DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Ridley Island Export Logistics Park Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Ridley Island Export Logistics Park Project Draft Ridley Island Export Logistics Park Project Environmental Effects Evaluation in Support of a Section 82 Mitigation Measures Form July 27, 2020 Prepared for: Prince Rupert Port Authority Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. DRAFT RIDLEY ISLAND EXPORT LOGISTICS PARK PROJECT This document titled Draft Ridley Island Export Logistics Park Project was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of Prince Rupert Port Authority (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Sandra Webster Reviewed by (signature) Kara Hewgill Approved by (signature) Mark Johannes DRAFT RIDLEY ISLAND EXPORT LOGISTICS PARK PROJECT Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... I 1.0 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION .......................................................................................1.1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW AND LOCATION .....................................................................1.1 1.2 REGULATORY CONTEXT ...........................................................................................1.1 1.3 LAND USE ...................................................................................................................1.2 1.4 LEAD AUTHORITY AND OTHER AUTHORITIES ........................................................1.2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................2.1 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT ................................................................. 2.1 2.1.1 Project Overview and Components ............................................................. 2.1 2.1.2 Project Activities .......................................................................................... 2.4 2.1.3 Project Schedule ......................................................................................... 2.6 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................2.6 2.2.1 Biophysical Environment Baseline Conditions ............................................. 2.6 2.2.2 Social Environment ................................................................................... 2.27 3.0 RESOURCES AND CONSULTATION .........................................................................3.1 3.1 INFORMATION RESOURCES .....................................................................................3.1 3.2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION ............................................................................................ 3.1 3.3 INDIGENOUS CONSULTATION ..................................................................................3.3 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODS .......................................................................................... 4.1 4.1 ASSESSMENT BOUNDARIES.....................................................................................4.4 4.2 TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES .........................................................................................4.4 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ................................................................. 5.1 5.1 AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GASES ...............................................................5.1 5.1.1 Scope of Assessment ................................................................................. 5.1 5.1.2 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................... 5.2 5.1.3 Residual Effects and Significance Determination ........................................ 5.3 5.2 NOISE ..........................................................................................................................5.8 5.2.1 Scope of Assessment ................................................................................. 5.8 5.2.2 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................... 5.8 5.2.3 Residual Effects and Significance Determination ........................................ 5.9 5.3 VEGETATION AND WETLANDS ...............................................................................5.11 5.3.1 Scope of Assessment ............................................................................... 5.11 5.3.2 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................. 5.12 5.3.3 Residual Effects and Significance Determination ...................................... 5.13 5.4 WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT .........................................................................5.16 5.4.1 Scope of Assessment ............................................................................... 5.16 5.4.2 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................. 5.17 5.4.3 Residual Effects and Significance Determination ...................................... 5.20 5.5 FISH AND FISH HABITAT ..........................................................................................5.25 DRAFT RIDLEY ISLAND EXPORT LOGISTICS PARK PROJECT 5.5.1 Scope of Assessment ............................................................................... 5.25 5.5.2 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................. 5.26 5.5.3 Residual Effects and Significance Determination ...................................... 5.28 5.6 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HERITAGE RESOURCES ............................................... 5.34 5.6.1 Scope of Assessment ............................................................................... 5.34 5.6.2 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................. 5.35 5.6.3 Residual Effects and Significance Determination ...................................... 5.36 5.7 MANAGEMENT OF ACCIDENTS AND MALFUNCTIONS ......................................... 5.37 5.7.1 Fuel Spill ................................................................................................... 5.37 5.7.2 Train Derailment........................................................................................ 5.38 6.0 EFFECTS ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES ......................................................................6.1 6.1 CHANGE IN PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE AND CURRENT USE OF LANDS AND RESOURCES FOR TRADITIONAL PURPOSES ....................................6.1 6.1.1 Air Quality ................................................................................................... 6.1 6.1.2 Noise ........................................................................................................... 6.1 6.1.3 Vegetation ................................................................................................... 6.2 6.1.4 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat ......................................................................... 6.2 6.1.5 Fish and Fish Habitat .................................................................................. 6.2 6.2 CHANGE IN A STRUCTURE, SITE OR THING OF HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE ..........................................................................6.2 7.0 CONCLUSIONS ...........................................................................................................7.1 7.1 SUMMARY OF FACTORS ...........................................................................................7.1 7.2 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .......... 7.2 7.3 SUMMARY OF LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EFFECTS ....................... 7.7 8.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................8.1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Proponent Contact Information ............................................................................1.5 Table 1-2 Other Responsible Federal Authorities ................................................................1.5 Table 2-1 Details of Project Components during Project Phases 1 and 2 ............................ 2.1 Table 2-2 Ambient Air Quality Baseline Summary Table ......................................................2.8 Table 2-3 Noise Baseline Sound Level Summary Table .................................................... 2.11 Table 2-4 Potentially Occurring Rare Plant Species Within the North Coast Forest District, CWHvh2 ...............................................................................................2.14 Table 2-5 Potentially Occurring Rare Ecological Communities Within the North Coast Forest District CWHvh2 Biogeoclimatic Unit ...................................................... 2.15 Table 2-6 Wildlife Species of Conservation Concern That Have the Potential to Occur On Ridley Island
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pacific Northwest LNG Project
    Pacific NorthWest LNG Project Environmental Assessment Report September 2016 Cover photo credited to Pacific NorthWest LNG Ltd. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catalogue No: En106-136/2015E-PDF ISBN: 978-1-100-25630-6 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes, and in any format, without charge or further permission. Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce materials, in whole or in part, for the purpose of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 or info@ceaa- acee.gc.ca This document has been issued in French under the title: Projet de gaz naturel liquéfié Pacific NorthWest - Rapport d’évaluation environnementale Executive Summary Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership (the proponent) is proposing the construction, operation, and decommissioning of a new facility for the liquefaction, storage, and export of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The Pacific NorthWest LNG Project (the Project) is proposed to be located primarily on federal lands and waters administered by the Prince Rupert Port Authority approximately 15 kilometres south of Prince Rupert, British Columbia. At full production, the facility would receive approximately 3.2 billion standard cubic feet per day, or 9.1 x 107 cubic metres per day, of pipeline grade natural gas, and produce up to 20.5 million tonnes per annum of LNG for over 30 years. The Project would include the construction and operation of a marine terminal for loading LNG on to vessels for export to Pacific Rim markets in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Rupert Sub-Area 15 :'- .], :"0'--" ;~
    022182 PRINCE RUPERT AREA COASTAL FISH HABITAT BIBLIOGRAPHY Prepared for: Department of Fisheries and Oceans North Coast Division 716 Fraser Street Prince Rupert, B.C. V8J 1P9 Prepared by: Gary L. Williams G.L. Williams & Associates Ltd. 2300 King Albert Avenue Coquitlam, B.C. V3J 1Z8 March 1991 --' ··'1 ,. j TABLE OF CONTENTS .. -. .j- l Page TABLE OF CONTENTS @f] LIST OF FIGURES IV INTRODUCTION 1 :'j BIBLIOGRAPHIC LISTING BY AUTHOR 3 BmUOGRAPHIC LISTING BY SUBJECT PRINCE RUPERT SUB-AREA 15 :'-_.], :"0'--" ;~.-- . '-. 1.0 General 16 ,. ".,-]-.. ~- 2.0 Habitat 18 2.1 Physical 18 A. Geomorphology 18 n B. Oceanography 18 2.2 Biological 19 c i : f··l. l_ A. Vegetation 19 B. Invertebrates 20 C. Fish 20 -,' 3.0 Water Quality 22 i~-J 3.1 Permitted Discharges 22 3.2 Permitted Refuse Sites 22 3.3 Reports 22 ._\ ,1 J TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 1 '. :1 Page ,~1 I - 1 ; .J DIGBY ISlAND SUB-AREA 24 "'-'-c-_0~_'J 1.0 General 25 I:. 2.0 Habitat 28 2.1 Physical 28 A. Geomorphology 28 B. Oceanography 28 2.2 Biological 30 A. Vegetation 30 B. Invertebrates 30 C. Fish 31 3.0 Water Quality 33 3.1 Permitted Discharges 33 3.2 Reports 33 PORT EDWARD SUB-AREA 35 1.0 General 36 2.0 Habitat 41 2.1 Physical 41 A. Geomorphology 41 B. Oceanography 41 11 J TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page PORT EDWARD SUB·AREA (continued) 2.2 Biological 44 A. Vegetation 44 B. Invertebrates 46 C. Fish 48 3.0 Water Quality 51 3.1 Permitted Discharges 51 3.2 Permitted Refuse Site 51 3.3 Permitted Special Waste Storage Site 51 3.2 Reports 51 SMITH ISLAND SUB-:'AREA 56 1.0 General 57 2.0 Habitat 59 j'l '.,.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description Table of Contents
    PACIFIC NORTHWEST LNG Project Descripption Prepared for: Prepared by: Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership Stantec Coonsulting Ltd. Oceanic Plaza, Suite 1900 - 1066 West Hastings Street 4370 Dominnion Street, Suite 500 Vancouver, BC V6E 3X1 Burnaby, BC V5G 4L7 Tel: (778) 372-4700 | Fax: (604) 630-3181 Tel: (604) 436-3014 | Fax: (604) 436-3752 Project No.: Date: 1231-10537 July 2013 Pacific NorthWest LNG Project Description Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Nature and Location of the Project ......................................................................... 1 1.2 Proponent Contact Information ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 Overview of Consultation to Date .................................................................................. 2 1.4 Other Relevant Information ............................................................................................ 3 1.4.1 Environmental Assessment Process ............................................................... 3 1.4.2 Regional Study ................................................................................................ 4 2 Project Information ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 General Description and Objectives .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEFINING the MIDDLE PERIOD Fjsoo BP to 1500 BPJ in Tsimshian History Through a Comparison of Archaeological and Oral Records
    DEFINING THE MIDDLE PERIOD fjSoo BP to 1500 BPJ in Tsimshian History through a Comparison of Archaeological and Oral Records ANDREW R.C. MARTINDALE AND SUSAN MARSDEN INTRODUCTION NDIGENOUS ORAL TRADITIONS are compelling sources of information for archaeologists. They represent situated narratives on culture Iand history, which introduce a people's record of their history to the otherwise materialist database of archaeology. Archaeologists routinely make comparisons between indigenous cultures and archae­ ological data, either in the form of generalized analogies or as direct historical analogies between ethnographically known cultures and their archaeologically known antecedents. The use of indigenous oral narratives in archaeology is less common, although much of what is known ethnographically is based on the indigenous oral record. Several successful comparisons are known, however (Klimko andTaft 1990; MacDonald 1984; Marsden 2000; Martindale 1999a; Sharpe andTunbridge 1997). In this paper, we compare archaeological data for the cultural history of theTsimshian people of the northern Northwest Coast of North America to information from their oral histories. Analysis of archaeological data and indigenous oral records presents distinct but comparable views of Tsimshian history. We discuss the history of the Tsimshian from about 3,500 to 1,500 years ago and argue that such a comparison clarifies an evolving pattern of settlement that earlier interpretations of the Tsimshian have not brought into focus. Specifically, we argue that, during the Middle Period between 3,500 and 2,000 years ago, the northern Tsimshian area (Figure 1) consisted of two settlement regions, one on the coast north of the mouth of the Skeena River and the other in the interior around Kitselas Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Prince Rupert1
    City of Prince Rupert1 Quality of Life – Official Community Plan Bylaw 3236, 2007 SCHEDULE ‘A” Consolidated to and including Bylaw No. 3298, 2010 June 7, 2010 Table of Contents 3 Working and Shopping in Prince Rupert (Industrial, Office, Retail, Service) ..... 25 3.1 Local Economy ............................................................................................ 25 3.2 Port and Industrial Development ................................................................. 26 3.3 Commercial Development ........................................................................... 29 4 Living in Prince Rupert (Residential) ................................................................... 33 4.1 Residential Development ............................................................................. 34 4.2 Mixed Use Development ............................................................................. 36 5 Traveling and Mobility in Prince Rupert (Transportation) ................................... 40 5.1 Roads & Sidewalks ...................................................................................... 41 5.2 Parking ......................................................................................................... 43 5.3 Marine and Air Service ................................................................................ 44 5.4 Transit .......................................................................................................... 44 6 Infrastructure Development .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 16.0 Background Information
    KITSAULT MINE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Section 16.0 Background Information VE51988 KITSAULT MINE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BACKGROUND INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS PART D – METLAKATLA INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS ........................................................ 16-1 16.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................................... 16-2 16.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 16-2 16.2 Contact Information and Governance ..................................................................... 16-3 16.3 Territory and Reserves ............................................................................................ 16-4 16.3.1 Métis Nation ................................................................................................ 16-7 16.4 Ethnography ............................................................................................................ 16-7 16.4.1 Pre-Contact ................................................................................................ 16-7 16.4.2 Contact ....................................................................................................... 16-7 16.4.3 Post-Contact ............................................................................................... 16-8 16.5 Demographics ......................................................................................................... 16-8 16.6 Culture and Language ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 ^^L#/Walei a *KJ Status of I ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE TOT975 Porak&R, >1Asonpi '.'
    IRJJ . W; i ,, ' IK l R 2 I V>&M4 MiWwWfc T M< :i.ik:aia (HKCfrlNCIAl/j _ ., r rJ VIRONMENT CANADA 6 "••-. • iS- Jftfa^hffl** i/RUPERT/ § O 0 DI.GBY-IRHV-: / hays .J :•:. I• ISj.AND, • • Sktiena SKIP o MOUNTAIN Khyer '•'!' ,; ^ ', ' -oPoriwJ'orl Edward ft wir.d. K ...!'.», •••- THE SKEENA RIVER ESI Y Carthew FV-. BALMORAL $ \\ ' PEAK •PPon i •••: ./ Essington 1 1 ^^l#/Walei A *KJ status OF i ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE TOT975 PoraK&r, >1asonPI '.',. "[''•".::,• ' y v, Isl.,;,: MaLton '• • [HunnSunn > . Enle. \ M n• —• ' iJ55 ' 'O -TilCKKl- i.CKKl / Ja ' KENNEDY ** KINNEDY ; P 0 R C H E R ISLAND \ %K4> Qf ; s I a n iv 7 1 -M57 Kennedy i - ": 5 A .cA :—; — & V v Qona X. Kitm«r «"" P 0 R C H E R ISLAND f Gibson 131 EGERIA SPECIAL ^yAR¥SERIES:Na3 i MOUNTAIN BATJUSIDE /^ pQlnl A C.2500-— MOUNTAIN / A ""• ', ,,,„ .* : <& . ANCHOR s I LerwickPI A ! . sod PITT ENVIRONMENT CANADA R.OI^cmma. THE SKEENA RIVER ESTUARY STATUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE TO 1975 REPORT OF THE ESTUARY WORKING GROUP DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT REGIONAL BOARD PACIFIC REGION By LINDSAY M. HOOS Under the Direction of Dr. M. Waldichuk Fisheries and Marine Service Pacific Environment Institute West Vancouver, B.C. With A Geology Contribution by Dr. John L. Luternauer Geological Survey of Canada Vancouver, B.C. and A Climatology Section by the Scientific Services Unit Atmospheric Environment Service Vancouver, B.C. Special Estuary Series No.3 Aerial photo of the Skeena River estuary showing De Horsey Island on the right (B.C. Government Air Photo).
    [Show full text]
  • City of Price Rupert
    City of Price Rupert Consol Consolidated for convenience only January, 2015 Table of Contents City of Prince Rupert ............................................................................... i List of Figures and Maps ...................................................................... iv Part A – Background and Context ............................................................................1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Quality of Life Official Community Plan ............................................................ 1 1.2 Quality of Life Defined ...................................................................................... 2 Essential Quality of Life Attributes ....................................................... 3 Areas Functioning Well ......................................................................... 4 Issues Needing to be Addressed .......................................................... 4 1.3 Planning Process ............................................................................................. 5 2 The City in Context ...................................................................................................... 7 2.1 History Context ................................................................................................ 7 2.2 The Physical Setting ........................................................................................ 8 2.3 Regional Context Statement ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Potential Post-Glacial Faults Using Bare-Earth Lidar Topographic Data Near Ridley Island, British Columbia
    Evaluation of Potential Post-Glacial Faults Using Bare-Earth LiDAR Topographic Data Near Ridley Island, British Columbia Nicholas Novoa, L.G. A report prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Earth and Space Sciences: Applied Geosciences University of Washington December 2013 Project Mentor: Mark Molinari, URS Corp. Internship Coordinator: Kathy Troost Reading Committee: Juliet Crider Alison Duvall MESSAGe Technical Report: 002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I am presenting the results of my evaluation to identify topographic lineaments that are potentially related to post-glacial faulting using bare-earth LiDAR topographic data near Ridley Island, British Columbia. The purpose of this evaluation has been to review bare-earth LiDAR data for evidence of post-glacial faulting in the area surrounding Ridley Island and provide a map of the potential faults to review and possibly field check. My work consisted of an extensive literature review to understand the tectonic, geologic, glacial and sea level history of the area and analysis of bare-earth LiDAR data for Ridley Island and the surrounding region. Ridley Island and the surrounding north coast of British Columbia have a long and complex tectonic and geologic history. The north coast of British Columbia consists of a series of accreted terranes and some post-accretionary deposits. The accreted terranes were attached to the North American continent during subduction of the Pacific Plate between approximately 200 Ma and 10 Ma. The terrane and post-accretionary deposits are metamorphosed sedimentary, volcanic and intrusive rocks. The rocks have experienced significant deformation and been intruded by plutonic bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Postglacial Relative Sea-Level History of the Prince Rupert Area, British Columbia, Canada
    Quaternary Science Reviews 153 (2016) 156e191 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Postglacial relative sea-level history of the Prince Rupert area, British Columbia, Canada * Bryn Letham a, , Andrew Martindale a, Rebecca Macdonald a, Eric Guiry a, Jacob Jones a, Kenneth M. Ames b a Department of Anthropology, University of British Columbia, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, V6K 1Z1, Canada b Department of Anthropology, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR, 97207, USA article info abstract Article history: This paper presents a history of relative sea level (RSL) change for the last 15,000 years in the Prince Received 3 July 2016 Rupert region on the northern coast of British Columbia, Canada. One hundred twenty-three radiocarbon Received in revised form ages of organic material from isolation basin cores, sediment sequence exposures, and archaeological 5 October 2016 sites having a recognized relation to past sea levels constrain postglacial RSL. The large number of new Accepted 10 October 2016 measurements relating to past sea-level provides a well constrained RSL curve that differs in significant ways from previously published results. After deglaciation following the Last Glacial Maximum, the region experienced an isostatically-induced rapid RSL drop from as much 50 m asl to as low as À6.3 m asl Keywords: Relative sea level change in as little as a few centuries between 14,500 BP and 13,500 BP. After a lowstand below current sea level Paleoshorelines for about 2000 years during the terminal Pleistocene, RSL rose again to a highstand at least 6 m asl after Northwest Coast the end of the Younger Dryas.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Bird Technical Data Report Proposed Aurora LNG Project
    Marine Bird Technical Data Report Proposed Aurora LNG Project November 2016 Prepared for: Aurora LNG Calgary, Alberta Marine Bird Technical Data Report Authorship November 2016 AUTHORSHIP Jayme Brooks, B.Sc., R.P.Bio. .......................................................................... Author Megan Willie, M.Sc., R.P.Bio. ..............Marine Bird Discipline Lead, Quality Reviewer Michael Preston, M.Sc., R.P.Bio. ................. Wildlife Biologist, Independent Reviewer i Marine Bird Technical Data Report Table of Contents November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2 STUDY AREAS .................................................................................................... 2 2.1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AREA ................................................................................................. 2 2.2 LOCAL ASSESSMENT AREA ......................................................................................................... 2 2.3 REGIONAL ASSESSMENT AREA .................................................................................................. 3 3 REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA SOURCES .......................................................... 4 3.1 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 METHODS ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Archeological Survey on The
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Bureau of American Ethnology BuUetin 133 Anthropological Papers, No. 20 Archeological Survey on the Northern Northwest Coast By PHILIP DRUCKER With Appendix Early Vertebrate Fauna of the British Columbia Coast By EDNA M. FISHER 17 CONTENTS PAGE Acknowledgments 21 Introduction 23 The historic period 25 Tribal distributions on the northern British Columbia coasts 28 The land and the people 28 Artifacts from the Northwest Coast 34 Survey in 1938 62 Coast Tsimshian sites: Prince Rupert district 63 Anian Island 63 Charles Point 67 Other sites in the Prince Rupert district 71 Southern Coast Tsimshian 73 Qalahaituk 73 Other Southern Coast Tsimshian sites 80 Heiltsuk (Northern Kwakiutl) sites 80 Khutze Anchorage ^ 81 Roscoe Inlet 1 and lA 81 Artifacts from Roscoe Inlet lA 90 Kilkitei Village 92 Kynumpt Harbor 98 Schooner Passage 1 98 Sites located and reported 104 Southern Kwakiutl Territory 106 Mortuary customs 107 Other archeologic remains i 109 Results of the 1938 survey HO Materials recovered in 1938 111 Age of the sites 113 Previous investigations 115 Distributions of elements on the northern Northwest Coast 123 The Northern aspect 125 The Milbanke-Queen Charlotte Sound aspect 125 The Straits of Georgia-Puget Sound aspect 126 Culture of the Fraser-Columbia Basins 127 Bibliography 129 Appendix A. Early vertebrate fauna of the British Columbia coast, by Edna M. Fisher 133 19 . ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES 5. Tsimshian sites 132 6. Kwakiutl sites 132 7. House remains 132 8. Burials 132 9. Miscellaneous views 132 TEXT FIGURES 1. Tribal distribution on the northern Northwest Coast 28 2. Types of harpoon barbs 37 3.
    [Show full text]