DOCSLIB.ORG

Figure 2.10 Distribution of Transfers Between Taxi And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Figure 2.10 Distribution of Transfers Between Taxi And METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS FIGURE 2.10 Legend: DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN TAXI AND OTHER MODES Scale: 1cm2= 15000 2-11 METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS 2.3 Review of the JUMSUT and Terminal Conditions Among the major transportation planning studies conducted for Metro Manila in the past is the Metro Manila Transportation Planning Study (JUMSUT) in 1983-84. The study was undertaken by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Government of Philippines with technical assistance provided by the Government of Japan, through Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). One of the objectives of the study is to prepare the public transport system development plans including the terminal facilities. Traffic surveys and investigations on the public transport systems were carried out carefully and several improvement plans were proposed. However, the implementation of said plans were not realized due to the lack funds. Figures 2.11 to 2.13 are comparative photo essays of the terminal conditions during the JUMSUT and MMUTIS periods. FIGURE 2.11 COMPARISON OF THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT TERMINAL AREAS, JUMSUT AND MMUTIS JUMSUT (1984) MMUTIS (1996) Angle parking of vehicles on road forcing pedestrians to walk on the road where traffic flows. Sidewalk vendors are a sight at most LRT stations forcing pedestrians to encroach on the carriageway. Haphazard bus and jeepney maneuver coupled with disregard of traffic rules by pedestrians. 2-12 METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS FIGURE 2.12 PNR TUTUBAN STATION Old PNR Tutuban Station in 1984 Tutuban Redevelopment (scale model) PNR Tutuban Station area is a redevelopment project with the removal the old station and the building of a new commercial complex. However, there is no provision for a proper public transportation facility. FIGURE 2.13 AURORA BLVD/EDSA INTERSECTION AREA JUMSUT (1984) MMUTIS (1996) Unfortunately, no improvement is observed in this area for the past 10 years or more. It is expected that the on-going LRT Line 3 project will bring about changes to the traffic situation of the area. 2-13 METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS The general traffic conditions at terminal areas for 1984 and 1996 are shown in Figures 2.11 to 2.13. Additionally, succeeding photos depict the existing terminal conditions by major public transport modes. There are presently five (5) types of public transportation modes operating in Metro Manila. These are the PNR railway, LRT (Line 1), Bus, Jeepney and Tricycle. The transportation terminals are basically provided separately by type of mode. (PNR Inter-urban Railway) Presently, the Philippine National Railway (PNR) is the only inter-urban railway operated from north to south in Metro Manila. The PNR rehabilitation project has been recently carried out to provide efficient commuter rail service. However, reliability and efficiency of the service has not improved yet. FIGURE 2.14 EXISTING PNR STATIONS A station in the urban center. Entrance of the station occupied by vendors and squatters. A station in the suburban area showing Station area occupied by squatter houses. passengers on the rail tracks. (LRT Line 1) LRT Line 1 is operating from Monumento to Baclaran passing through the urban center of Metro Manila. The system was initially planned to carry 250 thousand passengers per day. However, almost 400 thousand passengers are presently using the system daily. 2-14 METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS Due to this extremely large demand, major terminal areas are very congested with passengers overflowing from station and pedestrian walkways. Likewise, a lot of jeepneys and tricycles are competing for passengers on the frontage roads of the stations. In order to meet the large demand, Line 1 expansion program is being undertaken. This will eventually place added burden on the operation and management at terminal areas. FIGURE 2.15 EXISTING LRT LINE 1 STATION AREA LRT passengers overflowing at stations. Paralyzed traffic by passenger and Jeepneys. LRT passengers overflowing at sidewalks. Unutilized space in front of LRT station (BUS) The bus transport system is the most important public transportation mode for the medium to long distance trip users in Metro Manila. This is due to the lack of efficient rail-based transport system. A large number of buses on the major arteries are generating serious traffic bottlenecks, particularly at bus stops and terminal areas as shown in Figure 2.16. Presently there are more than 100 bus companies serving urban and inter-urban routes. Their terminals are provided individually, scattered along EDSA and along the LRT Line 1 corridor. The terminal conditions differ from one another. Only a few large bus companies can afford to build a comfortable terminal facility while most of the other companies have to manage within a limited space and facility. Furthermore, there is no appropriate coordination with other public transport modes to access the terminals. 2-15 METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS FIGURE 2.16 EXISTING BUS STOPS AND TERMINALS Insufficient bus stop Double parking disturbing general traffic flow No facility for transfer in front of the bus terminal. Inside of the bus terminal of a large bus company. FIGURE 2.17 EXISTING JEEPNEY TERMINALS Off-road terminal (improper maintenance) Jeepney terminal utilizing local road Off-road terminal (vacant land) Road-side parking 2-16 METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS (Jeepney) The highest share in the public transportation modes in Metro Manila is the jeepney. There is quite a large number of jeepneys existing basically for short and medium distance commuter trips. The jeepneys are operated by small private companies so that they can use only vacant spaces or road spaces for their terminals. Because of their serious impact on traffic, MMDA and LGU’s in coordination with the jeepney associations are providing appropriate loading and unloading areas for the jeepneys to lessen or avoid their uncontrolled operations on the major arteries. 2.4 Results of the Passenger Interview Survey at Terminal From the transportation planning point of view, the largest problem involving terminals is the traffic congestion around terminal areas. Terminal users are both the victims and the causes of the problem. To better understand the terminal problem, MMUTIS conducted a Passenger Interview Survey in 1996, the pertinent results of which are presented in Table 2.3. TABLE 2.3 TERMINAL PROBLEMS NOTED BY PASSENGERS Jeepney Bus LRT Total Problems No. % No. % No. % No. % Poor outside access 394 18.3 246 21.0 132 14.0 772 18.1 Congestion inside 186 8.6 94 8.0 193 20.4 473 11.1 Unpaved grounds 230 10.7 91 7.8 46 4.9 367 8.6 Unclean surroundings 398 18.5 106 9.0 68 7.2 572 13.4 Poor security 237 11.0 158 13.5 73 7.7 468 11.0 Poor waiting facilities 365 16.9 269 23.0 177 18.8 811 19.0 Undisciplined drivers 128 5.9 66 5.6 7 0.7 201 4.7 Others 63 2.9 3 0.3 62 6.6 128 3.0 No Answer 153 7.1 139 11.9 186 19.7 478 11.2 Total 2,154 100.0 1,172 100.0 944 100.0 4,270 100.0 Source: MMUTIS, 1996 8% 1% 17% Poor Outside Access Congestion Inside 23% Unpaved Ground Unclean Surrounding Poor Security 26% Poor Waiting Facilities Undisciplined Drivers 10% Others 9% 6% 2-17 METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS The combined totals for all three transport modes showed “poor waiting facilities” as the terminal problem most frequently mentioned by the respondents (19%), followed by “poor outside access” (18%), and “unclean surroundings” (13%). Among the transport modes, bus terminals were considered to have more poor outside access (21%). The LRT terminals were viewed as congested (20%). The jeepney terminals, on the other hand, were assessed to have a problem of unpaved grounds (11%). 2.5 Identified Problems and Issues Transportation terminal problems are summarized in Table 2.4. While the problems remain unchanged since 1983 (JUMSUT), the magnitude of these problems has increased. TABLE 2.4 SUMMARY OF CURRENT PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT TERMINALS CBD’s Suburban Areas Public a) Increasing walking distance a) Accessibility to trunk Transport in access, transfer PT routes Passengers b) Increasing discomfort in b) Longer waiting time waiting and access c) Lesser choice of c) Increasing danger in waiting, destinations loading/unloading d) Safety of travel d) Increasing difficulties in transfer Operators/ a) Lack of turn-around spaces a) Profitability Drivers b) Lack of waiting spaces Terminal Users c) Lack of loading/unloading places/facilities Other Road a) Traffic congestion in terminal Users areas b) Non-availability of parking spaces From a) Increasing overall traffic cost a) Providing reasonable Government/ due to increasing bottleneck level of public transport Overall National in terminal area service to isolated Economic b) Decreasing accessibility to areas Viewpoint economic growth centers c) Decreasing development potentials at growth centers d) Increasing difficulties in route control and management 2-18 METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 5: TRANSPORTATION TERMINALS 2.6 Key Issues in Developing Terminals 2.6.1 Role of Public Sector The Government has played a minimal role in developing transportation terminals in Metro Manila. However, as traffic congestion worsens everyday, both the public and private sectors are realizing the importance of terminal construction. At present, the following terminals have been proposed: a) FTI Bus-Jeepney Terminal (Private); b) Fort Bonifacio Multi-Modal Station (Private); c) Valenzuela Multi-Modal Station (Private); and d) Alabang Bus-Jeepney Terminal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Impediments to Urban-Rural Connectivity in Cdi Cities
    ASSESSMENT OF IMPEDIMENTS TO URBAN-RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN CDI CITIES Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project CONTRACT NO. AID-492-H-15-00001 JANUARY 27, 2017 This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and do not necessarily reflect the view of USAID or the United States Agency for International Development USAID Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project Page i Pre-Feasibility Study for the Upgrading of the Tagbilaran City Slaughterhouse ASSESSMENT OF IMPEDIMENTS TO URBAN-RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN CDI CITIES Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project CONTRACT NO. AID-492-H-15-00001 Program Title: USAID/SURGE Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Philippines Contract Number: AID-492-H-15-00001 Contractor: International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Date of Publication: January 27, 2017 USAID Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project Page ii Assessment of Impediments to Urban-Rural Connectivity in CDI Cities Contents I. Executive Summary 1 II. Introduction 7 II. Methodology 9 A. Research Methods 9 B. Diagnostic Tool to Assess Urban-Rural Connectivity 9 III. City Assessments and Recommendations 14 A. Batangas City 14 B. Puerto Princesa City 26 C. Iloilo City 40 D. Tagbilaran City 50 E. Cagayan de Oro City 66 F. Zamboanga City 79 Tables Table 1. Schedule of Assessments Conducted in CDI Cities 9 Table 2. Cargo Throughput at the Batangas Seaport, in metric tons (2015 data) 15 Table 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation History of the Philippines
    Transportation history of the Philippines This article describes the various forms of transportation in the Philippines. Despite the physical barriers that can hamper overall transport development in the country, the Philippines has found ways to create and integrate an extensive transportation system that connects the over 7,000 islands that surround the archipelago, and it has shown that through the Filipinos' ingenuity and creativity, they have created several transport forms that are unique to the country. Contents • 1 Land transportation o 1.1 Road System 1.1.1 Main highways 1.1.2 Expressways o 1.2 Mass Transit 1.2.1 Bus Companies 1.2.2 Within Metro Manila 1.2.3 Provincial 1.2.4 Jeepney 1.2.5 Railways 1.2.6 Other Forms of Mass Transit • 2 Water transportation o 2.1 Ports and harbors o 2.2 River ferries o 2.3 Shipping companies • 3 Air transportation o 3.1 International gateways o 3.2 Local airlines • 4 History o 4.1 1940s 4.1.1 Vehicles 4.1.2 Railways 4.1.3 Roads • 5 See also • 6 References • 7 External links Land transportation Road System The Philippines has 199,950 kilometers (124,249 miles) of roads, of which 39,590 kilometers (24,601 miles) are paved. As of 2004, the total length of the non-toll road network was reported to be 202,860 km, with the following breakdown according to type: • National roads - 15% • Provincial roads - 13% • City and municipal roads - 12% • Barangay (barrio) roads - 60% Road classification is based primarily on administrative responsibilities (with the exception of barangays), i.e., which level of government built and funded the roads.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    Republic of the Philippines Department of Transportation and Communications and the Light Rail Transit Authority MANILA LRT1 EXTENSION, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROJECT Preliminary Information Memorandum June 2012 Transaction Advisors With Assistance From DOTC/LRTA – Manila LRT1 Extension, Operations and Maintenance Project: Preliminary Information Memorandum June 2012 Disclaimer This Preliminary Information Memorandum (PIM) has been prepared by the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) on behalf of their clients, the Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) and the Light Rail Transit Authority (LRTA), in line with their mandate as Transaction Advisors to the DOTC in the development, structuring and tendering of the Manila LRT1 Extension, Operations and Maintenance Project as a Solicited Transaction under the Philippine Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) Law or Republic Act (RA) 6957, as amended by RA 7718. This PIM does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all of the information that a prospective participant may consider material or desirable in making its decision to participate in the tender. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made, or responsibility of any kind is or will be accepted by the DBP, IFC, LRTA, the DOTC, or the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (ROP) or any of its agencies, with respect to the accuracy and completeness of this preliminary information. The DOTC and LRTA, by themselves or through their Advisors the DBP and IFC, may amend or replace any of the information contained in this PIM at any time, without giving any prior notice or providing any reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report
    10th Regional EST Forum in Asia, 14-16 March 2017, Vientiane, Lao PDR Intergovernmental Tenth Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia 2030 Road Map for Sustainable Transport ~Aligning with Sustainable Transport Development Goals (SDGs)~ Country Report (Draft) The Philippines ------------------------------------- This country report was prepared by the Government of The Philippines as an input for the Tenth Regional EST Forum in Asia. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. 10th Regional EST Forum in Asia, 14-16 March 2017, Vientiane, Lao-PDR a) Philippines Country EST Report b) Department of Transportation (covering from Nepal EST c) List other Line Ministries/Agencies contributing to preparation of the Country Forum 2015 to Lao EST Report: Forum 2017) d) Reporting period: 2015-2017 With the objective of demonstrating the renewed interest and commitment of Asian countries towards realizing a promising decade (2010-2020) of sustainable actions and measures for achieving safe, secure, affordable, efficient, and people and environment-friendly transport in rapidly urbanizing Asia, the participating countries of the Fifth Regional EST Forum in Asia discussed and agreed on a goodwill and voluntary declaration - “Bangkok Declaration for 2020 – Sustainable Transport Goals for 2010-2020.” At the Seventh Regional EST Forum held in Bali in 2013, the participating countries adopted the “Bali Declaration on Vision Three Zeros- Zero Congestion, Zero Pollution and Zero Accidents towards Next Generation Transport Systems in Asia” reinforcing the implementation of Bangkok 2020 Declaration (2010-2020) with emphasis to zero tolerance towards congestion, pollution and road accidents in the transport policy, planning and development.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. MAERSK LINE VS COURT of APPEALS FACTS: Maersk Line Is
    1. MAERSK LINE VS COURT OF APPEALS FACTS: Maersk Line is engaged in the transportation of goods by sea, doing business in the Philippines through its general agent Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas. Private respondent Efren Castillo is the proprietor of Ethegal Laboratories, a firm engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. On November 12, 1976, private respondent ordered from Eli Lilly. Inc. of Puerto Rico through its agent in the Philippines, Elanco Products, 600,000 empty gelatin capsules for the manufacture of his pharmaceutical products. The capsules were placed in six (6) drums of 100,000 capsules each valued at US $1,668.71. The 600,000 empty gelatin capsules in six drums were already shipped on board MV "Anders Maerskline" for shipment to the Philippines via Oakland, California. Shipper Eli Lilly, Inc. specified the date of arrival to be April 3, 1977. Said cargo of capsules were mishipped and diverted to Richmond, Virginia, USA and then transported back Oakland, Califorilia. The goods finally arrived in the Philippines on June 10, 1977 or after two (2) months from the date specified in the memorandum. As a consequence, private respondent as consignee refused to take delivery of the goods on account of its failure to arrive on time. Private respondent alleging gross negligence and undue delay in the delivery of the goods, filed an action before the trial for rescission of contract with damages against petitioner and Eli Lilly, Inc. as defendants. Denying that it committed breach of contract, petitioner alleged in its that answer that the subject shipment was transported in accordance with the provisions of the covering bill of lading and that its liability under the law on transportation of good attaches only in case of loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods as provided for in Article 1734 of Civil Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Battling Congestion in Manila: the Edsa Problem
    Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific No. 82, 2013 BATTLING CONGESTION IN MANILA: THE EDSA PROBLEM Yves Boquet ABSTRACT The urban density of Manila, the capital of the Philippines, is one the highest of the world and the rate of motorization far exceeds the street capacity to handle traffic. The setting of the city between Manila Bay to the West and Laguna de Bay to the South limits the opportunities to spread traffic from the south on many axes of circulation. Built in the 1940’s, the circumferential highway EDSA, named after historian Epifanio de los Santos, seems permanently clogged by traffic, even if the newer C-5 beltway tries to provide some relief. Among the causes of EDSA perennial difficulties, one of the major factors is the concentration of major shopping malls and business districts alongside its course. A second major problem is the high number of bus terminals, particularly in the Cubao area, which provide interregional service from the capital area but add to the volume of traffic. While authorities have banned jeepneys and trisikel from using most of EDSA, this has meant that there is a concentration of these vehicles on side streets, blocking the smooth exit of cars. The current paper explores some of the policy options which may be considered to tackle congestion on EDSA . INTRODUCTION Manila1 is one of the Asian megacities suffering from the many ills of excessive street traffic. In the last three decades, these cities have experienced an extraordinary increase in the number of vehicles plying their streets, while at the same time they have sprawled into adjacent areas forming vast megalopolises, with their skyline pushed upwards with the construction of many high-rises.
    [Show full text]
  • 4) Shops Around LRT Stairs at All LRT Stations, Food Stall and Copying
    MMUTIS Appendices 4) Shops around LRT stairs At all LRT stations, food stall and copying service are operating under the LRT stairs. They occupy the space not only under the stair but also in the outer area depriving space for passengers and pedestrians. 5) Loading and unloading activities of jeepneys Jeepneys are more convenient for passengers because they stop at any point along the route to pick up or unload passengers. From the viewpoint of efficient traffic operation, disorderly behaviour of jeepney is a main factor that reduces the capacity. The problem is often observed at the exit side of intersection and in front of LRT station. In the former case, vehicles queuing inside the intersection block the flow on the crossing street. In the latter case, jeepney even waits on the busy street until they get enough passengers. They pay little attention to the impact that they give on the traffic flow. 9.9 Proposed Improvement Plan Improvement plans have been prepared for the bottleneck and problematic intersection/area along the route. In addition, rehabilitation of street lighting facility, application of pavement markings and removal of shops around LRT stairs are proposed for the entire route. Measures that can be implemented under the existing condition are selected and proposed here. Further study is necessary for some measures, as there are other projects or plans such as LRT Line 2 or EDSA LRT at these locations, which create additional demand or change in the pattern of vehicular and pedestrian movements. As mentioned above, congestion is created by the fact that there are many pedestrians along the route, particularly near LRT stations, while sidewalk is narrow and often occupied by street vendors.
    [Show full text]
  • Dltb Bus Schedule to Bulan Sorsogon
    Dltb Bus Schedule To Bulan Sorsogon Antlike Sarge expostulate no levers dilutees latest after Baillie ranging doggone, quite weather-bound. Circumstantial and desmoid Skipp never impawn homologically when Charlton enchains his wallower. Frank disentomb his crambo tie-ins unflatteringly or unwholesomely after Jacob conglobing and overcropped mesially, unstaunchable and sartorial. Advertise with them directly to the place and dispose them to sorsogon bus schedule re boarding pass along west If premises are planning to carbon from Manila to Bicol taking the bus going to Bicol is the cheapest and most readily available option too you DLTB offers the best bus going to Bicol from Manila and vice-versa. MORE TRAVEL GUIDES BELOW! Rawis Laoang Northern Samar Sorsogon Sorsogon Maasin Southern Leyte Select Destination Search go More Routes Powered by PinoyTravel Inc. Nasha sajna da honda na po kalimutan mg mga bus from here on it is located on a jeepney terminal. Rizal while aboard a dltb co greyhound bus schedules are. Hi guys, Isarog and DLTB are all fully booked. If pain from Sorsogon City car a bus bound for Bulan and alight at Irosin. By commuters, though is key, NCR Giftly. Below we provide an importance of the bus schedules for policy route. From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia Del Monte Land Transport Bus Co Slogan Wherever you are. From Minalungao National Park in General Tinio, all in Camarines Norte. On a tight budget? Two types of dogs. Well theres cavite sa pamasahe ng van terminal lky metro bus or lrt dltb bus stations are. Philtranco Regular Aircon Bulan EDSA-Cubao Legazpi City 700 AM Php795.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ergonomic Study on the UP-Dilimanjeepney Driver’S Workspace and Driving Conditions
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Manufacturing 3 ( 2015 ) 2597 – 2604 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015 An ergonomic study on the UP-Dilimanjeepney driver’s workspace and driving conditions Ma. Carmella Coz, Paul Jason Flores, Kim Louie Hernandez, Alyssa Jean Portus* College of Engineering, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines Abstract The Philippine Jeepney is one of the most popular, the most accessible and cheapest medium of public transportation in the country. During their driving period, an average of 10 hours a day, the Filipino jeepney drivers are exposed to sustained awkward postures. This research aims to evaluate the drivers’ workspace and driving conditions in relation to their anthropometric measurements and their workspace dimensions in order to determine the sources of awkward postures.A comprehensive survey among jeepney drivers inside the UP Diliman campus was conducted to identify the discomforts experienced by the drivers. In addition, a workspace evaluation in comparison with the drivers’ anthropometric measurement was also administered to seek out discrepancies that accounts for the discomforts felt. Results reveal that jeepney drivers’ working conditions pose danger to their health and safety. For instance, there is an insufficient distance between the steering wheel and driver’s seat causing restraint to the drivers’ mobility. The limited height of the windshield also blocks the driver’s line of sight keeping the drivers leaning forward when looking for traffic signs. Recommendations were made to improve the working conditions of the Filipino jeepney drivers. © 2015 PublishedThe Authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Paintings in Thailand: a Post-Modern Urban Art Form in Comparative Perspective Cohen, Erik
    www.ssoar.info Bus paintings in Thailand: a post-modern urban art form in comparative perspective Cohen, Erik Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Cohen, E. (2013). Bus paintings in Thailand: a post-modern urban art form in comparative perspective. ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 6(2), 242-263. https://doi.org/10.4232/10.ASEAS-6.2-2 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-401520 ASEAS 6(2) Aktuelle Südostasienforschung / Current Research on South-East Asia Bus Paintings in Thailand: A Post-Modern Urban Art Form in Comparative Perspective Erik Cohen1 Citation Cohen, E. (2013). Bus paintings in Thailand: A post-modern urban art form in comparative perspective. ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 6(2), 242-263. Studies of paintings on motorized vehicles are rare. Existing studies indicate that such paintings play a role in national identity politics or serve as means of representation of an alternative national his- tory. This article deals with the origins and execution of airbrush paintings on charter tour coaches in Thailand, and with the sources and styles of the motifs represented on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Manila Office Property Market Study (FINAL REPORT)
    Metro Manila Office Property Market Study (FINAL REPORT) 19 November 2020 Prepared by: Prepared for: Theresa Teodoro DDMP REIT, Inc. Karla Domingo Veronica Cabigao Our Ref: CIP/CONS20-026 19 November 2020 DDMP REIT Inc. 10th Floor, Tower 1 DoubleDragon Plaza DD Meridian Park corner Macapagal Avenue and EDSA Avenue Bay Area, Pasay City Attn: Ms. Hannah Yulo-Luccini Re: Metro Manila Office Property Market Study (the ‘Project’) With reference to your instructions received on July 2020, we have prepared the Metro Manila Office Property Market Update (the “Project”) for your perusal. As we understand, this report will serve as an attachment to the REIT Plan and submission to the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE). The market report is enclosed herewith. Yours faithfully, For and on behalf of Colliers International Philippines, Inc. ___________________________________________ Theresa Teodoro Director Valuation and Advisory Services 1 Metro Manila Office Property Market Study (FINAL REPORT) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 5 INSTRUCTIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 5 INFORMATION SOURCES ......................................................................................................................... 5 CAVEATS AND ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Squatters of Capital: Regimes of Dispossession and the Production of Subaltern Sites in Urban Land Conflicts in the Philippines Christopher John “CJ” Chanco May 2015
    Land grabbing, conflict and agrarian‐environmental transformations: perspectives from East and Southeast Asia An international academic conference 5‐6 June 2015, Chiang Mai University Conference Paper No. 23 Squatters of Capital: Regimes of Dispossession and the production of subaltern sites in urban land conflicts in the Philippines Christopher John “CJ” Chanco May 2015 BICAS www.plaas.org.za/bicas www.iss.nl/bicas In collaboration with: Demeter (Droits et Egalite pour une Meilleure Economie de la Terre), Geneva Graduate Institute University of Amsterdam WOTRO/AISSR Project on Land Investments (Indonesia/Philippines) Université de Montréal – REINVENTERRA (Asia) Project Mekong Research Group, University of Sydney (AMRC) University of Wisconsin-Madison With funding support from: Squatters of Capital: Regimes of Dispossession and the production of subaltern sites in urban land conflicts in the Philippines by Christopher John “CJ” Chanco Published by: BRICS Initiatives for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) Email: [email protected] Websites: www.plaas.org.za/bicas | www.iss.nl/bicas MOSAIC Research Project Website: www.iss.nl/mosaic Land Deal Politics Initiative (LDPI) Email: [email protected] Website: www.iss.nl/ldpi RCSD Chiang Mai University Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai 50200 THAILAND Tel. 66­53­943595/6 | Fax. 66­53­893279 Email : [email protected] | Website : http://rcsd.soc.cmu.ac.th Transnational Institute PO Box 14656, 1001 LD Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 662 66 08 | Fax: +31 20 675 71 76 E­mail: [email protected] | Website: www.tni.org May 2015 Published with financial support from Ford Foundation, Transnational Institute, NWO and DFID.
    [Show full text]