DOCSLIB.ORG

Australian Financial Review Americans Just Want to Make

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Australian Financial Review Americans Just Want to Make ___ Advertisement World North America US votes 2020 Opinion Americans just want to make politics boring again In 2016, the Democratic Party's voter base fell apart. In 2020, it is held together by the belief that Donald Trump can still win. AleAleAlexxx T TTuremanuremanureman Contributor Oct 13, 2020 – 12.00am Saved Share There’s a reason why Donald Trump has been on the attack against Joe Biden – he knows BidenBidenBiden can cancan win. win.win. There’s no two ways about it. Middle-of-the-road suburban Americans, especially women, want off the Trump train. They have chaos fatigue. They want decency. They want to make politics boring again. Since January, Biden has consistently led President Trump in hypothetical head-to- head polls by eight points, give or take a few. This race has been incredibly steady in unsteady times. Today, according to the RealClearPolitics averages, Biden sits at plus 9.7 nationally and plus 4.5 in the all-important battleground states. Too close for comfort, but a lead nonetheless. The Democratic Party has returned to the centre under Joe Biden. AP Through a Democratic primary with nearly 30 candidates, impeachment, the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 210,000 American lives lost to the virus, shutdowns and an economic cratering, 20 per cent unemployment, societal unrest, a mess of a debate, and Trump’s COVID-19 diagnosis … the former vice-president has led by about eight points the entire time. It’s remarkable. An argument can be made that many voters made up their minds a long time ago. Advertisement We saw this in the 2018 mid-term elections when Democrats took back the House of Representatives and won nine governorships on the backs of moderate Democratic candidates. While figures such as AleAleAlexandriaxandriaxandria Ocasio-Cortez Ocasio-CortezOcasio-Cortez captured headlines as the new face of progressivism, the candidates who ultimately led to a Democratic majority in the House were moderates. d d h b hhh hhh lll hhh lll Candidates such as Conor Lamb, wwwhohoho w wwononon the thethe P PPennsyennsyennsylvlvlvlvlvaniaaniaania 18th 18th18th congressional congressionalcongressional districtdistrictdistrict in a 2018 special election. In 2016, Donald Trump won the Pennsylvania 18th by 19 points over Hillary Clinton. In 2018, just 1½ years a later, Lamb squeezed in with a win in what would undoubtedly be described as “Trump country”. But why? It became clear in March as more diverse states started voting in the primaries that Biden was building a broad coalition. Lamb proved to be the silver bullet for the Democratic Party in the race. Had the Democrats run a left-wing liberal, they would have been trounced. But Lamb was conservative and populist enough to win, as a Democrat, on Trump's turf. He supported strengthening Obamacare, but also appealed to cultural conservatives by saying he supports a women’s right to choose even though he personally opposes abortion. He supported natural gas exploration, a critical Pennsylvania industry. He supported background checks to buy guns, but also defended the right to bear arms. These are not positions that are in line with the Bernie Sanders wing of the party, but they are positions that paved the way for a Democratic majority in the House. Like Australia, the US is a coalition-based political system, but unlike Australia there are only two parties. Within those two parties are a dizzying array of factions. Politics is a game of addition. In 2016, Trump won by building a fervent base and convincing a majority of soft Republicans and swing independents to take a shot on him. He built a winning coalition while diminishing Hillary Clinton’s attempt to do the same. Since 2016, Trump has made no effort to appeal to those swing independents. HeHeHe didndidndidn’t’t’t’t’t build buildbuildbuildbuild up upupupupononon his hishis base. base.base. The economy was Trump’s saving grace in 2018, but that did not help the Republicans to hold the House. Democrats played the 2018 cycle well, but it wasn’t far-left candidates who won swing seats. It was moderates like b Lamb. In the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries, there were far-left candidates like Sanders, next-generation party leaders like Pete Buttigieg, business figures like Michael Bloomberg and New Democrats like Michael Bennet. But wwwhohoho ultimately ultimatelyultimately proproprovvvededed victorious? victorious?victorious? Biden BidenBiden. Arguments against picking Biden There was a litany of arguments about why Biden wasn’t the right pick. He’s too old. He’s too conservative. He’s too optimistic that he’ll be able to work with Republicans. He doesn’t appeal to younger voters. And on and on ... But ititititit b bbbbecameecameecame clear clearclear in inin March MarchMarch, as more diverse states like South Carolina, Michigan, Texas and Virginia started voting, that Biden was building a broad coalition. That big tent could prove to be a winning formula for him when the dust settles in November. The one thing that unites Democrats of every ilk is antipathy towards Trump. It’s the primary driving factor behind the coalition. Democratic voters throughout the primary season consistently said the most important factor for them in picking a candidate was the challenger's ability to beat Trump. In 2016, the Democratic coalition splintered off because of third-party candidates, negative sentiments among soft Democrats and independents towards Clinton, and apathy driven by the electorate thinking Trump could never win. All of those things are gone in 2020. There are no credible third-party candidates. Most voters like Biden: as of this week, his favourables are higher than his unfavourables. AndAndAnd it’ it’it’sss p pperfectlyerfectlyerfectly clear clearclear to toto Demo DemoDemocratscratscrats that thatthat T TTrumprumprump could couldcould (and (and(and ma mamay)y)y) winwinwin again. again.again. These three drivers are helping Biden’s candidacy. Additionally, Biden is no Sanders. He is not radical, and that's in plain view as Trump has discarded that line of attack in favour of a line that's equally hard to Trump has discarded that line of attack in favour of a line that s equally hard to believe but plays better with the base: that Biden is a puppet. That hasn’t stuck either, and since Biden won the Democratic nomination Trump’s usually killer put- down strategy has been more of a “see what sticks” strategy. And nothing has stuck. RELATED Deficit-wDeficit-wDeficit-wearearearyyy Republicans RepublicansRepublicans lo lolookokok b bbeyeyeyondondond T TTrumprumprump RELATED CurtainCurtainCurtain falling fallingfalling on onon T TTrump'srump'srump's p ppoliticaloliticalolitical op opoperettaerettaeretta RELATED CanCanCan T TTrumprumprump squeeze squeezesqueeze more moremore from fromfrom his hishis w wwhitehitehite base basebase in inin P PPennsyennsyennsylvlvlvlvlvaniaaniaania andandand b bbeyeyeyond?ond?ond? Lastly, time is running out to define Biden. Americans are already voting. Biden is not a liberal. He won’t hike up taxes on the middle and working classes. He won’t defund the police. He won’t take your guns. He won’t eliminate private healthcare. In 2018, Democrats won because they appealed to the middle electorate that was over the President’s antics. In 2020, when the world is even more disorienting, many suburban Americans are exhausted from and disappointed in their country’s leader. A lot of Americans are yearning for a sense of normalcy. They want someone who will listen to the other side, even if that person doesn't agree with them. So with three weeks on the clock, it’s easy to see why Donald Trump believes this is Joe Biden’s race to lose. The US election Brief is your guide to the 2020 race. A bonus newsletter for subscribers. Sign up to receive The Brief once a week in your inbox. SIGN UP NOW AleAleAlexxx T TTuremanuremanureman is founding partner and chief executive of Bondi Partners. Saved Share License article READ MORE US votes 2020 Opinion Donald Trump Trump's White House Trump's America US election USA US Congress LATEST STORIES Trade wars EEEuropuropuropeee cleared clearedcleared b bbyyy W WWTTTOOO to toto imp impimposeoseose $5.5b $5.5b$5.5b of ofof tariffs tariffstariffs on onon US USUS imp impimportsortsorts 1 hr ago Opinion Letters to the Editor Letters:Letters:Letters: Bring BringBring on onon resp respresponsibleonsibleonsible lending lendinglending debate debatedebate Performing arts 79,00079,00079,000 entertainment entertainmententertainment jobs jobsjobs gone gonegone b bbyyy Decemb DecembDecembererer Live Coronavirus pandemic FFFacebacebacebooookokok will willwill ban banban anti-v anti-vanti-vaccineaccineaccine ads adsads SPONSORED.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Resolutions Committee Was Called to Order by Co-Chair Jim Zogby at 10:15 A.M
    The Resolutions Committee was called to order by Co-Chair Jim Zogby at 10:15 a.m. on Friday, August 22, 2014. The Committee considered 27 new Resolutions, which were a combination of message and commemorative Resolutions. 1. The Resolution Highlighting President Obama’s Accomplishments and Agenda Moving Forward was amended with the addition of co-sponsors and passed unanimously. 2. The Resolution Highlighting the Clear Contrast between Democrats and Republicans was amended with the addition of co-sponsors and passed unanimously. 3. The Resolution on the President’s and Democrats’ Continued Commitment to Passing Comprehensive Immigration Reform was amended with the addition of language and the addition of co-sponsors and passed unanimously. 4. The Resolution Supporting the Expansion of Voting Rights was amended with the addition of language and the addition of co-sponsors and passed unanimously. 5. The Resolution Honoring Hispanic Heritage Month was amended with the addition of co- sponsors and passed unanimously. 6. The Resolution Honoring Women’s Equality Day was amended with the addition of co- sponsors and passed unanimously. 7. The Resolution Supporting Equal Rights for the LGBT Community was amended with the addition of co-sponsors and passed unanimously. 8. The Resolution Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of Freedom Summer and Honoring the Victims was amended with the addition and deletion of language and the addition of co-sponsors and passed unanimously. 9. The Resolution Honoring Gospel Music Heritage Month was amended with the addition of co-sponsors and passed unanimously. 10. The Resolution to Urge Congress to Provide the Residents of the District of Columbia with Statehood and Full Democracy was amended with the addition of co-sponsors and passed unanimously.
    [Show full text]
  • April Is the Month to Slice and Dice Virginia's Voting Districts
    Vol. 36, No. 4 www.arlingtondemocrats.org April 2011 April is the month to slice and dice Virginia’s voting districts The General Assembly comes back into ses- House Privileges and Elections Committee this year Summer sion April 4 to take up the task of divying up the made that 1 percent for House of Delegates districts. state into 11 U.S. House of Representatives districts, But Chairman Mark Cole (R-Fredericksburg) ac- be 40 State Senate districts and 100 House of Delegates knowledged there was a downside in that you lose could districts. flexibility and have a harder time keeping commu- Many voters are complaining bitterly that the nities of interest together. And an independent com- a real big process in Virginia allows the state legislature to mission drafting maps has advocated a larger rather draw boundaries with little public input. The com- than a smaller deviation than in the past. (Five per- campaign plaint is classicly stated that voters should choose cent satisfies the courts.) their elected officials, but instead elected officials 4—The political interests of office holders call season choose their voters. for drawing lines that gather in as many of their Altogether, there are at least five drivers influ- supporters as possible and push out as many of the encing district boundaries—although not equally in- opposition as possible. That produces districts with Check out our very fluencing the outcome. shapes only a contortionist could love. Ten years preliminary 1—The state constitution says districts should ago, then-Rep. Tom Davis in neighboring Fairfax be “contiguous and compact” and “give, as nearly County took as many Democratic areas as he could primary ballot on as is practicable, representation in proportion to the and shoved them into Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Suburbanization of the Democratic Party, 1992–2018
    The Suburbanization of the Democratic Party, 1992–2018 David A. Hopkins Boston College [email protected] Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 29, 2019. 1 Abstract Over the past three decades, the Democratic Party has become mostly suburban in both the residence of party supporters in the mass public and the composition of its congressional caucus. This transformation reflects migration patterns among American citizens, partisan shifts among some suburban voters, and a serious relative decline over time in the party’s rural strength. The trend of suburbanization has made the party’s elected officials more ideologically unified, especially on cultural issues, but it also works to preclude the partywide adoption of an ambitious left-wing economic agenda. Suburbanization has occurred alongside a growth in the racial heterogeneity of the Democratic mass membership and elite leadership alike, encouraged by the demographic diversification of American suburbs. Democratic suburban growth has been especially concentrated in the nation’s largest metropolitan areas, reflecting the combined presence of both relatively liberal whites (across education levels) and substantial minority populations, but suburbs elsewhere remain decidedly, even increasingly, Republican in their collective partisan alignment. Rather than stimulating a broad national pro-Democratic backlash across suburban communities in general, as is sometimes suggested by political observers, the election of Donald Trump has instead further magnified this existing divergence—leaving American suburbia, like the nation itself, closely and deeply divided between the two major parties. Introduction Political analysts, including academics, are fond of describing the current era of American politics as primarily distinguished by deep and stable partisan loyalties.
    [Show full text]
  • David Scott 1946–
    H CURRENT MEMBERS H David Scott 1946– UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRAT FROM GEORGIA 2003– A 28-year veteran of the Georgia legislature, David Scott won election to the U.S. House in 2002 as a centrist Democrat representing a newly created district in suburban Atlanta. Scott’s appeal in a racially mixed district illustrated the revolution in southern politics that occurred after the 1960s civil rights movement, when large portions of his district voted for George Wallace. “I want to be viewed as a Image courtesy of the Member Representative who happens to be African American, but one who represents all the people,” Scott said.1 David Albert Scott was born on June 27, 1946, in Aynor, South Carolina. His father was a preacher and a chauffeur, and his mother was a maid and a hospital worker. He attended grade school in the northeast, settling with his parents as they took jobs in Scarsdale, New York. The experience was formative. Scott noted, “I learned at a very young age how to have confidence in myself and how to get along with people who don’t look like me.”2 Scott graduated with a bachelor of arts degree in English and speech from Florida A&M University in 1967. As an intern at the Labor Department in Washington, DC, he met George W. Taylor, an influential labor management expert. Taylor suggested Scott apply to the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, where Taylor taught. In 1969, Scott received an M.B.A. from Wharton. Scott married the former Alfredia Aaron, the youngest sister of professional baseball’s longtime homerun king Hank Aaron.
    [Show full text]
  • “New Democrats” and Why Wisconsin Liberals Hate Them
    WISCONSIN’S NEW “NEW DEMOCRATS” AND WHY WISCONSIN LIBERALS HATE THEM MICHAEL FLAHERTY tate to do it. On top of Representative that, the Milwaukee SFrank Boyle says Democrat has been he still can’t believe on the road constant- what’s happening — ly. As head of the and pounds the table Assembly to reinforce his point. Democratic caucus, Only a few weeks ago, she’s been raising he and his 44 fellow campaign money, Wisconsin Assembly recruiting candidates Democrats voted to and crafting cam- endorse tax breaks for paigns for enough two percent of the candidates so that state’s largest busi- her Democrats can nesses and a fuel tax retake control of the break for Midwest 99-seat house. “I Express Airlines. can’t even count the hours,” says Krug, “Democrats trying to recall her crawling into bed last month of campaign work. with business?” the Superior Democrat shouts incredulously. “We’ve forgotten who we are. But then she smiles. We’ve forgotten we represent working peo- Pro-business Democrats now lead the ple.” Wisconsin Assembly’s Democrats — and peo- “I’m telling you, there are no liberal ple are responding, she says. “We’ve actually Democrats anymore!” raised more money than the Republicans. I’m convinced we can re-take the Assembly this Meanwhile, it’s noon at a Greek restaurant fall.” near the Capitol. Representative Shirley Krug is pondering her sandwich, looking a bit tired Krug says her team has the candidates, the as she reflects on the last few months. “It’s strategy and the money to pick up several been a long, grueling, spring,” shrugs Krug, seats in the Assembly this fall that will put the former university economics instructor Democrats back into the majority when they who is now the Democratic leader of the meet again next January.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton, New Democrats and Social Policy Reform
    What Third Way? Clinton, New Democrats, and Social Policy Reform President Clinton came to office determined to govern as a New Democrat seeking Third Way solutions to a range of problems. More specifically, he was committed to pursue two major reforms in the social policy arena. First, he pledged to overhaul the US's health care system. Second, he promised to "end welfare as we know it." Indeed, the latter had been one of the defining themes of Clinton's effort to portray himself as "a different kind of Democrat." In the end, however, Clinton was not so much defeated as humiliated in his efforts at health care reform and while he did sign, and take credit for, a major revision of the welfare law in August 1996 this conservative legislation was, in reality, largely the product of congressional Republicans. Furthermore, on both issues, Clinton's actions divided the Democratic Party. The effort at health care reform left the Democratic Leadership Council, effectively the official voice of the New Democrat movement, exasperated. Particularly in the aftermath of the 1994 mid-term elections, a conventional wisdom developed which blamed the administration's Health Security Act (HSA) for undoing Clinton's reputation as a New Democrat and instead allowing opponents to portray him as a Big Government Democrat. Conversely on welfare reform, while New Democrats urged Clinton to sign the 1996 welfare reform bill forwarded by the Republican Congress, liberal Democrats expressed their dismay at what they saw as a radical conservative move to end an entitlement for some of the most vulnerable American families .
    [Show full text]
  • 19. the New Deal Democrats: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Party
    fdr4freedoms 1 19. The New Deal Democrats: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Democratic Party With Franklin D. Roosevelt at its helm, the Democratic Party underwent a historic transformation. Before FDR rose to national prominence in the early 1930s, the party had represented a loose conglomeration of local and regional interests. Dominated by the “solid South” that dated to post–Civil War Reconstruction, this group also included Great Plains and Western farmers influenced by the Populist and Progressive movements, as well as the burgeoning ethnic populations of the great cities of the North and East, where the “machine politics” epitomized by New York City’s Tammany Hall ruled the day. Above: A banner for Franklin D. Roosevelt over a pawnshop in This diverse assemblage did not adhere to a central Rosslyn, Virginia, September 1936. ideology or political philosophy, but was instead heavily In November, FDR would outdo his influenced by religious and geographical identities and electoral margins of 1932, winning all but two states and the highest interests. Democrats might be found on both sides of a percentage of electoral votes since variety of political issues. Ironically, the party was home to the virtually uncontested election both the new waves of heavily Catholic and Jewish immigrants of 1820. of the Northeast and the extremely anti-Catholic and nativist Left: A poster for Franklin D. Ku Klux Klan of the South. Roosevelt’s 1932 campaign for president, calling for “action” and The Republicans enjoyed significant support across a fairly “constructive leadership.” The Great wide spectrum of the American political landscape. That party Depression was so cataclysmic that was heavily favored by northern white Protestants, small and it created an appetite for change in America, helping FDR lead a large business interests, professional white-collar workers, historic shift in voting patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Arts Report Card 2018 Your Guide to Voting for the Arts
    CONGRESSIONAL ARTS REPORT CARD 2018 YOUR GUIDE TO VOTING FOR THE ARTS SEPTEMBER 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Vote smART: Will the Midterms Be a “Wave” Election? Vote smART 1 On November 6, 2018, elections will be held for all 435 seats in the U.S. House of Two-Year Timeline 2 Representatives, as well as for six non-voting delegates. A third of the Senate (35 seats) 3 A Pro-Arts Congress will also be up for election. Specically, Democrats must defend 26 of the 35 Senate seats 4 House Arts & STEAM Caucuses this year, while only nine seats will be defended by Republicans. Of note, 10 of these NEA Appropriations History 5 Democratic Senators represent states that President Trump won in 2016. While this House Grading System 6 might be indicative of a tougher re-election bid for a Democrat, this could also become an advantage in those “purple” states where the President’s popularity continues to vacillate. Pro-Arts House Leaders 7 House Arts Indicators 8 Currently, Republicans control the slimmest of margins in the Senate with 51 GOP House Report Card 9-17 members to 49 Democrats. Prospects of majority control ipping in the Senate appear to be a toss-up, since Democrats would have to win all 26 of their Senate seats as well as pick Senate Grading System 18 up two Republican-held seats. The most endangered GOP Senate seats include Senator Pro-Arts Senate Leaders 19 Dean Heller of Nevada and the two open seats currently held by retiring Senators Je Senate Arts Indicators 20 Flake of Arizona and Bob Corker of Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • ABC's Weekly Federal Legislative Update December 7, 2020
    ABC’s Weekly Federal Legislative Update December 7, 2020 Introduction Both the House and Senate are in Washington this week. The Lame Duck Congress has a number of items on their agenda including passing the FY 2021 Appropriations bills and another COVID Relief Package. The current continuing resolution funding the government expires December 11. The following is news from Washington, D.C. Administration Renewable Fuel Standard: Trump Administration Punts to Biden The Trump Administration missed the November 30 deadline to release the Final 2021 RVOs for the Renewable Fuel Standard. As this article discusses, the Trump administration will be passing that obligation on to the incoming Biden Administration. Marc Heller of E&E News PM reported on November 30, “EPA missed its Nov. 30 deadline to set next year's biofuel volumes under the federal renewable fuel standard and is all but certain to leave that job to the incoming Biden administration. “The renewable fuel standard law requires EPA to set final regulations for the coming year by Nov. 30, but the agency has yet to even release a proposal, a delay some industry representatives attribute in part to market uncertainties tied to the COVID-19 pandemic. "It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that EPA is missing its statutory deadline for publishing the final rule for 2021 RVOs, given that we still haven't even seen a proposed rule," said Geoff Cooper, president and CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association, referring to renewable volume obligations under the law. "Even if a proposed rule was released today, it would be next to impossible to have a final rule done by the end of the calendar year, or even by inauguration day," he added.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascendance of Contemporary Democratic Congressional Leaders Ira Steinberg University of Connecticut
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Honors Scholar Theses Honors Scholar Program May 2005 Paths to Power: The Ascendance of Contemporary Democratic Congressional Leaders Ira Steinberg University of Connecticut Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses Recommended Citation Steinberg, Ira , "Paths to Power: The Ascendance of Contemporary Democratic Congressional Leaders" (2005). Honors Scholar Theses. 7. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/7 Paths to Power: The Ascendance of Contemporary Democratic Congressional Leaders Ira Steinberg: University of Connecticut Advisor: Evelyn Simien: University of Connecticut Acknowledgements As the culmination of my career at the University of Connecticut, I wish to use this thesis to thank those that made my career at University of Connecticut so successful. I would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr. Simien and Honors Program advisor Dr. Hettinger for their tireless work in assisting me with the preparation of this thesis. I could not have done it without them. I would like to thank my family, including my Parents, Step-Parents, Aunts, Uncles, and Grandparents for their support through four years of College. I hope this thesis will serve as a down payment for the enormous debt I owe them. This experience would not have been the same without the amazing friends I have had at UConn. I want to thank all my and significant others for making UConn the most fun and unforgettable years of my life so far. Lastly I want to acknowledge the University of Connecticut for its generosity towards me and the opportunities it has opened up to me. 2 Paths to Power: The Ascendance of Contemporary Democratic Congressional Leaders Ira M.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging
    What’s Left of the Left What’s Left of the Left Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times Edited by James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Duke University Press Durham and London 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction: The New World of the Center-Left 1 James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Part I: Ideas, Projects, and Electoral Realities Social Democracy’s Past and Potential Future 29 Sheri Berman Historical Decline or Change of Scale? 50 The Electoral Dynamics of European Social Democratic Parties, 1950–2009 Gerassimos Moschonas Part II: Varieties of Social Democracy and Liberalism Once Again a Model: 89 Nordic Social Democracy in a Globalized World Jonas Pontusson Embracing Markets, Bonding with America, Trying to Do Good: 116 The Ironies of New Labour James Cronin Reluctantly Center- Left? 141 The French Case Arthur Goldhammer and George Ross The Evolving Democratic Coalition: 162 Prospects and Problems Ruy Teixeira Party Politics and the American Welfare State 188 Christopher Howard Grappling with Globalization: 210 The Democratic Party’s Struggles over International Market Integration James Shoch Part III: New Risks, New Challenges, New Possibilities European Center- Left Parties and New Social Risks: 241 Facing Up to New Policy Challenges Jane Jenson Immigration and the European Left 265 Sofía A. Pérez The Central and Eastern European Left: 290 A Political Family under Construction Jean- Michel De Waele and Sorina Soare European Center- Lefts and the Mazes of European Integration 319 George Ross Conclusion: Progressive Politics in Tough Times 343 James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Bibliography 363 About the Contributors 395 Index 399 Acknowledgments The editors of this book have a long and interconnected history, and the book itself has been long in the making.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the New Democrat Coalition Chair
    MESSAGE FROM THE NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION CHAIR The 115th Congress has been unlike any other in recent political history. Over the past two years the Republican majority actively undermined America’s health care system, exploded the deficit, failed to fix our broken immigration system and failed to prepare America’s workforce for the changing nature of our economy. Next Congress, New Democrats want to change the way things are done in Congress. Already we have inducted thirty new members-elect to start the next Congress. The diverse group of new Members will help the Coalition continue to advance bold ideas and innovative solutions and we hope to add additional Members in the future. With this addition, we will be 91-members strong in the 116th Congress. We also worked on a vision for the future of Democratic leadership. In August 2017, I delivered the Democratic Weekly Address and highlighted the New Democrat Coalition’s fight to give every American the opportunity to earn a good life: “Today, we are distracted by a Tweeter-in-Chief who deepens our divisions, sows seeds of discord and fans the flames of violence. Our country needs and deserves leaders who will encourage us to be our better selves and who will champion the ideas that we know are good for our nation. These are the ideas that animate A Better Deal for families across America. “Democrats are all about opportunity, growth, innovation and the good jobs that follow. We will not be distracted. We will not be deterred. Because we understand something that President Trump never will: that our world can be a far, far better place – and that together we can make it so.” We are excited to advance our shared priorities and move our country forward.
    [Show full text]