The Status and Distribution of the Prairie Warbler in Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Status and Distribution of the Prairie Warbler in Ontario 99 The Status and Distribution ofthe Prairie Warbler in Ontario by Anne B. Lambert and Roy B.H. Smith The Prairie Warbler (Dendroica islands), where over one hundred discolor) has been considered a have been recorded. There are also relatively rare breeding species in three fall records from Newfoundland Ontario, but one whose exact In Ontario, the Prairie Warbler status was rather poorly known. was first recorded in 1900 (Samuel This led the Nongame Program of 1900; Ames 1901) and was first the Ontario Ministry of Natural proved to breed in the province in Resources to commission a study 1922 (Harrington 1922). Histor­ of its status in Canada, and early ically, breeding has been in 1984 a report was prepared confirmed in ten Counties/ (Lambert and Smith 1984). The Districts (Lambton, Haldimand­ Status Report detailed information Norfolk, Waterloo, Dufferin, available up to 1983, based on the Bruce, Simcoe, Muskoka, Parry literature and communications Sound, Peterborough, Frontenac) with knowledgeable birders, while and suspected in six more this paper summarizes those data. (Middlesex, Manitoulin, Hastings, Additional information obtained Prince Edward, Leeds and during the 1984 season has also Grenville, Lanark). Presently, been included, when available. however, breeding occurs on a regular basis in only six Counties Overview or Districts (Lambton, Simcoe, In Canada, the Prairie Warbler Muskoka, Parry Sound, Peterbor­ has been reported in five provinces ough, and Frontenac). The main but has been proved to breed only stronghold ofthe Ontario in Ontario. It is a very rare spring population is concentrated along migrant in Quebec (7 or 8 the eastern shore of Georgian Bay records), and a rare but regular fall in the Districts ofMuskoka and migrant in New Brunswick and Parry Sound, with smaller Nova Scotia (mainly on offshore numbers in Frontenac and Anne B. Lambert and Roy B.H. Smith, Box 222, Port Rowan, Ontario NOE IMO VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3 100 : Georgian Bay breeding range • other regular breeding sites (current) • isolated breeding record • possible breeding sites o former breeding sites Figure 1. Breeding distribution of the Prairie Warbler in Ontario: 1900-1984. Peterborough (Fig. 1). In these is typically dominated by mature areas the population appears to be but stunted white pine (Pinus stablef although a slight increase strobus), white and red oak may have occurred in Frontenac. (Quercus alba, Q. rubra), and by However, in Simcoe and Lambton patches ofcommon juniper Counties substantial declines have (Juniperus communis var. depres­ been documented. sa). Prairie Warblers most frequently select these low junipers Breeding Habitats for nest sites (Lord 1955; D.A. At least three distinct habitat types Sutherland, pers. comm.). Recent­ have been occupied in Ontario, all ly, use of a similar habitat along characterized by open, scrubby some hydro line rights-of-way in vegetation and usually zeric Frontenac Co. has also been conditions. The most important reported (RD. Weir, pers. habitat is the pine-oak-juniper comm.). scrub found along the Georgian The second important Ontario Bay shoreline and at scattered ~abitat is a sand dune habitat locations along the southern edge exemplified by the Lake Huron ofthe Canadian Shield (e.g. in dunes at Pinery Provo Park Peterborough and Frontenac (Lambton Co.) and, formerly, at Counties). This open,- rocky Wasaga Beach (Simcoe Co.), once habitat (often only 50% vegetated) the site of a large'colony'. At the ONTARIO BIRDS DECEMBER 1984 101 Pinery, the 'interdunal meadows' were first recorded at Port Franks frequented by Prairie Warblers in 1915, and during the 1930s at comprise a fairly open habitat with least 26 singing males were noted "scattered mature black oak; low over an 8 km length ofdunes shrubs ofjuniper, fragrant sumac, (Saunders 1934, in litt.). At this wild grape, choke cherry and red density there could have been 50 cedar~alllow, vegetation with pairs or more in the entire area of clumping evident" (T. Crabe, pers. habitat between Ipperwash and comm.). A detailed description of Grand Bend. Indeed, after the this habitat has been provided by Royal Ontario Museum's collect­ Sparling (1965). ing trip to the area in 1935, Snyder In the Turkey Point/St. was said to have described the Williams area (Haldimand-Norfolk Prairie Warblers there as RM.), sandy plains with planted "positively abundant" (J.L. Baillie pines and!or deciduous scrub notes, ex ROM files). However, comprise a third habitat type. cottage development has probably This open, successional habitat contributed to a decline in the typically includes pin cherry population since the 1930s, and (Prunus pensylvanica), sapling within Pinery Provo Park the oaks (Quercus spp.) and other planting of pines on some deciduous species. The plantations secondary and tertiaiy dunes only remain suitable as nesting during the 1950s may have led to habitat for 10 to 20 years (A. some reduction in habitat (J.D. Wormington, pers. comm.), but McCauley, pers. comm.). In recent sequential plantings by the years, increasing visitor pressures Provincial Forestry Station have could also have had some effect provided a virtually continuous (T. Crabe, pers. comm.). supply of habitat since the early In 1969 the population was 1930s. Second growth deciduous estimated at 17-22 males (J. scrub is used much more LameY,fide T. Crabe, pers. frequently within the Prairie comm.), but since then there Warbler's United States range, the appears to have been a slow only other Ontario examples being decline. Figures for some a single case of breeding in intervening years are not available, Waterloo RM. in 1982 and one of but from 1977 onwards the possible breeding in Middlesex numbers of singing males were Co. in 1983. An instance of estimated as follows: 1977 - 10 to possible breeding has also been 20; 1978 - 11 +; 1979 - 7?; 1980­ recorded in old fields regenerating between 4 and 8, probably 6; 1981 to red cedar (Juniperus vir­ - between 6 and 8, probably 8; giniana) in Prince Edward Co. in 1982 - 5+; and 1983 - 5 (T. 1979. Crabe, pers. comm.; J.D. McCauley, pers. comm.). The Detailed Bre~ding Distribution present Pinery population seems to be stable at between 5 and 8 Lambton County. Prairie Warblers singing males, and the total VOLUME 2 NUMBER 3 102 population for the entire area that suitable habitat was between Grand Bend and Kettle disappearing (Goodwin and Point has been estimated at 10 Rosche 1971). Although complete pairs (T. Crabe, pers. comm.). counts or censuses were not conducted, the numbers involved Middlesex County. The Prairie were probably quite small. The Warbler has never been proved to highest recorded count of eight breed in Middlesex, but two singing males was made in 1972 summer records in the London (A. Wormington, pers. comm.), area in 1930 and 1931 raised the and the slow decline since that possibility that breeding might time can be attributed to the have occurred (Saunders and Dale increasing maturity of the pine 1933). More recently, a singing plantations. The last year in which male was observed in the'Skunk's singing males (2 or 3) were Misery' area, Mosa Twp. on 1, 4 recorded was 1979 (R.J. Curry, and 14 July 1983, again suggesting pers. comm.; C.J. Risley, pers. the possibility of breeding. This comm.), but in 1984 a pair and an bird was occupying a successional additional singing male were habitat described as a mixture of located by the authors at a site low pines, birch and aspen, near Turkey Point. Although interspersed with clearings (S. breeding was not confirmed, this Connop, pers. comm.). find suggests that the Prairie Warbler may yet persist as a Haldimand-Norfolk Regional breeding species in Haldimand­ Municipality. Published and Norfolk R.M. unpublished records indicate that in the early 1930s a small breeding Waterloo Regional Municipality. population was discovered in the There is a single, unprecedented Turkey Point-St. Williams area, in breeding record from 1982, when a pine plantations established by the nest with eggs was found near St. Williams Forestry Station. In Bamberg, Wilmot Twp. by R. 1936 a 'colony' of six males was Pickering (P.F.J. Eagles, pers. reported at Turkey Point by G.W. comm.). The habitat was described North (Toronto Ornithological as "second growth forest with Club records,per ROM files) and nesting Golden-winged Warblers breeding was confirmed on 15 July as well". 1942, when a nest with three young was found in South Walsingham (now Norfolk) Twp. Dufferin County. The single (F. North 1943, in. litt.). A small record concerns a nest with 5 eggs population persisted in the St. found on 11 June 1927 on Williams Forestry Station through Shrigley Creek, Melancthon Twp. the next few decades as phased by Dr. P. Harrington (Ontario plantings kept a supply of suitable Nest Record Scheme - hereafter habitat available for about 50 ONRS). The nest was located in years, but by 1971 it was noted juniper, but it is not known ONTARIO BIRDS DECEMBER 1984 103 whether appropriate habitat exists comm.) indicates that he located a in this area today. 'colony' of about 8 pairs in St. Edmunds Twp. in 1952. In 1953 Bruce County. Observations of he found a nest with young, but singing males suggest that breeding there were fewer breeding pairs, may have occurred at the following and in the following years the locations: near Cameron Lake, St. colony continued to decline, fInally Edmunds Twp. in 1905 (Saunders disappearing after 1958. 1906); at Colpoy's Bay, More recently, the late George Albemarle Twp. in 1908 and 1909 North is reported to have seen (Klugh 1909,1910); at McVicar, Prairie Warblers at Miller Lake St. Edmunds Twp. in 1928, 1930 Lindsay Twp. in the 1950s and' and 1934, at Stokes Bay, Eastnor 1960s (J.
Recommended publications
  • Consolidated Municipal Services Managers and Areas Served
    CONSOLIDATED MUNICIPAL SERVICES MANAGERS AND AREAS SERVED Consolidated Municipal Services Managers (CMSMs) in Southern Ontario provide a similar range of programs and services and also provide land ambulance and public health services with the approval of the Minister of Health. The role of the delivery agent in the provision of social services has progressed over time. The Local Services Realignment announced by the government in January 1997, outlined new directions for the delivery of social assistance, child care and social housing. These changes have created the opportunity to implement a more integrated system of social and community health services under municipal leadership. An integrated system is one in which policies; programs and services are coordinated and complementary and serve common goals that address the well being of individuals, families and communities. Consolidation of municipal service management has resulted in the management of the delivery of social assistance, child care, and social housing by 36 municipalities in Southern Ontario and by 10 District Social Services Administration Boards as well as the Regional Municipality of Sudbury in Northern Ontario. Authority to require consolidation of municipal service management is provided by the Services Improvement Act and the Social Assistance Reform Act. In Northern Ontario, ten District Social Services Administration Boards (DSSABs) and the Regional Municipality of Sudbury were approved as CMSMs. DSSABs are responsible for serving both municipalities and territories without municipal organization. The nine southern Ontario regional municipalities plus the City of Toronto are, by legislation, boards of health for their region, as well as CMSMs. [Please refer to attached chart outlining Consolidated Municipal Service Managers - Ontario Works, Child Care and Social Housing -- area served in Southern and Northern Ontario] 1 Consolidated Municipal Service Managers Ontario Works, Child Care and Social Housing Service Manager Area Served SOUTHERN ONTARIO 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Muskoka Vacation Experience 1860-1945 by Geoffrey
    The Evolving Muskoka Vacation Experience 1860-1945 by Geoffrey Shifflett A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 © Geoffrey Shifflett 2012 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This dissertation examines the development of tourism in Muskoka in the Canadian Shield region from 1860 to 1945. Three key themes are examined: the tourists, the resorts and projected image of the area. When taken together, they provide insight into the origin and evolution of the meanings attached to tourist destinations in the Canadian Shield. The Muskoka Lakes region provides the venue in which continuity and change in each of these elements of the tourism landscape are explored. This dissertation uses previously underutilized primary source materials ranging from hotel ledgers, financial reports, personal correspondence, period brochures, guidebooks, and contemporary newspaper articles to reconstruct the Muskoka tourist experience over an extended period of time. The volume of literature pertaining to American tourism history significantly outweighs similar work conducted on Canadian destinations. This dissertation, therefore, begins with an overview of key works related to the historical development of tourism in the United States followed by a survey of corresponding Canadian literature. The lack of an analytical structure in many tourist historical works is identified as a methodological gap in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • The Northeastern Ontario Recreation
    The Northeastern Ontario Recreation Association (NeORA), is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life, health and well- being of people and to promote the value and benefits of parks and recreation to the public in their environments throughout Northeastern Ontario. “Our goal is to keep recreation in Northeastern Ontario a priority!” The Northeastern Ontario Recreation Association, in collaboration with its many partners provides training and development; and acts as the representative voice for community sport, recreation and fitness organizations in Northeastern Ontario “Healthier Minds-Healthier Bodies- Healthier Communities” WHAT WE DO! District Hosting the Brokering Training based Annual Partner on Northern Conference Training needs Advocating-the Marketing/ Voice for Promoting the Recreation Networking including Benefits of volunteers Recreation Consulting- Local recognition Promote Provide of recreation Member Assistance to volunteers Benefits Municipalities NEORA’s COMMITMENT Partner with various Work with different levels of stakeholders in the delivery of government in representing training & development community sport, culture, opportunities for community recreation & fitness sport, culture, recreation & organizations. fitness organizations. Partner with the private sector in achieving self-sustainability in its delivery of services to its membership. Student $10 Individual/Community Volunteer $20 Community Group $30 BENEFITS FOR MEMBERS - Host training and workshops - Membership fee is embedded in the conference fee -Listing
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Algoma-Manitoulin Agricultural Impact Study
    Algoma - Manitoulin Agricultural Economic Sector Profile December 2009 Algoma - Manitoulin Agricultural Economic Sector Profile December 2009 Funded by: FedNor Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Northwestern Ontario Development Network Food Security Research Network Supported by: Ontario Federation of Agriculture Prepared by: Harry Cummings and Associates Inc. 96 Kathleen Street, Guelph Ontario. N1H 4Y3 Phone: (519) 823-1647 / Fax: (519) 821-0202 URL: www.hcaconsulting.ca Email: [email protected] ii Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to provide a profile of agriculture in the Algoma - Manitoulin region and an update on the economic impact of agriculture on the wider economy. The report is intended to help the broader community better understand the nature and economic significance of the agricultural economy in terms of dollars and jobs. The findings are also intended to inform program and policy development work within northern Ontario. Only by better understanding the important role played by food related activities can the various participants in the agri-food economy work together to make decisions which are economically sound, environmentally sustainable and socially responsible. The research in this report relies on data from the Population and Agricultural Census (1996-2006) and a review of the findings from the previous agri-economic impact study conducted in the region in 2002. The study was completed as part of a larger collaborative partnership between stakeholder groups in Thunder Bay District, Rainy River District, Kenora District and Cochrane District. The focus of this report is on the Algoma - Manitoulin region. The value of agricultural production in the Algoma - Manitoulin region is substantial.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Lake Muskoka
    A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Muskoka, and Lake of the Woods, Ontario, and Their U.S. Visitors Cobourg, Ontario (Photo by Marsha Ann Tate) Compiled by Marsha Ann Tate, PhD Tate Research & Training Services Email: [email protected] Originally compiled May 2007; Last updated July 5, 2014 A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Muskoka, and Lake of the Woods, Ontario, and Their U.S. Visitors Contents Introduction 3 Archives, Libraries, and Museums 4 Maps and Atlases 8 Photographs 9 Demographic Statistics 11 Government Documents 12 Theses 13 Books and Book Chapters 14 Journal, Magazine, and Newsletter Articles 22 Conference and Working Papers 29 Speech and Interview Transcripts 31 Newspaper Articles 32 Pamphlets, Brochures, and Advertisements 39 Web-based Resources 41 Page 2 A Selected Bibliography of Sources Related to Cobourg, Muskoka, and Lake of the Woods, Ontario, and Their U.S. Visitors Introduction The following is a selected bibliography of sources related to Cobourg, Rice Lake, Lake Muskoka, and the Lake of the Woods regions of Ontario, in addition to U.S. visitors to the respective areas. The time period covered by the sources ranges from the late eighteenth century through the first half of the twentieth century. Arrangement of Entries The bibliography is arranged into the following sections: (a) Archives, Libraries, and museums; (b) Maps and Atlases; (c) Photographs; (d) Population and Other Demographic Statistics; (e) Government Publications; (f) Theses; (g) Books and Book Chapters; (h) Maps and Atlases; (i) Journal, Magazine, and Newsletter Articles; (j) Conference and Working Papers; (k) Speech and Interview Transcripts; (l) Newspaper Articles; (m) Pamphlets, Brochures, and Advertisements; and (n) Web-based Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Invading Species Awareness Program for Ontario 2009
    2009/10 Invading Species Awareness Program for Ontario Annual Report for 2009/10 INVADING SPECIES AWARENESS PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Invading Species Awareness Program The Invading Species Awareness Program (ISAP) has been a joint partnership initiative of the O.F.A.H. and the MNR since 1992; focusing on preventing invasive species introductions to Ontario’s forests and waters. In 2009, in collaboration with hundreds of community groups, nongovernment organizations and all levels of government, the ISAP reached hundreds of thousands of Ontarians engaging their participation in prevention. Hundreds of citizen scientists and professional field staff from numerous agencies participated in our monitoring and reporting programs. The ISAP made valuable contributions to early detection and rapid response initiatives for invasive species threatening Ontario’s biodiversity such as Asian carp, kudzu, European water chestnut, and water soldier. 2009 marked the successful completion of a multi‐year provincial effort to train the bait industry to implement aquatic invasive species prevention plans throughout their industry. The ISAP made significant contributions to provincial, national and international initiatives including the Ontario Invasive Plant Council, the U.S. Great Lakes Panel on Aquatic Nuisance Species and the Canadian Aquatic Invasive Species Network, and the development of the bi‐national Lake Superior Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention Plan. Partnerships In 2009, the O.F.A.H. and the MNR continued the successful joint delivery of the ISAP, with O.F.A.H. staff working collaboratively with staff from MNR’s Biodiversity Section, as well as numerous district offices around the province. Federally, funding contributions were made from Environment Canada’s Invasive Alien Species Partnership Program, and the Lake Simcoe Clean Up Fund, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and Human Resources Development Canada’s Canada Summer Jobs Program and Eco‐Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Or Navy During the European War. an Application for 100 Acres of Land Under These Conditions May Be Sent Either to the Soldier Settlement Board of Canada at St
    658 ADMINISTRATION army or navy during the European War. An application for 100 acres of land under these conditions may be sent either to the Soldier Settlement Board of Canada at St. John, N.B., or to the Deputy Minister of Lands and Mines at Fredericton, N.B. In Quebec the area of public lands subdivided and unsold on June 30, 1919, was 6,330,751 acres. During the year ended June 30, 1920, 157,682 acres were surveyed; 120,761 acres reverted to the Crown and 87,216 acres were acquired through exchanges; 197,410 acres were sold, the receipts, including arrears, being $146,398. Adding to the acreage available at June 30, 1919, the areas surveyed and the areas that reverted and deducting sales and grants, there remained subdivided and unsold on June 30, 1920, 6,499,000 acres. Agricul­ tural lands in 100 acre lots are available for settlement upon prescribed conditions at the price of 60 cents per acre. In Ontario the public lands which are open for disposal are chiefly situated in the districts of Muskoka, Parry Sound, Nipissing, Sudbury, Algoma, Timiskaming, Thunder Bay, Kenora and Rainy River, and in the counties of Haliburton, Peterborough, Hastings, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington and Renfrew. In northern Ontario, which comprises the territory lying north and west of the Ottawa and French rivers, the townships open for sale are subdivided into lots of 320 acres, or sections of 640 acres, and a half lot or quarter section of 160 acres is allowed to each applicant at the price of 50 cents per acre, payable one-fourth cash and the balance in three annual instalments with interest at 6 p.c.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Parry Sound/Muskoka IRRP
    PARRY SOUND / MUSKOKA SUB-REGION INTEGRATED REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Part of the South Georgian Bay/Muskoka Planning Region | December 16, 2016 Integrated Regional Resource Plan Parry Sound/Muskoka This Integrated Regional Resource Plan (“IRRP”) was prepared by the Independent Electricity System Operator (“IESO”) pursuant to the terms of its Ontario Energy Board electricity licence, EI-2013-0066. This IRRP was prepared on behalf of the Parry Sound/Muskoka Sub-region Working Group (the “Working Group”), which included the following members: • Independent Electricity System Operator • Hydro One Networks Inc. (Distribution) • Hydro One Networks Inc. (Transmission) • Lakeland Power Distribution Ltd. • Midland Power Utility Corporation • Newmarket-Tay Power Distribution Ltd. • Orillia Power Distribution Corporation • PowerStream Inc. • Veridian Connections Inc. The Working Group assessed the reliability of electricity supply to customers in the Parry Sound/Muskoka Sub-region over a 20-year period; developed a flexible, comprehensive, integrated plan that considers opportunities for coordination in anticipation of potential demand growth scenarios and varying supply conditions in the Parry Sound/Muskoka Sub- region; and developed recommended actions, while maintaining flexibility in order to accommodate changes in key assumptions over time. The Working Group members agree with the IRRP’s recommendations and support implementation of the plan, subject to obtaining necessary regulatory approvals and appropriate community consultations. Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide
    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • CELEBRATING LOCAL AGRI-FOOD Local Food Week June 3 to 9
    CELEBRATING LOCAL AGRI-FOOD Local Food Week June 3 to 9 JUNE 2018 Grey County Economic Development | Made in Grey | MadeInGrey.ca CONTENTS Greetings from Grey.................... 2 Grey Continues to Grow.............. 4 Business Enterprise Centre........ 6 Hawks’ Nest................................. 8 Recolour Grey.............................. 10 Bluewater Angels........................ 11 OYAP........................................... 12 LaunchPad.................................. 15 The Blue Mountains.................... 16 Hanover....................................... 20 Bluewater Wood Alliance............ 23 West Grey.................................... 24 Southgate.................................... 27 Grey County Tourism.................. 32 GREETINGS FROM GREY! Owen Sound............................... 34 Grey County Summer Students 2018 Meaford....................................... 36 Grey Highlands........................... 38 Georgian College........................ 40 THE TIME IS NOW Excellence in Manufacturing Consortium.................................. 42 TO BE YOUNG IN GREY Local Agri-Food Feature............. 44 The sun is shining, the weather is warming, Grey is greening and our Boots on the Ground................... 56 summer students have arrived! Grey County is fortunate to welcome 2018 Top 10 Events.................... 58 summer students across almost all departments – from tourism and Contacts...................................... 59 economic development to transportation, human resources, information technology,
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Book & Atlas of Muskoka and Parry Sound Districts [Microform]
    /, {./ ,^4 k :a ^y, IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TA!?GET (MT.3) 1.0 '-1^ 12.5 "" Ilia " li£ illllO I.I i25 11.4 1.6 V] <^ /] ^;. # V .%. A \\ ^V o'^ / Photographic ^S- 33 WEST MAIN STREET Sciences WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 873-4503 Corporation CIHM/ICMH CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Collection de Series. microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques iV Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire original copy available for filming. Features of this qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details wOpy which may be bibliographically unique, de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du which may alter any of the images in the point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier reproduction, or which may significantly change une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une the usual method of filming, are checked below. modification dans la mithode normale de filmage sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. Coloured covers/ Coloured pages/ I I n Couverture de couleur Pages de couleur Covers damaged/ Pages damaged/ n Couverture endommagee Pages endommag^es Covers restored and/or laminated/ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaur^e et/ou pelliculde Pages restaurdes et/ou pellicul6es Cover title missing/ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Le litre de couverture manque V Pages d6color6es, tachetdes ou piqu^es Coloured maps/ Pages detached/ n Cartes g^ographiques en couleur D Pages d6tach6es Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ / Showthrough/ Encre de couleur (i.e.
    [Show full text]