DOCSLIB.ORG

Dissonance Between Economic Reforms and Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dissonance Between Economic Reforms and Democracy SPECIAL ARTICLE Dissonance between Economic Reforms and Democracy Ashutosh Kumar The story of recent electoral democracy in India is one of here are two parts to the post-Soviet neoliberal and neo- a paradox. Most political parties affirm the necessity of conservative political theory. One of them is the assertion that there are no external challenges left either to free economic reforms. Yet, this affirmation belies support T market or to liberal democracy. This part is widely recognised for the same among large sections of the populace, and, even though grudgingly, its claim also widely accepted. The particularly the poor. Even more paradoxical is the fact other part is an assumption, not too explicitly stated and there- that political parties, despite their emphasis on policies fore not so frequently recognised. The assumption is that there is no internal tension between free market economy and liberal related to the economy in their respective manifestos, democracy. The two are in fact assumed to be not merely com- tend to rely on identity issues for mobilisation. This patible but also complementary. article tries to explain the reasons for this puzzle. So powerful and pervasive has been its propagation that the last two decades have witnessed a near universal acceptance of this belief. The result is that the promotion of free market and liberal democracy are unproblematically tied together. No less significantly, the political class in India, regardless of its party composition, has equally been keen on emphasising that economic reforms in India have been closely tied to a consistent practice of democracy. India’s twin success story is hailed, at home and abroad, espe- cially because very few post-colonial societies including the af- fluent ones have been able to dodge the pitfalls of “non-party, plebiscitary democracy and strong executive leadership grounded in populism”.1 The admiration is laced with a sense of amazement as India still lacks almost all the ingredients that are supposed to make democracy a success. Democracy in India qualifies to be “an ideal case for testing democratic theories”2 for it “is a phenomenon that, by most accounts, should not have existed, flourished or indeed, long endured”.3 Against the grain of such celebration, however, many percep- tive commentators have been issuing warnings that democracy is being viewed and judged primarily in its minimalist form, en- compassing nothing but a multiparty system, regularly held elec- tions, and peaceful transfer of power. Khilnani, for example, points out that “the meaning of democracy has been menacingly narrowed to signify only elections”.4 This is a revised and updated version of an article originally presented at This paper makes an attempt to underline the limits of mini- the conference on ‘Political Regimes, Economic Reforms, and Policy Pro- malist form of democracy in the Indian context by visiting its cesses in Indian States’ on March 20-22, 2006, organised by the Centre for electoral politics since the initiation of neoliberal economic reforms Economic and Social Studies, Hyderabad as part of the Governance and and taking note of the marked dissonance between the two. Policy Spaces Project. Comments from Bishnu Mohapatra and Jos Mooij were helpful. Bhupinder Brar, Ashutosh Varshney, Rammanohar Reddy, Assertion of the Marginal? Kailash K K and Janaki Srinivasan read the earlier drafts and offered incisive comments. The author thanks them all. A running theme in most studies of electoral politics in recent India is the phenomena designated as “democratic upsurge”.5 It Ashutosh Kumar ([email protected]) is at the department of refers to the mobilisation and politicisation of those social political science, Panjab University, Chandigarh. groups, which had for long remained politically dormant. These 54 january 5, 2008 Economic & Political Weekly SPECIAL ARTICLE groups were either economically poor or were identity groups, an equally steady opposition to privatisation of government which had been historically disadvantaged. Election studies companies. The average figures 35 and 47 in 1996 and 2004. have consistently showed that in the recent decades the turn- Among them, the percentage was larger in the case of socially out of these marginal sections has been higher than the aver- disadvantaged groups. The figures were 37 and 45 per cent age turnout. This increased turnout is taken as an indication of of the dalits and 30 and 42 per cent of the adivasis in 1996 political involvement and participation, leading to vast expan- and 2004. sion in the proportion of active citizens, which, in turn, has Now let us juxtapose this first fact with the second. The second caused unprecedented volatility of the electoral outcomes, fact is that major political parties had emphasised their un- forcing political parties to seek new forms of political align- ambiguous commitment to economic reforms in their election ments and support. manifestos of 2004. The general conclusion of these studies is that this volatility is good for democracy because it reflects increasing empowerment Party Commitment to Reforms of the poor and the marginal. How valid is such a claim? In order Congress Party’s manifesto titled ‘Congress Agenda for 2004-09’ to answer this question, we need to consider four facts that veer mentioned prominently its commitment to broaden and deepen around the ongoing process of economic reforms and underline economic reforms, to attain 8 to 10 per cent economic growth, to their implications. ensure efficiency and competitiveness in all production sectors. The first fact is that economic reforms have had no support For this purpose, the party promised incentives for increased among the poor and the marginal. In the large-scale National foreign direct investment (FDI). The party promised to continue Election Study (NES) undertaken by the Centre for the Study of with disinvestments though in a selective manner.7 Economic Developing Societies (CSDS) of parliamentary elections since reforms also figured prominently in the election manifesto of 1996,6 the electorate were repeatedly asked three different the BJP what was grandiosely called the vision document, the questions aimed at (a) determining the level of awareness party committed itself to “broaden and deepen” the process of about the economic reforms among the voters coming from liberalisation so that a modern and resurgent India could different sections of the society; (b) their opinion on the entry of emerge as the nerve centre of the global knowledge economy. the foreign companies in India; and (c) their views on the privati- The party also committed itself to make India a global manufac- sation of existing government companies/public sector units. turing hub. The 13-party BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) manifesto titled ‘Agenda for Development, Good Govern- Low Awareness ance and Peace’ proposed the following measures to be taken up: The data revealed that awareness about the economic reforms raising the foreign investment limits in the insurance sector, al- was abysmally low among the electorate even after a decade and lowing overseas investors to enter retailing, implementing an more of their initiation. If only 19 per cent of the respondents open sky policy and continuing the privatisation process includ- reported to have some idea of economic reforms in 1996, it ing the mining sector to “enhance and realise the hidden wealth was 26 per cent in 1998. Among those who were aware of the in the public sector undertakings”.8 The manifesto also promised reforms, the percentage of the dalits and adivasis was much to increase the FDI in the insurance sector and to continue the lower than that of other caste groups. Among the respondents, process of privatisation. So powerfully had the political senti- only 13 per cent of dalits and 6 per cent of adivasis had awareness ment swung towards privatisation that the mainstream left about the reforms in 1996 survey. The figures were 20 and 17 parties, namely, the CPI and CPI(M) which had otherwise respectively, in 1998. described reforms as anti-people and criticised other parties for A large segment of the Indian electorate had a negative adopting or endorsing them, did allow for disinvestments of the perception of the ongoing economic reform process. The NES of loss-making public sector units if it took place in transparent 2004 found that 44 per cent of the respondents, cutting across manner. Even “rational” labour reforms were accepted.9 class, caste and party lines, were of the opinion that the rich had benefited from the reforms whereas the poor had become Two Puzzles poorer. The upper caste respondents were split nearly equally The juxtaposition of facts one and two leave us with a puzzle. on the question but a very large portion of the respondents Why did political parties endorse economic reforms so strongly from the poor and peripheral groups viewed reforms as bene- when the sentiment among the electorate – among the poor ficiary only to the rich. Both the 1996 and 2004 data also re- and the marginal in particular – was so vehemently opposed to vealed the popular perception that the economic condition of such endorsement? The easiest explanation would be that the common people in the recent past had worsened. In 1996, parties miserably failed in gauging popular sentiment. The fate 53 per cent of the respondents held the government responsible of BJP’s “India Shining” campaign would encourage such a for increasing poverty whereas in 2004, 47 per cent held on to reading.10 But such an answer would beg a further question: the same opinion. why did all major parties fail equally in their attempt to read The question whether foreign companies should be allowed public mind? free trade in India was asked repeatedly in NES of 1996, 1998, A more complex explanation would be that the political parties 1999 and 2004.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in India
    International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 4158–4180 1932–8036/20170005 Fragile Hegemony: Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in India SUBIR SINHA1 School of Oriental and African Studies, London, UK Direct and unmediated communication between the leader and the people defines and constitutes populism. I examine how social media, and communicative practices typical to it, function as sites and modes for constituting competing models of the leader, the people, and their relationship in contemporary Indian politics. Social media was mobilized for creating a parliamentary majority for Narendra Modi, who dominated this terrain and whose campaign mastered the use of different platforms to access and enroll diverse social groups into a winning coalition behind his claims to a “developmental sovereignty” ratified by “the people.” Following his victory, other parties and political formations have established substantial presence on these platforms. I examine emerging strategies of using social media to criticize and satirize Modi and offering alternative leader-people relations, thus democratizing social media. Practices of critique and its dissemination suggest the outlines of possible “counterpeople” available for enrollment in populism’s future forms. I conclude with remarks about the connection between activated citizens on social media and the fragility of hegemony in the domain of politics more generally. Keywords: Modi, populism, Twitter, WhatsApp, social media On January 24, 2017, India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), proudly tweeted that Narendra Modi, its iconic prime minister of India, had become “the world’s most followed leader on social media” (see Figure 1). Modi’s management of—and dominance over—media and social media was a key factor contributing to his convincing win in the 2014 general election, when he led his party to a parliamentary majority, winning 31% of the votes cast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saffron Wave Meets the Silent Revolution: Why the Poor Vote for Hindu Nationalism in India
    THE SAFFRON WAVE MEETS THE SILENT REVOLUTION: WHY THE POOR VOTE FOR HINDU NATIONALISM IN INDIA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Tariq Thachil August 2009 © 2009 Tariq Thachil THE SAFFRON WAVE MEETS THE SILENT REVOLUTION: WHY THE POOR VOTE FOR HINDU NATIONALISM IN INDIA Tariq Thachil, Ph. D. Cornell University 2009 How do religious parties with historically elite support bases win the mass support required to succeed in democratic politics? This dissertation examines why the world’s largest such party, the upper-caste, Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has experienced variable success in wooing poor Hindu populations across India. Briefly, my research demonstrates that neither conventional clientelist techniques used by elite parties, nor strategies of ideological polarization favored by religious parties, explain the BJP’s pattern of success with poor Hindus. Instead the party has relied on the efforts of its ‘social service’ organizational affiliates in the broader Hindu nationalist movement. The dissertation articulates and tests several hypotheses about the efficacy of this organizational approach in forging party-voter linkages at the national, state, district, and individual level, employing a multi-level research design including a range of statistical and qualitative techniques of analysis. In doing so, the dissertation utilizes national and author-conducted local survey data, extensive interviews, and close observation of Hindu nationalist recruitment techniques collected over thirteen months of fieldwork. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Tariq Thachil was born in New Delhi, India. He received his bachelor’s degree in Economics from Stanford University in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • India's 2004 National Elections
    Order Code RL32465 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web India’s 2004 National Elections July 12, 2004 nae redacted Analyst in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress India’s 2004 National Elections Summary U.S. relations with India depend largely on India’s political leadership. India’s 2004 national elections ended governance by the center-right coalition headed by Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and brought in a new center-left coalition led by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Following the upset victory for the historically-dominant Indian National Congress Party led by Sonia Gandhi, Gandhi declined the post of Prime Minister in the new left-leaning United Progressive Alliance (UPA) coalition government, instead nominating her party lieutenant, Oxford-educated economist Manmohan Singh, for the job. As Finance Minister from 1991-1996, Singh was the architect of major Indian economic reform and liberalization efforts. On May 22, the widely-esteemed Sikh became India’s first- ever non-Hindu Prime Minister. The defeated Bharatiya Janata Party now sits in opposition at the national level, led in Parliament by former Deputy Prime Minister Lal Advani. A coalition of communist parties supports the UPA, but New Delhi’s economic, foreign, and security policies are not expected to be significantly altered. The new government has vowed to continue close and positive engagement with the United States in all areas. This report, which will not be updated,
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    ASIA PROGRAM Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004-3027 www.wilsoncenter.org/asia Cover Image: David Talukdar / Shutterstock.com Copyright 2019 All Rights Reserved Preface In 2019, Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) achieved an overwhelming victory in India’s national election. It marked the second such election in a row that resulted in such a resounding triumph for the BJP, a Hindu nationalist party. While the BJP’s win may not have been a surprise—it had been favored by many to win, particularly with the opposition Congress Party having struggled to mount a strong campaign—the large margin of victory was quite striking. In the months leading up to the election, the BJP had looked vulnerable, thanks in great part to several losses in state elections and to soaring unemployment rates. And yet the BJP still managed to pull off a second consecutive dramatic electoral win. How did the BJP get to this point, where it has become the undisputed juggernaut of Indian national politics? This new report, prepared by former Wilson Center public policy fellow Kalyani Shankar, a veteran journalist and political analyst, breaks down the factors that helped account for the BJP’s two electoral triumphs. More broadly, the report demonstrates how the party has evolved over the years, starting from its earliest days, and how it has set itself apart from its rivals. The report also discusses the Indian political right in the context of a current global trend that has seen the rise and triumph of conservative and nationalist political parties and leaders in many different parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiv Sena – BJP – Congress Party – Elections
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IND31712 Country: India Date: 1 May 2007 Keywords: India – Gujarat – Shiv Sena – BJP – Congress Party – Elections This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Please provide information on Shiv Sena / BJP in Gujarat and its relationship with the Congress party. 2. Please provide brief information on election results in Gujarat since 2000. RESPONSE 1. Please provide info on Shiv Sena / BJP in Gujarat and its relationship with the Congress party. The Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) has been in power in the Indian state of Gujarat since 1998. According to Question 4 of RRT Country Research Response IND31126 of 19 December 2006, “in 1998, the BJP won one hundred and seventeen seats in the state legislature compared to the Congress, which won only fifty three. In the December 2002 elections, the BJP secured one hundred and twenty seven seats whereas the total share of seats for the Congress declined from fifty three to fifty”. Question 1 of RRT Country Research Response IND30469 of 11 August 2006 noted that “the Shiv Sena presently holds no seats in the Gujarat Legislative Assembly, though is a leading force in the legislative assembly of the neighbouring state of Maharashtra”. Nevertheless, according to Question 1 of the RRT Country Research Response IND30864 of 7 November 2006, the Shiv Sena and its coalition partner, the BJP, hold power in the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai, which is the capital of Maharashtra (RRT Country Research Response 2006, Research Response IND31126, 19 December – Attachment 1; RRT Country Research Response 2006, Research Response IND30469, 11 August – Attachment 2; RRT Country Research Response 2006, Research Response IND30864, 7 November – Attachment 3).
    [Show full text]
  • How the 2004 Lok Sabha Election Was Lost
    July 2004 How the 2004 Lok Sabha election was lost Gareth Price Summary • Surprise at the outcome of the 2004 Indian general election was more pronounced because of the confidence of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that it would be returned to power. The government had taken the decision to call an early election from what it thought was a position of strength. In retrospect, its complacency proved to be its undoing. The government’s “India Shining” message played to its core supporters and, in effect, encouraged the rejection of poorly-performing MPs. The BJP’s over- confidence led it to alienate its allies, while Congress, which expected to lose, was keener to formalise alliances. • While the BJP performed poorly, its remaining allies in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) performed worse. In just two states, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, the NDA lost 51 seats, the bulk of the seats being lost by the BJP’s regional allies. Although the BJP benefitted from anti- incumbency in some states, had it maintained its existing alliances and articulated a more inclusive message there is little doubt that it would have remained the largest party, changing the entire political dynamic. • The new government faces a host of challenges. Its survival will depend on how members of the coalition balance their desire for secular government with the implementation of their particular economic or social policies. Congress’ ability to manage a coalition, particularly in the run-up to state elections, and personal ambitions of other politicians within the coalition will also determine whether the government survives.
    [Show full text]
  • India April 2006
    COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT INDIA APRIL 2006 RDS-IND COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE INDIA APRIL 2006 Contents Paragraphs 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT .................................................................... 1.01 2. GEOGRAPHY .................................................................................. 2.01 3. ECONOMY ...................................................................................... 3.01 4. HISTORY ........................................................................................ 4.01 1991 to present ........................................................................... 4.01 Congress (I) and economic reform................................................ 4.01 Emergence of BJP........................................................................ 4.02 Tension with Pakistan................................................................... 4.04 Religious strife .............................................................................. 4.19 General elections 2004................................................................. 4.25 State assembly elections .............................................................. 4.29 Indian Ocean Tsunami – 26 December 2004................................ 4.37 Heavy snow and avalanches ........................................................ 4.43 Monsoon....................................................................................... 4.44 EARTHQUAKE - 2005…………………………………………………….4.47 Disaster management..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Khairlanji Murders & India's Hidden Apartheid ANAND
    ** persistence «• The Khairlanji Murders & India's Hidden Apartheid ANAND TELTUMBDE This book exposes the gangrenous heart of Indian society. ARUNDHATI ROY © Anand Teltumbde's analysis of the public, ritualistic massacre of a dalit family in 21st century India exposes the gangrenous heart of our society. It contextualizes the massacre and describes the manner in which the social, political and state machinery, the police, the mass media and the judiciary all collude to first create the climate for such bestiality, and then cover it up. This is not a book about the last days of relict feudalism, but a book about what modernity means in India. It discusses one of the most important issues in contemporary India. —ARUNDHATI ROY, author of The God of Small Things This book is finally the perfect demonstration that the caste system of India is the best tool to perpetuate divisions among the popular classes to the benefit of the rulers, thus annihilating in fact the efficiency of their struggles against exploitation and oppression. Capitalist modernization is not gradually reducing that reality but on the opposite aggravating its violence. This pattern of modernization permits segments of the peasant shudras to accede to better conditions through the over-exploitation of the dalits. The Indian Left must face this major challenge. It must have the courage to move into struggles for the complete abolition of caste system, no less. This is the prerequisite for the eventual emerging of a united front of the exploited classes, the very first condition for the coming to reality of any authentic popular democratic alternative for social progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Between the RSS, the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Vidya Bharati Schools in India
    Religions and Development Research Programme Religious Political Parties and their Welfare Work: Relations between the RSS, the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Vidya Bharati Schools in India Padmaja Nair Working Paper 37 - 2009 Religions and Development Research Programme The Religions and Development Research Programme Consortium is an international research partnership that is exploring the relationships between several major world religions, development in low-income countries and poverty reduction. The programme is comprised of a series of comparative research projects that are addressing the following questions: z How do religious values and beliefs drive the actions and interactions of individuals and faith-based organisations? z How do religious values and beliefs and religious organisations influence the relationships between states and societies? z In what ways do faith communities interact with development actors and what are the outcomes with respect to the achievement of development goals? The research aims to provide knowledge and tools to enable dialogue between development partners and contribute to the achievement of development goals. We believe that our role as researchers is not to make judgements about the truth or desirability of particular values or beliefs, nor is it to urge a greater or lesser role for religion in achieving development objectives. Instead, our aim is to produce systematic and reliable knowledge and better understanding of the social world. The research focuses on four countries (India, Pakistan, Nigeria and Tanzania), enabling the research team to study most of the major world religions: Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism and African traditional belief systems. The research projects will compare two or more of the focus countries, regions within the countries, different religious traditions and selected development activities and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hindu Rashtra’ Sought by Hindu Nationalists?
    Is India Becoming the ‘Hindu Rashtra’ Sought by Hindu Nationalists? John Harriss, Craig Jeffrey and Stuart Corbridge Simons Papers in Security and Development No. 60/2017 | December 2017 Simons Papers in Security and Development No. 60/2017 2 The Simons Papers in Security and Development are edited and published at the School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University. The papers serve to disseminate research work in progress by the School’s faculty and associated and visiting scholars. Our aim is to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. Inclusion of a paper in the series should not limit subsequent publication in any other venue. All papers can be downloaded free of charge from our website, www.sfu.ca/internationalstudies. The series is supported by the Simons Foundation. Series editor: Jeffrey T. Checkel Managing editor: Martha Snodgrass Harriss, John, Craig Jeffrey and Stuart Corbridge, Is India Becoming the ‘Hindu Rashtra’ Sought by Hindu Nationalists? Simons Papers in Security and Development, No. 60/2017, School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, December 2017. ISSN 1922-5725 Copyright remains with the author. Reproduction for other purposes than personal research, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), the title, the working paper number and year, and the publisher. Copyright for this issue: John Harriss, jharriss(at)sfu.ca; Craig Jeffrey, craig.jeffrey(at)unimelb.edu.au; Stuart Corbridge, vice.chancellor(at)durham.ac.uk. School for International Studies Simon Fraser University Suite 7200 - 515 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6B 5K3 Is India Becoming the ‘Hindu Rashtra’ Sought by Hindu Nationalists? 3 Is India Becoming the ‘Hindu Rashtra’ Sought by Hindu Nationalists? Simons Papers in Security and Development No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of BJP in India: a Critical Review
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 25, Issue 2, Series. 9 (February. 2020) 55-61 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of BJP in India: A Critical Review Saddam Hosen Lecturer, Department of International Relations Bangabandhu SheikhMujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj, Bangladesh. Abstract: India is considered as new emerging great power in international politics that has significant implications for the world great powers. It is also considered as great regional power in Asia particularly in South Asia because of its exceptional economic, military and cultural power around the world. After its independence from British colonial rule in 1947, India emerged as secular state based on the notion of secular democracy around the country as well as the largest democratic country in the world. Under the leadership of Nehru, the national congress formed the government of India for the first time and started dominating the Indian political system. After that Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) emerged as political party in the late 1980s and BJP became one of the dominant political parties by the year of 1999 in Indian politics and formed BJP-led coalition government with other Hindu nationalist groups along with the support ofRashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) based on the concept of Hindu nationalism for making India as Hindu State. In the general election of 2014, BJP came into the power brilliantly obtaining the majority seats where congress lost in the election poorly. Finally, BJP came to the power again in the general election of 2019 under the leadership of Narendra Modi.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism, Hindutva and Gender: Convergence and Contradictions in the Provision of Welfare Amrita Chhachhi*
    Feminist Dissent Neoliberalism, Hindutva and Gender: Convergence and Contradictions in the Provision of Welfare Amrita Chhachhi* *Correspondence: chhachhi@ iss.nl Abstract This article explores the convergence and contradictions between the two hegemonic projects of neoliberalism and Hindutva and the reinforcement/reconstruction of patriarchal gender relations in relation to welfare. Analysis of some key social policies and specific legal interventions show the fusion of the two in the construction of the family/nation/gender related to population regulation, governance of populations, the forging of a paternal contract, the move from welfare to financialization and the Peer review: This article undermining of labour rights through regulatory and disciplinary labour has been subject to a double blind peer review codes. The convergence of neoliberalism and Hindutva results in a shift process from rights-based entitlements to further commodification, digital financialization and the creation of a hindutvatised neoliberal subjectivity. © Copyright: The Keywords: Neoliberal authoritarianism, Hindutva, Welfare, Gender, Authors. This article is issued under the terms of Labour the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial Share Alike License, which permits use and redistribution of This article explores the links between neoliberalism, Hindutva and gender the work provided that the original author and relations in India in relation to the provision of welfare. There are multiple source are credited, the contradictory processes within the projects of neoliberalism and Hindutva work is not used for commercial purposes and and their implications for existing patriarchal structures and gender that any derivative works are made available under relations. Although many analysts have posited a seamless convergence the same license terms.
    [Show full text]