General Assembly Distr.: General Sixty-Ninth Session 19 January 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Assembly Distr.: General Sixty-Ninth Session 19 January 2015 United Nations A/C.3/69/SR.43 General Assembly Distr.: General Sixty-ninth session 19 January 2015 Official Records Original: English Third Committee Summary record of the 43rd meeting Held at Headquarters, New York, on Tuesday, 11 November 2014, at 10 a.m. Chair: Mr. Davis .................................................... (Jamaica) Contents Agenda item 66: Elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance (continued) (a) Elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance (continued) Agenda item 67: Right of peoples to self-determination (continued) Agenda item 68: Promotion and protection of human rights (continued) (b) Human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms (continued) (c) Human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives (continued) This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be sent as soon as possible, under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned, to the Chief of the Documents Control Unit ([email protected]), and incorporated in a copy of the record. Corrected records will be reissued electronically on the Official Document System of the United Nations (http://documents.un.org). 14-64468 (E) *1464468* A/C.3/69/SR.43 The meeting was called to order at 10.05 a.m. coalition participants in national liberation movements. Such actions, as well as the erecting of monuments for Agenda item 66: Elimination of racism, racial Nazis, the designation of days commemorating discrimination, xenophobia and related liberation from Nazism as days of mourning and intolerance (continued) attempting to demolish monuments erected in remembrance of those who had fought against Nazism, (a) Elimination of racism, racial discrimination, were not only blasphemous with regard to veterans of xenophobia and related intolerance (continued) the anti-fascist movement, but also played into the (A/C.3/69/L.56 and A/C.3/69/L.57) hands of those who advocated “racial purity” and Draft resolution A/C.3/69/L.56: Combating glorification discrimination on racial or ethnic grounds, not to of Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling mention the poor example they gave to the younger contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, generation. xenophobia and related intolerance 5. Almost seventy years since the defeat of Nazism 1. Mr. Lukiyantsev (Russian Federation), in the Second World War, attempts were still being introducing the draft resolution, said that Bangladesh, made to falsify history. It was unacceptable to attempt India, Niger, Rwanda, Seychelles and Sri Lanka had to review or downplay the assessment of that ideology joined the sponsors. The sponsors would prepare an as set out in the documents of the Nuremberg Trials, updated draft resolution on the basis of the proposals which had clearly and unequivocally condemned the made by delegations. crimes of those who had violated the rights and dignity of persons and denied the principle of equality of 2. It would soon be ten years since the Russian persons regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion or Federation had first introduced the initiative on language. It was States’ shared duty to preserve the combating glorification of Nazism for the memory of those who had given their lives for a future consideration of the General Assembly. However, free from Nazism and fascism. events since the adoption of General Assembly resolution 68/150 on that matter demonstrated that the 6. Ms. Sharma (Secretary of the Committee) said initiative had unfortunately become no less relevant. that Brazil and Myanmar had joined the sponsors. Support for the resolution had increased from year to year, showing that the threat of the problems was being Draft resolution A/C.3/69/L.57: International Convention recognized across the globe. All sponsors of the on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination resolution fully supported the Special Rapporteur on 7. Ms. Frankinet (Belgium), speaking also on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, behalf of Slovenia, introduced the draft resolution. xenophobia and related intolerance. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Morocco, Turkey and 3. The negative consequences of the global financial Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) had joined the and economic crisis had strengthened the positions of sponsors. The main sponsors had decided to make the right-wing forces, political parties and various kinds of text into a procedural document, and it would extremist movements, which were increasingly drawn henceforth only deal with the four key elements for the to Nazi and neo-Nazi ideology. Attacks on and implementation of the International Convention on the violence towards national, ethnic, linguistic and Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. religious minorities, immigrants and refugees had 8. She welcomed the fact that General Assembly become more frequent. Racist slogans were becoming resolution 68/268 on strengthening and enhancing the an increasingly common part of political platforms and effective functioning of the human rights treaty body parties, while aggressive nationalism was often system had granted the Committee on the Elimination accepted as a permanent feature of so-called of Racial Discrimination a week of additional meeting democratic election campaigns. time to catch up with the backlog of reports. In order 4. The vaccination against Nazism and fascism for the fight against racial discrimination to be clearly needed a boost. Recently in Europe there had effective, the Convention must have political support been attempts to declare those who had collaborated and be implemented in law as widely as possible. In with the fascist movement against the anti-Hitler that regard, the Secretary-General had been invited to 2/8 14-64468 A/C.3/69/SR.43 continue his work on the report on the status of Uganda and Zambia had joined the sponsors. The text ratification of the Convention. All member States were of the draft resolution remained unchanged from that urged to ratify the amendment to the Convention of General Assembly resolution 67/157, which had relating to the financial situation of the Committee. It been adopted by consensus in the previous year, with would be possible to monitor the status of payments merely technical updates. In the text, the General due to the Committee more efficiently through the Assembly reaffirmed the fundamental status of the report of the Secretary-General on the financial right to self-determination as a precondition for the situation of the Committee, in which member States effective guarantee and observance of other human that were in arrears were urged to fulfil their rights, declared its opposition to acts of foreign outstanding financial obligations. In the text of the military intervention, aggression and occupation and draft resolution, the General Assembly invited the deplored the plight of millions of refugees and Secretary-General to present an annual report on the internally displaced persons who had been uprooted as fight against all forms of racial discrimination. a result of such acts. 9. Ms. Sharma (Secretary of the Committee) said Agenda item 68: Promotion and protection of human that Albania, Andorra, India, Israel, Monaco, Panama rights (continued) and San Marino had joined the sponsors. (b) Human rights questions, including alternative Agenda item 67: Right of peoples to self- approaches for improving the effective determination (continued) (A/C.3/69/L.53 enjoyment of human rights and fundamental and A/C.3/69/L55) freedoms (continued) (A/C.3/69/L.26, A/C.3/69/L.34,A/C.3/69/L.35, A/C.3/69/L.39, Draft resolution A/C.3/69/L.53: Use of mercenaries as A/C.3/69/L.40, A/C.3/69/L.41, A/C.3/69/L.42, a means of violating human rights and impeding the A/C.3/69/L.43 and A/C.3/69/L.47) exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination. Draft resolution A/C.3/69/L.26: The right to privacy in 10. Ms. Moreno Guerra (Cuba) said that the draft the digital age resolution drew attention to the serious problem of the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human 13. Mr. Antonio de Aguiar Patriota (Brazil), rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples speaking also on behalf of Germany, introduced the to self-determination. It was important to prepare, draft resolution, which followed up on General present and discuss concrete proposals on potential Assembly resolution 68/167, which had been adopted rules or guidelines to fill existing gaps, promote greater by consensus in 2013. The report of the Office of the protection of human rights, particularly the right of United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights peoples to self-determination, and tackle current (OHCHR) on the right to privacy in the digital age threats relating to mercenaries or mercenary-related (A/HRC/27/37), submitted in accordance with activities, such as the actions of military and private resolution 68/167, had confirmed that many States security enterprises. Algeria, Belarus, China, lacked adequate national legislation and had weak Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, El Salvador, procedural safeguards and ineffective oversight India, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Nigeria, Russian mechanisms for their monitoring and surveillance Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and programmes, all of which had contributed to a lack of Zimbabwe had joined the sponsors. accountability for arbitrary or unlawful interference with the right to privacy. The report had stressed the 11. Ms. Sharma (Secretary of the Committee) said need for an in-depth analysis of those issues, practical that Egypt, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Libya, guidance on the principles of necessity, proportionality Myanmar, Niger, Sri Lanka and Uganda had joined the and legitimacy in relation to surveillance practices, and sponsors. effective remedies for those whose rights had been violated.
Recommended publications
  • Access Resource
    The State of Justice Syria 2020 The State of Justice Syria 2020 Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) March 2020 About the Syria Justice and Accountability Centre The Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) strives to prevent impunity, promote redress, and facilitate principled reform. SJAC works to ensure that human rights violations in Syria are comprehensively documented and preserved for use in transitional justice and peace-building. SJAC collects documentation of violations from all available sources, stores it in a secure database, catalogues it according to human rights standards, and analyzes it using legal expertise and big data methodologies. SJAC also supports documenters inside Syria, providing them with resources and technical guidance, and coordinates with other actors working toward similar aims: a Syria defined by justice, respect for human rights, and rule of law. Learn more at SyriaAccountability.org The State of Justice in Syria, 2020 March 2020, Washington, D.C. Material from this publication may be reproduced for teach- ing or other non-commercial purposes, with appropriate attribution. No part of it may be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes without the prior express permission of the copyright holders. Cover Photo — A family flees from ongoing violence in Idlib, Northwest Syria. (C) Lens Young Dimashqi TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Major Violations 7 Targeting of Hospitals and Schools 8 Detainees and Missing Persons 8 Violations in Reconciled Areas 9 Property Rights
    [Show full text]
  • Autocatalytic Models of Counter-Terrorism in East and Southeast Asia: an International Comparative Analysis of China, Indonesia, and Thailand
    \\jciprod01\productn\J\JLE\50-3\JLE301.txt unknown Seq: 1 12-JUN-18 10:37 AUTOCATALYTIC MODELS OF COUNTER-TERRORISM IN EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CHINA, INDONESIA, AND THAILAND DR. MARK D. KIELSGARD* AND TAM HEY JUAN JULIAN** ABSTRACT This Article argues that counter-terrorism policies and formal law in many states in the East and Southeast Asian region are feeding the cur- rent spike in terror activity rather than reducing it. Regional govern- ment’s unrelated policy objectives and failure to implement or comply with norms conducive to fair treatment of “at risk” communities and their failure to adopt a prospective approach to countering terrorism is making the problem worse. This Article employs a comparative methodol- ogy of key states in the region, including China and its marginalization and forcible assimilation of minority Uighur populations; Indonesia and its radicalized majority population under a sympathetic or tolerant leadership; and Thailand, a country locked in internal strife with domestic elements seeking self-determination. It will first discuss contem- porary models of counter-terrorism, then detail relevant measures adopted in the subject states followed by an analysis concluding that, though differing in specific initiatives, these states share a functional commonal- ity motivated by objectives unrelated to counter-terrorism leading to a resultant commonality of increased terror activity. Moreover, these argu- ments are equally relevant to other countries in the region such as the Philippines and Malaysia. INTRODUCTION Terrorism is a real threat in the East and Southeast Asian region (the Region). After the 9/11 attacks in the United States, it was * Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Terrorism and Terror in Syria's Civil
    C O R P O R A T I O N CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Browse Reports & Bookstore TERRORISM AND Make a charitable contribution HOMELAND SECURITY For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Testimony View document details Testimonies RAND testimonies record testimony presented by RAND associates to federal, state, or local legislative committees; government-appointed commissions and panels; and private review and oversight bodies. Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. Testimony The Role of Terrorism and Terror in Syria’s Civil War Brian Michael Jenkins RAND Office of External Affairs CT-402 November 2013 Testimony presented before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade on November 20, 2013 This product is part of the RAND Corporation testimony series.
    [Show full text]
  • ISIS Child Soldiers in Syria: the Structural and Predatory Recruitment, Enlistment, Pre-Training Indoctrination, Training, and Deployment
    ICCT Research paper February 2018 DOI: 10.19165/2018.1.14 ISSN: 2468-0656 ISIS Child Soldiers in Syria: The Structural and Predatory Recruitment, Enlistment, Pre-Training Indoctrination, Training, and Deployment Author: Asaad Almohammad Research on the engagement of children with the so-called Islamic State (a.k.a. ISIS) relies heavily on the analysis of obtained ISIS documents and ISIS-disseminated propaganda, leaving major elements of the recruitment and deployment process uncovered. Such ambiguities hinder future efforts aimed at dealing with ISIS' child soldiers. As such, an intensive effort to compile data using interviews and naturalistic observations across ISIS- held territories in Syria was made to exhaustively explore the process of child recruitment and deployment by ISIS. Findings suggest that there are two methods of recruitment: predatory and structural. The enlistment, intensity of indoctrination, types of training, and nature of deployment were found to depend, to a high degree, on the type of recruitment (i.e., predatory or structural), and category of children based on their origin (i.e., local, Middle Eastern and North African [MENA], or foreign) and if they are orphans. The data shows that the separation between children and adults’ roles/assignments is diminishing. After a thorough exploration of the elements of ISIS’ recruitment and deployment process, this paper argues its findings, implications, and limitations. ICCT Research Paper Asaad Almohammad Introduction Existing research on ISIS indoctrination and deployment of children is largely extrapolated from obtained ISIS documents and disseminated propaganda.1 Although previous research efforts have provided invaluable insights into ISIS child soldiering and traumatization, their utilized data was associated with multiple caveats, and thus, left major elements and phases of child recruitment and deployment unexplored.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Or Simply the Islamic State, Has Carried out Deadly Terrorist Attacks
    BACKGROUND REPORT Patterns of Islamic State-Related Terrorism, 2002--2015 For more than a decade, the organization now known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), or simply the Islamic State, has carried out deadly terrorist attacks. Beginning as a small network led by Jordanian Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the first terrorist attack attributed to this group was the assassination of American diplomat Laurence Foley in Amman, Jordan in October 2002. Since then, the group initially known as Tawhid and Jihad (Jama’at al-Tawhid w’al-Jihad (the Party of Monotheism and Jihad)) has undergone a complex evolution, including name changes, leadership changes, and shifts in allegiance to other Salafi-jihadist organizations, most notably al-Qaida. In addition, the reach of ISIL’s violence surpasses its own membership, to include attacks carried out by other groups and individuals who have pledged allegiance to ISIL regardless of whether or not formal ties exist. This complexity makes it difficult to comprehensively and systematically place into context the violence of one of the most active and deadly terrorist organizations in recent history. For the purpose of this report, we have classified the terrorist attacks in the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) into four ISIL-related perpetrator categories: ISIL Predecessor: attacks by organizations that were part of the ISIL lineage prior to adoption of the ISIL name in 2013 ISIL: attacks by operatives of the “core” of the organization, based in and primarily active in Iraq and Syria ISIL Affiliate: attacks by organizations that have declared allegiance to ISIL1 ISIL-Inspired: attacks by individuals who have indicated that they were motivated by allegiance to ISIL ISIL-Related: any of the above This report presents data that illustrate the dynamics of ISIL-related terrorism over time and place, from 2002 to 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 25 Putin’s Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket by John W. Parker Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for Technology and National Security Policy. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier, August, 2012 (Russian Ministry of Defense) Putin's Syrian Gambit Putin's Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket By John W. Parker Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 25 Series Editor: Denise Natali National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. July 2017 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Syria: Playing Into Their Hands
    Syria Playing into their hands Regime and international roles in fuelling violence and fundamentalism in the Syrian war DAVID KEEN Syria Playing into their hands Regime and international roles in fuelling violence and fundamentalism in the Syrian war DAVID KEEN About the author David Keen is a political economist and Professor of Conflict Studies at the London School of Economics (LSE), where he has worked since 1997. He is the author of several books on conflict and related problems, includingUseful Enemies, Complex Emergencies, Endless War? and The Benefits of Famine. Saferworld published a discussion paper by Professor Keen in 2015 entitled Dilemmas of counter-terror, stabilisation and statebuilding, on which this paper builds. Acknowledgements This discussion paper was commissioned as part of Saferworld’s work to challenge counterproductive responses to crises and critical threats and promote peacebuilding options. It has been managed and edited by Larry Attree and Jordan Street for Saferworld. Very valuable comments and advice, on all or parts of the text, were additionally provided by Rana Khalaf, Henry Smith, Fawaz Gerges, Rajesh Venugopal, Stuart Gordon, Paul Kingston, Sune Haugbolle, Leonie Northedge, Shelagh Daley and David Alpher. Any errors are solely the responsibility of the author. The author is grateful to Mary Kaldor at LSE for supporting the fieldwork component of this research, funded by the European Research Council. I am particularly grateful to Ali Ali for his guidance and inside knowledge during fieldwork on the Turkey-Syria border and for subsequent comments. Some people have helped greatly with this report who cannot be individually acknowledged for security reasons and my sincere gratitude extends to them.
    [Show full text]
  • “Global Terrorism Index: 2015.” Institute for Economics and Peace
    MEASURING AND UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF TERRORISM Quantifying Peace and its Benefits The Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank dedicated to shifting the world’s focus to peace as a positive, achievable, and tangible measure of human well-being and progress. IEP achieves its goals by developing new conceptual frameworks to define peacefulness; providing metrics for measuring peace; and uncovering the relationships between business, peace and prosperity as well as promoting a better understanding of the cultural, economic and political factors that create peace. IEP has offices in Sydney, New York and Mexico City. It works with a wide range of partners internationally and collaborates with intergovernmental organizations on measuring and communicating the economic value of peace. For more information visit www.economicsandpeace.org SPECIAL THANKS to the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) headquartered at the University of Maryland for their cooperation on this study and for providing the Institute for Economics and Peace with their Global Terrorism Database (GTD) datasets on terrorism. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 ABOUT THE GLOBAL TERRORISM INDEX 6 1 RESULTS 9 Global Terrorism Index map 10 Terrorist incidents map 12 Ten countries most impacted by terrorism 20 Terrorism compared to other forms of violence 30 2 TRENDS 33 Changes in the patterns and characteristics of terrorist activity 34 Terrorist group trends 38 Foreign fighters in Iraq
    [Show full text]
  • PERSPECTIVES on TERRORISM Volume 11
    ISSN 2334-3745 Volume XI, Issue 2 April 2017 PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 11. Issue 2 Table of Contents Welcome from the Editors..................................................................................................................1 Articles A Mixed Methods Empirical Examination of Changes in Emphasis and Style in the Extremist Magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah .....................................................................................2 by Peter Wignell, Sabine Tan, Kay L. O’Halloran & Rebecca Lange Managing Non-State Threats with Cumulative Deterrence-by-Denial...................................21 by Charles P. Kirchofer Research Notes Tracking Radical Opinions in Polls of U.S. Muslims ................................................................36 by Veronika Fajmonová, Sophia Moskalenko and Clark McCauley The Ambiguous Effect of Population Size on the Prevalence of Terrorism ..........................49 by James M. Lutz and Brenda J. Lutz The Tranquillity Campaign: A Beacon of Light in the Dark World Wide Web ...................58 by Abdullah bin Khaled al Saud Resources Bibliography: Conflict in Syria (Part 3) .......................................................................................65 Compiled and selected by Judith Tinnes Online Resources for the Analysis of Terrorism and Related Subjects.................................108 Compiled and Selected by Berto Jongman Book Review: Shabnam J.Holliday. and Philip Leech (Eds.)Political Identities and Popular Uprisings in the Middle East (2016)............................................................................................136
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethical Code of Conduct for the Non-Proliferation of Biological Agents Among Malaysian Businesses
    2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), August 25 - 27, 2015, Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia An Ethical Code of Conduct for the Non-proliferation of Biological Agents Among Malaysian Businesses Marina Abdul Majid*+1, Nor Anita Abdullah#2 *School of History, Politics and Strategic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor, MALAYSIA [email protected]/[email protected] +Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (UM), 50603 Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA #College of Law, Government and International Studies (COLGIS), Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman, MALAYSIA [email protected] Abstract—Currently, export control monitoring of the [3: 1]. Export controls are implemented to restrict illegal proliferation of biological agents in Malaysia falls within the technology and weapons, promote regional stability and human ambit of the Strategic Trade Act 2010 (STA 2010), a law drafted rights considerations, and prevent the proliferation of Weapons by Malaysia’s Ministry of International Trade and Industry of Mass Destruction (WMDs), especially for the purpose of (MITI). At the same time, businesses in Malaysia have not gone international terrorism [3: 1]. Defined as “[m]easures to so far as to initiate an ethical code of conduct to prevent prevent the spread of biological, chemical, and/or nuclear biological agents from being proliferated for bioterrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Terrorism in Syria Report
    Counterterrorism in Syria: Three Potential Scenarios for 2015 Prepared for: The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) Washington, DC Research and Analysis Conducted by: Jacob Brahce · Jessica Koloini · Reginald Thompson Patrick Issa · Chandra Caldwell ·Gabriel Bedingfield Brett Ayers · Garrett VanderGrinten · Caitlin Harwood Supervising Faculty: Prof. Richard C. Mac Namee, QCVS Submitted on: May 07th, 2013 George Bush School of Government and Public Service Texas A&M University · College Station, TX 77843-4350 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... 3 Scope Notes ................................................................................................ 4 Scenario 1: Assad Regime Survives ............................................................. 6 Scenario 2: Coalition Government is Formed............................................ 10 Scenario 3: Fragmented Syria ....................................................................15 Opportunities and Risks for the United States........................................... 21 Appendix .................................................................................................. 22 References ................................................................................................ 26 Counterterrorism in Syria: Three Potential Scenarios for 2015 Capstone Project Spring Semester 2013 - George Bush School of Government and Public Service 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We assess that an environment most
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION and ADVICE ABOUT TRAVELLING to SYRIA the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Advises Against All Travel to Syria You Are at Risk If You Travel to Syria
    INFORMATION AND ADVICE ABOUT TRAVELLING TO SYRIA The Foreign and Commonwealth Office advises against all travel to Syria You are at risk if you travel to Syria. The whole of Syria is unsafe, and many ordinary Syrians say that foreigners are not welcome. We want to ensure that you are fully informed about the situation in Syria. The aim of this leaflet is to help you make safe decisions. Please share this advice with others. The Syrian regime has been undertaking an indiscriminate campaign of aerial bombardment since mid-December. A number of UK nationals have been killed or injured whilst in Syria, and there is a high risk of terrorism and kidnap. The availability of medical support is very limited throughout the country, and there are regular disruptions to phone, internet, electricity and road networks. Travellers risk being stranded without the necessary support and are unlikely to reach their intended destination. In addition, people face difficulties accessing cash. Contact with family and friends can become difficult or impossible. What are the risks from terrorism in Syria? There are many terrorist groups fighting in Syria. This includes groups linked to al-Qaeda. Terrorist groups attack opposition members as often as they attack the Assad regime. Terrorist groups target UK nationals, including for kidnap. Your family may face ransom demands to secure your freedom. The long standing policy of the British Government is not to make substantive concessions to hostage takers. The British Government considers that paying ransoms and releasing prisoners increases the risk of further hostage-taking. The situation on the ground is changing all the time as groups change their structure and allegiance.
    [Show full text]