Accepted for Publication Cultural Sociology 20 March 2018 Scandal and the Work of Art: The Nude in an Aesthetically Inflected Sociology of the Arts1 Victoria D. Alexander Goldsmiths, University of London and Anne E. Bowler University of Delaware Running Title: Scandal and the Work of Art Draft: Final Typescript, 27 February 2018 1 Corresponding author: Victoria D. Alexander, Institute for Creative and Cultural Entrepreneurship, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW,
[email protected]. The authors are listed in alphabetical order, having contributed equally to the writing of this paper. For his very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper, we thank Mark Jacobs along with the anonymous reviewers. We particularly wish to acknowledge Vera Zolberg, with whom we discussed this project, for the inspiration she has provided over the years. We dedicate this paper to her memory. 1 Scandal and the Work of Art: The Nude in an Aesthetically Inflected Sociology of the Arts ABSTRACT American sociologists working in the production perspective have produced a rich body of work on systems of aesthetic-cultural production, distribution, and consumption, but they have paid relatively little attention to the work of art. Aligning with new sociological work that takes the work of art seriously, this article contributes to an aesthetically inflected sociology of the arts: research that includes the work of art as an integral part of the analysis. Substantively, we examine a nineteenth-century scandal surrounding paintings of nudes. We show that the work of art constitutes crucial evidence for understanding arts scandals. Artworks are connected with social and aesthetic issues by means of their pictorial elements, which are viewed by a public through historically situated “period eyes.” Each of these elements is needed to spark an arts controversy, and all must be studied in order to understand them.