DOCSLIB.ORG

2014-Complete-Sov.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014-Complete-Sov.Pdf Statement of Vote June 3, 2014, Statewide Direct Primary Election California Secretary of State Debra Bowen Table of Contents ABOUT THIS STATEMENT OF VOTE ............................................................................................... 1 REGISTRATION AND PARTICIPATION Voter Registration Statistics by County .......................................................................................... 2 Voter Participation Statistics by County .......................................................................................... 3 Historical Voter Registration and Participation in Statewide Primary Elections 1914 - 2014 ........ 4 SPECIAL ELECTION RESULTS State Senator, 4th District, General Election ................................................................................. 6 State Senator, 32nd District, Primary Election ............................................................................... 7 State Senator, 32nd District, General Election .............................................................................. 8 State Senator, 40th District, Primary Election ................................................................................ 9 State Senator, 16th District, Primary Election .............................................................................. 10 State Senator, 16th District, General Election ............................................................................. 11 State Assemblymember, 80th District, Primary Election ............................................................... 12 State Assemblymember, 52nd District, Primary Election ............................................................. 13 State Assemblymember, 52nd District, General Election ............................................................ 14 State Senator, 26th District, Primary Election ............................................................................... 15 State Assemblymember, 45th District, Primary Election ............................................................... 16 State Assemblymember, 45th District, General Election .............................................................. 17 State Assemblymember, 54th District, Primary Election .............................................................. 18 State Senator, 23rd District, Primary Election .............................................................................. 19 VOTE SUMMARIES Statement of Vote Summary Pages ............................................................................................. 20 VOTING SYSTEMS USED BY COUNTIES ....................................................................................... 30 THE STATEMENT OF VOTE Explanatory Note .......................................................................................................................... 31 Certificate of the Secretary of State .............................................................................................. 32 Governor by County ...................................................................................................................... 33 Lieutenant Governor by County .................................................................................................... 42 Secretary of State by County ........................................................................................................ 45 Controller by County ..................................................................................................................... 48 Treasurer by County ..................................................................................................................... 51 Attorney General by County .......................................................................................................... 54 Insurance Commissioner by County ............................................................................................. 57 Board of Equalization Member by County .................................................................................... 60 United States Representative in Congress by District .................................................................. 63 State Senator by District (even-numbered districts only) ............................................................ 78 State Assemblymember by District ............................................................................................... 84 Superintendent of Public Instruction by County .......................................................................... 104 State Ballot Measures (Propositions 41 and 42) by County ....................................................... 107 ABOUT THIS STATEMENT OF VOTE The Statement of Vote reports the county-by-county votes cast for each candidate and measure on the ballot. In a statewide contest such as Governor, the vote is reported by all 58 counties and listed in alphabetical order with the statewide total at the bottom. Candidates are listed in order by party, with the two major parties first (i.e., Democratic, Republican, American Independent, Green, Libertarian, and Peace and Freedom). Write-in candidates are listed last. For example: Edmund G. Richard Akinyemi “Jerry” Glenn Tim William Andrew Neel Agbede Brown Champ Donnelly Aguirre Blount Kashkari DEM DEM REP REP REP REP REP Alameda 1,537 153,638 2,040 14,475 784 3,891 11,881 Percent 0.8% 76.0% 1.0% 7.2% 0.4% 1.9% 5.9% State Totals 37,024 2,354,769 79,066 643,236 35,125 89,749 839, 767 Percent 0.9% 54.3% 1.8% 14.8% 0.8% 2.1% 19.4% Legislative and congressional district contests are similarly reported, indicating the counties that comprise the district. For example: 6th Congressional District Doris Joseph Matsui* McCray Sr. DEM REP Sacramento 58,826 20,567 Yolo 3,814 1,898 District Totals 62,640 22,465 Percent 73.6% 26.4% Ballot measures are reported by county in alphabetical order. For example: Proposition 41 Proposition 42 Veterans Housing & Homeless Public Records. Open Bond Act of 2014 Meetings. Reimbursements. Yes No Yes No Alameda 140,879 57,406 126, 343 63,544 Percent 71.0% 29.0% 66.5% 33.5% Alpine 301 180 202 192 Percent 62.6% 37.4% 51.3% 48.7% State Totals 2,708,933 1,434,060 2,467,357 1,522,406 Percent 65.4% 34.6% 61.8% 38.2% 1 VOTER REGISTRATION STATISTICS BY COUNTY REPORT OF REGISTRATION AS OF MAY 19, 2014 American Americans Peace and No Party County Eligible Registered Democratic Republican Independent Elect Green Libertarian Freedom Other Preference Alameda 1,030,130 803,728 449,524 109,824 16,346 90 9,839 4,028 2,917 49,570 161,590 Alpine 876 766 284 231 30 0 11 6 1 5 198 Amador 26,768 21,200 6,608 9,430 937 2 116 220 50 64 3,773 Butte 167,394 119,081 39,621 43,030 4,146 14 1,451 1,234 505 1,687 27,393 Calaveras 35,583 27,263 8,324 11,456 1,284 4 246 359 97 226 5,267 Colusa 12,291 7,653 2,592 3,371 198 0 20 34 14 2 1,422 Contra Costa 715,697 528,162 260,467 127,576 13,780 31 3,282 3,052 1,171 1,557 117,246 Del Norte 18,378 12,398 4,204 4,530 575 1 106 115 50 172 2,645 El Dorado 135,580 106,944 30,732 46,204 4,316 5 862 1,166 295 932 22,432 Fresno 569,314 412,181 163,221 151,983 11,003 26 1,557 2,104 1,118 4,991 76,178 Glenn 18,235 11,978 3,581 5,278 454 0 38 86 39 26 2,476 Humboldt 104,663 75,411 31,168 19,127 2,459 2 2,809 775 318 212 18,541 Imperial 94,854 58,197 28,989 13,131 1,377 8 138 225 233 370 13,726 Inyo 13,678 9,509 2,921 4,064 399 1 87 83 26 47 1,881 Kern 496,204 334,435 114,846 132,627 11,390 33 840 2,200 1,038 379 71,082 Kings 77,977 47,420 16,596 21,027 1,264 4 92 252 96 155 7,934 Lake 49,002 33,987 13,327 9,017 1,390 2 495 390 182 71 9,113 Lassen 17,408 13,433 3,186 6,415 728 3 41 101 43 74 2,842 Los Angeles 6,076,302 4,857,424 2,461,286 1,011,346 109,902 2,513 24,790 27,114 35,811 353,245 831,417 Madera 85,586 52,817 17,573 22,907 1,664 3 199 309 144 174 9,844 Marin 176,609 148,762 80,848 26,537 3,274 6 2,078 867 259 465 34,428 Mariposa 15,248 10,574 3,109 4,654 477 1 111 104 26 166 1,926 Mendocino 64,240 47,400 21,723 10,108 1,668 1 1,806 443 280 189 11,182 Merced 150,629 94,779 40,635 31,661 2,924 5 488 539 321 184 18,022 Modoc 6,991 5,454 1,356 2,686 282 0 25 45 12 9 1,039 Mono 9,678 5,802 1,912 2,017 245 0 57 42 18 0 1,511 Monterey 235,319 164,032 83,204 39,988 3,854 11 1,061 894 428 229 34,363 Napa 91,388 71,241 32,761 18,642 2,214 4 805 503 205 413 15,694 Nevada 76,711 61,711 20,163 22,517 2,348 2 1,430 689 164 140 14,258 Orange 1,955,899 1,411,232 447,818 578,655 37,760 264 5,596 11,638 3,554 4,739 321,208 Placer 257,989 200,829 55,364 93,350 4,605 18 1,062 2,613 473 569 42,775 Plumas 15,383 12,030 3,643 5,117 616 2 85 102 40 1 2,424 Riverside 1,387,385 887,643 316,161 357,104 27,088 84 2,589 5,464 3,122 7,024 169,007 Sacramento 957,597 688,443 299,257 212,065 20,386 51 3,884 4,846 5,791 1,357 140,806 San Benito 34,480 23,778 11,098 7,079 611 3 130 132 54 91 4,580 San Bernardino 1,269,053 851,326 327,206 295,701 30,933 97 3,081 5,343 4,010 1,986 182,969 San Diego 2,124,563 1,544,841 538,819 510,693 52,540 136 7,689 12,359 4,234 5,620 412,751 San Francisco 622,063 434,922 243,620 36,649 7,592 27 6,890 2,768 1,435 2,133 133,808 San Joaquin 426,618 293,837 125,565 103,456 7,789 22 847 1,491 869 1,353 52,445 San Luis Obispo 202,445 150,302 50,231 59,420 4,340 8 1,282 1,317 322 1,759 31,623 San Mateo 488,370 354,994 180,773 67,001 7,642 19 2,452 1,922 772 859 93,554 Santa Barbara 280,119 193,900 79,134 58,484 5,157 13 1,470 1,401 457 2,098 45,686 Santa Clara 1,150,600 805,922 360,089 179,619 16,826 41 4,209 4,990 2,173 1,437 236,538 Santa Cruz 186,842
Load more

Recommended publications
  • December 12, 2006, at 7:10 P.M
    MINUTES GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Garden Grove was called to order in the Council Chamber of the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, on Tuesday, December 12, 2006, at 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: (5) MAYOR DALTON, COUNCIL MEMBERS KREBS, LEYES, NGUYEN, ROSEN ABSENT: (0) NONE INVOCATION AND PLEDGE Assistant City Manager Les Jones gave the Invocation. Council Member Krebs led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF THE ELECTION (F: 53.1) (XR: 58.2) There were no comments from the public. DECLARATION OF RESULTS OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION – RESOLUTION NO. 8752-06 (F: 58.2) It was moved by Council Member Leyes, seconded by Council Member Rosen, and carried by unanimous vote, that full reading of Resolution No. 8752-06 be waived, and said Resolution entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW, be and hereby is adopted. PRESENTATIONS Van Tran, Assemblyman, 68th District, and Ken Maddox, Former Assemblyman 68th District and former City Council Member, -1- 12/12/06 approached the dais and congratulated the newly elected Mayor and Council Members. They presented gifts and certificates to outgoing Council Members Leyes and Krebs and thanked them for their years of service. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR EXTENDED TO OUTGOING COUNCIL MEMBER LEYES (F: 53.1) (XR: 58.2) Council Member Leyes thanked the Mayor, City Council Members, and City staff for the recent reception held in his honor.
    [Show full text]
  • Too Many to Ignore the Latino Vote in 2010 and Beyond
    Too Many to Ignore The Latino Vote in 2010 and Beyond Angela M. Kelley and Gebe Martinez October 2010 Introduction Two years after playing a decisive role in the election of President Barack Obama, Latino voters are poised to play a critical role in the November 2010 contests and in years to come as their population and voting numbers increase. The key question for Latinos, as with all voters, is whether the general malaise with government will deflate turnout at the polls, or whether frustration with a stale- mated Congress will actually fuel election participation to let their voices be heard. Midterm elections usually draw fewer voters than in presidential election years, but this year of the cranky voter threatens to upset political norms, and the Latino electorate will be a major factor in the post-election analyses. Whatever the outcomes, there is one dynamic that will not change this November and beyond: Candidates who draw Hispanics to the polls by addressing their top issues such as immigration and the economy will be rewarded with the votes of this ever-expanding segment of the electorate. Those who do not may rue the day they ignored Latinos’ concerns. Whipping up immigration Heated gubernatorial and U.S. Senate races are in play in eight states where Latinos make up at least 10 percent of voters: Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, and Texas, plus Connecticut and Illinois, which also have growing Latino electorates.1 1 Center for American Progress Action Fund | Too Many to Ignore The strength of the Latino voter turnout is also primed to determine the outcome in 17 Projected Latino vote in 2010 of the toughest races for seats in the House 35,000 of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • With a Majority Hispanic Population in Tulare County and a Growing
    To: --Central California-- Question: With a majority Hispanic population in Tulare County and a growing majority elsewhere in the Valley, why does Rep Nunes and other elected officials still fail to address issues and critical concerns of with this growing constituency? -(indeed, the need of fairly drawn districts to represent a large growing Valley ethnic population, instead of ignoring it!)- _____________________ --All of California-- Hispanic groups dispute new California political maps By GILLIAN FLACCUS and DON THOMPSON, Associated Press Posted: 06/22/2011 08:09:01 AM PDT SANTA ANA -- Hispanic advocacy groups in California are alarmed about new political maps that sketch proposed boundaries for congressional and state legislative districts, saying the changes will disenfranchise the fastest-growing segment of the population in a state where the number of Hispanic politicians has soared during the past two decades. The debate over that concern is likely to escalate in the coming weeks, as an independent redistricting commission takes public comment and wrestles with revisions before voting on a https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=d92a6b21a7&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=130d... 6/27/2011 CA Citizen's Redistricting Commission Mail - Fwd: Hispanics -Gerrymandered again!--di... Page 2 of 3 final version Aug. 15. Since the commission released its draft earlier this month, advocacy groups have begun organizing their members and are urging Hispanic voters to attend public hearings in force to voice their concerns. Several groups have submitted their own proposals, and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund raised the possibility of legal action under the 1965 Voting Rights Act if it is not satisfied with the final results.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Congressional Election
    STATISTICS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010 SHOWING THE VOTE CAST FOR EACH NOMINEE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR, REPRESENTATIVE, AND DELEGATE TO THE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS, TOGETHER WITH A RECAPITULATION THEREOF COMPILED FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES BY KAREN L. HAAS CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES http://clerk.house.gov (Corrected to June 3, 2011) WASHINGTON : 2011 STATISTICS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010 (Number which precedes name of candidate designates Congressional District.) ALABAMA FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR Richard C. Shelby, Republican ................................................................. 968,181 William G. Barnes, Democrat ................................................................... 515,619 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 1,699 FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE 1. Jo Bonner, Republican .............................................................................. 129,063 David Walter, Constitution Party of Alabama ........................................ 26,357 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 861 2. Martha Roby, Republican .......................................................................... 111,645 Bobby Bright, Democrat ............................................................................ 106,865 Write-in ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Orange County Voter
    NEAL KELLEY Registrar of Voters REGISTRAR OF VOTERS Mailing Address: 1300 South Grand Avenue, Bldg. C P.O. Box 11298 Santa Ana, California 92705 Santa Ana, California 92711 (714) 567-7600 TDD (714) 567-7608 FAX (714) 567-7627 www.ocvote.com Dear Orange County Voter: Thank you for registering to vote! You’ll find all party ballots have been consolidated into one easy-to-read sample ballot. Detailed instructions have also been included for your reference. This Sample Ballot contains information for the June 3, 2014 Statewide Direct Primary Election. Please take a moment to be prepared prior to voting. • Vote-by-Mail: You can save time and vote-by-mail. If you are a permanent vote-by- mail voter your ballot will be sent automatically to you. If you are not a permanent vote-by-mail voter you may apply by using the application on the back of this pamphlet or by visiting ocvote.com/votebymail. The last day to request a vote-by-mail ballot is May 27, 2014. Please remember to mail your ballot early to avoid any potential postal delays. • Polling Place: If you choose to vote at your polling place please plan ahead. Parking is limited at some locations and you can avoid congestion by voting mid-day if possible. You will have the option of voting an electronic or paper ballot at the polls. Simply advise the poll worker of your preference when signing the roster. • Questions: California’s new Top Two Primary changes the way primary elections are conducted. Now all voters – regardless of party – can vote in the Primary Election.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Information Guide for 2014, Primary Election
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Propositions California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 2014 Voter Information Guide for 2014, Primary Election Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_props Recommended Citation Voter Information Guide for 2014, Primary Election (2014). http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_props/1329 This Proposition is brought to you for free and open access by the California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Propositions by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OFFICIAL VOTER INFORMATION GUIDE I, Debra Bowen,Certificate Secretary ofof State Correctness of the State of California, hereby certify that this guide has been prepared in accordance with the law. Witness my hand and the Great Seal of the State in Sacramento, California, this 10th day of March, 2014. Debra Bowen Secretary of State Secretary of State Dear Fellow Voter: By registering to vote, you have taken the first step in playing an active role in deciding California’s future. Now, to help you make your decisions, my office has created this Official Voter Information Guide—just one of the useful tools for learning more about what will be on your ballot and how this election works. Information about candidates and measures unique to your region is available in your county sample ballot booklet. And for even more details about the electoral process—including how to check your voter registration status, where to vote, or whether your vote-by-mail ballot was received—visit www.sos.ca.gov/elections or call my toll-free voter hotline at (800) 345-VOTE.
    [Show full text]
  • Covered Organizations and 527S
    Visa Inc. 2010 Political Contributions Report Visa Inc. makes political contributions in strict compliance with all applicable laws and the Visa Inc. Political Participation, Lobbying, and Contributions Policy. While corporations are not permitted to contribute to U.S. federal political campaigns or to national political parties, they can contribute to state and local candidates in many jurisdictions. Political contributions will not be given in anticipation of, in recognition of, or in return for any official act and corporate funds may not be used for any unlawful, improper or unethical purpose. The following is a list of political contributions Visa made during calendar 2010. The political contributions listed are aggregated on a yearly basis and may reflect contributions to multiple campaign committees associated with a single legislator, and also may reflect primary and/or general election contributions. State Legislator Party Amount California Assembly Tom Ammiano D $1,000.00 Joel Anderson R $6,800.00 Toni Atkins D $1,000.00 Jim Beall, Jr. D $1,000.00 Bill Berryhill R $1,500.00 Tom Berryhill R $1,500.00 Marty Block D $2,000.00 Bob Blumenfield D $3,000.00 Susan Bonilla D $500.00 Steven Bradford D $2,000.00 Julia Brownley D $2,000.00 Joan Buchanan D $2,900.00 Charles M. Calderón D $4,000.00 Wilmer Amina Carter D $1,000.00 Wesley Chesbro D $1,500.00 Connie Conway R $2,000.00 Joe Coto D $3,000.00 Mike Davis D $2,000.00 Hector De La Torre D $1,500.00 Kevin De León D $3,000.00 Roger Dickinson D $1,000.00 Mike Eng D $3,000.00 Noreen Evans D $3,000.00 Mike Feuer D $3,900.00 Nathan Fletcher R $1,000.00 Paul Fong D $3,000.00 Felipe Fuentes D $3,000.00 Jean Fuller R $2,000.00 Warren T.
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Tread on Me: Analyzing the Effects of the Tea Party on Voting
    Don’t Tread on Me: Analyzing the Effects of the Tea Party on Voting Patterns of House Democrats Nicole DeMont Department of Communication Stanford University Advisor: Shanto Iyengar June 4, 2014 Abstract: The Tea Party reached its peak during the 2010 midterm elections and helped propel Republicans into the House of Representatives. While commentary has focused on the Republican Party’s shift to the right in response to the Tea Party movement, this paper examines the Tea Party’s influence on the Democratic Party. Using Washington Post data on party voting, I find that Democrats who beat Tea Party candidates in competitive races are 6.5 percent more likely to vote with the Democratic Party in the congressional session following the 2010 midterm election. This brings the likelihood of voting with the Party up to 89.4 percent on any given vote, compared to the baseline of 82.9 percent. Possible explanations for this Tea Party effect are presented. Amid the mounting concern over the national debt and the size of the federal government, the Tea Party movement emerged in early 2009. On Tax Day, April 15, 2009, in what would be one of the largest rallies the movement would see, Tea Party protests took place in over 750 cities across the country. President Obama’s proposed healthcare bill only fueled the growth and frustrations of the Tea Party movement. Although the Democratic leadership, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, had originally dismissed the movement, by August 2009 the Democrats were forced to pay attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Recall Davis Campaign Petition Cleared
    State Bar of California, Office of Governmental Affairs The Sacramento Scene Vol. 3, No. 24 November 3, 2004 SPECIAL ISSUE Term limits, Tuesday’s election and other factors will have a disparate effect on the Judiciary 2004 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS Committees of the two houses. Tuesday’s election produced a record voter turnout The composition of the Senate Judiciary Committee in California, but essentially no change in the likely will remain virtually unchanged, except for composition of the two houses of the Legislature. the replacement of termed-out Byron Sher with lawyer-legislator Joe Dunn (D-Santa Ana). Dunn Not surprisingly, Democrats retained their 25-15 will also replace Senator Martha Escutia (D- margin in the state Senate, winning 11 of the 20 Whittier) as Judiciary Committee Chair, though races being contested. View election results for the Escutia will remain on the committee. The Senate State Senate from the Secretary of State’s office. Judiciary panel will remain the most lawyer-heavy in the Legislature, with six of the seven members In the Assembly, Democrats retained a 48-32 being attorneys and the seventh, Sen. Gil Cedillo (D- advantage. All incumbents from both parties held Los Angeles), a law school graduate. on to their seats, in most cases by substantial margins, and all open seats stayed with the party In contrast, the Assembly Judiciary Committee will that formerly held them. View election results for be almost completely overhauled. Five of the the Assembly from the Secretary of State’s office. committee’s 10 members are leaving via term limits, including all three Democratic lawyers – one of Although all but one attorney candidate emerged which is committee chair Ellen Corbett.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 10-Draft 12-16-10
    Volume 12, Issue 2 Fall 2010 Election Edition In this Issue Judicial Branch Prepares for Leadership Change; Judicial Branch Leadership Change….1 .Judicial Branch Budget......................1 Chief Justice-elect Looks Forward to the Challenge Judicial Council-Sponsored Legisla- n January 2, 2011, Californians tion……………………………………………..2 will witness the transition of O Legislative Review…….……………………3 leadership in the nation’s largest Bench-Bar Coalition Fall 2010 Meet- judicial system. Chief Justice Ronald M. ing………………………….…………............6 George, who over the last 14 years has Judicial Administration Fellowship…..8 led the judicial branch through Chief Justice-elect, Legislators Take landmark reforms, will retire as Chief Oath in Capitol Ceremonies………...10 Justice of California and Chair of the Major Changes in Traffic Violator Judicial Council, the policymaking body School Administration……….…………11 for the courts. Stepping in on January End-of-Year Legislative Statistics…….15 3 will be Associate Justice Tani Cantil- Chief Justice-elect Tani Cantil-Sakauye accepts congratulations from Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (center) and Chief Justice November 2010 Election Coverage..16 Sakauye of the Court of Appeal, Third Ronald M. George (left) at the August State Capitol press confer- ence announcing her nomination. (Photo courtesy of Office of New Laws Workshops………………….20 Appellate District who was elected to Governor Schwarzenegger). the post on November 2, 2010. The Legislative Calendar Sacramento native becomes the 28th “Chief Justice George has given many December 6, 2010 Chief Justice, the second woman and years of dedicated service to the people 2011-12 Regular Session convenes. the first Filipina-American to hold the of California and we wish him a well- January 1, 2011 office.
    [Show full text]
  • Fullerton Mayor
    Vol. 88 Issue 36 November 3, 2010 Fullerton mayor WHAT’S INSIDE elected to city council OPINION Cous’ I Said So: In a close race, Don Bankhead is re-elected Stewart and Colbert for the 2010-11 term ........................................4 See CITY COUNCIL, page 2 FEATURES A guide to the November Fullerton Art Walk Pollak Library studio ........................................5 home to OC Insight program SPORTS A look into the creation of Cal State Fullerton’s The Campus Huddle: own public-affairs television program BCS politics See OC INSIGHT, page 5 ........................................8 dailytitan.com The Student Voice of California State University, Fullerton BROWN IS BACK Courtesy of MCT Local Results California Senate Mayor and retired police chief Democratic incumbent Barbara took race for two long-term seats Boxer keeps her Senate seat in on Fullerton City Council WINNERS & LOSERS Washington Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer take the win for Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg City Council: Don Bankhead Barbara Boxer Democrats in 2010 midterm election Whitman concedes to Jerry Brown KEITH COUSINS everywhere. Let me welcome you all LAURA BARRON-LOPEZ Inc., spent a record $141.5 mil- 21 % Daily Titan here to a great celebration we are go- Daily Titan lion from her personal funds as 51 % Former Ful- ing to have tonight.” well as an estimated $20 million lerton Police Shortly after Bauman finished his in contributions from voters. Carly Fiorina Captain, Californians cheered on as they welcome, the attendees erupted with Meg Whitman, Republican gu- Throughout the campaign, the endorsed by brought back veteran Democrats, re- applause when the large televisions at bernatorial candidate for the state majority of Whitman’s spending Congressman electing Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Massforward Advancing Democratic Innovation and Electoral Reform in Massachusetts
    MassForward Advancing Democratic Innovation and Electoral Reform in Massachusetts November 2019 (Revised January 2020) Acknowledgements Our Funders MassINC would like to thank the Boston Foundation, the Klarman Family Foundation, and the Hyams Foundation for underwriting this research project with generous philanthropic support. Our Partners MassINC is grateful to the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life at Tufts University for making Tisch Fellowship funding available and providing us with Laurel Bliss. Her talent and fresh energy was an enormous contribution to the research effort. We also extend a personal thank you to Dr. Peter Levine, Lincoln Filene Professor and Academic Dean of the Tisch College, who led this project with passion and dedication. Our Advisors MassINC is deeply indebted to advisers who lent their time and talent to guiding us through a complex set of issues. MassINC is singularly responsible for the analysis and recommendations that made their way into this report, and for any of its shortcomings. We list these leaders here solely to thank them for their service and contributions to spirited debate. Jeff Berry Beth Huang Eneida Roman Cheryl Crawford Arielle Jennings Charles Stewart Mo Cunningham Elena Letona Peter Ubertaccio Evan Falchuk Beth Lindstrom Eitan Hersh Keith Mahoney MassForward Advancing Democratic Innovation and Electoral Reform in Massachusetts Peter Levine Benjamin Forman Laurel Bliss Executive Summary . 5 Introduction . 9 I . Four Structural Weaknesses . 10 1. Frequent elections make the electorate less representative and policy outcomes more vulnerable to special interests 10 2. Our elected officials do not reflect our diversity 12 3. Elections are rarely contested and often dominated by insiders 15 4.
    [Show full text]