DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Partnerships for a Low-Carbon Future Volume III

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Partnerships for a Low-Carbon Future Volume III American Mayors and Businesses: Building Partnerships for a Low-Carbon Future Volume III Alliance for a Sustainable Future a joint effort by The U.S. Conference of Mayors and the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) January 2020 THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS Bryan K. Barnett Mayor of Rochester Hills, MI President Greg Fischer Mayor of Louisville Vice President Nan Whaley Mayor of Dayton Second Vice President Tom Cochran CEO and Executive Director The U.S. Conference of Mayors Bob Perciasepe President The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions About the U.S. Conference of Mayors: The U.S. Conference About C2ES: The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions of Mayors is the official nonpartisan organization of cities (C2ES) is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization with populations of 30,000 or more. There are nearly working to forge practical solutions to climate change. Our 1,400 such cities in the country today, and each city mission is to advance strong policy and action to reduce is represented in the Conference by its chief elected greenhouse gas emissions, promote clean energy, and strengthen official, the mayor. Learn more at www.usmayors.org resilience to climate impacts. Learn more at www.c2es.org Acknowledgement The Alliance for a Sustainable Future would like to thank AECOM for leading the development of this report. We would also like to thank Commonwealth Edison (ComEd), the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and Duke Energy for their work in developing these case studies. Thank you as well to the cities of Asheville, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, and Salt Lake City as well as Buncombe County for their contributions to this report. Please note that none of the views of the report necessarily reflect the views of these organizations. The U.S. Conference of Mayors and C2ES are solely responsible for the content of this report. American Mayors and Businesses: Building Partnerships for a Low-Carbon Future Volume III ALLIANCE FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE a joint effort by The U.S. Conference of Mayors and the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) January 2020 Introduction 7 Chicago & ComEd: Leveraging Utility Investments in a Community of the Future 13 Detroit & DTE Energy: Advancing Electrification & Sustainability in Detroit 23 Los Angeles & Los Angeles Department of Water and Power: LA Commits to CONTENTS 100% Clean Energy 31 Salt Lake City & Rocky Mountain Power: A Partnership for a Carbon Negative Future 43 Alliance for a Sustainable Future Introduction Cities across the country are increasingly reach 100% renewable energy for municipal interested in partnerships to advance buildings by 2025 to Salt Lake City’s energy efficiency, renewable energy sources, goal to reach 100% municipal renewable and low-carbon mobility. Collaborative energy supply by 2032, the undertakings partnerships between cities and utilities are significant, and cities have found serve as opportunities to advance these themselves working with their communities goals and can lay the foundation for clean and utilities to accomplish their goals. Time energy solution implementation, policy and time again, these partnerships have change, and community engagement. been instrumental in enabling communities Through collaboration, cities and utilities to meet their climate targets and spur can leverage a diverse set of resources and development for a clean energy future. connections to take a holistic approach in addressing climate issues that satisfy The Alliance for a Sustainable Future, a community needs, increase resource collaboration between the U.S. Conference access, create supportive regulatory of Mayors (USCM) and the Center for environments, and help utilities grow. Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES), has captured a collection of case studies To reach these goals, more than 60% of to demonstrate the impact of city- cities that responded to the 2018 Survey of utility partnerships on addressing the Mayors1 launched or significantly expanded growing impacts of climate change and a climate initiative or policy in the past two promoting collaboration. From different years. The actions are a concerted effort regulatory environments to different on the part of local government to address community priorities, each city-utility the challenges their cities are experiencing partnership has a unique story. However, related to climate impacts: In the past 5 they all demonstrate a commitment to years, 95% of American cities surveyed have improving their communities through experienced a change related to at least innovative collaborative efforts. one climate impact. From Chicago’s goal to 1. Alliance for a Sustainable Future. 2018. Mayors Leading the Way on Climate. www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2018/09/mayors-leading-way-on-climate-2018.pdf. 7 Alliance for a Sustainable Future This portfolio of case studies features 1. How are these collaborative efforts highly effective city-utility partnerships tackling clean energy and transportation that have and will continue to acceler- issues? ate clean energy, transportation elec- trification, and climate action in their 2. What approaches are replicable and communities. This case study collection accelerate success? features the following four partnerships: 3. How are equity, workforce development, 1. Chicago & Commonwealth Edison and resilience goals woven into the (ComEd): Leveraging Utility Investments collaborations? in a Community of the Future These case studies were selected to provide examples of partnerships 2. Detroit & DTE Energy (DTE): Advancing between both small and large cities Electrification & Sustainability in Detroit and municipally-owned utilities (MOUs) 3. Los Angeles (LA) & Los Angeles and investor-owned utilities (IOUs) in a Department of Water and Power variety of geographies and regulatory environments. They demonstrate how city (LADWP): LA Commits to 100% Clean governments and utilities are implementing Energy renewable energy, energy efficiency, grid 4. Salt Lake City & Rocky Mountain Power: modernization, and mobility electrification A Partnership for a Carbon Negative initiatives to drive positive community Future change and progress towards city targets. The purpose of this collection of case studies is to give both cities and utilities an overview of partnerships that have been beneficial in advancing sustain- ability goals and how these partnerships are created and evolve. The case stud- ies address the following questions: 8 Alliance for a Sustainable Future Establishing Measures of Success: Targeted commitments to improving climate outcomes City Target Chicago Reduce GHG emissions by 80% by 2050 from a 1990 baseline Reach 100% renewable energy for municipal buildings by 2025 Reach 100% renewable energy for all buildings by 2035 Detroit Reduce community-wide GHG emissions by 30% by 2025 from a 2012 baseline Reduce municipal GHG emissions by 35% by 2024 and 75% by 2034 from a 2012 baseline Increase solar generation capacity to 10 MW by 2029 Los Angeles Reach 55% renewable energy by 2025 Reach 80% renewable energy by 2036 Lead CA to 100% renewable energy by 2045 Salt Lake City Climate Positive 2040: 100 X 2032: 100% Renewable energy for community electricity supply by 2032 - Goal includes 50% renewable electricity for municipal operations by 2020 80% Reduction in community greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 2040, compared to 2009 baseline - Goal includes at least 50% reduction in community footprint by 2030 9 Alliance for a Sustainable Future In developing this document, USCM, establishment of clear targets and C2ES, AECOM, the Institute of Electrical metrics for success is necessary for city- and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and utility partnerships to track progress and ComEd interviewed each city-utility identify areas for improvement. Metrics partnership to gain a better understanding can also be shared with stakeholders of how partnerships are developed and ensure progress towards goals. and executed, enabling factors and challenges, impacts of efforts, lessons Partnering with Diverse Stakeholders: learned, and keys for project replication. Working with a diverse set of stakeholders is key for city-utility partnerships to implement While each case study represents unique successful initiatives. This includes working lessons learned, there were also several key across city and utility departments to break themes that cut across successful city-utility down silos as well as collaborating with partnerships. The following themes were a wide-range of external stakeholders. keys to success across the four case studies. Collaboration with groups such as non- profit organizations, local businesses, community leaders, education institutions, Keys to Success health institutions, and technical experts Laying the Groundwork: The city, enables partnerships to take a holistic utility, and key stakeholders all play an approach, develop a shared vision, and important role in laying the groundwork for leverage a variety of technical and financial partnership success. In some cases, city- resources for planning and implementation. utility partners should focus on gaining local government support and experience Listening to Community Feedback: from pilot projects before kicking off Ongoing community engagement drives their partnership efforts. In other cases, long-term support for city-utility initiatives. movement building and advocacy efforts These partnerships thrive when they not from all partners and stakeholders
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Destroy Every Closet Door” -Harvey Milk
    “Destroy Every Closet Door” -Harvey Milk Riya Kalra Junior Division Individual Exhibit Student-composed words: 499 Process paper: 500 Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources: Black, Jason E., and Charles E. Morris, compilers. An Archive of Hope: Harvey Milk's Speeches and Writings. University of California Press, 2013. This book is a compilation of Harvey Milk's speeches and interviews throughout his time in California. These interviews describe his views on the community and provide an idea as to what type of person he was. This book helped me because it gave me direct quotes from him and allowed me to clearly understand exactly what his perspective was on major issues. Board of Supervisors in January 8, 1978. City and County of San Francisco, sfbos.org/inauguration. Accessed 2 Jan. 2019. This image is of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors from the time Harvey Milk was a supervisor. This image shows the people who were on the board with him. This helped my project because it gave a visual of many of the key people in the story of Harvey Milk. Braley, Colin E. Sharice Davids at a Victory Party. NBC, 6 Nov. 2018, www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/sharice-davids-lesbian-native-american-makes- political-history-kansas-n933211. Accessed 2 May 2019. This is an image of Sharcie Davids at a victory party after she was elected to congress in Kansas. This image helped me because ti provided a face to go with he quote that I used on my impact section of board. California State, Legislature, Senate. Proposition 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Deborah L. Rhode* This Article Explores the Leadership Challenges That Arose in the Wake of the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic and the W
    9 RHODE (DO NOT DELETE) 5/26/2021 9:12 AM LEADERSHIP IN TIMES OF SOCIAL UPHEAVAL: LESSONS FOR LAWYERS Deborah L. Rhode* This article explores the leadership challenges that arose in the wake of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and the widespread protests following the killing of an unarmed Black man, George Floyd. Lawyers have been key players in both crises, as politicians, general counsel, and leaders of protest movements, law firms, bar associations, and law enforcement agencies. Their successes and failures hold broader lessons for the profession generally. Even before the tumultuous spring of 2020, two-thirds of the public thought that the nation had a leadership crisis. The performance of leaders in the pandemic and the unrest following Floyd’s death suggests why. The article proceeds in three parts. Part I explores leadership challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and the missteps that put millions of lives and livelihoods as risk. It begins by noting the increasing frequency and intensity of disasters, and the way that leadership failures in one arena—health, environmental, political, or socioeconomic—can have cascading effects in others. Discussion then summarizes key leadership attributes in preventing, addressing, and drawing policy lessons from major crises. Particular attention centers on the changes in legal workplaces that the lockdown spurred, and which ones should be retained going forward. Analysis also centers on gendered differences in the way that leaders addressed the pandemic and what those differences suggest about effective leadership generally. Part II examines leadership challenges in the wake of Floyd’s death for lawyers in social movements, political positions, private organizations, and bar associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Responses to a Global Pandemic: Women Mayors Lead the Way Kendall D
    Politics & Gender, (2020), page 1 of 7 Local Responses to a Global Pandemic: Women Mayors Lead the Way Kendall D. Funk Arizona State University Even before the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, was declared a pandemic, prominent women mayors in the United States enacted proactive and innovative policies to prevent local outbreaks and soften the social and economic repercussions. Several Black women mayors, in particular, have led the way in local pandemic response efforts. This article identifies four major features of these and other women mayors’ early responses. First, women mayors demonstrated proactive leadership even when faced with pushback. Second, these mayors advocated for transparent and evidence-based decision-making at all levels of government. Third, they enacted measures to protect vulnerable communities and reduce disparities. Fourth, they actively shared advice on best practices and lessons learned, and provided examples for other local leaders to follow. The article concludes by situating these responses in the larger research on gender and leadership and asks whether these women’s actions are unique or part of a systematic trend of gendered responses to the pandemic. Keywords: COVID-19, local government, women’s representation, policy priorities hen the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a W pandemic in March 2020, the U.S. federal government did little to stymie the virus’s spread. Several subnational governments, however, responded quickly. Among those leading the way in response efforts are women mayors (Dittmar 2020). Several Black women mayors in particular, including San Francisco mayor London Breed, Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot, and Atlanta mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, have demonstrated remarkable leadership and ingenuity.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Conference of Mayors 2020 Report.Pdf
    United States Conference of Mayors 2020 January 22-24, 2020 Overview ▪ Mayor Frank Scarpitti was asked by FCM to represent Canadian Mayors at annual USCM Winter Meeting. ▪ USCM Winter Meeting brings together 300 mayors (cities of 30,000+) from across United States for workshops and presentations. ▪ Mayor Scarpitti was asked by FCM to promote partnership of FCM and USCM and highlight the significance of ratifying the new NAFTA to ensure stability of trade between Canada and United States. ▪ United States is Markham’s largest source of Foreign Direct Investment (60%). Workshops USCM – January 22-24, 2020 Transportation & Communications Technologies - High Speed Rail - Electrification - Electric Vehicles - Public Transit Eric Johnson, Mayor, Dallas Sylvester Turner, Mayor, Houston Sam Liccardo, Mayor, San Jose Infrastructure and the Mayors’ 2020 Vision for America - Tackling US Infrastructure Deficit - Federal Advocacy - Climate Change and Environmental Resiliency - Public Transit Eric Garcetti, Mayor, Los Angeles Michael Hancock, Mayor, Denver Latoya Cantell, Mayor, New Orleans Eliminating Human Trafficking Carolyn Goodman, Mayor, Las Vegas Sylvester Turner, Mayor, Houston Lessons Learned: Preventing, Preparing for, and Responding to Mass Shootings Lori Lightfoot, Mayor, Chicago Buddy Dyer, Mayor, Orlando Christine Hunschofsky, Mayor, Parkland Sam Liccardo, Mayor, San Jose Dee Margo, Mayor, El Paso Bill Peduto, Mayor, Pittsburgh The Rise of E-sports Andy Brick, Principal Conductor and Music Director, GameON! Symphonic Orchestra Jeff Williams,
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing a Security Threat?
    Constructing a Security Threat? Identifying Securitization in US State Level Politics Framing of the BLM Protests Rebecka Bjuremalm Supervisor: Josefina Erikson Bachelor Thesis, Political Science Department of Government Uppsala University, Spring 2021 Word count: 11,723 Page count: 43 Abstract This thesis investigates US state level politics framing of the BLM protests during 2020, by inductively identifying frames and then proceeding to study if and on what grounds securitization occurs in these. Press statements, interviews and documents from eight Mayors and Governors in six of the states where the protests have been the most prominent are analyzed. From this material, four frames have been identified: the alienated outsider frame, the constructive rage frame, the limited guardian frame, and the desecuritizing frame. Recent developments in securitization theory investigate human life and dignity as a reference object, making a case for integrating humanitarianism in terms of grounds for justifying extraordinary measures. Three grounds for securitization are investigated empirically in the identified frames: state, social and humanitarian security. The study concludes that whilst both state security and to a lesser degree humanitarian security are detected in the identified frames, societal security seems to be the most prominent. This suggests that large-scale identities are the most common reference objects in the treated context. Further research is encouraged, especially in terms of distinguishing potential frame alignment processes by looking at a greater number of states over a longer period of time. Key words: securitization, Copenhagen School, framing analysis, protest movements, Black Lives Matter, securitized citizens, contentious politics 2 List of Abbreviations BLM: Black Lives Matter ACLED: The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project PACT: Protecting American Communities Task Force DHS: Department of Homeland Security B.I.E.: Black Identity Extremists IACHR: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 3 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • August 4, 2021 the Honorable Lori Lightfoot Mayor City of Chicago 121
    Jesse Sharkey President Stacy Davis Gates Vice President Christel Williams-Hayes Recording Secretary Maria Moreno August 4, 2021 Financial Secretary Affiliations The Honorable Lori Lightfoot American Federation of Teachers, Illinois Mayor Federation of Teachers, City of Chicago American Federation of 121 N. LaSalle Street, 5th Floor Labor – Congress of Chicago, Illinois 60602 Industrial Organizations, Illinois Federation of Labor – Congress of Dr. Jose Torres Industrial Organizations, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chicago Federation of Labor, Industrial Chicago Public Schools Union Council 42 West Madison Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Maurice Swinney Interim Chief Education Officer Chicago Public Schools 42 West Madison Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Miguel del Valle President Chicago Board of Education 1 N. Dearborn St., #950 Chicago, IL 60602 Members of the Chicago Board of Education Chicago Board of Education 1 N. Dearborn St., #950 Chicago, IL 60602 Chicago Public Schools Bargaining Team Chicago Public Schools 42 West Madison Street Chicago, IL 60602 Dear Mayor Lightfoot, Dr. Torres, Mr. Swinney, President del Valle, Board of Education Members and CPS Bargaining Team: As we prepare for the start of the 2021-2022 school year, it is imperative that we acknowledge the changing dynamics of the COVID-19 virus and the importance of engagement with Chicago Public Schools families and communities. Since presenting our comprehensive proposal to Dr. Torres and the Chicago Board of Education on July 8, 2021, Chicago Teachers Union officers, counsel and rank-and- file educators have held a series of bargaining sessions with senior CPS management and legal representatives. We have made incremental progress, but with less than 30 days until the August 30, 2021, return to classes for our students, we must ensure that all stakeholders in our district are clear on plans and proposals for maximum safety in the upcoming year.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Accountability Task Force Report
    Recommendations for Reform: Restoring Trust between the Chicago Police and the Communities they Serve REPORT April 2016 Police Accountability Task Force | 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................................................iv Glossary of Terms ...............................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................1 The Tipping Point................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Work of the Police Accountability Task Force............................................................................................. 4 Community Engagement ...................................................................................................................................... 5 How did we get to this point? Some Overarching Findings.............................................................................. 6 Other Key Findings By Working Group ............................................................................................................. 13 Recommendations..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 23, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell the Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker United States Senate United
    March 23, 2020 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker United States Senate United States House of Representatives 317 Russell Senate Office Building 1236 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Minority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States House of Representatives 322 Hart Senate Office Building 2468 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Speaker Pelosi, Leader McConnell, Leader McCarthy and Leader Schumer: As Congress works on its next relief package, we are extremely concerned about the significant health risk the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak poses for people experiencing homelessness and on individuals teetering on the edge of homelessness. We strongly urge you to provide $105 billion to state and local entities to protect those who are unhoused and those on the brink from becoming homeless from COVID-19 through the Emergency Solutions Grant Program and rental assistance programs for low-income individuals and families. There are an estimated 568,000 people experiencing homelessness on any given night in America, according to the most recent Annual Homelessness Assessment Report to Congress. This includes 171,670 people in families (including children), 35,038 unaccompanied homeless youth, and 96,141 chronically homeless individuals. We are very concerned because our neighbors experiencing homelessness reside in public spaces and congregate in shelters, where they may have higher exposure to the virus. Further, nationally, people experiencing homelessness have more limited access to the preventive measures recommended by the nation’s health authorities, including, social distancing, home isolation, handwashing, avoiding high-touch surfaces and rapid access to health care.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Continue to Lead During Tough Times
    B12 THE SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE SUNDAY • JUNE 21,2020 APATH FORWARD WOMEN CONTINUE TO LEAD DURING TOUGH TIMES BY STEVEN P. DINKIN Ihave four Black female the city’s police chief. Bot- unions to increase account- curred during the protests, bring to their cities and con- leaders in mind. They are all toms shared the anguish she ability. Breed has already including the burning down stituents a blend of skills: big From pandemics to pro- mayors of large cities: felt watching the video, shifted the duties of officers of the Wendy’s where ideas and pragmatism, ur- tests, it is women who con- Keisha Lance Bottoms of thinking, “Just let him go. in her city so they no longer Rayshard Brooks was shot. gency and resolve, along tinue to flex their leadership Atlanta, Lori Lightfoot of Let him call somebody.” As respond to non-emergency She understands and empa- with a strong desire to lead muscles and demonstrate Chicago, London Breed of Bottoms spoke, it was evi- situations. Bowser wants to thizes with the protesters and take care of people. And their skills as warriors or San Francisco, and Muriel dent that the other mayors invest in and work on police but worries that their mes- they are also informed by healers. Sometimes both. Bowser of Washington, D.C. who had watched the video and community relations. sage will be lost amid the their identity. When coronavirus took All four were featured in a also hoped for a different They all agree: The mayhem. Drawing a con- As Bottoms told the audi- hold, it was countries led by recent CNN town hall, called outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Lori Lightfoot's Wide-Awake Take on the 'Illinois Exodus'
    Lori Lightfoot's wide-awake take on the 'Illinois Exodus' chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-illinois-exodus-population-chicago-cook-20190419- story.html Editorial Board “Population loss hurts us all. This should be the proverbial canary in the mine shaft — Chicago needs a proactive growth strategy. We’ve got to create real opportunities and incentives for businesses and for all neighborhoods to prosper.” — Mayor-elect Lori Lightfoot on the Chicago area’s fourth consecutive year of falling population. ADVERTISING inRead invented by Teads If she keeps talking truth around her fellow Illinois Democrats, Chicago’s next mayor will make them squirm. She must be ignoring the memos instructing her to “Shush up about the ‘Illinois Exodus.’ Bad for our brand.” Lightfoot offered her comment to the Tribune’s Lisa Donovan about U.S. census data showing that the Chicago metro area lost another 22,000 residents from 2017 to 2018. In total numbers and in percentage change, the drop here exceeded comparatively smaller losses in New York and Los Angeles. The new numbers for counties and metropolitan areas combine several factors: births, deaths, in-migration of newcomers from elsewhere in the U.S. or other countries — and, of course, out-migration: the many people who leave here for opportunities in locales with more job growth, less taxation and fewer polar vortexes. One especially troubling footnote in a Tribune news story about the decline: While Cook County’s net migration has been negative for at least 27 years, more people also have left than entered the collar counties, taken together, in every year since 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Sent a Letter
    March 26, 2020 Dr. Steven Dillingham, Ph.D Director United States Census Bureau Washington, DC 20233 Dear Dr. Dillingham: Given the unprecedented events associated with the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, we urge you to extend the Census response deadline beyond its currently scheduled conclusion on August 14, 2020 to September 30, 2020 and authorize United States Census Regional Offices to exercise flexibility in the timeline for enumeration in their respective jurisdictions. As our cities continue to dedicate resources to respond to this outbreak and take strong precautionary measures to ensure social distancing, there will be diminished capacity to administer the Census. A Census count under these circumstances would not only fail to properly account for our current population, particularly our most vulnerable residents, but could also have dire consequences for our communities’ public health. Over the past two years, our cities have worked with thousands of community-based and faith-based organizations to develop a wide array of targeted outreach strategies to educate and motivate residents to respond to the 2020 Census. These outreach strategies heavily rely on direct, face-to-face communication and interaction with residents to encourage participation in the Census and overcome barriers to participation that cause many communities to be historically undercounted. With the mandated cessation of all large gatherings and the imposition of social distancing practices, our cities and partners have had to cancel meetings, workshops, community and neighborhood events, as well as a variety of door-to-door canvassing operations. We know that none of these tried and true outreach methods are possible in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that any Census count that occurs without this outreach will cause an historic and extremely damaging undercount.
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Electoral Board Decisions: 1980-2020 Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago
    Library of Electoral Board Decisions: 1980-2020 Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago Case decisions are sorted by Election Year and Case Number. Revised Jan.1, 2021. Election Objector(s) Candidate Office Objection Case & Decision 1980 Antonovych Defranco State Representative 80-EB-01 Decision 1980 Antonovych Capuzi State Representative 80-EB-02 Decision 1980 Catania Phipps State Representative 80-EB-03 Decision 1980 Catania Burrell State Representative 80-EB-04 Decision 1980 Gilbert Davis U.S. Representative 80-EB-05 Decision 1980 Ziomek Lodico U.S. Representative 80-EB-06 Decision 1980 Farris Blackwood, Jr State Representative 80-EB-07 Decision 1980 Pouncey Martin State Representative 80-EB-08 Decision 1980 Pouncey Strong State Representative 80-EB-09 Decision 1980 Patt Levy State Representative 80-EB-10 Decision 1980 Pouncey Moore State Representative 80-EB-11 Decision 1980 Washington Wallace State Representative 80-EB-12 Decision 1980 Belcastro Antonovych State Representative 80-EB-13 Decision 1980 Serritella Wooden State Representative 80-EB-14 Decision 1980 Belcastro Defranco State Representative 80-EB-15 Decision 1980 Gaines Jackson State Representative 80-EB-16 Decision 1980 Gaines Holloway State Representative 80-EB-17 Decision 1980 Gaines Hall State Representative 80-EB-18 Decision 1980 Parker Wolski Alderman 80-EB-A-1 Decision 1980 Glass Stinson Alderman 80-EB-AB-01 Decision 1980 Glass Carothers Alderman 80-EB-AS-02 Decision 1980 Gaston Barrett Alderman 80-EB-AS-03 Decision 1980 Gaston Shirley Alderman 80-EB-AS-04
    [Show full text]