DOCSLIB.ORG

Saharan Mustard Invasion History and Patterns of Spread

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IInnvvaassiionon HHiissttoorryy aanndd PPaatttteerrnnss ooff SSpprreadead bbyy SSaahaharraa MMuussttaarrdd ((BrBraassssiicaca ttouourrneneffoorrttiiii)) iinn SSououtthhwweesstteerrnn NNoorrtthh AmAmeerriicaca Matt Brooks U.S. Geological Survey, Western Region Western Ecological Research Center Las Vegas Field Station www.werc.usgs.gov Invasion History • Sahara mustard first appeared in the Coachella Valley of the northwestern Colorado Desert in the 1920’s • Subsequently spread: – East • through the Sonoran Desert of CA and AZ (during the mid-1900s?) • and on into NM and TX (when?) – West • into the interior cismontane valleys of southern CA (by mid-century, but only recently displaced other species as the dominant mustard in some places during the 1980s-1990s) – North • through the Mojave Desert of CA, NV, AZ, and UT (probably began during the early 1980s, but became dominant in some places by the late 1990s) • on into the Colorado Plateau of UT (around 2000) • and the southwestern Great Basin in Owens Valley of CA (probably by the late 1990s) – South • into Mexico (when did it get there?) Patterns of Spread •• SSahaaharraa mmuusstatarrdd isis ccuurrrrententllyy ababsseenntt ffrroomm mmoosstt wwililddllandand aarreaeass,, aallthoughthough ththiiss peperrsspepeccttivivee cchahanngedged sisigngniifficicantantllyy dudurriingng sspprriingng 2005.2005. •• WWheherree iitt doedoess ooccccuurr iitt isis oftenoften oonnlyly pprreessentent aallongong rroadoadsisidedess,, wwhhicichh hahass beenbeen iittss pprriimmaarryy pathpathwwaayy ofof sspprreeaad.d. MMaajjoorr PPooiinntt #1#1 •• SSahaaharraa mmuussttaarrdd ffiirsrstt aarrrriivveded iinn NNoorrtthh AmAmeerriiccaa dudurriinngg tthehe eaearrllyy 19190000s.s. •• ItItss bebeccaammee aa ssiigngniiffiiccaanntt mmananaagegemmenentt ccononcceerrnn dduurriingng tthehe llaattee 19801980ss,, andand eesspepecciiaallllyy dduurriingng tthehe eaearrllyy 20200000s.s. •• RRoadoadssiidedess aarree tthehe pprriimmaarryy papatthhwwaayy ooff sspprread.ead. SSahaaharraa MMuusstatarrdd InInvvaasisionon ofof PPaavveedd RoadRoadsisidesdes • A study to compare stem densities of Sahara mustard at various distances up to 1 mile from the edge of a paved arterial road. • This species was not 600 previously detected at this Roadside Distribution in ChemehueviValley site during plant surveys in 500 ) t Spring 1999 c 1977, 1979, 1982, 1988, or e s (Berry and Brook in prep) n 400 a r t / 1992. s R2=0.93 m e t 300 s • The 7-year period between d a e d ( 1992 and 1999 included two 200 y t i s n years of very high rainfall e D 100 (1995 and 1998) which 0 probably facilitated spread 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 away from the roadside. Distance from paved arterial road (miles) MMaajjoorr PPooiinntt #2#2 •• SSahaaharraa mmuussttaarrdd ccanan eessttabablliisshh aallongong papavveded rrooadadssiiddeess andand sspprreeadad upup ttoo 11 mmililee iinnttoo tthehe opopenen dedesseerrtt wwiitthhiinn 77 yyeeaars.rs. SaSahhaarraa MMuusstatarrdd IInvnvaassiionon ooff PaPavveedd RRooaaddssiiddeses A study to compare plant density, plant biomass, seed density, and seed biomass of Sahara mustard in beneath- canopy and interspace microhabitats along roadside berms compared to 20m off-road of major paved arterial roads. 2 sites with silty/rockysoils 1 site with sandy soils StStududyy SSiitteses Needles and Coachella sites Mohawk dunes site Silty/rocky soils Sandy soils Atypical of invaded areas Typical of invaded areas PPllantant PPrroduoduccttiionon ReRessponponssee toto PPaavveded RoadsRoads 25 Plant Density interspace beneath-canopy 20 15 2 m 5 2 . 0 / # 10 5 0 Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Coachella Valley Mohawk Dunes Needles Overall, plant density did not display any consistent trends between roadside and offroad areas PPllantant PPrroduoduccttiionon ReRessponponssee toto PPaavveded RoadsRoads 120 Plant Biomass 100 80 2 m 5 2 . 60 0 / g 40 20 0 Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Coachella Valley Mohawk Dunes Needles In contrast, plant biomass was significantly higher in roadsides than offroad areas, except at the sandy-soiled Mohawk dune site. MMaajjoorr PPooiinntt #3#3 •• PPaavveded rrooaaddss mmaayy hhaavvee ttheheiirr ggrreaeatteesstt eeffffeeccttss wwheherree ssooililss aarree ssiilltyty//rroocckkyy,, ccondondiittiiononss wwheherree SSahaaharraa mmuussttaarrdd mmaayy ootthheerrwwiissee hahavvee ddiiffffiiccuullttyy eessttabablilisshhiinng.g. PPllantant PPrroduoduccttiionon ReRessponponssee toto PPaavveded RoadsRoads Plant biomass was especially high in roadside interspaces. SSeedeed PPrroduoduccttiionon ReRessponponssee toto PPaavveded RoadsRoads 18000 Seed Density Seed Biomass interspace 25 16000 beneath-canopy 14000 20 12000 2 m 10000 2 5 15 2 m . 5 0 / 8000 2 . # 0 / g 6000 10 4000 5 2000 0 0 Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Offroad Roadside Coachella Valley Mohawk Dunes Needles Coachella Valley Mohawk Dunes Needles Seed density and biomass were both higher in roadside than offroad interspaces at the two sites with silty/rocky soils, due to their strong positive relationships with plant biomass (R2~0.90). Seed Density and biomass did not significantly differ between roadside and offroad areas at the site with sandy soils. MMaajjoorr PPooiinntt #4#4 •• PPaavveded rrooaaddss mmaayy ffaacciililittaattee tthhee sspprreadead ooff SSahaaharraa mmuussttaarrdd bbyy pprroommoottiingng ppllaanntt bbiioommaassss aandnd sseedeed pprrooduduccttiionon iinn iinntteersrspapaccees.s. •• IInntteersrspapacceess ccoommpprriissee aapppprrooxxiimmaatteellyy 8585--9900%% ooff mmoosstt crcreoeossoottebuebushsh scrscrubub llandandssccapeapess wwhhiicchh mmaayy oottheherrwwiissee bebe mmuucchh lleessss iinnvvaassiibblele.. SaSahhaarraa MMuusstatarrdd IInvnvaassiionon ooff DiDirrtt RRooaaddssiiddeses To evaluate the pattern of spread along dirt roads I measured plant density and biomass of Sahara mustard at various distances from roads with and without berms in areas of silty/rocky compared to areas of sandy soils. silty/rocky soil sandy soil Density and biomass of Sahara mustard along dirt roads with berms (dark grey bars) and without berms (light grey bars) silty/rocky soil sandy soil 20 20 15 15 ) 2 m / # ( y 10 10 t i s n e D 5 5 800 800 0 5 10 20 0 5 10 20 60 60 ) 2 m / g ( s 40 40 s a m o i B 20 20 0 0 0 5 10 20 0 5 10 20 Distance from Roadside (m) Distance from Roadside (m) distance from berm(m) 20 10 5 0 Sandy Soil Silty/Rocky Soil MMaajjoorr PPooiinntt #5#5 •• BBeermsrms aalloonngg ddiirrtt rroadoadss appappeeaarr ttoo hahavvee ttheheiirr ggrreaeatteesstt eeffffeeccttss onon ssililtyty//rroocckkyy ssooililss wwhheerree SSaahaharraa mmuussttaarrdd mmaayy oottheherrwwiissee hahavvee ddiiffffiiccuullttyy eessttabablilisshhiing.ng. •• TThehe deepedeeperr lloooosseerr ssooililss ttyyppiiccaall ooff rroadoadssiidede beberrmsms crcreaeattee llooccaalliizzeded ssooililss ccondondiittiiononss tthahatt SSahaaharraa mmuussttaarrdd pprreeffeers.rs. BBoorrrrooww PitPitss UUsseedd ffoorr RRooaadbdbeedd MMateaterrialialss CCaann bbee HaHavveennss ffoorr SaSahhaarraa MMuusstatardrd • These areas are often in close proximity to major paved roads which Sahara mustard can use as pathways to spread into new areas. • The roadbed materials collected from these sites inevitably contains Sahara mustard seeds which innoculate new sites where the materials are used. OtOthheerr DiDissttuurrbbeedd AArreaeass CCaann AlAlssoo BBee DDoommiinnateatedd bbyy SaSahhaarraa MMuusstatardrd OHV Open Areas Postfire Landscapes Preferentially establishing in motorcycle tracks EEphpheemmeerralal WWaasshheess FacilitaFacilitattee SSpprreeaadd AwAwaayy ffrroomm RRooaaddssiiddeess aanndd OtOthheerr DiDissttuurrbbeedd AArreaseas • Washes have deeper and sandier soil than the surrounding landscape, conditions that Sahara mustard prefers. MMaajjoorr PPooiinntt #6#6 •• MMononiittoorriingng ttoo dedetteecctt nneeww popupopullaattiioonnss ooff SSahaaharraa mmuuststaarrdd sshhoouulldd ffooccuuss onon rroaoaddssiiddeess,, wwaasshheess,, andand oottheherr ddiissttuurrbbeedd aarreeaas.s. RReceecenntt SSaahhaarraa mmuusstatarrdd DDoommiinnaannccee onon SShhallalloow/w/RRoocckkyy SSooililss onon HillHillssllopopeses • During spring 2005 Sahara mustard was found in significant stands on mid-slopes and mountaintops where it had not been previously observed. River Mountains, NV Calico Mountains, CA • These newly discovered populations occured in areas that could not be any more different than the deep sandy alluvial soils that Sahara mustard most frequently dominates. • Extremely high rainfall during winter 2004-2005 clearly led to the high biomass of these stands which must have established and were previously overlooked in previous years when rainfall was much lower. • Many of the hillslope patches are discontinuous with patches on alluvial soils in the valleys below. • It is currently unknown how these disjunct patches became established. • Extensive flocks of granivorous birds were observed foraging in these stands, and it may be that birds were the primary dispersal vectors. • It is unlikely that rodents were the dispersal vector. • Wind is another plausible dispersal vector, as plants often break off at the base and tumble across the landscape, disarticulating and spreading seeds in the process. MMaajjoorr PPooiinntt #7#7 •• SSuuiittababllee habhabiittaatt ffoorr SSahaaharraa mmuussttaarrdd mmaayy bebe mmoorree wwiiddeesspprreadead tthanhan pprreevviioouussllyy tthoughhought.t. TaTakkee HHoommee MMeessssaagesges •• SSahaaharraa mmuussttaarrdd hahass bebeeenn iinn ssououtthhwweesstteerrnn NNoorrtthh AmAmeerriiccaa ffoorr abouaboutt 8080 yyeaears.rs. •• ItIt hahass rreeccenenttllyy iinncrcreaeasseedd iittss rrangeange aanndd dodommiinnananccee ssiinnccee tthehe 19801980s.s. •• ItIt wwillill vveerryy lliikkeellyy eexxppandand iittss rraangenge aanndd dodommiinnananccee wwiitthhiinn tthehe rreeggiiononss iitt ccuurrrrenenttllyy ooccccupupiiees.s. •• ItIt iiss ununkknnoowwnn hhooww ffaarr iitt wwiillll sspprreadead ououttssiidede ooff tthehe hohott dedesseerrtt rregegiionons.s..
Recommended publications
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP

    California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP

    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
  • Winter Observations on the Colorado Desert

    Winter Observations on the Colorado Desert

    MAR., 1902. ( THE CONDOR 37 In some respects the Oregon song sparrow is a remarkable form. It is darker than the races north and south of its range, and duplicates in coloring the sooty song sparrow of the Sitkan District. The races along the coast seem thus to alternate light and dark. But whilephea is nearly identical with ru@a in color, it is conspicuously smaller, and the ranges of the two are separated by several hundred miles. The present form occupies a strip along the coast from the northern limit of the redwoods (?) or at least from Rogue River north to Yaquina. The specimens from Crescent City are probably migrants as the breeding birds seem nearer deonensis (tho not precisely typical). The area ofi intergradation between cdeonen- sis and phcza is probably small, extending perhaps from Crescent City to Chetco R. (northern limit of Sequoia sempervivens). Lack of specimens prevents the exact determination of the limits of$hcPa at the north. I am indebted to Mr. Robert Ridgway and to Dr. C. Hart Merriam forthe use of specimens and types in the collection of the National Museum and in that of the Biological Survey. Winter Observations on the Colorado Desert. IT. S. DAGGETT, PASADENA, CAL. ROM Oct. 27 to Nov. 16, 1901, I dead birds floating on its surface, was spent at the American Girl Gold the cyanide tanks, two in number, con- F Mining Co.s‘ camp, located in the taining a strong solution of cyanide of Cargo Murchacho Mts on the Colorado potassium. Birds that essayed to Desert, five and one-half miles north- quench their thirst at this fount top- east of Ogilby, Cal., and some sixteen pled over dead in an instant.
  • Birds of the California Desert

    Birds of the California Desert

    BIRDS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT A. Sidney England and William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. i INTRODUCTION i \ 1 The term, "California desert", as used herein, refers to a politically defined region, most of i which is included in the California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) designated by the Federal Land ; and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA). Of the 25 million acres in the CDCA, about one-half are i public lands, most of which are managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) according to the "980 P California Desert Conservation Area Plan mandated by FLPMA. The California desert encompasses those portions of the Great Basin Desert (east of the White and lnyo Mountains and A south of the California-Nevada border), the Mojave Desert, and the Colorado Desert which occur " within California; it does not include areas of riparian, aquatic, urban, and agricultural habitats . adjacent to the Colorado River. (Also see chapters on Geology by Norris and Bioclimatology by E3irdsI4 are the most conspicuous vertebrates found in the California deserts. Records exist for at least 425 species (Garrett and Dunn 1981) from 18 orders and 55 families. These counts far exceed those for mammals, reptiles, amphibians and fish, and they are similar to totals for the entire state -- 542 species from 20 orders and 65 families (Laudenslayer and Grenfell 1983). These figures may seem surprisingly similar considering the harsh, arid climates often believed characteristic of I desert environments. However, habiiats found in the California desert range from open water and h marshes at the Salton Sea to pinyon-juniper woodland and limber pinelbristlecone pine forests on a few mountain ranges.
  • North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave

    North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave

    North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave http://www.desertusa.com/desert.html In most modern classifications, the deserts of the United States and northern Mexico are grouped into four distinct categories. These distinctions are made on the basis of floristic composition and distribution -- the species of plants growing in a particular desert region. Plant communities, in turn, are determined by the geologic history of a region, the soil and mineral conditions, the elevation and the patterns of precipitation. Three of these deserts -- the Chihuahuan, the Sonoran and the Mojave -- are called "hot deserts," because of their high temperatures during the long summer and because the evolutionary affinities of their plant life are largely with the subtropical plant communities to the south. The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico. Great Basin Desert: The northern three-quarters of Nevada, western and southern Utah, to the southern third of Idaho and the southeastern corner of Oregon. According to some, it also includes small portions of western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming. Bordered on the south by the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. Mojave Desert: A portion of southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah and of eastern California, north of the Sonoran Desert. Sonoran Desert: A relatively small region of extreme south-central California and most of the southern half of Arizona, east to almost the New Mexico line.
  • Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex

    Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex

    Appendix J Cultural Setting - Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex Appendix J: Cultural Setting - Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex The following sections describe the cultural setting in and around the two refuges that constitute the Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge Complex (NWRC) - Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWR and Coachella Valley NWR. The cultural resources associated with these Refuges may include archaeological and historic sites, buildings, structures, and/or objects. Both the Imperial Valley and the Coachella Valley contain rich archaeological records. Some portions of the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWRC have previously been inventoried for cultural resources, while substantial additional areas have not yet been examined. Seventy-seven prehistoric and historic sites, features, or isolated finds have been documented on or within a 0.5- mile buffer of the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWR and Coachella Valley NWR. Cultural History The outline of Colorado Desert culture history largely follows a summary by Jerry Schaefer (2006). It is founded on the pioneering work of Malcolm J. Rogers in many parts of the Colorado and Sonoran deserts (Rogers 1939, Rogers 1945, Rogers 1966). Since then, several overviews and syntheses have been prepared, with each succeeding effort drawing on the previous studies and adding new data and interpretations (Crabtree 1981, Schaefer 1994a, Schaefer and Laylander 2007, Wallace 1962, Warren 1984, Wilke 1976). The information presented here was compiled by ASM Affiliates in 2009 for the Service as part of Cultural Resources Review for the Sonny Bono Salton Sea NWRC. Four successive periods, each with distinctive cultural patterns, may be defined for the prehistoric Colorado Desert, extending back in time over a period of at least 12,000 years.
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections

    Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections

    -&? SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 82. NUMBER 6 THE PAST CLIMATE OF THE NORTH POLAR REGION BY EDWARD W. BERRY The Johns Hopkins University (Publication 3061) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION APRIL 9, 1930 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 82, NUMBER 6 THE PAST CLIMATE OF THE NORTH POLAR REGION BY EDWARD W. BERRY The Johns Hopkins University Publication 306i i CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION APRIL 9, 1930 ZU £or& (gafttmore (prees BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. THE PAST CLIMATE OF THE NORTH POLAR REGION 1 By EDWARD W. BERRY THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY The plants, coal beds, hairy mammoth and woolly rhinoceros ; the corals, ammonites and the host of other marine organisms, chiefly invertebrate but including ichthyosaurs and other saurians, that have been discovered beneath the snow and ice of boreal lands have always made a most powerful appeal to the imagination of explorers and geologists. We forget entirely the modern whales, reindeer, musk ox, polar bear, and abundant Arctic marine life, and remember only the seemingly great contrast between the present and this subjective past. Nowhere on the earth is there such an apparent contrast between the present and geologic climates as in the polar regions and the mental pictures which have been aroused and the theories by means of which it has been sought to explain the fancied conditions of the past are all, at least in large part, highly imaginary. Occasionally a student like Nathorst (1911) has refused to be carried away by his imagination and has called to mind the mar- velously rich life of the present day Arctic seas, but for the most part those who have speculated on former climates have entirely ignored the results of Arctic oceanography.
  • A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands Common Lichens and Bryophytes

    A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands Common Lichens and Bryophytes

    A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands Common Lichens and Bryophytes Roger Rosentreter Matthew Bowker Jayne Belnap Photographs by Stephen Sharnoff Roger Rosentreter, Ph.D. Bureau of Land Management Idaho State Office 1387 S. Vinnell Way Boise, ID 83709 Matthew Bowker, Ph.D. Center for Environmental Science and Education Northern Arizona University Box 5694 Flagstaff, AZ 86011 Jayne Belnap, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Canyonlands Research Station 2290 S. West Resource Blvd. Moab, UT 84532 Design and layout by Tina M. Kister, U.S. Geological Survey, Canyonlands Research Station, 2290 S. West Resource Blvd., Moab, UT 84532 All photos, unless otherwise indicated, copyright © 2007 Stephen Sharnoff, Ste- phen Sharnoff Photography, 2709 10th St., Unit E, Berkeley, CA 94710-2608, www.sharnoffphotos.com/. Rosentreter, R., M. Bowker, and J. Belnap. 2007. A Field Guide to Biological Soil Crusts of Western U.S. Drylands. U.S. Government Printing Office, Denver, Colorado. Cover photos: Biological soil crust in Canyonlands National Park, Utah, cour- tesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... 4 How to use this guide .................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................... 4 Crust composition ..................................................................................
  • Southern Exposures

    Southern Exposures

    Searching for the Pliocene: Southern Exposures Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center The 2012 Desert Research Symposium April 2012 Table of contents Searching for the Pliocene: Field trip guide to the southern exposures Field trip day 1 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Robert E. Reynolds, editor Field trip day 2 �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19 George T. Jefferson, David Lynch, L. K. Murray, and R. E. Reynolds Basin thickness variations at the junction of the Eastern California Shear Zone and the San Bernardino Mountains, California: how thick could the Pliocene section be? ��������������������������������������������������������������� 31 Victoria Langenheim, Tammy L. Surko, Phillip A. Armstrong, Jonathan C. Matti The morphology and anatomy of a Miocene long-runout landslide, Old Dad Mountain, California: implications for rock avalanche mechanics �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 38 Kim M. Bishop The discovery of the California Blue Mine ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 44 Rick Kennedy Geomorphic evolution of the Morongo Valley, California ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 45 Frank Jordan, Jr. New records
  • Geography of Coachella Valley Curriculum Guide

    Geography of Coachella Valley Curriculum Guide

    Exploring the Geography of Coachella Valley A Curriculum Guide for Grade 3, Standard 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Table of Contents 1 Unit Overview 2 Common Core State Standards: Reading Standards for Information Text 2 Academic History-Social Science Content Standards for Grade 3 2 Kindergarten to Grade 5 Historical and Social Sciences Analysis Skills 3 Focus Questions and Assessment 3 Geography of the Coachella Valley – Background Information for the Teacher 4 Supplies Needed 6 Lesson 1: Location Match-Up 8 Lesson 2: Looking at Earth 11 Lesson 3: Where I Live 14 Lesson 4: Geographic Terms and Definitions 16 Lesson 5: Right Here in the Coachella Valley 20 Lesson 6: Geographical Features of Coachella Valley 24 Lesson 7: Human-Made Features of Coachella Valley 29 Lesson 8: Communityville 31 Extended Activities 39 Unit 3.1 Exploring the Geography of Coachella Valley Page 1 Unit Overview: Exploring the Geography of Coachella Valley __________________________________________________________________________________ Description of the Unit The unit begins with Matching Vocabulary Cards that help students learn the name of their city, county, state, nation, continent, hemisphere, and planet. In Lesson 2, students use a variety of maps to find these geographic locations while in Lesson 3 they construct a “Flip-Book” titled “Where I Live.” In Lessons 4 and 5, students study geographic terms and definitions and use local maps to identify key geographical features in the Coachella Valley. In Lessons 5 and 6, students construct a map of the Coachella Valley and identify key geographical features and human-made features. The focus in Lesson 8 is on how the natural environment of “Communityville” has been changed over time.
  • Community-Based Restoration of Desert Wetlands: the Case of the Colorado River Delta1

    Community-Based Restoration of Desert Wetlands: the Case of the Colorado River Delta1

    Community-Based Restoration of Desert Wetlands: The Case of the Colorado River Delta1 Osvel Hinojosa-Huerta,2 Mark Briggs,3 Yamilett Carrillo-Guerrero,2 Edward P. Glenn,4 Miriam Lara-Flores,5 and Martha Román-Rodríguez6 ________________________________________ Abstract Wetland areas have been drastically reduced through (Rosenberg et al. 1991, Davis and Ogden 1994, the Pacific Flyway and the Sonoran Desert, with severe DeGraff and Rappole 1995). Causes for these declines consequences for avian populations. In the Colorado are related to the dramatic rate at which wetlands have River delta, wetlands have been reduced by 80 percent been destroyed in North America (Dahl 1990, National due to water management practices in the Colorado Research Council 1995), diminishing the area and River basin. However, excess flows and agricultural quality of breeding grounds, wintering areas, and mi- drainage water has restored some areas, providing gratory stopover habitat (Weller 1999). In western habitat for several sensitive species such as the Yuma North America, the patterns are shocking: wetland loss Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris yumanensis). This has in the California Central Valley is estimated at 95 sparked community interest to explore different scenar- percent (Zedler 1988), and loss along the U.S. Pacific ios for the restoration of bird habitat. Three community- coast has been 50 percent (Helmers 1992). based restoration projects are currently underway in the delta, focusing on the restoration of marshlands, This trend has been particularly critical in the Sonoran riparian stands, and mesquite bosque. The goal of these Desert, where the struggle for water between human projects is to reestablish the ecological functions of the uses and the environment has dried up most of the Colorado River delta, through an efficient use of riparian forests and wetlands (Brown 1985).
  • Deserts Province

    Deserts Province

    Province-Specific Conservation Strategies – Deserts 5.6 Deserts Province 5.6.1 Geophysical and Ecological Description of the Province The Deserts Province extends from the California-Mexico border on the south and Colorado River on the southeast north to Topaz Lake on the California-Nevada border (Figure 5.6-1). The province’s western border is formed by the Peninsula Mountain Ranges and Transverse Mountain Range in southern California, and the Sierra Nevada in central California. The province is the extension of desert regions located to the east and south of California in the states of Nevada and Arizona, and in Mexico. The Deserts Province has five different subregions: from north to south these are the Mono subregion, the Southeastern Great Basin, Mojave Desert, Sonoran Desert, and Colorado Desert. Each subregion has unique combinations of climate, topography, ecology, and land-use patterns. The province as a whole is in the rain shadow of mountain ranges that form the western border. The dry landscape created by this barrier is characterized by unique geologic features composed of cliffs, peaks, canyons, dry washes, sand dunes, and large dry lake playas. Elevations are generally low in the southern portion of the province and rise to the north. The elevation in the south (Sonoran and Colorado deserts subregion) is generally below 1,000 feet with the lowest point at 275 feet below sea level in the Salton Trough. The topography of the more northerly portion of the province (Mojave Desert subregion) is characterized by a moderately high plateau: elevations range from 282 feet below sea level in Death Valley to 11,000 feet above sea level in the Panamint Mountains.
  • Settler Colonialism and Carceral Occupation of the Jordan River

    Settler Colonialism and Carceral Occupation of the Jordan River

    RETELLING NARRATIVES OF ECO-MEMORY: SETTLER COLONIALISM AND CARCERAL OCCUPATION OF THE JORDAN RIVER By Megan Rose Awwad A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Social Science: Environment and Community Committee Membership Dr. Cutcha Risling Baldy, Committee Chair Dr. Janelle Adsit, Committee Member Dr. Nicholas Perdue Committee Member Dr. Rosamel Benavides-Garb, Graduate Program Coordinator December 2020 ABSTRACT RETELLING NARRATIVES OF ECO-MEMORY: SETTLER COLONIALISM AND CARCERAL OCCUPATION OF THE JORDAN RIVER Megan Awwad In this thesis, I retell and reclaim stories that have been shared and passed down within my family and family history in relation to our homeland, Palestine, and more specifically to the Jordan River. I argue that the construction of the dam in the 1960s on the Jordan River, by a zionist state, is an extension of both the settler colonial state and the treatment of the land/rivers as inherently linked with the treatment of Indigenous people. The carceral spaces and geographies settler states create are part of both the destruction of the land and the genocide Indigenous people experience. The Jordan River is a sacred site that was once a natural border and has now become a militarized border. As the colonization of the River takes place, the stories, and memories shift. The river becomes an important examination of settler colonialism and the expansion of a Zionist state and occupation of Palestine. Migration between Jordan and Palestine was a part of Indigenous Palestinians and Jordanians daily experiences prior to existences of modern states.