DOCSLIB.ORG

Kupreanof Island Analysis for Your Review and Comment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kupreanof Island Analysis for Your Review and Comment United States Forest Alaska Region Tongass National Forest (*=) Department of Service Petersburg Ranger District @ Agriculture P.O. BOX 1328 Petersburg, AK 99833 File Code: 1950 Date: September 15, 2000 Dear Reviewer: Enclosed is a draft copy of the Kupreanof Island Analysis for your review and comment. This report provides a broad look at existing natural resource conditions and patterns of human use, and describes how the Forest Plan guides management of National Forest lands on Kupreanof Island. It also lists ongoing projects and recommends possible projects that could take place in the next 20 years. This is not a decision document. The projects listed have either been through, or will go through National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis before they can be implemented, which will allow public involvement. By looking at Kupreanof Island as a whole, we hope to see how activities and resources are linked together on the island. This analysis shows how projects can be designed to accomplish Forest Plan management objectives. Consideration of public comments has been essential to this analysis and provides the basis for developing project ideas and objectives. We reviewed over 40 environmental documents and other reports associated with Kupreanof Island from the past 25 years. We held public meetings in both Petersburg and Kake. Comments received on past projects, at public meetings, and during this analysis have been included in this document. This document has been a long time in preparation. We began the project in 1995. In 1997, a new Forest Plan was issued which changed the way we manage forest resources. Modifications were added to the Forest Plan in 1999. All current Forest Plan direction has been incorporated into this document. Thank you for your participation in this important project. We welcome your additional comments. We are requesting them by December 1, 2000. For more information or questions, please contact Bob Dalrymple (907) 772-3871. Sincerely BFATRICI A. ANTHAM District Ranger L@ a Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed m Recycled Paper%3 Kupreanof Island Analysis United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Alaska Region Tongass National Forest Petersburg Ranger District For information, contact: Bob Dalrymple Tongass National Forest P.O. BOX 1328 Petersburg, Alaska 99833 (907) 772-3871 Abstract: This document describes the national forest resources on Kupre- anof Island and lists Forest Plan direction for these resources. Projects and activities are suggested based on the Forest Plan and on public con- cerns and preferences. Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 About This Project ....................................................................................................... 1 Why We Decided to Do This Project ...........................................................................2 How We Did lt .............................................................................................................2 Chapter 1- Public Comments and Ideas ....................................................................7 Wildlife ........................................................................................................................7 Timber ........................................................................................................................8 Recreation, Tourism, and Scenery ............................................................................ 10 Subsistence and Traditional Values and Customs .................................................... 11 Aquatic Species and Watershed ...............................................................................ll Transportation ..............................................................0............................................ 12 Comments Beyond the Scope of the Kupreanof Island Analysis ............................... 13 Chapter 2- Landscape Patterns ................................................................................17 Human Use Patterns ................................................................................................. 17 Geology .................................................................................................................... 19 Vegetation ................................................................................................................20 Climate and Hydrology ..............................................................................................2l Wildlife ......................................................................................................................22 Fisheries ...................................................................................................................22 Chapter 3- Resource Information .............................................................................25 Forest Plan Direction ................................................................................................25 Laws Directing Resource Management on National Forests .....................................25 Land Use Designations on Kupreanof Island ............................................................26 Non-National Forest Lands on Kupreanof island .......................................................27 Fish, Soil, and Water Resources ...............................................................................28 Heritage Resources and Traditional Customs ...........................................................35 Recreation and Tourism ............................................................................................38 Scenery ....................................................................................................................47 Subsistence ..............................................................................................................53 Transportation ...........................................................................................................57 Vegetation and Timber ............................................................................... ...............65 Wildlife ......................................................................................................................8O Chapter 4- Projects and Design Objectives .............................. 89 Bibliography ...............................................................................................................99 List of Maps (see separate map packet) Map 1 Landscape Patterns Map 2 Land Use Designations (LUDS) Map 3 Fish, Soils, and Watersheds Map 4 Recreation Places Map 5 Road Systems Map 6 Land Suitable for Timber Harvest Map 7 North Kupreanof Area Projects Map 8 Southwest Kupreanof Area Projects Map 9 Duncan Canal Area Projects Kupreanof Island Analysis Introduction About This Project Welcome to the Kupreanof Island Analysis. and human use and activities on the island. This document is an island-wide planning Over time, conditions may change and the analysis. Two previous island-wide analyses Kupreanof Island Analysis will be updated. with which you may be familiar are the Mitkof This analysis also recommends possible fu- Landscape Design (1995) and the Wrangell ture projects. Implementation of future Island Analysis (1998). This level of planning projects would require National Environ- falls between the forest-wide level of the mental Policy Act (NEPA) analyses. You will Tongass Land and Resource Management have the opportunity to comment on projects Plan (Forest Plan) and site-specific project proposed in this document during site-specific planning. Mid-level planning takes a broader planning. view and sets the stage for detailed studies or close-in views. Figure1 As noted above, forest planning is composed of varying levels at differing scales. Imagine for a moment that the Forest Plan (forest- wide level) looks at Kupreanof Island from a satellite. The high-altitude view in Figure 1 reveals how Kupreanof Island fits into the broad scale of the entire Tongass National Forest. This particular Island Analysis takes a closer look at Kupreanof Island as from a floatplane at an altitude of 3,000 feet. From the float- plane, we see how human activities fit into the Kupreanof Island landscape area. (See Figure 2.) Site-specific project planning looks closer still - from ground level. Site-specific project planning looks at how each proposed project fits on the ground, with neighboring projects Tongass National Forest outlined in the island analysis design (see with Kupreanof Island Highlighted Figure 3). Each of these planning efforts is important for the overall management of Ku- preanof Island. The Kupreanof Island Analysis provides a look at existing natural resource conditions Kupreanof IslandAnalvsis Why We Decided to Do This Project We began an island-wide analysis for two reasons. First, we wanted to look at relation- ships between ecological processes and forest management across Kupreanof Island. When planning projects such as roads, timber harvest, recreation facilities, or fish and wild- life habitat improvements, we focus on small project areas in one- to three-year time frames. Past project implementation has resulted in the present natural and modified landscapes across Kupreanof Island. lsland- wide planning helps us anticipate the cumula- tive effects of various projects distributed over space and time on the island. For example,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tongass National Forest Roadless Rule Complaint
    Katharine S. Glover (Alaska Bar No. 0606033) Eric P. Jorgensen (Alaska Bar No. 8904010) EARTHJUSTICE 325 Fourth Street Juneau, AK 99801 907.586.2751; [email protected]; [email protected] Nathaniel S.W. Lawrence (Wash. Bar No. 30847) (pro hac vice pending) NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL 3723 Holiday Drive, SE Olympia, WA 98501 360.534.9900; [email protected] Garett R. Rose (D.C. Bar No. 1023909) (pro hac vice pending) NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL 1152 15th St. NW Washington DC 20005 202.289.6868; [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Organized Village of Kake, et al. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE; ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF ) SAXMAN; HOONAH INDIAN ASSOCIATION; KETCHIKAN ) INDIAN COMMUNITY; KLAWOCK COOPERATIVE ) ASSOCIATION; WOMEN’S EARTH AND CLIMATE ACTION ) Case No. 1:20-cv- NETWORK; THE BOAT COMPANY; UNCRUISE; ALASKA ) ________ LONGLINE FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATION; SOUTHEAST ) ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL; NATURAL RESOURCES ) DEFENSE COUNCIL; ALASKA RAINFOREST DEFENDERS; ) ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE; SIERRA CLUB; DEFENDERS ) OF WILDLIFE; NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY; CENTER FOR ) BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; FRIENDS OF THE EARTH; THE ) WILDERNESS SOCIETY; GREENPEACE, INC.; NATIONAL ) WILDLIFE FEDERATION; and ENVIRONMENT AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as Secretary of ) Agriculture, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) AGRICULTURE, STEPHEN CENSKY, or his successor, in his ) official capacity as Deputy Secretary of Agriculture; and UNITED ) STATES FOREST SERVICE, ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706; 16 U.S.C. § 551; 16 U.S.C. § 1608; 42 U.S.C. § 4332; 16 U.S.C. § 3120) INTRODUCTION 1. This action challenges a rule, 36 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission
    SALMON-TAGGING EXPERIMENTS IN ALASKA, 1924 AND 1925 1 .:I- By WILLIS H. RICH, Ph. D. Director, U. S. Biological Station, Seattle, Wash; .:I­ CONTENTS Page Introduction _ 109 Experiments in southeastern Alaska__hhu u __nn_h__u u u _ 116 Tagging record _ 116 Returns from experiments in Icy Strait__ n h_u u_..u u _ 119 Returns from experiments in Frederick Sound u huh _ 123 Returns from experiments in Chatham Strait; h u • _ 123 Returns from experiments in Sumner Strait, u_uuu .. u _ 128 Returns from experiments at Cape Muzon and Kaigani Point, ~ _ 135 Returns from experiments at Cape Chacon u n u h _ 137 Returns from experiments near Cape Fox and Duke Islandu _ 141 Variations in returns of tagged fish; h _u u n n h n __ h u_ 143 Conelusions _ 144 Experiments at Port Moller, 1925un__h_uu uu __ 145 INTRODUCTION The extensive salmon-tagging experiments conducted during 1922 and 1923 2 in the region of the Alaska Peninsula proved so productive of information, both of scientific interest and of practical application in the care of these fisheries, that it was considered desirable to undertake similar investigations in other districts; Accordingly, experiments were carried on in southeastern Alaska in 1924 and again in 1925. In 1925, also, at the request of one of the companies engaged in packing salmon in the Port Moller district, along the northern shore of the Alaska Penin­ sula, the work done there in 1922 was repeated. The results of these experiments form the basis for the following report.
    [Show full text]
  • No Name Bay and Other Misnomers in This Issue Richard Carstensen Kids Page
    News and Views from Discovery Southeast Fall 1999 No Name Bay and other misnomers In this issue Richard Carstensen Kids Page ....................................... 7 Meet the New Naturalists ............. 8 “A naturalist is somebody that knows a lot of names.” Kayaker from Cali- Thoughts on Nature Studies ........ 10 fornia, met on Halibut Island, mouth of Port Frederick, 1994. I became a naturalist at Juneau’s Eagle Beach in the 1980s. Although I didn’t think to wonder about it at the time, Eagle Beach and Eagle River To understand Eagle Beach I had to map derive their names not from any surfeit of eagles but from the Eagle Gla- it, and to situate the thousands of notes I took cier up valley. The glacier itself was named by naval commander Richard there, I needed place names. On my 1983 Meade in 1869 “because of this feature’s resemblance to an eagle with map of the scout camp area there are 25 or so outstretched wings.” 1 names, only one of which pre-dated my 12- Meade’s view of Eagle Glacier was almost certainly from saltwater. year residence there. Others I had to invent. Today there are few places in Favorite Channel from which its corrugated Shunning IWGNs (Important White Guy icefalls can be seen, and what we do see looks nothing like an eagle. Over Names), I tried to apply names that actually the last 130 years, the glacier surface has downwasted hundreds of feet. carried information about places. “Dowitcher Staring at my photos of the glacier from M/V Columbia, trying to restore Slough,” clogged with river mud, drew flocks the 1869 ice levels in my imagination, I catch teasing glimpses of Meade’s of the little syringe-billed probers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Kayaking on the Petersburg
    SeaSea KayakingKayaking onon thethe PetersburgPetersburg RangerRanger DistrictDistrict Routes Included in Handout Petersburg to Kake via north shore of Kupreanof Island Petersburg to Kake via south shore of Kupreanof Island LeConte Bay Loop Thomas Bay Loop Northwest Kuiu Island Loop Duncan Canal Loop Leave No Trace (LNT) information Tongass National Forest Petersburg Ranger District P.O. Box 1328 Petersburg AK. 99833 Sea Kayaking in the Petersburg Area The Petersburg area offers outstanding paddling opportunities. From an iceberg filled fjord in LeConte Bay to the Keku Islands this remote area has hundreds of miles of shoreline to explore. But Alaska is not a forgiving place, being remote, having cold water, large tides and rug- ged terrain means help is not just around the corner. One needs to be experienced in both paddling and wilderness camping. There are not established campsites and we are trying to keep them from forming. To help ensure these wild areas retain their naturalness it’s best to camp on the durable surfaces of the beach and not damage the fragile uplands vegetation. This booklet will begin to help you plan an enjoyable and safe pad- dling tour. The first part contains information on what paddlers should expect in this area and some safety guidelines. The second part will help in planning a tour. The principles of Leave No Trace Camping are presented. These are suggestions on how a person can enjoy an area without damaging it and leave it pristine for years to come. Listed are over 30 Leave No Trace campsites and several possible paddling routes in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Wildlife on the Coronation and Spani'sh Islands
    ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND G~lli JUNEAU, ALASKA STATE OF ALASKA Bill Sheffield, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH 1\ND GA1-1E Don Collinsworth, Commissioner DIVISION OF GAME Lewis Pamplin, Director OCCURRENCE OF WILDLIFE ON THE CORONATION AND SPANI'SH ISLANDS. ALASKA BY Charles R. Land E. L. Young, Jr. Petersburg Area Report No. 84-1 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section SUMMARY. 1 OBJECTIVES 2 BACKGROUND 3 C') STUDY AREA 3 ~ <0 C\1 0 PROCEDURES 7 C\1 ~ 0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 8 0 1.{) 1.{) RECOMMENDATIONS. 16 """'C') C') ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17 LITERATURE CITED 18 FIGURES. 19 TABLES 21 APPENDIX 26 SUMMARY During the period of February to August 1983, a project was initiated to determine the status of the wildlife populations of Coronation Island. Hunting and trapping seasons have been closed for many years and deer and furbearer populations were of primary concern. Our studies indicate that the deer population is high and opening the season is recommended. There appeared to be numerous mink and river otters, and again, opening the season is advised. Forty-eight species of birds were identified during the study. Fourteen species were identified as known or probable nesters. No evidence of wolves was found on the island, although there was a transplant in the 1960's. Terrestrial mammals observed included Sitka black-tailed deer, mink, river otter, Sitka deer mouse, Coronation Island vole, and vagrant shrew. Sea otters were commonly observed and harbor seals and Steller sea lions were numerous. Humpback whales were seen in Aats Bay and Egg Harbor as well as offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Alaska Mid-Region Access Port and Ferry Terminal Technical Memorandum
    S A M-R A P Ferr T T M Prepared for Fr Highw An Through R Pecci Associates, I. 825 Custer Avenue Helena, Montana 59604 (406)447-5000 www.rpa-hln.com Prepared by T Gos Associates, I. 1201 Western Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98101 www.glosten.com Pametri, I. 700 NE Multnomah, Suite 1000 Portland, OR 97232-4110 T. 503.233.2400 F, 503.233.4825 www.parametrix.com CITATION The Glosten Associates, Inc., Parametrix, Inc. 2011. Southeast Alaska Mid-Region Access Port and Ferry Terminal Technical Memorandum. Prepared by The Glosten Associates, Inc., Seattle, Washington, Parametrix, Inc., Portland, Oregon. April 2011. Port and Ferry Terminal Technical Memorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Mid-Region Access Study ......................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Southeast Alaska Mid-Region Access Study Corridors ..................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 Bradfield Canal Corridor ....................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2 Stikine River Corridor ........................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.3 Aaron Creek Corridor............................................................................................ 1-5 1.3 Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Kupreanof / Mitkof Province
    Kupreanof / Mitkof Province and northeastern Kupreanof. In the southwestern corner fringing Rocky Pass, extensive volcanic rocks underlie a rolling, boggy plateau. Other portions of the province have greater relief, but only in the northwest corner are there highly productive parent materials that once supported extensive large-tree forest. Mitkof Island has the northernmost redcedars on the archipelago. (A few occur to the north at Farragut Bay on the mainland.) Yellow-cedars are abundant throughout the province, yet a large proportion of cedar stands are currently experiencing a systematic die-off that is wide-spread throughout Southeast Alaska and northern British Columbia (Hennon et al. 1990, Hennon et al. 2005). Compared to island provinces such as East Chichagof and North Prince of Wales, where deeply dissecting fiords and more rugged relief create obstacles to wildlife connectivity, Kupreanof-Mitkof Province has a low degree of natural fragmentation. This province has a high number of mammal species; collectively, Kupreanof and Mitkof host 21 known mammal species, the second largest number (after Wrangell/Etolin) for any island province (MacDonald FIG 1. Kupreanof-Mitkof Province. and Cook 1999). This species richness certainly reflects proximity to the Stikine River which is a major The biogeographic province of Kupreanof and Mitkof corridor connecting wildlife from the interior with the Islands is located in central Southeast north of the coastal forests. Stikine River Delta (Fig 1). This province has one of Kake and Petersburg–the province’s two mid-sized the highest proportions (65%) of development lands of communities– are both dependent upon the any province in Southeast and only 5% of the lands are surrounding marine and terrestrial environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the Petersburg and Parts of the Port Alexander and Sumdum 1:250,000 Quadrangles, Southeastern Alaska
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary reconnaissance geologic map of the Petersburg and parts of the Port Alexander and Sumdum 1:250,000 quadrangles, southeastern Alaska By David A. Brew , A. Thomas Ovenshine , Susan M. Karl , and Susan J. Hunt* Open-File Report 84-405 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S Geological Survey editorial standards and strati graphic nomenclature. *Menlo Park, California ^Reston, Virginia ^Anchorage, Alaska Preliminary reconnaissance geologic map of the Petersburg and parts of the Port Alexander and Sumdum 1:250,000 quadrangles, southeastern Alaska By David A. Brew, A. T. Ovenshine, Susan M. Karl, and Susan J. Hunt INTRODUCTION This report consists of three main items: (1) the geologic map (sheet 1 of 2), (2) the correlation of map units (sheet 2 of 2), which includes an inset map relating different parts of the map to the correlation of map units and to (3) the description of map units (this pamphlet). The inset map on sheet 2 shows the major geological elements of the map area. They are, from west to east, (1) the Alexander belt, consisting of generally unmetamorphosed Lower Paleozoic through Upper Triassic rocks intruded by scattered mid-Cretaceous plutons, (2) the Gravina belt, consisting of unmetamorphosed to highly metamorphosed, variably deformed Upper Jurassic(?) through mid-Cretaceous flysch and volcanic rocks intruded by both mid- and Upper Cretaceous plutons, and (3) the Mainland belt, consisting of metamorphic rocks intruded by Upper Cretaceous, lower Tertiary, and mid- Tertiary plutons. Younger than almost all parts of all of these belts, and extending from the Alexander belt across the Gravina and onto the mainland belt, is the lower to middle Tertiary Kuiu-Etolin belt that consists largely of varied volcanic rocks, associated plutons, and minor sedimentary rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuiu Timber Sale Complaint
    Erin Whalen (Alaska Bar No. 1508067) (Admission pending) Thomas S. Waldo (Alaska Bar No. 9007047) EARTHJUSTICE 325 Fourth Street Juneau, AK 99801 T: 907.586.2751 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Southeast Alaska Conservation Council et al. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION ) COUNCIL; THE BOAT COMPANY; ALASKA ) RAINFOREST DEFENDERS; ALASKA ) WILDERNESS LEAGUE; CENTER FOR ) BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; DEFENDERS OF ) WILDLIFE; and NATURAL RESOURCES ) DEFENSE COUNCIL, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. ____________________ ) v. ) ) EARL STEWART, in his official capacity as Forest ) Supervisor for the Tongass National Forest; DAVID ) ZIMMERMAN, in his official capacity as District ) Ranger for the Petersburg Ranger District of the ) Tongass National Forest; UNITED STATES ) FOREST SERVICE; and UNITED STATES ) DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (5 U.S.C. §§ 702, 706(1), 706(2)(A); 42 U.S.C. § 4332) Case 1:18-cv-00005-HRH Document 1 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 14 INTRODUCTION 1. This action challenges the Kuiu Timber Sale in the Tongass National Forest. The U.S. Forest Service published the Kuiu Timber Sale Area Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in July 2007. The Forest Supervisor signed a Record of Decision (ROD) authorizing the sale of timber from Kuiu Island on May 13, 2008. In the eleven years since publication of the FEIS, there have been significant changes relevant to the timber sale, including: the sale’s dramatically increased public costs; a significant decline in employment opportunities due to export allowances; the growth of an ecotourism industry that relies on the project area for peaceful, remote scenery; and recent reports and studies indicating perilous declines in wildlife populations on Kuiu Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska's Marine Highway Corridor Management Plan
    ALASKAíS MARINE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP PLAN Celebrating the 40th Anniversary of the Nation’s Most Scenic Byway. Prepared for The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, as part of the submission materials required for the designation under the National Scenic Byways Program of the Federal Highway Administration Prepared by Jensen Yorba Lott, Inc. February 2002 With Whiteman and Taintor Christianson Communications, Inc. Assistance from Walsh Services Southeast Strategies The McDowell Group Gateway Technologies Alaskaís Marine Highway Corridor Partnership Plan January 22, 2002 Dear Reader, It is with great pleasure I endorse the proposal to Southcentral Alaska, as well as along the far-flung chain connections will be improved, allowing designate Alaska’s Marine Highway as a National of Aleutian Islands. It is a story about people who have recreational enthusiasts to go directly from ships Scenic Byway. One travel writer summed up the thrived for generations upon the richest landscape— to footpaths, to port communities, to hiking great power of Alaska’s Marine Highway this way: Native Alaskans, Russian settlers, Scandinavian trails, to other scenic byways, and beyond. “one of the world’s most scenic highways requires no fishermen, soldiers, miners, and timber harvesters. It is driving, no road maps, no expensive stops at the gas a story about marine and upland wildlife—humpback In 2003, Alaska’s Marine Highway turns 40 years station, and no automobile.” and killer whales, seals and sea lions, sea otters, salmon old. In honor of this milestone, the State of and a myriad of exotic fish, teeming colonies of Alaska is nominating the Marine Highway for As a water-based highway, Alaska’s Marine Highway seabirds, bears, deer, moose and wolves.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarence Leroy Andrews Books and Papers in the Sheldon Jackson Archives and Manuscript Collection
    Clarence Leroy Andrews Books and Papers in the Sheldon Jackson Archives and Manuscript Collection ERRATA: based on an inventory of the collection August-November, 2013 Page 2. Insert ANDR I RUSS I JX238 I F82S. Add note: "The full record for this item is on page 108." Page6. ANDR I RUSS I V46 /V.3 - ANDR-11. Add note: "This is a small booklet inserted inside the front cover of ANDR-10. No separate barcode." Page 31. ANDR IF I 89S I GS. Add note: "The spine label on this item is ANDR IF I 89S I 84 (not GS)." Page S7. ANDR IF I 912 I Y9 I 88. Add note: "The spine label on this item is ANDR IF/ 931 I 88." Page 61. Insert ANDR IF I 931 I 88. Add note: "See ANDR IF I 912 I Y9 I 88. Page 77. ANDR I GI 6SO I 182S I 84. Change the date in the catalog record to 1831. It is not 1931. Page 100. ANDR I HJ I 664S I A2. Add note to v.1: "A" number in book is A-2S2, not A-717. Page 103. ANDR I JK / 86S. Add note to 194S pt. 2: "A" number in book is A-338, not A-348. Page 10S. ANDR I JK I 9S03 I A3 I 19SO. Add note: "A" number in book is A-1299, not A-1229. (A-1229 is ANDR I PS/ S71 / A4 I L4.) Page 108. ANDR I RUSS I JX I 238 / F82S. Add note: "This is a RUSS collection item and belongs on page 2." Page 1SS.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Resources Library & Information Services Anr
    Nl? 1- li4S~ FIELD INVESTIGATIONS OF THE HERPETOLOGICAL TAXA IN SOUTHEAST ALASKA , Bradford R. Norman1 and Thomas J. Hassler National Biological Service California Cooperative Fishery Research Unit Humboldt State University Arcata, California 95521 FINAL REPORT 29-95 ARLIS Alaska Resources Library & Information Services Anr.honu1f' Al~~k::l 1Present address: 3390 William Street, Eureka, California 95503 2 ABSTRACT Herpetological investigations were conducted at 285 transects from 28 March through 31 September 1992 in southeast Alaska. Key museum collections were examined and a complete review of the state of Alaskan herpetological literature was undertaken. The 1992 vouchers were inventoried and analyzed from 1993 through 1995. Several thousand individual specimen observations of six amphibian species were tabulated. The six herpetological species encountered in 1992 were: rough-skinned newt (Tariaha granulosa), western toad (Bufo boreas), long-toed salamander (Ambystoma maarodaatylum), spotted frog (Rana pretiosa), wood frog (R. sylvatiaa), and Pacific chorus frog (Pseudacris regilla). In many cases combinations of these species were found to breed sympatrically (i.e., at the same location and concurrently over the period of observations). Special attempts to trap and/or observe various additional herpetological taxa were made but with negative results. The herpetological species which were specifically searched for but which were not encountered were: the Alaskan slender salamander (Batraahoseps caudatus), northwestern salamander (Ambystoma gracile), Pacific giant salamanders (genus Diaamptodon), tailed frog (Asaaphus truei), Siberian salamanders (genus Hynobius), garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.), and sea turtles (Families: Cheloniidae and Dermochelyidae). The presence of garter snakes in the state of Alaska could not be verified during this study though considerable effort was put forth to this end.
    [Show full text]