DOCSLIB.ORG

Stop the Spread: Tilapia Training Package

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stop the Spread: Tilapia Training Package Module 1: Introducing tilapia of Gunther Schmida photo courtesy Module 1: Introducing tilapia Objectives Key messages • Participants will gain an understanding of • Pest fish are a major threat to your local why pest fish are a problem and what the waterways main species are, with particular emphasis • Pest fish spread very quickly on Mozambique tilapia • Pest fish are believed to be mainly spread by • Participants will gain a broad knowledge human activities of tilapia including their characteristics, • Tilapia are threatening to invade the biology, distribution, why they have become Murray–Darling Basin a problem and how they spread Learning resources Intended participants • PowerPoint • All stakeholder groups • Case studies • Learning activities 6 What makes an animal a pest? What is a pest fish? Despite the best efforts of humans to eradicate The term ‘pest fish’ refers to fish species them, many pest animals continue to thrive. that are not native to an area and that have But what is it that makes these animals potential negative social, economic or so persistently invasive? Aside from the environmental impacts. Populations of pest inconsistent attitudes of people to pests, fish have successfully established in many of explanations can be found in the special our local waterways and are a major threat to characteristics of a pest. A pest’s success in the high diversity of native freshwater fish in Australia can mostly be attributed to specific Queensland and New South Wales. aspects of its biology, combined with habitat disturbance that provides favourable conditions The presence of pest fish in natural waterways and a lack of predators and diseases that might can have some serious impacts such as: otherwise limit its numbers and distribution. Habitat • decreased water quality • increased water turbidity and siltation • increased nutrient loads Native fauna and flora • introduction of diseases and parasites • decreased biomass and diversity of rooted water plants • reduced numbers and diversity of native aquatic fauna (through direct competition for food or space, or predation) • decreased numbers and diversity of aquatic insects • altered food chains and other ecological processes • increased dominance of waterbodies by pest fish Economic and recreational • increased pressure on recreationally significant species through competition, etc. • reduced environmental and conservation value of infested waterbodies • diminished recreational value of infested waterbodies • reduced value of recreational and/or commercial fisheries. Furthermore, pest fish such as tilapia and gambusia often exhibit aggressive behaviour, resulting in reduced condition, increased risk of infection from wounds and a higher mortality of native fish. Although the presence of pest fish can potentially have some devastating results, their impacts on a particular area will depend on the specific case; it is important to note that pest fish are often a symptom of a degraded habitat, Stop the spread not a cause. 7 Module 1: Introducing tilapia There are four particular pest fish species that are having serious negative impacts on waterways in New South Wales and southern Queensland: carp (Cyprinus carpio), Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus), redfin (Perca fluviatilis) and eastern gambusia (Gambusia holbrooki). Of these species, the Mozambique tilapia (also known as the Mozambique mouth-brooder) is the only one currently not present in the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB). This pest fish has been listed in the top 100 of the world’s worst introduced species and is regarded as Figure 1.3 Redfin (Perca fluviatilis) photo courtesy of NSW DPI one of the greatest threats to Australia’s native biodiversity. Tilapia were first introduced into Australia in the 1960s as ornamental fish and now dominate many Queensland waterways. The species’ success as an invader can be attributed to its ability to easily and rapidly breed, general hardiness, rapid growth rate and environmental plasticity. Figure 1.4 Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) Figure 1.1 Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Figure 1.2 Eastern gambusia (Gambusia holbrooki) 8 Things to know about tilapia Breeding The Mozambique tilapia is a mouth-brooder, which means that eggs and larvae are reared and protected in the adult’s mouth. The female collects the fertilised eggs into her mouth from a circular pit or nest built (and aggressively defended) by the male. This technique ensures a high juvenile survival rate of 50–90 per cent. Furthermore, tilapia can often reproduce year-round, adding to their ability to quickly establish large populations in a waterway. Figure 1.7 Female Mozambique tilapia carrying In poor environmental conditions, tilapia can juveniles in her mouth use a breeding strategy called stunting, where earlier maturation at a smaller size enables the fish to concentrate their energy on reproduction instead of growth. Figure 1.8 Female Mozambique tilapia with juveniles Habitat preference Tilapia are habitat generalists, meaning Figure 1.5 Mozambique tilapia nests they can adapt to many environments, including disturbed environments where they often flourish. Tilapia can prey shift allowing them to utilise available food sources under a wide range of environmental conditions. The stunting mechanism allows tilapia to exist in extremely high densities and to outcompete natives for food and space. They can survive in conditions too poor to support native fish species, as they can tolerate polluted and turbid waters. In environments with low levels of dissolved oxygen, tilapia can supplement their oxygen requirements by gulping air at the water’s surface. Tilapia are hardy fish, tolerant of a broad range Figure 1.6 Female Mozambique tilapia carrying eggs of environmental conditions such as poor water in her mouth quality, high salinity and high temperatures. They are reportedly able to survive and grow in seawater. They can also survive in water temperatures ranging from 8 °C to 42 °C, Stop the spread 9 Module 1: Introducing tilapia giving them the potential to live in habitats Diet covering a large portion of Australia. The lower temperature range, however, can be a limiting Although tilapia prefer a diet of organic material factor as they require temperatures greater than such as algae, animal waste and microscopic 16 °C to remain active and feed; temperatures organisms, they are known to be flexible in their greater than 20 °C are generally required for food choices and can adapt to alternative food them to breed. sources available in their environment. Reports have shown that tilapia range from being Generally speaking, tilapia inhabit mud- herbivorous to totally carnivorous. Despite what bottomed, well-vegetated areas in slow-flowing some people believe, tilapia also prey on other rivers and streams or still-water habitats. fish; they have even been known to resort to Tilapia also thrive in habitats that consist of cannibalism. the invasive wetland weed para grass (Urochloa mutica). Distribution Tilapia have established populations worldwide and pose severe ecological threats in most countries. In Australia, populations currently exist in a number of locations in tropical and subtropical areas, including both northern and southern Queensland. Tilapia are established in Western Australian rivers that closely resemble systems in the semi-arid north-west of the MDB. Although there are currently no reports of tilapia in the MDB, established populations are known to exist in waterways only a short distance away, such as Boondooma Dam in the Upper Burnett River system. Figure 1.9 An area infested by para grass (Urochloa mutica) Many populations of tilapia also exist in the greater Brisbane area, including: • the Pine Rivers catchment (including North Pine Dam and Lake Kurwongbah) • the Caboolture River • drains near Deception Bay • the Brisbane River (including Lakes Wivenhoe and Somerset) • the Bremer River near Ipswich • the Tingalpa Reservoir • parts of the Lockyer Valley • the lower Albert and Logan rivers • drainages near the Gold Coast. In order to best use the resources available to tackle pest fish incursions, Queensland has refocused its activities to give priority to vulnerable catchments and ‘hot spots’ within those catchments. The focus is also on increasing community awareness, which, in combination with surveillance by fisheries teams, will increase the chances of early detection. The MDB has been identified as one of these vulnerable catchments. Figure 1.10 Para grass (Urochloa mutica) 10 To prevent the introduction of tilapia into the Tilapia hot spots in and around the MDB MDB, specific areas are currently targeted for community education, pest fish monitoring and Caboolture River surveillance, and control and eradication where Dalby necessary. These areas (listed opposite) are Kingaroy targets because of their direct links with the Lake Kurwongbah, Petrie MDB, as well as demographic and geographic factors that put them at risk of an incursion. Maroon Dam, Boonah Some of these sites already contain established Moogerah Dam (near Aratula) populations of tilapia and are regularly Oakey monitored for changes in the population dynamics that could increase the chance of Roma tilapia spreading further. Toowoomba Upper Burnett River Upper Stanley River Warwick Wivenhoe Dam Stop the spread 11 Module 1: Introducing tilapia Figure 1.11 Oreochromis mossambicus distribution throughout Queensland, as at April 2011 12 How pest fish spread The term ‘new incursion’ is used when a pest 1977 Tingalpa
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Queensland Public Boat Ramps
    Queensland public boat ramps Ramp Location Ramp Location Atherton shire Brisbane city (cont.) Tinaroo (Church Street) Tinaroo Falls Dam Shorncliffe (Jetty Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Balonne shire Shorncliffe (Sinbad Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank St George (Bowen Street) Jack Taylor Weir Shorncliffe (Yundah Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Banana shire Wynnum (Glenora Street) Wynnum Creek—north bank Baralaba Weir Dawson River Broadsound shire Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (lower ramp) Carmilla Beach (Carmilla Creek Road) Carmilla Creek—south bank, mouth of creek Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (upper ramp) Clairview Beach (Colonial Drive) Clairview Beach Moura Dawson River—8 km west of Moura St Lawrence (Howards Road– Waverley Creek) Bund Creek—north bank Lake Victoria Callide Creek Bundaberg city Theodore Dawson River Bundaberg (Kirby’s Wall) Burnett River—south bank (5 km east of Bundaberg) Beaudesert shire Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (downstream) Logan River (Henderson Street– Henderson Reserve) Logan Reserve Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (upstream) Biggenden shire Burdekin shire Paradise Dam–Main Dam 500 m upstream from visitors centre Barramundi Creek (Morris Creek Road) via Hodel Road Boonah shire Cromarty Creek (Boat Ramp Road) via Giru (off the Haughton River) Groper Creek settlement Maroon Dam HG Slatter Park (Hinkson Esplanade) downstream from jetty Moogerah Dam AG Muller Park Groper Creek settlement Bowen shire (Hinkson
    [Show full text]
  • Stewart and Sunwater; Stanwell (Third Party)
    Decision and Reasons for Decision Application Number: 310775 and 311208 Applicant: Stewart Respondent: SunWater Limited Third Party: Stanwell Corporation Limited Decision Date: 21 December 2012 Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – RIGHT TO INFORMATION – REFUSAL OF ACCESS – QUESTION OF JURISDICTION – application for documents created prior to 1 July 2009 relating to operation of Tinaroo Dam – whether disclosure of information was captured by section 11A of the repealed Freedom of Information Act 1992 (Qld) – whether disclosure of information is captured by the definitions in section 11 and schedule 1, section 14 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – RIGHT TO INFORMATION – QUEENSLAND – JURISDICTION – application for information relating to operation of Tinaroo Dam – whether requested documents are ‘documents of an agency’ – section 12 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – RIGHT TO INFORMATION – REFUSAL OF ACCESS – EXEMPT INFORMATION – application for information relating to operation of Tinaroo Dam – whether disclosure could reasonably be expected to found an action for breach of confidence – sections 47(3)(a) and 48 and schedule 3, section 8 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (Qld) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – RIGHT TO INFORMATION – REFUSAL OF ACCESS – CONTRARY TO PUBLIC INTEREST INFORMATION – application for information relating to operation of Tinaroo Dam – whether disclosure of information would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest – sections 47(3)(b) and 49 of the Right to Information
    [Show full text]
  • Restricted Water Ski Areas in Queensland
    Restricted Water Ski areas in Queensland Watercourse Date of Gazettal Any person operating a ship towing anyone by a line attached to the ship (including for example a person water skiing or riding on a toboggan or tube) within the waters listed below endangers marine safety. Brisbane River 20/10/2006 South Brisbane and Town Reaches of the Brisbane River between the Merivale Bridge and the Story Bridge. Burdekin River, Charters Towers 13/09/2019 All waters of The Weir on the Burdekin River, Charters Towers. Except: • commencing at a point on the waterline of the eastern bank of the Burdekin River nearest to location 19°55.279’S, 146°16.639’E, • then generally southerly along the waterline of the eastern bank to a point nearest to location 19°56.530’S, 146°17.276’E, • then westerly across Burdekin River to a point on the waterline of the western bank nearest to location 19°56.600’S, 146°17.164’E, • then generally northerly along the waterline of the western bank to a point on the waterline nearest to location 19°55.280’S, 146°16.525’E, • then easterly across the Burdekin River to the point of commencement. As shown on the map S8sp-73 prepared by Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ) which can be found on the MSQ website at www.msq.qld.gov.au/s8sp73map and is held at MSQ’s Townsville Office. Burrum River .12/07/1996 The waters of the Burrum River within 200 metres north from the High Water mark of the southern river bank and commencing at a point 50 metres downstream of the public boat ramp off Burrum Heads Road to a point 200 metres upstream of the upstream boundary of Lions Park, Burrum Heads.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnett Mary WQIP Ecologically Relevant Targets
    Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis 1 Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef TropWATER Report 14/32 Prepared by Jon Brodie and Stephen Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone : (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ 2 Information should be cited as: Brodie J., Lewis S. (2014) Ecologically relevant targets for pollutant discharge from the drainage basins of the Burnett Mary Region, Great Barrier Reef. TropWATER Report No. 14/32, Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville, 41 pp. For further information contact: Catchment to Reef Research Group/Jon Brodie and Steven Lewis Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University ATSIP Building Townsville, QLD 4811 [email protected] © James Cook University, 2014. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of the work may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of TropWATER. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The copyright owner shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Cover Change in the South East Queensland Catchments Natural Resource Management Region 2010–11
    Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts Land cover change in the South East Queensland Catchments Natural Resource Management region 2010–11 Summary The woody vegetation clearing rate for the SEQ region for 10 2010–11 dropped to 3193 hectares per year (ha/yr). This 9 8 represented a 14 per cent decline from the previous era. ha/year) 7 Clearing rates of remnant woody vegetation decreased in 6 5 2010-11 to 758 ha/yr, 33 per cent lower than the previous era. 4 The replacement land cover class of forestry increased by 3 2 a further 5 per cent over the previous era and represented 1 Clearing Rate (,000 26 per cent of the total woody vegetation 0 clearing rate in the region. Pasture 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 remained the dominant replacement All Woody Clearing Woody Remnant Clearing land cover class at 34 per cent of total clearing. Figure 1. Woody vegetation clearing rates in the South East Queensland Catchments NRM region. Figure 2. Woody vegetation clearing for each change period. Great state. Great opportunity. Woody vegetation clearing by Woody vegetation clearing by remnant status tenure Table 1. Remnant and non-remnant woody vegetation clearing Table 2. Woody vegetation clearing rates in the South East rates in the South East Queensland Catchments NRM region. Queensland Catchments NRM region by tenure. Woody vegetation clearing rate (,000 ha/yr) of Woody vegetation clearing rate (,000 ha/yr) on Non-remnant Remnant
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Mabi Forest
    Recovery Plan for Mabi Forest Title: Recovery Plan for Mabi Forest Prepared by: Peter Latch for the Mabi Forest Recovery Team Photos on title page: top left – Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo; top right – Mabi forest; bottom – restoration work; bottom left – Mabi forest. © The State of Queensland, Environmental Protection Agency, 2008 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written knowledge of the Environmental Protection Agency. Inquiries should be addressed to PO Box 15155, CITY EAST, QLD 4002. Copies may be obtained from the: Executive Director Conservation Services Environmental Protection Agency PO Box 15155 City East Qld 4002 Disclaimer: The Australian Government, in partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency facilitates the publication of recovery plans to detail the actions needed for the conservation of threatened native wildlife. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, and may also be constrained by the need to address other conservation priorities. Approved recovery actions may be subject to modification due to changes in knowledge and changes in conservation status. Publication reference: Latch, P. 2008. Recovery Plan for Mabi Forest. Report to Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra. Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane. 2 Contents Page Executive Summary 4 1. General information 5 Conservation status 5 International obligations 5 Affected interests 5 Consultation with Indigenous people 5 Benefits to other species or communities 5 Social and economic impacts 6 2. Biological information 7 Community description 7 Distribution 8 Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Specific Ecologically Relevant Water Quality Targets for the Great Barrier Reef
    Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier Reef Jon Brodie, Mark Baird, Jane Waterhouse, Mathieu Mongin, Jenny Skerratt, Cedric Robillot, Rachael Smith, Reinier Mann and Michael Warne TropWATER Report number 17/38 June 2017 Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier Reef Report prepared by Jon Brodie1, Mark Baird2, Jane Waterhouse1, Mathieu Mongin2, Jenny Skerratt2, Cedric Robillot3, Rachael Smith4, Reinier Mann4 and Michael Warne4,5 2017 1James Cook University, 2CSIRO, 3eReefs, 4Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, 5Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom EHP16055 – Update and add to the existing 2013 Scientific Consensus Statement to incorporate the most recent science and to support the 2017 update of the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Input and review of the development of the targets provided by John Bennett, Catherine Collier, Peter Doherty, Miles Furnas, Carol Honchin, Frederieke Kroon, Roger Shaw, Carl Mitchell and Nyssa Henry throughout the project. Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone: (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ Citation: Brodie, J., Baird, M., Waterhouse, J., Mongin, M., Skerratt, J., Robillot, C., Smith, R., Mann, R., Warne, M., 2017. Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Tablelands Agricultural Profile 2015
    Tablelands Agricultural Profile – 2015the title of your two-column fact Regional description high fertility. Soil profiles for these soils usually comprise a red, structured, high clay soil with an The Tablelands agricultural region, defined by the acid-neutral pH. boundaries of the Mareeba Shire Council and the Tablelands Regional Council, covers an area of Climate 65,000km². Most agricultural activity occurs on the elevated, eastern highlands extending from There is wide variation in climate across the Julatten southwards to Ravenshoe, and from Tablelands region, influenced by changes in Kuranda westwards to Dimbulah. The regional altitude and the proximity of the Great Dividing population of 47 000 is concentrated in the major Range. Elevated eastern and southern areas are centres of Mareeba, Atherton, Kuranda, Malanda, generally wetter and cooler, whereas western and Tolga, Yungaburra, Ravenshoe and Herberton; northern areas are hotter and drier. Winds from and the smaller centres of Chillagoe, Dimbulah, tropical cyclones are often of lower speed and are Millaa Millaa, Irvinebank, Julatten, Mt Garnet, Mt less damaging on the Tablelands than in adjacent Molloy Mutchilba and Walkamin. coastal regions. Industry diversity Table 1 – Climate of key Tablelands towns Tablelands agriculture includes a wide diversity of Annual Average temp. Altitude tropical and subtropical production of plant and Locality rainfall range (°C) animal industries. Forty-two large agricultural (m) (mm) industries were identified in the Tablelands region Jan. July in 2015. The success and resilience of the Kuranda 336 2002 24-31 17-26 Tablelands agriculture sector can be attributed to Mareeba 400 918 21-31 11-25 this industry diversity, which provides options to Dimbulah 407 783 22-34 11-27 farmers to change crops and farming systems to adapt to market cycles and consumer demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Framework December 2019 CS9570 12/19
    Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy Queensland bulk water opportunities statement Part A – Strategic framework December 2019 CS9570 12/19 Front cover image: Chinaman Creek Dam Back cover image: Copperlode Falls Dam © State of Queensland, 2019 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Hinze Dam Queensland bulk water opportunities statement Contents Figures, insets and tables .....................................................................iv 1. Introduction .............................................................................1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Context 1 1.3 Current scope 2 1.4 Objectives and principles 3 1.5 Objectives 3 1.6 Principles guiding Queensland Government investment 5 1.7 Summary of initiatives 9 2. Background and current considerations ....................................................11 2.1 History of bulk water in Queensland 11 2.2 Current policy environment 12 2.3 Planning complexity 13 2.4 Drivers of bulk water use 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings
    Fish Habitat Guideline FHG 001 FISH PASSAGE IN STREAMS Fisheries guidelines for design of stream crossings Elizabeth Cotterell August 1998 Fisheries Group DPI ISSN 1441-1652 Agdex 486/042 FHG 001 First published August 1998 Information contained in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. The Queensland Department of Primary Industries has taken all reasonable steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of publication. Readers should ensure that they make appropriate enquiries to determine whether new information is available on the particular subject matter. © The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries 1998 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Department of Primary Industries, Queensland. Enquiries should be addressed to: Manager Publishing Services Queensland Department of Primary Industries GPO Box 46 Brisbane QLD 4001 Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings BACKGROUND Introduction Fish move widely in rivers and creeks throughout Queensland and Australia. Fish movement is usually associated with reproduction, feeding, escaping predators or dispersing to new habitats. This occurs between marine and freshwater habitats, and wholly within freshwater. Obstacles to this movement, such as stream crossings, can severely deplete fish populations, including recreational and commercial species such as barramundi, mullet, Mary River cod, silver perch, golden perch, sooty grunter and Australian bass. Many Queensland streams are ephemeral (they may flow only during the wet season), and therefore crossings must be designed for both flood and drought conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Water Quality Guidelines 2009
    Queensland Water Quality Guidelines 2009 Prepared by: Environmental Policy and Planning, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection © State of Queensland, 2013. Re-published in July 2013 to reflect machinery-of-government changes, (departmental names, web addresses, accessing datasets), and updated reference sources. No changes have been made to water quality guidelines. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g.
    [Show full text]