DOCSLIB.ORG

Safer Neighbourhoods Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safer Neighbourhoods Report STUART ANDERSON MP’S SAFER NEIGHBOURHOODS SURVEY REPORT I want to do what I can to ensure that our community in Wolverhampton can become a safer place to live in, work, and visit. As part of this ongoing work, I launched my ‘safer neighbourhoods’ campaign in February 2021. It consists of three elements: consultation, information, and action. Consultation: my survey ran between February and April 2021. It collected the views of almost 200 constituents – 197 to be exact. You will find the results of this survey in the pages that follow. I have anonymised the results so that no personal details are shared. I will be sending these results to key stakeholders, so they are aware of the issues that are highlighted. Information: I have now written to thousands of constituents about what more we can all do to protect ourselves against crime, anti-social behaviour, any incidents of scam, fraud, and rogue trading on the doorstep. I have also made information available via my website and social media. In my letters, I have included contact details for support organisations such as: • Crimestoppers: 0800 555 111 • Citizens Advice Consumer Helpline: 0808 223 1133 • Victim Support: 0808 1689 111 • Police (non-emergency): 101 Action: As a Member of Parliament, I am continuing to work with all the relevant key partners, such as the West Midlands Police and the City of Wolverhampton Council, to ensure that prompt action can be taken on any cases which are raised with me and my office. I have already worked on more than 500 cases or policy issues relating to crime, law, justice, and rights. Together we can ensure the safety of our community. I look forward to working with you. Yours sincerely, Stuart Anderson MP 1 STUART ANDERSON MP’S SAFER NEIGHBOURHOODS SURVEY REPORT ..................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ............................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 1: SAFER NEIGHBOURHOODS ................................................................................ 3 SECTION 2. NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICING ........................................................................... 4 SECTION 3: SAFETY MATTERS ................................................................................................. 6 SECTION 4: ABOUT YOU ............................................................................................................. 8 APPENDIX A: WARD ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 9 GRAISELEY (20 RESPONDENTS): ........................................................................................ 10 MERRY HILL (28 RESPONDENTS): ..................................................................................... 13 PARK (35 RESPONDENTS): .................................................................................................... 16 PENN (32 RESPONDENTS): .................................................................................................... 19 ST PETER’S (15 RESPONDENTS): ........................................................................................ 22 TETTENHALL REGIS (25 RESPONDENTS): ...................................................................... 25 TETTENHALL WIGHTWICK (42 RESPONDENTS): ......................................................... 28 APPENDIX B: SURVEY TEMPLATE. ....................................................................................... 31 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 197 constituents took part in my ‘safer neighbourhoods’ survey, which ran between February and April 2021. There were five sections. Section one focused on overarching questions. Most constituents told me that crime and anti-social behaviour was an issue in the area in which they live, though the majority said that there had been no change in neighbourhood safety levels since February 2020; it has stayed the same. Overall, most constituents felt moderately safe. Section two examined neighbourhood policing issues. Every constituent had encountered at least one form of anti-social behaviour or crime since February 2020. Most constituents did not report the encounter to the police. While the survey did not ask why this was the case, there might be underlying reasons. For example, constituents might have only been a witness or a bystander, so felt that the question did not apply to them. A third section asked about safety matters issues. More than half of respondents told me that the police were ‘extremely invisible.’ This was especially the case in Tettenhall Regis, where 72% of constituents shared this view. In line with the issues that they had encountered, most constituents wanted to see more done to tackle speeding/traffic issues. In second place, an equal number of constituents wanted to see an increased police presence and more CCTV. Two thirds of constituents agreed with the Government’s plan to recruit 20,000 more police officers and believed that this would help. A fourth section asked constituents about their relationships with political parties. Most constituents told me that they had voted for the Conservatives in the 2019 General Election. More than half of constituents told me that they trusted the Conservatives most to tackle crime and anti-social behaviour, followed by no other political party. This was followed by a section to complete a contact form and sign up to future correspondence, such as my regular newsletter. This document contains anonymised data that has been broken down to a ward-level analysis. 2 SECTION 1: SAFER NEIGHBOURHOODS Firstly, I wanted to find out whether my constituents felt that crime and anti-social behaviour was a particular issue where they lived. Almost two thirds (n. 112) said that they felt crime and anti-social behaviour was a particular issue in their area. A quarter of respondents (n. 48) told me that it was not a particular issue for them. 18% of respondents (n. 35) were unsure. In most wards, at least half of respondents told me that crime/anti-social behaviour was an issue. This rose to 80% of respondents in St Peter’s ward and dropped to 40% in Graiseley ward. Q1. DO YOU FEEL THAT CRIME AND ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR IS A PARTICULAR ISSUE WHERE YOU LIVE? No reply Unsure 1% 18% Yes No 57% 24% Next, I wanted to know whether crime and anti-social behaviour had become more or less of an issue in the twelve months prior to my survey going live in February 2021. Over a third of constituents (n. 68) told me that the area in which they live was less safe. This was particularly true for respondents in Tettenhall Regis, where more than 52% of people told me their area had become less safe. Overall, 11% (n. 21) told me it was much less safe. Most constituents (n. 94) said there had been no change. Only one constituent told me their area had become much safer. Q2. DO YOU FEEL THAT YOUR NEIGHBOURHOOD HAS BECOME MORE OR LESS SAFE SINCE FEBRUARY 2020? It's much more safe 0% It's a little bit more It's much less safe safe 11% 7% It's less safe There's been no 34% change 48% 3 Q3. HOW SAFE DO YOU FEEL IN YOUR NEIGHBOURHOOD? 90 80 77 70 60 60 50 40 36 30 NO. CONSTITUENTS 18 20 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 < EXTREMELY UNSAFE EXTREMELY SAFE > As a local MP, it is important for me to know how safe constituents feel in their area and where improvements are to be made. 196 constituents replied to this question. While only 5 told me that they felt ‘extremely unsafe’, only 18 said that they felt ‘extremely safe’. Most constituents said that they are somewhat safe. 77 reported community safely levels as three out of five. SECTION 2. NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICING Q4. CRIME OR ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR IN THE LAST TWELVE MONTHS I also wanted to find out what kinds of crime or Other Anti-social 7% anti-social behaviour were None behaviour 7% 21% taking place in our community. I listed seven categories, including options for ‘none’ and ‘other’ types. 420 types – Fly-tipping 18% including the latter two options – were logged. All constituents said that they had experienced at least one kind of crime, 123 had Speeding/traffic experienced at least two Theft/burglary issue kinds, 66 reported three or 12% 31% more kinds, 27 reported Violent crime 4% four or GRAISELEY MERRY PARK PENN ST PETER’S TETTENHALL TETTENNHALL TOTAL HILL REGIS WIGHTWICK more kinds, ANTI-SOCIAL 4 11 22 14 12 10 13 86 and 19 BEHAVIOUR SPEEDING ISSUES 11 19 27 25 9 19 21 131 reported VIOLENT CRIME 2 1 3 2 7 1 0 16 THEFT/BURGLARY 5 7 8 11 8 4 9 52 five or FLY-TIPPING 10 6 17 11 14 10 9 77 NONE 3 5 2 4 1 3 12 30 more kinds OTHER 0 3 11 3 3 2 6 28 of crime. Total 35 52 90 70 54 49 70 420 4 The most cited type of crime or anti-social behaviour was speeding/traffic issues, which 131 constituents told me that they had encountered. This was particularly prevalent in Merry Hill and Tettenhall Regis, where more than a third of respondents had experienced this. In second place, 86 constituents told me that they had encountered anti-social behaviour – particularly in Park. 52 constituents told me that Q5. DID YOU REPORT THE INCIDENT they encountered theft/burglary. 28 TO THE POLICE? logged at least one kind of other type of crime/anti-social behaviour. No reply Fly-tipping was notably prevalent 2% Yes 19% in St Peter’s, where over a quarter N/A of respondents had encountered it. 31% I asked constituents whether they had reported the crime or anti- social behaviour they encountered to the police. Almost half of No constituents (n. 94) said that they 48% had not. 31% (n. 62) constituents told me that the question was not applicable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 Census Unless Otherwise Stated
    Area Profiles Wolverhampton Wards This profile has been produced by: Insight and Performance Team Wolverhampton City Council. Tel: 01902 554103 or 01902 554043. [email protected] www.wolverhamptoninprofile.org.uk Wolverhampton's wards Area Profile of : BILSTON EAST ward Total Resident Population : 14,308*** POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS Age Groups*** (MYE 2015) Total % W'ton Households (Hhs) Total % W'ton 0-4 1,169 6.5 7.1 Couple only 742 13.1 13.0 5-15 2,152 6.3 13.3 Lone parent + dependent children 679 12.0 9.4 16-24 1,642 5.5 11.7 Other hhs + dependent children 1,176 20.7 21.8 25-44 4,110 6.0 27.0 Hhs + non dependent children 650 11.5 11.6 45-59 2,482 5.1 19.1 Multi person households aged 65+ 360 6.4 7.6 60-74 1,818 5.3 13.5 Lone pensioner (65+) 775 13.7 12.9 75+ 935 4.4 8.3 Student only 1 0.0 0.3 *Total residents 14,308 100.0 100.0 All other lone person hhs 1,127 19.9 19.3 Other 160 2.8 4.0 Sex*** (MYE 2015) Total % W'ton *Total occupied households 5,670 100.0 100.0 Males 7,050 49.3 49.4 Females 7,258 50.7 50.6 Marital Status Total % W'ton *Total residents 14,308 100.0 100.0 Never married (single & cohabit) 4,015 38.8 37.1 Married 4,105 39.6 43.6 Ethnic Composition Total % W'ton Same-sex civil partnership 20 0.2 0.2 White: British 10,265 76.8 64.5 Separated 319 3.1 2.7 Irish 45 0.3 0.6 Divorced 1,051 10.1 8.5 Gypsy/Irish Traveller 47 0.4 0.1 Widowed 847 8.2 7.9 Other 270 2.0 2.8 *Total residents 16+ 10,357 100.0 100.0 Mixed: White & Black Caribbean 419 3.1 3.4 White & Black African 18 0.1 0.2 Communal Establishments
    [Show full text]
  • FECH Community Hubs and Libraries Report
    REPORT ON POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS OF WOLVERHAMPTON COUNCIL’S VISION FOR COMMUNITY HUBS A Community Perspective ‘The library is far more than a building with books in it’ Walsall Library Consultation Report 2011 Compiled by: Finchfield Estate Community Hub Committee Members: Linda Cox and Pru Coleman 12 th June 2012 1 Distribution list This report will be widely distributed to include the following individuals and organisations: • Council Officers • Finchfield Estate Community Hub Committee Members • Finchfield Estate Community Hub Focus Group Participants • Local Neighbourhood Partnership Service • Local Schools • One Voice • Paul Uppal MP • Public Library News • Speak Up For Libraries • Tettenhall and District Community Council Local Neighbourhood Partnership Board • Trades Union Congress • UNISON • Voices For The Library • Wolverhampton Age UK • Wolverhampton Councillors • Wolverhampton Library Service • Wolverhampton Local Involvement Network (LINk) • Wolverhampton Mental Health Empowerment Team • Wolverhampton Multi Agency Support Teams (MAST) • Wolverhampton Over 50’s Forum • Wolverhampton Primary Care Trust • Wolverhampton Pensioners’ Convention • Wolverhampton Skills for Life • Wolverhampton Voluntary Sector Council • Other interested groups such as community groups and readers/writers groups FECH realises that the above list may not cover all those who may wish to receive a copy of this report. A copy of the report is also available on our website: www.fech.btck.co.uk 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FECH (Finchfield Estate Community Hub) would like to thank all of those who have contributed to this report and the ‘Hands Off Finchfield Library Campaign’. In particular, we would like to thank those members of the community who attended the initial meeting on a very snowy day. We would also like to thank all those who helped collect signatures for the petition particularly those who stood outside Finchfield Library in sub-zero temperatures for hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Findings and Action Plan Introduction
    Key Findings and Action Plan Introduction I believe passionately in protecting our natural environment. Along with tackling climate change, this is one of the most important issues of our generation. As a parent, I want to do all that I can to ensure that the world which we pass on to the next generation is greener and more sustainable. With the UK hosting the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) later this year, I am clear that 2021 must be the year of environmental ambition. Our effort must be a collaborative one which involves governments, businesses, and communities. In Parliament, I am an active member of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on the Environment. We engage regularly with Ministers from the Department for Food, Energy and Rural Affairs. Back at home in Wolverhampton, I organise regular street cleans. These bring the whole community together to make our area much tidier. I have also joined with local campaigners who are working hard to protect our much-loved green spaces, such as at the Wolverhampton Environment Centre, the Seven Cornfields, and Lower Penn. Following your feedback, I am taking part in ‘Plastic Free July’ – an international initiative to dramatically reduce, or cut out completely, the amount of single-plastic that we use in everyday life. There are many practical steps that we can all take to reduce our carbon footprint. I am eager to hear from as many constituents as possible about what more I can be doing on this important subject. My environment survey brings together the views and feedback I have collected.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED Election of a City
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED City of Wolverhampton Council Election of a City Councillor The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a City Councillor for Bilston East Ward Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* FELLOWS (Address in Tom Independent Fellows Lindsey D. Wolverhampton) KAUR (Address in Rashpal Labour Party Simkins Stephen M Wolverhampton) KUMAR 1 Hatfield Drive, The Conservative Sian Ruth Kumar Atul Bilston, WV14 0JW Party Candidate WELLS (Address in UKIP Make Brexit Robert Jacques Edmund F. Wolverhampton) Happen *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. A POLL WILL BE TAKEN on Thursday 2 May 2019 between the hours of 7:00am and 10pm. Dated Thursday 4 April 2019 Tim Johnson Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Civic Centre, St. Peter`s Square, Wolverhampton, WV1 1RG STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED City of Wolverhampton Council Election of a City Councillor The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a City Councillor for Bilston North Ward Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* BIRCH (Address in Labour and Co- Olivia Simpson Scott Wolverhampton) operative Party LAWLEY (Address in UKIP Make Brexit Brian Smith Dennis R. Wolverhampton) Happen SOHAIB (Address in The Conservative Mohammed Devi Sunita Wolverhampton) Party Candidate *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Wolverhampton (Electoral Changes) Order 2003
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2003 No. 2509 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The City of Wolverhampton (Electoral Changes) Order 2003 Made - - - - 29th September 2003 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(1), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(2), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(3) recommendations dated May 2003 on its review of the city(4) of Wolverhampton: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give effect, with one modification, to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(5) and 26(6) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the City of Wolverhampton (Electoral Changes) Order 2003. (2) This Order shall come into force — (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2004, on 15th October 2003; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2004. (1) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen's Printer Version
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. 948 NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE, ENGLAND The Wolverhampton City Primary Care Trust (Establishment) Order 2002 Made---- 21st March 2002 Coming into force 1st April 2002 The Secretary of State for Health, in the exercise of the powers conferred on him by sections 16A(1), (2) and (3) and 126(4) of, and paragraph 1 of Schedule 5A to, the National Health Service Act 1977(a) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, following compliance with the consultation requirements contained in regulations made under section 16A(5) of the Act(b), hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Wolverhampton City Primary Care Trust (Establishment) Order 2002 and shall come into force on 1st April 2002. (2) In this Order, unless the context otherwise requires— “operational date” is to be construed in accordance with paragraph 1(2) of Schedule 5A to the Act; “the trust” means the Wolverhampton City Primary Care Trust established by article 2 of this Order. Establishment, operational date and name of the Primary Care Trust 2.—(1) There is hereby established with effect from 1st April 2002 a Primary Care Trust to be called the Wolverhampton City Primary Care Trust. (2) The operational date of the trust shall be 1st April 2002. Area of the trust 3. The trust shall be established for the area specified in the Schedule to this Order. (a) 1977 c.49; section 16A was inserted by the Health Act 1999 (c. 8) (“the 1999 Act“), section 2(1); section 126(4) was amended by the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Wards of Wolverhampton Showing Councillors 2018/19 and Directors
    Wards of Wolverhampton showing Councillors 2018/19 and Directors KEY CONSERVATIVE COUNCILLOR LABOUR COUNCILLOR Ross Cook Bushbury North Ian Angus Hazel Malcolm Alan Butt Ross Cook Oxley Philip Bateman MBE Ross Cook Rita Potter Louise Miles Mary Bateman Sue Roberts MBE Claire Simm Fallings Park Wednesfield North Ian Brookfield Kate Martin Kate Martin Valerie Evans Steven Evans Sohail Khan Jonathan Yardley Udey Singh Bushbury South & Low Hill Tettenhall Regis Paul Sweet John Denley Peter Bilson Greg Brackenridge Meredith Teasdale Peter O'Neill Bhupinder Gakhal Abaida Ahmed Paula Brookfield Lynne Moran Roger Lawrence Jasbir Kaur Jaspal Wednesfield South Caroline Siarkiewicz Milkinderpal Jaspal St.Peter's Heath Town Kate Martin John Denley John Denley Park Claire Darke Meredith Teasdale Michael Hardacre Craig Collingswood Tettenhall Wightwick Kate Martin Arun Photay Jane Stevenson East Park Wendy Thompson Asha Mattu Anwen Muston John Reynolds Harman Banger Jacqueline Sweetman Keith Inston Richard Lawrence Meredith Teasdale Graiseley Alan Bolshaw Bilston North Simon Bennett Christopher Haynes John Denley Philip Page Welcome Koussoukama Linda Leach Merry Hill Ross Cook Richard Lawrence Ettingshall Blakenhall Zarreena Russell Meredith Teasdale Jas Dehar Beverley Momenabadi John Rowley Sandra Samuels OBE Richard Lawrence Penn Harbans Singh Bagri Martin Waite Bilston East Paul Singh Celia Hibbert Rupinderjit Kaur Barbara McGarrity Mak Singh Valerie Gibson Payal Bedi-Chadha Spring Vale Stephen Simkins Richard Lawrence Reproduced with the permission of Geographer's A-Z for the internal business use of City Of Wolverhampton Council. Licence CO218 For more information regarding Copyright issues, contact the Council's GIS Team on 01902 554597. Quote map reference "Wolverhampton/A1 AZ Wards in Colour Councillors 2019.mxd" This plan was UPDATED from 04.05.2018 Councillor List 1:20,000 ¯.
    [Show full text]
  • Dlbeotoby,] 'Re'rtenball
    DlBEOTOBY,] 'rE'rTENBALL. 889 Tettenhall College, beautifully situated on a richly-wooded acres, inclusive of 46 of water; rateable value, £13,818; sandstone ridge, about 2 miles from Wolverhampton, was the population in I901 was I,122. established in I 863 by the Midland Counties Proprietary Tettenhall Wood is an ecclesiastical parish, formed Schools Co. and is under the management of a board of 16 June 23, 1868, and includes Compton, Finchfield and directors; the object of the school is to prepare boys either Trescott. Christ church, erected in I 866, is a building ot for commercial pursuits or for the universities and to im­ stone, in the Early English style, consisting of chancel, part a religious education in harmony with the principles nave, aisles, south porch and a bell: there are sittings for held by Evangelical Christians : an excellent chemical and 550 persons, of which 250 are free. The register dates physical laboratory stands in the grounds apart from the from the year 1868. The living is a vicarage, net yearly main building, and there is a carpenter's workshop and value £235, including tithe rent-charge, average £38, but an engineering 1iepartment with a metal workshop well chiefly derived from pew rents, with residence, in the gift fitted up, and practical instruction in the various branches of Lord Wrottesley, and held since 1888 by the Rev. Ben­ of metaJ work and engineering, electrical as well as jamin Danks M.A. of Corpus Christi college, Cambridge. general, is given by skilled instructors, so that pupils gain A school church, to seat ISO persons, was erected at Finch­ a thorough acquaintance with the use of tools, lathes, dy­ field in 1875, and is served by the vicar of Tettenhall Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Appendix 2: Draft Electoral Forecast Table of contents Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1 – The “Forecasting the Electorate” flowchart, from LGBCE ............................. 2 Local Authority Review and Forecast ................................................................................................... 2 Adult population forecast ................................................................................................... 2 Ratio of electors to adult population .................................................................................. 3 Table 1: Ratio electors to adults (Electorate from Electoral Services, CWC) ................. 3 Predicted number of electors in 2026 ................................................................................ 3 Forecasting the electorate for Small Areas .......................................................................................... 3 Additional electors from new housing development .......................................................... 4 New housing addition ........................................................................................................ 4 Electorate per dwelling ...................................................................................................... 4 Factor for vacant dwellings ................................................................................................ 4 Forecast additional
    [Show full text]
  • Political Groups on the Council to Make Representations Direct to the Committee
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Wolverhampton Report to The Electoral Commission May 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 335 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 11 2 Current electoral arrangements 13 3 Draft recommendations 17 4 Responses to consultation 19 5 Analysis and final recommendations 21 6 What happens next? 37 Appendices A Final recommendations for Wolverhampton: Detailed mapping 39 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 41 C First draft of electoral change Order for Wolverhampton 43 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverhampton City Council OPEN INFORMATION ITEM
    Agenda Item No: 9 Wolverhampton City Council OPEN INFORMATION ITEM nd Committee / Panel PLANNING COMMITTEE Date 22 May 2007 Originating Service Group(s) REGENERATION AND ENVIRONMENT Contact Officer(s)/ STEPHEN ALEXANDER (Head of Development Control) Telephone Number(s) (01902) 555610 Title/Subject Matter APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER OFFICER DELEGATION, WITHDRAWN, ETC. The attached Schedule comprises planning and other application that have been determined by authorised officers under delegated powers given by Committee, those applications that have been determined following previous resolutions of Planning Committee, or have been withdrawn by the applicant, or determined in other ways, as details. Each application is accompanied by the name of the planning officer dealing with it in case you need to contact them. The Case Officers and their telephone numbers are Wolverhampton (01902): Major applications Minor applications Other applications Ian Holiday 555630 Alan Murphy 555632 Martyn Gregory 551125 (Section Leader) (Section Leader) (Section Leader) Mizzy Marshall 551133 (Planning Officers) (Planning Officers) (Senior Planning Officer) Ken Harrop 555649 Tracey Homfray 555641 Jenny Davies 555608 Ragbir Sahota 555616 Richard Pitt 551674 Mindy Cheema 551360 Rob Hussey 551130 (Planning Officer) Phillip Walker 555632 Nussarat Malik 551132 Mark Elliot 555648 Sarah Luxmoore 555602 HEAD OF DEVELOPMENT CONTROL: STEPHEN ALEXANDER 555610 FAXES can be sent on 551359 or 558792 E-MAIL [email protected] Page 1 of 57 PLANNING
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Request for Information
    [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED] Response to Request for Information Reference FOI 091566 Date 15 September 2015 Electorates Request: I would like to receive the figures for total electorates in each WARD of Wolverhampton council who are eligible to vote in a UK GENERAL ELECTION as of the current date. (i.e. figures excluding those voters only able to vote in local or european elections). The Electoral Registration Officer and The Returning Officer do not carry out their duties on behalf of the local authority but in their own personal capacity. A list of public bodies and local authorities that are subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act is available at the following website: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/schedule/1 As you will see, the Freedom of Information Act does not list any person appointed under the Representation of the People Act 1983. It follows that the Electoral Registration Officer, Returning Officer or any other person appointed under the Act are not subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Notwithstanding that there is no statutory obligation to provide this information; please see below the Parliamentary Electorate figures in the format that is available to Wolverhampton City Council. [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED] Analysis Parliamentary Electorate Totals for September 2015 Register Parliamentary Polling District Electorate Wolverhampton North AAA - Bushbury North 1,947 East ACA - Bushbury North 966 ADA - Bushbury North 939 AEA - Bushbury North 1,010 AFA - Bushbury North 1,165
    [Show full text]