DOCSLIB.ORG

[email protected] Archaeology 2012–2016, IACS 2016 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eoconnell@Thebritishmuseum.Ac.Uk Archaeology 2012–2016, IACS 2016 1 I. General: Sites and surveys II. Sites A. Military installations B. Settlements C. Cemeteries III. Developments, trends and desiderata I. General: Sites and surveys General: Sites Brune, K.-H. and S. Timm. 2007. Index zu Das christlich-koptische Ägypten in arabischer Zeit (Stefan Timm). Beihefte zum Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients; Reihe B. Geisteswissenschaften 41.7. Wiesbaden: Reichert. Timm, S. (ed.). 1984–1992. Das christlich-koptische Ägypten in arabischer Zeit: Eine Sammlung christlicher Stätten in Ägypten in arabischer Zeit, unter Ausschluss von Alexandria, Kairo, des Apa-Mena-Klosters. 6 vols. Beihefte zum Tübinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients; Reihe B. Geisteswissenschaften 41.1–6. Wiesbaden: Reichert . (ed.). 2015. Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum. Stuttgart: Hiersemann. Bagnall, R. S. and D. Rathbone (eds). 2016. Egypt from Alexander to the Copts: An archaeological and historical guide. 2nd revised ed. Cairo; New York: AUC Press. General: Archaeology Bagnall, R. S. 2001. Archaeological work on Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, 1995–2000. American Journal of Archaeology 105: 227–43. Bagnall, R. S. and P. Davoli. 2011. Archaeological work on Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, 2000–2009. American Journal of Archaeology 115: 103–57. Brooks Hedstrom, D. L. 2012. The archaeology of Late Antique Egypt. In Encyclopedia of global archaeology, ed. C. Smith, 4432–41. New York: Springer. O’Co E. R. 2014. tt m ts a d m t ri s i Lat A tiqu E ypt: A i trodu tio . In Egypt in the First Millennium AD: Perspectives from new fieldwork, ed. E. R. O’Co 1–19. British Museum Publications on Egypt and Sudan 2. Leuven: Peeters. Riggs, C. 2012. The Oxford handbook of Roman Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press. General: Christian archaeology and architecture Thirard, C. 2012. Survivance des sites monastiques paléochrétiens dans le Proche-Orient. i iot qu d’ tud s Copt s 20. Cairo: stitut ra ias d’Ar o o i Ori ta . Brooks Hedstrom, D. and H. Dey. 2016. The archaeology of early monasticism. In Cambridge history of Medieval Western monasticism, eds A. I. Beach and I. Cochelin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brooks Hedstrom, D. L. 2016. Monastic settlements as monastic domestic households. In Oxford handbook of Christian monasticism, ed. B. Kaczynski. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———. 2016. Reconsidering the emerging monastic desertscape. In Copts revisited: Pharaohs, caliphs and iPods. Theories, methods and topics in Coptic studies, (ed.) N. van Doom. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. Davis, S. 2012. Life and death in Lower and Upper Egypt: A brief survey of recent monastic archaeology at Yale. Journal of the Canadian Society for Coptic Studies 3–4.1: 9–26. i a V. 2016. V t urs d a ristia isatio d ’ ypt au V siècle à la lumière des sources archéologiques. In Acta XVI congressus internationalis archaeologiae christianae Romae (22–28.9.2013). Costantino e i Costantinidi: L’innovazione costantiniana, le sue radici e i suoi sviluppi, ed. O. Brandt, G. Castiglia, and V. Fiocchi Nicolai, 1–27. Studi di antichità cristiana 66. Vatican City: Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana. i a V. 2016. L’ar o o i du mo a ism ypti du V si : tat d a qu stio . In Nag Hammadi à 70 ans. Qu’avons-nous appris?, ed. T. Rasimus and L. Painchaud. Bibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi. Qu : Pr ss s d ’U iv rsit Lava . Grossmann, P. 2012. Mönchtum II (Architektur). Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 24: 1064–98. Grossmann, P. 2015. Sacred architecture. In Egypt: Faith after the pharaohs, ed. C. Fluck, G. Helmecke, and E. R. O’Co 86–91. London: The British Museum. rossma P. 2012. Zur E tst u d s Ḫūrus im ä yptis Kir au. Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 55: 103–33. Innemée, K. C. 2015. Monastic architecture. In Egypt: Faith after the pharaohs, ed. C. Fluck, G. Helmecke, and E. R. O’Co 118–21. London: The British Museum. Gabra, G. (and H. N. Takla from 2008). 2005–2014. Christianity and monasticism. Cairo: AUC Press. [email protected] Archaeology 2012–2016, IACS 2016 1 Torjesen, K. J. and G. Gabra (eds). 2009. Claremont Coptic Encyclopedia. http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/cce. II. Sites (all websites last accessed 4 July 2016) A. Military installations Nag’al-Hagar Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Spätrömisches Kastell Praesentia(?)/Nag el-Hagar in Oberägypten. http://www.vfp-archaeologie.uni-muenchen.de/forschung/provinzial/nag_el_har/index.html. Mackensen, M. and M. El-Bialy. 2012. Fourth report of the Egyptian-Swiss Joint Mission at the Late Roman fort at Nağ’a -Hağar ar Kom Om o (Upp r E ypt). Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte 84 (2010): 243–58. ———. 2013. The Late Roman fort at Nag al-Hagar near Kom Ombo (Upper Egypt). Report on the fourth season of the Egyptian-Swiss joint mission. In The first cataract of the Nile: One region –diverse perspectives, ed. D. Raue, S. J. Seidlmayer, and P. Speiser, 111–21. Sonderschriften des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Kairo 36. Berlin: De Gruyter. Franke, R. 2012. Demonstration kaiserlicher Macht am Nil – Das spätr mis Kast Na ’a -Hagar bei Kom Ombo in Oberägypten. Antike Welt 5: 57–65. ———. 2013. T adquart rs ui di i t t trar i fort at Na ’a -Hagar (Upper Egypt). Journal of Roman Archaeology 26: 456–63. ———. 2015. The tetrarchic fort at Na ’a -Hagar (Upper Egypt): Excavations in 2005 to 2012. In Limes XXII: Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies Ruse, Bulgaria, September 2012, ed. L. Vagalinski and N. Sharankov, 369–75. Sofia: National Archaeological Institute with Museum of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Karelin, D. A. 2011. Imaging of the Late Roman castrum. Hypothetical computer reconstruction of Nag el-Hagar fortress in Egypt. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies 2(15): 1–20. Luxor Temple Jones, M. and S. McFadden. 2015. Art of empire: The Roman frescoes and imperial cult chamber in Luxor Temple. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. McFadden, S. 2014. Art on the edge: The Late Roman wall paintings of Amheida, Egypt. In Antike Malerei zwischen Lokalstil und Zeitstil: Akten des XI. Internationalen Kolloquiums der AIPMA (Association Internationale pour la Peinture Murale Antique) 13.–17. September 2010 in Ephesos, ed. N. Zimmermann. Denkschriften/Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 468; Archäologische Forschungen 23. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Babylon Sheehan, P. 2010. Babylon of Egypt: The archaeology of old Cairo and the origins of the city. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press. Sheehan, P. 2012. The port of Babylon in Egypt. In Navigated spaces, connected places: Proceedings of Red Sea Project V, held at the University of Exeter, 16–19 September 2010, ed. D. A. Agius, J. P. Cooper, A. Trakadas, and C. Zazzaro, 103–115. BAR International Series 2346; British Foundation for the Study of Arabia Monographs 12. Oxford: Archaeopress. Hisn al-Bab Österreichisches Archäologisches Institut. Hisn al-Bab. http://www.oeai.at/index.php/hisn-al-bab.html. Gascoigne, A. L. and P. J. Rose. 2012. The forts of Hisn al-Bab and the First Cataract Frontier from the 5th to 12th centuries AD. Sudan & Nubia 16: 88–95. Rose, P. J. and A. L. Gascoigne. 2013. Hisn al-Bab: More symbol than substance. In The power of walls: Fortifications in ancient Northeastern Africa. Proceedings of the international workshop held at the University of Cologne, 4th–7th August 2011, ed. F. Jesse and C. Vogel, 251–68. Colloquium Africanum 5. Köln: Heinrich-Barth-Institut. Eastern Desert stitut fra çais d’ar o o i ori ta . L s pra sidia romai s du d s rt Ori ta . http://www.ifao.egnet.net/archeologie/praesidia/. Brun, J.-P. and H. Cuvigny. 2011–2012. Didymoi: Une garnison romaine dans le désert oriental d’Égypte: Praesidia du désert de Bérénice IV. oui s d ’ stitut ra çais d’Ar o o i Ori ta du Cair 64 67. Cairo: stitut ra çais d’Ar o o i Ori ta . Brun, J.-P. 2015. Un vase fabriqué à Aksoum découv rt da s pra sidium d Didymoi (d s rt ori ta d’ ypt ). Bulletin de Liaison de la Céramique Égyptienne 25: 323–29. [email protected] Archaeology 2012–2016, IACS 2016 2 Western Desert Rossi, C. 2012. Controlling the borders of the empire: The distribution of Late-Roma ‘forts’ in the Kharga Oasis. In The Oasis Papers 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Dakhleh Oasis Project, ed. R. S. Bagnall, P. Davoli, C. A. Hope, and B. E. Parr, 331–36. Dakhleh Oasis Project 15. Oxford; Oakville, CT: Oxbow Books. Kucera, P. 2012. Al-Qasr: The Roman castrum of Dakhleh Oasis. In The Oasis Papers 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Dakhleh Oasis Project, ed. R. S. Bagnall, P. Davoli, C. A. Hope, and B. E. Parr, 305–16. Dakhleh Oasis Project 15. Oxford; Oakville, CT: Oxbow Books. Gehad, B., M. Wuttmann, H. Whitehouse, M. Foad and S. Marchand. 2013. Wall-paintings in a Roman house at ancient Kysis, Kharga Oasis. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 113: 157–81. B. Other settlements: cities, towns, monasteries UPPER EGYPT ASWAN GOVERNATE Qasr Ibrim Adams, W. Y. 2013. Qasr Ibrim: The Ballaña phase. Egypt Exploration Society Memoirs 104. London: Egypt Exploration Society Adams, W. Y. 2010. Qasr Ibrim: The earlier Medieval period. Egypt Exploration Society Memoirs 89. London: Egypt Exploration Society. Aldsworth, F. 2010. Qasr Ibrim: The Cathedral Church. Egypt Exploration Society Memoirs 97. London: Egypt Exploration Society Van der Vliet, J. and J. L. Hagen (eds). 2013. Qasr Ibrim, between Egypt and Africa: A case study in cultural exchange NINO symposium, Leiden, 11–12 December 2009.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paola Davoli
    Papyri, Archaeology, and Modern History Paola Davoli I. Introduction: the cultural and legal context of the first discoveries. The evaluation and publication of papyri and ostraka often does not take account of the fact that these are archaeological objects. In fact, this notion tends to become of secondary importance compared to that of the text written on the papyrus, so much so that at times the questions of the document’s provenance and find context are not asked. The majority of publications of Greek papyri do not demonstrate any interest in archaeology, while the entire effort and study focus on deciphering, translating, and commenting on the text. Papyri and ostraka, principally in Greek, Latin, and Demotic, are considered the most interesting and important discoveries from Greco-Roman Egypt, since they transmit primary texts, both documentary and literary, which inform us about economic, social, and religious life in the period between the 4th century BCE and the 7th century CE. It is, therefore, clear why papyri are considered “objects” of special value, yet not archaeological objects to study within the sphere of their find context. This total decontextualization of papyri was a common practice until a few years ago though most modern papyrologists have by now fortunately realized how serious this methodological error is for their studies.[1] Collections of papyri composed of a few dozen or of thousands of pieces are held throughout Europe and in the United States. These were created principally between the end of the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century, a period in which thousands of papyri were sold in the antiquarian market in Cairo.[2] Greek papyri were acquired only sporadically and in fewer numbers until the first great lot of papyri arrived in Cairo around 1877.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 the Roman Empire
    Eli J. S. Weaverdyck 7 The Roman Empire I Introduction The Roman Empire was one of the largest and longest lasting of all the empires in the ancient world.1 At its height, it controlled the entire coast of the Mediterranean and vast continental hinterlands, including most of western Europe and Great Brit- ain, the Balkans, all of Asia Minor, the Near East as far as the Euphrates (and be- yond, briefly), and northern Africa as far south as the Sahara. The Mediterranean, known to the Romans as mare nostrum(‘our sea’), formed the core. The Mediterranean basin is characterized by extreme variability across both space and time. Geologically, the area is a large subduction zone between the African and European tectonic plates. This not only produces volcanic and seismic activity, it also means that the most commonly encountered bedrock is uplifted limestone, which is easily eroded by water. Much of the coastline is mountainous with deep river valleys. This rugged topography means that even broadly similar climatic conditions can pro- duce drastically dissimilar microclimates within very short distances. In addition, strong interannual variability in precipitation means that local food shortages were an endemic feature of Mediterranean agriculture. In combination, this temporal and spatial variability meant that risk-buffering mechanisms including diversification, storage, and distribution of goods played an important role in ancient Mediterranean survival strategies. Connectivity has always characterized the Mediterranean.2 While geography encouraged mobility, the empire accelerated that tendency, inducing the transfer of people, goods, and ideas on a scale never seen before.3 This mobility, combined with increased demand and the efforts of the imperial govern- ment to mobilize specific products, led to the rise of broad regional specializations, particularly in staple foods and precious metals.4 The results of this increased con- It has also been the subject of more scholarship than any other empire treated in this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Arab Conquest on Late Roman Settlementin Egypt
    Pýý.ý577 THE IMPACT OF THE ARAB CONQUEST ON LATE ROMAN SETTLEMENTIN EGYPT VOLUME I: TEXT UNIVERSITY LIBRARY CAMBRIDGE This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Cambridge, March 2002 ALISON GASCOIGNE DARWIN COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE For my parents with love and thanks Abstract The Impact of the Arab Conquest on Late Roman Settlement in Egypt Alison Gascoigne, Darwin College The Arab conquest of Egypt in 642 AD affected the development of Egyptian towns in various ways. The actual military struggle, the subsequent settling of Arab tribes and changes in administration are discussed in chapter 1, with reference to specific sites and using local archaeological sequences. Chapter 2 assesseswhether our understanding of the archaeological record of the seventh century is detailed enough to allow the accurate dating of settlement changes. The site of Zawyet al-Sultan in Middle Egypt was apparently abandoned and partly burned around the time of the Arab conquest. Analysis of surface remains at this site confirmed the difficulty of accurately dating this event on the basis of current information. Chapters3 and 4 analysethe effect of two mechanismsof Arab colonisation on Egyptian towns. First, an investigation of the occupationby soldiers of threatened frontier towns (ribats) is based on the site of Tinnis. Examination of the archaeological remains indicates a significant expansion of Tinnis in the eighth and ninth centuries, which is confirmed by references in the historical sources to building programmes funded by the central government. Second, the practice of murtaba ` al- jund, the seasonal exploitation of the town and its hinterland for the grazing of animals by specific tribal groups is examined with reference to Kharibta in the western Delta.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: the Timeless
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2013 Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: The imelesT s Allure of the Farnese Antinous Kathleen LaManna Scripps College Recommended Citation LaManna, Kathleen, "Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: The imeT less Allure of the Farnese Antinous" (2013). Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 176. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/176 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POWER AND NOSTALGIA IN ERAS OF CULTURAL REBIRTH: THE TIMELESS ALLURE OF THE FARNESE ANTINOUS by KATHLEEN ROSE LaMANNA SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR MICHELLE BERENFELD PROFESSOR GEORGE GORSE MAY 3, 2013 Acknowledgements To Professor Rankaitis for making sure I could attend the college of my dreams and for everything else. I owe you so much. To Professor Novy for encouraging me to pursue writing. Your class changed my life. Don’t stop rockin! To Professor Emerick for telling me to be an Art History major. To Professor Pohl for your kind words of encouragement, three great semesters, and for being the only person in the world who might love Gladiator more than I do! To Professor Coats for being a great advisor and always being around to sign my many petition forms and for allowing me to pursue a degree with honors.
    [Show full text]
  • Abadah Ibn Al-Samit, 1528 Abadion, Bishop of Antinoopolis, 1551 Abadir
    Index Page numbers in boldface indicate a major discussion. Page numbers in italics indicate illustrations. A_______________________ Aaron at Philae, Apa, 1955 Ababius, Saint, 1, 2081 ‘Abadah ibn al-Samit, 1528 Abadion, Bishop of Antinoopolis, 1551 Abadir. See Ter and Erai, Saints Abadyus. See Dios, Saint Abamu of Tarnut, Saint, 1, 1551 Abamun of Tukh, Saint, 1-2, 1551 Abarkah. See Eucharistic wine Abba origin of term, 2-3 see also Proestos; specific name inverted Abba Maqarah. See Macarius II ‘Abbas Hilmi I Khedive, 1467,1636, 1692 ‘Abbas Hilmi II, Khedive, 1693, 1694, 1988 Abbasids compared with Umayyad administration, 2287 and Islamization, 937 Tulunid and Ikhshid rule, 2280-2281 Abbaton, 2, 1368, 1619 Abbot, 2-3 hegumenos and, 1216 provost and, 2024 see also Abba; specific names inverted ‘Abdallah, 3 ‘Abdallah Abu al-Su‘ud, 1993 ‘Abdallah ibn Musa, 3-4 ‘Abdallah ibn al-Tayyib, 6, 1777 Vol 1: pp. 1-316. Vol 2: pp. 317-662. Vol.3: pp. 663-1004 Vol 4: pp. 1005-1352. Vol 5: pp. 1353-1690. Vol 6: pp. 1391-2034. Vol 7: pp. 2035-2372 ‘Abdallah Nirqi, 4 evidence of Nubian liturgy at, 1817 example of Byzantine cross-in-square building at, 661 Nubian church art at, 1811-1812 ‘Abd al-‘Aziz, Sultan, 893 ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Marwan (Arab governor of Egypt), 85, 709, 1303 ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Sa‘d al-Din, 5 Abdelsayed, Father Gabriel, 1621 ‘Abd al-Malak, Saint, 840 ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, Caliph, 239, 937 ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Musa ibn Nasir, Caliph, 1411 ‘Abd al-Masih (manuscript), 5 ‘Abd al-Masih,Yassa, 1911 doxologies studied by, 1728 ‘Abd al-Masih ibn Ishaq al-Kindi, 5 ‘Abd al-Masih al-Isra’ili al-Raqqi, 5-7 ‘Abd al-Masih, known as Ibn Nuh, 7 ‘Abd al-Masih Salib al-Masu‘di, 7, 14, 1461 on Dayr al-Jarnus, 813 on Dayr al-Khadim and Dayr al-Sanquriyyah, 814 on Dayr Sitt Dimyanah, 870, 871 and Iqladiyus Labib, 1302 and Isidhurus, 1307 on Jirjis al-Jawhari al-Khanani, 1334 on monastery of Pisentius, 757 ‘Abd al-Raziq, ‘Ali, 1996 ‘Abd al-Sayyid, Mikha’il, 1465, 1994 ‘Abduh, Muhammad, 1995 Abednego, 1092 Abfiyyah (martyr), 1552 Abgar, King of Edessa, 7-8, 1506 Abib.
    [Show full text]
  • Patric O'neill
    Patric O’Neill Portraits April 22, 2008 Sarcophagus Paintings of Fayum The Sarcophagus paintings of Fayum are known as some of the oldest paintings from the Mediterranean area. They represent the people of the 1st century and the diverse mix of people and culture in Egypt. These portraits were thought to represent the deceased of the upper class society. The strong impact they have even today, is due to the intense color and naturalistic feel that these paintings illustrate. Recovery Fayum portraits are important pieces of cultural documentation as well as art. They embody many of the great Greek painting traditions. Fayum and its surrounding area is the only area that paintings from this time have survived. The extremely hot dry climate has helped to preserve these paintings, leaving the rich colors and textures intact. There are around 700 Fayum portraits that have been recovered, 130 of them exist in North America. Amazingly, less than 25 of these portraits had been discovered before 1887 (Thompson, page 3). Fayum is an area in Egypt, south of Cairo, along the Nile River. The Fayum portraits however have been found throughout Egypt, so the term Fayum relates more to the style of the paintings and less about the specific geographic location of Fayum. A large portion of these portraits were found in Hawara and Antinoopolis, as well as a smaller portion being found in er- Rubayat and Deir el-Bahri. Antinoopolis for example, is approximately 150 km south of the Fayum region. The Technique of a Fayum Painter A typical starting point for a Fayum portrait, would be selecting a square or rectangular piece of wood.
    [Show full text]
  • ١٢٦ رس : ﻛود اﻟﻣﻘرر ﻣﻘرر ﺣﺿﺎرة واﺛﺎر اﻟﻣﻧﯾﺎ Hermopolis (El-Ashmunein)
    ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﻣﻧﯾﺎ ﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺣﺔ واﻟﻔﻧﺎدق ﻗﺳم اﻻرﺷﺎد اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺣﻲ اﻟﻔرﻗﺔ اﻻوﻟﻲ ﻣﻘرر ﺣﺿﺎرة واﺛﺎر اﻟﻣﻧﯾﺎ ﻛود اﻟﻣﻘرر: رس ١٢٦ اﻟﻣﺣﺎﺿرة اﻻوﻟﻲ (Hermopolis (El-Ashmunein د. ﻓرج ﻋﺑﯾد زﻛﻲ ﻣدرس اﻻرﺷﺎد اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺣﻲ ﺑﻛﻠﯾﺔ اﻟﺳﯾﺎﺣﺔ واﻟﻔﻧﺎدق -ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﻣﻧﯾﺎ وﺳﯾﻠﺔ اﻟﺗواﺻل: [email protected] Hermopolis (El-Ashmunein) • Location • Name • Historical and archaeologicl importance of the city • The most distinguished buildings in Hermopolis • The open museum in the site of El-Ahshmunien Location: • It is located near modern el-Ashmunein, on the west bank of the Nile, on the borderline between Upper and Middle Egypt about 8km north-west of Mallawi, opposite Antinoopolis in Minia Governorate, Name: • In the ancient Egyptian language it was called Khemenu (Ḫmnw) which means ‘town of eight’, named after the Ogdoad. According to the Hermopolitan creation myth there were eight primeval deities (four frog-gods and four snake-goddeses) created the cosmos in Hermopolis. These deities symbolized different aspects of chaos before they eventually brought the primeval mound into being. Name: • In the Graeco-Roman Period the city was called Hermopolis which means "The City of Hermes" since the Greeks identified Hermes with Thoth, because the city was the main cult centre of Thoth, the Pharaonic god of magic, healing, and wisdom and the patron of scribes. • In coptic it was known as Shmun, from which the .is derived (اﻷﺷﻣوﻧﯾن :modern name el Ashmunein (Arabic Historical and archaeological importance of the city • It was the cult center of god Thoth, god of wisdom, healing and writing in ancient Egypt. • The city is associated with the Hermopolitan creation myth of the cosmos by the ogdoad.
    [Show full text]
  • Mummy Portraits in the J
    MUMMY PORTRAITS IN THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM By David L. Thompson Cat. no. 1. Portrait of a lady Photography of Getty Museum works of art by Donald Hull and Penny Potter 81.AP.42 Design by Tom Lombardi Encaustic on wood Typography by Marchese Graphics, Inc., Los Angeles H: 33.6 cm.; W: 17.2 cm. Printing by Alan Lithograph, Los Angeles H (of cartonnage): 46.4 cm.; W (of cartonnage): On top: 21.6 cm., © 1982 The J. Paul Getty Museum On bottom: 36.8 cm. 17985 Pacific Coast Highway (See pp. 32-33) Malibu, California 90265 Library of Congress catalogue number 82-81303 ISBN number 0-89236-038-0 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Thompson, David L. Mummy portraits in the ]. Paul Getty Museum. Rev. ed. of: The artists of the mummy portraits. © 1976. With new material added. Catalogue: p. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Mummy portraits—Catalogs. 2. Portraits, Roman—Egypt—Catalogs. 3- Mummy portraits— California—Malibu—Catalogs. 4. J. Paul Getty Museum—Catalogs. I. ]. Paul Getty Museum. II. Title. ND1327.E3T48 1982 757\9'0932074019493 82-81303 The introduction of this book is, in part, a revision of The Artists of the Mummy Portraits by David L. Thompson, published in 1976 by the J. Paul Getty Museum. Unless otherwise stated, the figures are reproduced from photographs supplied by the museums that own the objects. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1 Introduction 2 Recovery and provenience 3 Technical aspects 6 Use of the portraits 8 Chronology 10 The art market 12 Preservation and conservation 13 Portraits? 14 The painters *6 Other paintings 24 Conclusion 27 Notes 28 Catalogue: Mummy Portraits in the J.
    [Show full text]
  • Antinoite Citizenship Under Hadrian and Antoninus Pius a Prosopographical Study of the First Thirty Years of Antinoopolis
    Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 46 (2009) 81-96 Antinoite Citizenship under Hadrian and Antoninus Pius A Prosopographical Study of the First Thirty Years of Antinoopolis Myrto Malouta University of Oxford Abstract Prosopography of Antinoite citizens attested in 130-161 with com- ments about the composition of the citizen body. This paper is a prosopographical study of the first thirty years in the history of Antinoopolis and aims to identify the key issues associated with Antinoite citizenship under Hadrian and Antoninus Pius.1 Antinoopolis was founded by Hadrian in AD 130, during his extensive travels through the empire. The city was named after Hadrian’s favourite, Antinoos, a Greek boy from Bithynia, who had recently drowned in the Nile. The new foundation was much more than just a memorial to Antinoos, and the value attached to it by the emperor himself2 enhanced the political significance of the city.I ts importance persisted in the centuries that followed, and Antinoopolis even became the administra- tive capital of the province of the Thebaid in the Byzantine period. What was special about Antinoopolis in comparison with other Roman foundations3 was that it was designed to be a Greek polis. Apart from Alex- 1 I wish to thank Roger Bagnall for the invitation to participate in the Inaugural Sather Conference in Berkeley, where an earlier version of this paper was given. 2 For his new foundation Hadrian himself chose the site in Middle Egypt, opposite Hermopolis, where, according to Dio Cassius 69.11.3, Antinoos had drowned. 3 E. Kühn, Antinoopolis. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Hellenismus im römischen Ägypten (Göttingen 1913) 85, reports that W.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Jamshidi Oregon 0171N 12232.Pdf
    BUILDING A GOD: THE CULT OF ANTINOUS AND IDENTITY IN THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE by NIAYESH JAMSHIDI A THESIS Presented to the Department of Classics and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts June 2018 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Niayesh Jamshidi Title: Building a God: The Cult of Antinous and Identity in the Eastern Roman Empire This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Department of Classics by: Lowell Bowditch Chairperson Mary Jaeger Member and Sara D. Hodges Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2018 ii © 2018 Niayesh Jamshidi iii THESIS ABSTRACT Niayesh Jamshidi Master of Arts Department of Classics June 2018 Title: Building a God: The Cult of Antinous and Identity in the Eastern Roman Empire This thesis attempts to understand the distribution of Antinous worship in the Roman Empire and why he was worshipped. By examining the written sources and material culture available on Antinous, primary sources both pagan and Christian, and material culture such as the sculptures of Antinous, Antinoopolis and temples dedicated to Antinous, I came to the conclusion that Antinous was worshipped primary in the Eastern part of the Roman Empire. The Eastern part of the Roman Empire consisted of people who were of Greek descent. By examining Roman writings against Greek people and culture, I came to the conclusion that there were reasons that people worshipped Antinous.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the John Rylands Library
    ·· .. THE PRESENT POSITION OF PAPYROLOGY.1 BY B. P. GRENFELL, D.LITT., F.B.A., PROFF.sSOR OF PAPYR­ OLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD. HE conquest of Egypt by Alexander the Great in 332 B.c. T brought the country of the Pharaohs out of its comparative isolation into the main stream of European culture, which through Greece and Rome extends to our own day. Under the Ptolemies the most brilliant of the Hellenistic kingdoms, with Alexandria as the literary and scientific centre of the civilized world, under the Romans the richest and most important province of the Empire, under the earlier Byzantine Emperors foremost in the defence of T rinitarian Christianity and the foundation of Monasticism, Egypt had great in­ fluence on the history of the West for nearly a thousand years, until with the invasion of the Arabs in 640 the country was again isolated, not to return to the main stream until 1870, when once more, as the Khedive Ismail remarked at the opening of the Suez Canal, Egypt became part of Europe. The Ptolemies made Greek the official language, and under the Romans, who conquered Egypt in 30 B.C., but employed Latin only in the highest official and in military circles, a knowledge of Greek be­ came general, though ancient Egyptian continued to be spoken down to the third century, when in a Grrecised form it became the Coptic language, which lasted till the sixteenth century. Hence the great majority of papyri from Egypt, written between 300 B.C. and the middle of the seventh century, are in Greek, and though there are many written in demotic and Coptic, and a few in Latin, Hebrew, Syriac, Aramaic, and Pehlevi, papyrology has come to mean practically the study of Greek papyri, including various substitutes for papyrus as writing-material, such as ostraca (bits of broken pottery), wooden or wax tablets, and after the second century vellum.
    [Show full text]
  • Limestone and Sandstone Were the Principal Building Stones Employed by the Egyptians, While Anhydrite and Gypsum Were Also Used Along the Red Sea Coast
    UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Building Stones Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fd124g0 Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Author Harrell, James A. Publication Date 2012-05-31 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fd124g0#supplemental Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California BUILDING STONES أحجار البناء James A. Harrell EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Material Culture University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Harrell, 2012, Building Stones. UEE. Full Citation: Harrell, James A., 2012, Building Stones. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002c10gb 8751 Version 1, May 2012 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002c10gb BUILDING STONES أحجار البناء James A. Harrell Bausteine Pierre Construction The building stones of ancient Egypt are those relatively soft, plentiful rocks used to construct most temples, pyramids, and mastaba tombs. They were also employed for the interior passages, burial chambers, and outer casings of mud-brick pyramids and mastabas. Similarly, building stones were used in other mud-brick structures of ancient Egypt wherever extra strength was needed, such as bases for wood pillars, and lintels, thresholds, and jambs for doors. Limestone and sandstone were the principal building stones employed by the Egyptians, while anhydrite and gypsum were also used along the Red Sea coast. A total of 128 ancient quarries for building stones are known (89 for limestone, 36 for sandstone, and three for gypsum), but there are probably many others still undiscovered or destroyed by modern quarrying.
    [Show full text]