DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Sanitation in Cities: a Framework for Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Sanitation in Cities: a Framework for Action The demands of sustainable devel- opment require us to rethink the current approach towards the way in which we dispose of our waste. Considerable progress is being made in the areas of solid waste recycling and renew- able energy production but the sustainable manage- ment of human waste is an area that is still in its infancy. However, the need for sustainable sanitation is becoming critical due to the need to safeguard | A framework for action | A framework fresh water sources from contamination, recycle valuable nutrients contained in excreta for food production, and to conserve energy. Sustainable Sanitation in Cities seeks to define what sustainable sanitation means in the urban context and how this can be achieved within the constraints and complexities of the urban environ- ment. The authors redefine the relationship between sanitary engineering and urban planning and thus contribute to the ongoing debate on urban sustain- ability. The book is dedicated to innovative approaches to sanitation and illustrates what putting sustainable sanitation into action means in practice. Sustainable Sanitation in Cities is a joint open source publication of the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance and International Forum on Urbanism. This book can be downloaded from: www.susana.org and www.ifou.org SUSTAINABLE SANITATION IN CITIES SANITATION SUSTAINABLE The Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) is a loose network of over 120 organisations from 45 different countries working together to promote sustainable sanitation solutions in urban and rural contexts through knowledge sharing and joint publications. The International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU) is a network of universities, research institutes and knowledge centers with the task to strengthen the international and interdisciplinary collaboration in the field of Urbanism. International Forum on Urbanism Christoph Lüthi, Arne Panesar, Thorsten Schütze, Anna Norström, Jennifer McConville, Jonathan Parkinson, Darren Saywell, Rahul Ingle [P.] [P.] Sustainable Sanitation in Cities A framework for action Christoph Lüthi, Arne Panesar, Thorsten Schütze, Anna Norström, Jennifer McConville, Jonathan Parkinson, Darren Saywell, Rahul Ingle Sustainable Sanitation in Cities: A Framework for Action Christoph Lüthi, Arne Panesar, Thorsten Schütze, Anna Norström, Jennifer McConville, Jonathan Parkinson, Darren Saywell, Rahul Ingle (2011) ISBN: 978-90-814088-4-4 First Edition 2011 Published by Papiroz Publishing House | Rijswijk | The Netherlands www.papiroz.com Text editing: Christoph Lüthi & Thorsten Schütze Layout and cover design: Papiroz design | 2011 Foreword Sanitation is usually a forgotten problem in the low-income areas of our fast growing cities, where close to 5,000 children under 5 years old are dying every day because of lack of access to basic sanitation. As the World becomes progressively more urban, most of civilisation, who currently reside in small towns and large villages, will see their living environment change. The pace of urbanisation will impact many areas of their life, their living environment and their access to basic services. The challenges to provide basic sanitation services will play an essential part of the planning and management of these settlements. Without proper approaches, we risk more unplanned slums and the potential threat that the small urban settlements of today will become the haphazard and unplanned mega-cities of tomorrow. Planning sanitation for cities needs to give due attention to the diverse needs of all city residents, rich and poor, old and young. Integrated approaches must be developed where on-site systems and off-site systems work together. The International Year of Sanitation went a long way to raise the level of awareness and to provide a set of key messages, that all could follow in meeting the challenge. However this was a global call to action, which needs practical and realistic interventaions. Much of the developed world relies on piped, centralised sewerage systems, serving mainly the high income residents. These systems have their limitations including that: they need too much energy for transport and treatment of wastewater and; they waste precious elements in wastewater like phosphorus – a limited resource, badly needed as fertiliser. One issue is certain, without sustainable reuse of excreta, we are wasting a valuable resource. As we consider options for urban areas of all sizes, reuse of nutrients must be part of the plan. For urban areas, the challenge will be providing effective sanitary arrangements linked to sustainable collection and transport and treatment of the excreta to the point of re-use. In some smaller urban centres, closer to the rural hinterland, this will be more easily accomplished than in the mega cities. So-called “ecological approaches” to sanitation must be the main solution in a sustainable urban future. This book “Sustainable Sanitation in Cities” prepared by partners of the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) network is a real eye-opener. It takes a look at some of the methods that have worked well in the past, to guide us in solving the problems of the future. By addressing sanitation as a key element of the urban metabolism, and by linking sanitation with urban planning and neighbouring sectors like solid waste management or waste recycling, it allows for a holistic approach. It is only through this comprehensive view that new solutions come to light and there are many opportunities. In the cities of tomorrow, we will need to focus more on recycling energy. A good example being biogas generation from wastewater and sludges. Water will also become an increasingly scarce commodity. Greywater (from showers and sinks) can be treated in urban constructed wetlands or used to water and fertilise urban green spaces. Such examples of productive sanitation systems will form an integral part of infrastructure in sustainable cities. “Sustainable Sanitation in Cities” is a call for action, as we battle against the challenges of an urbanising world, we have to start today to adapt and develop innovative solutions and approaches. This book provides guidance on concepts and sustainable solutions which are tried and tested. I hope this book will kick start a new approach to urban sanitation founded on sound ecological principles. It provides an inclusive approach and helps us to advance up the learning curve faster. Most importantly it reminds us that neglecting ecological approaches to sanitation is a missed opportunity, which will greatly improve the lives of future generations. Dr Graham Alabaster Chief of Section I Water Sanitation & Infrastructure Branch UN-Habitat Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following peer reviewers who took the time to provide critical inputs and/or original material that greatly improved the quality of the document: • Adrian Atkinson • Barbara Evans • Blanca Elena Jiménez Cisneros • Elisabeth Kvarnström • Duncan Mara • Kevin Tayler • Linda Gaulke • Members of the SuSanA secretariat at GIZ The authors acknowledge support from: • The Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South: Research Partnerships for Mitigating Syndromes of Global Change, co-funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the participating institutions. • The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH with funding from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). Disclaimer The authors are responsible for the content of this book. The content does not necessarily reflect the views of the reviewers, International Forum on Urbanism, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Eawag, Stockholm Environment Institute, TU Delft, International Water Association or the Swedish Water House. How to cite Lüthi, C., Panesar, A., Schütze, T., Norström, A., McConville, J., Parkinson, J., Saywell, D., Ingle, R. (2011). Sustainable Sanitation in Cities - A Framework for Action. Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) & International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU), Papiroz Publishing House, The Netherlands. Content 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................10 Context .............................................................................................................................................................................................10 Rationale .........................................................................................................................................................................................10 Vision ................................................................................................................................................................................................12 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................12 Target Audience ............................................................................................................................................................................14 Structure ..........................................................................................................................................................................................15 2. STATE OF URBAN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reducing the Food Wastage Footprint
    toolkit.xps:Layout 1 13/06/13 11.44 Pagina 3 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-107741-2 (print) E-ISBN 978-92-5-107743-6 (PDF) © FAO 2013 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact- us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through publications- [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • “Sustainable” Sanitation: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Areas
    sustainability Review Towards “Sustainable” Sanitation: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Areas Kim Andersson *, Sarah Dickin and Arno Rosemarin Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, 115 23 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (A.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-73-707-8609 Academic Editors: Philipp Aerni and Amy Glasmeier Received: 8 June 2016; Accepted: 2 December 2016; Published: 8 December 2016 Abstract: While sanitation is fundamental for health and wellbeing, cities of all sizes face growing challenges in providing safe, affordable and functional sanitation systems that are also sustainable. Factors such as limited political will, inadequate technical, financial and institutional capacities and failure to integrate safe sanitation systems into broader urban development have led to a persistence of unsustainable systems and missed opportunities to tackle overlapping and interacting urban challenges. This paper reviews challenges associated with providing sanitation systems in urban areas and explores ways to promote sustainable sanitation in cities. It focuses on opportunities to stimulate sustainable sanitation approaches from a resource recovery perspective, generating added value to society while protecting human and ecosystem health. We show how, if integrated within urban development, sustainable sanitation has great potential to catalyse action and contribute to multiple sustainable development goals. Keywords: urbanization; sustainable sanitation; resource recovery; urban planning and development; public health 1. Introduction Sanitation is fundamental to healthy and productive urban life, and the provision of sanitation services for fast-growing urban populations is one of the world’s most urgent challenges. Currently, more than 700 million urban residents lack improved sanitation access globally, including 80 million who practise open defecation [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Ecological Sanitation: a Review on Technology and Methods
    Journal of Cleaner Production 125 (2016) 1e21 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Cleaner Production journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro Review Constructing the ecological sanitation: a review on technology and methods * Ming Hu, Bin Fan , Hongliang Wang, Bo Qu, Shikun Zhu State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China article info abstract Article history: Wastewater often contains valuable resources (e.g. organic matter and nutrients). Different from con- Received 29 April 2014 ventional sanitation approaches, the ecological sanitation (Eco-San) system is based on the closure of Received in revised form material flow cycles to recover resources with minimized demands on other resources. The review 29 February 2016 comprehensively summarized the main components of the Eco-San system (user interface, collection Accepted 2 March 2016 and conveyance, storage and primary treatment, and reuse/disposal), the frequently-used evaluation Available online 15 March 2016 methods, and the framework of evaluation index system. Some typical practical cases were discussed to demonstrate the managerial implications and popularize the applications of the Eco-San system. The Keywords: fi fi Ecological sanitation results show that the Eco-San systems are bene cial to resource ef ciency, agricultural use of the organic Evaluation matters and nutrients, and energy recovery although some shortages exist (e.g. high cost, cultural Wastewater treatment constraints, and complex operation and management). The evaluation methods can help to identify the Sustainability restriction factors, contributing factors and measures to improve the efficiency of the future Eco-San Rural system.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Nomads: Techno and New Age As Transnational Countercultures
    1111 2 Global Nomads 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 A uniquely ‘nomadic ethnography,’ Global Nomads is the first in-depth treat- 3111 ment of a counterculture flourishing in the global gulf stream of new electronic 4 and spiritual developments. D’Andrea’s is an insightful study of expressive indi- vidualism manifested in and through key cosmopolitan sites. This book is an 5 invaluable contribution to the anthropology/sociology of contemporary culture, 6 and presents required reading for students and scholars of new spiritualities, 7 techno-dance culture and globalization. 8 Graham St John, Research Fellow, 9 School of American Research, New Mexico 20111 1 D'Andrea breaks new ground in the scholarship on both globalization and the shaping of subjectivities. And he does so spectacularly, both through his focus 2 on neomadic cultures and a novel theorization. This is a deeply erudite book 3 and it is a lot of fun. 4 Saskia Sassen, Ralph Lewis Professor of Sociology 5 at the University of Chicago, and Centennial Visiting Professor 6 at the London School of Economics. 7 8 Global Nomads is a unique introduction to the globalization of countercultures, 9 a topic largely unknown in and outside academia. Anthony D’Andrea examines 30111 the social life of mobile expatriates who live within a global circuit of counter- 1 cultural practice in paradoxical paradises. 2 Based on nomadic fieldwork across Spain and India, the study analyzes how and why these post-metropolitan subjects reject the homeland to shape an alternative 3 lifestyle. They become artists, therapists, exotic traders and bohemian workers seek- 4 ing to integrate labor, mobility and spirituality within a cosmopolitan culture of 35 expressive individualism.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    editorial note index amber 832, 1028 American Dream 753 American Institute of Architects “a major modification of the human organism, 21 Club 601, 697 (AIA) 106, 150, 695, 816, 858, 869, 1066, namely its ability to pay attention, occurred when 3D printing 114, 159, 1449 2159, 2277 a major cultural innovation, domestication, was 9/11 676, 685, 844, 918–919, 1382, 1387, American Restroom Association adopted. … the house … should be viewed as 1760–1761, 2130 641, 695, 1646 Aalto, Alvar 639, 762, 772–773, 859 American Society of Heating a technical and cognitive instrument, a tool for aboriginal 1058, 1430 Refrigeration and Air Conditioning thought as well as a technology of shelter.” Abraj Al-Bait tower, Mecca 703, 786 Engineers 814, 825, 858 absolutism 900–901 American Society of Mechanical — Peter J. Wilson, The Domestication of Abu Dhabi 125, 480, 537, 1047, 1430, Engineers 290, 380, 2041, 2117 1551, 2288 American Standard 785, 1601, 1624, the Human Species (Yale, 1988). Acconci, Vito 59, 63 1673, 1675, 1680, 2279, 2281, 2286 Ackerman, James 898, 2333 American Standards Association 183 When our species domesticated itself – started acoustics 150, 203, 223, 260–261, Americans with Disabilities Act, living in permanent dwellings rather than 264–265, 267–269, 272, 274, 279, 304, 1990 1648, 1721, 1764 temporary encampments – architecture remade 348, 352, 360, 380, 485, 825, 1150 Ammannati, Bartolomeo 1936, 1963 Acropolis 900 amphitheater 1094, 1166, 1247, 2136, our sensory world in a revolution never seen acrylic 813, 842, 949, 1016, 1394
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing Wastes an Integrated System Analysis of Bioenergy, Ecological Sanitation, and Soil Fertility Management in Smallholder Farming in Karagwe, Tanzania
    Valuing wastes An Integrated System Analysis of Bioenergy, Ecological Sanitation, and Soil Fertility Management in Smallholder Farming in Karagwe, Tanzania vorgelegt von Dipl.-Ing. Ariane Krause geb. in Freiburg i. Brsg. von der Fakult¨at VI – Planen Bauen Umwelt der Technischen Universit¨at Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Ingenieurwissenschaften - Dr.-Ing. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzende: Prof. Dr. Eva Nora Paton Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Johann K¨oppel Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Vera Susanne Rotter (Fak. III) Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Friederike Lang (Albert-Ludwigs-Universit¨at Freiburg) Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 26. Januar 2018 Berlin 2019 make compost not war Abstract My dissertation had as its starting point the intention of two Tanzanian farmer’s initiatives and their German partners to disseminate sustainable cooking and sanitation technologies to smallholder households in Karagwe District, in northwest Tanzania (TZ). These locally developed and adapted technologies include improved cook stoves (ICS), such as microgasifiers, and a system combining biogas digesters and burners for cooking, as well as urine-diverting dry toilets and thermal sterilization/pasteurization for ecological sanitation (EcoSan). Currently, the most common combination of technologies used for cooking and sanitation in Karagwe smallholdings is a three-stone fire and pit latrine. Switching to the new alternatives could potentially lead to (i) optimized resource consumption, (ii) lower environmental emissions, and (iii) a higher availability of domestic residues for soil fertility management. The latter include biogas slurry from anaerobic digestion, powdery biochar from microgasifiers, and sanitized human excreta from EcoSan facilities. These residues are ‘locally available resources’ that can be used for on-farm material cycling.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE LIST Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops
    AGRA (Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa). 2013. Africa Agriculture REFERENCE LIST Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops. Nairobi: AGRA. http://agra-alliance.org/ AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 2012. download/533977a50dbc7/. “Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors on Labeling of Genetically AgResearch. 2016. “Shortlist of Five Holds Key to Reduced Methane Modified Foods.” Emissions from Livestock.” AgResearch News Release. http://www. Abalos, D., S. Jeffery, A. Sanz-Cobena, G. Guardia, and A. Vallejo. 2014. agresearch.co.nz/news/shortlist-of-five-holds-key-to-reduced-methane- “Meta-analysis of the Effect of Urease and Nitrification Inhibitors on Crop emissions-from-livestock/. Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency.” Agriculture, Ecosystems, and AHDB (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board). 2017. “Average Milk Environment 189: 136–144. Yield.” Farming Data. https://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/resources-library/market- Abalos, D., S. Jeffery, C.F. Drury, and C. Wagner-Riddle. 2016. “Improving information/farming-data/average-milk-yield/#.WV0_N4jyu70. Fertilizer Management in the U.S. and Canada for N O Mitigation: 2 Ahmed, S.E., A.C. Lees, N.G. Moura, T.A. Gardner, J. Barlow, J. Ferreira, and R.M. Understanding Potential Positive and Negative Side-Effects on Corn Yields.” Ewers. 2014. “Road Networks Predict Human Influence on Amazonian Bird Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 221: 214–221. Communities.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281 (1795): 20141742. Abbott, P. 2012. “Biofuels, Binding Constraints and Agricultural Commodity Ahrends, A., P.M. Hollingsworth, P. Beckschäfer, H. Chen, R.J. Zomer, L. Zhang, Price Volatility.” Paper presented at the National Bureau of Economic M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Sanitation - for Mankind and Nature
    Ecosan Norway Ecological Sanitation - for mankind and nature NLHNORGES The Norwegian University of Life Sciences LANDBRUKSHØGSKOLE Foreword Last year the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) was commis- sioned to write a “Think piece” on Ecological sanitation by the Norwegian Ministry of Environment as part of the preparations for 12th Session of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD). This year the Univer- sity of Life Sciences is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to contribute to the 13th Session of the UN Commission on Sustain- able Development in New York, with a focus on “water, sanitation and settlement”. The Norwegian University of Life Sciences is in the forefront in the development of so called ecological sanitation in Norway. Ecological sanitation is part of ecological engineering that was defined by last year’s Stockholm Water Prize laureates professor W. J. Mitch and professor S. E. Jørgensen as: “Development of human society with nature for the benefit of both”. The essence of this sentence is sustainability and this is also the main philosophy guiding the activities at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. It is unlikely that one single system can solve all current and future sanitation needs. Large investments have been made in conventional cen- tralized sewage systems that will be in operation for decades, but conven- tional systems will evolve as the principles of ecological engineering are communicated throughout the engineering society. Totally new systems, as well as hybrid or combination systems, will appear. With the present and growing focus on water and sanitation and their importance to human health and environmental quality, the interest in ecological engineering is rapidly growing.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Sanitation Systems: Health, Environment and Governance Challenges
    Sustainable Sanitation Systems: Health, Environment and Governance Challenges The Case of Human Rights-Based Policy Reform in Alternative Wastewater Management Strategies Florian Thevenon WaterLex Highlights WaterLex is an international public interest development Context: About 2.5 billion people Limits: Field awareness campaigns Policy reform: Integrating the Human organization based in Geneva, Switzerland. It is a UN- do not use an improved sanitation and advocacy actions are Rights to Water and Sanitation Water Partner with UN ECOSOC special consultative status. facility, and about 1 billion people encouraged to improve and monitor into policies and regulations, Its mission is to develop sustainable solutions based on practise open defaecation which is water quality and hygiene practices; including for service providers and human rights to improve water governance worldwide, one of the main causes of drinking because wastewater, even when regulators, could therefore be used particularly in regard to consistent water law and policy water pollution and diarrhoea treated, is highly enriched in to increase the access to safely frameworks. It works with an alliance of interested parties incidences. There is an urgent hazardous pollutants. Wastewater managed sanitation services and to improve water-governance frameworks, bringing them need to increase the access to recycling, safe water reclamation achievement of SDG 6. Local and in line with country obligations under international human safely managed sanitation services, and reuse must therefore be national governments therefore rights law. It is an official member of the UN Environment and a need for a paradigm shift regulated and aligned with national need to integrate their national Global Wastewater Initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Toilets and Night Soil (Types, Treatment & a Bit of History)
    Toilets and Night Soil (Types, Treatment & A Bit of History) May 2006 Japan Association of Drainage and Environment Night Soil and Sewerage Research Group Preface Night Soil and Sewerage Research Group is a substructure of Japan Association of Drain- age and Environment. This Group conducts research mainly on culture and history of toi- lets/night soil, and has been planning lecture meetings or field visits for seven years now. In 2003, in an effort to encapsulate our activities, we wrote a book called What do you think Toilets and Night Soil? published by Gihoudou Publishing Co. We have also written arti- cles for specialized field magazines to supply information on this field. Night Soil had been used as fertilizer for farms until quite recently. A result of this practice was the affliction of a large number of people with parasites. Flush Toilets using sewerage system, which is the most popular type, community treatment plants, Johkasou (private treatment facility), had been effective in the eradication of parasite disease in a short period of time. This booklet is intended to inform people of other countries about toilet history in Japan. At first glance, you might ask: Why should I bother reading about toilets (and other delicate matters) at all? Well, the convenient water-flushed toilets were not always available, you know. Then, your next question might be: Hmmm…what did they use in those days? There are seven chapters in this booklet. I’m sure you will find a selection that interests you. To make the presentation more appealing and easily understood, we have carefully chosen the photos to include here.
    [Show full text]
  • ENSURE HEALTHY LIVES and PROMOTE WELL-BEING for ALL Experiences of Community Health, Hygiene, Sanitation and Nutrition
    INNOVATION IN LOCAL AND GLOBAL LEARNING SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY ENSURE HEALTHY LIVES AND PROMOTE WELL-BEING FOR ALL Experiences of Community Health, Hygiene, Sanitation and Nutrition LEARNING CONTRIBUTIONS OF REGIONAL CENTRES OF EXPERTISE ON EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Editors: Unnikrishnan Payyappallimana Zinaida Fadeeva www.rcenetwork.org CONTENTS Contents Foreword by UNU-IAS 2 Foreword by UNU-IIGH 3 List of Abbreviations 4 About RCEs 6 Editorial 8 COMMUNITY HEALTH 1. RCE Grand Rapids 20 2. RCE Central Semenanjung 28 3. RCE Borderlands México-USA 38 4. RCE Greater Dhaka 48 5. RCE Yogyakarta 56 6. RCE Srinagar 62 WATER, SANITATION, HYGIENE 7. RCE Central Semenanjung 72 8. RCE Kunming 82 This document should be cited as: Innovation in Local and Global Learning Systems for Sustainability 9. RCE Bangalore 90 Ensure Healthy Lives and Promote Well-being for All Experiences of Community Health, Hygiene, Sanitation and Nutrition 10. RCE Goa 98 Learning Contributions of the Regional Centres of Expertise on Education for Sustainable Development, UNU-IAS, Tokyo, Japan, 2018 11. RCE Srinagar 104 Editing: Unnikrishnan Payyappallimana NUTRITION Zinaida Fadeeva 12. RCE CREIAS-Oeste 112 Technical Editors: Hanna Stahlberg 13. RCE Munich 122 Kiran Chhokar 14. RCE Mindanao 136 Coordination: Hanna Stahlberg Nancy Pham Way Forward 142 Design and layout: Fraser Biscomb Acknowledgements 147 © The United Nations University 2018 Contacts 148 Published by: United Nations University, Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS) 5-53-70, Jingumae, Shibuya Tokyo 150-8925, Japan Email: [email protected] Web: www.rcenetwork.org/portal The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout the publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNU-IAS concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Sanitation and Sustainable Nutrient Recovery Education: Considering the Three Fixes for Environmental Problem-Solving
    sustainability Article Ecological Sanitation and Sustainable Nutrient Recovery Education: Considering the Three Fixes for Environmental Problem-Solving Julian Junghanns 1,* and Thomas Beery 2 1 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Kristianstad University, SE-291 88 Kristianstad, Sweden 2 Faculty of Education, Kristianstad University, SE-291 88 Kristianstad, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 March 2020; Accepted: 25 April 2020; Published: 28 April 2020 Abstract: In the context of phosphorus as a finite resource and the unsustainable character of current sanitation in Europe, this paper examined social factors in a technological transition towards sustainable sanitation. The evaluation is based on the idea of cognitive, structural, and technological fixes to achieve environmental protection. The cognitive fix has been evaluated through literature and a European-wide survey with universities that offer civil and environmental engineering programs. Contrary to an initial hypothesis, ecological sanitation and nutrient recycling are taught by the majority (66%) of responding programs. There are, however, local differences in terms of context and detail of the education. The main impediments for teaching were identified as academic resources (especially in Belgium, Germany and Denmark) and the technological status quo (Ireland, Italy, Spain and some programs of the United Kingdom). Instructors’ personal commitment and experience was evaluated to be a key factor for an extensive coverage of sustainable sanitation in higher education programs. The role of higher education has a critical role to play in changing sanitation practices, given the unique professional developmental stage of students and the potential for a cognitive fix to contribute to meaningful change.
    [Show full text]