Gnetophyta. Class and Ordinal Rank, Respectively

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gnetophyta. Class and Ordinal Rank, Respectively Pan-Coniferae P. D. Cantino, M. J. Donoghue, and J. A. Doyle in P.D. Cantino et al. (2007): E20 [J. A. Doyle, P. D. Cantino, and M. J. Donoghue], converted clade name Registration Number: 77 Diagnostic Apomorphies: Based on a phy- logenetic tree that included Gnetophyta Definition: The total clade of the crown clade within Coniferae, Doyle (2006: Fig. 11) listed Coniferae. This is a crown-based total-clade the following synapomorphies for the clade definition. Abbreviated definition: otal V of labeled "Conifers" (including Emporia but not Coniferae. Cordaitales and corresponding roughly to Pan- Coniferae as defined here): leaves with a single Etymology: From the Greek pan- or pantos (all, vein (modified to several-veined within some the whole), indicating that the name refers to groups such as Agathis and Nageia), compound a total clade, and Coniferae (see entry in this female strobili but simple male strobili, bilateral volume for erymology), the name of the corre- (dorsiventral) symmetry in ovuliferous short sponding crown clade. shoots (modified into cone scales in extant taxa), inverted ovules, and sarcotesta absent or Reference Phylogeny: The reference phylogeny uniseriate. Of these, the sarcotesta character is Doyle (2006: Fig. 8). is questionable because it is unclear whether a sarcotesta is present or absent in the immature Composition: Coniferae (this volume) and all ovules of Emporia (Mapes and Rothwell, 1984). extinct plants that share more recent ancestry with Coniferae than with any other extant seed Synonyms: The names Pinopsida, Coniferophyta, plants. Morphological homologies between Coniferopsida, and Coniferales, which are listed extant and Palacozoic conifers and Cordaitales as approximate synonyms of Coniferae (this vol- proposed by Florin (1951) could be evidence ume), as well as Coniferae itself, could equally that cordaites in but well be to belong Pan-Coniferae, considered be approximate synonyms this isthe uncertain, because Florin (1949) adduced ofPan-Coniferae, since authors have rarely made similar evidence that Ginkgo and related fossils it clear whether these names apply to the crown, are also related to Cordaitales. In phylogenetic the total clade, or an intermediate clade analyses that include fossils, depending in part on the position of Ginkgo, Pan-Coniferae may Comments: We prefer the name. Pan-Coniferae include Cordaitales, Palaeozoic conifers such as rather than its approximate synonyms because Emporia and Lebachia, both, or neither (Crane, the name Coniferae (as defined in this volume) 1985; Doyle and Donoghue, 1986; Rothwell is unambiguous and neither Coniferae nor and Serbet, 1994; Doyle, 1996, 2006, 2008; Pan-Coniferae has any implication of rank. As Hilton and Bateman, 2006). Because of uncer discussed in the entry on Coniferae (this vol- tainty whether the clade Gnetophyta is part of ume), the names Pinopsida, Coniferophyta, and Coniferae see Coniferae in this volume), Pan- Coniferopsida have been used in broader senses. Coniferae may, similarly, include or exclude Moreover, the endings -opsida and -ales imply Gnetophyta. class and ordinal rank, respectively. Pan-Coniferae Literature Cited Hilton,J., and R. M. Bateman. 2006. Pteridosperms are the backbone of seed-plant phylogeny. ]. Cantino, P D., J. A. Doyle, S. W. Graham, W. S. Torey Bot. Soc.133:119-168. Judd, R. G. Olmstead, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, Mapes, G., and G. W. Rothwell. 1984. and M. J. Donoghue. 2007. Towards a phy- Permineralized ovulate cones of Lebachia logenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon from late Palaeozoic limestones of Kansas. 56:822-846 and E1-E44. Palaeontology 27:69-94. Crane, P. R. 1985. Phylogenetic analysis of seed Rothwell, G. W, and R. Serbet. 1994. Lignophyte plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. phylogeny and the evolution of spermato- Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:716-793. phytes: a numerical cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. Doyle, J. A. 1996. Seed plant phylogeny and the 19:443-482. relationships of Gnetales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157 (suppl):$3-S39. Authors Doyle, J. A. 2006. Seed ferns and the origin of angiosperms. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 133: James A. Doyle; Department of Evolution and 169-209. Ecology; Universiry of California; Davis, CA Doyle, J. A. 2008. Integrating molecular phyloge 95616, USA. Email: [email protected]. netic and paleobotanical evidence on origin of Philip D. Cantino; Department of Environmental the flower. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169:816-843. and Plant Biology: Ohio University; Athens, Doyle, J. A., and M. J. Donoghue. 1986. Seed plant OH 45701, USA. Email: [email protected]. phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an Michael J. Donoghue; Department of Ecology and experimental cladistic approach. Bot. Reu Evolutionary Biology: Yale University; P.O. 52:321-431. Box 208106; New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Florin, R. 1949. The morphology of Trichopitys het- Email: [email protected]. eromorpha Saporta, a seed-plant of Palaeozoic age, and the evolution of the female ffow- ers in the Ginkgoinae. Acta Horti Bergiani Date Accepted: 29 August 2011; updated 09 15:79-109. February 2018 Florin, R. 1951. Evolution in cordaites and conifers. Acta Horti Bergiani 15:285-388. Primary Editor: Kevin de Queiroz 270 Coniferae A. L. Jussieu 1789: 411 [J.A. Doyle, P. D. Cantino, and M. J. Donoghue]. Converted clade name Registration Number: 31 see Diagnostic Apomorphies) is absent in Gnetophyta (Raubeson and Jansen, 1992). Most Definition: The smallest crown clade con- analyses based on morphology (see Comments) taining Pinus strobus Linnaeus 1753, Cupressus have not supported inclusion of sempervirens Linnaeus 1753, Podocarpus mac- Gnetophyt, but the clade Gnetophyta is nested in Coniferae rophyllus (Thunberg) Sweet 1818 (originally in some most-parsimonious trees in the mor- described as Taxus macrophylla Thunberg 1783), phological analysis of Doyle (2008). Although and Taxus baccata Linnaeus 1753. This is a min- Emporia (a Palacozoic conifer) or Emporia and imum-crown-clade definition. Abbreviated def- Cordaitales are part of Coniférae, as defined here, inition: min crown V (Pinus strobus Linnaeus in some of the trees of Rothwell and Serbet 1753 & Cupressus sempervirens Linnaeus 1753 (1994: Figs. 2a,b), this is not the case in their & Podocarpus macrophylus (Thunberg) Sweet other equally parsimonious trees (Figs. 1, 2c,d), 1818 &Taxus baccata Linnaeus 1753). or in those of other authors (Miller, 1999; Doyle, 1996, 2006, 2008; Hilton and Bateman, Etymology: Derived from Latin, conus (cone) 2006). and ferre (to carry or bear). Diagnostic Apomorphies: Synapomorphies Reference Phylogeny: The reference phylogeny relative to other crown clades include one- is Rydin et al. (2002: Fig. 1). See also Rai et al. veined needlelike leaves (modiied to several- (2008: Figs. 1, 2), Leslie et al. (2012: Fig. S4), veined in some groups), resin canals, compound Lu et al. (2014: Fig. 1), and Ruhfel et al. (2014: female strobili but simple male strobili, Fig. 5). tiered proembryos, siphonogamy (Doyle and Donoghue, 1986; Rothwell and Serbet, 1994; Composition: Araucariaceae, Cephalotaxaceae, Doyle, 2006, 2008), and loss or extreme reduc- Cupressaceae including "Taxodiaceae"), tion of one copy of the inverted repeat in the Pinaceae, Podocarpaceae, Taxaceae, and chloroplast genome (Raubeson and Jansen, Sciadopitys. The clade Gnetophyta (this volume) 1992; Wakasugi et al., 1994). Siphonogamy in is included within Coniferae in some trees based Coniferae is not with that in on homologous angio- molecular data et (Bowe al., 2000; Chaw et sperms and gnetophytes if phylogenies such as al, 2000; et Sanderson al., 2000; Gugerli et al., those of Crane (1985), Doyle and 2001; Donoghue Magallón and Sanderson, 2002; (1986), and (1996) are but it and Burleigh Doyle correct, Mathews, 2004; Zhong et al., 2010, may be with in the 2011; Xi homologous siphonogamy et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2014; Ruhfel latter groups in phylogenies that link Coniferae 2014), but not in others (Sanderson et with angiosperms and gnetophytes (Nixon et al., 2000; Magallón and Sanderson, 2002 al., 1994; Rothwell and Serbet, 1994; Doyle, Kydin et al., 2002; Burleigh and Mathews, 2006: Fig. 6), and it is presumably homologous 2004; Rai et al., The 2008). chloroplast-DNA with in if the latrer are Structural mutation siphonogamy Gnetophyta that characterizes coniters nested in Coniferae. Coniferae Synonyms: Pinopsida, Coniferophyta, our preference for names that are descriptive Coniferopsida, and Coniferales are approximate or end in phyta (meaning plants) rather than synonyms (see Comments). having an ending that is meaningless except in indicating rank, Coniferae and Coniferopyta are Comments: Many molecular analyses (e.g. the best candidate names for this clade. Here Stefanovic et al., 1998; Bowe et al., 2000; Chaw and previously (Cantino et al., 2007), we have et al., 2000; Gugerli et al., 2001; Magallón and chosen Coniferae over Coniferophyta because the Sanderson, 2002; Rydin et al., 2002; Soltis et informal names "coniferophytes" and "conifer- used tradi- al., 2002; Rai et al., 2008; Zhong et al., 2010, opsids" (generally synonymously) 2011; Leslie et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2014; Ruhfel tionally referred to a hypothesized larger group et al., 2014) and a morphologica. an ysis that includes Ginkgo and Cordaitales as well as Coulter and Chamberlain, 1910; (Hart, 1987) of extant conifers agreed that the conifers (e.g., clade Pinaceae or a clade comprising Pinaceae Chamberlain, 1935; Foster and Gifford, 1974). and Gnetophyta (see below) is sister to the rest The name Coniferophyta, which is not defined of the conifers. However, phylogenetic analyses in this volume, is best reserved for this larger based on morphology have variously suggested group in the context of phylogenies in which that the clade Taxaceae is the extant sister to the it is a clade (e.g, Crane, 1985; Doyle and rest (Miller, 1988, 1999; Rothwell and Serbet, Donoghue, 1986; Doyle, 1996, 2008). 1994), that a clade comprising Podocarpaceae Cited and Pinaceae occupies this position (Doyle, Literature 1996; Hilton and Bateman, 2006), or that the Bowe, L. M., G. Coat, and C. W. dePamphilis. of is unresolved relative position Podocarpaceae 2000.
Recommended publications
  • Antarctic Bryophyte Research—Current State and Future Directions
    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 221–233 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.16 Antarctic bryophyte research—current state and future directions PAULO E.A.S. CÂMARA1, MicHELine CARVALHO-SILVA1 & MicHAEL STecH2,3 1Departamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília, Brazil UnB; �[email protected]; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-996X �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-3804 2Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands; 3Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9804-0120 Abstract Botany is one of the oldest sciences done south of parallel 60 °S, although few professional botanists have dedicated themselves to investigating the Antarctic bryoflora. After the publications of liverwort and moss floras in 2000 and 2008, respectively, new species were described. Currently, the Antarctic bryoflora comprises 28 liverwort and 116 moss species. Furthermore, Antarctic bryology has entered a new phase characterized by the use of molecular tools, in particular DNA sequencing. Although the molecular studies of Antarctic bryophytes have focused exclusively on mosses, molecular data (fingerprinting data and/or DNA sequences) have already been published for 36 % of the Antarctic moss species. In this paper we review the current state of Antarctic bryological research, focusing on molecular studies and conservation, and discuss future questions of Antarctic bryology in the light of global challenges. Keywords: Antarctic flora, conservation, future challenges, molecular phylogenetics, phylogeography Introduction The Antarctic is the most pristine, but also most extreme region on Earth in terms of environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • New Paleobotanical Data on the Portuguese Pennsylvanian (Douro Carboniferous Basin, NW Portugal)
    Versão online: http://www.lneg.pt/iedt/unidades/16/paginas/26/30/185 Comunicações Geológicas (2014) 101, Especial I, 409-414 IX CNG/2º CoGePLiP, Porto 2014 ISSN: 0873-948X; e-ISSN: 1647-581X New paleobotanical data on the Portuguese Pennsylvanian (Douro Carboniferous Basin, NW Portugal) Novos dados paleobotânicos do Pensilvaniano português (Bacia Carbonífera do Douro, NW Portugal) P. Correia1*, Z. Šimůnek2, J. Pšenička3, A. A. Sá4,5, R. Domingos6, A. Carneiro7, D. Flores1,7 Artigo Curto Short Article © 2014 LNEG – Laboratório Nacional de Geologia e Energia IP Abstract: This paper describes nine new macrofloral taxa from 1. Introduction Douro Carboniferous Basin (lower Gzhelian) of Portugal. The plant assemblage is mainly composed by pteridophylls (Sphenopteriss The fossil flora of Carboniferous of Portugal is still little arberi Kidston, Sphenopteris fayoli Zeiller, Sphenopteris tenuis known. The new megafloral occurrences recently found in Schenk, Odontopteris schlotheimii Brongniart), sphenopsids the Upper Pennsylvanian strata of Douro Carboniferous (Annularia spicata Gutbier, Stellotheca robusta (Feistmantel) Basin (DCB) provide new and important data about Surange and Prakash, Calamostachys grandis Zeiller (Jongmans) and Calamostachys calathifera Sterzel) besides the gymnosperm paleobotanical richness and diversity of the Paleozoic Cordaites foliolatus Grand`Eury. The new data provide a better floras of Portugal offering more information to previous understating of the knowledge of Late Carboniferous floras of researches reported from diverse localities and by different Portugal, showing the high plant diversity of Gzhelian floras, when authors (e.g. Wenceslau de Lima, Bernardino António considerable changes in paleogeography and climate dynamics are Gomes, Carlos Ribeiro, Carríngton da Costa, Carlos evidenced in Euramerican floristic assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Evolution an Introduction to the History of Life
    Plant Evolution An Introduction to the History of Life KARL J. NIKLAS The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London CONTENTS Preface vii Introduction 1 1 Origins and Early Events 29 2 The Invasion of Land and Air 93 3 Population Genetics, Adaptation, and Evolution 153 4 Development and Evolution 217 5 Speciation and Microevolution 271 6 Macroevolution 325 7 The Evolution of Multicellularity 377 8 Biophysics and Evolution 431 9 Ecology and Evolution 483 Glossary 537 Index 547 v Introduction The unpredictable and the predetermined unfold together to make everything the way it is. It’s how nature creates itself, on every scale, the snowflake and the snowstorm. — TOM STOPPARD, Arcadia, Act 1, Scene 4 (1993) Much has been written about evolution from the perspective of the history and biology of animals, but significantly less has been writ- ten about the evolutionary biology of plants. Zoocentricism in the biological literature is understandable to some extent because we are after all animals and not plants and because our self- interest is not entirely egotistical, since no biologist can deny the fact that animals have played significant and important roles as the actors on the stage of evolution come and go. The nearly romantic fascination with di- nosaurs and what caused their extinction is understandable, even though we should be equally fascinated with the monarchs of the Carboniferous, the tree lycopods and calamites, and with what caused their extinction (fig. 0.1). Yet, it must be understood that plants are as fascinating as animals, and that they are just as important to the study of biology in general and to understanding evolutionary theory in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World
    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Conifer Trees in Iowa This Publication Is Designed to Help Identify the Most Common Trees Found in Iowa
    Identification of Conifer Trees in Iowa This publication is designed to help identify the most common trees found in Iowa. It is based on vegetative characteristics including leaves, fruit, and bark. It is neither complete nor without possible oversights. Separate species are grouped by similar characteristics, mainly based on type and arrangement of leaves. These groups are; awl- or scale- like needles; single needles, flattened with rounded tips; single needles, square in cross section, with pointed tips; and needles in bundles or fasticles of two or more. Remember, vegetative character- istics are quite variable; use more than one specimen for comparison. Awl- or scale-like needles Juniperus Virginiana Eastern Red Cedar Leaves are dark green; leaves are both awl- and scale-like; cone is dark blue and berry-like. Thuja occidentalis Northern White Cedar Leaves are flattened and only of the scale type; cones have 4-6 scales; foliage is light green. Juniperus communis Common Juniper Leaves are awl shaped; cone is dark blue and berry-like. Pm-1383 | May 1996 Single needles, flattened with rounded tips Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir Needles occur on raised pegs; 3/4-11/4 inches in length; cones have 3-pointed bracts between the cone scales. Abies balsamea Abies concolor Balsam Fir White (Concolor) Fir Needles are blunt and notched at Needles are somewhat pointed, the tip; 3/4-11/2 inches in length. curved towards the branch top and 11/2-3 inches in length; silver green in color. Single needles, Picea abies Norway Spruce square in cross Needles are 1/2-1 inch long; section, with needles are dark green; foliage appears to droop or weep; cone pointed tips is 4-7 inches long.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorophyta Is a Division of Green Algae, Informally Called
    Chlorophyta is a division of green algae, informally waters of the Sargasso Sea. Many brown algae, such as called chlorophytes. The name is used in two very members of the order Fucales, commonly grow along different senses so that care is needed to determine the rocky seashores. Some members of the class are used as use by a particular author. In older classification food for humans. systems, it refers to a highly paraphyletic group of all Worldwide there are about 1500–2000 species of brown the green algae within the green plants (Viridiplantae), algae.[4] Some species are of sufficient commercial and thus includes about 7,000 species [4] [5] of mostly importance, such as Ascophyllum nodosum , that they aquatic photosynthetic eukaryotic organisms. Like the have become subjects of extensive research in their own land plants (bryophytes and tracheophytes), green algae right.[5] [4] contain chlorophylls a and b, and store food as starch Brown algae belong to a very large group, the in their plastids. Heterokontophyta, a eukaryotic group of organisms In newer classifications, it refers to one of the two distinguished most prominently by having chloroplasts clades making up the Viridiplantae, which are the surrounded by four membranes, suggesting an origin chlorophytes and the streptophytes or charophytes.[6][7] from a symbiotic relationship between a basal In this sense it includes only about 4,300 species.[3] eukaryote and another eukaryotic organism. Most brown algae contain the pigment fucoxanthin, which is responsible for the distinctive greenish-brown color that The red algae, or Rhodophyta ( / r o ʊ ˈ d ɒ f ɨ t ə / or / gives them their name.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Germination and Genetic Structure of Two Salvia Species In
    Seed germination and genetic structure of two Salvia species in response to environmental variables among phytogeographic regions in Jordan (Part I) and Phylogeny of the pan-tropical family Marantaceae (Part II). Dissertation Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat) Vorgelegt der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I Biowissenschaften der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Von Herrn Mohammad Mufleh Al-Gharaibeh Geb. am: 18.08.1979 in: Irbid-Jordan Gutachter/in 1. Prof. Dr. Isabell Hensen 2. Prof. Dr. Martin Roeser 3. Prof. Dr. Regina Classen-Bockhof Halle (Saale), den 10.01.2017 Copyright notice Chapters 2 to 4 have been either published in or submitted to international journals or are in preparation for publication. Copyrights are with the authors. Just the publishers and authors have the right for publishing and using the presented material. Therefore, reprint of the presented material requires the publishers’ and authors’ permissions. “Four years ago I started this project as a PhD project, but it turned out to be a long battle to achieve victory and dreams. This dissertation is the culmination of this long process, where the definition of “Weekend” has been deleted from my dictionary. It cannot express the long days spent in analyzing sequences and data, battling shoulder to shoulder with my ex- computer (RIP), R-studio, BioEdite and Microsoft Words, the joy for the synthesis, the hope for good results and the sadness and tiredness with each attempt to add more taxa and analyses.” “At the end, no phrase can describe my happiness when I saw the whole dissertation is printed out.” CONTENTS | 4 Table of Contents Summary ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Flagellates – the New Recently Discovered Deep Branches of the Eukaryotic Tree and Their Evolutionary and Ecological Significance
    Protistology 14 (1), 15–22 (2020) Protistology Predatory flagellates – the new recently discovered deep branches of the eukaryotic tree and their evolutionary and ecological significance Denis V. Tikhonenkov Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, 152742, Russia | Submitted March 20, 2020 | Accepted April 6, 2020 | Summary Predatory protists are poorly studied, although they are often representing important deep-branching evolutionary lineages and new eukaryotic supergroups. This short review/opinion paper is inspired by the recent discoveries of various predatory flagellates, which form sister groups of the giant eukaryotic clusters on phylogenetic trees, and illustrate an ancestral state of one or another supergroup of eukaryotes. Here we discuss their evolutionary and ecological relevance and show that the study of such protists may be essential in addressing previously puzzling evolutionary problems, such as the origin of multicellular animals, the plastid spread trajectory, origins of photosynthesis and parasitism, evolution of mitochondrial genomes. Key words: evolution of eukaryotes, heterotrophic flagellates, mitochondrial genome, origin of animals, photosynthesis, predatory protists, tree of life Predatory flagellates and diversity of eu- of the hidden diversity of protists (Moon-van der karyotes Staay et al., 2000; López-García et al., 2001; Edg- comb et al., 2002; Massana et al., 2004; Richards The well-studied multicellular animals, plants and Bass, 2005; Tarbe et al., 2011; de Vargas et al., and fungi immediately come to mind when we hear 2015). In particular, several prevailing and very abun- the term “eukaryotes”. However, these groups of dant ribogroups such as MALV, MAST, MAOP, organisms represent a minority in the real diversity MAFO (marine alveolates, stramenopiles, opistho- of evolutionary lineages of eukaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Sulphur Dioxide on Selected Hepatics" (1978)
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1978 The ffecE ts of Sulphur Dioxide on Selected Hepatics Steven L. Gatchel Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Botany at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Gatchel, Steven L., "The Effects of Sulphur Dioxide on Selected Hepatics" (1978). Masters Theses. 3192. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/3192 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PAPF-:R CERTIFICATE #2 TO: Graduate Degree Candidates who have written formal theses. SUBJECT: Permission to reproduce theses. The University Library is receiving a ' number of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow theses to be copied. Please sign one of the following statements: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's library or research holdings. Date Author I respectfully request Booth Library of .Eastern Illinois University not allow my thesis be reproduced because---------------- Date Author pdm THE EFFECTS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE ON SELECTED HEPATICS (TITLE} BY Steven L. Gatchel THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1978 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE GRADUATE DEGREE CITED ABOVE ol}-~ d2/, 19"/f DATE ADVISER I/ 'Ouue~2\ 1\l~ DATE ' ~RTMENT WHEAD THE EFFECTS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE ON SELECTED HEPATICS BY STEVEN L.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae
    Glime, J. M. 2021. Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae. Chapt. 1-11. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte 1-11-1 Ecology. Volume 4. Habitat and Role. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 11 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1-11: AQUATIC AND WET MARCHANTIOPHYTA, ORDER METZGERIALES: ANEURACEAE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCLASS METZGERIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Order Metzgeriales............................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneuraceae ................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura maxima ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-11-2 Aneura mirabilis .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-7 Aneura pinguis ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Plant Phylogeny: Demise of the Anthophyte Hypothesis? Michael J
    bb10c06.qxd 02/29/2000 04:18 Page R106 R106 Dispatch Seed plant phylogeny: Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Michael J. Donoghue* and James A. Doyle† Recent molecular phylogenetic studies indicate, The first suggestions that Gnetales are related to surprisingly, that Gnetales are related to conifers, or angiosperms were based on several obvious morphological even derived from them, and that no other extant seed similarities — vessels in the wood, net-veined leaves in plants are closely related to angiosperms. Are these Gnetum, and reproductive organs made up of simple, results believable? Is this a clash between molecules unisexual, flower-like structures, which some considered and morphology? evolutionary precursors of the flowers of wind-pollinated Amentiferae, but others viewed as being reduced from Addresses: *Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. †Section of Evolution and more complex flowers in the common ancestor of Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA. angiosperms, Gnetales and Mesozoic Bennettitales [1]. E-mail: [email protected] These ideas went into eclipse with evidence that simple [email protected] flowers really are a derived, rather than primitive, feature Current Biology 2000, 10:R106–R109 of the Amentiferae, and that vessels arose independently in angiosperms and Gnetales. Vessels in angiosperms 0960-9822/00/$ – see front matter seem derived from tracheids with scalariform pits, whereas © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. in Gnetales they resemble tracheids with circular bor- dered pits, as in conifers. Gnetales are also like conifers in These are exciting times for those interested in plant lacking scalariform pitting in the primary xylem, and in evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecophysiology of Four Co-Occurring Lycophyte Species: an Investigation of Functional Convergence
    Research Article Ecophysiology of four co-occurring lycophyte species: an investigation of functional convergence Jacqlynn Zier, Bryce Belanger, Genevieve Trahan and James E. Watkins* Department of Biology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346, USA Received: 22 June 2015; Accepted: 7 November 2015; Published: 24 November 2015 Associate Editor: Tim J. Brodribb Citation: Zier J, Belanger B, Trahan G, Watkins JE. 2015. Ecophysiology of four co-occurring lycophyte species: an investigation of functional convergence. AoB PLANTS 7: plv137; doi:10.1093/aobpla/plv137 Abstract. Lycophytes are the most early divergent extant lineage of vascular land plants. The group has a broad global distribution ranging from tundra to tropical forests and can make up an important component of temperate northeast US forests. We know very little about the in situ ecophysiology of this group and apparently no study has eval- uated if lycophytes conform to functional patterns expected by the leaf economics spectrum hypothesis. To determine factors influencing photosynthetic capacity (Amax), we analysed several physiological traits related to photosynthesis to include stomatal, nutrient, vascular traits, and patterns of biomass distribution in four coexisting temperate lycophyte species: Lycopodium clavatum, Spinulum annotinum, Diphasiastrum digitatum and Dendrolycopodium dendroi- deum. We found no difference in maximum photosynthetic rates across species, yet wide variation in other traits. We also found that Amax was not related to leaf nitrogen concentration and is more tied to stomatal conductance, suggestive of a fundamentally different sets of constraints on photosynthesis in these lycophyte taxa compared with ferns and seed plants. These findings complement the hydropassive model of stomatal control in lycophytes and may reflect canaliza- tion of function in this group.
    [Show full text]