<<

©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

HERPETOZOA 11 (1/2): 3-12 Wien, 30. Juli 1998

Distribution patterns of batagurid in the (Testudines: Bataguridae: Cuora, , )

Verbreitungsmuster batagurider Schildkröten auf den Philippinen (Testudines: Bataguridae: Cuora, Cyclemys, Heosemys)

MAREN GAULKE & UWE FRITZ

KURZFASSUNG Derzeit sind fünf Schildkrötentaxa aus der Familie Bataguridae fur die Philippinen bekannt {Cuora amboin- ensis amboinensis, C. amboinensis kamaroma, Cyclemys dentata, Heosemys leytensis, H. spinosa). Nur Cuora amboinensis amboinensis besitzt auf den Philippinen eine weite Verbreitung, während die anderen Formen auf wenige Inseln beschränkt sind. Die Philippinen wurden über zwei verschiedene Einwanderungsrouten besiedelt: Cuora amboinensis kamaroma, Cyclemys dentata und Heosemys spinosa drangen von Borneo aus auf die Philippinen vor. Cuora amboinensis amboinensis muß dagegen von Sulawesi (Celebes) oder von den Molukken her eingewandert sein, also aus einer Region, die ansonsten nur eine geringe herpetofaunistische Beziehung zu den Philippinen aufweist. Die ausgesprochen seltene Heosemys leytensis ist die einzige auf den Philippinen endemische Schildkrötenart. Ihre phylogenetischen und zoogeographischen Beziehungen sind unklar.

ABSTRACT At present, five taxa of batagurid turtles are known to occur in the Philippines (Cuora amboinensis amboin- ensis, C. amboinensis kamaroma, Cyclemys dentata, Heosemys leytensis, H. spinosa). Only one of them, Cuora amboinensis amboinensis occupies a wide range there, whereas the others are restricted to a few islands. Two differ- ent migratory routes were used for colonizing the Philippines: Cuora amboinensis kamaroma, Cyclemys dentata and Heosemys spinosa reached the islands from Borneo. Cuora amboinensis amboinensis colonized the Philippine Ar- chipelago either from Sulawesi or from the Moluccas, a region that otherwise has only slight herpetofaunistic affinities with the Philippines. The extremely rare Heosemys leytensis is the sole chelonian endemic to the Philippines. Its phylogenetic and Zoogeographie relationships are poorly understood.

KEY WORDS Testudines, Bataguridae; Cuora amboinensis amboinensis, Cuora amboinensis kamaroma, Cyclemys den- tata, Heosemys leytensis, Heosemys spinosa; zoogeography, distribution patterns and colonization pathways in the Philippines; Philippine Islands.

INTRODUCTION

The senior author conducted con- In addition, both authors examined tinued herpetological field surveys in dif- voucher specimens of Philippine turtles in ferent regions of the Philippines since several museum collections (California Acad- 1984. During eight stays with durations emy of Sciences, San Francisco; Muséum varying between two months and one year, National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris; Natur- most of the major islands (Bohol, Cebu, historisches Museum Wien; Senckenberg- Leyte, Luzon, Mindanao, Negros, Palawan, Museum Frankfurt; Staatliches Museum Panay, Samar) and several smaller ones für Tierkunde Dresden; Zoological Mu- (Bongao, Busuanga, Calauit, Masbate, San- seum Copenhagen; Zoologisches Museum gasanga, Siasi, Sibutu, Siquijor, Tawitawi, Berlin; Zoologisches Museum Hamburg). Ticao) were visited. During these surveys Below, a review of distribution pat- special emphasis was laid on batagurid terns based on published records and our turtles (cf. GAULKE 1995). own observations is presented. ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

M. GAULKE & u. FRITZ

DISTRIBUTION

For most species reported from couro (SCHWEIGGER, 1812), is distributed the Philippines in earlier times (e.g. DE over Sumatra, Java, and nearby islands. Re- ELERA 1895; DE ROOIJ 1915) there are no cently a further mainland subspecies (C. Philippine voucher specimens represented amboinensis lineata) was described from in scientific collections and the Philippines (MCCORD & PHILIPPEN 1998), are far outside the known geographic range closely resembling C. amboinensis kama- of these taxa: Callagur borneoensis (SCHLE- roma. GEL & S. MOLLER, 1844), Chinemys reevesii Cuora amboinensis amboinensis has (GRAY, 1831), Cuora trifasciata (BELL, been recorded from Luzon, Mindoro, the 1825), C. flavomarginata (GRAY, 1863), bigger islands of the Visayan region and spengleri (GMELIN, 1789), Noto- Mindanao (fig. 1). In detail, the following chelys platynota (GRAY, 1834), Ocadia references exist: Cebu (BROWN & ALCALA sinensis (GRAY, 1834), Platysternon mega- 1986; RUMMLER & FRITZ 1991), Dinagat cephalum GRAY, 1831, (BOETTGER 1886; TAYLOR 1920, 1921; crassicollis (GRAY, 1831), Chi tra indica Ross & LAZELL 1990), Leyte (RUMMLER & (GRAY, 1831), Dogarti a sub piana (GEOFF- FRITZ 1991), Luzon (BOETTGER 1886; TAY- ROY, 1809), sinensis (WlEG- LOR 1920, 1921; RUMMLER & FRITZ 1991; MANN, 1835). Therefore, the Philippine dis- BROWN & al. 1996), Masbate (GAULKE tribution of these species is not acknowl- 1995, voucher specimen in the collection of edged by consecutive workers (TAYLOR the Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde 1920, 1921; ALCALA 1986; DAS 1996 a). Dresden), Mindanao (TAYLOR 1920, 1921; At present, the following batagurid RUMMLER & FRITZ 1991), Mindoro (RUMM- taxa are known from the Philippines: Cu- LER & FRITZ 1991), Negros (BOETTGER ora amboinensis amboinensis (DAUDIN, 1886; BROWN & ALCALA 1986; RUMMLER 1802), C. amboinensis kamaroma RUMM- & FRITZ 1991), Polillo (TAYLOR 1920, LER&FRTTZ, 1991, Cyclemys dentata (GRAY, 1921), Samar (RUMMLER & FRITZ 1991; 1831) sensu stricto, Heosemys leytensis GAULKE 1994). TAYLOR, 1920, and H. spinosa (GRAY, Cuora amboinensis kamaroma has 1831). However, considering the extremely reached only one small Philippine island high diversity of other Philippine chain, the Sulu Archipelago in the south- orders and the recent additions of previ- eastern part of the country (fig. 2). This ously unreported taxa, the future discovery subspecies was for the first time recorded of batagurids new to the Philippine fauna, for the Philippines by GAULKE (1995). In even undescribed ones, is most likely (see 1990 she found C. amboinensis kamaroma also DAS 1996 a). As we intended to base on the islands of Sangasanga and Tawi- our considerations on original data only, we tawi, in 1992 on Jolo (= Sulu). The two did not uncritically include the largely specimens from Jolo in the Muséum Na- sourceless locality records plotted in tional d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN IVERSON(1992). 6152, MNHN 1994.1172), listed under C. Cuora amboinensis is the most wide- amboinensis amboinensis by RUMMLER & spread batagurid species in the Philippines. FRITZ (1991), proved to be misidentified According to ALCALA (1986) it occurs on small juveniles of C. amboinensis kama- virtually all islands. However, ALCALA (I.e.) roma. lists neither localities nor voucher speci- Cyclemys dentata occurs throughout mens or references. RUMMLER & FRITZ the islands of the Palawan Province, on the (1991) demonstrated that C. amboinensis is Sulu Archipelago (Tawitawi) and on Leyte a polytypic species. The Moluccas, Sula- (fig. 3). It is not known whether the popu- wesi, and most Philippine islands are in- lation on Leyte is native or introduced habited by the flat subspecies C. amboinen- (FRITZ & al. 1997). References for islands sis amboinensis, whereas on Borneo and in alphabetical are: Balabac (Bou- the Southeast Asian mainland the domed LENGER 1894; TAYLOR 1920, 1921; ALCA- subspecies C. amboinensis kamaroma oc- LA 1986; FRITZ & al. 1996, 1997), Busu- curs. A third subspecies, C amboinensis anga (FRITZ & al. 1997), Calauit (FRITZ & ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

Distribution patterns of batagurid turtles in the Philippines

al. 1997), Leyte (TAYLOR 1920, 1921; AL- KIRK 1989) and Palawan (TIMMERMAN & CALA 1986), Palawan (BOULENGER 1894; AUTH 1988), from a single locality each. TAYLOR 1920, 1921; ALCALA 1986; FRITZ Heosemys spinosa is the most re- & al. 1996, 1997), Tawitawi (GAULKE cently recorded batagurid of the Philip- 1995; FRITZ & al. 1996, 1997). pines (fig. 5). It is now known to occur Heosemys leytensis, an endemic spe- on Mindanao (DAS 1996 b) and on Ta- cies, is known so far only from two islands witawi Island in the Sulu Archipelago (fig. 4), Leyte (TAYLOR 1920, 1921; BUS- (FRITZ 1997).

DISCUSSION OF DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS

It is evident that the batagurid turtles present on the latter islands, the popula- colonized the Philippines via two different tions there are likely to belong to the sub- immigration routes. Cuora amboinensis species kamaroma because the Palawan kamaroma, Cyclemys dentata, and Heos- region has more faunistic affinities to Bor- spinosa reached the country from neo than to the other Philippine islands. Borneo, where they are widespread. Two We have severe doubts on the cor- connections between Borneo and the Phil- rectness of the C. amboinensis records in- ippines have constituted the main gateways dicated for Palawan and Busuanga on the for the Philippine herpetofauna as well as distribution map in IVERSON (1992). After for other faunal groups: the Borneo-Pala- all, one of us (MG) did not encounter a wan Bridge in the North, and the Sulu Ar- single C. amboinensis during extensive chipelago in the South. Even though the field work on Busuanga, Calauit, and Pala- Borneo-Palawan connection formed a con- wan during several visits to the area be- tinuous landbridge during the Pleistocene tween 1984 and 1996. It may be possible glaciations, while the Borneo-Sulu Archi- that IVERSON'S records are actually based pelago bridge was probably discontinuous on misidentified Cyclemys, a which due to one or two sea channels even during was for a long time thought to include the the peak times of the glaciations, the latter species amboinensis. However, in the was more important as a migratory route Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, for amphibians and (e.g. INGER Paris, there is indeed a stuffed C. ambo- 1954; LEVITON 1963; BROWN & ALCALA inensis (MNHN 1884.59, ad., plastron 1970; GAULKE & ALTENBACH in press). lacking), bearing the old label "No. 1795, Palawan seems to be more or less a dead Bacoco, Ile de la Paragua, Philippines, ALF end. From here only few species migrated MASCHE", which perhaps was the source of further inwards into the Philippines, while IVERSON'S Palawan record (in former times from the Sulu island chain immigration Palawan was called Paragua). Neverthe- continued via Mindanao through the east- less, this specimen not only belongs to the ern Visayan Islands up to Luzon in the "wrong" subspecies (C. amboinensis ambo- North. Considering turtles, C. dentata ap- inensis), but there is neither a locality parently used both gateways, the Palawan named "Bacoco" nor any place with a and the Sulu region, and perhaps has mi- similar spelling on Palawan. Most probably grated via Mindanao up to Leyte. However, the locality data of MNHN 1884.59 stand as outlined in FRITZ & al. (1997), it is pos- for "Bacolor, Pampanga". Pampanga was sible that the population of C. dentata on the name of the former Spanish province Leyte is introduced by man. If the popula- around Bacolor in south-western Luzon. tion proves to be native in future, it is This would be consistent with the sub- likely that C. dentata will be discovered specific identity of MNHN 1884.59. also on Mindanao and probably other is- Additional C. amboinensis from Palawan lands in the area. in the collection of the United States National Museum, Washington, D.C., As far as documented with certainty, are believed to represent introduced C. amboinensis kamaroma has reached specimens (R. I. CROMBIE, Washington - only the Sulu region and not the islands of pers. comm.). the Palawan chain. If C amboinensis is ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

M. GAULKE & u. FRITZ

Moluccas Sulawesi

Fig. 1: Cuora amboinensis amboinensis (DAUDIN, 1802). Distribution on the Philippines and hypothetical immigration route. The question marks refer to the doubtful records discussed in the text

Abb. 1: Cuora amboinensis amboinensis (DAUDIN, 1802). Verbreitung auf den Philippinen und hypothetische Einwanderungsroute. Die Fragezeichen beziehen sich auf im Text diskutierte, zweifelhafte Nachweise. ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

Distribution patterns of batagurid turtles in the Philippines

Fig. 2: Cuora amboinensis kamaroma RUMMLER & FRITZ, 1991. Distribution on the Philippines (Sulu Archipelago) and hypothetical immigration route. The question marks refer to the doubtful records discussed in the text

Abb. 2: Cuora amboinensis kamaroma RUMMLER & FRITZ, 1991. Verbreitung auf den Philippinen (Sulu-Archipel) und hypothetische Einwanderungsroute. Die Fragezeichen beziehen sich auf im Text diskutierte, zweifelhafte Nachweise. ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

M. GAULKE & U. FRITZ

Fig. 3: Cyclemys dentata (GRAY, 1831). Distribution on the Philippines and hypothetical immigration routes. Abb. 3: Cyclemys dentata (GRAY, 1831). Verbreitung auf den Philippinen und hypothetische Einwanderungsrouten. ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

Fig. 4: Heosemys leytensis TAYLOR, 1920. Distribution on the Philippines. Abb. 4: Heosemys leytensis TAYLOR, 1920. Verbreitung auf den Philippinen. ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

10 M. GAULKE & U. FRITZ

Fig. 5: Heosemys spinosa (GRAY, 1831). Distribution on the Philippines and hypothetical immigration route. Abb. 5: Heosemys spinosa (GRAY, 1831). Verbreitung auf den Philippinen und hypothetische Einwanderungsroute. ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

Distribution patterns of batagurìd turtles in the Philippines 11

Like C. amboinensis kamaroma, also The generic allocation of this rare turtle is H. spinosa used the Sulu area as a migra- rather doubtful. The elongated shell and tory route. According to our present knowl- the arrangement of the vertebral scutes edge, it migrated up to Mindanao. It is easily separates it from all other species somewhat surprising that this large and currently attributed to the genus Heosemys conspicuous turtle could escape discovery, (cf. FRITZ & OBST 1996 for species list). or rather identification, until recently. Its Remarkably, the shape of its vertebral discovery on other islands of the Mindanao scutes closely resembles that in Orlitia and region is likely. Siebenrockiella, two monotypic genera Outside the Philippines, C. amboin- forming a natural group within the Bata- ensis amboinensis is only known from Su- guridae (MCDOWELL 1964; GAFFNEY & lawesi and the Moluccas (RUMMLER & MEYLAN 1988). A similar shape of these FRITZ 1991) from where it must have scutes can be observed also in the batagurid reached the Philippines. Despite the fact genus Kachuga. So far, H. leytensis is that the herpetofaunal affinities between known only from Palawan in the West and the Philippines and Sulawesi or the Moluc- Leyte in the East of the Archipelago. The cas are very slight (IN DEN BOSCH 1985), herpetofaunal exchange between Palawan there is no other plausible geographic source and other Philippine islands is greatly re- for this turtle. Other taxa, which confirm at stricted. Most of the typical Philippine least a small herpetofaunal exchange be- forms, like Hydrosaurus pustulatus (ESCH- tween both regions, are for example the SCHOLTZ, 1829) or the skink genus Brachy- colubrid snake Elaphe erythrura (DUMÉ- meles are not found on Palawan (e.g. RIL, BIBRON & DUMÉRIL, 1854), with four ALCALA 1986). Generally spoken, the fau- Philippine and one Sulawesian subspecies nal affinities of the islands of the Palawan (LEVITON 1977), and the Sail finned Lizard chain are greater to Borneo than to any Hydrosaurus sp., which occurs on the other Philippine island (e.g. BROWN & Philippines (except Palawan), Sulawesi and ALCALA 1970; GAULKE & ALTENBACH in the Moluccas, but not on Borneo or other press). Hence, the occurrence of H. leyten- islands of the western Sunda region sis on Palawan and Leyte suggests either (GAULKE 1989; GAULKE & ALTENBACH in that it is, or at least once was, an extremely press). widespread turtle, or that it was transferred An evaluation of the phylogenetic by humans. As in other countries, in the and Zoogeographie relationships of the en- Philippines turtles are kept as pets or demic H. leytensis is not possible. The oc- "living medicine" by many inhabitants. currence of this endemic turtle on the Therefore a dispersal by man cannot be ex- Philippines speaks either for an ancient cluded. Further findings of this interesting immigration of its ancestors, taking the turtle are necessary before its distribution slow evolutionary change of chelonians pattern and systematics can be explained into account, or for an allochorous origin. better.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thanks go to R. BOUR, Muséum National d'His- to Dr. J. V. VlNDUM, California Academy of Sciences, toire Naturelle, Paris, for the loan of specimens. Dr. R. I. San Francisco; Dr. F. TlEDEMANN, Naturhistorisches CROMBŒ, United States National Museum, Washington, Museum Wien; Dr. K. KLEMMER, Dr. G. KÖHLER and D.C., provided a list of Philippine specimens in the col- M. LAUDAHN, Senckenberg-Museum Frankfurt; Dr. R. lection of that museum and information. B. FARKAS, GÜNTHER, Zoologisches Museum Berlin; Dr. J. HAL- Budapest, critically read the manuscript of this study. LERMANN, Zoologisches Museum Hamburg and Dr. J. Further thanks for hospitality or the loan of specimens go B. RASMUSSEN, Zoological Museum Copenhagen.

REFERENCES

ALCALA, A. C. (1986): Guide to Philippine flora Senckenberg. Naturforsch. Ges., Frankfurt a. M.; 1886: and fauna. Vol. X. Amphibians and Reptiles. Quezon 91-134. City (JMC Press), 195 pp. BOULENGER, G. A (1894): On the herpetologi- BOETTGER, O. (1886): Aufzählung der von den cal fauna of Palawan and Balabac- Ann. Mag. Nat. Philippinen bekannten Reptilien und Batrachier.- Ber. Hist., London; (Ser. 6) 14 (80): 81-90. ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at

12 M. GAULKE & U. FRITZ

BROWN, R. M & FERNER, J. W. & SISON, R. V. GAULKE, M. (1994): Notes on the herpetofauna & GONZALES, P. C. & KENNEDY, R. S. (1996): Am- of Panaon and Samar, East Visayans, Philippines.- Ha- phibians and reptiles of the Zambales Mountains of Lu- madryad, Madras; 19: 1-10. zon Island, Republic of the Philippines.- Herpetol. Nat GAULKE, M. (1995): On the distribution of Hist., Salt Lake City; 4(1): 1-22. emydid turtles and the anuran genus Microhyla in the BROWN, W. C. & ALCALA, A. C. (1970): The Philippines.- Asiatic Herpetol. Res., Berkeley, 6: 49-52. zoogeography of the herpetofauna of the Philippine Is- GAULKE, M. & ALTENBACH, A. V. (in press): lands, a fringing archipelago.- Proc. California Acad. Distribution patterns of reptiles and amphibians in the Sci., San Francisco; (4th Ser.) 38 (6): 105-130. Philippines, as indicated by Pleistocene coastlines.- Rus- BROWN, W. C. & ALCALA, A. C. (1986): Com- sian J. Herpetol., Moscow. parison of the herpetofaunal species richness on Negros IN DEN BOSCH, H. A. J. (1985): Snakes of Su- and Cebu Islands, Philippines.- Silliman J., Dumaguete lawesi: Checklist, key and additional biogeographical City, 33 (1-4): 74-86. remarks.-Zool. Verhandl., Leiden; 217: 1-50. BUSKIRK, J. R. (1989): A third specimen and INGER, R. F. (1954): Systematics and zoogeo- neotype of Heosemys leytensis (Chelonia: ).- graphy of Philippine Amphibia.- Fieldiana Zool.; 33 (4): Copeia, Washington, D.C.; 1989 (1): 224-227. 183-531. DAS, I. (1996 a): Status of knowledge of the bi- IVERSON, J. B. (1992): A revised checklist with ology and conservation of non-marine turtles of the distribution maps of the turtles of the world. Richmond, Philippines.- Int Congr. Chelonian Conserv., Gonfaron Indiana (privately printed), xiii + 363 pp. (France); 1995, pp. 81-83. LEVTTON, A. E. (1963): Remarks on the zoogeo- DAS, I. (1996 b): First record of Heosemys spi- graphy of Philippine terrestrial snakes.- Proc. California nosa from the Philippines, with biogeographic notes.- Acad. Sci., San Francisco; (4th Ser.) 31 (15): 369-416. Chelonian Conserv. Biol., Lunenburg; 2 (1): 80-82. LEVITON, A. E. (1977): Contributions to a re- DE ELERA, C. (1895): Catalogo sistematico de view of Philippine snakes. XIV. The snakes of the genus toda la Fauna de Filipinas conocida hasta el presente. Elaphe.- Philippine J. Sci., Manila; 106 (3/4): 99-128. Vertebrados. Manila, pp. 399-407. McCORD, W. P. & PHILIPPEN, H.-D. (1998): A DE ROOIJ, N. (1915): The Reptiles of the Indo- new subspecies of , Cuora amboinensis Australian Archipelago. I. Lacertilia, Chelonia, Emy- lineata, from northern Myanmar (Burma), with remarks dosauria. Leiden (Brill), XIV + 334 pp. on the distribution and geographic variation of the spe- FRITZ, U. (1997): Zum Vorkommen von Heos- cies.- Reptile Hobbyist; March 1998: 51-58. emys spinosa (GRAY, 1831) auf den Philippinen.- MCDOWELL, S. B. (1964): Partition of the genus Faunistische Abb.. Staatl. Mus. Tierkde., Dresden; 21 Clemmys and related problems in the of the (7): 131-134. aquatic Testudinidae.- Proc. zool. Soc. London; 143 (2): FRITZ, U. & GAULKE, M. & SCHRÖDER, H. 239-279. (1996): Ein Beitrag zur Systematik der Dornschild- ROSS, C. A. & LAZELL, J. D. (1990): Amphibi- kröten-Gattung Cyc/ewys.- Herpetofauna, Weinstadt; 18 ans and reptiles of Dinagat and Siargao Islands, Philip- (105): 18-26. pines.- Philippine J. Sci., Manila; 119 (3): 257-286. FRITZ, U. & GAULKE, M. & LEHR, E. (1997): RUMMLER, H.-J. & FRITZ, U. (1991): Geogra- Revision der südostasiatischen Domschildkröten-Gat- phische Variabilität der Amboina-Schamierschildkröte tung Cyclemys BELL, 1834, mit Beschreibung einer Cuora amboinensis (DAUDIN, 1802), mit Beschreibung neuen Art.- Salamandra, Rheinbach; 33 (3): 183-212. einer neuen Unterart, C. a. kamaroma subsp. nov.- Sala- FRITZ, U. & OBST, F. J. (1996): Zur Kenntnis der mandra, Bonn; 27 (1): 17-45. Celebes-Erdschildkröte, Heosemys yuwonoi (McCORD, TAYLOR, E. H. (1920): Philippine turtles.- Phil- IVERSON & BOEADL. 1995).- Herpetofauna, Weinstadt; ippine J. Sei., Manila; 16 (2): 111-144, 7 pis. 18 (102): 27-34. TAYLOR, E. H. (1921): Amphibians and Turtles GAFFNEY, E. S. & MEYLAN, P. A. (1988): A of the Philippine Islands. Manila (Philippine Bureau of phylogeny of turtles. In: BENTON, M. J. (ed.), The phy- Science, Monograph 15), 193 pp. logeny and classification of the tetrapods, Vol. 1 : Am- TlMMERMAN, W. W. & AUTH, D. L. (1988): phibians, Reptiles, Birds. Oxford (Syst. Ass. Spec. Vol., Geographic distribution: Heosemys leytensis.- Herpetol. 35 A), pp. 157-219. Rev., Lawrence; 19(1): 21. GAULKE, M. (1989): Hydrosaurus pustulatus (ESCHSCHOLTZ, 1829), die philippinische Segelechse.- Herpetofauna, Weinstadt; 11 (62): 6-12.

DATE OF SUBMISSION: September 2nd, 1997 Corresponding editor: Heinz Grillitsch

AUTHORS: Dr. MAREN GAULKE, Helene-Mayer-Ring 14 (18. St), D-80809 München, Arbeitskreis Natur- und Artenschutz in den Tropen, Germany, Dr. UWE FRITZ, Staatliches Museum fur Tierkunde, Forschungsstelle, Augustusstraße 2, D-01067 Dresden, Germany.