DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring the Ancillary Benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for Air Pollution In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring the Ancillary Benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for Air Pollution In 1 Technical report 93 Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe 2 Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe Prepared by: D.P. van Vuuren*, J. Cofala**, H. Eerens*, R. Oostenrijk, C. Heyes**, Z. Klimont**, M. den Elzen*, M. Amann** (*RIVM, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, The Netherlands, **IIASA, International Institute for Integrated System Analysis, Austria) Project manager: Andreas Barkman, EEA Cover design: Rolf Kuchling, EEA Layout: Brandpunkt A/S Legal notice The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission or other European Communities institutions. Neither the European Environment Agency nor any person or company acting on behalf of the Agency is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). ©EEA, Copenhagen, 2004 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 92-9167-524-5 Printed in Denmark European Environment Agency Kongens Nytorv 6 DK-1050 Copenhagen K Tel. (45) 33 36 71 00 Fax (45) 33 36 71 99 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.eea.eu.int 3 Contents Executive summary . 4 1. Introduction . 9 2. Objective and scope . 11 3. Methodology . 12 3.1. Model framework used . 12 3.2. Description of the models used . 13 3.2.1. The FAIR model . 13 3.2.2. The TIMER model . 13 3.2.3. The RAINS model . 14 3.3. Linking the different models . 15 3.3.1. TIMER and FAIR . 15 3.3.2. TIMER to RAINS . 16 3.4. Comparing control costs from TIMER and RAINS: compatibility of costs calculated by different models . 16 4.The baseline scenario for carbon dioxide emissions and air pollution in Europe for 2010 . 18 4.1. Main assumptions . 18 4.2. Baseline results . 19 4.2.1. Carbon dioxide and air pollutant emissions . 19 4.2.2. Emission control costs . 22 4.2.3. Regional environmental impacts . 22 5. Kyoto scenarios and ancillary benefits for regional air pollution . 24 5.1. Kyoto scenario results . 25 5.1.1. CO2 emissions . 25 5.1.2. Air emissions . 28 5.1.3. Emission control costs . 29 5.1.4. Ecosystem protection . 30 Discussion . 32 Conclusions . 34 References . 36 Annex 1: Country level results . 38 Annex 2: Comparison of projected CO2 baseline emissions with other recent studies . 49 4 Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe Executive summary Many of the traditional air pollutants and on three country groupings/regions: western greenhouse gases have common sources and Europe (WE), central and eastern Europe either separately or jointly they lead to a (CEE) and Russian Federation and western variety of environmental effects on local, countries of eastern Europe, Caucasus and regional and global scales. As a result, central Asia countries (here denoted policies that look at cost-effectiveness and RF & EE). Results for individual countries, as environmental effectiveness of proposed shown in the annexes, are mainly for solutions in an integrated way can be more illustration since analysis of climate policies effective and efficient than policies that only takes place at the regional level. focus on one issue, as integration can prevent inefficient use of resources and Methodology implementation of sub-optimal solutions. Three scenarios for the implementation of Objective/scope Kyoto targets are compared with a baseline scenario for 2010 (without new climate Our objective here is to explore reductions of policies). The three scenarios differ with air pollutant emissions as well as the change regard to the use of the Kyoto mechanism. in control costs and environmental impacts These were developed and explored using a (the potential ’ancillary benefits’) resulting set of linked assessment models developed by from different ways of implementing the RIVM in the Netherlands and IIASA in Kyoto Protocol in Europe, in particular with Austria. The Kyoto Protocol targets have reference to the use of Kyoto mechanisms. been implemented according to the post- The term ’Kyoto mechanisms’ refers here to Marrakech Amendments situation. The three all instruments that, in addition to domestic scenarios have been designed to cover a implementation, parties are allowed to use range of potential ancillary benefits for the under the protocol to achieve their reduction main region investigated. targets. These instruments are: emission trading, joint implementation (JI) and the The baseline scenario describes the clean development mechanism (CDM). The developments in energy use and emissions of results presented have a descriptive ’what-if’ greenhouse gases and regional air pollutants, character and do not intend to be assuming that no new climate policies are prescriptive for any future implementation of implemented. The baseline scenario used in the Kyoto Protocol and air pollution policies. this study is consistent with several other Furthermore, we need to emphasise that all scenarios currently used for European our scenarios concentrate exclusively on the assessments. reduction of CO2 emissions, CO2 being, by far, the most important greenhouse gas. The three climate policy scenarios prepared Possibilities for reducing other gases (CH4, for the report are: N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6) are not considered. 1. domestic action only (DAO): assumes that Kyoto targets are met solely through This technical report underpins the domestic implementation, allowing only information presented in the report for internal emission trading (e.g. within ’Europe’s Environment: the third the EU), assessment’, produced by the European 2. trade — with no use of surplus emission Environment Agency for the ministerial allowances (TNS): assumes full use of the conference held in Kiev, May 2003. Kyoto mechanisms, but without using Compared to the information presented in ‘surplus emission allowances’. These Europe’s Environment: the third assessment this ‘surplus emission allowances’ exist as report provides a more indepth presentation greenhouse gas emissions in many CEE of the used methodology, models and the and RF & EE countries are projected as underlying assumptions. Furthermore this being well below their Kyoto targets, even technical report elaborates on the details of without specific climate policies. Thus, the results. The discussion focuses primarily under this scenario, part of the reduction Executive summary 5 by the parties required to reduce their The DAO (domestic action only) scenario emissions under the Kyoto Protocol results in the most drastic changes in western (i.e. WE) is met by means of emission Europe. Reducing 2010 CO2 emissions from trading, JI and CDM, an increase of 8 % (compared to 1990) to a 3. trade — with surplus emission allowances decrease of 7 % results in decrease of (TWS) also assumes full use of Kyoto primary energy consumption of 7 % with mechanisms, but includes the use of respect to the baseline. However, the use of ‘surplus emission allowances’. This ‘surplus coal in western Europe decreases by 38 % emission allowances’ use is, however, whereas the consumption of oil and gas restricted on the basis of maximising the decreases by 9 % and 2 %, respectively. In revenues of their trade for the CEE and this scenario, no changes occur in the CEE RF & EE regions, leading to the use of only and RF & EE regions compared to baseline, a quarter of the available 'surplus emission since their Kyoto targets are already met allowances' during the first comment under the baseline scenario. period. Under the two ‘emission trading’ scenarios Results (i.e. the scenarios that assume the use of Kyoto mechanisms) part of the necessary Baseline scenario without additional climate emission reductions in WE is implemented policies using more cost-effective measures in other The baseline scenario shows that if no sub-regions. In these cases, obviously less additional climate policies are formulated substantial changes in WE are required, after 2000, CO2 emissions in WE will increase while, at the same time, this leads to changes by 8 % compared to 1990. The projected in the energy system of CEE and RF & EE. increase in CO2 emissions is mainly driven by an increase in energy consumption, which In the TNS scenario (i.e. without the use of for WE in 2010 is about 15 % above the 1990 ‘surplus emission allowances’) total primary level. In contrast, according to the baseline energy consumption in WE decreases by 2 % scenario the 2010 emissions in the CEE and and coal use by 21 % with respect to the RF & EE regions are below the 1990 level. baseline. While consumption of oil decreases (– 10 % and – 32 %, respectively). This 3 %, the use of gas increases simultaneously means that these regions already comply with by the same percentage. Measures that are their respective reduction targets without implemented in CEE and RF & EE cause a additional policies. For all three regions, drop in the primary energy demand in these emissions decrease by 7 % compared to 1990. regions by 4% and 9%, respectively. Again, this is largely due to less use of coal (23 % in For regional air pollutants, the baseline CEE and 32 % in RF & EE). Interestingly, for scenario includes emission and fuel Europe as a whole, the CO2 emission standards in each country according to the reductions are the same as in the DAO current legislation (CLE) (1) and emission scenario (6 % compared to baseline). This is ceilings from the National Emission Ceilings because the limited use of CDM by WE Directive of the EU and the Gothenburg (resulting in measures taken outside Europe) Protocol to the CLRTAP. As a result, is compensated by reductions in CEE and emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen RF & EE as a result of trading with other oxides, volatile organic compounds and Annex-B countries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fact Sheet on the Kyoto Protocol
    The U.S. View FACT SHEET ON THE KYOTO PROTOCOL t a conference held December 1–11, 1997, in Kyoto, Japan, the Parties to A the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change agreed to an historic Protocol to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by harnessing the forces of the global marketplace to protect the environment. Key aspects of the Kyoto Protocol include weather, either of which could spike emissions targets, timetables for industrial- emissions in a particular year. ized nations, and market-based measures for meeting those targets. The Protocol • The first budget period will be makes a down payment on the meaning- 2008–2012. The parties rejected bud- ful participation of developing countries, get periods beginning as early as but more needs to be done in this area. 2003, as neither realistic nor achiev- Securing meaningful developing country able. Having a full decade before the participation remains a core U.S. goal. start of the binding period will allow more time for companies to make the transition to greater energy efficiency Emissions Targets and/or lower carbon technologies. A central feature of the Kyoto Protocol is a set of binding emissions targets for • The emissions targets include all six developed nations. The specific limits major greenhouse gases: carbon diox- vary from country to country, though ide, methane, nitrous oxide, and three those for the key industrial powers of the synthetic substitutes for ozone-deplet- European Union, Japan, and the United ing CFCs that are highly potent and States are similar—8 percent below 1990 long-lasting in the atmosphere. emissions levels for the European Union, 7 percent for the United States, and 6 • Activities that absorb carbon, such as percent for Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions Gap Report 2018 © 2018 United Nations Environment Programme November 2018
    Emissions Gap Report 2018 © 2018 United Nations Environment Programme November 2018 ISBN: 978-92-807-3726-4 Job number: DEW/2210/NA This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UN Environment would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from UN Environment. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Communication Division, UN Environment, P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. For general guidance on matters relating to the use of maps in publications please go to http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/htmain.htm Disclaimers Mention of a commercial company or product in this document does not imply endorsement by UN Environment or the authors. The use of information from this document for publicity or advertising is not permitted. Trademark names and symbols are used in an editorial fashion with no intention on infringement of trademark or copyright laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification
    Ocean acidification: Obligations under international and regional treaty law Candidate number: 8023 Submission deadline: 1 December 2018 Number of words: 17.996 Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION - THE PROBLEM OF OCEAN ACIDIFICATION .................. 1 1.1 Methodology, structure and legal sources used ................................................................ 2 1.2 The science behind ocean acidification and the problems repercussions ......................... 3 1.2.1 Scientific background of ocean acidification ...................................................... 3 1.2.2 Artificial contribution to ocean acidification ...................................................... 4 1.2.3 Consequences of ocean acidification for the ocean as an ecosystem .................. 4 1.2.4 Consequences of ocean acidification on particularly sensitive areas .................. 5 1.2.5 The problem of inconsistent results .................................................................... 6 1.2.6 The effects of ocean acidification on human life ................................................ 6 1.2.7 Implications ......................................................................................................... 7 2 ANALYSIS OF THE OBLIGATIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL TREATY LAW IN REGARD TO OCEAN ACIDIFICATION .................................................. 9 2.1 Ocean acidification under the International Climate Change Regime ............................. 9 2.1.1 The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) ... 9 2.1.2 Kyoto
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change: a Research Brief
    CLIMATE CHANGE: A RESEARCH BRIEF June 2021 Introduction The Centre of Expertise of Global Governance project named “Global Challenges in 365 Days” has come to life. This project aims at creating a database about Global Challenges, to be informed about them, know factual background, and find interesting topics for research. The following briefing provides a historical overview and scientific findings at base level on the global challenge of Climate Change. It also defines the legal grounds of this issue, and finally explores the still unanswered issues that could be of interest for further research. 1. Historical overview The scientific concern regarding the impact of human activities on global climate kept growing in intensity and information overload over the past 100 years. Climate change has always been part of the human evolution, considering ice ages and changes on the planet. Yet due to numerous factors induced by anthropogenic impacts climate changes are happening unnaturally rapid. From the historical perspective, the development of humankind and our activities are tied to our better understanding, and therefore the increasing concern about the evolution of the climate system.1 Reflecting upon climate change and its correlation with the human behaviour brought a gradual, but overwhelming amount of international apprehension from governments, organisations, and general public. The great concern was, and still is, manifested among various historical events and developments. Firstly, the effects of increasing amounts of CO2 atmospheric concentration were taken under serious consideration starting from 19582, and therefore providing, by the mid- 1970', compact and thorough scientific data analysis on the said issue3. The following timeline shows the details on how climate change became more and more important in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation and Life Cycle Co2 Reduction by Installation of Urban Heat Island Countermeasures
    1.6 URBAN HEAT ISLAND MITIGATION AND LIFE CYCLE CO2 REDUCTION BY INSTALLATION OF URBAN HEAT ISLAND COUNTERMEASURES Tomohiko Ihara1*, Yukihiro Kikegawa2, Kazutaka Oka3, Kazuki Yamaguchi4, Yasuyuki Endo4, Yutaka Genchi1 1 National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 2 Meisei University, Hino, Tokyo, Japan 3 Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Inc., Tokyo, Japan 4 Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan 1. INTRODUCTION Achievement Plan in April 2005. In order to meet the * goal, even when UHI countermeasures are installed, it 1.1 Background is required that there should be no significant increase in CO2 emissions. From the viewpoint of global In Japan, the air temperature in big cities has warming, it is very important to evaluate not only been increasing rapidly since the 1980s. This changes in CO2 emissions for air-conditioning demand phenomenon is referred to as the “urban heat island of the building by UHI countermeasures but also (UHI) phenomenon.” UHI is an environmental problem increases in CO2 emissions for the construction and that results in increases in energy consumption due to the operation of UHI countermeasures. the increased cooling demand, and in unfavorable conditions for human health. Various local activities 1.2 Objectives against UHI have been promoted after the enactment of the Outline of Countermeasures to Urban Heat This study evaluated both the changes in the Island in March 2004. urban air temperature and life cycle CO2 (LCCO2) Many countermeasures against UHI have been emissions resulting from the installation of various UHI developed so far in order to decrease the air countermeasures.
    [Show full text]
  • French Climate Plan
    ECOLOGY, ENERGY, MINISTER'S JOURNAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT November 2009 & THE SEA French Climate Plan Implementation of Policies and Adapting to Climate the Environment Measures: Change: Round Table: All Sectors are Four Major Conclusions Ambitious Objectives to Affected, p. 8 and a National Strategy, Stop Climate Change, p. 4 p. 23 Climate Plan 03 Editorial n Copenhagen, leaders of 192 countries will meet in an attempt to seek a climate agreement to follow of the Kyoto Protocol. The objective is to limit temperature increase to 2°C maximum, a threshold beyond which the world would enter a period of strong climactic uncertainty. ITo achieve this, we must have precise objectives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions over the short, medium and long terms. France is thus campaigning, on the basis of research conducted by scientists at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for a reduction in developed countries' emissions of between 25% and 40% by 2020 and a 50% reduction in world emissions by 2050. France, which is already one of the only countries in the world to comply with the Kyoto Protocol, has chosen, in the framework of the Environment Round Table (Grenelle), to set an example by planning a 75% reduction in its carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. For more than two years and by mobilising of all sectors, France is intensively investing in a new green growth model based on restraint in carbon and energy consumption: almost unanimous adoption of the “Grenelle 1 Act”, 800 million euros in assistance for building 50 public transports projects in 38 metropolitan areas in France, creation of an ecological loan at zero percent with already more than 50,000 energy-efficiency improvements made by private individuals, a request for proposals for building at least one solar power plant per region by 2011, cutting by half within two years the time for connection to the electricity grid for solar energy, passage of an ecological bonus for automobiles, launch of a clean vehicle plan, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Kyoto Protocol on CO2 Emissions: a Five-Country Rolling Regression Analysis
    sustainability Article Effects of Kyoto Protocol on CO2 Emissions: A Five-Country Rolling Regression Analysis Chien-Ho Wang 1, Ming-Hui Ko 2 and Wan-Jiun Chen 2,* 1 Department of Economics, National Taipei University, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Department of Economics, Chinese Culture University, Taipei 111, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-2861-0511 (ext. 29326) Received: 23 December 2018; Accepted: 29 January 2019; Published: 31 January 2019 Abstract: The current study illustrated the time variance of turning points in the relationship between carbon emissions and income to resolve heated debate on the different responsibility to climate change with 1950–2010 data of five development diversity countries—three developed countries (Germany, Italy, and Japan) and one developing country (India) and one newly industrialized economy (Taiwan). The article also examines the impact of the crisis on emission. The time-varying patterns in the turning points on environmental Kuznets curves (EKCs) were observed by a rolling regression technique with 1950–2010 data regarding the per capita CO2 emissions caused by fossil fuel combustion and the incomes of the countries. Several empirical findings were revealed from this analysis. Per capita CO2 emissions commonly decreased with varying magnitudes in the five countries over time. The EKC hypothesis regarding the CO2 emissions is affirmed again in this study. The announcement effects associated with the Kyoto Protocol was evidenced. As indicated by the occurring GDP of the turning point, there is a strong reduction trend in the income level of the turning points right before the years of Kyoto Protocol; and this decreasing trend nearly ended as the Kyoto protocol approached its end, except in Germany, where the occurring income of the turning points continued to have a decreasing trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Democracies Exit International Agreements? the Role Of
    Why Do Democracies Exit International Agreements? The Role of Information in International Cooperation on Climate Change∗ Patrick Bayery September 29, 2012 Abstract In December 2011, the Canadian government decided to officially withdraw from the Kyoto Proto- col on climate change. While this decision has been expected by some negotiators and policy-makers, it poses an interesting question for political-economic theories of international cooperation: Why do gov- ernments exit international agreements that they previously committed to on a voluntary basis? Without a supranational enforcement power at the international level, no country can be forced to participate in an international treaty, and agreements must be self-enforcing. However, international cooperation becomes vulnerable to withdrawal as soon as governments and, even more so, domestic electorates learn about the true benefits from cooperation. While cooperation may be a reasonable choice ex ante, this may change after an informational shock occurs. When payoff uncertainty disappears, ex post cooperation benefits may be much lower than they were initially believed to be. With highly skewed benefit distributions, countries at the lower end of the distribution are suddenly better off as free-riders. If voters know about this benefit distribution, they back their national governments in exiting international agreements. This theory rationalizes the Canadian government’s behavior with the Kyoto Protocol. ∗I would like to thank Thomas König for comments on a previous draft. yCorresponding
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification: Falling Between the Legal Cracks of UNCLOS and the UNFCCC?
    ORAL FINAL ELQ 45.1.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 9/9/18 9:51 AM Ocean Acidification: Falling Between the Legal Cracks of UNCLOS and the UNFCCC? Nilufer Oral* Oceans have played a critical role in shielding Earth from some of the more serious impacts of climate change by absorbing approximately 30 percent of emitted anthropogenic carbon dioxide. However, this has resulted in an approximate 26 percent increase in acidity of oceans since the industrial period. This not only presents the scientific challenge of addressing the problem of ocean acidification and its impacts on ocean marine life, but also presents many legal challenges. This Article will assess if the existing international legal framework provides the necessary foundation to address these legal challenges. Specifically, this Article will analyze whether two key global regimes, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, provide the necessary legal foundation to address ocean acidification. It concludes that while UNCLOS establishes the legal obligation of States to address ocean acidification, it does not by itself provide for the framework for taking the collective action needed for a significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. By contrast, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change regime appears to provide a better vehicle for the collective action necessary to mitigate emissions of carbon dioxide causing ocean acidification. Introduction ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GHG Protocol: Required Greenhouse Gases in Inventories
    Required Greenhouse Gases in Inventories Accounting and Reporting Standard Amendment February, 2013 Table of Contents Amendments 1 Frequently Asked Questions 4 Appendix: Background Information 5 Required greenhouse gases for inclusion in corporate and product life cycle inventories This Accounting Note amends requirements regarding the greenhouse gases (GHGs) to include in inventories, as well as how the emissions of those GHGs should be reported within inventories. These requirements supersede those in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition (2004; ‘Corporate Standard’); Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (2011; ‘Scope 3 Standard’); Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard (2011, ‘Product Standard’); and all associated sectoral guidance published until 2012. A note on terminology in GHG Protocol Standards The GHG Protocol uses specific terms to connote reporting requirements and recommendations. The term “shall” is used to indicate what is required for a GHG inventory to conform to a given Standard. The term “should” is used to indicate a recommendation, but not a requirement. The term “may” is used to indicate an option that is permissible or allowable. Within the guidance sections of each Standard, the term “required” is used to refer to “shall” statements given elsewhere in the standard. Accounting and Reporting Standard Amendment: Required Greenhouse Gases in Inventories Amendments 1. When using the Corporate Standard, Scope 3 Standard, Product Standard, or any associated sectoral guidance (collectively termed ‘Standards’ in this Amendment), companies: a. Shall account for and report the emissions of all the GHGs required by the UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol at the time the corporate or product inventory is being compiled.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification and Climate Change: Synergies and Challenges
    n synthesis 5 Ocean acidification and climate change: synergies and challenges of addressing both under the UNFCCC ELLYCIA R. HARROULD-KOLIEB1, DOROTHE´E HERR2* 1 10 School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia 2 Global Marine and Polar Programme, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Suite 300, 1630 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA 15 Ocean acidification and climate change are linked by their common driver: CO2. Climate change is the consequence of a range of GHG emissions, but ocean acidification on a global scale is caused solely by increased concentrations of atmospheric CO2. Reducing CO2 emissions is therefore the most effective way to mitigate ocean acidification. Acting to prevent further ocean acidification by reducing CO2 emissions will also provide simultaneous benefits by alleviating future climate change. Although it is possible that reducing CO2 emissions to a level low enough to address ocean acidification will simultaneously address climate change, the reverse is unfortunately not necessarily true. Despite the ocean’s integral role in the climate system and the 20 potentially wide-ranging impacts on marine life and humans, the problem of ocean acidification is largely absent from most policy discussions pertaining to CO2 emissions. The linkages between ocean acidification, climate change and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are identified and possible scenarios for developing common solutions to reduce and adapt to ocean acidification and climate change are offered. Areas where the UNFCCC is currently lacking capacity to effectively tackle rising ocean acidity are also highlighted. 25 Keywords: climate change; climate policy; ocean acidification; oceans; UNFCCC L’acidification des oce´ans et le changement climatique sont lie´s par leur cause commune : le CO2.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing and the Kyoto Protocol: a Review of Available and Future Technology for Monitoring Treaty Compliance
    Remote Sensing and the Kyoto Protocol: A Review of Available and Future Technology for Monitoring Treaty Compliance Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, October 20-22, 1999 Workshop Report Edited by: Å. Rosenqvist, M. Imhoff, A. Milne and C. Dobson Remote Sensing and the Kyoto Protocol: A Review of Available and Future Technology for Monitoring Treaty Compliance Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, October 20-22, 1999 The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing - ISPRS Working Groups on Global Monitoring (VII/5) and Radar Applications (VII/6) in collaboration with the University of Michigan Organizers and Editorial Panel: Åke Rosenqvist, ISPRS WG VII/5 (European Commission - DG JRC) [email protected] / [email protected] Marc Imhoff, ISPRS WG VII/5 (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) [email protected] Anthony Milne, ISPRS WG VII/6 (University of New South Wales) [email protected] Craig Dobson (University of Michigan) [email protected] Panel speakers and/or report contributors: Frank Ahern, Canada Centre for Remote Sensing Alan Belward, European Commission - DG JRC Ralph Dubayah, University of Maryland Alfred de Gier, ITC Richard Lucas, University of New South Wales Steven Mirmina, NASA HQ, Office of General Counsel Jiaguo Qi, Michigan State University Dan Reifsnyder, U.S. State Department Paul Siqueira, Jet Propulsion Laboratory David Skole, Michigan State University John Townshend, University of Maryland Philip Tickle, Australian Bureau of Rural Sciences Robert Treuhaft, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Compton Tucker, University of Maryland Lars Ulander, Swedish Defence Research Establishment Thomas Wagner, University of Michigan Diane Wickland, NASA HQ, Terrestrial Ecology Remote Sensing and the Kyoto Protocol: A Review of Available and Future Technology for Monitoring Treaty Compliance Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
    [Show full text]