<<

FRIEND:Flow Regimes from International Experimental and Network Data (Proceedings of the . _ Conference«, October 1993). IAHS Publ. no. 221, 1994. 315

Probable maximum precipitation in the Upper Mountains

O. SCHULZE, R. ROTH & O. PIEPER Institut fur Météorologie mid Klimatologie, Universitàt Hannover, Herrenhàuser str. 2, D-30419 Hannover,

Abstract An investigation of maximum floods in relation to extreme precipitation was made in the Harz Mountains, as part of a study of the safety aspects of reservoir installations. The estimation of probable maximum precipitation has been completed for the area of Clausthal- Zellerfeld and the River. To estimate probable maximum precipi­ tation water contents were maximized. This involved humidity maximiza­ tion using the physical relationship between water content of the atmos­ phere and the surface dewpoint and estimating the maximum possible dewpoint, for each duration and season of the year with a double exponential function (Gumbel function) from a long climatological time series. Looking at a family of maximized extreme events the probable maximum precipitation is finally calculated from the absolute maximum values. The resulting depth-area-duration curves show a characteristic profile with a rapid increase for short precipitations up to 3 h and an asymptotic increase for long events.

INTRODUCTION

In the Harz Mountains many water reservoir installations were constructed for the industry. Although the reservoir installations have been stable for a very long time an investigation of stability was necessary to fulfil new safety aspects. The fundamentals of the new safety aspects are based on an estimation of maximum floods and the connection with probable maximum precipitation (PMP). The probable maximum precipitation is defined as probable maximum depth of precipitation on different areas for different durations. In comparison with other meteorological para­ meters the precipitation field is not continuous. Therefore both statistical analysis and the measurements of precipitation are difficult. Also the procedures for estimating PMP are admittedly inexact, and the results are approximations (WMO, 1973). Bartels et al. (1990) estimates probable maximum precipitation in Germany by applying precipitation at one point to an area. This method does not work very well in areas with strong orographic structures because the result varies on random selection of measurement points (Roth & Schulze, 1991). Another method is the maximization of territorial precipitation using the physical relationship between the depth of precipitation and water content of the atmosphere (Hauck, 1983; Breuer & Kreuels, 1985; Ruhe et al, 1985; WMO, 1986; Roth & Schulze, 1991). In this report the results of a PMP investigation for the area of Clausthal-Zellerfeld and the Oder river in the Mountains are presented. Distinctions are made between the seasons (summer and winter) in the characteristics of PMP time behaviour. 316 O. Schulze et al.

CLUVÎATOLQGICAL SURVEY

The Harz Mountains are the northernmost low mountain range in Germany having strong gradients of topography at the northern edge of the mountains and a mean altitude of 700 m a.m.s.l. (summit is the Mountain, 1142 m a.m.s.L). According to Kôppen's reformed classification of world the Harz Mountains belong to the Temperate Oceanic with the exception of the Brocken Mountain which is part of a Temperate Oceanic Mountain Climate. The dominance of general westerly weather situations is shown in the annual and monthly distribution of wind directions having mainly southwesterly winds in autumn and winter, and westerly winds in spring and summer. In the Upper Harz Mountains the annual mean temperature lies between 5° and 6°C with an amplitude of 16 to 17° Kelvin from the coldest to warmest month. The monthly mean temperature is -2°C in January and 14-15°C in July. The mean annual depth of precipitation increases from 700 mm year"1 at the northern edge of the mountains to 1200-1400 mm year"1 in the Upper Harz Mountains. Due to lee effects the annual depth of precipitation is only 600 mm year"1 southeast of the Upper Harz Mountains (this area is called the Lower Harz Mountains). During the summer semi-annual period (April to September) the depth of precipitation lies between 720 mm year"1 and 840 mm year"1 (Upper Harz Mountains) and 300 mm year"1 to 400 mm year"1 in the Lower Harz Mountains. The depth of precipitation in the winter semi-annual period (October to March) is equivalent to the summer (Hoffmeister & Schnelle, 1945; Miiller-Westermeier, 1990). The months with heaviest precipitation are January and July; the mean number of days with precipitation is 230 at the top of Brocken Mountain, 200 in the Upper Harz Mountains and 180 in the foreland of the Harz Mountains. The portion of days with strong convective precipitation is equivalent to the number of days with thunderstorms. On average, thunderstorms occur on 21 days in the Upper Harz Mountains and on 36 days on top of the Brocken Mountain. The number of days with more than 10 mm depth of precipitation in 24 hours during the year is 41 to 44, i.e. monthly between 3 and 5 days. There are between 66 (Clausthal-Zellerfeld) and 106 (on top of the Brocken Mountain) days with snowfall extending over a period from October to May. On average a third of the snow cover lies longer than one week (Reidat, 1963). Comparison between the seasons shows that in winter, half of all precipitation events occur in connection with strong wind velocities independent of wind direction. In other seasons a third of all precipitation events shows the same characteristic. To sum up it can be said that the Upper Harz Mountains are a with extra­ ordinary heavy precipitation showing the dominant influence of general westerly weather situations through all seasons.

MAXIMIZATION OF PRECIPITATION

Statistical analysis of heavy precipitation, e.g. KOSTRA (Bartels et al, 1990) allows propositions on return period of precipitation events up to 100 years. Since the extra­ polation over three times shows no threshold, only a physically based maximization Probable maximum precipitation in the Upper Harz Mountains 317 . procedure is useful. For estimating probable maximum precipitation, numerical and empirical procedures exist. Using numerical parameters, a simulation of thermodynamic and convective processes has to be done in detail. The empirical procedure establishes a connection between real precipitation events and an area-depth-duration function. The two aims are that the depth of precipitation is an empirical function of the water content of the atmosphere and that during an extreme event all dynamic parameters should be optimized. In this report the empirical procedures are used. Maximization of water contents was done by humidity maximization using the physical relationship between water content and the surface dewpoint and estimating the maximum possible dewpoint for each duration and season with a double exponential function (Gumbel function) from a long climatological time series. To estimate probable maximum precipitation the following steps are taken: - calculation of territorial precipitation (GBNJ; - calculation of maximum monthly water content (PPWm); - calculation of present water content for each event (PPWJ; - maximization of territorial precipitation (GBNm) as a function of time:

GBNm = (PPWm/PPWa) * GBNa (1) - calculation of area-depth-duration function. The two possibilities for determination of territorial precipitation are the arithmetic mean or using the Thiessen polygon method (Thiessen, 1911). The physical connection between water contents of the atmosphere and surface dewpoint is given in equation (2).

H

Waan = M~* }

a = TCI\J6 (6) 318 O. Schuke et al.

It follows for a and /3 in equation (3):

a = ir/cryô and 0 = a(x)-K

RESULTS FOR UPPER HARZ MOUNTAINS

A selection of precipitation events which are characterized by releasing a maximum flood in the Harz Mountains or in the forelands were taken for investigation of probable maximum precipitation. Tonn (1982) analysed maximum precipitation in the Harz Mountains for the period 1909 to 1981 distinguishing between summer and winter. The precipitation stations used are , Altenau, Bad Grand, Rehberger Graben, Riefensbeek and Dammhaus. All events use a time resolution of 15 minutes for every station. The following extreme precipitation events are used: — maximum flood 13/14 January 1948; — maximum flood 25/26 June 1953; — maximum flood 28 to 30 June 1966; — maximum flood 31 July/ 1 August 1967; — maximum flood 11/12 March 1981; — maximum flood 3/4 June 1981; — heavy precipitation 7 to 9 November 1991. In addition, time series of dewpoints (1936 to 1981) are taken from climatological stations of theDeutscher Wetterdienst in Clausthal-Zellerfeld and Braunlage. From these data an estimation of maximum water contents for events up to 24 h has been made using equation (2). Extreme precipitation events are maximized by multiplication of the relationship between maximum possible water contents and the maximum water contents during the present event with the depth of the territorial precipitation. Comparisons between the approximations for Braunlage and Clausthal-Zellerfeld proves that the distribution of water contents in the Upper Harz Mountains is homo­ geneous. Distinguishing between summer and winter semi-annual period, i.e. April to September and October to March, Figs 1 and 2 show the time variability of probable Probable maximum precipitation in the Upper Harz Mountains 319

160-

140-

120-

e loo- c" o .1 80- Q. O 0> ' area: 10km2 / £ 60- I I / 40 •

20 Clausthai Oder

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Duration, hours Fig. 1 Probable maximum precipitation at the of Clausthal and the drainage basin of the Oder river in summer semi-annual period. Depth of precipitation in mm, drainage basin area: 10 km2. maximum precipitation for the plateau of Clausthal-Zellerfeld and the Oder River. Based on the results, the depth-area-duration curves of the probable maximum precipitation for drainage basins up to 10 km2 show a characteristic profile in the summer semi-annual period, which consists of a rapid increase for short precipitation up to 3 h and an asymptotic increase for longer events (Fig. 1), which is equivalent to the winter semi-annual period. Comparing the depth of probable possible precipitation in winter and summer for the area of Clausthal-Zellerfeld the increase up to 3 h is steeper in summer while in winter the increase for longer events is steeper. The drainage basin of the Oder River shows a flatter increase for short events and a steeper one in both semi-annual periods. The differences in curves between the Clausthal-Zellerfeld terrain and the Oder River drainage basin can be explained by the influence of local heavy precipitation on small areas, i.e the local heavy precipitation event on 1 August 1967 with 106 mm precipi­ tation in 24 h taken from pluviometer registration and 140 mm measured nearby (normal pluviometer, station Riefensbeek). Therefore, it is more useful to take the values of Clausthal-Zellerfeld for estimation of probable maximum precipitation in summer time. In detail, the following values apply to areas of 10 km2 on the terrain of Clausthal- Zellerfeld in summer: after 15 min, PMP amounts to 29 mm. After 1 h, 96 mm are possible, and after 3 h 151 mm. Then there is a slight increase up to 162 mm in 24 h. In winter the PMP after 15 min amounts to 25 mm, and 68 mm in 1 h. 108 mm are possible in 3 h and 166 mm as probable maximum precipitation in 24 h (Figs 1 and 2). The transposition of results from Clausthal-Zellerfeld to neighbouring drainage basins in the Upper Harz Mountains is possible with some restrictions. A transposition to the drainage basin of the river reservoir installation (80 km2) has been done using diminishing factors (Verworn & Flender, 1986). In this case the PMP in summer 320 O. Schulze et al.

160-

140-

120-

Ë E 100- c" o

~ 80- Q. O CD

£ 60-

40-

20- Clausthal Oder

2 4 6 8 10 ~\2 TA 16 18 20 22 24

Duration, hours Fig. 2 Probable maximum precipitation at the plateau of Clausthal and the drainage basin of the Oder river in winter semi-annual period. Depth of precipitation in mm, drainage basin area: 10 km2. is 19 mm for 15 min events up to 77 mm in 1 h. A 3 h PMP amounts to 133 mm and increases to 143 mm in 12 h and 152 mm in 24 h. In the winter semi-annual period the following values apply: 15 min PMP amounts to 17 mm, 54 mm in 1 h and 95 mm in 3 h. After 24 h 156 mm is the probable maximum precipitation for the drainage basin of Oker River reservoir installation.

CONCLUSIONS

This report is part of a series of investigations on probable maximum precipitation in Germany and gives the following conclusions: (a) The distribution of maximum water content of the atmosphere in the Upper Harz Mountains is homogenous. The differences in dewpoints with return periods of 100 years are only between 0.5 and 1 "Kelvin comparing Clausthal-Zellerfeld and Braunlage. In addition for longer events the difference decreases. (b) The increase of probable maximum precipitation shows two characteristic phases, first a nearly linear steep rise during the first 3 h of the event and secondly a flat rise for events longer than 3 h up to 24 h. (c) There are differences comparing summer and winter PMP for short events. In summer the depth of PMP increases faster than in winter because of the dominance of convective precipitation events in summer. The 24 h depth of PMP is nearly equivalent in summer and winter, i.e. 162 mm in summer and 166 mm in winter for areas of 10 km2. (d) PMP is connected to special general weather situations (dominance of westerly weather situations). Probable maximum precipitation in the Upper Harz Mountains 321

REFERENCES

Battels, H., Albrecht, F. M. & Guttenberger, J. (1990) SlarkniederschlagshôhenfUr die BundesrepublikDeutschland. KOSTRA 87 - Abschlufibericht (Depth of heavy precipitations in FRG. KOSTRA 87 - final report). publishers, Offenbach am Main. Breuer, L. J. & Kreueïs, R. K. (1985) Berechnung und Prognose des PMP im Emscher- und Lippegebiet (Calculation and forecast of PMP for drainage basin of Emscher River and Lippe River). Emschergenossenschaft und Lippeverband, Ww-Bericht 84/02. . Gumbel, E. J. (1958) Statistics of Extremes. Columbia University Press. New York. Hauck, E. (1983) Beitrâge zur Wahl des Bemessungshochwassersund zum vermutlich groBten Niederschlag (Contribution to the choice of maximum flood and to the probable maximum precipitation). DVWK-Schriften 36. Paul Parey, Hamburg. Hoffmeister, J. & Schnelle, F. (1945) Klimaatlas von Niedersachsen (Climatological Atlas of Lower ). Gerhard Stalling, Oldenburg. Lowery,M. D. & Nash, J. E. (1970) A comparison of methods of fitting the double exponential distribution./. Hydrol. 10, 259-275. Miiller-Westermeier, G. (1990) Klimadaten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Zeitraum 1951-1980 (Climatological data of FRG, time period 1951-1980). Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach am Main. Plate, E. J. (1982) Engineering . Elsevier, Amsterdam. Reidat, R. (1963) Klimadaten fïir Bauwesen und Technik [Niederschlâge] (Climatological data for building trade and technology [precipitation]). Deutscher Wetterdienst, 12 (86). Roth, R. & Schulze, O. (1991) Maximierter Gebietsniederschlag(Probable maximum precipitation). DVWK-Schriften 97. Paul Parey, Hamburg. Ruhe, W. Roth, R. & Tetzlaff, G. (1985) Berechnung des vermutlich grofiten Niederschlages (PMP) im Einzugsgebiet der Môhnetalsperre (Calculation of probable maximum precipitation (PMP) for the drainage basin of MShne River reservoir installation). Inst. f. Météorologie u. Klimatologie, University of Hannover. Tonn, R. (1982) Ungewôhnliche Hochwasser aus dem Harz (Extraordinary maximum floods in the Harz Mountains). N. Arch.f. Nds., Gottingen31(2), 113-125. Verworn, H. R. & Flender, W. (1986) Niederschlagshôhen-Dauer-Flâchenbeziehungen(Depth-area-duration functions). Promet 16(2/3). WMO (1973) Manual for Estimation ofProbable Maximum Precipitation. 332, Report no. 1, lstedn. WMO, Geneva. WMO (1986) Manual for Estimation of Probable Maximum Precipitation. 332, Report no. 1, 2nd edn. WMO, Geneva.