Clinical Epidemiology and Natural History of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical Epidemiology and Natural History of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PubMed Central YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 72 (1999), pp. 81-92. Copyright © 2000. All rights reserved. Clinical Epidemiology and Natural History of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Amnon Sonnenberg and Hashem B. El-Serag Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico In the MUSE classification ofgastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophagitis is assessed by the presence ofmetaplasia, ulcer, stricture, or erosion, each being graded as absent, mild or severe. Daily reflux symptoms affect about 4 to 7 percent of the population; erosive esophagitis occurs in about 2 percent; the prevalence rate ofBarrett's metaplasia is 0.4 percent; and esophageal adeno- carcinoma leads to two deaths per million living population. In persons with GERD symptoms, about 20 percent arefound to have erosive esophagitis, while ulcers or strictures arefound in less than 5 percent of all patients with erosive esophagitis. No clear-cut temporal progression exists between successive grades ofdisease severity, as the most severe grade of GERD is reached at the onset ofthe disease. Mildforms ofGERD tend to be more common in women than men, while severe GERD characterized by erosive esophagitis, esophageal ulcer, stricture or Barrett's metaplasia are far more common in men than women. All forms of GERD affect Caucasians more often than African Americans or Native Americans. The prevalence of GERD is high among developed coun- tries in North America and Europe and relatively low in developing countries in Africa and Asia. During the past three decades, hospital discharges and mortality rates of gastric cancer, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer have declined, while those of esophageal adenocarcinoma and GERD have markedly risen. These opposing time trends suggest that corpus gastritis secondary to Helicobacter pylori infection protects against GERD. This hypothesis is consistent with the geo- graphic and ethnic distributions of GERD. Case-control studies also indicate that cases with ero- sive esophagitis are less likely to harbor active or chronic corpus gastritis than controls without esophagitis. INTRODUCTION history and focus attention on recent developments in these two areas. New data The general epidemiology of gastroe- are emerging to suggest that, besides pep- sophageal reflux disease (GERD)b was tic ulcer and gastric cancer, gastrointesti- presented in several previous articles [1- nal infection with Helicobacterpylori may 3]. Rather than provide another compre- also explain several characteristic features hensive review of GERD epidemiology, in of GERD epidemiology. We conclude by the present article we will discuss primar- listing the many remaining open questions ily its clinical epidemiology and natural of GERD. a To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Amnon Sonnenberg, M.D., M.Sc., Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center 1 1 1-F, 1501 San Pedro Drive SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108. Tel.: 505-265-171 1; Fax: 505-256-5751; E-mail: [email protected]. b Abbreviations: GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs. 81 82 Sonnenberg and El-Serag: GERD epidemiology CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY the submucosa. In a minority of patients, healing of erosions or ulcers results in Clinical presentation scarring and formation of a peptic stric- ture. The term gastroesophageal reflux dis- The Savary-Miller classification of ease (GERD) is used to describe the symp- GERD puts much emphasis on various toms and changes of the esophageal types of erosions, but lumps esophageal mucosa that result from reflux of stomach metaplasia, ulcers and strictures into one contents into the esophagus. GERD grade. Moreover, it does not account for patients present with symptoms of epigas- the frequent concurrence of Barrett's tric pain, heartburn, pharyngeal burning, epithelium with stricture or stricture with regurgitation of gastric contents, acidic erosions. The newer, more refined, MUSE taste and dysphagia. Such symptoms may classification grades esophagitis according be experienced daily, weekly or only few to presence of metaplasia, ulcer, stricture times per month. With respect to GERD, or erosion, each being assigned a value individual symptoms carry a sensitivity or ranging from 0 to 2, that is, absent, mild or specificity that, in general, do not exceed severe, respectively [5]. 65 percent or 80 percent, respectively [4]. Barrett's epithelium is considered a The frequency and severity of symptoms premalignant lesion, as the incidence rate from gastroesophageal reflux do not corre- of esophageal adenocarcinoma developing late with the amount of morphologic from Barrett's mucosa is 1 percent per changes of the mucosa seen on endoscop- year [6]. In the International Classification ic examination of the esophagus. of Diseases, esophageal adenocarcinoma Most commonly used grading sys- is listed as "cardiac cancer." The demo- tems of GERD are based on the Savary- graphic characteristics and time trends of Miller classification [5]. Subjects with esophageal adenocarcinoma (or cancer of reflux symptoms but no macroscopically the gastric cardia) are very similar to those visible lesions are said to have reflux dis- of GERD. They are strikingly different ease without esophagitis, sometimes from those of adenocarcinoma in the gas- referred to as "grade 0." Peptic esophagitis tric body and antrum or squamous carci- is graded according to the extent and noma of the esophagus. Despite these severity of macroscopically visible ero- obvious similarities and its origin from sions: single patchy, large confluent or cir- Barrett's metaplasia, however, esophageal cumferential erosions representing grade I, adenocarcinoma is not included in the II, or III, respectively. The terms "compli- classification of esophagitis. cated esophagitis" or "grade IV" relate to esophagitis accompanied by Barrett's Prevalence rates mucosa, ulcers or strictures. The syn- onyms "Barrett's esophagus," "epitheli- Daily reflux symptoms affect about 4 um" or "metaplasia" refer to the replace- to 7 percent of the population, while ment of esophageal squamous epithelium esophageal adenocarcinoma leads to 2.5 by a gastric type of columnar epithelium deaths per million living population [2-3]. with (or without) intestinal metaplasia that The prevalence rates of the other presenta- reaches 2 to 3 cm above the lower tions of reflux disease in the middle range esophageal sphincter. Barrett's epithelium between these two extremes are far less is more susceptible than the regular squa- well characterized. A recent study from mous epithelium of the esophagus to the China estimated a 5 percent prevalence development of deep ulcers that reach into rate of erosive esophagitis [7]. Of those Sonnenberg and El-Serag: GERD epidemiology 83 presenting with symptoms suggestive of salivary secretion interferes with normal GERD, 18.5 percent were found to have esophageal clearance and also results in an erosive esophagitis. A Swedish study increased risk for erosive esophagitis [15]. reported an incidence rate of 120 new Presently, there are no risk factors cases of erosive esophagitis per 100,000 known to disrupt tissue resistance, except per year [8]. Assuming a case history of 20 for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs years yields a crude estimate 2.4 percent (NSAIDs). Several authors have suggested for the prevalence rate. Ulcers or strictures that more severe forms of peptic esophagi- were found in less than 5 percent of all tis, associated with large confluent ero- patients with erosive esophagitis. Lastly, a sions, strictures and Barrett's esophagus, post-mortem study from Olmsted County are more common in patients on chronic in Minnesota found a prevalence rate of consumption of NSAIDs [16-18]. In the 0.4 percent for Barrett's esophagus [9]. population of veterans, many of the dis- Since symptoms are a poor indicators eases commonly treated with NSAIDs, for disease severity, a study trying to such as osteoarthritis, back pain or tension assess the true prevalence of erosive headache, were associated with a small but esophagitis and its complications would nevertheless significant odds ratio of about need to subject a large group of persons to 1.4 for reflux esophagitis [16]. upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. For Frequent occurrence of nighttime obvious reasons, such a study is difficult reflux can irritate the pharyngeal and and expensive to conduct. Because symp- laryngeal structures and result in laryngitis tomatic patients are more likely to under- or even hoarseness and aphonia. go endoscopy, incidence and prevalence Aspiration of gastric contents has been rates based largely on routine endoscopy associated with asthma, pneumonia, and reports may overestimate the prevalence bronchiectasies [19-21]. In our epidemio- rate of erosive esophagitis in the general logical study of GERD among U.S. mili- population. The prevalence of GERD tary veterans, we found both erosive varies markedly between different popula- esophagitis and esophageal stricture to be tions [1, 10]. During the past three decades significantly associated with sinusitis, the prevalence of GERD has increased aphonia, pharyngitis, laryngeal stenosis, more than two-fold, and previously report- laryngitis, chronic bronchitis, asthma, ed data may no longer apply to present day chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, populations [3]. With all these caveats in pulmonary fibrosis,
Recommended publications
  • Abdominal Pain - Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    ACS/ASE Medical Student Core Curriculum Abdominal Pain - Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ABDOMINAL PAIN - GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE Epidemiology and Pathophysiology Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most commonly encountered benign foregut disorders. Approximately 20-40% of adults in the United States experience chronic GERD symptoms, and these rates are rising rapidly. GERD is the most common gastrointestinal-related disorder that is managed in outpatient primary care clinics. GERD is defined as a condition which develops when stomach contents reflux into the esophagus causing bothersome symptoms and/or complications. Mechanical failure of the antireflux mechanism is considered the cause of GERD. Mechanical failure can be secondary to functional defects of the lower esophageal sphincter or anatomic defects that result from a hiatal or paraesophageal hernia. These defects can include widening of the diaphragmatic hiatus, disturbance of the angle of His, loss of the gastroesophageal flap valve, displacement of lower esophageal sphincter into the chest, and/or failure of the phrenoesophageal membrane. Symptoms, however, can be accentuated by a variety of factors including dietary habits, eating behaviors, obesity, pregnancy, medications, delayed gastric emptying, altered esophageal mucosal resistance, and/or impaired esophageal clearance. Signs and Symptoms Typical GERD symptoms include heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, excessive eructation, and epigastric pain. Patients can also present with extra-esophageal symptoms including cough, hoarse voice, sore throat, and/or globus. GERD can present with a wide spectrum of disease severity ranging from mild, intermittent symptoms to severe, daily symptoms with associated esophageal and/or airway damage. For example, severe GERD can contribute to shortness of breath, worsening asthma, and/or recurrent aspiration pneumonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis Presenting with Severe Anemia and Near Syncope
    J Am Board Fam Med: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.2012.06.110269 on 7 November 2012. Downloaded from BRIEF REPORT Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis Presenting with Severe Anemia and Near Syncope Nneka Ekunno, DO, MPH, Kirk Munsayac, DO, Allen Pelletier, MD, and Thad Wilkins, MD Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders or eosinophilic digestive disorders encompass a spectrum of rare gastrointestinal disorders that includes eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and eosinophilic colitis. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by eosino- philic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract. The clinical manifestations include anemia, dyspepsia, and diarrhea. Endoscopy with biopsy showing histologic evidence of eosinophilic infiltration is consid- ered definitive for diagnosis. Corticosteroid therapy, food allergen testing, elimination diets, and ele- mental diets are considered effective treatments for eosinophilic gastroenteritis. The treatment and prognosis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis is determined by the severity of the clinical manifestations. We describe a 24-year-old woman with eosinophilic gastroenteritis presenting as epigastric pain with a history of severe iron deficiency anemia, asthma, eczema, and allergic rhinitis, and we review the litera- ture regarding presentation, diagnostic testing, pathophysiology, predisposing factors, and treatment recommendations. (J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:913–918.) Keywords: Case Reports, Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis, Gastrointestinal Disorders copyright. A 24-year-old nulliparous African-American woman During examination, her height was 62 inches, was admitted after an episode of near syncope asso- weight 117 lb, and body mass index 21.44 kg/m2. Her ciated with 2 days of fatigue and dizziness. She re- heart rate was 111 beats per minute, blood pressure ported gradual onset of dyspepsia over 2 to 3 121/57 mm Hg, respiratory rate 20 breaths per minute, months.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
    Guidelines for Clinical Care Quality Department Ambulatory GERD Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Guideline Team Team Leader Patient population: Adults Joel J Heidelbaugh, MD Objective: To implement a cost-effective and evidence-based strategy for the diagnosis and Family Medicine treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Team Members Key Points: R Van Harrison, PhD Diagnosis Learning Health Sciences Mark A McQuillan, MD History. If classic symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation dominate a patient’s history, then General Medicine they can help establish the diagnosis of GERD with sufficiently high specificity, although sensitivity Timothy T Nostrant, MD remains low compared to 24-hour pH monitoring. The presence of atypical symptoms (Table 1), Gastroenterology although common, cannot sufficiently support the clinical diagnosis of GERD [B*]. Testing. No gold standard exists for the diagnosis of GERD [A*]. Although 24-hour pH monitoring Initial Release is accepted as the standard with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 95%, false positives and false March 2002 negatives still exist [II B*]. Endoscopy lacks sensitivity in determining pathologic reflux but can Most Recent Major Update identify complications (eg, strictures, erosive esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus) [I A]. Barium May 2012 radiography has limited usefulness in the diagnosis of GERD and is not recommended [III B*]. Content Reviewed Therapeutic trial. An empiric trial of anti-secretory therapy can identify patients with GERD who March 2018 lack alarm or warning symptoms (Table 2) [I A*] and may be helpful in the evaluation of those with atypical manifestations of GERD, specifically non-cardiac chest pain [II B*]. Treatment Ambulatory Clinical Lifestyle modifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    The new england journal of medicine clinical practice Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Peter J. Kahrilas, M.D. This Journal feature begins with a case vignette highlighting a common clinical problem. Evidence supporting various strategies is then presented, followed by a review of formal guidelines, when they exist. The article ends with the author’s clinical recommendations. A 53-year-old man, who is otherwise healthy and has a 20-year history of occasional heartburn, reports having had worsening heartburn for the past 12 months, with daily symptoms that disturb his sleep. He reports having had no dysphagia, gastroin- testinal bleeding, or weight loss and in fact has recently gained 20 lb (9 kg). What would you advise regarding his evaluation and treatment? The Clinical Problem From the Division of Gastroenterology, Gastroesophageal reflux disease is the most common gastrointestinal diagnosis re- Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago. Ad- corded during visits to outpatient clinics.1 In the United States, it is estimated that dress reprint requests to Dr. Kahrilas at the Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 St. Clair 14 to 20% of adults are affected, although such percentages are at best approxima- St., Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611-2951, tions, given that the disease has a nebulous definition and that such estimates are or at [email protected]. based on the prevalence of self-reported chronic heartburn.2 A current definition of N Engl J Med 2008;359:1700-7. the disorder is “a condition which develops when the ref lux of stomach contents causes Copyright © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. troublesome symptoms (i.e., at least two heartburn episodes per week) and/or complications.”3 Several extraesophageal manifestations of the disease are well rec- ognized, including laryngitis and cough (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children and Adults
    A GuideA toGuide Eosinophilic to Eosinophilic Esophagitis Esophagitisin Children in Children and Adultsand Adults What is Eosinophilic Esophagitis? Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging disease related to food ingestion or aeroallergens. It is characterized by an isolated inflammation of the esophagus by a specific white blood cell the eosinophil. Several clinical symptoms can occur including difficulty swallowing, food becoming stuck in the esophagus, or symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) such as vomiting, regurgitation, abdominal pain or heartburn. Uneffected individuals have no eosinophils in their esophagus while people with acid reflux may have a few esophageal eosinophils secondary to acid irritation. While other disorders such as parasitic disease and Crohn’s disease could potentially cause an esophageal eosinophilia, EoE is the most common cause of intense esophageal eosinophilia. What should you do if you believe that you or your child may have EoE? If you believe that either you or your child may have symptoms of EoE you should contact your primary physician, explain your concerns and ask for a referral to a gastroenterologist. An upper endoscopy with biopsy may need to be scheduled. A barium contrast study may also be useful in determining if the esophagus is narrowed or strictured. Where can you get additional information on EoE? The First International Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Research Symposium brought together pediatric and adult experts from around the world to discuss the abundance of new information on EoE. The idea of The International Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Research (TIGER) consortium was created. TIGER is currently in the process of understanding and assessing diagnostic techniques, treatments and treatment approaches for patients with EoE.
    [Show full text]
  • Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders
    Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology (2019) 57:272–285 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-019-08732-1 Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders Nirmala Gonsalves1 Published online:22 March 2019 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID) are a group of disorders characterized by pathologic eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, or colon leading to organ dysfunction and clinical symptoms (J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; Spergel et al., 52: 300–306, 2011). These disorders include eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), eosinophilic gastritis (EG), eosino- philic gastroenteritis (EGE), eosinophilic enteritis (EE), and eosinophilic colitis (EC). Symptoms are dependent not only on the location (organ) as well as extent (layer invasion of the bowel wall). Common symptoms of EoE include dysphagia and food impaction in adults and heartburn, abdominal pain, and vomiting in children. Common symptoms of the other EGIDs include abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, early satiety, diarrhea, and weight loss. These disorders are considered immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disorders with strong links to food allergen triggers. Treatment strategies focus on either medical or dietary therapy. These options include not only controlling symptoms and bowel inflammation but also on identifying potential food triggers. This chapter will focus on the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment of these increasingly recognized disorders. Keywords Eosinophilic gastroenteritis . Eosinophilic gastritis . Eosinophilic esophagitis . Dysphagia . Food impaction . Food allergy Introduction purpose of this chapter, we will discuss these disorders sepa- rately and focus on the available data on the clinical presenta- Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID) are a group of tion, pathophysiology, and treatment. disorders characterized by pathologic eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, or colon leading to organ dysfunction and clinical symptoms [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Bleeding in the Digestive Tract
    Bleeding in the Digestive Tract National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse Bleeding in the digestive tract is a symptom of a disease rather than a disease itself. A number of different conditions can cause bleeding. Most causes of bleeding are Esophagus U.S. Department related to conditions that can be cured of Health and or controlled, such as ulcers or hemor­ Human Services rhoids. Some causes of bleeding may be Stomach NATIONAL life threatening. INSTITUTES Duodenum OF HEALTH Locating the source of bleeding is important. Different conditions cause bleeding in the Colon upper digestive tract and the lower digestive (shaded) tract. The upper digestive tract includes the esophagus, stomach, and upper portion of the small intestine, also called the duode­ Small num. The lower digestive tract includes the intestine lower portion of the small intestine; large Rectum Anus intestine, which includes the colon and rectum; and anus. The digestive tract What are the signs of bleeding in the digestive • dark blood mixed with stool tract? • stool mixed or coated with bright red The signs of bleeding in the digestive tract blood depend on the site and severity of bleeding. Signs of bleeding in the lower digestive tract Signs of bleeding in the upper digestive tract include include • black or tarry stool • bright red blood in vomit • dark blood mixed with stool • vomit that looks like coffee grounds • stool mixed or coated with bright red • black or tarry stool blood Sudden, severe bleeding is called acute What causes bleeding in the bleeding. If acute bleeding occurs, symptoms may include digestive tract? A variety of conditions can cause bleeding in • weakness the digestive tract.
    [Show full text]
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis (Eoe)
    Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) What are Gastrointestinal Esoinophilic Diseases (EGID)? EGIDs are a group of diseases that may have a wide variety of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Symptoms occur in combination with increased numbers of eosinophils in the gastrointestinal lining. Eosinophils are a type of white blood cell that has often been seen with allergic diseases, but also are found in other diseases. The abundance of eosinophils can inflame or damage the GI tract. Depending on the part of the GI tract affected, EGIDs can be called a variety of different names, such as: eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) eosinophilic gastritis (EG) eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) eosinophilic colitis (EC) What is eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE)? Although EGID can affect all parts of the GI tract, esophageal esophagitis is often seen. EoE affects the esophagus. The esophagus is the tube that connects the mouth to the stomach. EoE is often a reaction to food allergies, gastroesophageal reflux, or environmental allergies. What are common symptoms? The symptoms of EoE may include swallowing problems (dysphasia), vomiting, food getting stuck in the esophagus (food impaction), heartburn or chest pain, abdominal pain, coughing, or slow growth. The typical EoE patient is a toddler who displays an immune or allergic response, is vomiting and has feeding problems. The toddler may respond to a simple diet that excludes certain types of foods. Other people may have food impaction and swallowing problems. There are also people who may have atypical symptoms, are not having an immune or allergic response, do not respond to dietary exclusions, and may have isolated food impaction incidents. People with GERD may also have the same symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Esophagitis September 16, 2009
    LessLess CommonCommon CausesCauses ofof EsophagitisEsophagitis andand EsophagealEsophageal InjuryInjury andand EsophagealEsophageal AnatomicAnatomic AnomaliesAnomalies SeptemberSeptember 16,16, 20092009 Lauren Briley, M.D. University of Louisville Department of Gastroenterology/Hepatology Esophageal Ulcers Causes of Esophageal Ulcerations - Gastroesophageal reflux disease - Infectious agents: CMV, HSV, HIV, Candida - Inflammatory disorders - Crohn’s disease, BehÇet’s, Vasculitis - Irradiation -Ischemia - Pill-induced - Graft-versus-host disease - Caustic substance ingestion - Post-sclerotherapy - Post-esophageal variceal band ligation - Dermatologic diseases: Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica, Pemphigus vulgaris -Idiopathic © Current Medicine Group Ltd. 2008. Part of Spring TopicsTopics PillPill inducedinduced esophagitisesophagitis ChemotherapyChemotherapy relatedrelated esophagitisesophagitis RadiationRadiation esophagitisesophagitis PostPost sclerotherapysclerotherapy ulcerationulceration InfectiousInfectious esophagitisesophagitis (immunocompetant(immunocompetant vs.vs. immunocompromised)immunocompromised) CausticCaustic injuriesinjuries MiscellaneousMiscellaneous EsophagealEsophageal AbnormalitiesAbnormalities PillPill--InducedInduced EsophagitisEsophagitis PillPill--InducedInduced EsophagitisEsophagitis MechanismMechanism Injury is related to prolonged mucosal contact with a caustic agent 4 known mechanisms of pill induced injury: – production of a caustic acidic solution (e.g., ascorbic acid and ferrous sulfate) – production
    [Show full text]
  • Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis: Case Presentation
    Grand Round Presentation Dipendra Parajuli 2-19-04 University of Louisville Case Report: -A 51 y/o causasian male was referred to a gastroenterology office by his primary care provider for the evaluation of new onset ascites. -The patient had been in his basal level of health till about three months prior to presentation at which time he had been prescribed some antibiotic for presumed prostatitis.University of Louisville -A few days after starting the antibiotic he started experiencing diffuse abdominal cramps associated with nausea, vomiting and watery diarrhea. -He also noticed some staining of the toilet paper with blood but denied any bleeding into the toilet bowl or bloody bowel movements. At this time he also had a low-grade fever. University of Louisville -He denied any chest pains or shortness of breath. -At about the same time however he also started noticing abdominal swelling which kept on increasing and he presented to his primary care provider and was subsequently referred. University of Louisville -PMH Hypertension and DJD and spinal disc disease for which he had had knee and cervical spine surgeries in the remote past. - Personal Hx did admit to heavy alcohol consumption in his younger days a habit he had quit someUniversity 25 years ago. of Louisville Physical Exam -middle aged w/m of stocky built , tattoo on each forearm. -Vital signs were stable and pt was anicteric -He had moderate ascites but none of the other stigmata of chronic liver disease. -Rest of the examination was unremarkable. University of Louisville LABS CBC WBC-16.7, -Neutrophils-38.9 %, - Lymphocytes-15%, HGB-15.3 Platelets -307 ESR-18 BMP Normal Values University of Louisville Liver profile Alk PO4 -89 AST -19 ALT -14 TP - 7.6 Alb -3.8 PT -11 Viral Hepatitis panel - Negative University of Louisville USN -Liver and GB with dopplers revealed cholelithiasis, shrunken liver, ascites and right pleural effusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Atypical and Typical Manifestations of the Hiatal Hernia
    7 Review Article Page 1 of 7 Atypical and typical manifestations of the hiatal hernia Matthew L. Goodwin, Jennifer M. Nishimura, Desmond M. D’Souza Divisions of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA Contributions: (I) Conception and design: None; (II) Administrative support: None; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: None; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: None; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: None; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Desmond M. D’Souza, MD. Associate Professor of Surgery, Division on Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, N847 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Email: Desmond.D’[email protected]. Abstract: Hiatal hernias may present in variety of ways, both typical and atypical. Manifestations are dependent on the type and size of the hernia. Gastrointestinal manifestations are the most common, predominately with GERD and associated syndromes. Typical GERD presents with heartburn and regurgitation as part of a reflux syndrome. Additionally, GERD may manifest as a typical chest pain syndrome unrelated to a cardiac etiology. Hiatal hernia associated GERD may present with esophageal mucosal injury in the form of reflux esophagitis, stricture, Barrett’s esophagus, and progress to esophageal malignancy. Atypical GERD symptoms like cough, laryngitis, asthma, and dental erosions may be may exist with hiatal hernias. GERD symptoms are more often associated with type 1 hiatal hernias. Typical gastrointestinal obstructive symptoms of hiatal hernia manifest as nausea, bloating, emesis, dysphagia, early satiety, and postprandial fullness and pain in the epigastrium and chest.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Treatment of Reflux Esophagitis and Hiatal Hernia/Open Or Laparoscopic
    Criteria #6: Surgical Treatment of Reflux Esophagitis and Hiatal Hernia/Open or Laparoscopic Type I hernias are small and may or may not be accompanied by gastroesphageal reflux disease (GERD). These are treated with medical management. Complications are rare and are mostly related to reflux. Many patients with type II hernias are asymptomatic or have only vague intermittent symptoms. Type II, III, IV paraesophageal hernias account for 5% of all hernias. Paraesophageal hernias are associated with abnormal laxity of structures normally preventing displacement of the stomach (i.e. the gastrosplenic and gastrocolic ligaments). The natural tendency of a type II hernia is progressive enlargement. Type III hernias are type I and II hernias with a sliding element. Type IV hernia is associated with a large defect in the esophageal membrane allowing other organs such as the colon spleen, pancreas or small intestine to enter the hernia sac. Documentation requirements, must include documentation for items 1 and 2: 1. Failed 4-month trial of conservative medical therapy: a. A proton pump inhibitor and over the counter antacid (all) i. Double dose PPI therapy if not responsive after three days ii. Compliant with medications, but persistent reflux regurgitation symptoms iii. Inability to tolerate medications b. Dietary lifestyle management. Note in medical record document attempts at dietary management including avoidance of smoking, weight loss efforts, avoidance of certain foods thought to relax the valve and make reflux more likely (i.e. coffee, chocolate, onions, high- sugar foods, and high-fat foods), no snacking prior to bed time and sleep with head elevated. 2.
    [Show full text]