Effect of Ethanol–Gasoline Blend on Nox Emission in SI Engine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effect of Ethanol–Gasoline Blend on Nox Emission in SI Engine Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 24 (2013) 209–222 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser Effect of ethanol–gasoline blend on NOx emission in SI engine B.M. Masum n, H.H. Masjuki, M.A. Kalam, I.M. Rizwanul Fattah, S.M. Palash, M.J. Abedin Centre for Energy Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia article info abstract Article history: The stricter worldwide emission legislation and growing demands for lower fuel consumption and Received 25 July 2012 anthropogenic CO2 emission require significant efforts to improve combustion efficiency while satisfying Received in revised form the emission quality demands. Ethanol fuel combined with gasoline provides a particularly promising 10 March 2013 and, at the same time, a challenging approach. Ethanol is widely used as an alternative fuel or an effective Accepted 15 March 2013 additive of gasoline due to the advantage of its high octane number and its self-sustaining concept, Available online 16 April 2013 which can be supplied regardless of the fossil fuel. As a result, vast study has been carried out to study its Keywords: effects on engine performance and emission. Ethanol The first part of this article discusses prospect of fuel ethanol as a gasoline substitute. Then it Nitrogen oxide discusses comparative physicochemical properties of ethanol and gasoline. The slight differences in SI engine properties between ethanol and gasoline fuels are enough to create considerable change to combustion Renewable energy Emission system as well as behaviors of SI engines. These effects lead to several complex and interacting mechanisms, which make it difficult to identify the fundamentals of how ethanol affects NOx emission. After that, general NOx forming mechanisms are discussed to create a fundamental basis for further discussion. Finally, the article discusses different fuel composition, engine parameter and engine modification effects on NOx formation as well as mathematical approach for NOx prediction using ethanol. & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction........................................................................................................ 210 2. Ethanol fuel as a gasoline substitute . 210 3. Comparison of physicochemical properties . 212 4. Formation of NOx . 212 4.1. ThermalNOx................................................................................................. 213 4.2. PromptNOx.................................................................................................. 213 4.3. Intermediate N2O.............................................................................................. 213 4.4. FuelNOx.................................................................................................... 213 5. Effect of ethanol–gasoline blend on NOx emission . 213 5.1. Effect of fuel composition . 213 5.1.1. Effect of blend concentration . 213 5.1.2. Effect of hydrous ethanol . 215 5.2. Effect of engine parameters . 215 5.2.1. Effect of compression ratio . 215 5.2.2. Effect of engine load . 216 5.2.3. Effect of equivalence ratio . 216 5.2.4. Effect of speed . 216 5.2.5. Effect of cold-start . 216 n Correspondance to: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel.: þ603 79674448; fax: þ603 79675317. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (B.M. Masum). 1364-0321/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.046 210 B.M. Masum et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 24 (2013) 209–222 5.3. Engine modification............................................................................................ 217 5.3.1. Application of thermal barrier coating . 217 5.3.2. Effect of separate aqueous ethanol injection . 218 5.4. Effect of different vehicles. 218 6. Prediction of NOx emission by Artificial Neural Networks . 219 7. Conclusion......................................................................................................... 219 Acknowledgment . 220 References.............................................................................................................220 1. Introduction of NOx emissions related to use of ethanol in gasoline engine. There are many published studies on ethanol use as an alternative fuel in SI The consumption of energy has ever-increasing trend mainly due engines, as will be summarized next, to explain the potential change to two reasons: (1) changes in lifestyles and (2) the significant in NOx emissions with ethanol fuels. However, there are considerable growth of the population. Petroleum-based fossil fuels presently inconsistencies in the explanations, which make fundamental under- provide the major portion of the energy supply; however, their standing incomplete. sourcesarelimitedonthisEarth.Inthetwentiethcentury,the research emphasis was on the development of fossil crude oil, coal, and natural gas based refinery to exploit the cheaply available fossil 2. Ethanol fuel as a gasoline substitute feedstock to meet the growing demand of the population [1].Inthe 21st century, the adverse effect of greenhouse gas emissions on the Ethanol (C2H5OH) is an ecological fuel, as it is obtained from environment, together with declining petroleum reserves and future renewable energy sources. It is a colorless, transparent, neutral, energy security, is pronounced well. The combustion of fossil fuels is volatile, flammable, oxygenated liquid hydrocarbon, which has a a big contributor to carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, which is a direct pungent odor and a sharp burning taste [4]. At present, however, contributor to global warming. Every year about 25 billion ton of blends of bioethanol and gasoline are more common in vehicles CO2 are generated worldwide by anthropogenic activities [2].There- with fuel injection engines. Bioethanol and ethanol is practically fore, the present research is focused on alternative energy sources the same product. They have the same molecular and structural for sustainable development of the economy and society [1]. Fossil formula, and are the same substance. In other words, bioethanol is fuels still represent 80% of total energy supply whereas biofuel just plain ethanol, which is produced from sugar derived from contribute only 1% [3]. plants. Usually, it is produced from various feed stocks such as The main alternative fuels utilized so far are oxygenates sugar cane, sugar beet, sorghum, grain, switch grass, barley, hemp, (alcohol, ether etc.), vegetable oils and their esters, gaseous fuel kenaf, potatoes, sweet potatoes, cassava, sunflower, fruit, molasses, (hydrogen, liquefied petroleum gas etc.), gas to liquids (GTL) and corn, stover, grain, wheat, straw, cotton, and other biomass, as well coal derivatives. Ethanol has attracted attention worldwide as many types of cellulose wastes and harvests. because of its potential use as an alternative automotive fuel [4]. Generally, ethanol or bioethanol is more reactive than hydro- Use of ethanol as a fuel is not a new concept. In 1826, Samuel carbon fuels, such as gasoline [21]. It contains hydroxyl radicals as Morey developed an engine that ran on ethanol [5]. The use of the polar fraction and carbon chains as the non-polar fraction; ethanol blended with diesel was a subject of research in the 1980s. hence it can be easily dissolved in both non-polar (e.g. gasoline) At that time, it was shown that ethanol blends were technically and polar (e.g. water) substances [21]. Because of the regenerative acceptable as a fuel for existing engines. However, the relatively and biodegradable characteristics of ethanol, it is widely used high production cost of ethanol at that time hindered its regular as an alternative fuel at present. The use of gasoline containing use and made it a backup fuel in cases of fuel shortages. However, 3–10 vol% bioethanol is being promoted in many parts of the the economics have become much more favorable for the produc- world for last few years [22]. The use of pure ethanol requires tion of ethanol and it is now able to compete with standard some modifications to SI engines; thus low concentration blends petroleum-based fuel [6]. of ethanol are usually used without any modification of the SI Ethanol is a green fuel because the growing sugarcane crops engine [23]. Tables 1 and 2 show the advantages and disadvan- function as a CO2 sink, thereby contributing to the reduction of tages of using ethanol over gasoline. greenhouse gases (GHG) [7]. Recently, ethanol has been used exten- Worldwide ethanol production in terms of feedstock can be sively as a fuel additive or an alternative fuel in spark ignition (SI) categorized into three major groups [23]: engines as well as in diesel engines as it is a high octane, clean- burning fuel [8,9]. Burning of ethanol in SI engines also reduces 1. Ethanol from sucrose-containing biomass such as sugar cane, emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC), and so on, but sugar beet, sweet sorghum and fruits. there are some inconsistencies in NOx emissions as shown by many 2. Ethanol from starchy biomass such as corn, milo, wheat, rice, researchers. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) listed NOx as potato, cassava, sweet potatoes, and barley. one of the critical pollutants that can affect the respiratory system. As 3. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass such as wood, straw, and the use of ethanol
Recommended publications
  • Operation & Maintenance Manual E85 Compact Excavator
    Operation & Maintenance Manual E85 Compact Excavator S/N B34T11001 & Above 6990616 (6-13) Printed in U.S.A. © Bobcat Company 2013 OPERATOR SAFETY WARNING Operator must have instructions before operating the machine. Untrained WARNING operators can cause injury or death. W-2001-0502 Safety Alert Symbol: This symbol with a warning statement, means: “Warning, be alert! Your safety is involved!” Carefully read the message that follows. CORRECT WRONG CORRECT WRONG P-90216 B-19792 B-19751 B-19754 Never operate without Do not grasp control Never operate without Avoid steep areas or instructions. handles when entering approved cab. banks that could break cab. away. Read machine signs, and Never modify equipment. Operation & Maintenance Be sure controls are in Manual, and Operator’s neutral before starting. Never use attachments Handbook. not approved by Bobcat Sound horn and check Company. behind machine before starting. WRONG WRONG CORRECT CORRECT Maximum Maximum MS-1784 MS1785 B-19756 MS-1786 Use caution to avoid Keep bystanders out of Never exceed a 15 slope Never travel up a slope tipping - do not swing maximum reach area. to the side. that exceeds 15. heavy load over side of track. Do not travel or turn with bucket extended. Operate on flat, level ground. Never carry riders. CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT CORRECT STOP Maximum TS-2068A NA-1435B 6808261 B-21928 NA-1421A Never exceed 25 when To leave excavator, lower Fasten seat belt securely. Look in the direction of going down or backing the work equipment and rotation and make sure up a slope. the blade to the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Properties Comparison
    Alternative Fuels Data Center Fuel Properties Comparison Compressed Liquefied Low Sulfur Gasoline/E10 Biodiesel Propane (LPG) Natural Gas Natural Gas Ethanol/E100 Methanol Hydrogen Electricity Diesel (CNG) (LNG) Chemical C4 to C12 and C8 to C25 Methyl esters of C3H8 (majority) CH4 (majority), CH4 same as CNG CH3CH2OH CH3OH H2 N/A Structure [1] Ethanol ≤ to C12 to C22 fatty acids and C4H10 C2H6 and inert with inert gasses 10% (minority) gases <0.5% (a) Fuel Material Crude Oil Crude Oil Fats and oils from A by-product of Underground Underground Corn, grains, or Natural gas, coal, Natural gas, Natural gas, coal, (feedstocks) sources such as petroleum reserves and reserves and agricultural waste or woody biomass methanol, and nuclear, wind, soybeans, waste refining or renewable renewable (cellulose) electrolysis of hydro, solar, and cooking oil, animal natural gas biogas biogas water small percentages fats, and rapeseed processing of geothermal and biomass Gasoline or 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 1.12 B100 1 gal = 0.74 GGE 1 lb. = 0.18 GGE 1 lb. = 0.19 GGE 1 gal = 0.67 GGE 1 gal = 0.50 GGE 1 lb. = 0.45 1 kWh = 0.030 Diesel Gallon GGE GGE 1 gal = 1.05 GGE 1 gal = 0.66 DGE 1 lb. = 0.16 DGE 1 lb. = 0.17 DGE 1 gal = 0.59 DGE 1 gal = 0.45 DGE GGE GGE Equivalent 1 gal = 0.88 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 0.93 DGE 1 lb. = 0.40 1 kWh = 0.027 (GGE or DGE) DGE DGE B20 DGE DGE 1 gal = 1.11 GGE 1 kg = 1 GGE 1 gal = 0.99 DGE 1 kg = 0.9 DGE Energy 1 gallon of 1 gallon of 1 gallon of B100 1 gallon of 5.66 lb., or 5.37 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • How Practical Are Alternative Fuel Vehicles?
    How Practical Are Alternative Fuel Vehicles? Many of us have likely considered an alternative fuel vehicle at some point in our lives. Balancing the positives and negatives is a tricky process and varies greatly based on our personal situations. However, many of the negatives that previously created hesitancy have changed in recent years. Below, we have outlined a few of the most commonly mentioned negatives regarding the two leading alternative fuel vehicle types: Flex Fuel vehicles and Electric/Hybrid vehicles. Then, you can decide for yourself whether one of these vehicle types are practical for you! Cost – How much does the vehicle cost to purchase and operate? Flex Fuel: Flex Fuel vehicles typically cost about the same as a gasoline vehicle.1 For fuel cost, E85 typically costs slightly less than gasoline, however, due to decreased efficiency has a slightly higher cost per mile than gasoline.2 Overall, a Flex Fuel vehicle is likely to be slightly more expensive than a gasoline counterpart. Electric/Hybrid: This situation varies quite a bit depending on where you live. Electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles often cost considerably more than a conventional gasoline vehicle. For example, a plug-in hybrid will cost around $4000-$8000 more than a conventional model.3 However, there are federal rebates and local rebates that can refund thousands of dollars from the purchase price. Electric/Hybrid vehicles also tend to save money on fuel, with the possibility of saving thousands of dollars over the lifetime of the vehicle.4 Whether these rebates and fuel cost savings will eventually account for the higher purchase price can be estimated with comparison tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Oxides
    Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook WORLD BANK GROUP Effective July 1998 Nitrogen Oxides Nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the ambient air consist 1994). The United States generates about 20 mil- primarily of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen di- lion metric tons of nitrogen oxides per year, about oxide (NO2). These two forms of gaseous nitro- 40% of which is emitted from mobile sources. Of gen oxides are significant pollutants of the lower the 11 million to 12 million metric tons of nitrogen atmosphere. Another form, nitrous oxide (N2O), oxides that originate from stationary sources, is a greenhouse gas. At the point of discharge about 30% is the result of fuel combustion in large from man-made sources, nitric oxide, a colorless, industrial furnaces and 70% is from electric utility tasteless gas, is the predominant form of nitro- furnaces (Cooper and Alley 1986). gen oxide. Nitric oxide is readily converted to the much more harmful nitrogen dioxide by Occurrence in Air and Routes of Exposure chemical reaction with ozone present in the at- mosphere. Nitrogen dioxide is a yellowish-or- Annual mean concentrations of nitrogen dioxide ange to reddish-brown gas with a pungent, in urban areas throughout the world are in the irritating odor, and it is a strong oxidant. A por- range of 20–90 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/ tion of nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere is con- m3). Maximum half-hour values and maximum 24- verted to nitric acid (HNO3) and ammonium hour values of nitrogen dioxide can approach 850 salts. Nitrate aerosol (acid aerosol) is removed µg/m3 and 400 µg/m3, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Nox Emissions on the Road
    EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT REDUCING NOX EMISSIONS ON THE ROAD ENSURING FUTURE EXHAUSTS EMISSION LIMITS DELIVER AIR QUALITY STANDARDS Reducing NOx Emissions on the Road FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Transport Ministers noted the conclusions and recommendations of this report at the meeting of the Council of the ECMT in Dublin on 17-18 May 2006, and asked the Secretariat to transmit the report to the UN/ECE with a request to expedite deliberations on improved vehicle certification tests for NOx emissions for adoption world-wide. This was duly done. The ECMT is grateful to Heinz Steven of the RWTÜV Institute for Vehicle Technology in Germany for the analysis presented in this paper. The report was prepared by the ECMT Group on Transport and the Environment in co-operation with the OECD Environment Policy Committee’s Working Group on Transport. © ECMT, 2006 1 Reducing NOx Emissions on the Road TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................6 2. REVIEW OF EU AND UN-ECE REGULATIONS.....................................................................7 2.1 Cars and light duty vehicles ..........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the Nox Reaction Model for Development of Low-Nox Combustion Technology for Pulverized Coals by Using the Gas Phase Stoichiometric Ratio Index
    Energies 2011, 4, 545-562; doi:10.3390/en4030545 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Article Application of the NOx Reaction Model for Development of Low-NOx Combustion Technology for Pulverized Coals by Using the Gas Phase Stoichiometric Ratio Index Masayuki Taniguchi *, Yuki Kamikawa, Tsuyoshi Shibata, Kenji Yamamoto and Hironobu Kobayashi Energy and Environmental Systems Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd. Power Systems Company, 7-2-1 Omika-cho, Hitachi-shi, Ibaraki-ken, 319-1292, Japan; E-Mails: [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (T.S.); [email protected] (K.Y.); [email protected] (H.K.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-29-276-5889. Received: 9 December 2010; in revised form: 14 February 2011 / Accepted: 16 March 2011 / Published: 23 March 2011 Abstract: We previously proposed the gas phase stoichiometric ratio (SRgas) as an index to evaluate NOx concentration in fuel-rich flames. The SRgas index was defined as the amount of fuel required for stoichiometric combustion/amount of gasified fuel, where the amount of gasified fuel was the amount of fuel which had been released to the gas phase by pyrolysis, oxidation and gasification reactions. In the present study we found that SRgas was a good index to consider the gas phase reaction mechanism in fuel-rich pulverized coal flames. When SRgas < 1.0, NOx concentration was strongly influenced by the SRgas value. NOx concentration was also calculated by using a reaction model. The model was verified for various coals, particle diameters, reaction times, and initial oxygen concentrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report on the Department of Energy's Clean Cities 5-Year
    Summary Report on the Department of Energy’s Clean Cities 5-year Strategic Planning D. Welch and N. Nigro of Center for Climate and Energy Solutions July 2015 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Clean Cities Program Photo Credit: University of Rhode Island Photo Credit: Courtesy of Clean Airport Partnership, Inc. (This page intentionally left blank) Report Overview This report reflects stakeholder input to inform the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Cities’ strategic plan. The report focuses on comments made by stakeholders on key market opportunities for each alternative fuel and petroleum use reduction strategy. This report will be followed by a strategic plan that further refines the stakeholder input outlined here. Clean Cities is a DOE program that advances the nation’s economic, environmental, and energy security by supporting local actions to reduce petroleum use in the transportation sector. DOE Clean Cities has displaced nearly 7.5 billion gallons of petroleum since its inception in 1993. The program has nearly 100 coalitions across the country and works with nearly 14,000 stakeholders, including fleets, fuel suppliers, local governments, vehicle manufacturers, national laboratories, state and federal government agencies, and other organizations. DOE hosted a public meeting in Washington, D.C., on February 25, 2015, to seek input from an array of stakeholders to inform DOE’s Clean Cities program Five-Year Strategic Plan. Stakeholders provided feedback on six alternative fuel and petroleum use reduction strategies: natural gas, biofuels, consumer fuel economy, plug-in electric and hybrid-electric vehicles, propane, and idle reduction. DOE national laboratory experts presented briefing papers to stakeholders on economic, behavioral, and technical issues.
    [Show full text]
  • E85 Fueling Sites in Iowa
    Lake Mills Rock Rapids Sibley Lake Park Superior St Ansgar Inwood Swea City Milford Estherville Forest City Hull Hartley Graettinger Everly Mason City Floyd Sioux Center Sheldon Spencer Emmetsburg Garner New Hampton Orange City Algona Clear Lake Charles City Fredericksburg Sioux Rapids Marcus Pocahontas Humboldt Parkersburg New Hartford Cherokee Eagle Grove Hinton Waterloo Dubuque Sioux City Fort Dodge Manchester E85 Fueling Galva Cedar Falls Sergeant Bluff Farnhamville Holstein Roelyn Hudson Sloan Ida Grove Sites in Iowa Vinton Story City Marion Gilbert West Side Lidderdale Gladbrook Newhall Mapleton Carroll Ames Nevada Denison Walford Manning Clarence Clinton Grimes Ankeny Grinnell Dunlap Coralville Tipton Johnston Newton Des Moines Durant Woodbine Harlan DeSoto Urbandale Iowa City West Des Moines Pleasant Hill Davenport Shelby STATE OF IOWA Pella Neola Atlantic Stuart Norwalk Keota Muscatine Oskaloosa Fleet and Mail Services Delta Washington 301 E 7th Street Council Bluffs Des Moines, IA 50319-0250 Batavia Glenwood Red Oak Olds Phone: 515-281-5122 Lovilia Ottumwa Stanton Corning Mt Pleasant Fax: 515-281-6370 Fairfield West Burlington New Market Clarinda Centerville West Point Lamoni Fort Madison Why use E85 fuel? .. It reduces harmful emissions and helps protect the air we breathe. .. The State of Iowa supports E85 use. .. Ethanol is a renewable fuel made from corn grown in Iowa. .. Helps reduce our dependence on foreign oil. .. E85 keeps our energy dollars in Iowa, employing Iowans and stimulating Iowa’s economy. .. The Iowa Code requires 10% of all new vehicles purchased each year by the state to accept a flexible fuel such as E85. .. The Iowa Administrative Code requires state employees driving E85 vehicles to fuel up with E85 fuel whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Conditions for Biogas Vehicles
    REPORT Market conditions for biogas vehicles Tomas Rydberg, Mohammed Belhaj, Lisa Bolin, Maria Lindblad, Åke Sjödin, Christina Wolf B1947 April 2010 Report approved: 2010-10-20 John Munthe Scientific director Organization Report Summary IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. Project title Market conditions for biogas vehicles Address P.O. Box 5302 SE-400 14 Göteborg Project sponsor Swedish Road Administration Telephone +46 (0)31-725 62 00 Author Tomas Rydberg, Mohammed Belhaj, Lisa Bolin, Maria Lindblad, Åke Sjödin, Christina Wolf Title and subtitle of the report Market conditions for biogas vehicles Summary With a present share of biofuel used in the Swedish road transport sector of 5.2%, the opportunity for reaching the binding target of 10% by 2020 seem promising. It is both likely and desirable that biogas vehicles may make a significant contribution to fulfill Sweden’s obligation under the biofuels directive. It is likely because the stock of biogas (bi-fuel/CNG) vehicles in Sweden is increasing, as is the supply and demand of biogas. It is desirable, because biogas use in the road transport sector has not only climate benefits, but also benefits from an environmental (e.g. improved air quality due to lower emissions of regulated and unregulated air pollutants) and socio-economic (e.g. domestic production, employment) point of view. Keyword biogas, gas-fuelled vehicles, GHG, Bibliographic data IVL Report B1947 The report can be ordered via Homepage: www.ivl.se, e-mail: [email protected], fax+46 (0)8-598 563 90, or via IVL, P.O. Box 21060, SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden Market conditions for biogas vehicles IVL report B1947 Summary The present report, prepared by the Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL) on behalf of the Swedish Road Administration, analyses the market prerequisites for biogas vehicles and biogas used as motor fuel in view of the EU biofuels directive and the Swedish national target to switch to a fossil fuel independent vehicle fleet by before 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Fuel Economy Guide
    USING THE FUEL ECONOMY GUIDE The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Your Fuel Economy Will Vary U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) produce the Fuel EPA’s fuel economy values are good estimates of Economy Guide to help car buyers choose the most the fuel economy a typical driver will achieve under fuel-efficient vehicle that meets their needs. The Guide average driving conditions and provide a good is available on the Web at fueleconomy.gov. basis to compare one vehicle to another. Still, your fuel economy may be slightly higher or lower than Fuel Economy Estimates EPA’s estimates. Fuel economy varies, sometimes The purpose of EPA’s fuel economy estimates is to significantly, based on driving conditions, driving provide a reliable basis for comparing vehicles. style, and other factors. To ensure that estimates are consistent across Most vehicles in this guide (other than plug-in different makes and models, the EPA estimates hybrids) have three fuel economy estimates: are based on a standardized, repeatable testing • A "city" estimate that represents urban driving, procedure. These tests model an "average" driver’s in which a vehicle is started in the morning (after environment and behavior based on real-world being parked all night) and driven in stop-and-go conditions, such as stop-and-go traffic. traffic However, it is impossible for a single test to predict fuel economy precisely for all drivers in all CONTENTS • A "highway" estimate that represents a mixture of environments. For example, the following factors i Using the Fuel
    [Show full text]
  • ALTERNATIVE FUEL NEWS Volume 4 Number 4 February 2001
    Vol. 4 - No. 4 U. S. DEPARTMENT of ENERGY LTERNATIVELTERNATIVE UELUEL EWSEWS AnAA Official Publication of the Clean Cities Network FF and the Alternative NN Fuels Data Center From the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy TheThe AFVAFV ResaleResale Market Market GearingGearing upup toto putput cleanercleaner vehiclesvehicles onon thethe roadroad PLUS E85 Grows in Popularity A success story from Minnesota INSIDE: Up Close with Ford Interview with Beryl Stajich, Fleet/AFV Brand Team Manager Dear Readers, Happy New Year! This issue marks the start of the fifth volume of AFN. The Clean Cities net- work is growing, and more fleets are considering alternative fuels. “Industry old-timers” that have been using alternative fuels since the passage of Energy Policy Act of 1992 are beginning to replace their used alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) with new ones. Many of the used vehicles, however, still have a lot of life left in them. Used AFVs can offer fleets that are new to the world of alternative fuels a less expensive way to test the waters. Our cover story for this issue exam- ines the current used AFV market and describes a few local AFV resale efforts. Clean Cities not only promotes AFVs, but also—and perhaps more importantly—encourages the increased use of alternative fuel in AFVs. Flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs), with no incremental cost, were once considered the solution to the notorious chicken and egg problem of the alterna- tive fuel industry. FFVs are an attractive option for fleets, but if drivers do not fuel their vehicles with E85, FFVs contribute nothing to our clean air and petrole- um displacement goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends on Conventional Vehicle Emissions
    NREL/CP-540-46570. Posted with permission. Presented at the 2009 SAE Powertrain, Fuels, and Lubricants Meeting, 2-4 November 2009, San Antonio, Texas 2009-01-2723 Effects of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends on Conventional Vehicle Emissions Keith Knoll National Renewable Energy Laboratory Brian West, Shean Huff, John Thomas Oak Ridge National Laboratory John Orban, Cynthia Cooper Battelle Memorial Institute ABSTRACT reductions in NMHC and CO were observed, as was a statistically significant increase in NOX emissions. Tests were conducted during 2008 on 16 late-model, Effects of ethanol on NMOG and NMHC emissions were conventional vehicles (1999 through 2007) to determine found to also be influenced by power-to-weight ratio, short-term effects of mid-level ethanol blends on while the effects on NOX emissions were found to be performance and emissions. Vehicle odometer readings influenced by engine displacement. ranged from 10,000 to 100,000 miles, and all vehicles conformed to federal emissions requirements for their federal certification level. The LA92 drive cycle, also INTRODUCTION known as the Unified Cycle, was used for testing as it was considered to more accurately represent real-world The United States’ Energy Independence and Security acceleration rates and speeds than the Federal Test Act (EISA) of 2007 calls on the nation to significantly Procedure (FTP) used for emissions certification testing. increase its use of renewable fuels to meet its Test fuels were splash-blends of up to 20 volume transportation energy needs.1 The law establishes a new percent ethanol with federal certification gasoline. Both renewable fuel standard (RFS) that requires 36 billion regulated and unregulated air-toxic emissions were gallons of renewable fuel to be used in the on-road measured.
    [Show full text]