DOCSLIB.ORG

The Five Senses in Medieval and Early Modern England Intersections Interdisciplinary Studies in Early Modern Culture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Five Senses in Medieval and Early Modern England Intersections Interdisciplinary Studies in Early Modern Culture The Five Senses in Medieval and Early Modern England Intersections Interdisciplinary Studies in Early Modern Culture General Editor Karl A.E. Enenkel (Chair of Medieval and Neo-Latin Literature Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster e-mail: kenen_01@uni_muenster.de) Editorial Board W. van Anrooij (University of Leiden) W. de Boer (Miami University) Chr. Göttler (University of Bern) J.L. de Jong (University of Groningen) W.S. Melion (Emory University) R. Seidel (Goethe University Frankfurt am Main) P.J. Smith (University of Leiden) J. Thompson (Queen’s University Belfast) A. Traninger (Freie Universität Berlin) C. Zittel (University of Stuttgart) C. Zwierlein (Harvard University) VOLUME 44 – 2016 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/inte The Five Senses in Medieval and Early Modern England Edited by Annette Kern-Stähler Beatrix Busse Wietse de Boer LEIDEN | BOSTON Cover illustration: The late ninth-century Anglo-Saxon Fuller Brooch, showing the earliest known personification of the Five Senses. Hammered silver and niello, diameter: 11.4 cm. London, British Museum. Image © Trustees of the British Museum. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016008197 Want or need Open Access? Brill Open offers you the choice to make your research freely accessible online in exchange for a publication charge. Review your various options on brill.com/brill-open. Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 1568-1181 isbn 978-90-04-31548-8 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-31549-5 (e-book) Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill nv incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill nv provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, ma 01923, usa. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper and produced in a sustainable manner. Contents Acknowledgments vii Notes on the Editors viii Notes on the Contributors x List of Illustrations xiv Introduction 1 Annette Kern-Stähler and Kathrin Scheuchzer PART 1 Sensing and Understanding 1 Sight and Understanding: Visual Imagery as Metaphor in the Old English Boethius and Soliloquies 21 Katherine Hindley 2 Coming to Past Senses: Vision, Touch and Their Metaphors in Anglo-Saxon Language and Culture 36 Javier E. Díaz-Vera PART 2 Vision and Its Distortion 3 Bleary Eyes: Middle English Constructions of Visual Disabilities 69 Beatrix Busse and Annette Kern-Stähler 4 Exterior Inspection and Regular Reason: Robert Hooke’s and Margaret Cavendish’s Epistemologies of the Senses 96 Virginia Richter 5 Hierarchies of Vision in John Milton’s Paradise Lost 117 Tobias Gabel vi contents PART 3 The Perilous Senses 6 Strange Perceptions: Sensory Experience in the Old English “Marvels of the East” 137 Dieter Bitterli 7 The Perils of the Flesh: John Wyclif’s Preaching on the Five Bodily Senses 163 Sean A. Otto 8 The Senses and Human Nature in a Political Reading of Paradise Lost 177 Jens Martin Gurr PART 4 The Multisensual 9 The Multisensoriality of Place and the Chaucerian Multisensual 199 Richard G. Newhauser 10 ‘Eate Not, Taste Not, Touch Not’. The Five Senses in John Foxe’s Actes and Monuments 219 Kathrin Scheuchzer PART 5 The Theatre as Sensory Experience 11 Smell in the York Corpus Christi Plays 239 Rory G. Critten and Annette Kern-Stähler 12 The Sensory Body in Shakespeare’s Theatres 269 Farah Karim-Cooper Afterword: From Gateways to Channels. Reaching towards an Understanding of the Transformative Plasticity of the Senses in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods 286 Elizabeth Robertson Index Nominum 297 Acknowledgments Most of the contributions to this volume began their life as papers presented at an international conference on the five senses in medieval and early modern cultures, which we organized in June 2014 at the University of Bern. We would like to thank the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Burgergemeinde Bern and the Universities of Bern and Heidelberg for their generous financial sup- port that made this conference possible. We wish to thank Dr Nicole Nyffenegger, Dr des. Kathrin Scheuchzer, Eva Beyeler, David Jost and Xenia Netos for their invaluable help in organizing and running the conference and, of course, the speakers: Dieter Bitterli, Tobias Gabel, Vincent Gillespie, Jens Martin Gurr, Katherine Hindley, Marianna Hintikka, Farah Karim-Cooper, Richard Newhauser, Melinda Nielsen, Marco Nievergelt, Nicole Nyffenegger, Sean Otto, Virginia Richter, Elizabeth Robertson, Jens Rüffer, Kathrin Scheuchzer, Abigail Shinn, Alessandro Simari, Elizabeth Swann, and Irma Taavitsainen. We feel privileged that the General Editor and the Editorial Board approved publication in this series, and we should like to thank them for their confi- dence in our project and for their generous support and encouragement while we were preparing this volume for print. We wish to extend our gratitude to the peer-reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments, to John Thompson for his advice on several con- tributions, and to the staff at Brill, especially Mr Ivo Romein, for their invalu- able part in bringing this book to life. Elizabeth Robertson has been extremely generous in sharing her ideas with us during and after the conference, and we would like to thank her for reflect- ing on, and responding to, the contributions in an afterword to this volume. We have received editorial assistance from a number of people, and we would like to express our appreciation for their careful reading and invaluable assistance: at the University of Heidelberg, Dr Ruth Möhlig-Falke, and at the University of Bern, Dr Rory Critten, Dr des. Kathrin Scheuchzer and Matthias Berger, MA. We would like to thank the contributors to this volume for their patience. We wish to thank our students at Bern and Heidelberg for their lively discus- sions in our seminars on the senses, which helped shape our ideas. For their sense of humour we thank Udo, Axel, Timon and Maël. Bern, Heidelberg and Oxford, Ohio Annette Kern-Stähler, Beatrix Busse and Wietse de Boer Notes on the Editors Beatrix Busse PhD (2004), University of Heidelberg, is Full Professor and Chair of English Linguistics at that university. Her research interests include the history of English and historical linguistics, corpus linguistics, stylistics and language in urban spaces. Beatrix Busse is the author of the monograph Vocative Constructions in the Language of Shakespeare (Benjamins 2006). She is cur- rently completing a monograph on nineteenth-century speech, writing and thought presentation for Oxford University Press. Annette Kern-Stähler is Full Professor and Chair of Medieval English Studies at the University of Bern. She holds an MA in Medieval Studies from the University of York and did her doctoral studies at the Universities of Bonn, Münster and Oxford (PhD 2000). She was assistant professor at the University of Münster (Habilitation 2007) and Chair of English Literary and Cultural Studies at the University of Duisburg-Essen. She has held a number of fellowships, among them an Andrew Mellon Fellowship at the Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas at Austin and a Christopher Isherwood Fellowship at the Huntington Library, San Marino. She has been a professeure invitée at the École Normale Supérieure de Lyon and is honorary professor at the University of Kent at Canterbury. She has published widely on late medieval literature and culture and is particularly interested in the interrelations between material culture, sense perception and affect. She is the author of the monograph A Room of One’s Own (2002), which explores the uses and transformations of space in late medieval England. Among her research interests are also interrelations between medicine, ethics and literature (Ethik in der Medizin, 2013, co-authored with Bettina Schöne- Seifert and Anna Thiemann) and the role of British writers in the re-education of the Germans after the war: Her monograph A Missionary Zeal was published in 2009, and she is currently completing a monograph on writers as cultural arbiters for Northwestern University Press. Together with Professors Elizabeth Roberston and Fiona Macpherson (both Glasgow) she is running an interna- tional project on the “Senses: Past and Present”, funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Notes On The Editors ix Wietse de Boer is Professor of History at Miami University (Ohio). His research interests are focused on the religious and cultural history of early modern Italy. He is the author of The Conquest of the Soul: Confession, Discipline and Public Order in Counter-Reformation Milan (2001). Recent publications include the Intersections volumes Religion and the Senses in Early Modern Europe (co- edited with Christine Göttler, 2013) and Space and Conversion in Global Perspective (co-edited with Giuseppe Marcocci, Aliocha Maldavsky, and Ilaria Pavan, 2015). He is currently completing a monograph on religion and sen- sory experience in early modern Italy. Articles on the subject appeared in Intersections volumes 9 (Spirits Unseen, 2009) and 17 (Meditatio – Refashioning the Self, 2010), as well as the Ashgate Research Companion to the Counter- Reformation (2013). Notes on the Contributors Dieter Bitterli has taught Old and Middle English language and literature at the Universities of Lausanne and Zurich (Switzerland), where he works as a lecturer in the English Department. His two main areas of research are Anglo-Saxon litera- ture, including the relations between medieval Latin and the vernacular, and Early Modern emblems and architecture.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'The Apish Art': Taste in Early Modern England
    ‘THE APISH ART’: TASTE IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND ELIZABETH LOUISE SWANN PHD THESIS UNIVERSITY OF YORK ENGLISH AND RELATED LITERATURE JULY 2013 Abstract The recent burgeoning of sensory history has produced much valuable work. The sense of taste, however, remains neglected. Focusing on the early modern period, my thesis remedies this deficit. I propose that the eighteenth-century association of ‘taste’ with aesthetics constitutes a restriction, not an expansion, of its scope. Previously, taste’s epistemological jurisdiction was much wider: the word was frequently used to designate trial and testing, experiential knowledge, and mental judgement. Addressing sources ranging across manuscript commonplace books, drama, anatomical textbooks, devotional poetry, and ecclesiastical polemic, I interrogate the relation between taste as a mode of knowing, and contemporary experiences of the physical sense, arguing that the two are inextricable in this period. I focus in particular on four main areas of enquiry: early uses of ‘taste’ as a term for literary discernment; taste’s utility in the production of natural philosophical data and its rhetorical efficacy in the valorisation of experimental methodologies; taste’s role in the experience and articulation of religious faith; and a pervasive contemporary association between sweetness and erotic experience. Poised between acclaim and infamy, the sacred and the profane, taste in the seventeenth century is, as a contemporary iconographical print representing ‘Gustus’ expresses it, an ‘Apish Art’. My thesis illuminates the pivotal role which this ambivalent sense played in the articulation and negotiation of early modern obsessions including the nature and value of empirical knowledge, the attainment of grace, and the moral status of erotic pleasure, attesting in the process to a very real contiguity between different ways of knowing – experimental, empirical, textual, and rational – in the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Ambition in the Career of Jan Lievens (1607-1674)
    ABSTRACT Title: EVOLUTION AND AMBITION IN THE CAREER OF JAN LIEVENS (1607-1674) Lloyd DeWitt, Ph.D., 2006 Directed By: Prof. Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr. Department of Art History and Archaeology The Dutch artist Jan Lievens (1607-1674) was viewed by his contemporaries as one of the most important artists of his age. Ambitious and self-confident, Lievens assimilated leading trends from Haarlem, Utrecht and Antwerp into a bold and monumental style that he refined during the late 1620s through close artistic interaction with Rembrandt van Rijn in Leiden, climaxing in a competition for a court commission. Lievens’s early Job on the Dung Heap and Raising of Lazarus demonstrate his careful adaptation of style and iconography to both theological and political conditions of his time. This much-discussed phase of Lievens’s life came to an end in 1631when Rembrandt left Leiden. Around 1631-1632 Lievens was transformed by his encounter with Anthony van Dyck, and his ambition to be a court artist led him to follow Van Dyck to London in the spring of 1632. His output of independent works in London was modest and entirely connected to Van Dyck and the English court, thus Lievens almost certainly worked in Van Dyck’s studio. In 1635, Lievens moved to Antwerp and returned to history painting, executing commissions for the Jesuits, and he also broadened his artistic vocabulary by mastering woodcut prints and landscape paintings. After a short and successful stay in Leiden in 1639, Lievens moved to Amsterdam permanently in 1644, and from 1648 until the end of his career was engaged in a string of important and prestigious civic and princely commissions in which he continued to demonstrate his aptitude for adapting to and assimilating the most current style of his day to his own somber monumentality.
    [Show full text]
  • MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES to MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences Of
    MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Matthew Glen Minix UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2016 MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Name: Minix, Matthew G. APPROVED BY: _____________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Dissertation Director _____________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader. _____________________________________ Anthony Burke Smith, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader _____________________________________ John A. Inglis, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader _____________________________________ Jack J. Bauer, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Daniel Speed Thompson, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Religious Studies ii © Copyright by Matthew Glen Minix All rights reserved 2016 iii ABSTRACT MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Name: Minix, Matthew Glen University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation considers a spectrum of five distinct approaches that mid-twentieth century neo-Thomist Catholic thinkers utilized when engaging with the tradition of modern scientific psychology: a critical approach, a reformulation approach, a synthetic approach, a particular [Jungian] approach, and a personalist approach. This work argues that mid-twentieth century neo-Thomists were essentially united in their concerns about the metaphysical principles of many modern psychologists as well as in their worries that these same modern psychologists had a tendency to overlook the transcendent dimension of human existence. This work shows that the first four neo-Thomist thinkers failed to bring the traditions of neo-Thomism and modern psychology together to the extent that they suggested purely theoretical ways of reconciling them.
    [Show full text]
  • Posterior Parietal Cortex Represents Sensory History and Mediates Its Effects on Behavior Athena Akrami1,2,3, Charles D
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/182246; this version posted January 4, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Posterior parietal cortex represents sensory history and mediates its effects on behavior Athena Akrami1,2,3, Charles D. Kopec1,2, Mathew E. Diamond4, Carlos Brody1,2,3 1. Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. 2. Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. 3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute. 4. Tactile Perception and Learning Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), 34136 Trieste, Italy Many models of cognition and of neural computations posit seconds, here auditory pink noise stimuli, ‘sa’ and ‘sb’; rats were the use and estimation of prior stimulus statistics1–4: it has rewarded for correctly reporting which of the two was louder 16 long been known that working memory and perception are (Fig. 1a). Following ref. , the set of [sa, sb] pairs used across strongly impacted by previous sensory experience, even trials in a session was chosen so that neither stimulus alone when that sensory history is irrelevant for the current task contained sufficient information to solve the task (Fig. 1b). As at hand. Nevertheless, the neural mechanisms and brain with any magnitude discrimination task, the smaller the regions necessary for computing and using such priors are difference between stimuli, the harder the task (Fig. 1c).
    [Show full text]
  • The Expanding Field of Sensory Studies (V.1.0) July 2013
    The Expanding Field of Sensory Studies (version 1.0 – July 2013) David Howes, Centre for Sensory Studies, Concordia University, Montreal The sensorium is a fascinating focus for cultural studies Walter J. Ong, “The Shifting Sensorium” (1991) In sensory studies, the senses are treated as both object of study and means of inquiry. Sensory studies stands for a cultural approach to the study of the senses and a sensory approach to the study of culture. It challenges the monopoly that the discipline of psychology has long exercised over the study of the senses and sense perception by highlighting the sociality of sensation. History and anthropology are the foundational disciplines of this field. Sensory studies encompasses many other disciplines besides these two, however, as scholars from across the humanities and social sciences have, over the past few decades, successively “come to their senses” and turned their attention on the sensorium. The Senses and Society journal, which launched in 2006, is one manifestation of this convergence. The Sensory Studies website, which went live in 2010, is another (see www.sensorystudies.org), This essay is dedicated to tracing the history of the sensory turn in contemporary scholarship, and pointing to some directions for future research. It starts with an overview of the emergence and development of the history and anthropology of the senses. It goes on (in Part II) to examine how the senses have come to figure as a subject of study and means of inquiry in a range of other disciplines, including, for example, geography, sociology, linguistics, aesthetics and communication studies. In Part III, the focus shifts to how the field of sensory studies can otherwise be conceptualized as made up of visual culture, auditory culture (or sound studies), smell culture, taste culture and the culture of touch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Perception of the Five Senses
    IKONOTHEKA 29, 2019 Sara Benninga deparTmenT oF arT hisTory, Tel aviv universiTy [email protected] The Changing Perception of the Five Senses Abstract This article examines the changing approach towards the representation of the senses in 17th-century Flemish painting. These changes are related to the cultural politics and courtly culture of the Spanish sovereigns of the Southern Netherlands, the Archdukes Albert and Isabella. The 1617–18 painting-series of the Five Senses by Jan Brueghel the Elder and Peter Paul Rubens as well as the pendant paintings on the subject are analyzed in relation to the iconography of the five senses, and in regard to Flemish genre themes. In this context, the excess of objects, paintings, scientific instruments, animals, and plants in the Five Senses are read as an expansion of the iconography of the senses as well as a reference to the courtly material culture of the Archdukes. Framing the senses as part of a cultural web of artifacts, Brueghel and Rubens refer both to elite lived experience and traditional iconography. The article examines the continuity between the iconography of the senses from 1600 onwards, as developed by Georg Pencz, Frans Floris, and Maerten de Vos, and the representation of the senses in the series. In addition, the article shows how certain elements in the paintings are influenced by genre paintings of the courtly company and collector’s cabinet, by Frans Francken, Lucas van Valckenborch and Louis de Caullery. Through the synthesis of these two traditions the subject of the five senses is reinvented in a courtly context.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Dialogue-Final-2
    Docent Council Dialogue Winter 2013 Published by the Docent Council Volume XLIIl No 2 From Ethereal to Earthy The Legacy of Caravaggio 1 Inside the Dialogue Reflections on a Snowy Morning.......................Diane Macris, President, Docent Council Page 3 Winter Message..................................................Charlene Shang Miller, Docent and Tour Programs Manager Page 3 A Docent’s Appreciation of Alona Wilson........................................................JoAn Hagan, Docent Page 4 An Idea whose Time had Come................................Sandy Voice Page 5 Presentations:Works of Art from Burst of Light ......Docent Contributors Pages 7-20 The Transformative Genius of Caravaggio...............JoAn Hagan Page10 Flicks: The Dialogue Goes to the Cinema....................................................Sandy Voice Page 10 A Docent’s Guide to the Saints..................................Beth Malley Page 11 From the Sublime to the Ridiculous and Back..........Hope Vath Page 13 The Bookshelf: A Book Review.................................BethMalley Page 15 A Passion for Stickley ...............................................Laura Harris Page 20 From the Collection of Stephen Gray Docent Council Dialogue The Dialogue is created by and for docents and provides a forum for touring ideas and techniques, publishing information that is vital to docent interests such as museum changes, and recording docent activities and events. The newsletter is published in Fall, Winter, and Spring editions. Editorial Staff Sandy Voice Co-Editor
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Construction of the Soundscape of the Castilian Cities (15Th and 16Th Centuries)
    acoustics Article The Social Construction of the Soundscape of the Castilian Cities (15th and 16th Centuries) Gisela Coronado Schwindt Departamento de Historia, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina; [email protected] Abstract: This paper seeks to develop some conceptual elements that articulated the social construc- tion of the soundscape of the urban spaces of the kingdom of Castile (15th–16th centuries). We focus our attention on the revision of the normative spheres that structured the subjective universe of the Castilian inhabitants, in order to notice and spot the different sound representations that intervened in the spatial and social configuration of the cities, their possible conflicts, and levels of acoustic tolerance. This proposal is part of the so-called “sensorial turn” in the Social Sciences, defined by David Howes as a cultural approach to the study of the senses as well as a sensorial approach to the study of culture. The research is carried out through the analysis of the sensory marks present in a documentary corpus made up of normative documents (municipal ordinances, books of agreement, chapter acts, diocesan synods, and royal dispositions) and judicial documents (General Archive of Simancas) combining methods of discourse analysis and the history of the senses. In the article, we argue and remark that the sound dimension operated as a device that acted in the shaping of the identity of places, since it contributed to define and delimit their use. This was reflected in the importance given by the authorities to the normative regulation of the community, which included a textual dimension in which the historical soundscape was imprinted, revealing the multiple social interactions that integrated it.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of 'Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting and Touching in History'
    Jones-Katz, G. [2011]. Review of ‘Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting and Touching in History.’ by Mark M. Smith. The Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. Online. Available. http://social- epistemology.com/ Smith, Mark M. Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting, and Touching in History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007. 123 pp. On How (Not) to Turn the Senses into Food for Thought; or, When Context is King Gregory Jones-Katz There is yet another ‘turn’ in US History departments: sensory history. Touted by historians in The American Historical Review, with prospective scholarship to ‘examine hitherto ignored phenomena,’ thereby ‘opening unexplored territories of the past,’ the history of the senses has a promising future.1 Mark Smith, Professor of History at the University of South Carolina and president of The Historical Society, has been a prominent contributor to the field for almost a decade. Smith makes his case for sensory history in Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting, and Touching in History, published a few years before the current interest. In Sensing, Smith traces the importance of the senses for chief cultural developments from antiquity to the pre-Enlightenment era, focusing on how the senses informed the modern emergence of ‘social classes, race and gender conventions, industrialization, urbanization, colonialism, imperialism, nationalism, [and] ideas concerning selfhood and the “other”’ (1). This review essay concentrates on and challenges Smith’s views of how the historian should produce, assess, and validate histories of the senses. Rather than offer a new understanding of how to write sensory history, Smith’s approach is disappointedly status quo.
    [Show full text]
  • Bodies of Knowledge: the Presentation of Personified Figures in Engraved Allegorical Series Produced in the Netherlands, 1548-1600
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2015 Bodies of Knowledge: The Presentation of Personified Figures in Engraved Allegorical Series Produced in the Netherlands, 1548-1600 Geoffrey Shamos University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Shamos, Geoffrey, "Bodies of Knowledge: The Presentation of Personified Figures in Engraved Allegorical Series Produced in the Netherlands, 1548-1600" (2015). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1128. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1128 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1128 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bodies of Knowledge: The Presentation of Personified Figures in Engraved Allegorical Series Produced in the Netherlands, 1548-1600 Abstract During the second half of the sixteenth century, engraved series of allegorical subjects featuring personified figures flourished for several decades in the Low Countries before falling into disfavor. Designed by the Netherlandsâ?? leading artists and cut by professional engravers, such series were collected primarily by the urban intelligentsia, who appreciated the use of personification for the representation of immaterial concepts and for the transmission of knowledge, both in prints and in public spectacles. The pairing of embodied forms and serial format was particularly well suited to the portrayal of abstract themes with multiple components, such as the Four Elements, Four Seasons, Seven Planets, Five Senses, or Seven Virtues and Seven Vices. While many of the themes had existed prior to their adoption in Netherlandish graphics, their pictorial rendering had rarely been so pervasive or systematic.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EARLY MODERN BOOK AS SPECTACLE by PAULINE
    THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY: THE EARLY MODERN BOOK AS SPECTACLE by PAULINE E. REID (Under the Direction of Sujata Iyengar) ABSTRACT This dissertation approaches the print book as an epistemologically troubled new media in early modern English culture. I look at the visual interface of emblem books, almanacs, book maps, rhetorical tracts, and commonplace books as a lens for both phenomenological and political crises in the era. At the same historical moment that print expanded as a technology, competing concepts of sight took on a new cultural prominence. Vision became both a political tool and a religious controversy. The relationship between sight and perception in prominent classical sources had already been troubled: a projective model of vision, derived from Plato and Democritus, privileged interior, subjective vision, whereas the receptive model of Aristotle characterized sight as a sensory perception of external objects. The empirical model that assumes a less troubled relationship between sight and perception slowly advanced, while popular literature of the era portrayed vision as potentially deceptive, even diabolical. I argue that early print books actively respond to these visual controversies in their layout and design. Further, the act of interpreting different images, texts, and paratexts lends itself to an oscillation of the reading eye between the book’s different, partial components and its more holistic message. This tension between part and whole appears throughout these books’ technical apparatus and ideological concerns; this tension also echoes the conflict between unity and fragmentation in early modern English national politics. Sight, politics, and the reading process interact to construct the early English print book’s formal aspects and to pull these formal components apart in a process of biblioclasm.
    [Show full text]
  • LIT 372 Topics in Early Modern Literature
    John Jay College of Criminal Justice The City University of New York New Course Proposal When completed, this proposal should be submitted to the Office of the Associate Provost for consideration by the College Curriculum Committee. 1. Department (s) proposing this course: English 2. Title of the course: Topics in Early Modern Literature Abbreviated title (up to 20 characters): TPCS LIT Early Mod 3. Level of this course: ___100 Level ____200 Level ___X__300 Level ____400 Level 4. Course description as it is to appear in the College bulletin: (Write in complete sentences except for prerequisites, hours and credits.) Topics in Early Modern Literature will examine major and minor literary movements, authors, or ideas at work in sixteenth and seventeenth century literature with an eye to the formal features of texts as well as the social, historical, and political contexts in which they appeared. The course will approach the canon for this period not as a fixed entity but as a body of work consistently open to reevaluation and critique; alternative texts, voices, and subject positions relevant to the topic(s) will be included. As a means of understanding the literature of the period, the course may focus on a literary genre or convention (e.g., drama, sonnet) or an important theme (e.g., the Other in literature, hierarchy, literature of love, monarchy in crisis). The specific focus of the course will be determined by the individual professor and may be concerned exclusively with English literature, Western Literature more broadly, or Western and nonWestern literature. Pre-requisite: ENG 102/201 Co-requisite: LIT 2XX (Introduction to Literary Study) or permission of the instructor.
    [Show full text]