DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecology and Habitat of a Threatened Nocturnal Bird, the Tasmanian Masked Owl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecology and Habitat of a Threatened Nocturnal Bird, the Tasmanian Masked Owl Ecology and habitat of a threatened nocturnal bird, the Tasmanian Masked Owl By Michael Kenneth Todd B.Sc.(Hons), University of Newcastle Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania Hobart, Tasmania, Australia August 2012 1 Ecology of the Tasmanian Masked Owl Declarations This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma in any university or other institution. This thesis, to the best of my knowledge, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text. This thesis may be available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act of 1968. The research associated with this thesis abides by the international and Australian codes on human and animal experimentation, the guidelines by the Australian Government's Office of the Gene Technology Regulator and the rulings of the Safety, Ethics and Institutional Biosafety Committees of the University. All research conducted was under valid animal ethics approvals. Relevant permits were obtained from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment and the University of Tasmania Animal Ethics Committee (A0009763 and A0009685). Michael Kenneth Todd 2 Ecology of the Tasmanian Masked Owl Dedication: This thesis is dedicated to the marvelously mysterious Tasmanian Masked Owl. May they continue to haunt Tasmania’s forests. “Once the sun disappears, along with the light, She stretches her wings and sets off in flight, And hunts far and wide well into the night, Small native mammals her especial delight; She’s endangered!” From “The Masked Owl” -Philip R. Rush, Australian Poems That Would Enchant an Echidna (2007) 3 Ecology of the Tasmanian Masked Owl Acknowledgements This research was conducted under permits from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme and the University of Tasmania Animal Ethics Committee. It was funded in part by the Co-operative Research Centre for Forestry, Winifred Violet Scott Charitable Trust, Australian Geographic Society, Threatened Species Section- Biodiversity Conservation Branch- Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment, Australian Bird Study Association, the Stuart Leslie Award (BirdLife Australia- formerly known as Birds Australia) and the Forest Practices Authority. Many people assisted with the project in a myriad of different ways. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisors Sarah Munks, Alastair Richardson, Mark Hindell, Rod Kavanagh, Phil Bell, David Bowman and Iain Taylor. People who provided particular logistical support included Daniel Livingston, Shaun Thurstans, Trent Penman, Jason Wiersma, Chris Spencer, David Young, David Ratkowsky, Nick Mooney, David Ratkowsky, Nick Gust, Peter Davies, Rod Knight, Jo Lee, Phil Rush, Steve Stanton, Barry Rumbold, Wayne Kelly, Felicity Wilkinson and Richard Holmes. I would also like to thank those that volunteered their time on the off chance that they might get to see an owl including in particular, Angela Gillone, Sue Drake, Peter Tonelli, Simon Plowright, Chris Coleborn, Bronwyn Luck, Sarah Tassell, Mike Bysouth, John and Shirley Tongue, and Ron and Jill Harris among others. The following people assisted me in making the project work in many different ways; Amy Koch, Murray Lord, Craig Webb, Alan McBride, Peter Shute, Jeff Davies, Tim Bawden, Ed McNabb, David Milledge, Carl Clifford, Adelaide Marshall, Laurie Conole, Stewart Nicol, Virginia Andrews-Goff, Rohan Bilney, Priscilla Park, Linley Grant, Mel Hills, Ninna Millikin, Arthur Clarke, Vanessa Thompson, Martin Stone, Mark Wapstra, Andrew Bonnitcha, Heather Chauncy, Bill 4 Ecology of the Tasmanian Masked Owl Brown, Mark Holdsworth, Matthew Webb, Genevieve Gates, Erin Flynn, Lisa Cawthen, Shannon Troy, Niall Doran, Mike Driessen, Kate Hamilton, Kit Williams, Barrie Wells, Julia and Frank at Seaview Farm, David and Robyn at Millybrook, Mike at Paradise Cottage, Carolyn at Crayfish Creek Caravan Park, Colin and Marje at Taraki Cottages, Mary Kille, Anne Watson, Barry Gallagher, Rodrigo Hamede, Kevin Redd, Tim Reid, Shelly Lachish, Belinda Yaxley, Heidi Auman and Helen Stephens. I thank my family in New South Wales as well as in Tasmania for supporting and encouraging me. In particular, Bev for hours of babysitting, Bron for supporting me through thick and thin and Henry and Lucy for giving me the inspiration I needed to persevere. Finally, I have to acknowledge my father Ernest for teaching me the importance of persistence (or was that stubbornness), and instilled in me the value of having an enquiring mind. 5 Ecology of the Tasmanian Masked Owl 6 Ecology of the Tasmanian Masked Owl Abstract Rare species are often those most in need of conservation measures and yet they are often the least well known and most difficult subjects for scientific research. The methods frequently applied when researching species ecology are often not feasible with rare species. This study investigates the ways in which habitat influences the ecology and distribution of a rare, threatened nocturnal bird, the Tasmanian Masked Owl (Tyto novaehollandiae castanops) using mostly indirect methods. The results provide insight into the value of indirect methods in determining habitat surrogates that may be used in conservation planning for rare and threatened species. Diet of owls in different habitats was determined using analysis of regurgitated pellets and a synthesis of previously published data. It was found that while the owl has a wide range of potential prey species, owls focus on particular prey species in different areas. Introduced species, particularly rodents, made up a large proportion of the diet at most sites. Sites that had little native forest contained low percentages of native species in the diet. Calling behaviour was explored using recordings of owls obtained during call playback surveys and via automatic recording devices set at roost sites. The screech call of the Tasmanian Masked Owl was found to be deeper and to reach higher frequencies than the Australian Masked Owl (T. n. novaehollandiae). Calls were shown to have the potential to discriminate between age, sex and potentially individuals. The occurrence of the owl throughout its potential range in forested areas of Tasmania was investigated using call playback surveys. Occupancy probability modeling (presence-absence data) was used to calculate the detectability of the Tasmanian Masked Owl in call playback surveys and to define habitat and 7 Ecology of the Tasmanian Masked Owl landscape features that best predict owl presence. Wind (negative) and air temperature (positive) were found to have the most influence on Tasmanian Masked Owl detectability, while low elevation, mature dry eucalypt forest was determined to be the best predictor of occupancy. The best occupancy probability model was used to create habitat quality map. The habitat quality map was compared with maps created using presence only records and maximum entropy models. There was broad similarity in the maps although the habitat quality map was more detailed. The occupancy probability methods will be of value for the study of habitat preferences of a wide range of cryptic, and/ or rare species. The survey methodology used would vary depending on the species of interest, but the statistical framework behind the models would remain applicable. The call analysis methods and the diet analysis methods are applicable to studies of other owl species. By combining the results obtained using the indirect techniques with knowledge of owl ecology from the literature, possible causes of the estimated small population size for the Tasmanian Masked Owl were explored. A range of habitat factors can affect the Tasmanian Masked Owl, including nesting and roosting habitat, elevation and mature dry eucalypt forest. Prey availability (abundance and accessibility) is likely to be the ultimate factor responsible for the distribution and abundance of Tasmanian Masked Owls and it probably is reflected in the distribution of low elevation, mature dry eucalypt forest in Tasmania. 8 Ecology of the Tasmanian Masked Owl Table of Contents Declarations .......................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 21 Ecology of rare species ....................................................................................................... 21 Owls of the world ............................................................................................................... 22 Owl ecology ......................................................................................................................... 23 Research techniques in owl ecology .................................................................................. 26 Australian Masked Owl (Tyto novaehollandiae) ............................................................ 29 Tasmanian Masked Owl (Tyto novaehollandiae castanops) .......................................... 31 Thesis aim and objectives
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spatial Ecology of the Tasmanian Spotted-Tailed Quoll
    Spatial Ecology of the Tasmanian Spotted-Tailed Quoll Shannon Nichole Troy Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science, Flinders University of South Australia Honours, Biological Science, Monash University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences University of Tasmania November 2014 Preface Author Declarations Declaration of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. November 2014 Shannon Troy Date Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. November 2014 Shannon Troy Date i Preface Author Declarations Statement of Ethical Conduct The research associated with this thesis abides by the international and Australian codes on human and animal experimentation, the guidelines by the Australian Government's Office of the Gene Technology Regulator and the rulings of the Safety, Ethics and Institutional Biosafety Committees of the University. November 2014 Shannon Troy Date ii Preface Acknowledgements Acknowledgements I am very fortunate to have been supervised by a group of outstanding ecologists and wonderful people. Thanks to my primary supervisor, Menna Jones, for the opportunity to undertake a PhD, allowing me to take it in my own direction, providing enthusiasm and support for my ideas, and lots of interesting discussions about predator ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Diurnal Raptors and Airports
    Australian diurnal raptors and airports Photo: John Barkla, BirdLife Australia William Steele Australasian Raptor Association BirdLife Australia Australian Aviation Wildlife Hazard Group Forum Brisbane, 25 July 2013 So what is a raptor? Small to very large birds of prey. Diurnal, predatory or scavenging birds. Sharp, hooked bills and large powerful feet with talons. Order Falconiformes: 27 species on Australian list. Family Falconidae – falcons/ kestrels Family Accipitridae – eagles, hawks, kites, osprey Falcons and kestrels Brown Falcon Black Falcon Grey Falcon Nankeen Kestrel Australian Hobby Peregrine Falcon Falcons and Kestrels – conservation status Common Name EPBC Qld WA SA FFG Vic NSW Tas NT Nankeen Kestrel Brown Falcon Australian Hobby Grey Falcon NT RA Listed CR VUL VUL Black Falcon EN Peregrine Falcon RA Hawks and eagles ‐ Osprey Osprey Hawks and eagles – Endemic hawks Red Goshawk female Hawks and eagles – Sparrowhawks/ goshawks Brown Goshawk Photo: Rik Brown Hawks and eagles – Elanus kites Black‐shouldered Kite Letter‐winged Kite ~ 300 g Hover hunters Rodent specialists LWK can be crepuscular Hawks and eagles ‐ eagles Photo: Herald Sun. Hawks and eagles ‐ eagles Large ‐ • Wedge‐tailed Eagle (~ 4 kg) • Little Eagle (< 1 kg) • White‐bellied Sea‐Eagle (< 4 kg) • Gurney’s Eagle Scavengers of carrion, in addition to hunters Fortunately, mostly solitary although some multiple strikes on aircraft Hawks and eagles –large kites Black Kite Whistling Kite Brahminy Kite Frequently scavenge Large at ~ 600 to 800 g BK and WK flock and so high risk to aircraft Photo: Jill Holdsworth Identification Beruldsen, G (1995) Raptor Identification. Privately published by author, Kenmore Hills, Queensland, pp. 18‐19, 26‐27, 36‐37.
    [Show full text]
  • MORNINGTON PENINSULA BIODIVERSITY: SURVEY and RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Design and Editing: Linda Bester, Universal Ecology Services
    MORNINGTON PENINSULA BIODIVERSITY: SURVEY AND RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Design and editing: Linda Bester, Universal Ecology Services. General review: Sarah Caulton. Project manager: Garrique Pergl, Mornington Peninsula Shire. Photographs: Matthew Dell, Linda Bester, Malcolm Legg, Arthur Rylah Institute (ARI), Mornington Peninsula Shire, Russell Mawson, Bruce Fuhrer, Save Tootgarook Swamp, and Celine Yap. Maps: Mornington Peninsula Shire, Arthur Rylah Institute (ARI), and Practical Ecology. Further acknowledgements: This report was produced with the assistance and input of a number of ecological consultants, state agencies and Mornington Peninsula Shire community groups. The Shire is grateful to the many people that participated in the consultations and surveys informing this report. Acknowledgement of Country: The Mornington Peninsula Shire acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as the first Australians and recognises that they have a unique relationship with the land and water. The Shire also recognises the Mornington Peninsula is home to the Boonwurrung / Bunurong, members of the Kulin Nation, who have lived here for thousands of years and who have traditional connections and responsibilities to the land on which Council meets. Data sources - This booklet summarises the results of various biodiversity reports conducted for the Mornington Peninsula Shire: • Costen, A. and South, M. (2014) Tootgarook Wetland Ecological Character Description. Mornington Peninsula Shire. • Cook, D. (2013) Flora Survey and Weed Mapping at Tootgarook Swamp Bushland Reserve. Mornington Peninsula Shire. • Dell, M.D. and Bester L.R. (2006) Management and status of Leafy Greenhood (Pterostylis cucullata) populations within Mornington Peninsula Shire. Universal Ecology Services, Victoria. • Legg, M. (2014) Vertebrate fauna assessments of seven Mornington Peninsula Shire reserves located within Tootgarook Wetland.
    [Show full text]
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Great Sandy Region Chapter 5 Animals of the Dunes the Animals of Fraser Island and Cooloola Are Not Readily Apparent to the Casual Observer
    DGSR Fauna 1 Discovering Great Sandy Region Chapter 5 Animals of the Dunes The animals of Fraser Island and Cooloola are not readily apparent to the casual observer. The most obvious are birds and dingoes. Despite the obscurity of the fauna it presents an impressive range to those with the patience to explore and discover. This is because much of the fauna is lies buried in the sand or hidden by the great bulk of biomass or else it is either well camouflaged, very timid, or very small. However, it is not necessary to see animals in the wild to be attracted by them. Tens of thousands of anglers are used to searching out invisible targets as they seek the pelagic tailor during the winter months, and bream, whiting trevally and flathead at any time of the year. However, there are many other interesting animals in the sea around Fraser Island and Cooloola than those which delight the anglers. These mammals and reptiles are not the targets of anglers but the subject of much interest of those who are seeking to understand the environment and the many niches in and around Fraser Island and Cooloola. Although Fraser Island and Cooloola lack large populations of bigger terrestrial animals, they boast many rare and unusual species. One study in Cooloola alone identified over 300 species of ants, many new to science. In the aquatic environment the acidity of some of the peaty swamps has been so hostile that a specialized group of frogs known as "acid frogs" has evolved to fill this unique niche.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites
    Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites (Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, Upper Marikina-Kaliwa Forest Reserve, Bago River Watershed and Forest Reserve, Naujan Lake National Park and Subwatersheds, Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park and Mt. Apo Natural Park) Philippines Biodiversity & Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy & Ecosystem Resilience (B+WISER) 23 March 2015 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The Biodiversity and Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy and Ecosystem Resilience Program is funded by the USAID, Contract No. AID-492-C-13-00002 and implemented by Chemonics International in association with: Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Haribon Foundation World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites Philippines Biodiversity and Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy and Ecosystem Resilience (B+WISER) Program Implemented with: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Other National Government Agencies Local Government Units and Agencies Supported by: United States Agency for International Development Contract No.: AID-492-C-13-00002 Managed by: Chemonics International Inc. in partnership with Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Haribon Foundation World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) 23 March
    [Show full text]
  • Spotted Tailed Quoll (Dasyurus Maculatus)
    Husbandry Guidelines for the SPOTTED-TAILED QUOLL (Tiger Quoll) (Photo: J. Marten) Dasyurus maculatus (MAMMALIA: DASYURIDAE) Author: Julie Marten Date of Preparation: February 2013 – June 2014 Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Course Name and Number: Captive Animals Certificate III (18913) Lecturers: Graeme Phipps, Jacki Salkeld, Brad Walker DISCLAIMER Please note that this information is just a guide. It is not a definitive set of rules on how the care of Spotted- Tailed Quolls must be conducted. Information provided may vary for: • Individual Spotted-Tailed Quolls • Spotted-Tailed Quolls from different regions of Australia • Spotted-Tailed Quolls kept in zoos versus Spotted-Tailed Quolls from the wild • Spotted-Tailed Quolls kept in different zoos Additionally different zoos have their own set of rules and guidelines on how to provide husbandry for their Spotted-Tailed Quolls. Even though I researched from many sources and consulted various people, there are zoos and individual keepers, researchers etc. that have more knowledge than myself and additional research should always be conducted before partaking any new activity. Legislations are regularly changing and therefore it is recommended to research policies set out by national and state government and associations such as ARAZPA, ZAA etc. Any incident resulting from the misuse of this document will not be recognised as the responsibility of the author. Please use at the participants discretion. Any enhancements to this document to increase animal care standards and husbandry techniques are appreciated. Otherwise I hope this manual provides some helpful information. Julie Marten Picture J.Marten 2 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS It is important before conducting any work that all hazards are identified.
    [Show full text]
  • National Multi-Species Recovery Plan for the Partridge Pigeon [Eastern
    National Multi-species Recovery Plan for the Partridge Pigeon [eastern subspecies] Geophaps smithii smithii; Crested Shrike-tit [northern (sub)species] Falcunculus (frontatus) whitei; Masked Owl [north Australian mainland subspecies] Tyto novaehollandiae kimberli; and Masked Owl [Tiwi Islands subspecies] Tyto novaehollandiae melvillensis, 2004 - 2008 Copyright Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying or other, without prior permission of the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this document are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Citation Woinarski, J.C.Z. (2004). National Multi-species Recovery plan for the Partridge Pigeon [eastern subspecies] Geophaps smithii smithii, Crested Shrike-tit [northern (sub)species] Falcunculus (frontatus) whitei, Masked Owl [north Australian mainland subspecies] Tyto novaehollandiae kimberli; and Masked Owl [Tiwi Islands subspecies] Tyto novaehollandiae melvillensis, 2004 - 2009. Northern Territory Department of Infrastructure Planning and Environment, Darwin. A Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Pacific Islands: Samoa, Fiji, Vanuatu & New Caledonia Trip Report 11Th to 31St July 2015
    Southwest Pacific Islands: Samoa, Fiji, Vanuatu & New Caledonia Trip Report 11th to 31st July 2015 Orange Fruit Dove by K. David Bishop Trip Report - RBT Southwest Pacific Islands 2015 2 Tour Leaders: K. David Bishop and David Hoddinott Trip Report compiled by Tour Leader: K. David Bishop Tour Summary Rockjumper’s inaugural tour of the islands of the Southwest Pacific kicked off in style with dinner at the Stamford Airport Hotel in Sydney, Australia. The following morning we were soon winging our way north and eastwards to the ancient Gondwanaland of New Caledonia. Upon arrival we then drove south along a road more reminiscent of Europe, passing through lush farmlands seemingly devoid of indigenous birds. Happily this was soon rectified; after settling into our Noumea hotel and a delicious luncheon, we set off to explore a small nature reserve established around an important patch of scrub and mangroves. Here we quickly cottoned on to our first endemic, the rather underwhelming Grey-eared Honeyeater, together with Nankeen Night Herons, a migrant Sacred Kingfisher, White-bellied Woodswallow, Fantailed Gerygone and the resident form of Rufous Whistler. As we were to discover throughout this tour, in areas of less than pristine habitat we encountered several Grey-eared Honeyeater by David Hoddinott introduced species including Common Waxbill. And so began a series of early starts which were to typify this tour, though today everyone was up with added alacrity as we were heading to the globally important Rivierre Bleu Reserve and the haunt of the incomparable Kagu. We drove 1.3 hours to the reserve, passing through a stark landscape before arriving at the appointed time to meet my friend Jean-Marc, the reserve’s ornithologist and senior ranger.
    [Show full text]
  • Visayan Hornbill
    Visayan hornbill The Visayan hornbill (Penelopides panini) is a hornbill found in rainforests on the islands of Panay, Negros, Masbate, and Visayan hornbill Guimaras, and formerly Ticao, in the Philippines. It formerly included all other Philippine tarictic hornbills as subspecies, in which case the common name of the 'combined species' was shortened to tarictic hornbill. Contents Taxonomy Description Diet and behavior Pair at Avifauna in Alphen aan den Conservation Rijn, Netherlands. Captivity Conservation status References External links Endangered (IUCN 3.1)[1] Taxonomy Scientific classification The Visayan hornbill was described by the French polymath Kingdom: Animalia Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon in 1780 in his Histoire Phylum: Chordata Naturelle des Oiseaux.[2] The bird was also illustrated in a hand- coloured plate engraved by François-Nicolas Martinet in the Class: Aves Planches Enluminées D'Histoire Naturelle which was produced under the supervision of Edme-Louis Daubenton to accompany Order: Bucerotiformes Buffon's text.[3] Neither the plate caption nor Buffon's description Family: Bucerotidae included a scientific name but in 1783 the Dutch naturalist Pieter Boddaert coined the binomial name Buceros panini in his catalogue Genus: Penelopides of the Planches Enluminées.[4] The type locality is the island of Species: P. panini Panay in the Philippines.[5] The Visayan hornbill is now placed in Binomial name the genus Penelopides that was introduced in 1849 by the German naturalist Ludwig Reichenbach in a plate of the hornbills.[6][7] The Penelopides panini origin of the generic name is uncertain but it may be a combination (Boddaert, 1783) of the Latin pene meaning "almost" or "nearly", the Ancient Greek lophos meaning "crest" and -oideēs "resembling".
    [Show full text]
  • Tyto Longimembris) in Southern Taiwan
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251774474 Initial Investigation on the Diet of Eastern Grass Owl (Tyto longimembris) in Southern Taiwan ARTICLE in TAIWANIA · JANUARY 2007 CITATIONS READS 2 79 3 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Hui-Yun Tseng 8 PUBLICATIONS 6 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Hui-Yun Tseng Retrieved on: 14 January 2016 Taiwania, 52(1): 100-105, 2007 Initial Investigation on the Diet of Eastern Grass Owl (Tyto longimembris) in Southern Taiwan Wen-Loung Lin(1), Yin Wang(1) and Hui-Yun Tseng(2,3) (Manuscript received 4 October, 2006; accepted 26 December, 2006) ABSTRACT: This investigation, undertaken in the two regions of Nanshi and Yujing in Tainan County over the period of 2001 to 2003, included three nests belonging to the Eastern Grass Owl (Tyto longimembris). From these, we collected a total of 157 owl pellets. Analysis and examination of the pellets revealed 329 prey items. More in-depth investigation determined that 95.1% of the Eastern Grass Owl pellets collected consisted of mammal remains, while the remaining 4.9% were made up of bird remains. Of the various types of mammals consumed, rats made up the highest proportion, with a total of 285 rats, accounting for 86.6%. This was followed by 27 shrews and moles, accounting for 8.2%. Hares and birds were seldom caught and consumed. The findings suggested that rats are the main food source of the Eastern Grass Owl, with the Spinus Country-rat (Rattus losea) comprising the majority with 136 counted (41.3%), followed by the Formosan Mouse (Mus caroli) with 96 counted (29.2%).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Four Owl Species with Particular
    CHAPTER 1: THE ECOLOGY OF FOUR OWL SPECIES WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE GRASS OWL (TYTO CAPENSIS SMITH, 1834) BIOLOGY, HABITAT AND PREY SPECIFICATIONS IN THE EAST RAND HIGHVELD, GAUTENG “Habitats change with time, so that organisms must continually change also in order to adapt” (Maclean, 1990). 1 CHAPTER 1.1: GENERAL BACKGROUND 1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND A diversity of owls occurs in southern Africa, however this is only 12 of the world’s 135 species. Of these twelve owl species that occur within the sub- continent (Steyn, 1994), four are known to occur in the study area namely the rare African Grass Owl (Tyto capensis), Marsh Owl (Asio capensis), Barn Owl (Tyto alba) and the Spotted Eagle Owl (Bubo africanus) of which the Grass Owl is listed as vulnerable in the Red Data Book. The Barn and Grass owls belong to a genus known as Tyto, the Cape and Spotted Eagle Owls to Bubo, and the Marsh Owls to Asio, which only has one representative in southern Africa (Steyn, 1992). Owls are nocturnal birds of prey that are taxonomically unrelated to the diurnal raptors despite similarities in their predatory habits and weaponry (Steyn, 1984). Owls are separated into two fairly distinct families. The first family is Tytonidae, with typical representatives being T. alba and T. capensis, representing owls of distinct characteristic traits. The most obvious external differences are the general appearance, such as the heart, rather than round shape of the facial disc; the longer skeletal structure and beak; longer legs; longer, more pointed wings and a forked tail.
    [Show full text]