‘It’s a narsty biziness’ : conservatism and subversion in 1930s detective fiction and thrillers White, G http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350079175.ch-008 Title ‘It’s a narsty biziness’ : conservatism and subversion in 1930s detective fiction and thrillers Authors White, G Type Book Section URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/53143/ Published Date 2021 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at:
[email protected]. ‘It’s a narsty biziness’: Conservatism and Subversion in 1930s Detective Fiction and Thrillers Glyn White This chapter focuses on popular fiction and particularly the crime genre, encompassing both the detective story and the thriller. Critical surveys looking back across the decades finds these subgenres difficult to distinguish over time but writers of the 1930s are very much aware of which subgenre they are writing in and its relative status. In 1942 Nicholas Blake asserted that ‘It is an established fact that the detective novel proper is read almost exclusively by the upper and professional classes. The so-called “lower middle” and “working classes” tend to read “bloods”, thrillers.’ And, he points out, ‘the modern thriller is generally much below the detective story in sophistication and style’ (xxii) Given the perceived hierarchy of readership and regard, defining the difference between these subgenres became important to some authors.