Certified List of Candidates-Shortlist
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Intuit Inc. Political Contributions February 2020 – July 2020
Intuit Inc. Political Contributions February 2020 – July 2020 State Candidate Name Office Party Amount CA Marc Berman Assembly D $2,000 CA Steven Bradford Senate D $2,000 CA Autumn Burke Assembly D $2,000 CA Phillip Chen Assembly D $2,000 CA David Chiu Assembly D $2,000 CA Ed Chau Assembly D $2,000 CA Jim Cooper Assembly D $2,000 CA Steven M. Glazer Senate D $2,000 CA Adam Gray Assembly D $2,000 CA Tim Grayson Assembly D $2,000 CA Robert M. Hertzberg Senate D $2,000 CA Jacqui Irwin Assembly D $2,000 CA Sydney Kamlager Assembly D $2,000 CA Kevin Kiley Assembly D $2,000 CA Monique Limón Senate D $2,000 CA Evan Low Assembly D $2,000 CA Fiona Ma Treasurer D $4,500 CA Brian Mainschein Assembly D $2,000 CA Mike McGuire Senate D $2,000 CA John M. W. Moorlach Senate R $2,000 CA Kevin Mullin Assembly D $2,000 CA Gavin Newsom Governor D $10,000 CA Janet Nguyen Assembly R $2,000 CA Jim Nielsen Controller R $2,000 CA Anthony J. Portantino Senate D $2,000 CA Henry Stern Senate D $2,000 CA Phil Ting Assembly D $2,000 CA Scott Wiener Senate D $2,000 CA Scott Wilk Senate R $2,000 CA California Democratic Party N/A D $38,800 CA California Republican Party N/A R $16,200 State Candidate Name Office Party Amount IL Bill Brady Senate R $2,000 IL Kelly Burke House D $2,000 IL Cristina Castro Senate D $1,500 IL Jacqui Collins Senate D $500 IL CD Davidsmeyer House R $250 IL Don DeWitte Senate R $500 IL Jim Durkin House R $2,000 IL Emil Jones III Senate D $1,000 IL Camille Lilly House D $750 IL Bob Rita House D $1,000 IL Keith Wheeler House R $1,000 GA John Albers -
2015 Honor Roll
CALIFORNIA SMALL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION and CALIFORNIA SMALL BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE salute these California Legislators for their continued commitment to California’s small businesses in 2015. SUMMA CUM LAUDE Assembly Member Katcho Achadjian (AD 35) Senator Jerry Hill (SD 13) Assembly Member Travis Allen (AD 72) Assembly Member Chris Holden (AD 41) Senator Joel Anderson (SD 38) Assemby Member Jacqui Irwin (AD 44) Assembly Member Toni G. Atkins (AD 78) Assembly Member Young Kim (AD 65) Assembly Member Catharine Baker (AD 16) Assembly Member Tom Lackey (AD 36) Senator Patricia Bates (SD 36) Assembly Member Marc B. Levine (AD 10) Senator Jim Beall (SD 15) Assembly Member Eric Linder (AD 60) Senator Tom Berryhill (SD 8) Senator Carol Liu (SD 25) Assembly Member Frank Bigelow (AD 5) Assembly Member Evan Low (AD 28) Assembly Member Bill Brough (AD 73) Assembly Member Brian Maienschein (AD 77) Assembly Member Cheryl Brown (AD 47) Assembly Member Devon Mathis (AD 26) Assembly Member Autumn Burke (AD 62) Assembly Member Chad Mayes (AD 42) Senator Anthony J. Cannella (SD 12) Assembly Member Jose Medina (AD 61) Assembly Member Ling Ling Chang (AD 55) Senator Holly Mitchell (SD 30) Assembly Member Rocky Chávez (AD 76) Senator William W. Monning (SD 17) Assembly Member Ken Cooley (AD 8) Senator John Moorlach (SD 37) Assembly Member Matt Dababneh (AD 45) Assembly Member Mike L. Morrell (AD 23) Assembly Member Jim L. Frazier, Jr. (AD 11) Assembly Member Jay Olbernote (AD 33) Senator Jean Fuller (SD 18) Assembly Member Patrick O’Donnell (AD 70) Senator Cathleen Galgiani (SD 5) Assembly Member Kristin M. -
August 1, 2016 Agenda
VICE CHAIR LING LING CHANG Assembly MEMBERS JOAQUIN ARAMBULA California Legislature WILLIAM P. BROUGH STATE CAPITOL KEN COOLEY P.O. BOX 942849 JIMMY GOMEZ SACRAMENTO, CA 94249-0124 Committee on Rules CHRIS HOLDEN (916) 319-2800 BRIAN W. JONES FAX (916) 319-2810 BILL QUIRK FREDDIE RODRIGUEZ RICHARD S. GORDON MARIE WALDRON CHAIR PATTY LOPEZ (D-ALT.) JAY OBERNOLTE (R-ALT.) Monday, August 01, 2016 12:50 PM State Capitol, Room 3162 CONSENT AGENDA Referrals 1. Consent Bill Referrals Page 2 Resolutions 2. ACR 45 (Grove) Relative to Ukrainian Famine of 1932–1933. Page 4 3. ACR 185 (Linder) Relative to Concrete Pipe Week. Page 9 4. ACR 196 (Steinorth) Relative to California Manufacturing Day. Page 12 5. SCR 138 (Nielsen) Relative to State park rangers. Page 16 6. SCR 148 (Bates) Relative to Crosswalk Safety Awareness Month. Page 19 7. HR 59 (Quirk) Relative to Muslim Appreciation and Awareness Month. (refer/hear) Page 21 Request to Add Urgency Clause 8. SB 1112 (Cannella) Relative to Utilities: water and sewer systems corporations: transactions. Page 26 Page 1 of 29 REFERRAL OF BILLS TO COMMITTEE 08/01/2016 Pursuant to the Assembly Rules, the following bills were referred to committee: Assembly Bill No. Committee: ACR 195 A.,E.,S.,T. & I. M. HR 57 RLS. HR 58 L. & E. HR 59 RLS. SB 1187 APPR. SCR 126 RLS. SCR 134 HEALTH SCR 137 TRANS. SCR 139 TRANS. SCR 154 RLS. SCR 156 RLS. SCR 157 RLS. Back to Agenda Page 2 of 29 Back to Agenda Page 3 of 29 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 14, 2016 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 11, 2016 california legislature—2015–16 regular session Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. -
MICROCOMP Output File
FINAL EDITION OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS . JANUARY 4, 2001 Compiled by JEFF TRANDAHL, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Republicans in roman (222); Democrats in italic (208); Independents in SMALL CAPS (2); vacancies (3) 1st VA, 4th MN, 32d CA; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member’s district. ALABAMA 1 Sonny Callahan ........................................... Mobile 2 Terry Everett ............................................... Enterprise 3 Bob Riley ..................................................... Ashland 4 Robert B. Aderholt ...................................... Haleyville 5 Robert E. (Bud) Cramer, Jr. ........................ Huntsville 6 Spencer Bachus ........................................... Vestavia Hills 7 Earl F. Hilliard ........................................... Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young ................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Matt Salmon ................................................ Mesa 2 Ed Pastor ..................................................... Phoenix 3 Bob Stump ................................................... Tolleson 4 John B. Shadegg .......................................... Phoenix 5 Jim Kolbe ..................................................... Tucson 6 J. D. Hayworth ............................................ Scottsdale ARKANSAS 1 Marion Berry ............................................... Gillett -
Sample Ballot and Voter Information Pamphlet Format
WHAT’S NEW FOR THIS ELECTION Top Two Primary What is it? In 2010, California voters approved Proposition 14 creating the “Top- Two Primary,” which replaced the traditional party-nominated primary. Under the Top-Two Primary laws, all candidates running, regardless of their party preference, appear on a single combined ballot, and voters can vote for any candidate from any political party. The candidates who receive the highest and second-highest number of votes cast at the Primary election advance to the General election. This change applies to federal and state contests, except for President. The rules for non-partisan contests (i.e. counties, cities, school and special districts) did not change. For the Presidential Primary, Party Ballots Still Exist Since the Top Two Primary rules do not affect the election of party nominee for President, party-specific ballots will be issued for this Presidential Primary Election. Only voters who are registered to vote with a specific party are allowed to vote in that party’s Presidential nominee contest. All Other Contests Are Open to All Voters The new rules apply to U.S. Senate, U.S. Congressional, statewide and state legislative offices. Candidates for these offices are no longer nominated by party. As a result, voters can vote for any candidate on the ballot regardless of the candidate’s party preference. These contests are now referred to as “voter-nominated offices.” Again, in these contests, only the two candidates who receive the highest and second-highest vote totals will be on the ballot in the November General Election. Party Preference and Political Party Endorsement The term "party preference" is now used in place of the term "party affiliation”. -
State Issues
Week of January 14, 2019 State Issues Legislative Analyst This week, the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) released its overview of Governor Newsom’s budget proposal for FY Report on State 2019-20 that was presented last week, and saw a new leader selected to lead this non-partisan organization. The Budget Legislature appointed a new state Legislative Analyst to fill the role Mac Taylor has held for 10 years. They named Gabriel Petek to the post, who most recently worked for Standard and Poor’s Global Ratings San Francisco Office where he is currently the state’s primary credit analyst. He takes the reins on February 4. In addition to getting a new chief, the LAO released its overview of the Governor’s January budget highlighting that that state’s budget position continues to be strong. They also focus on the fact that the Governor’s proposed budget prioritizes the repayments of state debts and a great deal of one-time funding. Nearly half of the discretionary spending is earmarked to pay down state liabilities, including unfunded retirement liabilities and budget debts. Twenty-five (25) percent of the discretionary spending is for one time or temporary funding proposals, and 15 percent for discretionary reserves. The LAO applauds the Governor’s decision to focus on the repayment of state debts. The LAO points out one thing that many took note of – the Governor has outlined many priorities for budgetary spending. And at least some of the proposals are not fully fleshed out or reflected in the budget document. The LAO was not critical of this but pointed out that these un-finalized proposals give the Legislature the opportunity to weigh in with the Administration and have their say in its development. -
Paypal Inc. State Political Contributions (Candidates & Organizations)
PayPal Inc. State Political Contributions (Candidates & Organizations) 2019 Candidate/Organization Amount State Arizona House Victory PAC $1,000.00 AZ Arizona Senate Victory PAC $1,000.00 AZ Arizona Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee $2,000.00 AZ Anthony Rendon for Assembly $2,000.00 CA Portantino for Senate $2,000.00 CA Evan Low $2,000.00 CA Senator Toni Atkins $2,000.00 CA Assemblywoman Autumn Burke $2,000.00 CA Assemblywoman Jacqui Irwin $2,000.00 CA Assemblyman Marc Berman $2,000.00 CA Limon for Assembly 2020 $2,500.00 CA Friends of Jason Barickman $1,000.00 IL Committee to Elect Keith Wheeler $500.00 IL Jil Tracy for State Senate $500.00 IL Citizens to Elect Grant Wehrli $500.00 IL Friends of Terry Link $250.00 IL Citizens for Michael E. Hastings $500.00 IL Friends of Napoleon Harris $500.00 IL Friends of Don Harmon for Senate $500.00 IL Citizens for Durkin $500.00 IL Friends of Kelly M. Burke $250.00 IL Carol Blood for Legislature $500.00 NE Anna Wishart for Legislature $500.00 NE Wayne for Nebraska $500.00 NE Vargas for Nebraska $500.00 NE Friends of Mike McDonnell $500.00 NE Linehan for Legislature $750.00 NE La Grone for Legislature $750.00 NE Friends of Mike Hilgers $500.00 NE Suzanne Geist for Legislature $500.00 NE Calabrese for Assembly $300.00 NJ Craig Coughlin $500.00 NJ Sweeney for Senate $500.00 NJ Troy Singleton for NJ Senate $500.00 NJ Nellie Pou for Senate $500.00 NJ Nicholas Chiaravallotti for Assembly $150.00 NJ Cryan for Senate $150.00 NJ Election Fund of John F. -
Making the Voting Rights Act Relevant to the Demographics of America: a Reponse to Farrell and Johnson Leo F
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 79 | Number 5 Article 7 6-1-2001 Making the Voting Rights Act Relevant to the Demographics of America: A Reponse to Farrell and Johnson Leo F. Estrada Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Leo F. Estrada, Making the Voting Rights Act Relevant to the Demographics of America: A Reponse to Farrell and Johnson, 79 N.C. L. Rev. 1283 (2001). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol79/iss5/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MAKING THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT RELEVANT TO THE NEW DEMOGRAPHICS OF AMERICA: A RESPONSE TO FARRELL AND JOHNSON* LEO F. ESTRADA" Professor Estrada responds to what he views as the three themes of Professor Farrell and Professor Johnson's PrincipalArticle. Estrada argues that the demographic trends that affect political representation are more complex than Farrell and Johnson describe. Estrada begins with a discussion of changing demographics and inter-group conflict, particularly between Latinos, Blacks, and Asians, and discusses the potential political ramifications for these minority groups in the new demography evidenced by the 2000 census. After discussing majority-minority districts, Estradafocuses on the disenfranchisementof Latino and Asian voters and the use of demographic data in the construction of representative districts as it relates to the Latino population. -
Union Calendar No. 499
Union Calendar No. 499 107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 107–798 REPORT ON THE ACTIVITY OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR THE 107TH CONGRESS JANUARY 2, 2003.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. OXLEY, from the Committee on Financial Services, submitted the following REPORT Clause 1(d) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representa- tives requires each standing Committee, not later than January 2 of each odd-numbered year, submit to the House a report on the activities of that committee, including separate sections summa- rizing the legislative and oversight activities of that committee dur- ing that Congress. CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal ............................................................................................... 2 Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................... 3 Rules of the Committee ........................................................................................... 7 Membership and Organization ............................................................................... 19 Legislative and Oversight Activities ...................................................................... 27 Full Committee ..................................................................................................... 29 Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises ....................................................................................................... -
May 19, 2020 Senator Scott Wiener California State Senate Sacramento
May 19, 2020 Senator Scott Wiener California State Senate Sacramento, CA 95814 Via email to: [email protected] cc: [email protected] & [email protected] Re: OPPOSITION of SB 939 – UNFAIRLY NEGATES LEASES & UNEVENLY HARMS BUSINESSES Dear Senator Wiener: Established in 1924, Central City Association is an advocacy organization committed to the vibrancy of Downtown Los Angeles and increasing investment in the region. As you know from our support of SB 50 and SB 827, we are strong advocates for walkable and inclusive communities and greatly appreciate the work you have done to support businesses across California; however, we strongly oppose SB 939 as proposed. CCA understands the impossible fiscal challenges that businesses are facing across the state due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but we believe SB 939 unfairly benefits one business over another. COVID-19 will continue to impact the health and safety of our communities and businesses. As a membership organization that represents approximately 400 organizations in LA County, we know that all businesses are impacted by this pandemic. However, SB 939 only provides protection to a small segment, while shifting economic harm to other private businesses and removing rights from commercial property owners. Governor Newsom has shown strong leadership in issuing a series of executive orders limiting evictions, including Executive Order N-28-20 which gives local government the ability to protect commercial tenants from evictions. Legislative leadership has also proposed a plan that helps lessors and lessees. We request your bill be changed to protect all businesses and not a special subset. -
California's Legislature
TableTable ofof ContentsContents Table of Contents 24 CALIFORNIA’S LEGISLATURE Governor James Rolph, Jr. delivers his inaugural address on the west steps of the State Capitol, January 6, 1931. Table of Contents 25 Chapter III Elections Right of Suffrage In 1972, the people adopted a constitutional amendment substantially revising California’s voting qualifications. The new Article II reflected changes brought about by federal legislation and court decisions. The provisions of this article regulate the right of the people of this state to vote in federal, state, and local elections.1 It provides that any citizen who is 18 years of age and a resident of California is entitled to vote.2 The power to define residence and to provide for registration and free elections resides in the Legislature.3 Furthermore, the Constitution provides that no person who is mentally incompetent or imprisoned or on parole for the conviction of a felony is qualified to vote in California.4 The voter’s right to cast his or her vote in secrecy is also guaranteed by the California Constitution.5 The language formerly contained in the Constitution and the statutes pertaining to suffrage was, perhaps, the most misleading and confusing area in California law as many of the requirements contained therein had been stricken by the courts as being unconstitutional. For example, the prerequisite that a person be able to read the Constitution in the English language was declared to be a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, U.S. Constitution, and -
NO on PROP 6!
Dear Fellow Carpenter; lection Day is Tuesday, November 6. It is our chance to help Vote in the comfort of your home and mail in your ballot, making Eelect candidates who will support Carpenters and our families sure it is postmarked on or before November 6. If you forget to mail and help pass ballot measures that will create more jobs. To the ballot, you can also personally deliver it to your polling place do that, you must vote. If you don’t vote, you are helping elect on election day until 8:00pm. If you don’t have a vote by mail ballot, candidates who want to support policies that will reduce your you can vote at your polling place on election day between 7:00am pay and benefits, not to mention your job itself. By not voting you and 8:00pm. If you have any questions about these endorsements, also help pass those ballot measures that will hurt our jobs and call your local Carpenter facility or go to the Southwest Carpenters our families. website at www.swcarpenters.org. If you need to find your polling place, go to www.voterstatus.sos.ca.gov. The recommendations below were based on participation by carpenters at the local level. I believe our endorsements, Fraternally, especially in local races, are stronger if our local members are Randy Thornhill involved in the endorsement decision. Also, we have supported Executive Secretary-Treasurer candidates regardless of their political party as long as the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters candidate supports the Carpenters. SAN DIEGO & SUPT.