DOCSLIB.ORG

Descendants of Addison and Elinor Butt of Virginia and Kentucky

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Descendants of Addison and Elinor Butt of Virginia and Kentucky DESCENDANTS OF ADDISON AND ELINOR BUTT OF VIRGINIA AND KENTUCKY Thomas King Butt Richmond, California March 1, 2004 The Descendants of Addison Butt and Elinor Glenn Page 2 03/01/04 7:36 AM Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................... 2 Butts and Glenns in Botetourt County, Virginia................................................................. 2 Settlement of Botetourt County ...................................................................................... 2 Marriage – Addison and Elinor....................................................................................... 2 Children Born in Virginia ............................................................................................... 2 Sara ............................................................................................................................. 2 William ....................................................................................................................... 2 Relocation to Kentucky....................................................................................................... 2 Children Born in Kentucky............................................................................................. 2 Thomas........................................................................................................................ 2 Nancy .......................................................................................................................... 2 Reuben ........................................................................................................................ 2 Delila........................................................................................................................... 2 Archibald..................................................................................................................... 2 Addison Butt Land Transactions in Kentucky................................................................ 2 Death of Addison Butt and Settlement of Estate ............................................................ 2 APPENDIX A - BOTETOURT COUNTY BUTTS .......................................................... 2 APPENDIX B - BOTETOURT COUNTY GLENNS........................................................ 2 APPENDIX C – SARA BUTT LINE................................................................................. 2 APPENDIX D – WILLIAM BUTT LINE.......................................................................... 2 APPENDIX E – THOMAS BUTT LINE........................................................................... 2 APPENDIX F – NANCY BUTT LINE.............................................................................. 2 APPENDIX G – REUBEN BUTT LINE ........................................................................... 2 APPENDIX H – DELILA BUTT LINE............................................................................. 2 APPENDIX I – ARCHIBALD BUTT LINE...................................................................... 2 The Descendants of Addison Butt and Elinor Glenn Page 3 03/01/04 7:36 AM Introduction Addison Butt1 (about 1782-1844) and Elinor Glenn2 (exact birth and death date unknown) were my great- great-great grandparents. They were married in Botetourt County, Virginia in 1802 or 1803, and migrated to Pulaski County, Kentucky, about 1806. This is a record of what is known about them and their descendants. Butts and Glenns in Botetourt County, Virginia It is not clear who Addison’s parents were or where they came from. The best speculation is that they migrated south through the Valley of Virginia (Shenandoah Valley) from the vicinity of Berkeley County (now West Virginia) and Washington County, Maryland, near Harper’s Ferry. There were several Butt and Glenn families in Botetourt County around the turn of the 19th century, but there are no records that decisively connect them to Addison and Elinor. There are, however, some tantalizing references to an Elinor Glen in Botetourt County records. No Butt researcher of whom I am aware has been able to determine where the Botetourt Butts originated. See Appendices A and B for information on Botetourt County Butts and Glenns. The information available on Elinor’s family seems to indicate that they migrated from Ireland in the late 1700’s. Her parents later moved to Green County, Ohio, where they died around 1818. Berkeley County, WV Botetourt County Norfolk Washington County Figure 1 Modern Virginia Counties 1 Spelled variously Addison, Adison, Adderson, Atterson, Anderson, etc. 2 Spelled variously Eleanor, Elendar; Ellendar -- Glen and Glenn The Descendants of Addison Butt and Elinor Glenn Page 4 03/01/04 7:36 AM Settlement of Botetourt County When European settlers came to the Valley of Virginia, they advanced chiefly from Pennsylvania and Maryland up the Valley from its northern end rather than through the eastern elevated gaps, often called the “wind gaps.” The first records are by John Lederer, a German explorer who toured the Valley in 1669 and 1670. The first substantial settlement of what is now Botetourt County did not begin until about 1730. In the late 1730’s and early 1740’s pioneers were beginning to trickle in.3 Botetourt County was the next step up the Great Valley of Virginia for the Scotch-Irish Presbyterians who, after leaving Ireland and landing on the Atlantic Coast ports filtered down from Pennsylvania and Maryland. Most crossed the Potomac River and came up the Valley, which was settled chiefly by Germans and Scotch-Irish. Generally speaking, the Germans came first in the northern end of the Valley, and the Scotch-Irish came first to Botetourt.4 The first meeting of the founding fathers of Botetourt was held February 13, 1770, near what is now Daleville. Court was held at Miller’s Mill (now Fincastle) apparently for the first time on April 10, 1770. In 1794, the Botetourt County Virginia Personal Property Tax List5 listed 782 white males 16 and over. Census data compiled by the Library of Virginia shows 2,247 white males over 16 in 17906 and a 1790 total population of 10,524.7 By 1800, the population was 10,422. In 1810, the Botetourt population was 13,301 with 2,275 slaves.8 By 1860, it had dwindled to 11,516.9 There is no record of a Butt in Botetourt County until 1789, when a 1789 List of Delinquents Returned by John Craig Deputy Sheriff 10 lists a Coonrod or Conrod Butt and John Butt. 11 The first record of a Butt owning or purchasing land in Botetourt occurs in 1804. Deed Book 8, Page 377, shows Jacob Butt buying from John Jordan (and Catherine, his wife) 40 acres on the east side of the James River, adjacent to land of Jacob Leamon. Also in 1804, Deed Book 8, Page 433, John Butt (& Elizabeth, his wife) buying from Joseph (and Margaret) Day 90 ¾ acres on the Mud Lick Branch of Roanoke River, part of 1,380 acres granted to James Neely (Nielly?) 1786, conveyed to Evan Day June 7,1794, conveyed to Joseph Day, February 19,1802. There is no documentation that connects Conrod Butt, John Butt or Jacob Butt with Addison Butt. Marriage – Addison and Elinor The first and only record of Addison and Elinor in Botetourt County, VA is their marriage. On May 19, 1802, a marriage bond was executed for the marriage of Addison Butt and Eleanor Glenn in Botetourt Co, Virginia, also reported by the Methodist Minister John Helms in the minister’s return dated April 1803. See pages 5 and 6 for the Minister’s Return and the Marriage Bond.12 The marriage bond was signed by James 3 Robert Douthat Stoner, A Seed Bed of the Republic (Kingsport, TN: Kingsport Press, Inc., 1962)11-22 4 Ibid, 22 5 http://www.ls.net/~newriver/va/bot1794.htm 6 http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/censusbin/census/cen.pl 7 http://www.virginiaplaces.org/population/pop1790numbers.html 8 http://www.virginiaplaces.org/population/pop1810numbers.html 9 http://www.virginiaplaces.org/population/pop1860numbers.html 10 Botetourt County Records, Tithable Book Volume II, Page 333 11 There is a Coonrod Butt in the 1830 Ohio Census, Pickaway County, Wayne Township,showing 1 male 50-60, 1 male 60-70. There is also an Isaac Butt with 6 males and 4 females. 12 Bonds were posted by the groom alone or with a second person, usually the father or the brother of the bride, to defray the costs of litigation in the event the marriage was nullified. Bonds were posted in the jurisdiction where the marriage was to take place, often in the bride’s home county. Source: Johni Cerny and Sandra H. Luebking, “Research in Marriage and Divorce Records,” The Source – A Guidebook of American Genealogy, Loretto Dennis Szucs and Sandra Hargreaves Luebking, ed. (Salt Lake City: Ancestry Incorporated, 1996) 87 The Descendants of Addison Butt and Elinor Glenn Page 5 03/01/04 7:36 AM Glenn, presumably the bride's father, and Archibald Butt. This led to the speculation that Addison’s father was named Archibald.13 Know all men by these presents that we Addison Butt & James Glenn are held and firmly bound to his Excellency James Monroe, Esqr. Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia for the time being in the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars to which payment well and truly to be in & to the said governor and his successor in office for the use of the Commonwealth we bind ourselves, our executioners and administrators jointly and severally, ____ by these sealed with our seal and dated 19th day of May, 1802. The condition of the above obligation is such that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fleming Vs. Florey: It All Comes Down to the Mold Kristin Hess La Salle University
    The Histories Volume 2 | Issue 1 Article 3 Fleming vs. Florey: It All Comes Down to the Mold Kristin Hess La Salle University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hess, Kristin () "Fleming vs. Florey: It All Comes Down to the Mold," The Histories: Vol. 2 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol2/iss1/3 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histories, Vol 2, No. 1 Page 3 Fleming vs. Florey: It All Comes Down to the Mold Kristen Hess Without penicillin, the world as it is known today would not exist. Simple infections, earaches, menial operations, and diseases, like syphilis and pneumonia, would possibly all end fatally, shortening the life expectancy of the population, affecting everything from family-size and marriage to retirement plans and insurance policies. So how did this “wonder drug” come into existence and who is behind the development of penicillin? The majority of the population has heard the “Eureka!” story of Alexander Fleming and his famous petri dish with the unusual mold growth, Penicillium notatum. Very few realize that there are not only different variations of the Fleming discovery but that there are also other people who were vitally important to the development of penicillin as an effective drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Archaeology and the NSS: 1941–2006
    George Crothers, P. Willey, and Patty Jo Watson – Cave archaeology and the NSS: 1941–2006. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 69, no. 1, p. 27–34. CAVE ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE NSS: 1941–2006 GEORGE CROTHERS1,P.WILLEY2, AND PATTY JO WATSON3 Abstract: Like most other branches of speleology, cave archaeology in the U.S. grew and developed significantly during the mid to late twentieth century. Originally viewed as marginal to mainstream Americanist archaeology, pursuit of prehistoric and historic archaeology underground is now widely accepted as making valuable contributions to knowledge of human past. The National Speleological Society played a central role in that development and continues to do so. We outline the establishment and growth of cave archaeology in North America, with special emphasis on relations between the NSS and archaeology performed in dark zone, deep cave interiors. INTRODUCTION 1920s and 1930s by ‘‘the Caveman,’’ as Neville was often called. The NSS has directly participated in cave archaeology Despite interest in cave archaeology within the NSS through cooperation, education, and conservation. Mem- governance and some portion of the membership during bers of the Society have made notable contributions to the the first few decades after the organization was formed, science by reporting the location of archaeological sites, systematic, long-term archaeological research by pro- participating in their investigation, and by equipping fessional archaeologists in the dark zones of big caves in scientists with the techniques and technology needed to the Americas did not get underway until the 1960s. There work safely in the cave environment (Damon, 1991, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principles of Gift Law and the Regulation of Organ Donation Alexandra K
    Transplant International ISSN 0934-0874 REVIEW The principles of gift law and the regulation of organ donation Alexandra K. Glazier New England Organ Bank, Boston University School of Law, Waltham, MA, USA Keywords Summary allocation, consent, donation, ethics, legal, regulation. The principles of gift law establish a consistent international legal understand- ing of consent to donation under a range of regulatory systems. Gift law as Correspondence the primary legal principle is important to both the foundation of systems that Alexandra K. Glazier JD, MPH, Vice President prevent organ sales and the consideration of strategies to increase organ dona- & General Counsel, New England Organ tion for transplantation. Bank, Adjunct Professor, Boston University School of Law, 60 First Ave, Waltham, MA 02451, USA. Tel.: 617-244-8000; fax: 617- 558-1094; e-mail: alexandra_glazier@ neob.org Conflicts of Interest The authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Received: 13 September 2010 Revision requested: 13 October 2010 Accepted: 1 January 2011 Published online: 29 January 2011 doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01226.x Introduction The principles of gift law The regulation of consent to organ donation provides the Gift law has its origins in the legal doctrine of property. cornerstone to any system of transplantation by establish- To ‘‘give’’ is understood to mean ‘‘the act by which the ing the legal and ethical infrastructure from which the owner of a thing voluntarily transfers the title and posses- rights and duties of donors, transplant professionals and sion of the same from himself to another person without recipients can be understood. The approach to the con- consideration’’ [1].
    [Show full text]
  • X********X************************************************** * Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made * from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 302 264 IR 052 601 AUTHOR Buckingham, Betty Jo, Ed. TITLE Iowa and Some Iowans. A Bibliography for Schools and Libraries. Third Edition. INSTITUTION Iowa State Dept. of Education, Des Moines. PUB DATE 88 NOTE 312p.; Fcr a supplement to the second edition, see ED 227 842. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibllographies; *Authors; Books; Directories; Elementary Secondary Education; Fiction; History Instruction; Learning Resources Centers; *Local Color Writing; *Local History; Media Specialists; Nonfiction; School Libraries; *State History; United States History; United States Literature IDENTIFIERS *Iowa ABSTRACT Prepared primarily by the Iowa State Department of Education, this annotated bibliography of materials by Iowans or about Iowans is a revised tAird edition of the original 1969 publication. It both combines and expands the scope of the two major sections of previous editions, i.e., Iowan listory and literature, and out-of-print materials are included if judged to be of sufficient interest. Nonfiction materials are listed by Dewey subject classification and fiction in alphabetical order by author/artist. Biographies and autobiographies are entered under the subject of the work or in the 920s. Each entry includes the author(s), title, bibliographic information, interest and reading levels, cataloging information, and an annotation. Author, title, and subject indexes are provided, as well as a list of the people indicated in the bibliography who were born or have resided in Iowa or who were or are considered to be Iowan authors, musicians, artists, or other Iowan creators. Directories of periodicals and annuals, selected sources of Iowa government documents of general interest, and publishers and producers are also provided.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNALES Inheritance and Gift Tax in Poland
    ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN — POLONIA VOL. XLV SECTIO G 1998 Zakład Prawa Finansowego ANTONI HANUSZ Inheritance and gift tax in Poland Podatek od spadków i darowizn w Polsce I Inheritance tax has been around for a very long time - already in ancient times, it was one of the fiscal measures used. From time imme­ morial, it has been held that the moment of handing down a legacy after the death of an owner is, because of the increase in the assets of the heir, a suitable opportunity to impose a special tax upon him. The economic character of inheritance and gift tax assigns it to the category of property tax, since it draws, as a single, extraordinary levy, on the increase in the assets, which usually becomes the source of the collection of this tax. For a relatively long time inheritance and gift tax had not occurred in the Polish tax system as a separate tax. It was however part of an entirely different property rights acquisition tax. It reemerged as a separate inheritance and gift tax in 1975 and is now regulated according to an act of July 28,1983, which has been frequently amended. II Inheritance and gift tax is a levy imposed solely on individuals for only persons can be, since 1990, payers of this tax. In respect to a type 176 ANTONI HANUSZ of personal bond between the vendee and the person from whom or after whom the property or the rights to property have been acquired, the bond being kinship or adoption, the payers of this tax can be divided into three groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Declarations-Part 1
    , ";IV..JULU ;......... '''' -..... iJ 111 ~ ~, CONOOPlIl'IIU!1 DECLARATION GOLDeN RI DGE. CONOOH IN! UHS WDeX Title Section No. Page No. Submis.;on to Condominium CMnersh!p, .............. 1 ........... C1!!finitions •••••• ~~.~ •• ~. ~" •• _ ~ ~ •• ,,~ ••• ~~ ••• ~. ~.# .2. ~ ..... 6.,."" Divi.ion of Property in the Condominium Units and Conveyance of Unit6 ••••.•••...••....• 3 .••.• $ •••• ~. 3 Limited Common Element5 ••••• ~.6 ••• " •••••••• 4" •••••• 4."' ........... 4; Description of Condcninium Unit •• W ...... H •••• ~.H.S ........ "'.H ... '" Condom!n!= ~ap ................................... 6 ............ 5 lnsepl'lt'Jibility of a Condominium Unit. •••• " ......... 7 •• ~ .......... " 5 Repsrate Assersment and Taxation - Noticb' to A5sesBor .............................. 6 •••••••••••• 6 Porm of O\tnership - Title ...... ~ ... ~ •••••••• ~ ••••••. 9 ....... ~.~ •• ~ 6 Non-Pr.rtitionability Bnd Transfer of. ~mrncn element.~~ ......... ~ ... ., •• e ......... * ••••• ~10 .. .,~~~ .... ~ .. " .... 6 Common Ele1lent.5 .............. ~ ............. ~ ......... ,,~ .. 11 .............. ~ .. 6 Use and Occupancy .............................. $ ........................ 12 ..... , " .. .. .. .. .. .... 6 Ea8ements ........................................... 1) .• ~ ..... ., .. ~ .. 7 Termination of Mechanlc l g Lien Rights and Indemnification •••••••••••••....•.. 14 .••••••••••• S C-olden Ridge CondGnliiniurt Association, IfiC ••••• q .. j5 •• ~ ............ "' ... 8 Re8ervation for Access - Maintenance, Repair Bnd Emergenciea~"'""'~~~,.~"'
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical List of Public Sculpture-1
    GEOGRAPHICAL LIST OF SELECTED PERMANENTLY DISPLAYED MAJOR WORKS BY DANIEL CHESTER FRENCH ♦ The following works have been included: Publicly accessible sculpture in parks, public gardens, squares, cemeteries Sculpture that is part of a building’s architecture, or is featured on the exterior of a building, or on the accessible grounds of a building State City Specific Location Title of Work Date CALIFORNIA San Francisco Golden Gate Park, Intersection of John F. THOMAS STARR KING, bronze statue 1888-92 Kennedy and Music Concourse Drives DC Washington Gallaudet College, Kendall Green THOMAS GALLAUDET MEMORIAL; bronze 1885-89 group DC Washington President’s Park, (“The Ellipse”), Executive *FRANCIS DAVIS MILLET AND MAJOR 1912-13 Avenue and Ellipse Drive, at northwest ARCHIBALD BUTT MEMORIAL, marble junction fountain reliefs DC Washington Dupont Circle *ADMIRAL SAMUEL FRANCIS DUPONT 1917-21 MEMORIAL (SEA, WIND and SKY), marble fountain reliefs DC Washington Lincoln Memorial, Lincoln Memorial Circle *ABRAHAM LINCOLN, marble statue 1911-22 NW DC Washington President’s Park South *FIRST DIVISION MEMORIAL (VICTORY), 1921-24 bronze statue GEORGIA Atlanta Norfolk Southern Corporation Plaza, 1200 *SAMUEL SPENCER, bronze statue 1909-10 Peachtree Street NE GEORGIA Savannah Chippewa Square GOVERNOR JAMES EDWARD 1907-10 OGLETHORPE, bronze statue ILLINOIS Chicago Garfield Park Conservatory INDIAN CORN (WOMAN AND BULL), bronze 1893? group !1 State City Specific Location Title of Work Date ILLINOIS Chicago Washington Park, 51st Street and Dr. GENERAL GEORGE WASHINGTON, bronze 1903-04 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, equestrian replica ILLINOIS Chicago Jackson Park THE REPUBLIC, gilded bronze statue 1915-18 ILLINOIS Chicago East Erie Street Victory (First Division Memorial); bronze 1921-24 reproduction ILLINOIS Danville In front of Federal Courthouse on Vermilion DANVILLE, ILLINOIS FOUNTAIN, by Paul 1913-15 Street Manship designed by D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Crusto
    Crusto, Personal Property: Adverse Possession, Bona Fide Purchaser, and Entrustment New Admitted Assignment, Monday, May 11, 2020 ************************************** Please kindly complete in writing and kindly prepare for discussion for the online class on Friday, May 15, 2020, the following exercises: I. Reading Assignments (see attached below, following Crusto’s lecture notes): 1. Adverse Possession, Bona Fide Purchaser, Entrustment: pp. 116-118, 151-163: O’Keeffe v. Snyder (see attachment) and 2. Crusto’s Notes (below) II. Exercises: Exercise 1 Based on the cases and the reading assignment (above) and Crusto lecture notes (below), write an “outline” listing five legal issues for the personal property topics of 1. Adverse Possession, Bona Fide Purchaser, and Entrustment, and ten rules and authorities (one word case name or other source). Exercise 2 Answer the following questions, providing a one sentence answer for each question: 1. Provide three examples of personal (not real) property. 2. What are the indicia (evidence) of ownership of personal property? 3. How does a person normally acquire title to personal property? 4. What role does possession play in evidencing ownership of personal property? 5. What is meant by the maxim that “possession is 9/10s of the law”? 6. How, if ever, can a person acquire title to personal property by adverse possession? 7. What is a statute of limitations? 8. What role did the statute of limitations play in the O’Keefe case? 9. How does a person qualify as a bona fide purchaser? 10. What benefits result from such a qualification? 11. What is the rule of discovery? 12.
    [Show full text]
  • ​Steps for Creating a Deed of Gift
    STEPS FOR CREATING A ​ DEED OF GIFT This worksheet defines the steps for creating a Deed of Gift template. A Deed of Gift is ​ ​ a formal and legal agreement between a donor and a repository, that transfers ownership of and legal rights to the donated materials. Deeds of Gift help build a relationship of trust between an institution and a donor by setting the expectations and conditions an institution must meet as it assumes responsibility and ownership of a collection. Deeds of Gift state what is being donated, who is granting permission for the transfer, and any special rules concerning the access and use of a collection. Deeds of Gift are important in that once signed by both parties, they establish and govern the legal relationship between donor and repository and the legal status of the materials. Follow the steps below to create a template for a deed of gift between your institution and a donor. 1. Give the deed a title Include the name of your institution and “Deed of Gift”. Remember, you will want to give a copy of this document to a donor. Adding a clear, simple title will help donors and their descendants identify the function and importance of this record. Example: Deed of Gift Washington State University Libraries 2. Write a basic statement establishing the transfer of materials to the repository This consists of a generic statement that includes the transfer of ownership and intellectual property rights from the donor to the institution. This statement can be edited depending on the actual agreement made with the donor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rule Against Perpetuities and Its Application to a Private Trust
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 7 1952 The Rule Against Perpetuities and Its Application to a Private Trust Reuben M. Payne Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Estates and Trusts Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Reuben M. Payne, The Rule Against Perpetuities and Its Application toa Private Trust, 1(2) Clev.-Marshall L. Rev. 59 (1952) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rule Against Perpetuities and Its Application to a Private Trust by Reuben M. Payne* T ESTATOR DEVISED certain real property to his daughter in fee. Thereafter he executed a codicil whereby said devise was re- voked and the same property was devised to his son-in-law, in trust. Trustee was to hold it in trust for testator's daughter during the term of her life and in the event of death of daughter, son-in- law was to take possession of property, lease it, and use rents for support, education and benefits of the children of daughter. Daughter survived testator and gave birth to two additional children after testator's death. Held: the trust the testator at- tempted to create in his codicil was void as in violation of the Rule Against Perpetuities, where daughter survived testator and gave birth to two additional children after testator's death.' The court's decision is that a trust for private purpose must terminate within the period of the Rule Against Perpetuities.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE ESTATES and PRECATORY TRUSTS A. Creation of Life Estate
    LIFE ESTATES AND PRECATORY TRUSTS A. Creation of Life Estate upon Passing of Decedent. According to the Official Code of Georgia Annotated (O.C.G.A.) § 44-6-80, estates that “extend during the life of a person but terminate at the death of the person are deemed life estates.”1 A life estate may be created by “deed or will” so long as the life estate does not exist in property that “will be destroyed [upon] being used.”2 Additionally, the life estate may last for the life of the tenant or for the life of some other person.3 Thus, the tenant of the life estate is entitled to the “full use and enjoyment of the property” so long as the life tenant is alive.4 When the life tenant passes, the life estate terminates and the right to present use or possession of the property will pass to either the “estate in remainder” or the “estate in reversion.”5 An estate in remainder is present if a party, other than the grantor and/or his heirs, receives the right to the use and the enjoyment of the property after termination of the the life estate.6 An estate in reversion exists if the right to use or enjoyment reverts back to the grantor and his heirs.7 Despite the legal distinction, the rights of the reversioner are the same as those of a vested remainderman in fee in Georgia.8 There is no technical requirement regarding what type of language is necessary for a testator to create a remainder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rule Against Perpetuities: a Survey of State (And D.C.) Law
    THE RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES: A SURVEY OF STATE (AND D.C.) LAW At common law, the rule against perpetuities provided that: No [nonvested property] interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than 21 years after some life in being at the creation of the interest. Gray, The Rule Against Perpetuities § 201 (4th ed. 1942). Under the common law rule, the interest was invalid unless it was certain on the date the interest was created that it would vest within 21 years after the death of the last designated life in being at that time (the “common law period”). The common law rule ignored any events that occurred after the interest was created, and focused only on what was certain to occur or not to occur when the interest was created. The common law rule remains intact in only three states, however – Alabama, New York, and Texas. Three more states – Iowa, Mississippi and Oklahoma – have the common law rule, with the “wait-and-see” modification that determines whether an interest was valid based on whether it actually vested within the common law period, rather than whether it had to do so in all events. The beginning of the movement away from the common law rule began in 1979, when the Restatement (Second) of Property suggested that this approach was unreasonable, because it ignored events that, in some cases, had already occurred before the court or the parties had to determine the validity of the interests created. Restatement The Rule Against Perpetuities, 50-State Survey, Page 1 DISCLAIMER ON USE: The reader is cautioned to confirm the information provided in this Survey by independent research and analysis to ensure that it is accurate, complete, and current.
    [Show full text]