Journal Divided – “Lincoln and Know Nothings” Excerpt from Chapter 16 of Michael Burlingame’S Abraham Lincoln: a Life (Pgs 1784-1789)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Journal Divided – “Lincoln and Know Nothings” Excerpt from Chapter 16 of Michael Burlingame’s Abraham Lincoln: A Life (pgs 1784-1789) Link to full Chapter Sixteen http://www.knox.edu/documents/pdfs/LincolnStudies/Burlingame,%20Vol%201, %20Chap%2016.pdf Page 3 Lincoln was disappointed by the opposition of John J. Crittenden, who warned that although the Republican nominee was “an honest, worthy and patriotic man,” nevertheless as “the Republicans’ President” he “would be at least a terror to the South.”1 A former congressman (and future senator) from the Blue Grass State, Garrett Davis, called Lincoln “an honest man of fair ability” but found him unacceptable because “for some years past he has been possessed of but one idea – hostility to slavery.”2 Another American party leader who needed to be cultivated was David Davis’s cousin, Congressman Henry Winter Davis of Maryland, who was so influential that the committee of twelve at the Chicago Convention had asked him to run for vice president. He declined lest his candidacy ruin the ticket in the Northwest. Like many other Know Nothings, he objected to the Republican platform’s “supremely foolish” plank denouncing “any change in our naturalization laws or any state legislation by which the rights of citizenship hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired” and favoring “a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens.”3 1 Crittenden’s speeches of 2 August and 30 October, Louisville correspondence, 2 August, New York Times, 8 August 1860, Cincinnati Commercial, 31 October 1860. 2 Davis to an unidentified correspondent, n.p., n.d., New York World, 24 July 1860. 3 Proceedings of the Convention, 132. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

John AJ Creswell of Maryland
Dickinson College Dickinson Scholar Faculty and Staff Publications By Year Faculty and Staff Publications 2015 Forgotten Abolitionist: John A. J. Creswell of Maryland John M. Osborne Dickinson College Christine Bombaro Dickinson College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Osborne, John M., and Christine Bombaro. Forgotten Abolitionist: John A. J. Creswell of Maryland. Carlisle, PA: House Divided Project at Dickinson College, 2015. https://www.smashwords.com/books/ view/585258 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Dickinson Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Forgotten Abolitionist: John A.J. Creswell of Maryland John M. Osborne and Christine Bombaro Carlisle, PA House Divided Project at Dickinson College Copyright 2015 by John M. Osborne and Christine Bombaro Distributed by SmashWords ISBN: 978-0-9969321-0-3 License Notes: This book remains the copyrighted property of the authors. It may be copied and redistributed for personal use provided the book remains in its complete, original form. It may not be redistributed for commercial purposes. Cover design by Krista Ulmen, Dickinson College The cover illustration features detail from the cover of Harper's Weekly Magazine published on February 18, 1865, depicting final passage of Thirteenth Amendment on January 31, 1865, with (left to right), Congressmen Thaddeus Stevens, William D. Kelley, and John A.J. Creswell shaking hands in celebration. TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword by Matthew Pinsker Introduction Marylander Dickinson Student Politician Unionist Abolitionist Congressman Freedom’s Orator Senator Postmaster General Conclusion Afterword Notes Bibliography About the Authors FOREWORD It used to be considered a grave insult in American culture to call someone an abolitionist.
[Show full text]
The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861 Michael Dudley Robinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Fulcrum of the Union: The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861 Michael Dudley Robinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Robinson, Michael Dudley, "Fulcrum of the Union: The Border South and the Secession Crisis, 1859-1861" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 894. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/894 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. FULCRUM OF THE UNION: THE BORDER SOUTH AND THE SECESSION CRISIS, 1859- 1861 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Michael Dudley Robinson B.S. North Carolina State University, 2001 M.A. University of North Carolina – Wilmington, 2007 May 2013 For Katherine ii Acknowledgements Throughout the long process of turning a few preliminary thoughts about the secession crisis and the Border South into a finished product, many people have provided assistance, encouragement, and inspiration. The staffs at several libraries and archives helped me to locate items and offered suggestions about collections that otherwise would have gone unnoticed. I would especially like to thank Lucas R.
[Show full text]
Maryland Historical Magazine Patricia Dockman Anderson, Editor Matthew Hetrick, Associate Editor Christopher T
Friends of the Press of the Maryland Historical Society The Maryland Historical Society (MdHS) is committed to publishing the fnest new work on Maryland history. In late 2005, the Publications Committee, with the advice and support of the development staf, launched the Friends of the Press, an efort dedicated to raising money used solely for bringing new titles into print. Response has been enthusiastic and generous and we thank you. Our most recent Friends of the Press title, the much-anticipated Betsy Bonaparte has just been released. Your support also allowed us to publish Combat Correspondents: Baltimore Sun Correspondents in World War II and Chesapeake Ferries: A Waterborne Tradition, 1632–2000, welcome complements to the Mary- land Historical Society’s already fne list of publications. Additional stories await your support. We invite you to become a supporter, to follow the path frst laid out with the society’s founding in 1844. Help us fll in the unknown pages of Maryland’s past for future generations. Become, quite literally, an important part of Maryland history. If you would like to make a tax-deductible gif to the Friends of the Press, please direct your gif to Development, Maryland Historical Society, 201 W. Monument Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201. For additional information on MdHS publications, contact Patricia Dockman Anderson, Editor, 410-685-3750 x317, or [email protected]. Maryland Historical Society Founded 1844 Ofcers Robert R. Neall, Chairman Louise Lake Hayman, Vice President Alex. G. Fisher, Vice Chairman Frederick M. Hudson, Vice President Burton K. Kummerow, President Jayne H. Plank, Vice President James W.
[Show full text]
The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts CITIES AT WAR: UNION ARMY MOBILIZATION IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1861-1865 A Dissertation in History by Timothy Justin Orr © 2010 Timothy Justin Orr Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The dissertation of Timothy Justin Orr was reviewed and approved* by the following: Carol Reardon Professor of Military History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Director of Graduate Studies in History Mark E. Neely, Jr. McCabe-Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Matthew J. Restall Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Colonial Latin American History, Anthropology, and Women‘s Studies Carla J. Mulford Associate Professor of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT During the four years of the American Civil War, the twenty-three states that comprised the Union initiated one of the most unprecedented social transformations in U.S. History, mobilizing the Union Army. Strangely, scholars have yet to explore Civil War mobilization in a comprehensive way. Mobilization was a multi-tiered process whereby local communities organized, officered, armed, equipped, and fed soldiers before sending them to the front. It was a four-year progression that required the simultaneous participation of legislative action, military administration, benevolent voluntarism, and industrial productivity to function properly. Perhaps more than any other area of the North, cities most dramatically felt the affects of this transition to war. Generally, scholars have given areas of the urban North low marks. Statistics refute pessimistic conclusions; northern cities appeared to provide a higher percentage than the North as a whole.
[Show full text]
Hay, John. Inside Lincoln's White House: the Complete Civil War Diary of John Hay
Hay, John. Inside Lincoln's White House: The Complete Civil War Diary of John Hay. Edited by Michel Burlingame and John R. Turner Ettlinger. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1997. White House besieged, James Lane and Kansas, 1 Threat to Lincoln's life, 1-2 Ward Hill Lamon and Cassius Clay, 2 Guarding White House, 2 Maryland, Baltimore, troops, Scott, Seward, 3 Massachusetts in capitol, 4-5 James Lane, 5, 9, 13 Baltimore secessionists, 5-7 John B. Magruder joining Confederates, 5 Chase and confusing of orders, 6 Cassius Clay, 8 Food shortages in besieged Washington, 8 Delaware, 8-9 Southern newspapers and letters, badly written, 9-10 Jefferson Davis and Lincoln, Confederate constitution, 10 Lincoln and troops and siege of Washington, 11 Dahlgren, 11 Lincoln and strategy, 11 Benjamin F. Butler and Maryland legislature, 12 Carl Schurz, , Lincoln, 12-14 William F. Channing, slavery, abolition, martial law, 12-13 Suspension of habeas corpus, 13 Indians, 14 Virginia Unionists, 15 Baltimore, 16 Ellsworth, 16 Fernando Wood, Isham Harris, Lincoln, 17 Lincoln and Maryland secessionists, 17-18 Hannibal Hamlin, 18 Cairo, Kentucky neutrality, 19 Brown, Orville Hickman, abolition, slavery, 19-20 Ellsworth, Zouaves, 20-21 Jefferson Davis, secession, right of revolution, 21 Anderson, Robert, 21 Dahlgren gun, 22 Ellsworth Zouaves, Willard Hotel, fire, 22-23 Carl Schurz, fugitive slaves, 22-23 Secession, habeas corpus, 28 Lincoln and cotton trade, 30-31 Benjamin F. Butler, Fremont, Wool, 31 Seward, 40 Emancipation Proclamation, 40-41 Salmon P. Chase, 40. Charleston, South Carolina coast, 43ff Fort Pulaski, 46-48 Florida, 48ff African American singing, 49, 58-59 Lincoln, Meade, Gettysburg, 61-66, 68 Lincoln and soldier punishment, executions, 64 Salmon P.
[Show full text]
Andrew Johnson and the Patronage James Lewis Baumgardner
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-1968 Andrew Johnson and the Patronage James Lewis Baumgardner Recommended Citation Baumgardner, James Lewis, "Andrew Johnson and the Patronage. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1968. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1874 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by James Lewis Baumgardner entitled "Andrew Johnson and the Patronage." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. LeRoy Graf, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: John Muldowney, D. H. Carlisle, Harold S. Fink, Richard C. Marins Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) November 22, 1968 To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by James Lewi s Baumgardner entitled "Andrew Johnson and the Patronage . " I recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a maj or in History. We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance : Accepted for the Council: Vice Chancellor for Graduate Studies and Research D!: S SEi:T.r\TIOf,: Blr:n :.
[Show full text]
The History of the Loyal Denominator, 79 La
Louisiana Law Review Volume 79 | Number 1 The Fourteenth Amendment: 150 Years Later A Symposium of the Louisiana Law Review Fall 2018 The iH story of the Loyal Denominator Christopher R. Green Repository Citation Christopher R. Green, The History of the Loyal Denominator, 79 La. L. Rev. (2019) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol79/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The History of the Loyal Denominator Christopher R. Green* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................... 48 I. An Exposition of Loyal Denominatorism ...................................... 52 A. The Traditional Account and a Timeline ................................. 52 B. Thirteenth Amendment Legitimacy Requires a Loyal Denominator ............................................................................ 57 C. Loyal Denominatorism as Recognition of the Naysaying Power of Article V .................................................................. 60 D. Loyal Denominatorism as Legitimation for the Reconstruction Acts: Ackerman, Harrison, Amar, and Colby Contrasted .............................................................. 62 II. A History of Fourteenth Amendment Loyal Denominatorism....... 64 A. Various Textual Homes for Loyal Denominatorism
[Show full text]
President-Elect in Springfield (1860-1861)
Chapter Seventeen “I Will Suffer Death Before I Will Consent to Any Concession or Compromise”: President-elect in Springfield (1860-1861) During the four months separating his election from his inauguration, Lincoln faced the daunting challenge of Southern secession. Though he would not officially take power until March 1861, his party looked to him for guidance. Like most Republicans, he was startled when the Cotton States made good their supposedly idle threats to withdraw from the Union.1 Should they be allowed to go in peace? Should they be forcibly resisted? Should they be conciliated or appeased? What compromise measures might preserve national unity without sacrificing the party’s principles? Radicals like Zachariah Chandler believed “all will be well” if Lincoln would only “‘Stand like an Anvil when the sparks fall thick & fast, a fiery shower,’” but some Republicans feared that he would not do so.2 A few days after the election, Charles Francis Adams viewed Southern threats to secede as a means “to frighten Mr Lincoln at the outset, and to compel him to declare himself in opposition to the principles of the party that has elected him.” Adams confessed that the awaited the president-elect’s 1 David M. Potter, Lincoln and His Party in the Secession Crisis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1942), 75-80. 2 Zachariah Chandler to Lyman Trumbull, Detroit, 13 November 1860, Trumbull Family Papers, Lincoln Presidential Library, Springfield. Chandler was quoting, somewhat inaccurately, from a poem by George Washington Doane. 1875 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 1, Chapter 17 reaction “with some misgivings,” for “the swarms that surround Mr Lincoln are by no means the best.”3 Adams need not have worried, for Lincoln sided with the “stiff-backed” Republicans in rejecting any concession of basic principle, just as he had rebuffed those eastern Republicans who two years earlier had supported the reelection of Douglas.
[Show full text]
Maryland Historical Magazine, 1941, Volume 36, Issue No. 4
mpi sc szn-i-iHi MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE VOL. XXXVI DECEMBER, 1941 No. 4 JOSHUA BARNEY AND THE FRENCH REVOLUTION By BERNARD MAYO When William Wirt was writing his biography of Patrick Henry and having difficulty in finding material on his subject, St. George Tucker commiserated with him on the indifference of Virginians to their great men. It seemed to Tucker that even Socrates would have been soon forgotten in the Ancient Dominion.1 This same sort of indifference has obscured the merits of a num- ber of Maryland's distinguished sons, and among them until recently has been Joshua Barney of Baltimore. To most Americans his name, if it meant anything at all, vaguely recalled the gallant defense of Washington in 1814 made by Barney's marines and flotilla-men at William Wirt's home town of Bladensburg. Yet this was but one of the Marylander's many exploits and public services. Happily he has now been rescued from an undeserved obscurity by Mr. Hulbert Footner's robust and stirring biography. Sailor of Fortune: The Life and Adventures of Commodore Barney, U. S. N.2 It is not the purpose here to recount what Mr. Footner has already told, but rather to throw a little additional light on one phase of Joshua Barney's career. In editing for the American Historical Association a volume comprising the instructions sent by the British foreign secretaries to Britain's envoys in America from 1791 to 1812, several items have been discovered which are pertinent to the man. The Foreign Office archives reveal that 1St.
[Show full text]
The Role of Internal Politics in American Diplomacy
Autopsy of a Failure: The Frustrated Career of the Union Party Movement, 1848-1860 Sean Patrick Nalty Kalispell, MT B.A., University of Montana, May 2004 M.A., University of Virginia, August 2005 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………....1 CHAPTER 1 – Loosening Bonds of Party, Loosening Bonds of Union, 1848-1849…………..10 CHAPTER 2 – The “Partisan” Crisis of 1850…………………………………………......41 CHAPTER 3 – An Abortive Realignment, 1851-1852……………………………………….90 CHAPTER 4 – “The Test of Parties,” 1852-1854…………………………………………..139 CHAPTER 5 – The Balance of Power, 1854-1856…………………………………………186 CHAPTER 6 – “The Biggest and Best Party We Have Ever Seen,” 1857-1859……………...226 CHAPTER 7 – “We Are Going to Destruction As Fast As We Can,” 1859-1861……….257 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………..292 Introduction The thesis of this dissertation searches for elements of continuity in the continued appeals for a national “Union Party” from roughly 1849 to 1861. Historians have explored various parts of this movement in a discrete fashion, but never has anyone attempted to examine the history of the effort to create a Union Party across the decade of the 1850s. What I find is that all incarnations of the Union Party stressed a common devotion to the rule of law, which they saw as under threat by sectional agitators who stirred up the passions of the public. Whether in debates over the right of the federal government to coerce a state, the legality of the Fugitive Slave Act, and presence of filibustering oversees, or the violence which attended partisan elections, Americans’ respect for the rule of law seemed at issue throughout that turbulent decade.
[Show full text]
Reconstruction and the Mexican Crisis of 1864
Reconstruction and the Mexican Crisis of 1864 By DALE STEINER The violent Congressional reaction to the accession of the Emperor Maximilian to the Mexican throne, despite its dra matic impact, has been largely ignored by historians. A prom inent diplomatic historian dismisses the episode as a "tempest in a teapot," 1 while those authors dealing more specifically with the Civil War and Reconstruction have ignored the in cident altogether. The tendency on the part of Reconstruction historians to disregard any discussion of the international re lations of the era is perhaps the result of an assumption that foreign policy was administered independently of domestic concerns, that the political struggle taking place in Washing ton between the President and Congress had no relation to events in London and Paris. An examination of the domestic political storm caused by Louis Napoleon's installation of Maximilian in Mexico leads to a challenge of this assumption by demonstrating that not only was the administration of foreign affairs not independent of domestic concerns, it was actually subservient to internal political needs-domestic poli tics spilled over into the international sphere; external events were utilized to acquire power within the domestic framework. An analysis of the politics surrounding the Mexican inci dent might also be useful in encouraging a reappraisal of an older interpretation of Reconstruction no longer current. The present interest in securing civil rights for oppressed minori ties has contributed immeasureably to the interpretation that the radical measures of Reconstruction were the actions of men motivated by ideals of racial justice. The acceptance of this premise has resulted in the repudiation of the "political school," which viewed the attention given to emancipation and civil rights as nothing more than a smokescreen designed to disguise an attempt by a coterie of cynical "Jacobins" to achieve national political dominance.
[Show full text]
Hannibal Hamlin-Lincoln's Vice President ( First Term)
IJulltotin or The Lincoln Natkmal Llf~ fo~J.nd a 1 S<tn • • • Or. R. C~.ra l d Mc~t u.r 1 ry, Edl10t" Publbh~ f!ac:h mon1h by Thr lin~ln National l;i(~ Jn.. -uran~~ Comp.~~l'lf, t•ort W•yn~. Number 1617 Fort Wayne, lndlana November, 1972 Hannibal Hamlin-Lincoln's Vice President ( First Term) Murat Halstead, a correspondent HannibtJl Hamlin of Hampden, De~ four years in 1848 and re .. eJ~ted in for the Cincinnati Commercial, made ccmber 3, 1934.) 1851. He resigned in 1857 to be in a eireuit of aJJ the national political A candidate for the presidential augurated governor, having been conventions in 1860, and, after report nomination, Edward Bates, of St. elected as a Republican. He resigned ing in detail from Chicago the char Louis, Missouri, who later beeame the governorship Jess than one month acteristic scenes and memorable events Lincoln's Attorney General, was criti· afterward. as he bad again been se of Abraham Lincoln's nomination for lected for a six year tenn in the the presidency on the Republican United States Senate. He resigned his ticket, he made the statement that, Se:nate seat in January, 1861, having "The nomination of (the) Vice.. Presi been elected viee·president on the dent was not particularly exciting/' Republican ticket with Abraham Lin· Hannibal Hamlin of Maine had only coin. one competitor who made any show Hamlin, while decidedly anti.slav in the race. and that was Cassius ery, regarded tht' institution beyond M. Clay of Kentucky. The other can· the legislative authority of the national didate-s were Nathaniel P.
[Show full text]