DOCSLIB.ORG

Antinoite Citizenship Under Hadrian and Antoninus Pius a Prosopographical Study of the First Thirty Years of Antinoopolis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Antinoite Citizenship Under Hadrian and Antoninus Pius a Prosopographical Study of the First Thirty Years of Antinoopolis Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 46 (2009) 81-96 Antinoite Citizenship under Hadrian and Antoninus Pius A Prosopographical Study of the First Thirty Years of Antinoopolis Myrto Malouta University of Oxford Abstract Prosopography of Antinoite citizens attested in 130-161 with com- ments about the composition of the citizen body. This paper is a prosopographical study of the first thirty years in the history of Antinoopolis and aims to identify the key issues associated with Antinoite citizenship under Hadrian and Antoninus Pius.1 Antinoopolis was founded by Hadrian in AD 130, during his extensive travels through the empire. The city was named after Hadrian’s favourite, Antinoos, a Greek boy from Bithynia, who had recently drowned in the Nile. The new foundation was much more than just a memorial to Antinoos, and the value attached to it by the emperor himself2 enhanced the political significance of the city.I ts importance persisted in the centuries that followed, and Antinoopolis even became the administra- tive capital of the province of the Thebaid in the Byzantine period. What was special about Antinoopolis in comparison with other Roman foundations3 was that it was designed to be a Greek polis. Apart from Alex- 1 I wish to thank Roger Bagnall for the invitation to participate in the Inaugural Sather Conference in Berkeley, where an earlier version of this paper was given. 2 For his new foundation Hadrian himself chose the site in Middle Egypt, opposite Hermopolis, where, according to Dio Cassius 69.11.3, Antinoos had drowned. 3 E. Kühn, Antinoopolis. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Hellenismus im römischen Ägypten (Göttingen 1913) 85, reports that W. Weber, Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Kaisers Hadrianus (Leipzig 1907) claimed that the Roman colony Aelia Capitolina was also founded in 130 and colonised with Greeks (on the basis of Dio Cassius 69.12.2 and Zonaras, Epit.Hist. 11.23; might it be that the latter actually confused this with Antinoopolis?). 82 Myrto Malouta andria, Egypt already had two Greek cities, Naucratis in Lower Egypt and Ptolemais in Upper Egypt. Although Antinoopolis was meant to fit in with the other Greek cities in Egypt, Antinoite citizenship stands out because of the way it was acquired. More is known about Antinoite citizenship than about the citizenship of Ptolemais and Naucratis, but much is also known about Alexandrian citizenship.4 Its character of Greek polis comes out in both the organisation of Anti- noopolis and the identity of the people who were chosen to colonise it. The citizens were organised in phylai and demes and possessed a council – the only one securely attested in Egypt apart from that of Ptolemais. The laws imple- mented in the new city were those of Naucratis, and its calendar was taken from Miletus, the mother-city of Naucratis. Like Naucratis, Antinoopolis seems to have been a nomarchy and not a nome or part of a nome.5 The colonists, moreover, were meant to be exclusively Greek, and came from Ptolemais6 or the privileged class of the 6,475 Hellenes of the Arsinoite nome. The evidence does not reveal any colonisation from Naucratis, but it would be reasonable to assume that a number of the colonists may have come from that city as well.7 Furthermore, some historians have interpreted single references in papyri as indications also of Oxyrhynchite, Heracleopolite, Panopolite,8 and Lycopolite9 origin. It is obvious that the foundation and organisation of Antinoopolis were very carefully planned, and this also comes out in the underlying intent of the privileges granted by Hadrian to the colonists, to persuade them to embrace Antinoite citizenship. I will briefly summarise the main privileges. One of the most important privileges was the right of epigamia with the local Egyptian population. This applied to both male and female citizens and ensured that their offspring would not be deprived of citizenship in case of intermarriage between an Antinoite and an Egyptian.10 Another privilege, and one that often gets mentioned in the papyri, is that of the exemption from 4 D. Delia, Alexandrian Citizenship during the Roman Principate (Atlanta 1991). 5 Several references are made in the papyri to the nomarch. The clearest references to the status of nomarchia are P.Oxy. 31.2560, P.Oxy. 47.3362, and P.Ryl. 2.170. In literature: Ptol. Geogr. 4.5.61. 6 W.Chr. 26 = P.Würz. 9. 7 H. Braunert, Die Binnenwanderung (Bonn 1964) 123; A.H.M. Jones, Cities of the Eastern Roman Provinces2 (Oxford 1971) 311. 8 Braunert (n. 7) 217; Kühn (n. 3) 87; SB 5.7601; P.Osl. 3.126. 9 Kühn (n. 3) 158, 348; W.Chr. 28 10 F.A.J. Hoogendijk and P. van Minnen, “Drei Kaiserbriefe Gordians III. an die Bürger von Antinoopolis. P. Vindob. G 25945,” Tyche 2 (1987) 71-74; ���������������M. Zahrnt, “An- tinoopolis in Ägypten. Die hadrianische Gründung und ihre Privilegien in der neueren Antinoite Citizenship 83 discharging liturgies outside Antinoopolis. This would have been especially important in the case of citizens who lived in other nomes, a rather com- mon occurrence as we shall see. Furthermore, Antinoites did not have to pay poll-tax,11 thus joining the privileged status of Romans and citizens of other Greek cities.12 They were exempt from a few additional taxes as well, and these included customs taxes on goods imported for their own use.13 A further fi- nancial benefit was an alimentation fund thatH adrian instituted for Antinoite children on condition that they be registered within the first thirty days of their lives. In the sphere of justice, when legal conflicts had to be brought to court, Antinoite citizens had the right to summon their opponents to trial in Antinoopolis.14 As Greeks, Antinoites were also eligible for joining the Roman legions.15 In addition, Hadrian, already in 131, instituted the Antinoeia, athletic games that took place in the city. The grant of all these benefits makes it clear that Hadrian was anxious to make Antinoite citizenship very inviting so as to attract the kind of colonists that he wanted, namely those with as pure a Greek lineage as could be hoped at that time, and in sufficient numbers. The several kinds of declarations that the citizens were required to submit at various stages of their lives also indicate the desire to monitor closely the population of the new city. Who and what were the first citizens of Antinoopolis? We know that they were Hellenes, a privileged subset of what the Romans considered “Egyptians,” and that in the main they came from the Arsinoite nome and Ptolemais. In order to shed more light on this, I have isolated the evidence from the first thirty-one years of the history of the city and included the prosopographi- cal data in the appendix to this paper. The proposed time-span, the reigns of Hadrian and Antoninus Pius, I see as indicative, since it was during that time that there was a mass acquisition of Antinoite citizenship. The succession of Antoninus Pius is not disruptive, since, in the emperor’s own words,16 his Forschung,” ANRW 2. 10.1 (1988) 690-693; P. Schubert, Les archives de Marcus Lucretius Diogenes et textes apparentés (Bonn 1990) 26. 11 W.Chr. 52 and Zahrnt (n. 10) 693. 12 R.S. Bagnall, “The People of the Roman Fayum,” in Portraits and Masks: Burial Customs in Roman Egypt, ed. M. L. Bierbrier (London 1997) 7. 13 Hoogendijk and van Minnen (n. 10) 53-55. 14 See P.Fam.Tebt. 43 and 37; P.Mich. 6.365 for this ius evocandi ad forum Antinoense. See R. Taubenschlag, “Die kaiserlichen Privilegien im Rechte der Papyri,” in his Opera minora (Warsaw 1959) 2:49-50, for possible limitations. Inter alia he says that we cannot be sure whether this privilege was offered by Hadrian or was given later. 15 Schubert (n. 10) 20. 16 P.Iand. 7.140: edict by the prefect L. Munatius Felix, communicating to the Anti- noites the statement of Antoninus Pius that he intends to follow Hadrian concerning 84 Myrto Malouta intention was to follow his predecessor’s policy towards the new foundation. The drawback of this method is of course that the amount of evidence is rather restricted, but at the same time it hopefully excludes the distortions that arise by drawing conclusions from later evidence, which may be reflecting very dif- ferent circumstances. Only about seventy papyri and ostraca survive from the period of 130 to 161 that mention Antinoopolis or its citizens. Just seven or eight of them actually come from Antinoopolis itself. The vast majority of the others come from the Arsinoite nome, but the Oxyrhynchite and Hermopolite nomes also feature in the evidence. The pattern of distribution of documents after 161 is a lot more varied: there are still many documents mentioning Antinoopolis or its citizens that come from the Arsinoite nome, but all in all the provenance of later documents is more diverse, with the Oxyrhynchite and Hermopolite nomes now being major sources, while the Aphroditopolite nome also fea- tures extensively in the later evidence. More importantly, the percentage of documents that come from Antinoopolis itself is significantly higher, as is the number of the literary texts found there, only a handful of which are assigned to the second century. It is important to keep in mind that the fact that only few papyri of An- tinoite interest of the mid-second century were found in Antinoopolis and elsewhere does not exclude the possibility that there may have been plenty of them and that they have just not been found (yet or at all).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paola Davoli
    Papyri, Archaeology, and Modern History Paola Davoli I. Introduction: the cultural and legal context of the first discoveries. The evaluation and publication of papyri and ostraka often does not take account of the fact that these are archaeological objects. In fact, this notion tends to become of secondary importance compared to that of the text written on the papyrus, so much so that at times the questions of the document’s provenance and find context are not asked. The majority of publications of Greek papyri do not demonstrate any interest in archaeology, while the entire effort and study focus on deciphering, translating, and commenting on the text. Papyri and ostraka, principally in Greek, Latin, and Demotic, are considered the most interesting and important discoveries from Greco-Roman Egypt, since they transmit primary texts, both documentary and literary, which inform us about economic, social, and religious life in the period between the 4th century BCE and the 7th century CE. It is, therefore, clear why papyri are considered “objects” of special value, yet not archaeological objects to study within the sphere of their find context. This total decontextualization of papyri was a common practice until a few years ago though most modern papyrologists have by now fortunately realized how serious this methodological error is for their studies.[1] Collections of papyri composed of a few dozen or of thousands of pieces are held throughout Europe and in the United States. These were created principally between the end of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century, a period in which thousands of papyri were sold in the antiquarian market in Cairo.[2] Greek papyri were acquired only sporadically and in fewer numbers until the first great lot of papyri arrived in Cairo around 1877.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 the Roman Empire
    Eli J. S. Weaverdyck 7 The Roman Empire I Introduction The Roman Empire was one of the largest and longest lasting of all the empires in the ancient world.1 At its height, it controlled the entire coast of the Mediterranean and vast continental hinterlands, including most of western Europe and Great Brit- ain, the Balkans, all of Asia Minor, the Near East as far as the Euphrates (and be- yond, briefly), and northern Africa as far south as the Sahara. The Mediterranean, known to the Romans as mare nostrum(‘our sea’), formed the core. The Mediterranean basin is characterized by extreme variability across both space and time. Geologically, the area is a large subduction zone between the African and European tectonic plates. This not only produces volcanic and seismic activity, it also means that the most commonly encountered bedrock is uplifted limestone, which is easily eroded by water. Much of the coastline is mountainous with deep river valleys. This rugged topography means that even broadly similar climatic conditions can pro- duce drastically dissimilar microclimates within very short distances. In addition, strong interannual variability in precipitation means that local food shortages were an endemic feature of Mediterranean agriculture. In combination, this temporal and spatial variability meant that risk-buffering mechanisms including diversification, storage, and distribution of goods played an important role in ancient Mediterranean survival strategies. Connectivity has always characterized the Mediterranean.2 While geography encouraged mobility, the empire accelerated that tendency, inducing the transfer of people, goods, and ideas on a scale never seen before.3 This mobility, combined with increased demand and the efforts of the imperial govern- ment to mobilize specific products, led to the rise of broad regional specializations, particularly in staple foods and precious metals.4 The results of this increased con- It has also been the subject of more scholarship than any other empire treated in this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Arab Conquest on Late Roman Settlementin Egypt
    Pýý.ý577 THE IMPACT OF THE ARAB CONQUEST ON LATE ROMAN SETTLEMENTIN EGYPT VOLUME I: TEXT UNIVERSITY LIBRARY CAMBRIDGE This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Cambridge, March 2002 ALISON GASCOIGNE DARWIN COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE For my parents with love and thanks Abstract The Impact of the Arab Conquest on Late Roman Settlement in Egypt Alison Gascoigne, Darwin College The Arab conquest of Egypt in 642 AD affected the development of Egyptian towns in various ways. The actual military struggle, the subsequent settling of Arab tribes and changes in administration are discussed in chapter 1, with reference to specific sites and using local archaeological sequences. Chapter 2 assesseswhether our understanding of the archaeological record of the seventh century is detailed enough to allow the accurate dating of settlement changes. The site of Zawyet al-Sultan in Middle Egypt was apparently abandoned and partly burned around the time of the Arab conquest. Analysis of surface remains at this site confirmed the difficulty of accurately dating this event on the basis of current information. Chapters3 and 4 analysethe effect of two mechanismsof Arab colonisation on Egyptian towns. First, an investigation of the occupationby soldiers of threatened frontier towns (ribats) is based on the site of Tinnis. Examination of the archaeological remains indicates a significant expansion of Tinnis in the eighth and ninth centuries, which is confirmed by references in the historical sources to building programmes funded by the central government. Second, the practice of murtaba ` al- jund, the seasonal exploitation of the town and its hinterland for the grazing of animals by specific tribal groups is examined with reference to Kharibta in the western Delta.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: the Timeless
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2013 Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: The imelesT s Allure of the Farnese Antinous Kathleen LaManna Scripps College Recommended Citation LaManna, Kathleen, "Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: The imeT less Allure of the Farnese Antinous" (2013). Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 176. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/176 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POWER AND NOSTALGIA IN ERAS OF CULTURAL REBIRTH: THE TIMELESS ALLURE OF THE FARNESE ANTINOUS by KATHLEEN ROSE LaMANNA SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR MICHELLE BERENFELD PROFESSOR GEORGE GORSE MAY 3, 2013 Acknowledgements To Professor Rankaitis for making sure I could attend the college of my dreams and for everything else. I owe you so much. To Professor Novy for encouraging me to pursue writing. Your class changed my life. Don’t stop rockin! To Professor Emerick for telling me to be an Art History major. To Professor Pohl for your kind words of encouragement, three great semesters, and for being the only person in the world who might love Gladiator more than I do! To Professor Coats for being a great advisor and always being around to sign my many petition forms and for allowing me to pursue a degree with honors.
    [Show full text]
  • Abadah Ibn Al-Samit, 1528 Abadion, Bishop of Antinoopolis, 1551 Abadir
    Index Page numbers in boldface indicate a major discussion. Page numbers in italics indicate illustrations. A_______________________ Aaron at Philae, Apa, 1955 Ababius, Saint, 1, 2081 ‘Abadah ibn al-Samit, 1528 Abadion, Bishop of Antinoopolis, 1551 Abadir. See Ter and Erai, Saints Abadyus. See Dios, Saint Abamu of Tarnut, Saint, 1, 1551 Abamun of Tukh, Saint, 1-2, 1551 Abarkah. See Eucharistic wine Abba origin of term, 2-3 see also Proestos; specific name inverted Abba Maqarah. See Macarius II ‘Abbas Hilmi I Khedive, 1467,1636, 1692 ‘Abbas Hilmi II, Khedive, 1693, 1694, 1988 Abbasids compared with Umayyad administration, 2287 and Islamization, 937 Tulunid and Ikhshid rule, 2280-2281 Abbaton, 2, 1368, 1619 Abbot, 2-3 hegumenos and, 1216 provost and, 2024 see also Abba; specific names inverted ‘Abdallah, 3 ‘Abdallah Abu al-Su‘ud, 1993 ‘Abdallah ibn Musa, 3-4 ‘Abdallah ibn al-Tayyib, 6, 1777 Vol 1: pp. 1-316. Vol 2: pp. 317-662. Vol.3: pp. 663-1004 Vol 4: pp. 1005-1352. Vol 5: pp. 1353-1690. Vol 6: pp. 1391-2034. Vol 7: pp. 2035-2372 ‘Abdallah Nirqi, 4 evidence of Nubian liturgy at, 1817 example of Byzantine cross-in-square building at, 661 Nubian church art at, 1811-1812 ‘Abd al-‘Aziz, Sultan, 893 ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Marwan (Arab governor of Egypt), 85, 709, 1303 ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Sa‘d al-Din, 5 Abdelsayed, Father Gabriel, 1621 ‘Abd al-Malak, Saint, 840 ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, Caliph, 239, 937 ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Musa ibn Nasir, Caliph, 1411 ‘Abd al-Masih (manuscript), 5 ‘Abd al-Masih,Yassa, 1911 doxologies studied by, 1728 ‘Abd al-Masih ibn Ishaq al-Kindi, 5 ‘Abd al-Masih al-Isra’ili al-Raqqi, 5-7 ‘Abd al-Masih, known as Ibn Nuh, 7 ‘Abd al-Masih Salib al-Masu‘di, 7, 14, 1461 on Dayr al-Jarnus, 813 on Dayr al-Khadim and Dayr al-Sanquriyyah, 814 on Dayr Sitt Dimyanah, 870, 871 and Iqladiyus Labib, 1302 and Isidhurus, 1307 on Jirjis al-Jawhari al-Khanani, 1334 on monastery of Pisentius, 757 ‘Abd al-Raziq, ‘Ali, 1996 ‘Abd al-Sayyid, Mikha’il, 1465, 1994 ‘Abduh, Muhammad, 1995 Abednego, 1092 Abfiyyah (martyr), 1552 Abgar, King of Edessa, 7-8, 1506 Abib.
    [Show full text]
  • Patric O'neill
    Patric O’Neill Portraits April 22, 2008 Sarcophagus Paintings of Fayum The Sarcophagus paintings of Fayum are known as some of the oldest paintings from the Mediterranean area. They represent the people of the 1st century and the diverse mix of people and culture in Egypt. These portraits were thought to represent the deceased of the upper class society. The strong impact they have even today, is due to the intense color and naturalistic feel that these paintings illustrate. Recovery Fayum portraits are important pieces of cultural documentation as well as art. They embody many of the great Greek painting traditions. Fayum and its surrounding area is the only area that paintings from this time have survived. The extremely hot dry climate has helped to preserve these paintings, leaving the rich colors and textures intact. There are around 700 Fayum portraits that have been recovered, 130 of them exist in North America. Amazingly, less than 25 of these portraits had been discovered before 1887 (Thompson, page 3). Fayum is an area in Egypt, south of Cairo, along the Nile River. The Fayum portraits however have been found throughout Egypt, so the term Fayum relates more to the style of the paintings and less about the specific geographic location of Fayum. A large portion of these portraits were found in Hawara and Antinoopolis, as well as a smaller portion being found in er- Rubayat and Deir el-Bahri. Antinoopolis for example, is approximately 150 km south of the Fayum region. The Technique of a Fayum Painter A typical starting point for a Fayum portrait, would be selecting a square or rectangular piece of wood.
    [Show full text]
  • ١٢٦ رس : ﻛود اﻟﻣﻘرر ﻣﻘرر ﺣﺿﺎرة واﺛﺎر اﻟﻣﻧﯾﺎ Hermopolis (El-Ashmunein)
    ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﻣﻧﯾﺎ ﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺣﺔ واﻟﻔﻧﺎدق ﻗﺳم اﻻرﺷﺎد اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺣﻲ اﻟﻔرﻗﺔ اﻻوﻟﻲ ﻣﻘرر ﺣﺿﺎرة واﺛﺎر اﻟﻣﻧﯾﺎ ﻛود اﻟﻣﻘرر: رس ١٢٦ اﻟﻣﺣﺎﺿرة اﻻوﻟﻲ (Hermopolis (El-Ashmunein د. ﻓرج ﻋﺑﯾد زﻛﻲ ﻣدرس اﻻرﺷﺎد اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺣﻲ ﺑﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺣﺔ واﻟﻔﻧﺎدق -ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﻣﻧﯾﺎ وﺳﯾﻠﺔ اﻟﺗواﺻل: [email protected] Hermopolis (El-Ashmunein) • Location • Name • Historical and archaeologicl importance of the city • The most distinguished buildings in Hermopolis • The open museum in the site of El-Ahshmunien Location: • It is located near modern el-Ashmunein, on the west bank of the Nile, on the borderline between Upper and Middle Egypt about 8km north-west of Mallawi, opposite Antinoopolis in Minia Governorate, Name: • In the ancient Egyptian language it was called Khemenu (Ḫmnw) which means ‘town of eight’, named after the Ogdoad. According to the Hermopolitan creation myth there were eight primeval deities (four frog-gods and four snake-goddeses) created the cosmos in Hermopolis. These deities symbolized different aspects of chaos before they eventually brought the primeval mound into being. Name: • In the Graeco-Roman Period the city was called Hermopolis which means "The City of Hermes" since the Greeks identified Hermes with Thoth, because the city was the main cult centre of Thoth, the Pharaonic god of magic, healing, and wisdom and the patron of scribes. • In coptic it was known as Shmun, from which the .is derived (اﻷﺷﻣوﻧﯾن :modern name el Ashmunein (Arabic Historical and archaeological importance of the city • It was the cult center of god Thoth, god of wisdom, healing and writing in ancient Egypt. • The city is associated with the Hermopolitan creation myth of the cosmos by the ogdoad.
    [Show full text]
  • Mummy Portraits in the J
    MUMMY PORTRAITS IN THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM By David L. Thompson Cat. no. 1. Portrait of a lady Photography of Getty Museum works of art by Donald Hull and Penny Potter 81.AP.42 Design by Tom Lombardi Encaustic on wood Typography by Marchese Graphics, Inc., Los Angeles H: 33.6 cm.; W: 17.2 cm. Printing by Alan Lithograph, Los Angeles H (of cartonnage): 46.4 cm.; W (of cartonnage): On top: 21.6 cm., © 1982 The J. Paul Getty Museum On bottom: 36.8 cm. 17985 Pacific Coast Highway (See pp. 32-33) Malibu, California 90265 Library of Congress catalogue number 82-81303 ISBN number 0-89236-038-0 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Thompson, David L. Mummy portraits in the ]. Paul Getty Museum. Rev. ed. of: The artists of the mummy portraits. © 1976. With new material added. Catalogue: p. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Mummy portraits—Catalogs. 2. Portraits, Roman—Egypt—Catalogs. 3- Mummy portraits— California—Malibu—Catalogs. 4. J. Paul Getty Museum—Catalogs. I. ]. Paul Getty Museum. II. Title. ND1327.E3T48 1982 757\9'0932074019493 82-81303 The introduction of this book is, in part, a revision of The Artists of the Mummy Portraits by David L. Thompson, published in 1976 by the J. Paul Getty Museum. Unless otherwise stated, the figures are reproduced from photographs supplied by the museums that own the objects. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1 Introduction 2 Recovery and provenience 3 Technical aspects 6 Use of the portraits 8 Chronology 10 The art market 12 Preservation and conservation 13 Portraits? 14 The painters *6 Other paintings 24 Conclusion 27 Notes 28 Catalogue: Mummy Portraits in the J.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] Archaeology 2012–2016, IACS 2016 1
    I. General: Sites and surveys II. Sites A. Military installations B. Settlements C. Cemeteries III. Developments, trends and desiderata I. General: Sites and surveys General: Sites Brune, K.-H. and S. Timm. 2007. Index zu Das christlich-koptische Ägypten in arabischer Zeit (Stefan Timm). Beihefte zum Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients; Reihe B. Geisteswissenschaften 41.7. Wiesbaden: Reichert. Timm, S. (ed.). 1984–1992. Das christlich-koptische Ägypten in arabischer Zeit: Eine Sammlung christlicher Stätten in Ägypten in arabischer Zeit, unter Ausschluss von Alexandria, Kairo, des Apa-Mena-Klosters. 6 vols. Beihefte zum Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients; Reihe B. Geisteswissenschaften 41.1–6. Wiesbaden: Reichert . (ed.). 2015. Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum. Stuttgart: Hiersemann. Bagnall, R. S. and D. Rathbone (eds). 2016. Egypt from Alexander to the Copts: An archaeological and historical guide. 2nd revised ed. Cairo; New York: AUC Press. General: Archaeology Bagnall, R. S. 2001. Archaeological work on Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, 1995–2000. American Journal of Archaeology 105: 227–43. Bagnall, R. S. and P. Davoli. 2011. Archaeological work on Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, 2000–2009. American Journal of Archaeology 115: 103–57. Brooks Hedstrom, D. L. 2012. The archaeology of Late Antique Egypt. In Encyclopedia of global archaeology, ed. C. Smith, 4432–41. New York: Springer. O’Co E. R. 2014. tt m ts a d m t ri s i Lat A tiqu E ypt: A i trodu tio . In Egypt in the First Millennium AD: Perspectives from new fieldwork, ed. E. R. O’Co 1–19. British Museum Publications on Egypt and Sudan 2.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Jamshidi Oregon 0171N 12232.Pdf
    BUILDING A GOD: THE CULT OF ANTINOUS AND IDENTITY IN THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE by NIAYESH JAMSHIDI A THESIS Presented to the Department of Classics and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts June 2018 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Niayesh Jamshidi Title: Building a God: The Cult of Antinous and Identity in the Eastern Roman Empire This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Department of Classics by: Lowell Bowditch Chairperson Mary Jaeger Member and Sara D. Hodges Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2018 ii © 2018 Niayesh Jamshidi iii THESIS ABSTRACT Niayesh Jamshidi Master of Arts Department of Classics June 2018 Title: Building a God: The Cult of Antinous and Identity in the Eastern Roman Empire This thesis attempts to understand the distribution of Antinous worship in the Roman Empire and why he was worshipped. By examining the written sources and material culture available on Antinous, primary sources both pagan and Christian, and material culture such as the sculptures of Antinous, Antinoopolis and temples dedicated to Antinous, I came to the conclusion that Antinous was worshipped primary in the Eastern part of the Roman Empire. The Eastern part of the Roman Empire consisted of people who were of Greek descent. By examining Roman writings against Greek people and culture, I came to the conclusion that there were reasons that people worshipped Antinous.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the John Rylands Library
    ·· .. THE PRESENT POSITION OF PAPYROLOGY.1 BY B. P. GRENFELL, D.LITT., F.B.A., PROFF.sSOR OF PAPYR­ OLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD. HE conquest of Egypt by Alexander the Great in 332 B.c. T brought the country of the Pharaohs out of its comparative isolation into the main stream of European culture, which through Greece and Rome extends to our own day. Under the Ptolemies the most brilliant of the Hellenistic kingdoms, with Alexandria as the literary and scientific centre of the civilized world, under the Romans the richest and most important province of the Empire, under the earlier Byzantine Emperors foremost in the defence of T rinitarian Christianity and the foundation of Monasticism, Egypt had great in­ fluence on the history of the West for nearly a thousand years, until with the invasion of the Arabs in 640 the country was again isolated, not to return to the main stream until 1870, when once more, as the Khedive Ismail remarked at the opening of the Suez Canal, Egypt became part of Europe. The Ptolemies made Greek the official language, and under the Romans, who conquered Egypt in 30 B.C., but employed Latin only in the highest official and in military circles, a knowledge of Greek be­ came general, though ancient Egyptian continued to be spoken down to the third century, when in a Grrecised form it became the Coptic language, which lasted till the sixteenth century. Hence the great majority of papyri from Egypt, written between 300 B.C. and the middle of the seventh century, are in Greek, and though there are many written in demotic and Coptic, and a few in Latin, Hebrew, Syriac, Aramaic, and Pehlevi, papyrology has come to mean practically the study of Greek papyri, including various substitutes for papyrus as writing-material, such as ostraca (bits of broken pottery), wooden or wax tablets, and after the second century vellum.
    [Show full text]
  • Limestone and Sandstone Were the Principal Building Stones Employed by the Egyptians, While Anhydrite and Gypsum Were Also Used Along the Red Sea Coast
    UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Building Stones Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fd124g0 Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Author Harrell, James A. Publication Date 2012-05-31 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fd124g0#supplemental Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California BUILDING STONES أحجار البناء James A. Harrell EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Material Culture University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Harrell, 2012, Building Stones. UEE. Full Citation: Harrell, James A., 2012, Building Stones. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002c10gb 8751 Version 1, May 2012 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002c10gb BUILDING STONES أحجار البناء James A. Harrell Bausteine Pierre Construction The building stones of ancient Egypt are those relatively soft, plentiful rocks used to construct most temples, pyramids, and mastaba tombs. They were also employed for the interior passages, burial chambers, and outer casings of mud-brick pyramids and mastabas. Similarly, building stones were used in other mud-brick structures of ancient Egypt wherever extra strength was needed, such as bases for wood pillars, and lintels, thresholds, and jambs for doors. Limestone and sandstone were the principal building stones employed by the Egyptians, while anhydrite and gypsum were also used along the Red Sea coast. A total of 128 ancient quarries for building stones are known (89 for limestone, 36 for sandstone, and three for gypsum), but there are probably many others still undiscovered or destroyed by modern quarrying.
    [Show full text]