations ............................................................................... 132 Recommendation 9 – Financial institution secrecy laws ................................................................. 135 Recommendation 10 – Customer Due Diligence ............................................................................. 137 Recommendation 11 – Record-keeping ........................................................................................... 142 Recommendation 12 – Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) ............................................................. 143 Recommendation 13 – Correspondent Banking .............................................................................. 144 Recommendation 14 – Money or value transfer services (MVTS) ................................................. 145 Recommendation 15 – New technologies ........................................................................................ 146 Recommendation 16 – Wire transfers .............................................................................................. 147 Recommendation 17 – Reliance on third parties ............................................................................. 150 Recommendation 18 – Internal controls, foreign branches and subsidiaries ................................... 151 Recommendation 19 – Higher risk countries ................................................................................... 152 Recommendation 20 – Reporting of suspicious transactions .......................................................... 153 Recommendation 21 – Tipping-off and confidentiality ................................................................... 154 Recommendation 22 – DNFBPs: Customer Due Diligence ............................................................ 155 Recommendation 23 –DNFBPs: Other measures ............................................................................ 157 Recommendation 24 – Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons ........................... 158 Recommendation 25 – Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements .................. 163 Recommendation 26 – Regulation and supervision of financial institutions ..................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crime Fiction
    └ Index CRIME FICTION Please note that a fund for the promotion of Icelandic literature operates under the auspices of the Icelandic Ministry Forlagid of Education and Culture and subsidizes translations of literature. Rights For further information please write to: Icelandic Literature Center Hverfisgata 54 | 101 Reykjavik Agency Iceland Phone +354 552 8500 [email protected] | www.islit.is crime fiction · 1 · CRIME FICTION crime fiction UA MATTHIASDOTTIR [email protected] VALGERDUR BENEDIKTSDOTTIR [email protected] · 3 · CRIME FICTION crime Arnaldur Indridason Arni Thorarinsson fiction Oskar Hrafn Thorvaldsson Ottar M. Nordfjord Solveig Palsdottir Stella Blomkvist Viktor A. Ingolfsson rights-agency · 3 · └ Index CRIME FICTION ARNALDUR INDRIDASON (b.1961) has the rare distinction of having won the Nordic Crime Novel Prize two years running. He is also the winner of the highly respected and world famous CWA Gold Dagger Award for the top crime novel of the year in the English language, Silence of the Grave. Indridason’s novels have sold over ten million copies worldwide, in 40 languages. Oblivion Kamp Knox, crime novel, 2014 On the Reykjanes peninsula in 1979, a body is “One of the most compelling found floating in a lagoon created by a geother- detectives anyone has mal power station. The deceased seems to be linked with the nearby American military base, written anywhere.” but authorities there have little interest in work- CRIME TIME, UK ing with the Icelandic police. While Erlendur and Marion Briem pursue their leads, Erlendur has his mind on something else as well: a young girl Sold to: who disappeared without a trace around one of UK/Australia/New Zealand/South Africa (Random House/Harvill Secker); USA/Philippines Reykjavik’s most notorious neighbourhoods, a (St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ríkislögreglustjórinn Almannavarnadeild
    RÍKISLÖGREGLUSTJÓRINN ALMANNAVARNADEILD Applies to: Media, Department of Civil Protection and Emergency, Management, administration and Chief Epidemiologist STATUS REPORT Date: 06.03.2020 Time: 17:30 Location: Coordination center /Directorate of Health /Chief Epidemiologist Emergency/Distress Phase: COVID-19 Event description Today 6 individuals have been diagnosed with COVID-19. The pathway of infection is being traced. 43 cases have been confirmed in Iceland of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19. All are in isolation. The first cases of community transmission within Iceland were diagnosed today. All are in relatively good health. They were infected after being exposed to persons coming from Italy and Austria. As a result, The National Commissioner of the Icelandic Police and Chief Epidemiologist has raised the alert level of the response to the COVID-19 virus outbreak. This emergency activation has no significant impact on the public beyond those measures that have been taken already. However, it allows for response agencies and critical service providers to increase their preparedness activities (aprox. 150-200 institutions). For the time being, no travel restrictions are in force. There is no ban on mass gatherings. Such a ban would have a great impact on society and is therefore not activated as a result. The Chief Epidemiologist and his staff are paying special attention to vulnerable groups, particularly the elderly and those with underlying medical conditions. This group should take special care and avoid crowed places and events. Health care institutions and the organization of welfare companies are increasing their defenses and readiness. deCode genetics (Íslensk erfðagreining) has offered to do screenings for the COVID-19 in Icelandic society to check its pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Icelandic Police and the Justice System a Short Introduction
    The Icelandic Police and the Justice System A short introduction The National Commissioner of Police The Office of the National Commissioner of Police at Skúlagata 21, Reykjavík Published by: The National Commissioner of the Icelandic Police Skúlagata 21, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland Telephone: +354 570 2500 Fax: +354 570 2501 Website: www.rls.is and www.logreglan.is E-mail: [email protected] Editor: Guðmundur Guðjónsson, Chief Superintendent Photos: Foto.is sf, Júlíus Sigurjónsson and Júlíus Óli Einarsson Cover photo: Police keeping the peace at a sports game (Foto.is sf. Júlíus Sigurjónsson) Bicentenary logo: Anna Þóra Árnadóttir, Nonni og Manni/Ydda Design: Júlíus Óli Einarsson and Svansprent ehf Printed by: Svansprent ehf Publication date: September 2005 Iceland: The Country and the Nation Iceland is a volcanic island situated in the northwest part of Europe, just below the Arctic Circle. The island is volcanic and is 103,000 square kilometres. Most built-up areas are scattered around the coastline which is 4,970 km long. On 31 December 2004 the number of inhabitants was 293.577. The population is not evenly distributed and about 180,000 persons reside in Reykjavík, the capital, and the neighbouring communities. An evening view from the Barðaströnd coast in Western Iceland. Icelanders are of Scandinavian, Irish and Scottish origin. The first people known to have visited Iceland were Irish monks or hermits, but they left with the arrival of the pagan Norsemen who settled in Iceland in the period 870-930 AD. The Icelandic language dates back to Ancient Norse. Executive power lies with the President of the Republic and the Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Icelandic Foreign Affairs 2018
    MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS ICELANDIC FOREIGN AFFAIRS 2018 Excerpt from the report by the Minister for Foreign Affairs to Parliament 2018 International cooperation: Economics, trade, defence, and politics OSCE Andorra Bosnia and Kazakhstan Monaco San Marino Ukraine Armenia Herzegovina Kyrgizstan Mongolia Serbia Uzbekistan Azerbaijan Georgia Macedonia Montenegro Tajikistan Belarus Holy See Moldova Russia Turkmenistan SCHENGEN EEA EFTA EU Liechtenstein EUROZONE OECD Australia Chile Switzerland Sweden Austria Cyprus Israel Finland Ireland Japan Malta Mexico NATO New Zealand South Korea Belgium Lithuania Canada Czech Estonia Luxembourg United Iceland Republic States France Netherlands Norway Denmark Turkey Germany Portugal Hungary Greece Slovakia Poland Italy Slovenia Latvia Spain United Kingdom Bulgaria Albania Croatia Romania Published by: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, 2018 / Photos: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Reykjavík Museum of Photography, OSCE, UN Photo Library, NATO, Council of Europe, WTO, Wikimedia Commons, Norden.org 100 YEARS OF SOVEREIGNTY IN ICELAND 1918 - 2018 100 Years Sovereignty in Iceland / Nordic Council flag / Embassy shield of the Kingdom of Iceland, used until 1944 / Minister for Foreign Affairs with António Guterres, SG of the UN From Home Rule to Sustainable Development Goals This year we are commemo- the EEA Agreement to make an impact on new EEA rules rating the centenary of and to communicate Iceland’s views early in the process. Iceland becoming a free Significant effort is needed in this area. and sovereign nation with the passage of the Danish– I have often, both verbally and in writing, drawn attention Icelandic Act of Union to the fact that Icelanders must adapt its working methods in 1918. It was then that to changes in global trade patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Transnational Annual Report of the Secretary General on Police-Related Activities 2020 The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe is The World’s Largest Regional Security Organization working to ensure peace, democracy and stability for more than a billion people between Vancouver and Vladivostok. This report is submitted in accordance with Decision 9, paragraph 6, of the Bucharest Ministerial Council Meeting, 4 December 2001. © OSCE 2021 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction be accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE as the source. OSCE Secretariat Transnational Threats Department Strategic Police Matters Unit Wallnerstrasse 6 1010 Vienna, Austria E-mail: [email protected] http://www.osce.org/secretariat/policing http://polis.osce.org Table of Contents Foreword by the Secretary General 2 1. Executive Summary 5 2. Activities of the Transnational Threats Department 13 2.1 TNTD/Co-ordination Cell 14 2.2 TNTD/Strategic Police Matters Unit 16 2.3 TNTD/Action against Terrorism Unit 26 2.4 TNTD/Border Security and Management Unit 30 3. Police-Related Activities of Other Thematic Units 35 3.1 Programme for Gender Issues 36 3.2 Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings (OSR/CTHB) 38 4. Police-Related Activities of Field Operations 43 SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE 44 4.1 Presence in Albania 44 4.2 Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina 51 4.3 Mission in Kosovo
    [Show full text]
  • List of N.SIS II Offices and the National Sirene Bureaux (2017/C 228/02)
    C 228/166 EN Official Journal of the European Union 14.7.2017 List of N.SIS II Offices and the national Sirene Bureaux (2017/C 228/02) In accordance with common Articles 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council dated 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (1) (SIS II Regulation) and of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA dated 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (2) (SIS II Decision) each Member State shall designate an authority which shall have the central responsibility for its N.SIS II (the N.SIS II Office) and another authority which shall ensure the exchange of supplementary information. The Member States shall inform the Management Authority of their N.SIS II office and their Sirene Bureau which will publish the list in the Official Journal of the European Union. The present consolidated list is based on information communicated by Member States by 31 March 2017. BELGIUM SIS II Bureau NS-SIS II Police fédérale — Direction de l’information et des moyens ICT (DRI) NS-SIS Bureau Federale Politie — Directie van de informatie en de ICT middelen (DRI) NS-SIS II Office Federal Police — Information and ICT directorate (DRI) Rue Royale, 202A — Koningstraat, 202A 1000 Bruxelles/Brussels Email: cgot/[email protected] SIRENE Commission Sirene Police fédérale — Direction de la coopération policière internationale (CGI) Sirene Commissie Federale Politie — Directie van de internationale politiesamenwerking Sirene Bureau Federal Police — International police cooperation directorate (CGI) Avenue de la Couronne, 145A — Kroonlaan, 145A 1050 Bruxelles/Brussel BULGARIA SIS II Министерство на вътрешните работи Ministry of Interior 29 Shesti Septemvri Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland 2019 Crime & Safety Report
    Iceland 2019 Crime & Safety Report This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik, Iceland. The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Iceland at Level 1, indicating travelers should exercise normal precautions. Overall Crime and Safety Situation The U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik does not assume responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the persons or firms appearing in this report. The American Citizens’ Services unit (ACS) cannot recommend a particular individual or location, and assumes no responsibility for the quality of service provided. Review OSAC’s Iceland-specific page for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password. Crime Threats There is minimal risk from crime in Reykjavik. Based on information from the Icelandic National Police, local news sources, and previous reporting, crime continues to be lower than in most developed countries and countries of similar size and demographics. The low level of general crime and very low level of violent crime due to the high-standard of living, lack of tension between social and economic classes, small population, strong social attitudes against criminality, high level of trust in law enforcement, and a well-trained, highly-educated police force. The Reykjavik Metropolitan area continues to see increasing levels of petty crime and minor assaults directly connected to the increasing number of tourists it attracts. Reykjavik also has higher than average (for Iceland) reports of domestic violence, sexual assaults, automobile theft, vandalism, property damage, and other street crimes, which is typical for any large urban area.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on the Implementation of Council Framework
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 7 April 2009 THE EUROPEAN UNION 8083/09 LIMITE CRIMORG 48 ENFOPOL 64 ENFOCUSTOM 35 COMIX 261 NOTE from : Presidency to : delegations No. prev. doc. 16780/08 CRIMORG 212 ENFOPOL 253 ENFOCUSTOM 109 COMIX 888 Subject : Guidelines on the implementation of Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 December 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union Delegations will find enclosed the guidelines on the "Swedish Framework Decision", endorsed by the Council on 27-28 November 2008 and adapted to take account of the results of the road test and additional contributions of delegations to the Annexes. This latest version includes the new chapters 2.3 and 2.4, following the discussion of the Ad Hoc Working Group on 19 February 2009. For information, an annex has been added containing the references of the Member States' notifications of bilateral agreements. 8033/09 NP/hm 1 DG H 3A LIMITE EN ANNEX FRAMEWORK DECISION (2006/960/JHA) OF 18 DECEMBER 2006 ON SIMPLIFYING THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENCE BETWEEN LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CONTENTS1 0. Introduction 1. Implementation of the Framework Decision 1.1 Competent law enforcement authorities 1.2 List of information that can be transmitted pursuant to the Framework Decision 1.3 Contacts in the case of urgency 2. Use of the Framework Decision 2.1 Channel of communication 2.2 Requests in cases of urgency 2.3 Exchange with Europol 3. Links to more information Annexes I.
    [Show full text]
  • List of N.SIS II Offices and the National Sirene Bureaux
    2.7.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 222/173 List of N.SIS II List of N.SIS II Offices and the national Sirene Bureaux ( 2019/C 222/02) In accordance with common Articles 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council dated 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (1) (SIS II Regulation) and of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA dated 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second gener- ation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (2) (SIS II Decision) each Member State shall designate an authority which shall have the central responsibility for its N.SIS II (the N.SIS II Office) and another authority which shall ensure the exchange of supplementary information. The Member States shall inform the Management Authority of their N.SIS II office and their Sirene Bureau which will publish the list in the Official Journal of the European Union. The present consolidated list is based on information communicated by Member States by 15 March 2019. BELGIUM SIS II Bureau NS-SIS II Police fédérale — Direction de l’information et des moyens ICT (DRI) NS-SIS Bureau Federale Politie — Directie van de informatie en de ICT middelen (DRI) NS-SIS II Office Federal Police — Information and ICT directorate (DRI) Rue Royale, 202A — Koningstraat, 202A 1000 Bruxelles/Brussels SIRENE Commission Sirene Police fédérale — Direction de la coopération policière internationale (CGI) Sirene Commissie Federale Politie — Directie van de internationale politiesamenwerking Sirene Bureau Federal Police — International police cooperation directorate (CGI) Avenue de la Couronne, 145A — Kroonlaan, 145A 1050 Bruxelles/Brussel Email: [email protected] BULGARIA SIS II Министерство на вътрешните работи Ministry of Interior 29 Shesti Septemvri Str.
    [Show full text]
  • 8111/1/00 REV 1 BEP/Kve 1 DG H COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 24 May 2000 THE EUROPEAN UNION 8111/1/00 REV 1 LIMITE SCH-EVAL 27 COMIX 366 REPORT from : the Survey group on Police Cooperation to : the Working Party "Schengen Evaluation" Subject : Schengen evaluation of the Nordic Countries - Police Cooperation 1. Introduction a. Mandate The Survey Group on Police Co-operation was mandated by the Schengen Evaluation Committee to visit the Nordic countries and evaluate their preparation for the full putting into effect of Schengen. The topics to be evaluated can be found in the decision of the (former) Executive Committee of Schengen ( SCH/Com-ex (98) 26 def., no. I.2.b ) It should be stressed that several points indicated in the mandate could not be fully evaluated as such, as they relate to measures that will be fully enforced only once the Schengen acquis is put into effect. When this was the case, the Survey Group has examined the degree of preparation for implementing those measures. Due to the common aspects, the Survey Group has evaluated the points of the mandate under Chapter I (General findings), which applies to the five countries visited. Chapters II to VI will be entirely dedicated to each of the countries visited. 8111/1/00 REV 1 BEP/kve 1 DG H EN b. Previous comments The Survey Group wants to underline the excellent support it received during the visit and the quality of the presentations in all the 5 countries, as well as the willingness of the speakers to give full insight into the current state of preparation in the Nordic countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Study for Strengthening the Legal and Policy Framework for International Disaster Response in Iceland
    STUDY FOR STRENGTHENING THE LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR INTERNATIONAL DISASTER RESPONSE IN ICELAND An analysis of Icelandic legislation and policy framework in light of the European Union Host Nation Support Guidelines Reykjavík 2013 Icelandic Red Cross and LOGOS Legal Services in collaboration with The Department of Civil Protection and Emergency Management of the National Commissioner of the Icelandic Police TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4 Definitions and abbreviations .................................................................................. 6 Part I 1 Country profile overview .................................................................................10 1.1 Territory..................................................................................................10 1.2 Administration .........................................................................................10 1.3 Hazard and risk scenarios ..........................................................................12 1.3.1 Natural disasters ................................................................................12 1.3.2 Other hazards ....................................................................................13 2 Civil protection and Emergency Management in Iceland.......................................13 2.1 Domestic structure of Civil Protection and Emergency Management ................13 2.2 International and Regional Instruments
    [Show full text]
  • “Euro-Anarchists”: the Exchange of Anglo-German Undercover Police Highlights Controversial Police Operations
    Statewatch Analysis Using false documents against “Euro-anarchists”: the exchange of Anglo-German undercover police highlights controversial police operations Matthias Monroy Examination of several recently exposed cases suggests that the main targets of police public order operations are anti‐globalisation networks, the climate change movement and animal rights activists. The internationalisation of protest has brought with it an increasing number of controversial undercover cross‐border police operations. In spite of questions about the legality of the methods used in these operations, the EU is working towards simplifying the cross‐border exchange of undercover officers, with the relevant steps initiated under the German EU presidency in 2007. In October 2010 [1], “Mark Stone,” a political activist with far‐reaching international contacts, was revealed to be British police officer Mark Kennedy [2] prompting widespread debate on the cross‐border exchange of undercover police officers. Activists had noted Kennedy’s suspicious behaviour during a court case and then came across his real passport at his home. Since 2003, the 41‐year‐old had worked for the National Public Order Intelligence Unit (NPOIU) [3], which had been part of the National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit (NETCU) since 2003. The NPOIU was formed at the end of the 1990s to surveil anarchist and globalisation groups as well as animal rights activists. NPOIU and NETCU report to the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), but recent media coverage [4] has led to the restructuring of undercover police operations in the UK with the Home Secretary withdrawing NPOIU’s mandate to lead. This decision follows on from the disclosure that some undercover officers had used sexual relationships in order to gain trust or extract information.
    [Show full text]