A Perspective on Operational Complexity in

About Brexit, Regulation, Sustainability and Tech

Beate Born Executive Director, UBS CH AG MiFID II & Brexit WM Global Program Lead

Feb 2019 Introduction – Focus of this Presentation

Operational Risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events.

Operational risk factors • Internal: System, People, Process, Culture failures • External: External influences

External Influences • Integration vs. protectionism (e.g. Brexit) • Regulations, their development complexity and speed (ongoing phenomenon?) • Geopolitical Developments (e.g. Sustainability goals the responsibility of the financial market?) • Technological Advancement (e.g. Robotics and AI for financial services))

External environments are changing very quickly with overwhelming complexity. are being held responsible for their own actions, their client's actions and the macro-effects on the global community more than ever before.

1 Beate Born Table of Contents

Section 1: Trends in financial services and operational risk – Complexity as a main Challenge

Section 2: External Factors of Complexity: Integration, the EU, Single Market Access and Equivalence

2a) Integration, Globalization and Protectionism

2b) The EU, EEA, EFTA and the G20 as Players in the International Law making Process

2c) The single European Market and the Concept of Passporting

2d) Equivalence – an Attempt to Reduce Complexity

Section 3: Brexit Impacts on Financial Services and Brexit Implications at UBS

Section 4: Sustainability – the next Level of Complexity (in Regulation) Section 5: Complexities of Regulatory Implementation in the Firm

Section 6: Technology: How Fintech & RegTech change our processes, platforms and data management

2 Beate Born Section 1

Trends in Financial Services and Operational Risk - Complexity as a main Challenge

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Main Points of Section 1

Trends in Financial Services and Operational Risk - Complexity as a main Challenge

Operational Risk… • … has changed over the years • … has had to put a focus external influences • … is a cost center struggling to efficiently reduce ever increasing complexity of an ever changing environment

4 Beate Born Operational Risk in Financial Services - Setting the Scene

Operational Risk… …is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. - Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 2006

In other words… … operational risk is anything that happens between the creation and the sale of the product that takes away from revenue and is not directly related to production costs. For example:

Operational Risk Types External Influence

Culture Failure

Process Failure

People Failure

Systems Failure

5 Beate Born Operational Risk in Financial Services - Current Trends and Challenges

Operational Risk… …is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. - Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 2006

Culture Failure External Influences • Faulty incentives leading to Geopolitical (Brexit, Trump etc.) misconduct • • Volatile Regulatory Environment • Acceptance of Risk Mgmt practice in External Influence Sanctions, fines the Business • • Global trends of globalization and Culture Failure segregation People Failure • Cyber attacks Process Failure • Human Error Fraud • Process Failure • Misconduct People Failure • Organizational Change Systems Failure • Outsourcing Issues • Risk Control failure System Failure • Outages (internal or of providers) • Capacity limitations • Disruptions from new solutions • New Trends (cloud computing, big data etc.) … and the ever present challenge: COSTS 6 Beate Born Section 2

External Factors of Complexity: Integration, the EU, Single Market Access and Equivalence

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Main Points of Section 2

External Factors of Complexity: Integration, the EU, Single Market Access, Equivalence and Brexit

Globalization, Integration, Protectionism • Financial Services benefited greatly from globalization trends, but is now struggling with the complexity of the reverse effects. • Separation vs Integration – the fear of loosing control in fast moving technological environments and economic decline

The EU • The European landscape is made up of several groups: EEA, EU, Eurozone, EFTA • Switzerland and the UK are (will be) part of the Geography, but not part of the groups • Some EU members are also part of the G20

Single Market, Passporting, Equivalence • Single Market Access and Passporting – the importance of subsidiaries for 3rd country firms • Financial regulation has become politicized • Equivalence can only solve a limited amount of problems

Brexit • We know what we don't know • Brexit and UBS – yet another story of complexity • Why financial services need a transition period 8 Beate Born Section 2a

Integration, globalization and Protectionism

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Globalization, Integration, Protectionism

Globalization, Integration, Protectionism

Past Developments - Globalization • Pros: Globalization has opened up the global market, fostered integration, created the internet and information sharing • Cons: Globalization has also facilitated the Global financial Crisis, terrorism, fraud, propaganda etc.

Current Developments • Reverse activities are becoming prominent: Protectionism rather than integration • Brexit, Trump etc. • Impacts for Financial Services and Operational risk • Influx of regulations / sanctions • Restrictions of global activities • Complex global market to navigate

Financial Services benefited greatly from globalization trends, but is now struggling to keep up with the complexity of the reverse effects.

10 Beate Born

Segregation in Unification – the Challenge of Complexity

Common Understanding Dispersion of National Alignment of Approaches of the Goal Approaches (partial)

Decisions / Agreements National Implementation Simplification (of inter- & intra-governmental organizations, e.g. UN / G20) Equivalence Single Market EEA (31) Climate Change Privacy Provisions Access (30) EU EFTA Standards, Derivatives (28) CH Passporting Tax Evasion (4) Taxonomies Market UK EURO G20 (19) EU Regulations Bilateral Financial Market (20 + EU) AML vs Directives Agreements Stability

Goals Solutions Aligned Solutions

11 Beate Born Section 2b

The EU, EEA, EFTA and the G20 as Players in the International Law making Process

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management UK and Switzerland in the European Union and G20 Community

• European Economic Area*: • 31 Members, • 27 of which are part of the EU • 19 of which are part of the Eurozone EEA • 3 of which are part of the EFTA (31) • 4 of which are part of the G20 The European Union : (30) Switzerland: part of the • 28 Members EU EFTA • 19 of which are part of the Eurozone • 4 of which are part of the G20 (28) EFTA (4) CH UK: part of the EEA, the EURO G20 and the EU* UK* (19) European Free Trade Association : G20 • 4 Members, (20 + EU) • 3 of which are part of the EEA (not the EU)

The G20: • 20 Members Eurozone: 4 of which are part of the EEA and the EU • • 19 Members, 3 of which are part of the Eurozone • all of which are part of the EU and • the EEA • 3 of which are part of the G20 * Pre-Brexit

The coordination of 40+ players in the international financial markets, makes financial regulatory reform increasingly difficult.

Beate Born

Segregation in Unification – the Challenge of Complexity

Common Understanding Dispersion of National Alignment of Approaches of the Goal Approaches (partial)

Decisions / Agreements National Implementation Simplification (of inter- & intra-governmental organizations, e.g. UN / G20) Equivalence Single Market EEA (31) Climate Change Privacy Provisions Access (30) EU EFTA Standards, Derivatives (28) CH Passporting Tax Evasion (4) Taxonomies Market UK EURO G20 (19) EU Regulations Bilateral Financial Market (20 + EU) AML vs Directives Agreements Stability

Goals Solutions Aligned Solutions

Beate Born Section 2c

The Single European Market and the Concept of Passporting

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Main Points of Section 2c

The Single European Market and the Concept of Passporting

Single Market… • … eliminates borders for goods and services • … accessed by members of the EEA only • … still need a passport to access it

… Passports • … only granted within the EEA by the home NCA • … granted to firms, not countries • … subsidiaries are a way for non-EEA firms to access the single European Market • … via Brexit UK firms will loose 340k passports

16 Beate Born

Segregation in Unification – the Challenge of Complexity

Common Understanding Dispersion of National Alignment of Approaches of the Goal Approaches (partial)

Decisions / Agreements National Implementation Simplification (of inter- & intra-governmental organizations, e.g. UN / G20) Equivalence Single Market EEA (31) Climate Change Privacy Provisions Access (30) EU EFTA Standards, Derivatives (28) CH Passporting Tax Evasion (4) Taxonomies Market UK EURO G20 (19) EU Regulations Bilateral Financial Market (20 + EU) AML vs Directives Agreements Stability

Goals Solutions Aligned Solutions

17 Beate Born The Concept of Passporting – only possible within the EEA (1)

Passports can be granted by an EEA NCA to an EEA Firm • In Financial Services, the passport gives banks in the EU the right to provide financial services throughout EEA 3rd Countries (non-EAA) the EU.

Provides Provides American German Bank Services without Spanish Market Services with cross • Passporting rights are mutual agreements between restrictions border restrictions all the Member States of a single market, based on Italian Market CANNOT grant EU Passport • a set of prudential requirements harmonized under Grants Passport EU law; and mutual recognition of licenses French Market Passporting is only possible within the EEA, which German NCA American NCA • Etc. (BaFin) (SEC) means an EEA NCA can grant access only to EEA firms • is only possible within the EEA, which means an EEA Passports cannot be granted by an EEA NCA to access a non-EEA market NCA cannot grant a passport to access a 3rd country single market EEA 3rd Countries (non-EAA) • does not apply to G20 and EFTA only states Provides American American German Bank • A passport license is granted by the home country Services with Market Provides Bank NCA and is under the home country supervision Cross Border Services restrictions without cross CANNOT grant EU border Grants access • Passporting rights cannot be granted to a firm that to American Passport rd restrictions Market is domiciled in a 3 country.

German NCA American • Passports cannot be granted by an EEA NCA to (BaFin) NCA (SEC) access a non-EEA market

Beate Born Applicability of EU Passporting - Overview

Passporting Applicability

EEA (31) (30)

EU (28) EFTA (4) CH EURO UK (19)

G20 (20+EU)

The concept of passporting is applicable to EEA and EU states. This does not apply to EFTA only and G20 only states.

Beate Born The Concept of Passporting – Branches vs Subsidiaries within the EEA (1)

Branches and Subsidiaries in the EEA

• Subsidiaries are seen as independent legal Spanish Firm entities, even within the EU. They are supervised Provides Passport by the host country authorities • Subsidiaries operate under the supervision of Spain Spain NO Passport Required Spanish NCA the “host” country directly and do not need to be granted a passport Provides Passport

• Branches are (generally) seen as an extension or the mother entity and operate under mother Spanish Spanish Branch Subsidiary NCA rules. Provides Services unrestricted under Provides Services • Branches operate under the passport of the host country supervision unrestricted mother entity Countries Other EEA EEA Other EEA Markets EEA Markets

Subsidiaries are seen as independent legal entities, even within the EU. They are supervised by the host country authorities. Branches are (generally) seen as an extension or the mother entity and operate under mother NCA rules.

Beate Born Passporting into and out of the UK - Putting Brexit into Perspective

Outbound (5500 passports utilized) UK Other EEA • The FCA has granted passports to about 5.5k UK 3 2 Provides Spanish Market UK Bank banks to access other European services without markets restrictions Italian Market Grants Passports for various • EEA NCAs have granted services German Market passports to about 8k non-UK EEA firms to the UK market 1 Etc. UK NCA (FCA) • Passports are granted for a variety of different services, such as investment banking, Inbound (8000 passports utilized) corporate lending, insurance, payments, asset mgmt etc. UK Other EEA • After Brexit, these passports will no longer be valid 2 3 Provide Spanish Bank German Bank Italian Bank UK Market services without restrictions Grant Passports for various services

1 Banco de BaFin Espana Banca d‘Italia EEA NCAs

Beate Born Section 2d

Equivalence – an Attempt to Reduce Complexity

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Main Points of Section 2d

Equivalence – an Attempt to Reduce Complexity

Equivalence.. • … only applicable to non-EEA countries • … does not grant single market access • … never applies to full regulations • … granted by the EU commission to a country • … can be revoked • … not a blanket solution for the UK after Brexit

23 Beate Born

Segregation in Unification – the Challenge of Complexity

Common Understanding Dispersion of National Alignment of Approaches of the Goal Approaches (partial)

Decisions / Agreements National Implementation Simplification (of inter- & intra-governmental organizations, e.g. UN / G20) Equivalence Single Market EEA (31) Climate Change Privacy Provisions Access (30) EU EFTA Standards, Derivatives (28) CH Passporting Tax Evasion (4) Taxonomies Market UK EURO G20 (19) EU Regulations Bilateral Financial Market (20 + EU) AML vs Directives Agreements Stability

Goals Solutions Aligned Solutions

Beate Born Aligned Goals don't mean aligned Rules – Challenge of Complexity

Equivalence Applicability

EEA (31) (30) Other EU (28) EFTA (4) CH EURO UK (19)

G20 (20+EU)

The concept of Equivalence can only be applicable to states outside of the EEA or EU.

Beate Born Section 3 Brexit Impacts on Financial Services and Brexit Implications at UBS

Beate Born Main Points of Section 3

Brexit Impacts on Financial Services and Brexit Implications at UBS

Brexit... • … lacking clarity • … banks are preparing for the worst case • … Equivalence will only partially help

Brexit and UBS… • … UBS Ltd will be dissolved in the course of a cross border merger into a Germany entity • … we are preparing for the worst case – no deal • … surprising complexity or business as usual?

27 Beate Born

Segregation in Unification – the Challenge of Complexity

Common Understanding Dispersion of National Alignment of Approaches of the Goal Approaches (partial)

Decisions / Agreements National Implementation Simplification (of inter- & intra-governmental organizations, e.g. UN / G20) Equivalence Single Market EEA (31) Climate Change Privacy Provisions Access (30) EU EFTA Standards, Derivatives (28) CH Passporting Tax Evasion (4) Taxonomies Market UK EURO G20 (19) EU Regulations Bilateral Financial Market (20 + EU) AML vs Directives Agreements Stability

Goals Solutions Aligned Solutions

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Brexit and Financial Services – What do we actually know?

Pre-Brexit After Brexit

• The UK is part of the EU • The UK is not part of the EU • The UK has access to the single European financial • The UK is not able to access the single European market Financial Market • UK firms have access to passports • Non-UK firms cannot service UK clients and vice versa • The UK has a well established domestic financial • Non-EEA firms cannot utilize their UK entities as a hub for market access into the single European market • Many non-EEA firms set up subsidiaries in the • The FCA will continue to apply current EEA rules (e.g. UK to access the European market MiFIDII / EMIR etc.) • ESMA, ECB is not the UK's authority any longer • The FCA sets rules for UK financial firms • FCA approved service providers will not be EEA approved anymore • Regulatory reporting is changing

In the case of a no-deal Brexit many aspects will still be unclear. The regulators have communicated that there will be no leeway concerning regulatory requirements.

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Brexit and Financial Services – What don't we know?

In case of a no-deal Brexit, firms will have little to no time to react, which makes it increasingly difficult to take any action at all, especially where the way forward is ambiguous. Timing • Will there be a transition period? • What happens if there is in fact a hard Brexit?

Deal • What exactly is part of the proposed Deal? • What will be negotiated?

Regulations • What happens to the current regulatory requirements? For example: • Will there be equivalence of UK exchanges? What does that mean for the Trading Obligation requirement under MifIDII? • When and how is Transaction Reporting (EMIR delegated reporting / MiFIDII transaction reporting) to be amended? • Can we still rely on UK firms to publish under the Pre-& Post trade transparency requirements under MiIFDII? • Can UK FCA approved APAs and ARMs still be used after Brexit? • When will we have to use the FIRDs FCA data base by? • Will the NCIs of UK citizens change?

Due to the ambiguity, many firms have already moved operations out of the UK, or are in the process of doing so.

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Options for the UK after Brexit

Options after Brexit

• Work through subsidiaries • Enter into International Agreements: Bilateral or multilateral Mutual commitments of 2 or more jurisdictions • Apply for Exemptions: • Japan or CH focus on selected aspects of cross-border activity of foreign firms to grant specific exemptions, e.g. the Memorandum of understanding between Bafin and Finma for UBS clients only • Apply for equivalence where possible • Set up sectoral agreements for financial services with the EU Commission (Switzerland is also attempting this)

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management UBS and Brexit: a Merger and Regulatory Implementation

In preparation of Brexit: Cross Border Merger (CBM)

• UBS Limited (UBSL) will transfer mainly EEA (non-UK) business to UBS's German incorporated subsidiary UBS What? Europe SE (UBS ESE) • UBS Limited will be resolved, but UBS AG London Branch will continue to serve the UK market • UBS ESE has so far served as UBS's primary regional hub for our EEA wealth management business as well as housing certain investment bank and business activities. • Following the Merger, UBS ESE will also become UBS's regional hub for EEA investment bank business and will continue its existing wealth management and asset management activities • UBS ESE is currently supervised by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) but is expected to be regulated by the European (the ECB) after the merger.

To ensure that UBS can continue to service existing investment bank customers, and continue to provide Why? services, in certain EU jurisdictions after Brexit.

th When? One month before Brexit, which is currently planned for 29 of March 2019.

The transfer will be carried out by means of a combined banking business transfer under Part VII of the UK How? Financial Services and Markets Act and a cross-border merger under the European Cross Border Mergers Directive. 32 Beate Born UBS and Brexit: A surprising level of complexity ? (1)

The Surprise effect • The Brexit project started out as an Investment Banking Project (lift and shift) • It was later segregated in Investment Banking, Wealth Management and Assent Management responsibilities • Challenges around budgeting, resourcing and governance surfaced • Brexit / the merger impacts run through the entire organization, assigning the somewhat ambiguous responsibilities ins an ongoing task

The Silo Effect • All other projects operating on "status quo" • All functions operating on "status quo" • Consequently, impacts were identified at a late stage – through "voluntary analysis"

33 Beate Born UBS and Brexit: A surprising level of complexity? (2)

The Ripple effect – example trading landscape

• With UBS Ltd. ceasing to exist, a considerable level of execution capabilities are shifted to either UBS AG London Branch or UBS ESE, • Consequently, trade flows changed • Consequently regulatory requirements changed • Principal vs Agent • EMIR • MiFIDII • Etc. • Consequently, decisions on operating models, trading capacities, booking models, product offering and implementation work had to be taken

34 Beate Born UBS and Brexit: A surprising level of complexity? (3)

AG entities Non-Europe CH Entities UK/ JE AG entities in APAC WM Europe SE Branches SE entities

UBS AG UBS UK JER SG HK TW CN GE LUX IT ES FR MON OTHERS Switzerland AG Entities

Equity (EQ) Fixed Income (FI) Structured Products (SP) Non Securitized Derivatives Funds

EQ not FI New FI Not Primary- SP not FI PE/ Funds/ EQ IPO EQ Listed listed- Issues FI Listed listed- SP Listed Equity FX/PM ETD ETFs OTC listed (IRD/CDS(Others) Mutual Funds OTC IPO OTC Products Products

Impacted Flow Swiss Hub Flow Direct Flow to Ltd

UBS CH 3rd 3rd 1 UBS AG UBS AG UBS ESE 4 UBS AG UBS AG UBS ESE AG Party Party

UBS CH 3rd

Flows 3rd 2 UBS ESE UBS AG UBS ESE 5 UBS ESE UBS AG UBS ESE AG Party Party

UBS CH 3rd 3 Rest UBS AG UBS ESE AG Party Not allowed Not in scope of the GWM Brexit Allowed Legend: Trading Project Allowed with restrictions 35 Beate Born UBS and Brexit: What does it mean for Operational Risk?

• UBSL operational carve out will take place in Oct. 2018 (UBSL functions and clients will be split between AGLB Timeline and UBS ESE)* • UBSL will be dissolved in March 1, 2019* • Brexit will come into effect in April 2019

Target • All trades originating in WM entities currently executed /routed through UBSL will in either be routed to AGL or Solution UBS ESE • UBSL clients are divided between AGL and UBS ESE • UBS ESE will in the future have WM and IB divisions under one roof

Additional within UBS ESE (formerly Borsa Italiana only) Regulatory • Exchange Memberships Intra-entity trade flow within UBS ESE and AGL (formerly Triggers • • UBS ESE is SI for all asset classes (formerly FX only) • ETD positions are migrated to UBS ESE or AGL (formerly UBSL only)

Regulatory • Joint requirements between IB and WM divisions resulting in exchange of CID (TXR) and publication of joint Impacts reports (BEX) • Re-structuring of the clearing set up for all locations • Data Provision to trading venues (including CID) for various locations • Principal and Agent Capacity trading changes • Best Execution flow is to be revisited

36 Beate Born Additional Info BREXIT GWM Trading Stream Project Setup

BREXIT GROUP SC / GWM EC

GROUP BREXIT PROGRAM BREXIT GWM TRADING SC

BREXIT GWM TRADING STREAM BEATE BORN

ETD SECURITIZED TREASURY STRUCTURED PRODUCTS LOCATIONS PRIMARY PRODUCTS PRODUCTS BCCH

PMOI     GER

TRADE FLOWS     ESP

IPS PRINCIPAL VS AGENT     ITA

REGULATORY EMIR (INCL ETD CLEARING)     LUX

REGULATORY TXR     FRA REGULATORY BEX     MCO

TRADING-RELATED COST & CHARGES     GBR COO COO U K: REGULATORY VARIOUS MIFID II + NON-MIFID II     JEY

BUSINESS DESIGN     APAC OPERATIONAL READINESS / CONTRACTS & AGREEMENTS    

37 Beate Born Additional Info BREXIT GWM Trading: Stream Impact

Level of impact across the various streams and locations

BREXIT WM Trading BCCH GER HKSG UK JEY FRA MCO LUX ITA ESP Stream Impact

Trading ETD H H H No No No H H H No

Trading Securitized Prod. H H H H L-M H No M L H

Principal vs Agent TBD L-M L-M H L-M No No L-M M M

Regulatory EMIR M M No No No L M M M No

Regulatory TXR L H No M TBD No No H H H

Regulatory BEX L-M M No M No No No M M M

Regulatory various MiFID II No M No M No L No M M M

Regulatory Non-MiFID II L No L L L No No L No No

Contracts and Agreements TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

1WMP H High impact L Low impact 38 M Medium impact No No impact Beate Born Section 4 Sustainability – the next Level of Complexity (in Culture and Regulation)

Beate Born Main Points of Section 4

Sustainability – the next Level of Complexity (in Regulation)

2030 UN Sustainability Agenda ... • … 17 Sustainability Development Goals by 2030 • … no common reporting • … no agreed taxonomy

Financial Services and Sustainability… • … Financial Market as a gatekeeper for sustainable investments • … implementation through regulation • … complexity and ambiguity

40 Beate Born Segregation in Unification – the Challenge of Complexity

Common Understanding Dispersion of National Alignment of Approaches of the Goal Approaches (partial)

Decisions / Agreements National Implementation Simplification (of inter- & intra-governmental organizations, e.g. UN / G20) Equivalence Single Market EEA (31) Climate Change Privacy Provisions Access (30) EU EFTA Standards, Derivatives (28) CH Passporting Tax Evasion (4) Taxonomies Market UK EURO G20 (19) EU Regulations Bilateral Financial Market (20 + EU) AML vs Directives Agreements Stability

Goals Solutions Aligned Solutions

41 Beate Born Sustainability - Recent Developments

Sustainability – where are we at? • 2015: In the course of the 2030 UN Sustainability Agenda 193 UN Member States endorsed 17 Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs), • 2015: in the course of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 195 Nations signed the Paris Agreement • 2018: Action Plan for Financing Sustainable Growth published by the EU Commission • For example: The EU (Commission) has committed to specific transport, water & waste and energy goals requiring a 270bn Euro Investment by 2013

Large estimated financial need • Estimated needs lay between USD 2 and 7 trillion annually • USD 150-160 billion currently available

 consequently, private investments are to fill at least part of the gap

42 Beate Born Sustainability – what do we mean by that?

17 Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs)

Environmental • Pollution and Waster (Goals: 14 /15 /12) • Climate Change (Goals: 7/13) • Water (Goals: 6/14)

Social • People (Goals: 3/5/8) e.g. 40 mio people in modern slavery • Products and Services (Goals: 1/2/3/4/7/12/14) e.g. supply chain mgmt

Governance • Governance (Goal: 16) e.g. accountability, fairness, transparency with stakeholders • Ethics (Goals: 8/9/10/16/17)

43 Beate Born 17 Sustainability Goals – Only 3 are Purely Environmental

The 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) to transform our world: GOAL 1: No Poverty GOAL 2: Zero Hunger GOAL 3: Good Health and Well-being GOAL 4: Quality Education GOAL 5: Gender Equality GOAL 6: Clean Water and Sanitation GOAL 7: Affordable and Clean Energy GOAL 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth GOAL 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure GOAL 10: Reduced Inequality GOAL 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities GOAL 12: Responsible Consumption and Production GOAL 13: Climate Action GOAL 14: Life Below Water GOAL 15: Life on Land GOAL 16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions GOAL 17: Partnerships to achieve the Goal 44 Beate Born Sustainability and Financial Services – a large Responsibility to carry

The EU Commission is looking to the Financial Services Sector to facilitate Sustainable Development: • "The financial sector has huge potential for green investments. The financial sector must be part of the solution and can play a critical role in achieving the EU’s sustainability goals. […] engaging private finance in a systematic way requires systemic changes to the EU financial eco-system.

45 Beate Born Sustainability and Financial Services

Sustainability Financial Regulations • The financial services industry is expected to channel funds towards sustainable investments through the evaluation of investments and companies • The EU Commission has established a High Level Expert Group, and a Technical Expert Group to figure out how to • Steer flow of public and private capital towards sustainable investments • Develop a unified classification system for sustainable economic activities

May 2018: Three proposals for Regulations (of the European Parliament and the Council) • Benchmarking, MiFIDII are to be amended • A taxonomy framework is to be implemented

46 Beate Born Sustainability and Financial Services - Challenges

The EU and global communities are still struggling with the following: • A globally and across industries accepted definition of sustainability and its conceptual goals in line with the 17 SDGs • A globally or at least EEA-wide accepted and comprehensive taxonomy for evaluating sustainability of investment products and their underlying businesses • An infrastructure to capture investment product sustainability data and make it available to the financial services industry (preferably globally but within Europe as a minimum) • A globally or at least EEA-wide accepted standard to sustainability reporting in the private and public sector (voluntary and involuntary) that the financial categorization can be based on • A commonly accepted set of prioritization guidelines between investor protection, and sustainability factors (globally or at least Europe-wide)

Furthermore: • Sustainability is often only focused around SDGs 13-15, which are the ones relating purely to environmental topics. • European Commission itself states that • the taxonomy laid out in the “Proposal for Regulation […] on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment [..] is not yet in a stable and mature state” , • the necessity for standardization around this topic runs deeper into the reporting chain where many stakeholders struggle with misinterpretation and information gaps. 47 Beate Born UBS and Sustainability

UBS has been actively pushing private investments towards sustainable investment solutions • Three main challenges were identified: • Awareness – do our clients understand the sense of urgency? • Simplification – do our clients understand the content? • Contribution - do our clients understand the investment options? • Further points to consider • Sustainability Identity and Culture: Has to affect the entire organization • Partnerships with other Firms, Governments, Intra-Governmental organizations

Investment Solutions & Definitions • Exclusion – avoid investing in unsustainable corporates and countries • Integration - Invest in sustainable corporates and countries • Impact – Seek to have direct, positive impact on society and the environment PLUS financial returns • Philanthropy – Impact but willing to sacrifice returns

48 Beate Born Section 5

Complexities of Regulatory Implementation in the Firm

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Main Points of Section 5

Complexities of Regulatory Implementation in the Firm

Complexity in Regulatory Implementation… • Internal vs. • External

Opposite Forces in Regulations… • Privacy vs. • Transparency

Execution and regulatory complexity… • …Example: complexity of MifIDII Data Flow

50 Beate Born Complexity in Regulatory Implementation in Financial Services

Regulatory Complexity Internal Complexity

Amount of Information Systems • Increasing number of regulations on a • Multiple IT platforms global scale • Multiple legacy systems Interpretation • Multiple booking centers and advisory • Individual interpretation of how to offices achieve a regulatory goal in every Trade Flows & Products jurisdiction • Multiple CCPs, Exchange • Conflicts between rules and definitions Memberships, Broker Relationships in different jurisdiction Ever Rising Regulatory • International trading set up Global Community Implementation Costs • International client base with cross • Equivalence provisions are hard to border business manage and to anticipate • Extensive, individualized product shelf • Cross Border provisions depending on Processes the access to the single market place • Slow knowledge transfer, cumbersome • Changes to old regulations and process mgmt. creation of new regulations are • Lacking standardization for regulatory accelerating implementation Market Infrastructure Organization • Market infrastructure cannot keep up • Hard hierarchies & paralyzing politics with the pace that new regulations are • Cost pressures preventing quick / agile implemented at approaches • Complex legal entity structures

51

Beate Born Opposing Forces within different Regulations: Privacy vs Transparency

Privacy Data Transparency

• With the increasing digital • Data is a commodity • Regulators collect client & Market connectedness and extension of • Companies that have client information to prevent Market the digital footprint, privacy has data (Google / Amazon / Abuse, Money Laundry, Tax Evasion become a major concern for Alibaba) also have power and Market Instability consumers. • Data can be used to • All trading activity is to be on • Companies are now held manipulate and pressure, record (limited OTC trading) in responsible to protect their but also to protect the client order to understand market trends, clients‘ data and make it activities and prevent potential transparent what they are using it • Structuring Big Data is a major crashes. for. business model together with Robotics, AI etc. • Trading information available to • Client data must be the financial market participants is anonymized and/or destroyed if to make the market place fair. not needed any longer (for the  From Know Your Customer purpose it was collected for). to Know Your Data • Prices, costs & commissions are to be made transparent by the bank. • Banks continue to be discrete about their clients‘ information. • Banks can only sell products to

clients according to their level of • GDPR / Client Payments Directive II sophistication 52 Beate Born Illustration - Example Trade Life Cycle – Step 1 – Internal Order & Execution Flow

PRE-TRADE TRADE POST-TRADE

End Client

COMPANY WEBSITE TRADE CONFIRMATION (ACCESSIBLE TO CLIENT)

End client Order

Investment Firm

Order ORDER PROCESSING TRADE MGMT & BEX ORDER ENTRY CHANNELS SYSTEMS SETTLEMENT BENCHMARKING Record Keeping RULE ENGINES: NOK =Block IMMUTABLE STORAGE PRODUCT SUITABILITY CLIENT SUITABILITY OK = execute Execution

Market Infrastructure TRADING VENUES ARM NCA EXCHANGE/VENUES (REGULATED MARKET, MTF, OTF) Order ESMA 3RD PARTY BROKERS/OTC

SYSTEMATIC INTERNALIZERS

Market Data APA (MARKET) APA (MARKET) MARKET DATA SOURCES BENCHMARKING PROVIDERS GLEIF (SIX, ETC.) EQ: LIQUID METRIX

ANNA FX: BESTX Externa Data Provider Flow VENDORS FI: MARKETAXESS Internal Process flow BENCHMARKING SP: SUPERDERIVATIVES Infrastructure Reporting flow Order & Execution & Completion BEX 53 Client Reporting Clearing Flow Illustration - Example Trade Life Cycle – Step 2 – Market Infrastructure Flow

PRE-TRADE TRADE POST-TRADE

End Client

COMPANY WEBSITE TRADE CONFIRMATION (ACCESSIBLE TO CLIENT)

End client Order

Investment Firm

Order ORDER PROCESSING TRADE MGMT & BEX ORDER ENTRY CHANNELS SYSTEMS SETTLEMENT BENCHMARKING Record Keeping IMMUTABLE STORAGE RULE ENGINES: Transaction NOK =Block End client Info PRODUCT SUITABILITY Reporting (t+1) CLIENT SUITABILITY OK = execute Execution

Market Infrastructure TXR TRADING VENUES ARM NCA

Pre-trade information EXCHANGE/VENUES Post Trade ToTV (REGULATED MARKET, MTF, OTF) Order information (real time) ESMA 3RD PARTY BROKERS/OTC Pre-trade information

SYSTEMATIC INTERNALIZERS

Post Trade Market Data APA (MARKET) information APA (MARKET) MARKET DATA SOURCES BENCHMARKING PROVIDERS GLEIF (SIX, ETC.) EQ: LIQUID METRIX

ANNA FX: BESTX Externa Data Provider Flow VENDORS FI: MARKETAXESS Internal Process flow BENCHMARKING SP: SUPERDERIVATIVES Infrastructure Reporting flow Order & Execution & Completion BEX 54 Client Reporting Clearing Flow Illustration - Example Trade Life Cycle – Step 3 – External Data Provider Flow

PRE-TRADE TRADE POST-TRADE

End Client

COMPANY WEBSITE TRADE CONFIRMATION (ACCESSIBLE TO CLIENT)

End client Order

Investment Firm

Order ORDER PROCESSING TRADE MGMT & BEX ORDER ENTRY CHANNELS SYSTEMS SETTLEMENT BENCHMARKING Record Keeping IMMUTABLE STORAGE RULE ENGINES: Transaction NOK =Block End client Info PRODUCT SUITABILITY Reporting (t+1) CLIENT SUITABILITY OK = execute Execution

Market Infrastructure TXR TRADING VENUES ARM NCA

Pre-trade information EXCHANGE/VENUES Post Trade ToTV (REGULATED MARKET, MTF, OTF) Order information (real time) ESMA 3RD PARTY BROKERS/OTC Pre-trade information

SYSTEMATIC INTERNALIZERS

Post Trade Market Data APA (MARKET) information APA (MARKET) MARKET DATA SOURCES BENCHMARKING PROVIDERS GLEIF (SIX, ETC.) EQ: LIQUID METRIX

ANNA FX: BESTX ISINs / LEIs /ToTV / Externa Data Provider Flow VENDORS FI: MARKETAXESS Benchmarking /Venue status / Internal Process flow BENCHMARKING Instrument Data SP: SUPERDERIVATIVES Infrastructure Reporting flow Order & Execution & Completion BEX 55 Client Reporting Clearing Flow Illustration - Trade Life Cycle – Step 4 – BEX Flow Example

PRE-TRADE TRADE POST-TRADE

End Client

COMPANY WEBSITE TRADE CONFIRMATION (ACCESSIBLE TO CLIENT)

End client Top 5 venue report (BEX) Order Cost & Confirms Quality of Execution report (BEX) Investment Firm (BEX)

Order ORDER PROCESSING TRADE MGMT & BEX ORDER ENTRY CHANNELS EXECUTION KPCS SYSTEMS SETTLEMENT BENCHMARKING Record Keeping Record Keeping RULE ENGINES: NOK =Block IMMUTABLE STORAGE PRODUCT SUITABILITY End client Info Transaction CLIENT SUITABILITY OK = execute Execution Reporting (t+1) Market Infrastructure TXR TRADING VENUES / IB ARM NCA

Pre-trade information EXCHANGE/VENUES Post Trade ToTV (REGULATED MARKET, MTF, OTF) Order information (real time) ESMA 3RD PARTY BROKERS/OTC Pre-trade information

SYSTEMATIC INTERNALIZERS CCP FOR ETD

Post Trade Market Data APA (MARKET) information APA (MARKET) MARKET DATA SOURCES BENCHMARKING PROVIDERS GLEIF (SIX, ETC.) EQ: LIQUID METRIX

ANNA FX: BESTX ISINs / LEIs /ToTV / Externa Data Provider Flow VENDORS FI: MARKETAXESS Benchmarking /Venue status / Internal Process flow BENCHMARKING Instrument Data SP: SUPERDERIVATIVES Infrastructure Reporting flow Order & Execution & Completion BEX 56 Client Reporting Clearing Flow Illustration - Trade Life Cycle – Step 6 – Clearing Flow Example

PRE-TRADE TRADE POST-TRADE

End Client

COMPANY WEBSITE TRADE CONFIRMATION (ACCESSIBLE TO CLIENT)

End client Top 5 venue report (BEX) Order Cost & Confirms Quality of Execution report (BEX) (BEX) Investment Firm NOSA / GOSA ACCOUNTS Order ORDER PROCESSING TRADE MGMT & BEX ORDER ENTRY CHANNELS EXECUTION KPCS SYSTEMS SETTLEMENT BENCHMARKING Record Keeping Record Keeping RULE ENGINES: NOK =Block IMMUTABLE STORAGE PRODUCT SUITABILITY End client Info Transaction CLIENT SUITABILITY OK = execute Execution Reporting (t+1) Market Infrastructure TXR TRADING VENUES / IB ARM NCA

Pre-trade information EXCHANGE/VENUES Post Trade ToTV (REGULATED MARKET, MTF, OTF) Order information (real time) ESMA 3RD PARTY BROKERS/OTC Pre-trade information

SYSTEMATIC INTERNALIZERS CCP FOR ETD

Post Trade Market Data APA (MARKET) information APA (MARKET) MARKET DATA SOURCES BENCHMARKING PROVIDERS GLEIF (SIX, ETC.) EQ: LIQUID METRIX

ANNA FX: BESTX ISINs / LEIs /ToTV / Externa Data Provider Flow VENDORS FI: MARKETAXESS Benchmarking /Venue status / Internal Process flow BENCHMARKING Instrument Data SP: SUPERDERIVATIVES Infrastructure Reporting flow Order & Execution & Completion BEX 57 Client Reporting Clearing Flow Illustration - Example Trade Life Cycle - Overview

PRE-TRADE TRADE POST-TRADE

End Client

COMPANY WEBSITE TRADE CONFIRMATION (ACCESSIBLE TO CLIENT) End client Top 5 venue report (BEX) Order Cost & Confirms Quality of Execution report (BEX) (BEX) Investment Firm NOSA / GOSA ACCOUNTS Order ORDER PROCESSING TRADE MGMT & BEX ORDER ENTRY CHANNELS EXECUTION KPCS SYSTEMS SETTLEMENT BENCHMARKING Record Keeping IMMUTABLE STORAGE RULE ENGINES: Transaction NOK =Block End client Info PRODUCT SUITABILITY Reporting (t+1) CLIENT SUITABILITY OK = execute Execution

Market Infrastructure TXR TRADING VENUES ARM NCA

Pre-trade information EXCHANGE/VENUES Post Trade ToTV (REGULATED MARKET, MTF, OTF) Order information (real time) ESMA 3RD PARTY BROKERS/OTC Pre-trade information

SYSTEMATIC INTERNALIZERS CCP FOR ETD

Post Trade Market Data APA (MARKET) information APA (MARKET) MARKET DATA SOURCES BENCHMARKING PROVIDERS GLEIF (SIX, ETC.) EQ: LIQUID METRIX

ANNA FX: BESTX ISINs / LEIs /ToTV / Externa Data Provider Flow VENDORS FI: MARKETAXESS Benchmarking /Venue status / Internal Process flow BENCHMARKING Instrument Data SP: SUPERDERIVATIVES Infrastructure Reporting flow Order & Execution & Completion BEX 58 Client Reporting Clearing Flow Illustration - Example MiFID II / MiFIR Requirements in the Trade Life Cycle

PRE-TRADE TRADE POST-TRADE

Client Trade End Client BEX Reporting NOSA / GOSA account Confirmation quarterly set up for cleared T+1 COMPANY WEBSITE ETDs TRADE CONFIRMATION (ACCESSIBLE TO CLIENT) End client BEX Order Trading Venue Clock Synch Benchmarking Regime Requirements Investment Firm NOSA / GOSA Top 5 venue report Record ACCOUNTS Quality of Execution report Keeping for 5- Order ORDER PROCESSING TRADE MGMT & BEX 10 years Reporting ORDER ENTRY CHANNELS Art 26(5) SYSTEMS SETTLEMENT BENCHMARKING Applicability Reporting Trading Obligation Record Keeping IMMUTABLE STORAGE RULE ENGINES: Transaction NOK =Block End client Info Transaction PRODUCT SUITABILITY Reporting (t+1) CLIENT SUITABILITY OK = execute Execution Reporting T-1 Market Infrastructure TXR TRADING VENUES ARM NCA

Pre-trade information EXCHANGE/VENUES Post Trade ToTV (REGULATED MARKET, MTF, OTF) Order information (real time) ESMA 3RD PARTY BROKERS/OTC Pre-trade information Transparency SYSTEMATIC INTERNALIZERS CCP FOR ETD Reporting Real

Time Post Trade Market Data APA (MARKET) information APA (MARKET) MARKET DATA SOURCES BENCHMARKING PROVIDERS GLEIF (SIX, ETC.) EQ: LIQUID METRIX

ANNA FX: BESTX ISINs / LEIs /ToTV / Externa Data Provider Flow VENDORS FI: MARKETAXESS Benchmarking /Venue status / Internal Process flow BENCHMARKING Instrument Data SP: SUPERDERIVATIVES Infrastructure Reporting flow Order & Execution & Completion BEX 59 Client Reporting Clearing Flow Section 6

Technology: How Fintech & RegTech change our processes, platforms and data management

Beate Born – UBS Wealth Management Main Points of Section 6

Technology: How Fintech & RegTech change our Processes, Platforms and Data Management

Technological advancement – don't miss the boat • Banks will not be able to keep all development in house – let the experts to the job • Technologies should be utilized - Robotics, AI, Big Data, Cloud Computing • We need lean and flexible machines to implement regulatory requirements for us (Rule engines for products, for clients, for flows, for legal entities)

Expect Regulations around technology • There are a lot of concerns about machine learning and AI – regulations are to come

Focus on your main markets, products and clients • Reducing complexity might also mean reducing the offering, the client scope and geographical coverage • Simplification of the business means saving IT costs

Sell what you do best • Firms will want to sell tech solutions that they have built inhouse to their competitors

61 Beate Born Regulatory Change permeates throughout the organization in impact & implementation

Environmental Run the Spheres of Change and bank Spheres where no Run the bank change initiated interactions – home of change projects Governmant Affairsal

Front Office Products & Investments

Core IT System Legal & Human Compliance Ressources Regulatory Change

Operations

Finance / Operations IT and Operations layers Accounting Run the bank functions that have to contributed Core of the Operational knowledge to the and IT structure of the Regulatory change financial services institution 62

Beate Born Operational Risk Regulatory Change creates the need for resources all throughout the organization

Front office communicates to the client, Environmental Run repapers,the changes processes, adheres to Spheres of Change and Governmental Affairs bank Spheres wherepolicies, no spends time on trainings and makes Run the bank client data available communicates to the regulator change initiated and engages in lobbying interactions – home of change projects

Governmant Affairsal Products and investments analysis products, verifies definitions, supports data flow, Legal and compliance Products & changes order mgmt. systems signs off on assessments Front Office Investments and interpretations & clarifies legal text IT and Operations have the largest costs when it comes to regulatory implementation Core IT System Human Resources makes Legal & Human data available to the Compliance Compliance Ressources regulator IT and Operations have ensure the reg Regulatory Changethe largest costs when it change is comes to regulatory reflected in all implementation Senior policies and Operations Executives controls Senior Level forms multiple Operations committees to control Finance / budgets, make risk decisions IT and Operations layers Accounting Run the bank functions that have to contributed Operations changes processes, supports impact Core of the Operational knowledge to the assessment with expert knowledge, analyses and IT structure of the Regulatory changerun the bank tasks manages relationship to Operational Risk runs the financial services vendors change the bank business team instituten responsible for Reg change 63

Beate Born Operational Risk Complexity and Increased RegChange Speed and Sophistication

Main goals that RegTech should accomplish from a bank’s perspective • Reduce complexity and therefore decrease the cost of risk & compliance operations and regulatory implementation • Create opportunities for revenue creation in operational risk & regulatory compliance

Increased pace of Change • The change in regulations will happen with increasing speed • Regulators will expect shigh data and technology standards that are flexibly adaptable

high Legal high Data Entity Multiple Ad hoc Storage Structure system changes changes IT Implem Orga- Product Plattfor entatio ms Lack of Errors nizational Shelf cultural n gaps structure adaptation Know- Trade Expensive legde Flows External remediati Silos help on Change organization SpeedReg of Complexity Complexity of the

high high Cost of Change Implementation Cost of Change Implementation With every Regulatory Project, change is a necessity and the harder it is to define the status quo, the harder it will be to 64 Beate Born plan and implement the change.

Improvements for straightforward Regulatory Change – The "old" Concept of Industrialization

Old Process

Reg Change Regulator Project team Run the bank Run the bank Reg Change IT Stakeholders Operations / IT / Operations maintenance

External Costs / Costs Resources

Project team Run the bank Ops / IT Reg Change IT Reg Change Regulator Stakeholders / Operations Mainentance

New process Cost Reduction

Platforms & Connectivity: Analysis: • All systems are on a single platform • The project team is internal, globally responsible and knowledgeable • All systems & applications exchange information using the same • All processes are documented and readily available for use (Artificial language (Cloud, big data etc.) Intelligence/Robotics?) • Single change is replicated throughout the entire organization • A modeling tool for regulatory change is available (Digital Twin?) Modeling & Testing • Analysis in finalized by the project team • A modeling tool for regulatory change is available (Digital Twin?) Requirements: • Agile, flexible change is ongoing • Change impact fed into existing structures (trainings etc.) Structured Data • Requirements are standardized and fed into RegChange • All definitions are aligned (products, entity types, clients etc.) • All data captured in one database 65 Beate Born Technological & Operational Consideration for Banks: Service Offering: Business Model and Industrialization Implications

In the attempt to reduce costs and complexity we can tackle from two angles

Operations : Business Model: Technological advancement is a must in order to survive in the Focus on core competencies & target market future, for example: Remark for MiFID II: there is no way to get out of the entire regulation, but Standardization is necessary (industrialization) – you can de-scope on certain parts, e.g. – to become more efficient in data sourcing – only trade with venues (avoid TPY), – create transparency & simplify to reduce analysis & – don’t trade ETDs (avoid Clearing), implementation efforts – don’t trade on own account or match trades (avoid venue – consolidate platforms and legal entity structures requirements) – Share same systems across divisions – don’t have an exchange membership (avoid clock synch) – Build flexible but standardized processes Other ways to simplify – Focus on geographies: ensure to be able to service all clients in Asia Outsourcing of data mining capabilities is necessary – – ensure to be able to operate all entities in Asia – Focus on core competencies for banks – Focus on Products – data mining is expensive and is a service provided by many firms out there – E.g. discontinue ETDs if not main market and Clearing too expensive to implement – Build trust to vendors – Focus on client segments – new and growing link in the value chain – Professional Clients vs. retails or WM clients – Become a vendor – Institutional clients (delegated reporting offering?)

66 Beate Born Staying relevant in the global financial Markets

What does a bank need to stay relevant

• Meet customer expectations o Mobile, digital, easy access, fast execution o Product offering (large) o Price & value in execution (BEX) o Cross border business (anytime, anywhere) o State of the art advice (robo or human or both) o Stability (not in danger of bankruptcy) o Price and value in service provision (don't overcharge, individualized advice)

• Generate sufficient revenue to sustain size, reputation and talent (salaries) o Re-think revenue generators due to changing client attitudes and regulatory requirements

• Stay compliant with regulations o Offset income loss stemming from regulatory implementation, restrictions o Avoid fines (since 2008 regulatory fines have increased 45-fold)

• Cover costs of non-revenue-generators o Compliance, , Research, Program Management

67 Beate Born Thanks for listening!!

Any Questions??

Beate Born Contact information

UBS Switzerland AG GWM COO - Business Risk Services Europaallee 21, 8004 Zürich, Switzerland

+41 (0)79 910 8650 Beate.born@.com