DOCSLIB.ORG

New Hampshire Revised Sulfur Dioxide Page 3 Nonattainment Area Boundary Recommendation July 6, 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Hampshire Revised Sulfur Dioxide Page 3 Nonattainment Area Boundary Recommendation July 6, 2011 New Hampshire Revised Sulfur Dioxide Page 3 Nonattainment Area Boundary Recommendation July 6, 2011 FIGURE 1. Proposed Central New Hampshire 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area Pittburg New Hampshire Cl ar ks vi lle Atkinson & Gilmanton Academy Grant Stewartstown Dixs Second Grant Co lle ge Colebrook Gran t Di xv ille Wentworths Columbia Lo c at io n Ervings Location M ill sf ield Errol Od e ll Stra tford Dummer Cambridge Central New Hampshire Stark North Mi lan 1-Hour SO2 Nonattainment Area Umbe rland K ilk en n y Be r lin Lancaster Sucess Go r h am Dal ton Je ff er s on R an d ol ph Shelburne Wh ite fi eld SO2 Monitor Exceeding 1-Hour NAAQS Ma r tin s L oc . L itt le to n Low&Burbanks Gre en s Gr an t Gr a nt Ca rroll Be ans Pinkhams Mo n r o e Purchase Grant SO2 Monitor Meeting the 1-Hour NAAQS Lyman Bethlehe m Sargents Lisbon Purc hase Cr aw fo r d s Sugar Purchase Hil l Franconia Ba th Ja ck so n Bea ns Ch a tha m Gran t Landaff Easton Ha les H av erh ill Lincoln He b ron Location Benton Li ve rm o r e Conway Woodstock Piermont Albany Wa te rv ille Warren Valley Thornton Orfo r d Ells wo r th Madison Eaton Wentworth Tamworth Rumney Campton Sandwich Freedom Ly m e Dorchester Holde rne ss Groton Plymouth Effingham Moulton As hl and Hebron Hanover borough Ossipee Hebron Tuftonboro Enfield Bridge Ne w water Le b an o n Orange Ha mpto n Ale xa ndria Meredith Bris tol Enfield Wolfboro Wakefield Grafton Laconia Pl antfield Brook Gi lfo r d fie ld Da nbury H ill Sanbornton Gr an t ha m Springfield Alton Middle Corni sh Wil mot Tilton Belmont Ne w to w n Franklin Croydon Andove r Durham New G ilma n to n M ilt on London No rthfi eld C laremont Sunapee Newport Salibury Farmington Ba rns tead Sutton C anterbury Loudon Un ity Newbury Webster Pittsfield Rochester Goshen Strafford Wa rne r Sommersworth Charle s Bradf ord Concord to wn Ac worth Lempster Eps om Northwood Ba rringt on R ol lin g sf ord Hopkinton Do v er Langdon He nnik er Madbury Washington Pembroke Hillsborough A lle ns Marlow De erfi eld Bow town Nottingham A lst ea d Lee Du rham Newing Du nba rton ton Stoddard De ering Weare Hookset Ports Wal pole An t ri m Ca ndi a New mark et Ne w C as tle Gils u m Epping Green mouth Raymond New fi elds la n d Be nning Go ff st o wn Su lliv an Strat Surry ton Frances Auburn ham Ry e Ne lson Manchester Brent to wn Fremont Wood North West Hannock Ne w Ches ter Exeter Ha mpton Bos ton moreland Keene G r ee nl an d Ro x bury Ha mp Hampton Har r is vil le Bedford San Da n East Ke ns down Ki ngs Kings to n Mt . Vill e in g to n Lynde ton ton F all s Ma r l Du b lin Peter Ve rnon London Ch es te rfie ld borough Derry Ha m p st ea d Seabrook bo r o ug h borough Merrimack Derry South Sw anz ey Amherst Ne wton Ha mpto n Ja ff re y Wilt o n Litchfield Atkinson Hin s da le Troy Sharon Te m p le Mi lfo r d Windham Winchester Hudson Salem Ri chmound F it zw illi am Rindge Ne w Ho lli s B roo k lin e Na s hua Pe lham Ip s wic h Mason New Hampshire Revised Sulfur Dioxide Page 4 Nonattainment Area Boundary Recommendation July 6, 2011 ATTACHMENT A TECHNICAL ATTACHMENT Rationale for New Hampshire’s 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area Boundaries New Hampshire Revised Sulfur Dioxide Page A-1 Nonattainment Area Boundary Recommendation July 6, 2011 Rationale for New Hampshire’s 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area Boundaries The recommendations contained in this letter are fully compliant with Section 107(d)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) which defines a nonattainment area as any area that (1) does not meet a National Ambient Air Quality Standard (“NAAQS”), or (2) contributes to ambient NAAQS violations in a nearby area. The New Hampshire recommended nonattainment area boundaries fulfill these requirements and exercises the flexibility allowed in the guidance, including consideration of: existing air quality, emission patterns, prevailing meteorology, topography and terrain, and jurisdictional boundaries. To a limited degree, airflow trajectories were also considered. The starting point of attainment area boundary designations is the examination of existing monitoring data. Table A1 contains the most recent 4 years of quality assured monitoring data for 1-hour average SO2 in New Hampshire. The locations of these monitors are marked in Figure 1 (above) and Figure A1 (below). TABLE A1. Estimated 2007 – 2010 1-Hour SO2 Design Values by Monitor, in parts per billion (ppb) Location Monitor 2007 2008 2009 2010 2007- 2008- SO2 ID 98th 98th 98th 98th 2009 2010 NAAQS Percentile Percentile Percentile Percentile Design Design (ppb) Value Value Concord 33-013-1007 -- -- -- 46 -- 46 75 Manchester 33-011-0020 58 48 50 57 52.0 51.7 75 Pembroke 33-013-1006 165 141 222 217 176.0 193.3 75 Portsmouth 33-015-0014 59 62 42 45 54.3 49.7 75 State -- 165 141 222 217 176.0 193.3 75 Maximum All but one of the New Hampshire SO2 monitors indicate attainment of the new SO2 NAAQS. Monitors located in Manchester and Portsmouth have recent 3-year design values of about two- thirds the level of the new NAAQS. A monitor located in Concord does not have 3 years’ worth of data, or even a full single year of data, but the 98th percentile of the data that does exist suggests that the monitor is likely to also meet the level of the new NAAQS. Only the Pembroke monitor fails to meet the level of the new SO2 NAAQS. This monitor is located about 0.4 miles to the southeast of a coal-fired power plant and is strategically located to capture the power plant’s worst-case air pollution impacts. The power plant, Merrimack Station, is subject to a state air pollution law that requires the installation of a scrubber system for the reduction of mercury emissions and SO2 emissions (as part of a Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirement in the New Hampshire Regional Haze SIP). This scrubber system is under construction and is reportedly ahead of its construction schedule. Since the existing stacks for the station are relatively short, there is relatively poor dispersion of air pollutants. Part of the pollution control project includes New Hampshire Revised Sulfur Dioxide Page A-2 Nonattainment Area Boundary Recommendation July 6, 2011 FIGURE A1. Presumptive Norm – Merrimack County Boundary Pittburg New Hampshire Cl ar ks vi lle Atkinson & Gilmanton Academy Grant S te wa r ts to wn Dixs Second Grant Co lle ge Colebrook Gr an t Di xv ille Wentworths Columbia Lo c at io n E r vin g s Location M ill sf ield Errol Od e ll S tr a tfo r d Du mmer Ca mbridg e Stark North Mi lan Umbe rl and Kilkenny Be rlin SO2 Monitors (2008-2010) Lancaster Sucess Go r h am Dal ton Je ff er s on Randolph Shelburne Whitefield SO2 Monitor Exceeding 1-Hour NAAQS Martins Loc. L itt le to n Low&Burbanks Gr e en s Gr an t Gr a nt Ca rro ll Be ans Pinkhams Mo n r o e Purchase Grant SO2 Monitor Meeting the 1-Hour NAAQS Lyman Bethlehe m Sargents Lisbon Purchase Cr aw fo r d s Sugar Purchase Hil l Franconia Ba th Ja ck so n Bea ns Cha tha m Gr an t Landaff Easton Ha les Haverhill Lincoln He b ron Location Benton Li ve rm o r e Conwa y W oodstock Piermont Albany Wa te rv ille Warren Valley Thornton Or fo r d Ells wo r th Madison Eaton Went worth Ta m wo r th Rumney Campton Sa ndwich Fr e ed o m Ly m e Dorches ter Ho lde rne ss Groton Plymouth Effingham Moulton As hl and Hebron Hanover borough Ossipee Hebron Tuftonboro Enfield Bridge Ne w water Le b an o n Or an g e Ha mpton Alexandria Meredith Bris tol Enfield Wolfboro Wakefield Grafton Laconia Pl an tf ie ld Brook Gi lfo r d fie ld Da nbury H ill Sanbornton Gr an t ha m Springfield Alt on Middle Cornish Wil mot Tilton Belmont Ne w to w n F ran k lin Croydon Andove r Du rham New Gilmanton M ilt on London Northfi eld Claremont Sunapee Ne wport Sali bury Farmington Ba rns te ad SuttonMerrimackCanterbury Loudon Un ity Newbury Webster Pi ttsfield Rochester Goshen Strafford Wa rne r Sommersworth Ch arle s Bradf ordCounty Concord to wn Ac worth Lempster Epsom Northwood Ba rri ngt on R ol lin g sf ord Hopkinton Do v er Langdon He nnik er Madbury Washington Pembroke Hill sb o r oug h Allens Marlow De er fi eld Bo w town Nottingham Alstead Lee Du rham Newing Dunbarton ton Stoddard De erin g Weare Hookset Ports Wal pole Ant rim Ca ndi a New mark et Ne w C as tle Gils u m Epping Green mouth Ra ymo nd New fi elds la n d Be nning Go ff st o wn Su lliv an Strat Surry ton Frances Au bu rn ham Ry e Ne lson M an c he st er Brent to wn Fremont Wood No rth Wes t Hannock Ne w Ch es te r Exeter Ha mp ton Bos ton moreland Keene G r ee nl an d Rox bury Ha mp Hamp t on Harris vil le Bedford San Da n East Ke ns down Ki ngs Kings to n Mt .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Truman Presents
    TRUMAN PRESENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BRITISH DARTS ORGANISATION BRITISH INTER-COUNTIES DARTS CHAMPIONSHIPS PREMIER DIVISION LONDON 1990 -1991 B MATCH A MATCH COMMENCES 1PM ON COMMENCES 12 NOON ON 9th FEBRUARY 1991 10th FEBRUARY 1991 S.T.C. SOCIAL CLUB S.T.C. SOCIAL CLUB OAKLEIGH ROAD SOUTH ADMISSION BY OAKLEIGH ROAD SOUTH NEW SOUTHGATE PROGRAMME ONLY NEW SOUTHGATE LONDON N111HB Price £1 LONDON N11 1HB Tel: 081-945-2641/3754 Tel: 081-945-2641/3754 The G.L.D.O. reserve all rights of admission, and to eject any person without assigning a reason for doing so Talking Point Visiting Team "LONDON LINES" MEN LADIES • Martin Adams Joanne Barber Jamie Baldwin Nadine BentJey This weekend we play host to the County of Cambridgeshire, and I Ian Brand Sally Clayton would like to extend a warm welcome to all their players, officials and Kevin Brodie Stella Cowlard supporters in the hope that they have an enjoyable, if not entirely Andy Callaby Monica Fowle successful visit. It is also a great pleasure to return to the S.T.C. Social Simon Cassidy Lorraine Gilbert Club. This is our third home match at the venue and it is proving to be Alan Driver Sandra Greatbatch a lucky one for us with previous victories over Lincolnshire and Bob Foster Trish Hellewell Glamorgan already in the bag. Let's hope that thattrend continues this Nigel Goude Carole Hudson weekend. My thanks are extended to our sponsors, Watney-Truman Barry Greatbatch June Lambe and to the club steward, Anne Pitcher, the club com mittee and bar-staff Shaun Greatbatch for making us welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Badminton
    Facts and Records History of Badminton In 1873, the Duke of Beaufort held a lawn party at his country house in the village of Badminton, Gloucestershire. A game of Poona was played on that day and became popular among British society’s elite. The new party sport became known as “the Badminton game”. In 1877, the Bath Badminton Club was formed and developed the first official set of rules. The Badminton Association was formed at a meeting in Southsea on 13th September 1893. It was the first National Association in the world and framed the rules for the Association and for the game. The popularity of the sport increased rapidly with 300 clubs being introduced by the 1920’s. Rising to 9,000 shortly after World War Π. The International Badminton Federation (IBF) was formed in 1934 with nine founding members: England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Denmark, Holland, Canada, New Zealand and France and as a consequence the Badminton Association became the Badminton Association of England. From nine founding members, the IBF, now called the Badminton World Federation (BWF), has over 160 member countries. The future of Badminton looks bright. Badminton was officially granted Olympic status in the 1992 Barcelona Games. Indonesia was the dominant force in that first Olympic tournament, winning two golds, a silver and a bronze; the country’s first Olympic medals in its history. More than 1.1 billion people watched the 1992 Olympic Badminton competition on television. Eight years later, and more than a century after introducing Badminton to the world, Britain claimed their first medal in the Olympics when Simon Archer and Jo Goode achieved Mixed Doubles Bronze in Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart of Hampshire Devolution and the Future of Local
    www.pwc.co.uk Final Heart of Hampshire Devolution and the future of local government Confidential November 2016 Future of local government in the Heart of Hampshire Final Contents Important notice .......................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary...................................................................................................................... 5 Future of local government in the Heart of Hampshire ............................................................................................. 5 Key points from the analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Key conclusions and securing a devolution deal ....................................................................................................... 11 Overall conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Purpose of this report ....................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2. Hampshire and the Isle of Wight ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State of New Hampshire
    STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SINGLE AUDIT OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 PREPARED BY: DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SINGLE AUDIT OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SINGLE AUDIT OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Letter Of Transmittal ........................................................................................................................... A-1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................B-1 Summary Table Of Federal Program Expenditures By State Agency ...................................................B-2 Financial Statements Independent Auditors’ Report................................................................................................................C-1 Management’s Discussion And Analysis ..............................................................................................C-4 Basic Financial Statements ..................................................................................................................C-13 Notes To The Basic Financial Statements ...........................................................................................C-34 Required Supplementary Information Budget to Actual Schedules ............................................................................................................C-67
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Factors That Encourage Image and Performance Enhancing Drug Taking Behaviours in Adult Rugby Players in England
    Stephen Watkins Brunel University London 1 An investigation into the factors that encourage Image and Performance Enhancing Drug taking behaviours in adult rugby players in England. Stephen R. Watkins A thesis submitted for the degree of Masters of Philosophy Brunel University Department of Life Sciences September 2019 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. A copy of this thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and they must not copy it or use material from it except as permitted by law or with the consent of the author. Stephen Watkins Brunel University London 2 ABSTRACT Pages Abstract 7 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 9 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Introduction to IPED use in Rugby Union 9 1.2 Background to the World Anti-Doping Code 13 1.3 The need for research in Rugby Union 20 CHAPTER TWO – LITERATURE REVIEW 22 2. Review of Literature 22 2.1 Beginner or Young Person Studies 23 2.2 Gifted and Talented Studies 25 2.3 Performance Development Athlete and Performance Athlete Studies 26 2.4 Elite Athlete Level Studies – Attitudes and Prevalence of IPED use 27 2.5 Coach and Support Personnel Studies 33 2.6 Wider Society- Image & Performance Enhancing Drug Studies 38 2.7 Theoretical Concepts of Doping 40 2.7.1 The Push, Pull, Anti-Push, Anti-Pull Theory 41 2.7.2 The Gateway Use Theory of Doping 43 2.7.3 Moral Disengagement Theory 45 2.8 Literature Review Summary 50 2.8.1 Personal 51 2.8.2 Environmental 51 2.8.3 Performance 52 CHAPTER THREE - METHODOLOGY 53 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint Parish Response
    Alresford RUFC – LDF Submission 2010 Management Summary Please find below the Business Plan for Alresford Rugby Club which, after 19 years of participation in senior rugby, is now aiming to expand and develop its position in the local community as well as grow within the Hampshire rugby playing fraternity. The club is fortunate in having, for its size, a number of competent volunteers, team coach’s, first aid personnel and a clear management structure. Financially the club is in a sound position and although it has no ‘bar’ income it is well backed by local sponsors and some key fund raising activities. The club is fast approaching a cross roads where it cannot guarantee to continue playing on an outside town, grace and favour pitch, whilst in the meantime it has attracted more and more young players who have left the Perins School, the majority who live within the town. The club requires a pitch in the town boundary and with the support of the local council, and a piece of suitable land available next to Arlebury Park, it has a golden opportunity to relocate its playing base to the centre of town. This will enhance the opportunity for young players to train and play, for the club, deepen relations with Perins School (which is over the road from Arlebury Park) and provide an improved match day experience for players, opponents and supporters. The Town Council is prepared to assist in this vital initiative by sponsoring a Compulsory Purchase Order for the land adjacent to Arlebury Park. The land is sufficient to provide 2 pitches, and a training area, whilst the rugby club already enjoys the changing, showering and match day entertainment facilities at Arlebury Park.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire: 2010 Summary Population and Housing Characteristics 2010 Census of Population and Housing
    New Hampshire: 2010 Summary Population and Housing Characteristics 2010 Census of Population and Housing Issued November 2012 CPH-1-31 U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census.gov New Hampshire: 2010 Issued November 2012 Summary Population and Housing Characteristics CPH-1-31 U.S. Department of Commerce Rebecca M. Blank, Acting Secretary Rebecca M. Blank, Deputy Secretary Economics and Statistics Administration Vacant, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Acting Director SUGGESTED CITATION U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census of Population and Housing, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics, CPH-1-31, New Hampshire U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2012 ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS ADMINISTRATION Economics and Statistics Administration Vacant, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Acting Director Nancy A. Potok, Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Enrique J. Lamas, Associate Director for Demographic Programs Enrique J. Lamas, Acting Chief, Population Division CONTENTS List of Statistical Tables ..................................... v How to Use This Census Report .............................. I-1 Table Finding Guide ....................................... II-1 User Notes .............................................. III-1 Statistical Tables .......................................... 1 Appendixes A Geographic Terms and Concepts ......................... * B Definitions of Subject Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Divisions 2019-2020
    COUNTY CHAMPIONSHIPS - DIVISIONS 2019-2020 SENIORS 2018-2019 44 teams Teams Premier Berkshire Derbyshire Middlesex 1 Northumberland Nottinghamshire Surrey 1 Sussex 1 Yorkshire 8 1A Bedfordshire Buckinghamshire Cheshire Lancashire Leicestershire 1 Lincolnshire Norfolk 1 Warwickshire 1 8 1B Avon Devonshire Dorset Essex Gloucestershire Hampshire Kent 1 Middlesex 2 8 2A Durham Leicestershire 2 Northamptonshire South Yorkshire Staffordshire Warwickshire 2 Worcestershire 7 2B Cambridgeshire 1 Cambridgeshire 2 Hertfordshire Kent 2 Norfolk 2 Suffolk Surrey 3 7 2C Cornwall Gwent Somerset Surrey 2 Sussex 2 Sussex 3 Wiltshire 7 VETERANS 2018 – 2019 78 teams Teams Premier Berkshire 1 Hertfordshire 1 Kent 1 Leicestershire 1 Nottinghamshire 1 Sussex 1 Worcestershire 1 Yorkshire 1 8 1A Avon Derbyshire Gloucestershire Northumberland South Yorkshire Warwickshire 1 Yorkshire 2 7 1B Cambridgeshire 1 Devonshire 1 Essex 1 Middlesex 1 Middlesex 2 Norfolk 1 Sussex 2 7 2A Cheshire Lancashire Lincolnshire Northamptonshire 1 Northamptonshire 2 Staffordshire Yorkshire 3 7 2B Bedfordshire 1 Berkshire 2 Buckinghamshire 1 Buckinghamshire 2 Cambridgeshire 2 Hertfordshire 2 Suffolk 7 2C Essex 2 Kent 2 Kent 3 Middlesex 3 Surrey 1 Surrey 2 Sussex 3 7 2D Hampshire 1 Herefordshire Oxfordshire 1 Somerset 1 Warwickshire 2 Wiltshire 1 Wiltshire 2 7 3A Durham Leicestershire 2 Norfolk 2 North Wales Shropshire Warwickshire 3 Worcestershire 2 7 3B Berkshire 3 Berkshire 4 Hertfordshire 3 Kent 4 Kent 5 Middlesex 4 Middlesex 5 7 3C Bedfordshire 2 Cambridgeshire 3 Norfolk 3 Kent 6
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Records
    Badminton England Facts and Records Index (cltr + click to jump to a particular section): 1. History of Badminton 2. Olympic Games 3. World Championships 4. Sudirman Cup 5. Thomas Cup 6. Uber Cup 7. Commonwealth Games 8. European Individual Championships 9. European Mixed Championships 10. England International Caps 11. All England Open Badminton Championships 12. England’s Record in International Matches 13. The Stuart Wyatt Trophy 14. International Open Tournaments 15. International Challenge Tournaments 16. English National Championships 17. The All England Seniors’ Open Championships 18. English National Junior Championships 19. Inter-County Championships 20. National Leisure Centre Championships 21. Masters County Challenge 22. Masters County Championships 23. English Recipients for Honours for Services to Badminton 24. Recipients of Awards made by Badminton Association of England Badminton England Facts & Records: Page 1 of 86 As at May 2021 Please contact [email protected] to suggest any amendments. Badminton England Facts and Records 25. English recipients of Awards made by the Badminton World Federation 1. The History of Badminton: Badminton House and Estate lies in the heart of the Gloucestershire countryside and is the private home of the 12th Duke and Duchess of Beaufort and the Somerset family. The House is not normally open to the general public, it dates from the 17th century and is set in a beautiful deer park which hosts the world-famous Badminton Horse Trials. The Great Hall at Badminton House is famous for an incident on a rainy day in 1863 when the game of badminton was said to have been invented by friends of the 8th Duke of Beaufort.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixtures and Results
    Fixtures and Results Matches From: Saturday 17 October, 2015 Matches To: Saturday 17 October, 2015 Essex (Canterbury Jack) League 1 17/10/2015 Stanford Le Hope 16 - 18 Canvey Island Snows Group Hampshire 1 17/10/2015 Bognor 36 - 20 Millbrook This fixture has been re-arranged from Saturday 03 Oct 2015 Herts/Middlesex 1 17/10/2015 Kilburn Cosmos 27 - 0 Old Streetonians Shepherd Neame Kent 2 17/10/2015 Shooters Hill - AWO Orpington This fixture has been re-arranged from Saturday 19 Sep 2015 Surrey 3 17/10/2015 Metropolitan Police 10 - 20 Bec Old Boys Surrey 4 17/10/2015 Old Oundelians 59 - 32 Woking This fixture has been re-arranged from Saturday 19 Sep 2015 Sussex Spitfire 1 17/10/2015 Lewes 31 - 12 Seaford Midhurst 32 - 19 Crowborough II Page 1 of 1 RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION 17 October 2015 London & SE Division National League 3 London & SE P W D L PF PA PD Pts Bonus Adjust pts Tonbridge Juddian 6 6 0 0 244 111 133 29 5 0 London Irish Wild Geese 6 6 0 0 234 122 112 29 5 0 Westcombe Park 6 5 0 1 157 101 56 24 4 0 East Grinstead 6 4 0 2 164 89 75 21 5 0 Guernsey 6 4 0 2 197 145 52 20 4 0 Shelford 6 4 0 2 155 123 32 20 4 0 Hertford 6 4 0 2 200 117 83 18 2 0 Chichester 6 3 0 3 141 171 -30 14 2 0 Colchester 6 2 0 4 119 131 -12 10 2 0 Wimbledon 6 2 0 4 105 145 -40 9 1 0 Gravesend 6 1 0 5 125 164 -39 8 4 0 Bracknell 6 1 0 5 110 169 -59 8 4 0 Westcliff 6 0 0 6 104 220 -116 2 2 0 Eton Manor 6 0 0 6 61 308 -247 1 1 0 London 1 North P W D L PF PA PD Pts Bonus Adjust pts Brentwood 6 6 0 0 229 96 133 29 5 0 Tring 6 5 0 1 254 135 119 25 5 0 Thurrock 6 5 0
    [Show full text]
  • Bygone Hampshire
    71^' YGONE >.'': i^;-:^'•':-;C "'•}'• 1,.-^ i'.'( > y--^"' University of | Southern jii brary pj WILLI A M ANDREWS'"^ z "^ . ''^'K^ C> '"kti '^Cit^.'^'^' ^^' ^^ .-. V*' BYGONE HAMPSHIRE. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/bygonehampshireOOandriala Ftoni a Photo by\ \F. A. Grant. WEST FRONT, WINCHESTKK CATHEDRAL. : Begone - - Ibampebtre MtUiam anDrew6 LONDON WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., 5, FARRINGDON AVENUE. 1899. DA H p. A 5-7 preface. I "HE history of Hampshire in the olden time is of unusual interest, and I hope the follow- ing pages dealing with it in a popular and exact manner will not fail to entertain and instruct the reader. Considerable attention is paid to Silches- ter, which is a place of national, as well as local, importance. William Andrews. The Hull Press, May jDay, i8gg. 645945 Contents. PACK. Historic Hampshire. By Thomas Frost. .... i The Romano-British City of Silchester. By Frederick Davis, F.s.A. 17 England's First Capital. By Thomas Frost. ... 75 Winchester Cathedral. By England Howlett. ... 88 The Hospital of St. Cross. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a. ioi Winchester College. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a. - 113 The New Forest. By Thomas Frost. 126 The Death of William Rufus. By Thomas Frost - - 134 St. Swithin. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a. - - - 140 William of Wykeham. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a. - 151 The Sanctuary of Beaulieu Abbey. By Thomas Frost. - 158 Southampton in the Olden Time. By Thomas Frost. - - 166 The Old Religious Houses of Southampton.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New Hampsnire Banking Department 53 Regional Drive, Suite 200 Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Telephone:(603) 271-3561 FAX:(603) 271-1090 Or (603) 271-0750
    DEC21'18pm 1=26 DOS State of New Hampsnire Banking Department 53 Regional Drive, Suite 200 Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Telephone:(603) 271-3561 FAX:(603) 271-1090 or (603) 271-0750 December 20, 2018 His Excellency, Governor Christopher T. Sununu And the Honorable Council State House Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Requested Action The New Hampshire Banking Commission is submitting its Annual Report for calendar year ending December 31, 2017 pursuant to RSA 383:15. Explanation Enclosed are copies of the One Hundred Seventy-Third Annual Report of the Bank Commissioner which covers administration and operation pursuant to RSA 383:15. Respectfully submitted, Gerald H. Little Bank Commissioner TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964 / ★ * * ★ ■owoaassm [liiisajQg 71 His £xce//ency, Governor Christopher T. Sununu And the Honorable Council State House Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Dear Governor Sununu and Council: I am pleased to present to you this 173rd Annual Report of the Bank Commissioner. As required by RSA 383:15, this report contains background information on each entity under the supervision of the Banking Department, lists the significant events and issues we addressed during the year, and points out several interesting statistics and trends regarding the many industries regulated by the department. This report sboujs that the years-long trend of consolidation via mergers and acquisitions among j state-chartered banks and credit unions has paused for a moment. In fact, there u;as a slight uptick ^ in the number of depository institutions regulated by the New Hampshire Banking Department when \ Mascoma Savings Bank of Lebanon, New Hampshire converted from a federal charter under the | jurisc/iciion of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to a state-charter.
    [Show full text]