DOCSLIB.ORG

Barbara A. Burr | Personal Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Barbara A. Burr | Personal Profile BARBARA A. BURR | PERSONAL PROFILE Burr Law Firm 1630 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 400 WDC 20009 202.347.9002 (w) | 202.347.9004 (f) [email protected] FAMILY, MEDIATION AND COLLABORATIVE LAW PRACTICE BURR LAW FIRM, Washington, (2005-present) Founder, Collaborative Counsel & Attorney Founding member of small firm specializing in family matters. Represent men, women and children in all aspects of domestic relations law, from divorce and custody to property distribution and financial support. Provide counsel, consultation, advocacy and advice in a variety of settings including collaborative practice, mediation, traditional round-table negotiation and litigation. Primary focus is conflict resolution--emphasizing approaches that balance expertise and experience with sensitivity and compassion—to help clients move forward with their lives in the most positive way possible. Licensed in DC and MD. Collaborative Counsel Developed active Collaborative Practice to help parties with family matters resolve their disputes in a more open, supportive, respectful process with a focus on finding solutions that work for the entire family so that clients can minimize the painful aspects of divorce and family disputes and move forward with their lives as smoothly as possible. Mediator Provides mediation services to clients to resolve family matters including custody, parenting plan development, modification of custody arrangements, divorce issues, property distribution, alimony and child support. Often serves as co-mediator with financial and/or mental health professional providing services tailored to meet the individual needs of the family. COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE CENTER OF WASHINGTON, DC (2010-present) Founded the Collaborative Practice Center of Greater Washington which provides shared meeting and gathering space to a collection of collaborative professionals with individual practices who share a vision of changing and improving the way people resolve disputes. COLLABORATIVE PROJECT OF DC & COLLABORATIVE PROJECT OF MD (2011-present) Developed and run two non-profit organizations that link families of modest means with professionals who provide reduced-fee and free services to resolve family disputes without going to court using the Collaborative Process. THIRD THURSDAYS FREE DIVORCE WORKSHOP (2017-present) Spearheaded taskforce to create a monthly free divorce workshop for the community, called Third Thursdays. Developed curriculum and organized public education effort. LEWIS LAW FIRM, Washington, D.C. (2001-2005) Attorney Represented clients in all aspects of domestic relations law, including divorce, property distribution, support, custody and domestic violence matters. 1 TEACHING & SPEAKING COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE TRAINING INSTITUTE (CPTI) (2008-present) Lead trainer and founding member of a faculty committed to teaching best methods of conflict resolution and Collaborative Practice to professionals across the country. Develop curriculum and conduct trainings in the art and skill of Collaborative Practice, conflict resolution, mediation and interest-based negotiation, ranging from 2 hour to week-long trainings. Topics include Basic Collaborative Practice (Two and Three-Day trainings), Mediation and Interest-Based Negotiation Skills (Thirty-Hour trainings), and a variety of Advanced Collaborative Skill trainings. Family Law Instructor (2001-present) Instruct and present trainings on a variety of issues in the family law field for DC Family Court, at DC Bar and Family Law Section events, national and local conferences, and local radio shows and podcasts. Civil Rights Law and Litigation Skills Instructor (1990-2001) Lectured nationally on civil rights issues and litigation techniques at numerous agencies and conferences, including the Department of Justice, the Department of Health, Human and Social Services, and the ABA. WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, Washington D.C., (2000-2001) Adjunct Professor. Taught housing discrimination law to second and third year law students. PREVIOUS LAW PRACTICE NATIONAL WOMEN’S LAW CENTER, Washington, D.C. (1999-2001) Senior Counsel. Litigated as lead counsel, co-counsel and amicus curiae in the United States Supreme Court, federal appellate and trial courts in individual and class action cases challenging sex discrimination in employment and education. Policy advocacy and coalition work to ensure strong enforcement of sex discrimination laws. Public education and outreach included technical assistance, publications and extensive speaking engagements, including appearances on National Public Radio and Lifetime TV. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION Housing and Civil Enforcement Section, Washington, D.C. (1990-1999) Senior Trial Attorney Litigated approximately 75 civil rights cases in federal district courts throughout the nation on behalf of hundreds of persons whose rights were violated. Specialized in the federal Fair Housing Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Title VI and Public Accommodations Act. Lead counsel in numerous bench and jury trials in individual, “pattern and practice” and class actions. Supervised trial teams of junior attorneys, paralegals and fair housing testing staff. Wrote briefs as amici curiae on novel and challenging civil rights issues. Conducted attorney trainings, coordinated the Division’s participation in inter-departmental task force, served on administrative committees including the Section’s hiring committee. Received Special Commendations for Outstanding Service in 1992 and 1996 and Special Achievement Awards in 1991, 1994 and 1995. 2 US DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, Cleveland, OH (1998-1999) Mediator Served on the Northern District’s panel of Alternative Dispute Resolution neutrals. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, Washington, D.C. (1989-1990) Judicial Law Clerk to Chief Judge Judith W. Rogers EDUCATION Harvard Law School, J.D., 1989 Honors: cum laude University of Washington, B.A., 1984, Major: Accounting Honors: magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, Beta Gamma Sigma BAR MEMBERSHIPS Maryland Bar, admitted 1989 District of Columbia Bar, admitted 1990 Supreme Court of the United States, admitted 1994 AWARDS & ACCOLADES Named one of DC’s Best Lawyers by the WASHINGTONIAN MAGAZINE since 2015. Named as a Super Lawyer since 2009. Consistently named as one of the area’s Best Lawyers and Best Law Firms by US News & World Report and Best Lawyers®. American Bar Foundation, Fellow since 2019. Named as a Top Woman Lawyer in the Northeast in Arrive Magazine, July/August 2011. Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent® level of legal ability. WRITINGS & APPEARANCES Road to Independence, 101 Women’s Journeys to Starting Their Own Law Firm. (Book, Contributing Author.) June 2011. American Bar Association Press. When Divorce is Collaborative Instead of Combative. February 2012. The Hill Rag. Appeared in the news media, including on Women of Vision with Lori Brooks, on WASH-FM, discussing Collaborative Divorce. 3 PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES & CERTIFICATIONS Collaborative Project of DC, Founding Board member (2012 – present) Collaborative Project of Maryland, Founding Board member (2011 – 2014) District of Columbia Academy of Collaborative Professionals, Founding President (2008 - 2009), Treasurer (2009 – 2011), Board member (2011-2015), member (2008 – present) Collaborative Dispute Resolution Professionals, member (2007 - present) Collaborative Practice Training Institute (CPTI), founding member and trainer (2008-present) International Academy of Collaborative Professionals, member, (2007 - present), 11th Annual IACP Forum Host Committee Chair for the Sightseeing and Cultural Opportunities Committee (2010) Women’s Bar Association Foundation, Board member (2010 – 2012) Women’s Bar Association of the District of Columbia, Treasurer (2002-2004), Board Member (2004- 2006), Association Member (1997-1999; 2001 – present) Women’s Bar Association of Maryland, Montgomery Chapter Member (2001 – present) District of Columbia Bar Family Law Section Member (2001 – present) Montgomery County Bar Association Member (2001 – present) Montgomery County Family Law Section Member (2001 – present) American Bar Association Member (2001 – present) American Bar Association Family Law Section Member (2001 – present) Pro Se Divorce Clinic Trainer, D.C. Bar (2001 – 2007) Volunteer Family Law Facilitator, D.C. Bar (2002 – 2016) Certified Public Accountant, 1984-1986 TRAININGS & WORKSHOPS PRESENTED (Selected) Multidisciplinary Introductory Team Training in Collaborative Practice. Multiple occasions with various IACP faculty members. (Two-Day or Three-Day Team Training.) Interest Based Negotiation and Mediation Skills Training (30 Hour and 40 Hour versions). Multiple occasions in Washington, DC area and Lynchburg, Virginia. With Lisa R. Herrick, PhD, Lonnie Broussard, CFP, Deborah May, CPA, Frank Morrison, Esquire. (Multi-Day training for attorneys, mental health and financial professionals in mediation and negotiation skills.) The Non-Compliant Client: How to Work Effectively with Some of Our Most Challenging Clients, October 2017 in Philadelphia, PA at the IACP Forum. With Lisa R. Herrick, PhD. (3 Hour Workshop.) Delving Into the Heart of Conflict: Breaking Barriers in the Midst of Impasse. June 2017 in Dallas, TX. With Lisa R. Herrick, PhD and Lonnie Broussard, CFP, CDFA. (Advanced One-Day Training.) Deep Dive into the Collaborative Process. May 2016 in Charlotte, NC. With Lisa R. Herrick, PhD. (Advanced One-Day Training.) The Power of Introverts. April 2016 in Washington,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parenting Coordination Sample Local Rule
    PARENTING COORDINATION SAMPLE LOCAL RULE Rule 1. Parenting Coordination. Introduction The County Court adopts Rule 1 effective _____________________. 1.01 Definitions As used in this rule: (A) Domestic abuse “Domestic abuse” means a pattern of abusive and controlling behavior that may include physical violence; coercion; threats; intimidation; isolation; or emotional, sexual, or economic abuse. (B) Domestic violence “Domestic violence” has the same meaning as in R.C. 3113.31(A)(1). (C) Parenting coordination “Parenting coordination” means a child-focused dispute resolution process ordered by the Court to assist parties in implementing a parental rights and responsibilities or companionship time order using assessment, education, case management, conflict management, coaching, or decision-making. “Parenting coordination” is not mediation subject to R.C. Chapter 2710, R.C. 3109.052, or Sup.R. 16 nor arbitration subject to R.C. Chapter 2711 or Sup.R. 15. (D) Parenting coordinator “Parenting coordinator” means an individual appointed by the Court to conduct parenting coordination. 1.02 Purpose This rule allows for the resolution of disputes related to parental rights and responsibilities or companionship time orders outside of court. 1.03 Scope The Court may appoint a parenting coordinator upon the filing of a parental rights and responsibilities or companionship time order. 1 1.04 Limitations of Parenting Coordinator A parent coordinator may not determine the following: (A) Whether to grant, modify, or terminate a protection order; (B) The terms and conditions of a protection order; (C) The penalty for violation of a protection order; (D) Changes in the designation of the primary residential parent or legal guardian; (E) Changes in the primary placement of a child.
    [Show full text]
  • Parenting Coordination for High-Conflict Separated Parents
    1 Parenting Coordination for High-Conflict Separated Parents Greg Kovacs, LMFT Upstate Marriage and Family Therapy, PLLC Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist Parenting Coordinator M.S., Marriage and Family Therapy, University of New Hampshire M.Phil.., Child and Family Studies, Syracuse University M.S., Data Analytics, University of Maryland Ph.D., Child and Family Studies, Syracuse University (est. 2021) ⚫ www.gregkovacs.com ⚫ https://www.facebook.com/upstatemft 2 3 Welcome Message At the UMFT Parenting Coordination Program we use the latest research on the effects of high-conflict divorce and separation on children to coordinate with parents, children, attorneys, courts, and other providers to create and enforce a comprehensive and effective coparenting plan Our Vision: We Will Empower Parents To Communicate, Negotiate, And The UMFT Resolve Differences To Help Their Children Thrive Parenting Our Philosophy: Building On The Foundations Of State-of- The-science Research, We Will Always Be Driven To Understand The Complexities Of Couple Coordination And Family Interactions To Help Parents Overcome Challenging Patterns Of Program Thought, Emotion, And Behavior 4 A Non-confidential, Child-centered Process For High-conflict Divorced Parents Parenting A Form Of Dispute Resolution For Parents In Which Mediation Would Be Inappropriate Or Coordination Ineffective Due To High Levels Of Conflict is . Hybrid Role Performed By An Impartial Third Party • High Rates of Litigation and Re-litigation • Parents are Overly Focused On Their Own Needs •
    [Show full text]
  • The Experiences of Parenting Coordinators Working with Couples Engaged in Intimate Partner Violence Ann M
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2017 The experiences of parenting coordinators working with couples engaged in intimate partner violence Ann M. Ordway Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Counseling Psychology Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Counselor Education & Supervision This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Ann Ordway has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Mark Stauffer, Committee Chairperson, Counselor Education and Supervision Faculty Dr. Stacee Reicherzer, Committee Member, Counselor Education and Supervision Faculty Dr. Laura Haddock, University Reviewer, Counselor Education and Supervision Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2017 Abstract Experiences of Parenting Coordinators Working With Couples Engaged in Intimate Partner Violence by Ann M. Ordway MA/EdS, Seton Hall University, 2007 JD, Seton Hall University School of Law, 1990 BA, Seton Hall University, 1987 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Counselor Education and Supervision Walden University April 2017 Abstract In families where parents present with intimate partner violence dynamics, courts routinely impose restraints restricting communications between those parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Statutes Title 43. Marriage and Family
    OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 43. MARRIAGE AND FAMILY §43-1. Marriage defined. ............................................................................................................................... 8 §43-2. Consanguinity. .................................................................................................................................... 8 §43-3. Who may marry. ................................................................................................................................. 8 §43-3.1. Recognition of marriage between persons of same gender prohibited. ....................................... 10 §43-4. License required. ............................................................................................................................... 10 §43-5. Application - Fees - Issuance of license and certificate. ................................................................... 10 §43-5.1. Premarital counseling. ................................................................................................................... 11 §43-6. License - Contents. ............................................................................................................................ 12 §43-7. Solemnization of marriages. ............................................................................................................. 13 §43-7.1. Refusal to solemnize or recognize marriage by religious organization officials - Definitions. ....... 14 §43-8. Endorsement and return of license. ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1- in the United States District Court for the District Of
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KARIM N. JALLAD, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-2843 RONNIE M. BEACH and KATIE B. LECLUYSE, Defendants. MEMORANDUM & ORDER This matter comes before the court upon defendant Katie B. LeCluyse’s Motion to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. 7) and defendant Ronnie M. Beach’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (Doc. 9). I. Background On December 30, 2016, plaintiff Karim N. Jallad filed his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming violations of various rights. The facts of plaintiff’s complaint involve the state court divorce proceedings between plaintiff and his former wife Cyntia Espada. Defendant LeCluyse, a therapist at Behavioral Health Specialists, was hired by plaintiff and Ms. Espada prior to their divorce, to help their minor daughter understand plaintiff’s frequent travel. Plaintiff’s work as a chemistry professor in Kuwait requires frequent travel. During the divorce proceedings, the state court appointed defendant Ronnie M. Beach to act as a parenting coordinator. Plaintiff brings four claims. Count I alleges that defendant Beach violated plaintiff’s fundamental and due process rights by deciding to: suspend plaintiff’s parenting schedule, eliminating two overnight visits with his daughter; -1- shorten plaintiff’s Skype sessions with his daughter to two 20-minute sessions per week; and allowing Ms. Espada to take their daughter to Puerto Rico for one week, and Dallas for five days.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Parenting Coordination
    Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines for Parenting Coordination © 2019 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines for Parenting Coordination Developed by The AFCC Task Force on Parenting Coordination 2017-19 Foreword The Guidelines for Parenting Coordination (“Guidelines”) are the product of the interdisciplinary AFCC Task Force on Parenting Coordination (“Task Force”). These Guidelines build on two previous AFCC task forces, which produced the report, “Parenting Coordination: Implementation Issues”1 and the first set of AFCC Guidelines for Parenting Coordination.2 It is noteworthy that, as the parenting coordination model has been implemented in various jurisdictions, there has been variation in the authority of a parenting coordinator (“PC”), the stage of the legal process when a PC is appointed, the various functions of a PC, the qualifications and training of a PC, and the best practices for the role. In 2017, then AFCC President Annette Burns recognized the need to update the 2005 Guidelines to reflect developments that had occurred worldwide since the Guidelines were first promulgated. She appointed the current Task Force on Parenting Coordination (“Task Force”). Task Force members met monthly via videoconference and in person at AFCC Conferences in Boston, Massachusetts (June 2017), Milwaukee, Wisconsin (November 2017), Washington, D.C. (June 2018) and Denver, Colorado (November 2018). While revising the 2005 Guidelines, the Task Force identified issues in need of exploration: use of technology in parenting coordination; parenting coordination when intimate partner violence (IPV) is an issue; diversity awareness and responsiveness; and, the evolution and impact of legal directives since the emergence of parenting coordination. To inform the process, two subcommittees were formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Section V., Parenting Coordination
    In the Indiana Supreme Court Cause No. 94S00-1602-MS-86 Order Amending Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines Under the authority vested in this Court to provide by rule for the procedure employed in all courts of this state and this Court’s inherent authority to supervise the administration of all courts of this state, Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines are amended by the adoption of Section V as follows (deletions shown by striking and new text shown by underlining): . SECTION V. PARENTING COORDINATION A. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Parenting coordination is a court ordered, child-focused dispute resolution process in which a Parenting Coordinator is appointed to assist high conflict parties by accessing and managing conflicts, redirecting the focus of the parties to the needs of the child, and educating the parties on how to make decisions that are in the best interest of the child. 2. A Parenting Coordinator is an individual appointed by a Court to conduct parenting coordination. 3. “High conflict parties” are parties who have had ongoing disagreements and conflict. The disagreements and conflict center on the parties’ inability to communicate and resolve issues regarding the care of the child, a parenting time schedule, or any other issues that have adversely affected the child. 4. Nothing in this guideline limits, supersedes, or divests the court of its exclusive jurisdiction to determine issues of parenting time, custody, and child support. 5. These guidelines apply to all Parenting Coordinator appointments made after the effective date of the adoption of these guidelines and do not modify an existing parenting coordination order.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Parenting Coordination
    Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines for Parenting Coordination © 2005 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts Guidelines for Parenting Coordination Developed by The AFCC Task Force on Parenting Coordination May 2005 Foreword The Guidelines for Parenting Coordination (“Guidelines”) are the product of the interdisciplinary AFCC Task Force on Parenting Coordination (“Task Force”). First appointed in 2001 by Denise McColley, AFCC President 2001-02, the Task Force originally discussed creating model standards of practice. At that time, however, the Task Force agreed that the role was too new for a comprehensive set of standards. The Task Force instead investigated the issues inherent in the new role and described the manner in which jurisdictions in the United States that have used parenting coordination resolved those issues. The report of the Task Force’s (2001-2003) two- year study was published in April of 2003 as “Parenting Coordination: Implementation Issues.”1 The Task Force was reconstituted in 2003 by Hon. George Czutrin, AFCC President 2003-04. President Czutrin charged the Task Force with developing model standards of practice for parenting coordination for North America and named two Canadian members to the twelve-member task force. The Task Force continued investigating the use of the role in the United States and in Canada and drafted Model Standards for Parenting Coordination after much study, discussion and review of best practices in both the United States and Canada. AFCC posted the Model Standards on its website, afccnet.org, and the TaskForce members also widely distributed them for comments. The Task Force received many thoughtful and articulate comments which were carefully considered in making substantive and editorial changes based upon the feedback that was received.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Court of Common Pleas Family Court Division Stark County, Ohio
    Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Court of Common Pleas Family Court Division Stark County, Ohio STARK COUNTY FAMILY COURT LOCAL RULES OF COURT RULE 9. GENERAL RULE 10. COSTS RULE 11. SERVICE AND NOTICE RULE 12. PLEADINGS AND FILING REQUIREMENTS RULE 13. DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN RULE 14. CONDUCT OF HEARING AND TRIALS RULE 15. MOTIONS RULE 16. ALLOCATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES RULE 17. GUARDIAN AD LITEM RULE 18. CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY (INCLUDING ORDERS WHICH MODIFY PRIOR ORDERS) RULE 19. JUVENILE CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN RULE 20. CIVIL PROTECTION ORDERS RULE 21. MEDIATION RULE 22. JUVENILE COMPETENCY PROCEEDINGS RULE 23 SPECIALIZED DOCKET (DRUG COURT) RULE 24. PARENTING COORDINATION RULE 25. ELECTRONICALLY PRODUCED TICKETS RULE 26. ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS Appendix RULES OF COURT RULE 9 GENERAL 9.01 Name of Division The Domestic Relations and Juvenile Court shall be severally identified as the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio, Family Court Division 9.02 The Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, the Superintendence Rules of the Supreme Court, and the Ohio Rules of Juvenile Procedure shall apply in all actions where applicable. The Rules of the General Division of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas shall apply to all proceedings before this Court, except to the extent that those General Division Rules conflict with these rules, or to the extent that the General Division Rules are inapplicable. RULE 10 COSTS 10.01 A deposit shall be required to secure court costs in all Family Court cases. 10.02 Waiver of Deposit: Waiver of Costs The Court may, by endorsement on the pleading, waive the deposit for costs, upon good cause shown and upon the filing with the Clerk of an affidavit, identifying assets and earnings of the party, together with a statement that counsel has received no fees.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is an Agreement for Parenting Coordination Services
    THIS IS AN AGREEMENT FOR PARENTING COORDINATION SERVICES BETWEEN: FN1 LN1 -and- FN2 LN2 -and- CANADIAN CO-PARENTING CENTRES, CCPC PRINCIPLES 1. The parents, FN1 LN1 and FN2 LN2, acknowledge that child(ren) will benefit from a meaningful relationship with both parents, that parental conflict will impact negatively on the child(ren)'s adjustment and development, and that every effort should be made to keep the child(ren) out of the parent's disputes. 2. Parenting coordination is a child-focused dispute resolution process and the parents agree to voluntarily enter into this Agreement, and to be bound by it, because of a desire to: a) de-escalate parental conflict; b) prioritize the child(ren)'s best interests; c) promote the child(ren)'s optimum adjustment; d) resolve issues/disputes in a timely and cost efficient manner; e) benefit from the direction of a qualified professional. APPOINTMENT OF THE PARENTING COORDINATOR 3. The parents/parties hereby retain the CANADIAN CO-PARENTING CENTRES to provide parenting coordination services, as defined by this agreement, and as described in Schedule "A" of this Agreement, and as generally understood in the professional literature and practice. The Canadian Co-Parenting Centre's primary representative will be FNPC LNPC (the parenting coordinator). (Canadian Co-Parenting Centres, CCPC, is a registered charitable organization and is hereafter referred to as the "Agency".) 4. No party is under any duress or undue influence of the other party and they are voluntarily entering into this Agreement. Each party has had the opportunity to obtain independent legal advice prior to signing this Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Relations Division Local Rules.Pdf
    DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RANDALL D. FULLER, JUDGE Adopted April 10, 2017 Amended October 7, 2018 1 RULE 1 COMPLIANCE WITH OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE .......................................... 7 RULE 2 PLEADINGS, MOTIONS, AND ORDERS ............................................................................. 7 2.01 Form ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.02 Initial filings and affidavits. ...................................................................................................... 8 2.03 Court exhibit file. ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.04 Mutual restraining order. .......................................................................................................... 9 2.05 Case management plan. .......................................................................................................... 10 2.06 Leave to plead. ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.07 Post-decree motions. ............................................................................................................... 11 2.08 Motions and orders. ................................................................................................................ 11 2.09 Notice of Intent to Relocate.
    [Show full text]
  • Superior Court of California, County of Marin
    MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FOR COURT USE ONLY 3501 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 4988 San Rafael, CA 94913-4988 In Re the Marriage of: PETITIONER: and RESPONDENT: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE NUMBER: APPOINTMENT OF PARENTING COORDINATOR PRINCIPLES 1. The parents acknowledge that their child(ren) will benefit from a meaningful relationship with both parents that continued parental conflict will generally negatively impact their child(ren)'s adjustment, and that every effort should be made to keep the child(ren) out of the middle of their parents' disputes and communications. 2. The parents agree voluntarily to enter into this Agreement because of a desire to: a. de-escalate parental conflict to which the child(ren) are exposed b. focus on their child(ren)'s needs and best interests c. promote their child(ren)'s optimum adjustment d. resolve issues and disputes between the parents concerning the clarification, implementation, modification and/or adaptation of the court-ordered parenting plan through the informal process described in this order in a timely and cost efficient manner without litigation e. benefit from the direction of a qualified professional chosen to serve as the Parenting Coordinator 3. Parenting Coordination is a child-focused dispute resolution process that combines parent education, dispute assessment, facilitated negotiations, conflict and communication management, and, when parents are unable to resolve their parenting disputes with the Parenting Coordinator's assistance, recommendations or decision making on issues that are specified in this Stipulation and Order. The ultimate goal is to help parents resolve disputed or difficult issues amicably and efficiently on their own, without having to involve the Parenting Coordinator or the adversarial process.
    [Show full text]