Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2006 Version

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) �– 2006 Version Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2006 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Furtherinformation and guidance in support of Ramsarsite designations are provided in the Strategic Framework for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (RamsarWise Use Handbook 7, 2 nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3 rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . Zoltán Hegyi Ph.D. (zoological supervisor) DD MM YY László Nagy (rangerof Ócsa Landscape Protection Area) Katalin Sipos (head of Nature Protection Department) Duna-Ipoly National Park Directorate H-1021 Budapest, Hővösvölgyi út 52., Hungary Designation date Site Reference Number Post address: 1525 Budapest, Pf.: 86. Phone: (36-1) 200-4033, 200-4066 Fax: (36-1) 200-1168 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: December, 2006 3. Country: Hungary 4. Name of the Ramsar site: The precise name of the designated site in one of the three official languages (English, French orSpanish) of the Convention. Alternative names, including in local language(s), should be given in parentheses afterthe precise name. Ócsai Turjános 5. Designation of new Ramsar site or update of existing site: This RIS is for (tick one box only) : a) Designation of a new Ramsar site ; or b) Updated information on an existing Ramsar site Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 2 6. For RIS updates only, changes to the site since its designation or earlier update: a) Site boundary and area The Ramsar site boundary and site area are unchanged: or If the site boundary has changed: i) the boundary has been delineated more accurately ; or i) the boundary has been extended ; or iii) the boundary has been restricted** and/or If the site area has changed: i) the area has been measured more accurately ; or ii) the area has been extended ; or iii) the area has been reduced** ** Important note: If the boundary and/orarea of the designated site is being restricted/reduced, the Contracting Party should have followed the procedures established by the Conference of the Parties in the Annex to COP9 Resolution IX.6 and provided a report in line with paragraph 28 of that Annex, priorto the submission of an updated RIS. b) Describe briefly any major changes to the ecological character of the Ramsar site, including in the application of the Criteria, since the previous RIS for the site: No significant change to the site since the last update. 7. Map of site: Referto Annex III of the Explanatory Note and Guidelines , fordetailed guidance on provision of suitable maps, including digital maps. a) A map of the site, with clearly delineated boundaries, is included as: i) a hard copy (required forinclusion of site in the RamsarList): ; ii ) an electronic format (e.g. a JPEG orArcView image) ; iii) a GIS file providing geo-referenced site boundary vectors and attribute tables ; b) Describe briefly the type of boundary delineation applied: e.g. the boundary is the same as an existing protected area (nature reserve, national park etc.), orfollows a catchment boundary, orfollows a geopolitical boundary such as a local government jurisdiction, follows physical boundaries such as roads, follows the shoreline of a waterbody, etc. The site boundary follows physical boundaries (road, canal), as well as boundaries of land registration plots. 8. Geographical coordinates (latitude/longitude, in degrees and minutes): Provide the coordinates of the approximate centre of the site and/orthe limits of the site. If the site is composed of more than one separate area, provide coordinates foreach of these areas. N border: 47 ° 13’ 15 ″ S border: 47 ° 18’ 05 ″ E border 19 ° 11’ 10 ″ W border 19 ° 18’ 35 ″ Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 3 Approximate Center of the wetland : 47 ° 15’ 60 ″ 19 ° 14’ 73 ″ 9. General location: Include in which part of the country and which large administrative region(s) the site lies and the location of the nearest large town. In the center of Hungary, Pest county, 28-40 km South-West of Budapest, near the villages Ocsa, Dabas and Inárcs. 10. Elevation: (in metres: average and/or maximum & minimum) 98-110 m above sea level 11. Area: (in hectares) 1078 ha 12. General overview of the site: Provide a short paragraph giving a summary description of the principal ecological characteristics and importance of the wetland. The area is a remnant of the ancient Danube valley having survived in small spots for today. The so called ,bog fen’ which has various habitats and wonderful landscape sight, gives home for several rare and strictly protected plant and animal species, and plays significant part in the migration of birds. The surrounding villages are rich in architectural and other cultural values, therefore this territory is one of the best targets for sustainable ecotourism. The wide variety of bird species gives the opportunity to organize bird migration research, which has a serious past of more than two decades in the district. On the other hand Ócsa is called the ‘botanists paradise’. 13. Ramsar Criteria: Tick the box undereach Criterion applied to the designation of the Ramsarsite. See Annex II of the Explanatory Notes and Guidelines forthe Criteria and guidelines fortheirapplication (adopted by Resolution VII.11). All Criteria which apply should be ticked. 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 8 • 9 14. Justification for the application of each Criterion listed in 13 above: Provide justification foreach Criterion in turn, clearly identifying to which Criterion the justification applies (see Annex II for guidance on acceptable forms of justification). 1.: In biographic region this wetland contains rare and unique natural wetland types: permanent freshwater marshes and peatswamp forests. In the beginning of the last century these wetland types were much larger than nowadays. Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 4 Habitat types from the Habitats Directive Annex I: 6410 Molinia meadows on calcareous, peaty or clayey-silt-laden soils ( Molinioncaeruleae ), 6440 Alluvial meadows of river valleys of the Cnidion dubii , 6510 Lowland hay meadows ( Alopecurus pratensis , Sanguisorba officinalis ), 7230 Alkaline fens as well as the both priority types 91E0 Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior (Alno-Padion,Alnion incanae, Salicion albae ) and 91I0 Euro-Siberian steppic woods with Quercus spp. 2.: This wetland supports critically endangered species of plants and animals. For example the protected Viviparous Lizard ( Zoothoca vivipara ) ( LR/lc IUCN Red list + Annex IV Habitats Directive ) is a characteristic threatened reptile species, which is genetically different from other populations in Hungary (or elsewhere). The site is the last Hungarian refuge of False Ringlet (Coenonympha oedippus ), which has a viable population in several locations scattered within the site. The species is threatened throughout Europe. Adenophora ( Adenophora liliifolia ), a European/Western Siberian subcontinental species, declining in its European range, has one of its last Hungarian strongholds here. (Annex provides full list of animal species) 3.: This wetland has an important role for maintaining the biological diversity of the biogeographic region. The local population of Viviparous Lizard ( Lacerta vivipara ) is genetically different from other populations in Hungary (or elsewhere). This is the only site for Coenonympha oedippus in Hungary and one of the very few sites for Adenophora liliifolia . The strong populations of European Mud- minnow ( Umbra krameri ) and Weatherfish ( Misgurnus fossilis ) are also important for maintaining biological diversity. 4.: This area supports plants of marshes and bogs and different species of birds associated to marshes. The vegetation period and the breeding season are connected mainly to seasonally and annually varying water conditions. Important breeding bird species: Ardea cinerea, Ardea purpurea (4-6 pairs) Botaurus stellaris (15-20 pairs), Egretta alba (up to 100 pairs), Egretta garzetta (occasionally), Platalea leucorodia (occasionally), Nycticorax nycticorax (occasionally), Aythya nyroca (10-15 pairs), Circus aeruginosus, Circus pygargus (3-4 pairs), Porzana porzana, Porzana parva, Rallus aquaticus, Crex crex, Numenius arquata, Limosa limosa, Tringa tetanus, Vanellus vanellus, Acrocephalus melanopogon. Important wintering bird species: Circus cyaneus, Asio flammeus. 15. Biogeography (required when Criteria 1 and/or3 and /orcertain applications of Criterion 2 are applied to the designation): Name the relevant biogeographic region that includes the Ramsarsite, and identify the biogeographic
Recommended publications
  • IN BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA June 2008
    RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA June 2008 RESULTS FROM THE EU BIODIVERSITY STANDARDS SCIENTIFIC COORDINATION GROUP (HD WG) IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 30th June 2008 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON BIH.................................................................. 5 3 IDENTIFIED SOURCES OF INFORMATION ............................................................. 8 3-a Relevant institutions.......................................................................................................................................8 3-b Experts.............................................................................................................................................................9 3-c Relevant scientific publications ...................................................................................................................10 3-c-i) Birds...........................................................................................................................................................10 3-c-ii) Fish ........................................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iii) Mammals ...............................................................................................................................................12 3-c-iv)
    [Show full text]
  • Participants List Final Conference
    SANTE Final Conference, Prague, Czech Republik, 18. - 20.3.2011 - Participants list First name: Surname: E-mail address: Organisation: Country: Galina Gorbatenkova [email protected] LTSA Latvia Kestutis Levickis [email protected] NEMUNAS Lithuania Anders Tharsgaard [email protected] ISCA Denmark Jacob Schouenborg [email protected] ISCA Denmark Saska Benedicic Tomat [email protected] ISCA Slovenia Antonio Borgogni [email protected] University of Cassino Italy Anders Kragh Jespersen [email protected] DGI Denmark Anna Streber [email protected] ISCA Germany Millar Stoddart [email protected] SALSC Scotland Eloisa Lorente [email protected] University of Bedfordshire, Uk Spain Giovanni Capelli [email protected] University of Cassino Italy Rosa Pasqualina De Vincenco [email protected] University of Cassino Italy Simone Digennaro [email protected] University of Cassino Italy Borislav Obradovic [email protected] University of Novi Sad Serbia Toni Llop [email protected] UBAE Spain Antonio Saccone [email protected] UISP Italy Jean Claude Besnard [email protected] UFOLEP France First name: Surname: E-mail address: Organisation: Country: Benedictas Siliunas [email protected] NEMUNAS Lithuania David Laing [email protected] SALSC Scotland Sami Kokko [email protected] University of Jyvaskyla Finland Artan Shytaj [email protected] University of Tirana Albania Aivars Kaupuzs [email protected] LTSA Latvia Silvia Crevels [email protected] NSA, Nederlandse Sport Alliantie Netherland Miroslav Zitko [email protected] CASPV Czech Republic Steen Bille [email protected] DGI Denmark Vlasta Syslova [email protected] CASPV Czech Republic Jitka Hozakova [email protected] CASPV Czech Republic Jana Havrdova [email protected] Czech Aerobic/Fitness/Dance A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Distribution of Freshwater Fish Endemic to the Mediterranean Basin
    IUCN – The Species Survival Commission The Status and Distribution of The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of 8,000 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation Freshwater Fish Endemic to the and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. Mediterranean Basin www.iucn.org/themes/ssc Compiled and edited by Kevin G. Smith and William R.T. Darwall IUCN – Freshwater Biodiversity Programme The IUCN Freshwater Biodiversity Assessment Programme was set up in 2001 in response to the rapidly declining status of freshwater habitats and their species. Its mission is to provide information for the conservation and sustainable management of freshwater biodiversity. www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/programs/freshwater IUCN – Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation The Centre was opened in October 2001 and is located in the offices of the Parque Tecnologico de Andalucia near Malaga. IUCN has over 172 members in the Mediterranean region, including 15 governments. Its mission is to influence, encourage and assist Mediterranean societies to conserve and use sustainably the natural resources of the region and work with IUCN members and cooperate with all other agencies that share the objectives of the IUCN. www.iucn.org/places/medoffice Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Switzerland Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0002 E-mail: [email protected] www.iucn.org IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM – Mediterranean Regional Assessment No.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishfriendly Innovative Technologies for Hydropower D1.1 Metadata
    Ref. Ares(2017)5306028 - 30/10/2017 Fishfriendly Innovative Technologies for Hydropower Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union D1.1 Metadata overview on fish response to disturbance Project Acronym FIThydro Project ID 727830 Work package 1 Deliverable Coordinator Christian Wolter Author(s) Ruben van Treeck (IGB), Jeroen Van Wich- elen (INBO), Johan Coeck (INBO), Lore Vandamme (INBO), Christian Wolter (IGB) Deliverable Lead beneficiary INBO, IGB Dissemination Level Public Delivery Date 31 October 2017 Actual Delivery Date 30 October 2017 Acknowledgement This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and inno- vation program under grant agreement No 727830. Executive Summary Aim Environmental assessment of hydropower facilities commonly includes means of fish assem- blage impact metrics, as e.g. injuries or mortality. However, this hardly allows for conclusion at the population or community level. To overcome this significant knowledge gap and to enable more efficient assessments, this task aimed in developing a fish species classification system according to their species-specific sensitivity against mortality. As one result, most sensitive fish species were identified as suitable candidates for in depth population effects and impact studies. Another objective was providing the biological and autecological baseline for developing a fish population hazard index for the European fish fauna. Methods The literature has been extensively reviewed and analysed for life history traits of fish providing resilience against and recovery from natural disturbances. The concept behind is that species used to cope with high natural mortality have evolved buffer mechanisms against, which might also foster recovery from human induced disturbances.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use and Population Structure of Protected Butterflies
    DE TTK 1949 HABITAT USE AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF PROTECTED BUTTERFLIES VÉDETT NAPPALI LEPKÉK ÉLŐHELYHASZNÁLATA ÉS POPULÁCIÓSZERKEZETE Egyetemi doktori (PhD) értekezés ÖRVÖSSY NOÉMI témavezető DR. VARGA ZOLTÁN DEBRECENI EGYETEM Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2014. Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem természettudományi doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2014. december 10. Örvössy Noémi Tanúsítom, hogy Örvössy Noémi doktorjelölt 2004- 2014 között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javasolom. Debrecen, 2014. december 10. Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán HABITAT USE AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF PROTECTED BUTTERFLIES Értekezés a doktori (Ph.D.) fokozat megszerzése érdekében a biológia. tudományágban Írta: Örvössy Noémi okleveles biológus Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Juhász-Nagy Pál doktori iskolája (Biodiverzitás programja) keretében Témavezető: Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori szigorlati bizottság: elnök: Dr. Pócsi István ....................................................... tagok: Dr. Rózsa Lajos ....................................................... Dr. Földvári Mihály ....................................................... A doktori szigorlat időpontja: 2013. február
    [Show full text]
  • Faa 119 Biodiversity Analysis
    , MOLDOVA FAA 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS February 2007 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared1 by DevTech Systems, Inc. under an EPIQ II subcontract to PA Government Services, Inc. This page left intentionally blank MOLDOVA FAA 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS February 2007 Prepared by DevTech Systems, Inc. under an EPIQ II subcontract to PA Government Services, Inc. Contract # EPP-I-00-03-00015-00, subcontract # EPP3R015-4S-003, Task Order 3. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government Cover photo credits: Jeff Ploetz, Steve Nelson, Aureliu Overcenco This page left intentionally blank TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................III PREFACE ........................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... VI SECTION I: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ......................................................1 SECTION II: THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY .....................................................................3 A. The Importance of Biodiversity...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in the Morphology of the Wings of the Endangered Grass-Feeding Butterfl Y Coenonympha Oedippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Response to Contrasting Habitats
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 115: 339–353, 2018 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2018.034 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Variation in the morphology of the wings of the endangered grass-feeding butterfl y Coenonympha oedippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in response to contrasting habitats JURE JUGOVIC 1, SARA ZUPAN 1, ELENA BUŽAN 1 and TATJANA ČELIK 2, * 1 Department of Biodiversity, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, 6000 Koper, Slovenia; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Novi trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, butterfl y, Coenonympha oedippus, False Ringlet, wing, adaptation, classical morphometrics, geometric morphometrics, environmental heterogeneity Abstract. At the southern limit of its range the endangered butterfl y Coenonympha oedippus inhabits grasslands (wet, dry) that differ signifi cantly in the abundance of its larval hostplants (wet > dry) and mean annual air temperature (wet < dry). We deter- mined the difference in the wing morphology of individuals in the two contrasting habitats to test whether and how traits associated with wing size, shape and eye like spots vary in the sexes and two ecotypes. We show that sexual dimorphism follows the same (wing size and shape, number of eyespots on forewing) or different (relative area of eyespots on hindwings) patterns in the two contrasting habitats. Irrespective of ecotype, females had larger, longer and narrower wings, and more forewing eyespots than males. Sexual dimorphism in the relative area of eyespots on hindwing was female-biased in the wet, but male-biased in the dry ecotype.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Eier Heimischer Fische 24. Zingel – Zingel Zingel (Linnaeus, 1758) (Percidae)
    ©Österr. Fischereiverband u. Bundesamt f. Wasserwirtschaft, download unter www.zobodat.at Museth, J., R. Borgstrom, J. E. Brittain, I. Herberg und C. Naalsund (2002): Introduction of the European minnow into a subalpine lake: habitat use and long-term changes in population dynamics. Journal of Fish Biology 60: 1308– 1321. Muus, B. J. und P. Dahlström (1993): Süßwasserfische Europas – Biologie, Fang, wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft, München, 224 S. Nunn, A. D., J. P. Harvey und I. G. Cowx (2007): Variations in the spawning periodicity of eight fish species in three English lowland rivers over a 6 year period, inferred from 0+ year fish length distributions. Journal of Fish Bio- logy 70: 1254–1267. Riehl, R. (1979): Ein erweiterter und verbesserter Bestimmungsschlüssel für die Eier deutscher Süßwasser-Teleosteer. Zeitschrift für angewandte Zoologie 2: 199–216. Riehl, R. (1991): Die Struktur der Oocyten und Eihüllen oviparer Knochenfische – eine Übersicht. Acta Biologica Benrodis 3: 27–65. Riehl, R. (1996): Ein ganz besonderes »Loch« in der Eihülle von Knochenfischen – die Mikropyle. Aquatica 1: 122– 123. Riehl, R. und E. Schulte (1977): Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an den Eihüllen der Elritze Phoxinus phoxinus (L.) (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Protoplasma 92: 147–162. Riehl, R. und R. A. Patzner (1998): Minireview: The modes of attachment in the eggs of teleost fishes. Italian Jour- nal of Zoology 65 (suppl. 1): 415–420. Schadt, J. (1993): Fische, Neunaugen, Krebse und Muscheln in Oberfranken. Bezirk Oberfranken, Bayreuth, 136 S. Schneider, G. und K. M. Levander (1900): Ichthyologische Beiträge. I. Notizen über die an der Südküste Finnlands in den Schären des Kirchspieles Esbo vorkommenden Fische.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    BULGARIA Nick Greatorex-Davies. European Butterflies Group Contact ([email protected]) Local Contact Prof. Stoyan Beshkov. ([email protected]) National Museum of Natural History (NMNH), Sofia, Butterfly Conservation Europe Partner Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Stanislav Abadjiev compiled and collated butterfly records for the whole of Bulgaria and published a Local Recording Scheme distribution atlas in 2001 (see below). Records are still being gathered and can be sent to Stoyan Beshkov at NMNH, Sofia. Butterfly List See Butterflies of Bulgaria website (Details below) Introduction Bulgaria is situated in eastern Europe with its eastern border running along the Black Sea coast. It is separated from Romania for much of its northern border by the River Danube. It shares its western border with Serbia and Macedonia, and its southern border with Greece and Turkey. Bulgaria has a land area of almost 111,000 sq km (smaller than England but bigger than Scotland) and a declining human population of 7.15 million (as of 2015), 1.5 million of which live in the capital city, Sofia. It is very varied in both climate, topography and habitats. Substantial parts of the country are mountainous, particularly in the west, south-west and central ‘spine’ of the country and has the highest mountain in the Balkan Mountains (Musala peak in the Rila Mountains, 2925m) (Map 1). Almost 70% of the land area is above 200m and over 27% above 600m. About 40% of the country is forested and this is likely to increase through natural regeneration due to the abandonment of agricultural land. Following nearly 500 years under the rule of the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria was independent for just a few years from 1908 before coming under the domination of the soviet communist regime in 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary Ramsar Information Sheet Published on 8 November 2016 Update Version, Previously Published on 1 January 2012
    RIS for Site no. 1410, Upper Tisza (Felsö-Tisza), Hungary Ramsar Information Sheet Published on 8 November 2016 Update version, previously published on 1 January 2012 Hungary Upper Tisza (Felsö-Tisza) Designation date 4 December 2004 Site number 1410 Coordinates 48°10'42"N 21°56'14"E Area 26 871,00 ha https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1410 Created by RSIS V.1.6 on - 8 November 2016 RIS for Site no. 1410, Upper Tisza (Felsö-Tisza), Hungary Color codes Fields back-shaded in light blue relate to data and information required only for RIS updates. Note that some fields concerning aspects of Part 3, the Ecological Character Description of the RIS (tinted in purple), are not expected to be completed as part of a standard RIS, but are included for completeness so as to provide the requested consistency between the RIS and the format of a ‘full’ Ecological Character Description, as adopted in Resolution X.15 (2008). If a Contracting Party does have information available that is relevant to these fields (for example from a national format Ecological Character Description) it may, if it wishes to, include information in these additional fields. 1 - Summary Summary Felső-Tisza is a typical flood plain between dikes constructed during the end of the 19th and in first half of the 20th centuries. The highly natural and near-natural habitats consist of large patches of softwood riverside forests (Salicetum albae-fragilis) and hardwood riverside forests (Querco-Ulmetum), oxbow lakes, filled in meanders with rich natural flora and fauna, extensively managed or abandoned orchards and plough- lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Coenonympha Oedippus
    Report under the Article 17 of the Habitats Directive European Environment Period 2007-2012 Agency European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity Coenonympha oedippus Annex II, IV Priority No Species group Arthropods Regions Alpine, Atlantic, Black Sea, Continental, Pannonian The False Ringlet (Coenonypha oedippus) is a very local species that is declining at an alarming rate in several countries, though more stable in others. It inhabits low-lying, grassy marshes and reedbeds that are usually situated in the shelter of woodland, creating a warm and humid environment, but also in overgrown dry grasslands in the southern part of its range. The butterflies fly very slowly and hardly ever colonize nearby habitats. The eggs are deposited one by one on the blades of grasses, like meadow-grasses (Poa spp.), rye- grasses(Lolium spp.), hair-grasses (Deschampsia spp.), sedges (Carex spp.) and Purple Moorgrass (Molinea caerulea). Species occurs in Europe, throughout Kazakhstan and South Siberia to China, Korea and Japan. The conservation status unfavourable-bad is in Alpine (same as previous) and Conitnental (deteriorating from unfavourable-inadequate) bioregions, unfavourable-inadequate in Atlantic (improving from unfavourable-bad) and Pannonian (same as previous) bioregions. : The status is unknown in the Black Sea region. The species was last recorded in Bulgaria in 1911 and more surveys are needed to clarify its current status. IUCN Red List Status Europe: Endangered, EU: Least concern, worldwide: Lower Risk/near threatened.The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4. Agricultural improvements (incl. land drainage) as well as abandonment of grassland habitats are the largest threats for this species.
    [Show full text]